ABSTRACT: Adequate cooking of meat is necessary to inactivate microbial pathogens. This is particularly important
for ground meat products and some variety meats where pathogens can be present internally. Consumers are being
advised on appropriate temperatures to which meat products should be cooked, and to use a meat thermometer to
ensure these temperatures are reached. However, consumers are more likely to assess cooking status by the color of
the meat or juice. This article reviews the factors that can influence the final color of cooked meat. In most instances,
these factors influence color by modifying the meat pigment myoglobin prior to and during cooking. Many factors
can prolong the pink “uncooked” color in meat, including high pH, modified atmosphere packaging, rapid thawing,
low fat content, nitrite, and irradiation. Such factors may lead to overcooking and loss of food quality, and consumer
rejection. Alternatively, factors that cause “premature browning” of meat, where the interior of the product looks
cooked but a microbiologically safe temperature has not been reached, are food safety issues. Pale, soft exudative
meats can prematurely brown, as can meats packaged under oxygenated conditions, frozen in bulk or thawed over
long periods, or those that have had salts or lean finely textured beef added. Meats cooked from a frozen state or
irradiated in aerobic conditions might also be at risk, but this might depend on meat species. In summary, the color
of cooked meat is not a good indicator of adequate cooking, and the use of a food thermometer is recommended.
Keywords: meat color, cooked, myoglobin, pathogen, thermometer
Introduction The United States Dept. of Health and Human Services (USDHHS)
C 2006 Institute of Food Technologists Vol. 71, Nr. 4, 2006—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE R31
doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2006.00029.x
Further reproduction without permission is prohibited
Does it look cooked? Cooked meat color . . .
R: Concise Reviews in Food Science
interested in when defining the messages to be included in food ment that produces the favored bright red color of raw meat, and
safety promotional material. is formed rapidly in the presence of oxygen at normal atmospheric
pressure (Varnam and Sutherland 1995).
Myoglobin and Cooking While hemoproteins, mostly myoglobin, constitute only about
M yoglobin, an oxygen-binding protein found in muscle, is 0.5% of the wet weight of red meats, the response of these pigments
the pigment most responsible for the color of meat, though to heat largely determines the color of cooked meat (Lytras and oth-
hemoglobin (the oxygen-binding protein in blood, which has con- ers 1999). Heating causes denaturation of the globin, which then
siderable homology) may also be present in small quantities. Myo- precipitates with other meat proteins. Denaturation of myoglobin
globin consists of a globin protein and a heme group containing a and other proteins begins between 55 ◦ C and 65 ◦ C in meat, and most
central iron atom. The iron atom is attached to the globin and 4 ni- denaturation has occurred by 75 ◦ C or 80 ◦ C (Varnam and Sutherland
trogen atoms, and has a 6th coordination point that can link with 1995; Hunt and others 1999). The rate of myoglobin denaturation
structurally compatible substances, usually water or oxygen. While slows with increasing meat temperature, and this is likely to be re-
the basic structure of myoglobin does not differ between animal lated to the concurrent rise in meat pH with cooking (Geileskey and
species, small differences in amino acid composition and stability others 1998).
have been noted between pig myoglobin and that of cattle and sheep The 3 forms of myoglobin differ in their sensitivity to heat. De-
(Varnam and Sutherland 1995). oxymyoglobin is the least sensitive to heat denaturation, followed
Myoglobin exists in three main forms, each producing a dis- by oxyMb, then metMb, though the latter 2 have fairly similar heat
tinctive color (Figure 1). In living tissue, the physiologically active sensitivities (Van Laack and others 1996a; Hunt and others 1999). As
oxymyoglobin (oxyMb) and deoxymyoglobin (deoxyMb) forms are the globin is denatured, metMb forms the brown globin hemichro-
maintained through the activity of metmyoglobin (metMb) reduc- mogen, also known as ferrihemochrome. The other myoglobins are
tase enzymes. These processes decline postmortem, and storage denatured to the red globin hemochromogen, also known as ferro-
conditions become more important in determining the proportion hemochrome (Warren and others 1996b). The latter is readily oxi-
of each myoglobin form present (Warriss 2000). Deoxymyoglobin is dized to the former, so ferrihemochrome is present in larger amounts
found where oxygen is absent, such as in vacuum-packaged meats in cooked meats (Varnam and Sutherland 1995).
or in the center of meat portions. The ferrous iron becomes oxidized Adequate cooking of meat produces a color change to off-white,
by free radicals when meat is stored for long periods of time, pro- grey, or brown hues, depending on the type of muscle. The ultimate
ducing the brown pigment metMb, which also forms where oxygen- color depends on the extent of ferrihemochrome formation, which
dependent meat enzymes and aerobic microorganisms successfully in turn is a product of the initial proportionality of the myoglobins,
compete with meat pigments for oxygen. Oxymyoglobin is the pig- and the final concentration of undenatured oxyMb or deoxyMb
a
oxidation
oxidation
deoxygenationb (free radicals)c
Rate of denaturation
(sensitivity to heat): Fast Slow Fastest
R32 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 71, Nr. 4, 2006 URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org
Does it look cooked? Cooked meat color . . .
URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org Vol. 71, Nr. 4, 2006—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE R33
Does it look cooked? Cooked meat color . . .
R: Concise Reviews in Food Science
and others (1996b), beef patties with higher pH values were not mulation and pH) and handling, batches of meat can inexplicably
always associated with a red cooked color and the authors admit to vary in the final cooked color.
the interference of “other (unknown) factors.” Thirty percent of the In chickens, meat from defrosting immature birds can be dark-
color variation that was observed in these studies was attributed to ened as hemoglobin moves out of the porous, incompletely calci-
the initial myoglobin concentration in the raw products. Certainly, fied walls of the bones to accumulate in the tissues. Temperature
meat from different animals or from muscles of the same animal change (for example, freezing, reheating) can also darken poultry
can vary in their myoglobin content (Varnam and Sutherland 1995). meat by causing cell degradation and migration of hemoglobin pig-
Additional variation (33%) was attributed to the reducing capacity ment from the bone. For example, darkening of meat on thigh pieces
of the meat (Van Laack and others 1996b). This has also been shown can be related to pigment migration from the femur (Lyon and Lyon
to influence the myoglobin form and the extent of meat browning, 2002). So, while myoglobin and hemoglobin are both important, the
but will be detailed in later sections. latter is more influential on poultry meat color (Boulianne and King
In another study, pork loin chops of 2 pH groups (pH 5.4 to 5.5, 1998). When cooked, tissues with more heme pigment will appear
pH 5.6 to 5.7) cooked to 3 endpoint temperatures could not be sep- darker than, for example, breast meat (Lyon and Lyon 2002). Chicken
arated by their Hunter values immediately after cooking (Mancini leg quarters (bone-in) were cooked to an IT of 75 ◦ C or 85 ◦ C. At 75
◦
and others 2005). The small difference in pH between these groups C, the meat adjacent to the bone retained more redness than the
could be one explanation, as could the high (>71 ◦ C) tempera- surface. The redness of the meat adjacent to the bone was amplified
tures studied. Ground lamb with a pH lower than normal (pH 5.38, if the portions were chilled above 0 ◦ C prior to cooking compared to
normal pH 5.70) demonstrated much slower denaturation of myo- chilling at <0 ◦ C, though cooking to 85 ◦ C negated color differences
globin when cooked (Lytras and others 1999). The authors suggested attributed to chill temperatures (Lyon and Lyon 2002).
that the low pH of the raw meat had denatured the proteins that Differences in cooked color have also been observed in beef
ordinarily would be available to interact with myoglobin during sourced from assorted muscles. The myoglobin in ground beef
cooking, so the myoglobin became more stable in the absence of patties prepared from sirloin (longissimus dorsi) denatured at a
these reactants. However, low pH favors the formation of brown faster rate during cooking than in patties made from shoulder steak
metMb, and also destabilizes deoxyMb (Varnam and Sutherland (chuck) or shin. The pH and concentration of myoglobin was sim-
1995). ilar in all raw cuts (Geileskey and others 1998). A similar effect has
While there can be some variation, there is enough evidence to been observed in ground lamb, where myoglobin denaturation dur-
suggest that a strong relationship exists between the pH of raw meat ing cooking was faster in sirloin than shoulder or leg steaks, though
and cooked meat color. Generally, meat with a pH above normal only at temperatures <70 ◦ C (Lytras and others 1999). Since the rate
slows the denaturation of myoglobin, and the meat can still remain of myoglobin denaturation was measured in these studies, the differ-
pink when cooked to the recommended IT. High pH meat is not ences cannot be explained by variability in gross myoglobin content.
