ECO 307 - Chapter 6 - Narrative Report
ECO 307 - Chapter 6 - Narrative Report
Submitted by:
Dimaandal, Bea Mari B.
Dimaano, Nica Mae M.
Dongon, Almira Eunice A.
Ebreo, Ronalyn Angel A.
Fajilan, Kimberly Mae M.
Ramirez, Lovely Raisa D.
Veran, Claudine Joy E.
BSA-3101
2024
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
Perfect competition or pure competition is an idealized market condition where many sellers
compete to offer the best prices and large sellers have no advantages over smaller ones.
(Hayes, 2024)
It is only a theoretical market structure in which there are no monopolies. Meaning, it is only a
representation of a perfect market condition where no single firm is dominating the market. We
should know that this condition rarely occurs in real-world markets and we are only using it as a
model to give us an idea how supply and demand affect prices and behavior in a market
economy.
Buyer acts as a price taker. The buyer takes the price as given and decides the amount
to purchase that best serves the utility of her household.
In this type of market, there are lots of buyers, and each one makes up only a tiny part of
the total demand. Since each buyer’s purchases are so small compared to the whole
market, no single buyer can affect the price of the product. They have to accept the
market price as it is and decide how much to buy based on that price. Consumer
behavior is insignificant to the pricing of the market.
Seller acts as a price taker. The seller takes the price as given and decides the amount
to produce that will generate the greatest profit.
Just like with buyers, there are also many sellers in the market, and each one
contributes only a small portion to the overall supply. This means that no single seller
can influence the market price either. Sellers accept the market price and choose how
much they want to produce and sell to maximize their profit.
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
3. Firms that sell in the market are free to either enter or exit the market.
New sellers are free to enter the market if they think they can make a profit, and existing
sellers can leave the market if it’s no longer profitable for them.
This assumption provides minimal or even non-existent barriers to entry and exit. Free
entry and exit prevent any single firm from dominating the market. If one firm makes
abnormally high profits, other firms will be enticed to also enter the market, increasing
the supply and demand, and driving the prices down until the profits of the firm return to
a normal level. This cycle keeps prices competitive and prevents monopolies or
excessive profits.
4. The goods sold by all sellers in the market are assumed to be homogeneous.
This means every seller sells the same good, or stated another way, the buyer does not
care which seller he uses if all sellers charge the same price.
5. Buyers and sellers in the market are assumed to have perfect information.
Both buyers and sellers know everything about the market. Sellers know what other
sellers can do and the resources they use, and both buyers and sellers are aware of the
prices everyone else is charging.
The consequence of the preceding assumptions is that all exchanges in a perfectly competitive
market will quickly converge to a single price.
We should know na even though all firms charge the same price, they might not earn the same
profit because not all have the same costs.
For example, Firm 1 uses machinery while Firm 2 uses manual labor in producing a 10-peso
product. Obviously, Firm 2 will cost more to produce than Firm 1. Let’s say Firm 2’s cost was 8
pesos while Firm 1’s is 5 pesos. Firm 1 will derive to a profit of 5 pesos while Firm 2 will only
have 2 pesos even though they both sold the product for 10 pesos.
This shows that, in the short run, not all firms earn the same profit, even though they all charge
the same market price. Consequently, not all the firms would be able to justify remaining in the
market if the market price were to remain the same, unless they were able to adapt their
production to match the more successful operators.
In a long-run perfect competition market scenario, firms experience conditions vastly different
from those in the short-run. In the short-run, firms face certain fixed or "sunk" costs and have
limited flexibility in adjusting all aspects of their production. However, the long run allows firms to
fully adjust their operations, scale, and strategies to achieve optimal efficiency, affecting
economic profits, pricing strategies, and overall market dynamics.
To better understand the Perfect Competition in the Long Run, here's the Key Points to
remember:
Therefore, only the most cost-effective firms survive since the long-run equilibrium in perfect
competition drives the firms to operate at a minimum efficient scale that matches production
cost with prices and results in earning at only normal profits.
