Rosenberg's Molecular and Genetic Basis of Neurological and Psychiatric Disease Roger N. Rosenberg All Chapters Instant Download
Rosenberg's Molecular and Genetic Basis of Neurological and Psychiatric Disease Roger N. Rosenberg All Chapters Instant Download
Rosenberg's Molecular and Genetic Basis of Neurological and Psychiatric Disease Roger N. Rosenberg All Chapters Instant Download
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/rosenbergs-
molecular-and-genetic-basis-of-neurological-and-
psychiatric-disease-roger-n-rosenberg/
https://textbookfull.com/product/rosenbergs-molecular-and-genetic-
basis-of-neurological-and-psychiatric-disease-6th-edition-roger-n-
rosenberg/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/israels-technology-economy-david-
rosenberg/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/cellular-and-molecular-basis-of-
mitochondrial-inheritance-mitochondrial-disease-and-fitness-peter-
sutovsky/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-omega-prize-the-legion-
omegas-1-1st-edition-ryans-leann-ryans-leann/
textbookfull.com
Effective C An introduction to professional C programming
1st Edition Robert C. Seacord
https://textbookfull.com/product/effective-c-an-introduction-to-
professional-c-programming-1st-edition-robert-c-seacord/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/public-relations-writing-and-media-
techniques-books-a-la-carte-8th-edition-dennis-l-wilcox/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/exploration-and-production-of-
oceanic-natural-gas-hydrate-critical-factors-for-commercialization-
michael-d-max/
textbookfull.com
How the Fed Moves Markets: Central Bank Analysis for the
Modern Era 1st Edition Evan A. Schnidman
https://textbookfull.com/product/how-the-fed-moves-markets-central-
bank-analysis-for-the-modern-era-1st-edition-evan-a-schnidman/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-lunch-box-cookbook-over-50-fun-
and-delicious-lunch-recipes-to-fill-your-lunch-box-booksumo-press/
textbookfull.com
The Origins Of Globalization World Trade In The Making Of
The Global Economy 1500 1800 Pim De Zwart
https://textbookfull.com/product/the-origins-of-globalization-world-
trade-in-the-making-of-the-global-economy-1500-1800-pim-de-zwart/
textbookfull.com
ROSENBERG’S MOLECULAR AND GENETIC BASIS OF
NEUROLOGICAL AND PSYCHIATRIC DISEASE
ROSENBERG’S
MOLECULAR AND
GENETIC BASIS OF
NEUROLOGICAL AND
PSYCHIATRIC DISEASE
VOLUME 1
SIXTH EDITION
Edited by
ROGER N. ROSENBERG
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, UT Southwestern University Hospitals and Clinics,
Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX, United States
JUAN M. PASCUAL
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, UT Southwestern University Hospitals and Clinics,
Parkland Memorial Hospital, Children’s Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Academic Press is an imprint of Elsevier
125 London Wall, London EC2Y 5AS, United Kingdom
525 B Street, Suite 1650, San Diego, CA 92101, United States
50 Hampshire Street, 5th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02139, United States
The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, United Kingdom
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical,
including photocopying, recording, or any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the
publisher. Details on how to seek permission, further information about the Publisher’s permissions policies and our
arrangements with organizations such as the Copyright Clearance Center and the Copyright Licensing Agency, can be
found at our website: www.elsevier.com/permissions.
This book and the individual contributions contained in it are protected under copyright by the Publisher (other than as
may be noted herein).
Notices
Knowledge and best practice in this field are constantly changing. As new research and experience broaden our
understanding, changes in research methods, professional practices, or medical treatment may become necessary.
Practitioners and researchers must always rely on their own experience and knowledge in evaluating and using any
information, methods, compounds, or experiments described herein. In using such information or methods they should be
mindful of their own safety and the safety of others, including parties for whom they have a professional responsibility.
To the fullest extent of the law, neither the Publisher nor the authors, contributors, or editors, assume any liability for any
injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or
operation of any methods, products, instructions, or ideas contained in the material herein.
We dedicate this text to our colleagues, who, by perseverance and dedication, have provided essential new scientific knowl-
edge about the molecular and genetic basis of neurologic and psychiatric disorders, and, in so doing, have conceptualized
important insights into disease causation and therapies for the future.
Roger N. Rosenberg and Juan M. Pascual
I wish to dedicate this work to my parents, Cora and Sol Rosenberg, and to my wife, Adrienne. They have been an inspira-
tion to me and have provided me with their care and love to maintain my focus and resilience throughout my life and career,
for which I will forever be grateful.
