Chapter 1
Chapter 1
CHAPTER 1
1. ROUTE SURVEYING
1.1. INTRODUCTION
Route surveying includes all the surveying activates required to plan, design, and layout
(construct) any "Long and narrow" transportation facility. This transportation facility could be
road (high way), railways, and pipeline and power transmission lines.
Highway and railroad routes are chosen only after a complete and detailed study of all possible
alignments. Route selection usually involves the use of air photos, satellite imagery, and ground
surveys as well as the analysis of existing plans and maps. The route selected should satisfy all
design requirements with minimal social, environmental, and financial impact. Alignment is the
position or the layout of the central line of the highway generally there are two Types of
alignment. Those are:-
1. Reconnaissance survey
2. Preliminary location survey
3. Data collection (topographic data).
4. Final location survey
1. Reconnaissance survey
It is a first (preliminary) field inspection of the entire area to be surveyed in terms of existing
control points, possible site for new observations, detection of possible obstacles and solutions,
type of instrument to be used, estimation of the duration of the whole fieldwork, and collection
of information regarding communication, water, food, labour and health facilities. In
reconnaissance the surveyor goes over the area and decides best plan of working. The purpose
of the reconnaissance survey is to evaluate the feasibility of one or more corridor routes for a
highway between specific points that may be many kilometers away.
• Subdivision of reconnaissance
A) Desk study
B) Field study
A) Desk study
Study all available information in the office,
• Aerial Photography
• Geological maps
• Topographic Map
• Published literatures:
B) Field study
It involves inspection of each band (identified during the desk study) to determine the most
corridor feasible route based on some basic criteria.
• Soil type and depth
• Slope stability
• Percentage of rock in excavation
• Terrain classification
• Bridging requirements etc…
2. Preliminary Location Survey
Is a large- scale study of one or more feasible corridor routes. Consists of running an accurate
traverse line along the routes already recommended as a result of reconnaissance survey. During
Preliminary Survey we establishing horizontal and vertical control points that is the most
essential part in topographic surveying since the three dimensional coordinates (X, Y, Z) of each
point to be surveyed can only be determined with respect to well established reference points.
This is done if the area has no control points or the existing control network is not dense enough.
The most common way of establishing control points are traversing and/or satellite technology
(GPS) is applied for establishing reference points and also with a level, the elevations of the
traverse stations are determined.
In this stage we collect elevation, slope, and feature data (e.g., trees, buildings)
The purpose of the final location is to fix the centerline of the selected alignment in the field and
to collect additional data for design and preparation of the drawings. If the preliminary survey
has been done properly the data collection work during the final alignment survey will be
limited.
The following are the general features of the final location survey
pegging the centre line
Centre line leveling
Cross section
Intersecting roads
Ditches and streams
1.5. SELECTING THE ROAD ALIGNMENT
When constructing a new road, there are several possible choices of alignments. Although the
shortest connection between two points is a straight line, the road alignment will very seldom be
entirely straight. for various reasons:
(a) A straight and short alignment may cross through villages, farms or other public or private
property. In most cases, this is not acceptable as it would destroy crops, buildings or public
facilities;
(b) In rolling, hilly or mountainous terrain, the gradients on a straight alignment would often be
too steep or the earthworks required excessive;
(c) The straight alignment may pass through extremely difficult terrain (rocks, dense forest,
swamps, etc.) which should be avoided to minimize construction costs;
(d) If a river or other obstacle has to be crossed, another alignment may be necessary in order to
find a crossing at the most suitable location;
(e) By choosing a slightly longer alignment, the road can be constructed on a soil type more
suitable for road construction.
In addition, the choice of alignment may be influenced by the location of suitable sources of
water and the location of gravel deposits.
When rural roads are built to provide access, existing tracks should be followed whenever
possible to minimize earthworks.
It is also sensible to first make sure that all interested parties agree on the route and places to be
linked by a new or rehabilitated road. Where several alignments are possible, the engineer will
decide on the detailed design after considering:
(a) Construction costs - e.g. an alignment of a certain length with steep gradients up to 20 percent
(Alignment 1) will be cheaper to construct than an alignment of the same length with gradients
up to 5 percent (Alignment 2). For the latter, the necessary earthworks will be far more
extensive. Try to avoid steep side long ground even if the existing road is cut into it. Although it
is possible to overcome the problem, any solution is expensive in terms of labour, materials and
finance. Route selection is therefore important. If possible, relocate the line lower down the hill
side where the ground is flatter.
(b) Costs to future traffic - these costs will be greater for Alignment 1 than for Alignment 2.
More energy is used to climb/descend steep gradients and will cause more wear to brakes.
Stronger means of transport will be required for Alignment 1. For village roads, it is to assume
that these may become market roads as the country develops. Steep gradients should therefore be
avoided.
(c) Maintenance costs - the costs to maintain steep gradients are considerably higher than the
costs to maintain gentle gradients.
(d) Social costs and benefits - in many cases, the higher construction costs of a longer alignment
may be justified if the road also serves public facilities (e.g. school, health centre).
The engineer also has to consider existing land use and to whom the land belongs. Although
compensation arrangements would normally be made, careful consideration of all possible
alternatives at the design stage may avoid such issues.
(e) Watershed route - normally cross drainage is expensive but can be avoided if the road follows
the line of the watershed. Ditching may then be unnecessary and considerable cost savings will
derive. It is therefore advantageous, where possible, to locate and use the watershed route.
From the survey, quantities of work can be derived, soil conditions observed and productivity
norms assumed. The line as established by the surveyor must be clearly defined to facilitate
construction.
It is important to stress, however, that during the survey the subsequent end product must be
borne in mind. For a new road to be built by labor-based methods and likely to carry low traffic
volumes, the alignment selected should reflect this. A high speed alignment is irrelevant and
expensive. Undulating vertical curvature and comparatively sharp curves are more compatible
with low volume roads. The objective of such a survey is to refine actual position and
dimensions of the road. The survey and methods used should be simplified without prejudicing
the level of accuracy desired.
There are a number of appropriate methods for setting out the road alignment. The surveying
equipment required is based on the setting out methods chosen. When choosing a specific
method of surveying, it is important to bear in mind the required level of accuracy for the works.
Obviously, the requirements of a rural road may not be the same as for major highways or city
streets. Bearing this in mind, there are some low-cost but still accurate enough methods of setting
out rural road alignments.