In a competitive market, both firm and market supply curves help explain how producers
respond to changes in price. The firm supply curve shows the production decisions of a single
firm, while the market supply curve aggregates the responses of all firms in the market.
In essence, the firm supply curve captures the price-quantity relationship for individual firms,
however , it may vary in size, production technology, and cost structure, causing individual
supply curves to differ slightly. While the market supply curve aggregates the responses of all
firms in the market, and regardless of differences of firms, the overall market supply curve
typically slopes upward as price and quantity supplied increase in response to potential
profitability.
To better understand the difference between the two curves, suppose there is a market for
apples.
In the market for apples, the market supply curve represents the combined supply from all apple
farmers. If each farmer is willing to supply a certain amount of apples at various price points, the
total market supply is the sum of these individual quantities. For instance, at $1 per pound, each
farmer supplies 100 pounds, leading to a market supply of 10,000 pounds if there are 100
farmers. As prices increase, so does the quantity supplied by the collective market.
- At a price of $1 per pound, the farm will produce 100 pounds of apples.
- At a price of $2 per pound, the farm will produce 150 pounds of apples.
- At a price of $3 per pound, the farm will produce 200 pounds of apples.
For an individual apple farm, the firm supply curve shows how many apples this single farm will
supply at different price levels. If prices are low, the farm may only supply a smaller amount. As
prices increase, the farm can cover higher production costs and thus increase its supply,
forming an upward-sloping supply curve.
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
In any marketplace, interactions between buyers and sellers determine the dynamics of supply
and demand. To understand this interaction, it's essential to define the following key terms:
● Market: The environment where buyers and sellers engage in the exchange of goods
and services, influenced by varying levels of supply and demand.
● Equilibrium: A state of balance where opposing forces are equal, resulting in stability.
● Market Equilibrium: The specific point at which buyers and sellers reach a state of
balance. Here, the quantity of goods demanded by consumers equals the quantity
supplied by producers.
Suppose that in the market for pencils the market demand is given by the linear demand
function QD = 10 - p and the market supply is equal to QS = 2p - 2. In equilibrium, the number of
pencils that the sellers want to sell has to be equal to the number of pencils that the buyers want
to buy, i.e., quantity supplied has to be equal to the quantity demanded, or QD = QS. For the
demand and supply function of our example this means
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
10 - p = 2p - 2.
Now we only have to solve p to find the equilibrium price.
10 - p = 2p - 2
10 + 2 = 2p + p
12 = 3p
12 3𝑝
3
= 3
p=4
To find the corresponding equilibrium quantity, we substitute p back into either the demand or
supply function:
Demand: QD = 10 - p Supply: QS = 2p - 2
= 10 - 4 = 2(4) - 2
QD = 6 =8-2
QS = 6
Thus, in our market for pencils the equilibrium price is equal to 4, and at this price the quantity
exchanged is equal to 6 units.
One answer to this question was provided by the person who is often described as the first
economist, Adam Smith. Smith ascribed the mechanism that moves a market to equilibrium as
a force he called the invisible hand. This metaphor describes how self-interested individuals
unknowingly contribute to the economic equilibrium through their actions. Even though they aim
to maximize their own gains, they help allocate resources efficiently in response to market
signals, leading the market towards equilibrium.
If the market price is higher than the equilibrium price, sellers will initially respond with increased
rates of production but will realize that buyers are not willing to purchase all the goods available.
This means that the quantity supplied exceeds the quantity demanded - a situation called
excess supply or surplus. Coming back to our example: if the price p = 6 per pencil, the
quantity that sellers want to sell is equal to 10, while the quantity demanded is equal to 4 and
there is an excess supply of 10 - 4 = 6 units.