uncommon in the domestic market, particularly if animals have The authors suggested that final meat color might be influenced by
been chronically stressed prior to slaughter (Trout 1989). Of 295 U.S. different concentrations and thermal stabilities of reactant proteins
samples of raw beef, 106 (36%) were above the normal pH range of in the muscle groups. The extent of denaturation of these proteins
5.3 to 5.7 (Mendenhall 1989). The pinkness associated with prop- during cooking would in turn influence the extent of interaction
erly cooked high pH meat is perhaps more an issue for food quality with, and denaturation of, the myoglobin, which itself compara-
than food safety. Consumers may perceive that high pH meat is less tively shows very little difference in stability and reactivity between
cooked, and will proceed to continue cooking to higher tempera- muscles (Geileskey and others 1998; Lytras and others 1999). This
tures or for a longer time, with subsequent losses in quality (e.g., theory has also been proposed to account for differences in the rate
texture, juiciness, yield). One potential food safety issue with high of myoglobin denaturation between animal species. For example,
pH meat is that consumers who use thermometers to judge done- minced lamb sirloin demonstrated a faster rate of myoglobin de-
ness may begin to doubt their accuracy when a meat product still naturation during cooking than beef sirloin (Geileskey and others
appears to be undercooked, and thermometer use might cease. Of 1998). However, the pH and hemoprotein content of the lamb was
more importance are meat products that visually appear cooked lower than that of the beef, which possibly influenced this result.
before a safe IT has been reached. This “premature browning” has Earlier work had suggested that meat sourced from older animals
been shown to occur in PSE pork products, and could be an issue would brown quicker than cuts from young animals during cook-
for other low pH meats. ing (Marksberry 1990). In another study (Hague and others 1994),
ground beef from A-maturity (young at slaughter) and E-maturity
The Influence of Meat Source (old at slaughter) carcasses were compared for color when cooked
R34 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 71, Nr. 4, 2006 URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org
Does it look cooked? Cooked meat color . . .
URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org Vol. 71, Nr. 4, 2006—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE R35
Does it look cooked? Cooked meat color . . .
R: Concise Reviews in Food Science
Several publications (USDA 1998; Lyon and others 2000, 2001; were less cohesive than other preparations, so heat transfer was
Berry and others 2001) have addressed the relationship between better during cooking and browning was more rapid. Lien and oth-
freezing history and cooked meat color through more detailed inves- ers (2002b) proposed that pork patties cooked from frozen might
tigations. All of these studies investigated the impact on the cooked brown earlier through a combination of greater thermal conductiv-
color of ground beef with different freezing history (stored frozen as ity (2 to 3 times greater in frozen than thawed meat) and absorption
patties or as bulk mince) and thawing conditions (2 h at room tem- of more energy (the energy released as ice crystals convert to water
perature, 4h under refrigeration or microwaved). Cooking involved is absorbed). So at a common endpoint temperature, frozen pat-
grilling to ITs of 52.7 ◦ C, 65.6 ◦ C, 71.1 ◦ C, and 79.4 ◦ C. The freez- ties would have absorbed more energy than thawed patties, and
ing history and thawing conditions interacted to modify the cooked this should increase browning. This does not explain the opposite
color of the patties when compared to freshly prepared and cooked observation for beef patties, where those cooked from frozen re-
beef patties, and a large number of outcomes were observed. Typi- main redder than those cooked after thawing (Van Laack and others
cally, ground beef stored as bulk and formed into patties just prior 1996a).
to cooking showed a higher incidence of premature browning. For It is clear that freezing history will affect the color of cooked
example, as many as two thirds of the patties formed from ground ground meat so that cooking to an IT of 71 ◦ C will not predictably pro-
beef frozen in bulk and thawed overnight in a refrigerator had turned duce a patty that “looks cooked,” though further studies are needed
brown at IT 65.6 ◦ C, despite incomplete thawing and shorter cook- to investigate the mechanisms behind these observations. Cooking
ing times (USDA 1998; Berry and others 2001). It was also more from frozen or after rapid thawing generally prolongs pink color,
common for the juices of patties formed from bulk frozen ground though this might differ with meat type. Alternatively, patties that
beef to have no pink or red color at temperatures less than 71 ◦ C have been formed from bulk frozen beef or that have been slowly
(Lyon and others 2000). While patties prepared from bulk-frozen thawed could appear brown at unsafe cooking temperatures.
beef were the least red upon thawing and cooking, at equivalent ITs
fresh beef patties were significantly redder, and beef stored frozen
as patties and thawed before cooking were the reddest. The cooked
colors of the patties stored frozen did not significantly change with The Influence of Fat Content
thawing method (room temperature, under refrigeration or in the
microwave) in any of the studies. All of these methods were rapid
thawing techniques, and it is more likely that the time of thawing has
T here is an increasing trend for consumers to favor meat products
lower in fat, such as beef patties prepared with lean meat. Some
publications have indicated that fat content does not influence the
more effect than the method, which might account for the greater cooked color of meat in any readily discernable way (Troutt and
browning observed in the bulk frozen beef (Van Laack and others others 1992b; Berry 1994; Berry and others 2001). For example, beef
1996a; Lyon and others 2001). patties with fat content between 5% and 30% were cooked to an IT
There is uncertainty over the changes in myoglobin chemistry of 71 ◦ C or 77 ◦ C. When raw, the lower fat patties were distinctively
brought about by freezing history that influences color. Van Laack darker red, but when cooked the concentration of fat did not affect
and others (1996b) could not attribute changes in myoglobin denat- surface color, uniformity of surface color, or internal color (Troutt
uration or a∗ value brought about by frozen storage to any differences and others 1992b).
