English I Course Manual 2024-25 (Compulsory Course)
English I Course Manual 2024-25 (Compulsory Course)
Fall 2024
(AY 2024-25)
Faculty Members
PART I
General Information……………………………………………………………… Page 3
PART II
a. Course Description…………………………………………………………… Page 4
b. Course Aims……………………………………………………………………. Page 4
c. Intended Learning Outcomes…………………………………………… Page 4
d. Grading of Student Achievement……………………………………… Pages 5-6
PART III
a. Keyword Syllabus…………………………………………………………. Page 6
b. Course Policies……………………………………………………………… Pages 6-7
PART IV
a. Weekly Course Outline …………………………………………………. Page 8
b. Readings with Objectives……………………………………………… Pages 9-12
PART V
Details of Assessment……………………………………………………….. Pages 12-13
2
PART I
General Information
This information shall form part of the University database and may be
uploaded to the KOHA Library system and catalogued and may be distributed
amongst first year Law students for B.A.LL.B. (Hons), B.B.A.LL.B. (Hons);
B.Com. LL.B. (Hons), B.A. (Hons) Legal Studies, B.A. (Hons) Criminology
and Criminal Justice; LL.B.; and LL.M. courses if necessary.
PRE-REQUISITES: None
PRE-CURSORS: None
3
PART II
a. Course Description
In this course, the students will engage with the principles of critical thinking, sound
reasoning and argumentation through a close examination of literary texts. While we all
may think, not many of us think critically. This is a process that requires training and
development of specific skills – analysing information, evaluating arguments and
opinions, and solving problems. Through a series of reading, writing, and oral
assignments, the course will familiarise students with the mechanics of close reading,
and the relationship between language and logic in examining arguments. The course
also aims to introduce students to the conventions of academic writing and business
communication.
b. Course Aims
4
d. Grading of Student Achievement
To pass this course, students must obtain a minimum of 40% in the cumulative aspects
of coursework, i.e., internal assessment (including moot, mid-term exam, internal
assignment) and end term examination. End of semester exam will carry 50 marks
out of which students have to obtain a minimum of 15 marks to fulfil the
requirement of passing the course.
The details of the grades as well as the criteria for awarding such grades are provided
below:
PERCENTAGE GRADE
GRADE GRADE DESCRIPTION
OF MARKS VALUE
Outstanding – Exceptional knowledge of the
subject matter, thorough understanding of
80 and above O 8 issues; ability to synthesize ideas, rules and
principles and extraordinary critical and
analytical ability
Excellent - Sound knowledge of the subject
matter, thorough understanding of issues;
75 – 79 A+ 7.5
ability to synthesize ideas, rules and principles
and critical and analytical ability
Very Good - Sound knowledge of the subject
matter, excellent organizational capacity,
70 – 74 A 7 ability to synthesize ideas, rules and principles,
critically analyze existing materials and
originality in thinking and presentation
Good - Good understanding of the subject
matter, ability to identify issues and provide
65 – 69 A- 6
balanced solutions to problems and good
critical and analytical skills
Fair – Average understanding of the subject
matter, limited ability to identify issues and
60 – 64 B+ 5
provide solutions to problems and reasonable
critical and analytical skills
Acceptable - Adequate knowledge of the
55 – 59 B 4 subject matter to go to the next level of study
and reasonable critical and analytical skills.
Marginal - Limited knowledge of the subject
50 – 54 B- 3 matter and irrelevant use of materials and, poor
critical and analytical skills
Pass 1 – Pass with basic understanding of the
45 – 49 P1 2
subject matter
Pass 2 – Pass with rudimentary
40 – 44 P2 1
understanding of the subject matter
5
PERCENTAGE GRADE
GRADE GRADE DESCRIPTION
OF MARKS VALUE
Fail - Poor comprehension of the subject
matter; poor critical and analytical skills and
Below 40 F 0
marginal use of the relevant materials. Will
require repeating the course
Absent - “Extenuating circumstances”
preventing the student from taking the end-
semester, or re-sit, examination as the case may
be; the Vice Dean (Examinations) at their
Absent Ab 0 discretion assign the “Ab” grade. If an "Ab"
grade is assigned, the student would appear for
the end-semester, or re-sit examination, as the
case may be, as and when the subsequent
opportunity is provided by the University.
PART III
a. Keyword Syllabus
Critical thinking, logic and language, sound reasoning, literary reading, academic
writing, communication skills, storytelling, close reading, interpretation
b. Course/Class Policies
6
Disability Support and Accommodation Requirements
JGU endeavours to make all its courses inclusive and accessible to students with different
abilities. In accordance with the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act (2016), the JGU
Disability Support Committee (DSC) has identified conditions that could hinder a
student’s overall well-being. These include physical and mobility related difficulties,
visual and hearing impairment, mental health conditions and intellectual/learning
difficulties e.g., dyslexia, dyscalculia. Students with any known disability needing
academic and other support are required to register with the Disability Support
Committee (DSC) by following the procedure specified at https://jgu.edu.in/disability-
support-committee/
Students who need support may register before the deadline for registration ends, as
communicated by the DSC via email each semester. Those students who wish to continue
receiving support from the previous semester, must re-register every semester prior to
the deadline for re-registration as communicated by the DSC via email. Last minute
registrations and support are discouraged and might not be possible as sufficient time is
required to make the arrangements for support.