Roger N. Rosenberg
Juan M. Pascual dedicates this work to his mother, Guadalupe Fernández Ariza, a distinguished scholar, from whom he con-
tinues to learn everything worth knowing:
If you follow my advice, first of all I shall show you many works of men of old, tell you their wondrous deeds and words, and
make you conversant with almost all knowledge, and I shall ornament your soul, which concerns you most, with many noble adorn-
ments —temperance, justice, piety, kindliness, reasonableness, understanding, steadfastness, love of all that is beautiful, ardour towards
all that is sublime; for these are the truly flawless jewels of the soul. Nothing that came to pass of old will escape you, and nothing that
must now come to pass; nay, you will even foresee the future with me. In a word, I shall speedily teach you everything that there is,
whether it pertains to the gods or to man. . . They say that some men become immortal. I shall bring this to pass with you; for though
you yourself depart from life, you will never cease associating with men of education and conversing with men of eminence.
Lucian. The Dream or Lucian’s Career. Translated by A. M. Harmon. Loeb Classical Library 130. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press, 1921.
Contents
Introduction 3 Introduction 59
Mendelian traits 3 Genotype and phenotype: definition and clinical usage 60
Repeat expansion disorders 7 Penetrance 63
Non-Mendelian inheritance 8 Expressivity 64
Chromosomal and genomic disorders 10 Clinical heterogeneity 64
Multigenic inheritance 16 Complex disease and polygenic risk 65
Complex traits 17 Genotype phenotype considerations for the neurogenetic
Epigenetics 19 evaluation 66
The human genome: next-generation sequencing 21 Conclusion 66
Conclusion 21 Funding 67
References 22 Conflict of interest 67
References 67
vii
viii CONTENTS
II Introduction 311
Clinical description 312
Neurologic diseases Genetics and neurobiology 319
Testing 320
Targeted treatments 321
18. Cerebral malformations Behavioral interventions 324
RENZO GUERRINI AND ELENA PARRINI Summary and future perspectives 325
See also 326
Malformations of cortical development 249 Acknowledgments 326
Malformations due to abnormal neuronal migration 255 References 326
x CONTENTS
Introduction 401
24. Angelman syndrome Clinical features 401
JENNIFER M. MATHEWS, EMILY K. COOK, SETH S. MARGOLIS Diagnostic evaluation 404
AND CHARLES A. WILLIAMS Pathology 405
Biochemical findings 407
Summary 349 Molecular genetic findings 408
Clinical features 349 Animal models 410
Molecular genetics 351 Therapy 411
Disease mechanisms 354 Conclusion 411
Cellular and molecular as associated details 355 Acknowledgments 411
Differential diagnosis 356 References 412
Testing 356
Management 356
References 358 28. Mitochondrial disorders due to mutations
in the nuclear genome
PATRICK F. CHINNERY AND RITA HORVATH
25. Prion diseases
JAMES A. MASTRIANNI Clinical overview and history 415
Prevalence 415
Introduction 363
Clinical presentation 415
Origins of discovery 363
Molecular genetics and disease mechanisms 421
Epidemiology 364
Testing 421
Pathologic features of prion diseases 364
Management 422
Genetics of prion diseases 365
References 423
Cellular prion protein biology 366
Prion biology 367
Prion initiation and propagation 369 29. Pyruvate dehydrogenase, pyruvate carboxylase,
Synthesizing prions 370 Krebs cycle, and mitochondrial transport disorders
Prion pathogenesis 370
VIKRAM JAKKAMSETTI, ISAAC MARIN-VALENCIA, QIAN MA
Species barrier 371 AND JUAN M. PASCUAL
Prion strains 372
Prion-related proteins 372 Pyruvate dehydrogenase deficiency 427
Human prion disease phenotypes 373 Pyruvate carboxylase deficiency 430
Diagnostic tests 375 Disorders of the Krebs cycle 432
Therapy 376 Mitochondrial transporter disorders 433
References 377 Acknowledgments 434
References 434
III
Neurometabolic disorders LYSOSOMAL DISORDERS
30. Gaucher disease—neuronopathic forms
RAPHAEL SCHIFFMANN
MITOCHONDRIAL DISORDERS
26. The mitochondrial genome Clinical features 439
ERIC A. SCHON
Natural history and clinical syndromes 440
Typical specific features 441
Mitochondrial origins 389 Auditory dysfunction 441
Genome organization 389 Myoclonus 441
CONTENTS xi
Pathophysiology 442 Differential diagnosis 487
Differential diagnosis 445 Testing 488
References 447 Management 489
Acknowledgments 490
References 490
31. The Niemann Pick diseases
EDWARD H. SCHUCHMAN AND ROBERT J. DESNICK
35. The mucopolysaccharidoses
Introduction 451 DENA MATALON, KIMBERLEE MICHALS MATALON RD
Clinical features and diagnostic evaluation 451 AND REUBEN MATALON
Radiologic and neurophysiologic studies 452
Cellular pathology 452 Introduction 493
Biochemical findings 452 History 493
Brain immunochemical findings 453 Manifestations of the mucopolysaccharidoses 494