in reducing capacity, concentration of metMb or cooking method, Other studies suggest that the fat content of meat may have some
though the differences in product formulation and cooking from effect on the final cooked color, with higher fat patties appearing less
frozen are likely to have had some influence in their study. Ben Ab- pink (Berry 1998; Berry and others 2001). In beef, the oxidation state
dallah and others (1999) compared the concentration of each form of lipids and pigments are closely linked, so that an increase in one
of myoglobin between raw beef cuts that had undergone a freeze– similarly increases the other (Varnam and Sutherland 1995). There is
slow thaw cycle and fresh beef cuts. When both were stored at 2 ◦ C enough evidence to confirm that, at least in raw meat, myoglobin has
in the dark in gas-impermeable film, the previously frozen meat an important role in the oxidation of polyunsaturated lipids (Baron
contained significantly more metMb and less oxyMb than the fresh and Anderson 2002). While the oxidation processes involved in meat
meat for most of the experiment. The high concentration of metMb cooking will alone increase metMb and ferrihemochrome, the effect
would have increased the rate of formation of brown color if this could be augmented where the fat content is higher. The relationship
meat were cooked. between lipid and metMb oxidation is not fully understood, though
Several hypotheses have been summarized by Ben Abdallah and it might involve the formation of free radicals or oxygen depletion
others (1999) to explain the increase in metMb brought about by during lipid oxidation (Monahan and others 2005).
freezing. Proposed processes include autooxidation (the nonenzy- While fat content might influence the cooked color of meat, it
matic spontaneous oxidation of myoglobin by free oxygen), cell is probably not as influential as other factors that alter cooked
membrane disruption brought about by freezing, which allows cat- color, particularly high pH and freezing history (Berry 1998; Berry
alysts of oxidative reactions to come into contact with myoglobin and Bigner-George 2000). None of the publications cited above ex-
(perhaps in a more concentrated form in unfrozen liquid pockets), pressed any concern over premature browning due to fat concentra-
and disruption of the metaglobin-reducing enzyme system through tion alone. The only food safety concern relating to fat and meat color
disruption of enzyme structure or function during freezing. Lyon lies where commercial establishments, such as burger restaurants,
and others (2001) have also suggested that slow freeze–thaw rates cook meat products according to set time/temperature regimes that
may damage the myoglobin protein, promoting faster denaturation have been based on producing a safe and visually cooked product.
or oxidation during cooking and increasing the possibility of pre- Fat is an efficient conductor of heat, and higher fat meats will reach
mature browning. However, none of these hypotheses account for target ITs quicker than those with less fat (Troutt and others 1992b;
patties that are cooked from frozen or after a short thaw (for ex- Liu and Berry 1996). If these regimes are applied to lower fat for-
ample, microwaving), where the formation of brown color during mulations without modification, it is possible that meat products
cooking is limited (Lyon and others 2000). will fail to reach safe ITs. However, visual assessment of the low fat
Physical factors are probably also important. Berry and others product after the established cooking structure will quickly indicate
(2001) suggested that patties prepared from bulk frozen beef mince that a food safety problem may exist.
R36 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 71, Nr. 4, 2006 URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org
Does it look cooked? Cooked meat color . . .
URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org Vol. 71, Nr. 4, 2006—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE R37
Does it look cooked? Cooked meat color . . .
R: Concise Reviews in Food Science
irradiated fillets were redder than controls, though aerobic storage radiation of precooked products (Holownia and others 2003). There
reduced irradiation-induced redness (Du and others 2002). In test- is a large body of literature on this topic, but the condition is an issue
ing the effect of irradiation on the cooked color of meats from differ- for food quality, not food safety. Pinkiness in cooked meat will cause
ent poultry species, Millar and others (2002) found that all irradiated consumers to reject the meat as undercooked, or subject the meat
cuts were redder than controls, though there were differences be- to further cooking. Pink defect will not be reviewed further in this
tween species and muscle type (leg, breast). An increase in red color paper.