The DSC maintains strict confidentiality about the identity of the student and the nature
of their disability and the same is requested from faculty members and staff as well. The
DSC takes a strong stance against in-class and out-of-class references made about a
student’s disability without their consent and disrespectful comments referring to a
student’s disability. With due respect for confidentiality, faculty and students are
encouraged to have honest conversations about the needs of students with disabilities and
to discuss how a course may be better tailored to cater to a student with disability.
This course may discuss a range of issues and events that might result in distress for some
students. Discussions in the course might also provoke strong emotional responses. To
make sure that all students collectively benefit from the course, and do not feel disturbed
due to either the content of the course or the conduct of the discussions. Therefore, it is
incumbent upon all within the classroom to pledge to maintain respect towards our peers.
This does not mean that you need to feel restrained about what you feel and what you
want to say. Conversely, this is about creating a safe space where everyone can speak and
learn without inhibitions and fear. This responsibility lies not only with students but also
with the instructor.
P.S. The course instructor, as part of introducing the course manual, will discuss the scope
of the Safe Space Pledge with the class.
7
PART IV
READING POETRY
Week 5
(LISTENING SKILLS & CRITICAL THINKING)
Week 15 REVISION
8
b. Readings with Objectives
WEEKS 1 & 2
WEEKS 3 & 4
INTRODUCTION TO STORYTELLING
WEEK 5
READING POETRY
9
Reading (any one of the following):
1. ‘The quality of mercy is not strained’ from The Merchant of Venice by William
Shakespeare and ‘Let me not to the marriage of true minds’, Sonnet 116, by William
Shakespeare
2. ‘An Introduction’ by Kamala Das
3. ‘The Sunshine Cat’ by Kamala Das
4. ‘Megan Married Herself’ by Caroline Bird
5. ‘Theme for English B’ by Langston Hughes
WEEKS 6 & 7
Readings:
1. Chapters 7, 8 and 9 from The Craft of Research, Third Edition (Chicago Guides to
Writing, Editing, and Publishing) by Wayne C Booth, Gregory G. Colomb, Joseph M.
Williams (2008).
2. Handouts on ‘Overview of the Academic Essay’, ‘Developing a Thesis’, ‘Plagiarism in
Academic Writing’ and ‘Citation Guide’.
WEEK 8
▪ Components of a five-paragraph-essay
▪ Searching for sources and practising citation
WEEK 9
10
▪ Understanding Arguments
▪ Four types of informal fallacies as part of everyday communication and academic
writing:
a) Fallacies of relevance
b) Fallacies of defective induction
c) Fallacies of presumption
d) Fallacies of ambiguity
Readings:
1. Chapter 4 from Introduction to Logic, Fourteenth edition, by Irving M. Copi, Carl
Cohen and Kenneth McMahon (2014).
2. Chapters 6, 7 and 8 from Critical Thinking Skills: Developing Effective Analysis and
Argument, Second edition, by Stella Cottrell (2011).
WEEKS 10 & 11
WEEK 12
Particular attention will be given to Cover Letters, Grant and Internship Letters.
11
Readings:
1. Chapter 6 from Business Communication by P. Subba Rao, B. Anita Kumar and C.
Hima Bindu (2012).
2. Unit 2 from Essentials of Business Communication by Mary Ellen Guffey and Dana
Loewy (2022).
3. Handouts on ‘Basics of Business Letters’, ‘Accentuating the Positives’, ‘Job
Applications’, ‘Internship Cover Letters’, and ‘Grant Letters I & II’
WEEKS 13 & 14
▪ Evaluate the claims made by the author and formulate a map of the argument in
the texts
▪ Locate instances of contradictions in the texts
▪ Learn to use critics to acknowledge as well as assess their claims about the text
▪ Engage in a synoptical reading of the texts and develop a comparative analysis of
the author’s claims
WEEK 15
REVISION
PART V
Details of Assessment
The course will evaluate student performance and learning outcomes based on at least
two internal assessments and a final examination. Assessments will include all
four components of communication: listening, speaking, reading, and writing.
Internal Assessments: 50% of the total marks for the course. Internal assessments
may include individual and/or group assignments designed by individual faculty
members. The details of the assignments and relevant dates/timelines for the same will
be announced by respective faculty members.
12
One assignment will be based on writing a five-paragraph essay between 800-1000
words citing at least two academic sources (word count excludes citations). Topics for
the essay will be decided in consultation with respective course instructors.
Individual faculty may incorporate class participation as part of the internal assessment.
Class participation marks will not exceed 5% of the total marks for the course.
13