Demand: QD = 10 - p Supply: QS = 2p - 2
= 10 - 6 = 2(6) - 2
QD = 4 = 12 - 2
QS = 10
The price is considered so high for the buyers to purchase the product. This implies that there
are many sellers who would like to sell at the market price of 6, but are unable to find a buyer.
This causes some sellers to consider lowering the price slightly to make a sale of goods that
would otherwise go unsold. Seeing this is successful in encouraging more demand, and due to
buyers being able to shift their consumption to the lower priced sellers, all sellers will be forced
to accept the lower price. As a result, some sellers will produce less based on the change in
their firm supply curve and other sellers may shut down entirely, so the total market supply will
contract. This process may be repeated until the price lowers to the level where the quantity
supplied is in equilibrium with the quantity demanded.
These situations implies that whenever the market is not in equilibrium, either because the
market price is too high (excess supply) or too low (excess demand), the forces of supply and
demand will cause prices to adjust and the market price will move towards the equilibrium price.
For the illustration of graphs regarding shifts in supply and demand curves, let us assume that
we have a hamburger business. Based on the 5 scenarios, let's assess how the curve will
change with the increase or decrease in demand and supply and how it will affect the price and
quantity.
As a result:
As a result:
So, in response to consumers becoming more health-conscious, the price and quantity of the
product decrease in this market.
In short, demand and supply shift to the right when it increases and move to the left when it
decreases. Also, demand has a direct relationship to price and quantity, while supply is inversely
affecting price and has a direct relationship to quantity.
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
Now, what happens when supply and demand both change? Well, double shifting happens,
wherein when two curves shift at the same time, either the price or the quantity will be
indeterminate.
Huge
Demand Increase, Small Supply Decrease:
2. A perfectly competitive market brings itself into equilibrium without any outside
intervention.
If a market is perfectly competitive, it will eventually move toward market equilibrium without any
involvement of the government or other external pressures. Assume that the market price
exceeds the equilibrium. In such instance, surplus supply will exert downward pressure on
prices, causing supply to decline and demand to rise until they reach equilibrium. If the market
price is below equilibrium, surplus demand will exert upward pressure on the price, causing
supply to increase and demand to decrease until they reach equilibrium.
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
3. Equilibrium in the perfect competition model is Pareto efficient.
The equilibrium in perfect competition is a desirable conclusion since it results in a Pareto
efficient allocation of the product being sold. Pareto efficiency implies that no one can be made
better off without making someone else worse off.
Pareto efficiency is a key implication of perfect competition. It suggests that any market
manipulation, such as setting price limits, floors, quotas, or taxes, may only benefit certain
groups of market players while harming others.
4. All businesses are price takers and will generate no profits in the long run.
A completely competitive company is a price taker, which means it must accept the equilibrium
price as given. Due to the amount of competition, sellers in perfect competition do not have the
ability to set prices. If a seller attempts to raise their price over the market-clearing price,
competitors will undercut them, causing purchasers to search elsewhere. The vendor has no
motivation to charge less than the market price because they may earn more by charging it. As
an extension of this principle, perfect competition implies that no vendor in the market will make
a profit over time. Sellers can only break even.
PRODUCER SURPLUS
The producer surplus is the gap between the price a seller obtains and their willingness to sell
for each quantity. Each price on a supply curve indicates a seller's marginal cost of producing
one unit of goods. As a result, the difference between the seller's price for each unit and the
cost of producing the final unit is the seller's gain from the price they get.
This refers to the benefit enjoyed by producers who sell at a greater price than they would have
been willing to sell for. Graphically, the area above the supply curve and below the market price.
CONSUMER SURPLUS
The price customers are willing to pay for a specific quantity of product indicates the consumers'
marginal benefit at that quantity. The marginal benefit is the amount of extra satisfaction that
customers gain from a product for the final unit they consume.
This refers to the advantage gained by paying a lower price than one's willingness to pay.
Graphically, the area below the demand curve and above the market price.
ALLOCATIVE EFFICIENCY
This refers to market production occurring at a quantity and price where MB=MC. There is
neither overproduction nor underproduction, and resources are allocated efficiently.