has also been reported for irradiated precooked pork sausages, par-
ticularly if stored under vacuum (Jo and others 2000). Conclusions
Several hypotheses have been suggested to explain irradiation-
induced color change. Nanke and others (1998) suggest that the in-
crease in yellowness of raw beef irradiated aerobically could be due
T he color of a meat product once cooked is not a good indication
that the food has reached a microbiologically safe IT. Ground,
rolled, injected or variety meats require thorough cooking to inac-
to formation of metMb, which would increase the rate of brown- tivate any pathogenic microorganisms that might be present inter-
ing upon cooking. Under aerobic conditions the radiation stimu- nally. The greatest issue for food safety is when the interior of cooked
lates lipid oxidation (Kusmider and others 2002) and reacts with meat is visually brown and “well done,” yet the IT is not high enough
water to form free radicals such as hydroxyl (OH) (Chirinos and to ensure the inactivation of microbiological pathogens. This condi-
others 2002). Free radicals promote myoglobin oxidation (Giroux tion, termed premature browning, may occur with PSE meats, and
and others 2001), enhancing development of metMb. The addition can be induced by storage in high-oxygen modified atmospheric
of free radical scavengers to beef and pork prior to irradiation has packaging, bulk storage in the frozen state, prolonged thawing, the
been shown to stabilize color (Zhao and Sebranek 1996; Giroux and addition of salts or LFTB, and where beef is irradiated in aerobic con-
others 2001). It has been suggested that the increased redness ob- ditions (Table 1). At the other extreme, there are numerous factors
served in irradiated pork and poultry meats and irradiated vacuum- that prolong pink color in meats, so that they do not appear to be
packaged beef is due to the formation of a carboxy heme pigment, adequately cooked. This condition is more an issue for food quality,
when carbon monoxide produced during irradiation of meat links to where products will be overcooked, and also may bring about eco-
the 6th coordination point in the myoglobin and/or hemoglobin to nomic losses in food service industries through consumer rejection
produce red carboxymyoglobin and/or carboxyhemoglobin (Millar and loss of yield (Table 1).
and others 2002). Nam and Ahn (2002) also propose that irradiation Clearly, all of the factors reviewed in this paper—pH, meat source,
generates reduced conditions that encourage reduction of the myo- packaging, freezing history, fat content, added ingredients, preser-
globin iron, and indeed an oxyMb-like pigment has been detected vation treatments, and cooking method—will combine to holisti-
in vacuum packaged irradiated pork and beef (Nanke and others cally influence the color of cooked meat. Taken independently, the
1998). mechanisms by which the properties of the meat are altered by each
There is insufficient evidence to suggest that preservation treat- of these factors appear to be highly complex and often based on
ments involving pressure generates an issue for food safety, at least hypotheses. Overall, there is little known about the biochemical in-
in beef, as pressure-induced color change appears to be eliminated teractions between myoglobin and other proteins or lipids in meat
with cooking. The persistent pink color of cooked, irradiated pork during the cooking process; understanding these will provide some
and poultry, and in many cases beef irradiated under vacuum, will explanation for the observations summarized in this review. This
more likely be interpreted as undercooking, and the product will be review has identified several information gaps that might be inves-
rejected, or overcooked with subsequent losses in quality. However, tigated further. Good biochemical experimentation might better ex-
premature browning does appear to be an issue for beef irradiated pose the changes in meat induced by pH (e.g., proteins, structure,
in aerobic conditions or after freeze–thaw. myoglobin state) and explain how pH appears to influence the rate of
myoglobin denaturation during cooking. Other questions that arise
from this review are why rapid thawing of frozen meat reduces myo-
Cooking Method
globin denaturation during cooking yet slow thawing increases this,
C ooking method influences the rate of heat transmission
through a meat product and the extent of cooking. There are
publications that report the temperature patterns within meat prod-
how myoglobin denaturation is increased in the presence of salt,
why the changes induced by addition of LFTB are so dependant on
meat pH, and what biochemical processes are responsible for the
ucts cooked using various methods (Chen and Marks 1997; Singh
color changes induced by irradiation. Some of these information
and others 1997; Rhee and others 2003), but only one study was
gaps might be addressed by future research on meat color. The most
identified that compared cooking method with cooked color. Bow-
recent studies reviewed in this article indicate that the direction of
ers and others (1987) observed that the internal color of beef steaks
future research is likely to focus on addressing the need for the meat
cooked to the same IT were visually browner when oven broiled
industry to control meat appearance and spoilage. Specifically, fur-
compared to roasting. This indicates that cooked color could also
ther studies to better understand the oxidation processes in meat
be influenced by the method of cooking, though more studies would
(before and during cooking) and the effect of emerging packaging
be needed to report the extent of this effect.
and preservation technologies are likely.
In summary, the character of raw meat products available to the
Pink Defect consumer at the point of purchase will vary with meat source and
R38 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 71, Nr. 4, 2006 URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org
Does it look cooked? Cooked meat color . . .
the food industry and the domestic consumer. Fortunately for ma- Chen H, Marks B. 1997. Evaluation previous thermal treatment of chicken patties by
visible/near-infrared spectroscopy. J Food Sci 62:753–56, 780.
jor food producers and food service companies, the introduction of Chirinos R, Vizeu D, Teresa Destro M, Franco B, Landgraf M. 2002. Inactivation of
HACCP programs has already established practices where cooking Escherichia coli O157:H7 in hamburgers by gamma irradiation. Brazilian J Microbiol
is monitored through time/temperature methods. However, minor 33:53–6.
