Peer Review 3
Peer Review 3
REMEMBER: “You are not the writer, you’re a reader. One of many… Writers write, readers read and
show what they are understanding, and maybe make suggestions… You’re there to play back to the
writer how you read their paper; what you go from it; what you found interesting; where you were
confused; where you wanted more…” (Straub, Responding – Really Responding – to other Students’
Writing, 163)
Instructions: For each peer review paper assigned to you, answer the following questions completely.
When finished, rename your peer review worksheet, and upload/attach the finished peer review
worksheet to the corresponding peer’s COMMENT section of the peer review in Canvas.
INTRODUCTION
Hook
Does the introduction have a hook? If yes, what kind of hook is the author using? How effective is the
hook? Does it grab your attention and make you want to read on? If not, suggest an appropriate revision
or a different hook.
Context
What type of background information does the writer use to set the context of the paper (bridge the
hook with the thesis)? After having read the entire paper, consider how well the rest of the paper is
related to this section of the introduction, how might this “context setting” part be improved, in your
opinion?
- you do provide a general trend and its concerning impact as the context.
- the text connects well with the paper’s main focus.
Thesis Statement
Is there a thesis at the end of the introduction paragraph? Does the thesis clearly state the topic, and
indicate if the paper will be discussing causes or effects, and/or what these causes/effects are? What
type of cause/effect language is the writer using?
Organization
Is the essay clearly organized? Is it coherent (all ideas are related, effectively organized, easy to follow)?
- the essay is clearly organized with 3 main points with 3 different body paragaphs
- each paragraph address a different negaitve impacts of social media
it is quite easy to follow
Topic Sentences
What points (causes/effects) are explained in the body paragraphs? Are they clearly stated in the topic
sentence for the paragraph?
- the topic sentences clearly introduce the main idea of each paragraph:
“To begin with, the first problem with social media is that it often creates an
environment which contribute to teenagers committing harmful self-comparisons,
leading to dissatisfaction of themselves.”: talks about negative self-comparisons
“Secondly, social media is anonymity and size can initiate online harassment which has a
devastating effect on the young teenager’s mental health.”: talks about cyberbullying
“For the third and last point, social media’s addictive nature can destroy teen’s daily life,
leading to unbalance between the virtual and real world and contributing to social
anxiety and depression.”: talks about social media addictive
Does each body paragraph topic sentence clearly state the cause or effect (topic + controlling idea)? How
could they be improved?
How well do the supporting ideas for each cause or effect and the subsequent details and/or examples in
the paragraph support the essay’s points? Explain and offer suggestions.
- you do include specific examples, well-researched researches, and real-life examples to back up
your points.
- however, there are some examples that should be more concise to avoid overwhelming the
readers.
- and try to use different words because there are some repetitive words
Does the author use appropriate transitions within the essay? Give examples. Do you have any
suggestions to improve the paper’s cohesion?
Is the thesis of the paper paraphrased in the conclusion? Is it an appropriate restatement of the thesis?
How could it be improved?
- the conclusion does summarize the main points but only by listing out.
- I think you should enhance your synthesis by showing how the main points can connect to the
theme
Does the conclusion have a “good night kiss” – a final thought or call to action? If not, would you
recommend one?
Does the write include any “new” information in the conclusion? If so, what would you suggest?
Is the paper easy to read? Why? What type of revisions would you suggest?
- the paper is easy to read because it has a clear structure and logical transitions between
sections.
- you can try to break down your long sentences so that it can increase the readability.
- you can try to use synonyms to avoid repetitions
Are there any grammatical errors in the paper? Point a few of them out.
FINAL COMMENTS
Where might research and information from credible, authoritative sources support the author’s ideas
better and make the paper more credible? What type of information would be required to better
support the author’s perspectives (where do you want more)? Name at least 3 places in the paper where
research could help further support the writer’s claims.
- I think you have enough credible sources.
paragraph 1: statistics or psychological studies on peer influence and role modeling.
paragraph 2: studies or testimonials from victims of cyberbullying who withdraw from
social media.
paragraph 3: studies on how specific social media habits interfere with study time and
cognitive performance