ALLOCATIVE INEFFICIENCY
MB is not equal to MC with the current price and quantity combination. There is either too much
or too little of the goods being produced.
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
DEADWEIGHT LOSS
A deadweight loss is the cost to society that results from market inefficiency, which arises when
supply and demand are out of balance. Deadweight loss, which is commonly used in
economics, refers to any shortfall produced by weak resource allocation.
This is the loss in total welfare caused by a market producing at an allocatively inefficient price
and quantity combination.
EXAMPLES
Problem:
In a perfectly competitive market for apples, the market supply and market demand curves are
given by the following equations:
Where:
P is the price per apple
Q is the quantity of apples in pounds
Determine the equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity in this market, and calculate the
consumer surplus and producer surplus.
Solution:
1. Find the equilibrium quantity and price:
At equilibrium, the quantity supplied equals the quantity demanded, so we set the demand curve
equal to the supply curve:
20−0.5Q = 5+0.5Q
𝐶𝑆 = ½ × 15 × (20−12.5)
= ½ × 15 × 7.5
= 56.25
So, consumer surplus = 56.25.
Producer surplus is the area between the price line and the supply curve, up to the equilibrium
quantity.
*Height: The difference between the equilibrium price P=12.5 and the price producers
are willing to accept at Q=0 (which is the y-intercept of the supply curve, P=5).
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
So, the producer surplus is:
PS= ½ × 15 × (12.5−5)
= ½ × 15 × 7.5
= 56.25
● The demand curve (blue line) shows how consumers' willingness to pay decreases as
the quantity increases.
● The supply curve (red line) shows the price producers are willing to accept for each
additional unit produced.
● The equilibrium point is where the two curves intersect, at Q = 15 and P = 12.5.
● The consumer surplus (shaded blue area) is the area between the demand curve and
the equilibrium price, up to the equilibrium quantity.
● The producer surplus (shaded red area) is the area between the supply curve and the
equilibrium price, up to the equilibrium quantity.
DEADWEIGHT LOSS
Problem: Consider a perfectly competitive market for a good where the demand and
supply are given by the following equations:
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
Demand Curve:
𝑄𝐷=100−2𝑃
Supply Curve: 𝑄𝑆=2𝑃−20
Where:
Now, the government imposes a tax of $10 per unit on producers. We need to calculate the new
equilibrium price and quantity after the tax and determine the deadweight loss.
100−2𝑃=2𝑃−20
Solve for P:
100+20 = 4𝑃
⇒ 120 = 4𝑃
⇒ 𝑃=30
Now, substitute P=30 into either the demand or supply equation to find the equilibrium quantity
Q:
𝑄𝐷 =100−2(30)
=40
So, the equilibrium price is $30, and the equilibrium quantity is 40.
𝑄𝑆=2(𝑃−10)−20=2𝑃−40
100−2𝑃 = 2P−40
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
Solve for P:
100+40=4P
⇒140=4P
⇒P=35
This is the price the consumers pay, but the producers receive 35−10=25
Now, substitute P=35P = 35P=35 into the demand equation to find the new quantity:
QD=100−2(35)
=30
So, the new equilibrium price paid by consumers is $35, the price received by producers is $25,
and the new quantity traded is 30.
One example of monopolistic competition is the smartphone brands in the market. Samsung,
Oppo, and Vivo are the top smartphone brands in the market today. They all offer android
smartphones but with different variations. Samsung provides timely software updates, ensuring
that its devices remain secure and up-to-date with the latest features. Meanwhile, Oppo has
consistently pushed the boundaries of smartphone photography, introducing innovative features
like AI-powered image processing and advanced camera systems. On the otherhand, Vivo
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
offers devices with powerful processors and smooth performance, ensuring a seamless user
experience. These variations on the product only make sense if consumers are responsive to
these differences and are willing to pay a slightly higher price for the variation they prefer.