Du M, Hur SJ, Ahn DU. 2002. Raw-meat packaging and storage affect the color and
food service companies such as fast food outlets and independent odor of irradiated broiler breast fillets after cooking. Meat Sci 61:49–54.
restaurants often still use visual inspection as the main tool to judge Fletcher DL, Qiao M, Smith DP. 2000. The relationship of raw broiler breast meat color
and pH to cooked meat color and pH. Poultry Sci 79:784–8.
if meat is cooked adequately. Certainly, in domestic homes, use of [FSA] Food Standards Agency. 2006. Safer food, better business. Available from:
food thermometers is minimal. On a global scale, the United States http://www.food.gov.uk/foodindustry/hygiene/sfbb/. London: Food Standards
Agency. Accessed February 21, 2006.
Food Safety and Inspection Service is at the forefront of change Fu A-H, Sebranek J, Murano E. 1995. Survival of Listeria monocytogenes, Yersinia ente-
through their major ThermyTM campaign, which promotes regu- rocolitica and Escherichia coli O157:H7 and quality changes after irradiation of beef
steaks and ground beef. J Food Sci 60:972–7.
lar use of food thermometers and provides instructions for use. The Geileskey A, King R, Corte D, Pinto P, Ledward DA. 1997. The kinetics of cooked meat
campaign has been developed through extensive research on con- haemoprotein, formation in meat and model systems. Meat Sci 48:189–99.
Giroux M, Ouattara B, Yefsah R, Smoragiewicz W, Saucier L, Lacroix M. 2001. Combined
sumer behaviour and social marketing. Other governmental food effect of ascorbic acid and gamma irradiation on microbial and sensorial charac-
regulatory agencies will need to consider research such as has been teristics of beef patties during refrigerated storage. J Agric Food Chem 49:919–25.
Grant I, Patterson M. 1991. Effect of irradiation and modified atmosphere packaging on
summarized in this review, in order to define a consistent message the microbiological and sensory quality of pork stored at refrigeration temperatures.
targeting the safe cooking of meat. Int J Food Sci Tech 26:507–19.
Hague M, Warren K, Hunt M, Kropf D, Kastner C, Stroda S, Johnson D. 1994. End-
point temperature, internal cooked color, and expressible juice color relationships
Acknowledgments in ground beef patties. J Food Sci 59:465–70.
This review was partially funded by the New Zealand Food Safety Holownia K, Chinnan MS, Reynolds AE. 2003. Pink color defect in poultry white meat
as affected by endogenous conditions. J Food Sci 68:742–7.
Authority. We also acknowledge Dr. Mustafa Farouk for assisting with Hunt MC, Sørheim O, Slinde E. 1999. Color and heat denaturation of myoglobin forms
manuscript preparation. in ground beef. J Food Sci 64:847–51.
[ICMSF] International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods. 1998.
Microorganisms in foods 6: microbial ecology of food commodities. London: Blackie
Academic & Professional. p 615.
Jackson T, Acuff G, Dickson J. 1997. Meat, poultry and seafood. In: Doyle M, Beuchat L,
Montville T, editors. Food Microbiology: Fundamentals and frontiers. Washington,
References D.C.: ASM Press. p 83–100.
Adams M, Moss M. 2000. Food microbiology. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry. Jay J. 1996. Modern food microbiology. New York: Chapman & Hall. p 661.
p 479. Jo C, Jin S, Ahn DU. 2000. Colour changes in irradiated cooked pork sausage with
Baron C, Andersen H. 2002. Myoglobin-induced lipid oxidation. A review. J Agric Food different fat sources and packaging during storage. Meat Sci 55:107–13.
Chem 50:3887–97. John L, Cornforth D, Carpenter C, Sorheim O, Pettee B, Whittier D. 2004. Comparison
Barot MS, Mosenthal AC, Bokkenhauser VD. 1983. Location of Campylobacter jejuni of color and thiobarbituric acid values of cooked hamburger patties after storage of
in infected chicken livers. J Clin Microbiol 17:921–2. fresh beef chubs in modified atmospheres. J Food Sci 69:608–14.
Ben Abdallah M, Marchello J, Ahmad H. 1999. Effect of freezing and microbial growth John L, Cornforth D, Carpenter C, Sorheim O, Pettee B, Whittier D. 2005. Color and
on myoglobin derivatives of beef. J Agric Food Chem 47:4093–9. thiobarbituric acid values of cooked top sirloin steaks packaged in modified atmo-
Berry B. 1994. Fat level, high temperature cooking and degree of doneness affect sen- spheres of 80% oxygen, or 0.4% carbon monoxide, or vacuum. Meat Sci 69:441–9.
sory, chemical, and physical properties of beef patties. J Food Sci 59:10–14, 19. Jung S, Ghoul M, de Lamballerie-Anton M. 2003. Influence of high pressure on the
Berry B. 1998. Cooked color in high pH beef patties as related to fat content and cooking color and microbial quality of beef meat. Lebensm-Wiss u-Technol 36:625–31.
from the frozen or thawed state. J Food Sci 63:797–800. Killinger K, Hunt MC, Campbell R, Kropf DH. 2000. Factors affecting premature brown-
Berry BW, Bigner-George ME. 2000. Factors affecting color properties of beef patties ing during cooking of store-purchased ground beef. J Food Sci 65:585–7.
cooked on an outdoor gas grill. J Muscle Foods 11:213–26. Kusmider E, Sebranek J, Lonergan S, Honeyman M. 2002. Effects of carbon monox-
Berry B, Lyon BG, Soderberg D, Clinch N. 2001. Relationships among chemical, cooking ide packaging on color and lipid stability of irradiated ground beef. J Food Sci 67:
and color properties of beef patties cooked to four internal temperatures. J Muscle 3463–8.
Foods 12:219–36. Lien R, Hunt M, Anderson S, Kropf D, Loughin T, Dikeman M, Velazco J. 2002a. Effects
Boulianne M, King A. 1998. Meat color and biochemical characteristics of unacceptable of endpoint temperature on the internal color of pork loin chops of different quality.
dark-colored broiler chicken carcasses. J Food Sci 63:759–62. J Food Sci 67:1007–10.
Bowers J, Craig J, Kropf DH, Tucker T. 1987. Flavor, color, and other characteristics Lien R, Hunt M, Anderson S, Kropf D, Loughin T, Dikeman M, Velazco J. 2002b. Effects
of beef longissimus muscle heated to seven internal temperatures between 55 and of endpoint temperature on the internal color of pork patties of different myoglobin
85◦ C. J Food Sci 52:533–6. form, initial cooking state, and quality. J Food Sci 67:1011–5.
Brewer MS, Novakofski J. 1999. Cooking rate, pH and final endpoint temperature effects Liu M, Berry B. 1996. Variability in color, cooking times, and internal temperature of
on color and cook loss of a lean ground beef model system. Meat Sci 52:443–51. beef patties under controlled cooking conditions. J Food Prot 59:969–75.
URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org Vol. 71, Nr. 4, 2006—JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE R39
Does it look cooked? Cooked meat color . . .
R: Concise Reviews in Food Science
Lyon BG, Lyon CE. 2002. Color of uncooked and cooked broiler leg quarters associated Seyfert M, Kropf D, Hunt M. 2004b. Final cooked temperature effects of ground pork
with chilling temperature and holding time. Poultry Sci 81:1916–20. on its ability to react with nitrite. J Food Sci 69:506–10.
Lyon BG, Berry B, Soderberg D, Clinch N. 2000. Visual colour and doneness indicators Singh RP, Pan Z, Vijayan J. 1997. Use of predictive modelling in hamburger cooking.
and the incidence of premature brown color in beef patties cooked to four end point Food Aust 49:526–31.
temperatures. J Food Prot 63:1389–98. Swan JE, Boles JA. 2002. Processing characteristics of beef roasts made from high and
Lyon BG, Davies C, Windham W, Lyon C. 2001. Acid phosphatase activity and color normal pH bull inside rounds. Meat Sci 62:399–403.
changes in consumer-style griddle-cooked ground beef patties. J Food Prot 64:1199– Trout G. 1989. Variation in myoglobin denaturation and color of cooked beef, pork,
205. and turkey meat as influenced by pH, sodium chloride, sodium tripolyphosphate,
Lytras GN, Geileskey A, King RD, Ledward DA. 1999. Effect of muscle type, salt and and cooking temperature. J Food Sci 54:536–44.
pH on cooked meat haemoprotein formation in lamb and beef. Meat Sci 52:189– Troutt E, Hunt M, Johnson D, Claus J, Kastner C, Kropf D. 1992a. Characteristics of
94. low-fat ground beef containing texture-modifying ingredients. J Food Sci 57:19–24.
Mancini RA, Kropf DH, Hunt MC, Johnson DE. 2005. Effects of endpoint temperature, Troutt E, Hunt M, Johnson D, Claus J, Kastner C, Kropf D, Stroda SL. 1992b. Chemical,
pH, and storage time on cooked internal color reversion of pork longissimus chops. physical and sensory characterization of ground beef containing 5 to 30 percent fat.