Unfortunately, even under monopolistic competition, firms can expect to do no better than a zero
economic profit in the long run. The rationale for this is as follows: Suppose a firm has
discovered a niche variation that is able to sustain a premium price and earn a positive
economic profit. Another firm selling in the market or a new entrant in the market will be
attracted to mimic the successful firm. Due to free entry and perfect information, the successful
firm will not be able to stop the copycats. Once the copycats are selling a copy of this product
variation, a process of price undercutting will commence as was described for perfect
information, and prices will continue to drop until the price equals average cost and firms are
earning only a zero economic profit.
It may be argued that the selling firms, by virtue of their size and being of limited number, could
all agree to keep prices above their average cost so they can sustain positive economic profits.
However, here is where the assumption of free entry spoils the party. Because if the company
charges too much or offers poor service, new companies can quickly swoop in, grab customers,
and undercut prices. This threat of competition keeps the original company in check, making it
act more like a competitive market, even if it's technically a monopoly. A new entrant could see
the positive economic profits of the existing sellers, enter the market at a slightly lower price,
and still earn an economic profit. Once it is clear that firms are unable to sustain a pact to
maintain above cost prices, price competition will drive the price to where firms will get zero
economic profits.
In Competitive Strategy, Michael Porter of Harvard University outlines a road map for
firms to prevail in these competitive markets. He outlined two main strategies:
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
In monopolistic competition, firms are able to charge more for unique products
because consumers are willing to pay more for distinctive products. However, the original firm's
advantage is diminished when competitors start to provide comparable items after noticing
successful innovations. In order to maintain above-average revenues, Porter's product
differentiation strategy entails continuously creating new product variations that consumers
value. Consistent investment in market research and innovation is essential for success here.
College of Accountancy, Business, Economics and International Hospitality Management
Porter also proposed the focus strategy where each of his two approaches may be
tailored to a certain market niche or aimed at market participation in general. This strategy
capitalizes on market segmentation. By focusing on the specific needs of this market, the firm
can either provide more affordable prices or unique products that appeal to this demographic,
which will postpone competition and increase profitability. Businesses must choose if a focused
or broader approach is more appropriate for their market and available resources because
concentrating on a single segment can limit potential revenues in other areas.
Additionally, the focus strategy has two variants:
a. Cost Focus - where firm seeks a cost advantage in its target segment; and
b. Differentiation Focus - where a firm seeks differentiation in its target segment.
References:
Action, I. (2016). Successful Examples Of Product Differentiation In Action - FasterCapital.
FasterCapital.
https://fastercapital.com/topics/successful-examples-of-product-differentiation-in-action.ht
ml
Economics Mafia. (2015, January 28). Shifting of Demand and Supply Curves (Part II) [Video].
YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmHmDpXXNVM
EPAM SolutionsHub. (2023, June 9). Cost Leadership Strategy: How to Gain a Competitive
Edge in the Marketplace. Epam.com.
https://solutionshub.epam.com/blog/post/cost-leadership-strategy
Hayes, Adam. (2024, September 26). Perfect Competition: Examples and How It Works.
Investopedia.com.
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/perfectcompetition.asp
Jacob Clifford. (2014, September 21). Shifting Demand and Supply- Macro Topic 1.6 (Micro
Topic 2.7) [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V0tIOqU7m-c
Porter’s Generic Competitive Strategies (ways of competing). (2016). Cam.ac.uk.
https://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/research/dstools/porters-generic-competitive-strategies/
Lynham, J., & OpenStax. (2018). 8.1 Perfect competition and why it matters. Pressbooks.
https://pressbooks.oer.hawaii.edu/principlesofmicroeconomics/chapter/8-1-perfect-competi
tion-and-why-it-matters/
Salish, M., & McClung, S. (2020, February 19). Market Equilibrium | INOMICS. INOMICS.
https://inomics.com/terms/market-equilibrium-1431109