J Muscle Foods 16:16–26. J Food Sci 57:25–9.
Marksberry C. 1990. The effect of fat level, pH, carcass maturity and compaction on [USDA] United States Department of Agriculture. 1998. An FSIS/ARS study: Premature
the cooked internal color of ground beef patties at five end-point temperatures. [MS browning of cooked ground beef. Washington, D.C.: Food Safety and Inspection
thesis, Unpublished, 120 p.]. Manhattan: Kansas State University. Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Available from: http://www.fsis.
McCurdy S, Hillers VN, Cann S. 2005. Consumer reaction and interest in using food usda.gov/ophs/prebrown.htm. Accessed January 27, 2006.
thermometers when cooking small or thin meat items. Food Prot Trends 25:826–31. [USDA] United States Department of Agriculture. 2005. Food safety education:
Mendenhall V. 1989. Effect of pH and total pigment concentration on the internal color is it done yet? Washington, D.C.: Food Safety and Inspection Service, United
of cooked ground beef patties. J Food Sci 54:1–2. States Department of Agriculture. Available from: http://www.fsis.usda.gov/Is It
Millar S, Moss B, Stevenson M. 2002. The effect of ionising radiation on the colour of Done Yet/index.asp. Accessed January 27, 2006.
leg and breast of poultry meat. Meat Sci 55:361–70. [USDHHS] United States Department of Health and Human Services. 2005. Food code
Monahan F, Skibsted L, Andersen M. 2005. Mechanisms of oxymyoglobin oxidation in 2005. College Park, Md.: United States Department of Health and Human Services,
the presence of oxidizing lipids in bovine muscle. J Agric Food Chem 53:5734–8. Public Health Service, Food and Drug Administration.
Moore JE, Madden RH. 1998. Occurrence of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in Van Laack R, Berry B, Solomon M. 1996a. Effect of precooking conditions on color of
porcine liver in Northern Ireland. J Food Prot 61:409–13. cooked beef patties. J Food Prot 59:976–83.
Nam KC, Ahn DU. 2002. Carbon monoxide-heme pigment is responsible for the pink Van Laack R, Berry B, Solomon M. 1996b. Variations in internal color of cooked beef
color in irradiated raw turkey breast meat. Meat Sci 60:25–33. patties. J Food Sci 61:410–4.
Nanke K, Sebranek J, Olson D. 1998. Color characteristics of irradiated vacuum- Van Laack R, Berry B, Solomon M. 1997. Cooked color of patties processed from various
packaged pork, beef, and turkey. J Food Sci 63:1001–6. combinations of normal or high pH beef and lean finely textured beef. J Muscle Foods
Peirson M, Ryland D, Holley R. 2005. Color of low dose-irradiated ground beef before 8:287–99.
and after cooking to 60 ◦ C or 71 ◦ C and survival of E. coli O157:H7 in irradiated Varnam A, Sutherland J. 1995. Meat and meat products. London: Chapman & Hall.
patties. Food Prot Trends 25:991–9. p 430.
Qiao M, Fletcher DL, Smith DP, Northcutt JK. 2002. Effects of raw broiler breast meat Warren K, Hunt MC, Kropf DH. 1996a. Myoglobin oxidative state affects internal cooked
color variation on marination and cooked meat quality. Poultry Sci 81:276–80. color development in ground beef patties. J Food Sci 61:513–9.
Rhee M-S, Lee S-Y, Hillers VN, McCurdy S, Kang D-H. 2003. Evaluation of consumer- Warren KE, Hunt MC, Kropf DH, Hague MA, Waldner CL, Stroda SL, Kastner CL. 1996b.
style cooking methods for reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in ground beef. J Chemical properties of ground beef patties exhibiting normal and premature brown
Food Prot 66:1030–4. internal cooked color. J Muscle Foods 7:303–14.
Seyfert M, Hunt MC, Mancini RA, Kropf DH, Stroda SL. 2004a. Internal prema- Warriss P. 2000. Meat science: an introductory text. Oxon: CABI Publishing. p 310.
ture browning in cooked steaks from enhanced beef round muscles packaged in Zhao Y, Sebranek J. 1996. Physicochemical and sensory qualities of fresh pork chops
high-oxygen and ultra-low oxygen modified atmospheres. J Food Sci 69:FCT142– as affected by phosphate, ascorbate or sorbate dipping prior to irradiation. J Food
FCT146. Sci 61:1281–4.
R40 JOURNAL OF FOOD SCIENCE—Vol. 71, Nr. 4, 2006 URLs and E-mail addresses are active links at www.ift.org