Mechanism of disease 453 Therapy for the mucopolysaccharidoses 506
Molecular genetics 453 References 507
Animal models 454 Further reading 511
Therapy 455
Conclusion 457
References 458
36. The mucolipidoses
DENA MATALON, KIMBERLEE MICHALS MATALON RD
AND REUBEN MATALON
32. GM2-gangliosidoses
Introduction 513
GREGORY M. PASTORES AND GUSTAVO H.B. MAEGAWA
Manifestations of the mucolipidoses 513
Brief historical note 461 Sialidosis types I and II 513
Clinical features 462 Biochemical and molecular studies 514
Diagnostic confirmation 464 Galactosialidosis 514
Molecular genetics 464 Biochemical and molecular studies 514
Disease mechanisms 465 Mucolipidosis II (I-cell disease) 514
Imaging 466 Biochemical and molecular studies 515
Differential diagnosis 467 Mucolipidosis III (pseudo-Hurler polydystrophy) 515
Management 467 Biochemical and molecular studies 516
References 469 Mucolipidosis IV 516
Biochemical and molecular studies 516
References 516
33. Metachromatic leukodystrophy and multiple
sulfatase deficiency 37. Disorders of glycoprotein degradation:
FLORIAN S. EICHLER
sialidosis, fucosidosis, α-mannosidosis,
Introduction 473 β-mannosidosis, and aspartylglycosaminuria
Clinical features 474 WILLIAM G. JOHNSON†
Natural history 474
Multiple sulfatase deficiency 475 Introduction 519
Molecular genetics 475 Biosynthesis and biodegradation of glycoproteins 520
Disease mechanisms 476 Sialidosis 521
Differential diagnosis 476 Fucosidosis 525
Testing 476 α-Mannosidosis 527
Management 477 β-Mannosidosis 530
Therapies under investigation 478 Aspartylglycosaminuria 531
References 478 References 533
34. Krabbe disease: globoid cell leukodystrophy 38. β-Galactosidase deficiency: GM1 gangliosidosis,
DAVID A. WENGER AND PAOLA LUZI Morquio B disease, and galactosialidosis
WILLIAM G. JOHNSON†
Clinical features 481
Molecular genetics 482 Introduction 535
Disease mechanisms 484 GM1 gangliosidosis and Morquio B disease 535
Pathophysiology 485 GM1 gangliosidosis 536
†
Deceased
Visit https://textbookfull.com
now to explore a rich
collection of eBooks, textbook
and enjoy exciting offers!
xii CONTENTS
42. Fabry disease: α-galactosidase A deficiency 46. Neurodegeneration with brain iron accumulation
ROBERT J. DESNICK SUSANNE A. SCHNEIDER
Nicholas Ah Mew Children’s National Medical Center, Philip L. De Jager Department of Neurology, Center for
Washington, DC, United States; The George Washington Translational & Computational Neuroimmunology, Taub
University of the Health Sciences, Washington, DC, Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the
United States Aging Brain, Columbia University Irving Medical Center,
Wado Akamatsu Center for Genomic and Regenerative New York, NY, United States
Medicine, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Didem Demirbas Harvard Medical School and Boston
Japan Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
Hasan Orhan Akman Columbia University Medical Robert J. Desnick Icahn School of Medicine at Mount
Center, New York, NY, United States Sinai, New York, NY, United States
Afnan AlHakeem McGill University Health Centre, Salvatore DiMauro Department of Neurology, Columbia
Montreal, QC, Canada; McGill University, Montreal, QC, University Medical Center, New York, NY, United States
Canada; Prince Sultan Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Florian S. Eichler Massachusetts General Hospital,
Koji Aoyama Department of Pharmacology, Teikyo Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Bernice Elger Institute of Biomedical Ethics, University of
Rafael Artuch Sant Joan de Déu Research Institute and Basel, Basel, Switzerland
CIBERER-ISCIII (Centre for Biomedical Research on Rare
Diseases), Barcelona, Spain Valentina Emmanuele Department of Neurology,
Michael Beck Institute of Human Genetics, University of Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY,
Mainz, Mainz, Germany United States
C. Frank Bennett Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, CA, Patricia Evans Department of Pediatrics, Neurology &
United States Neurotherapeutics, and Psychiatry, University of Texas
Gerard T. Berry Harvard Medical School and Boston Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Children’s Hospital, Boston, MA, United States Brent L. Fogel Program in Neurogenetics, Department of
D. Montgomery Bissell University of California San Neurology; Department of Human Genetics; Department
Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States of Neurology, Clinical Neurogenomics Research Center,
Brenda Canine McLaughlin Research Institute & Great David Geffen School of Medicine, University of
Falls College Montana State University, Great Falls, MT, California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
United States Àngels Garcı́a-Cazorla Sant Joan de Déu Research Institute
C. Thomas Caskey Department of Molecular and Human and CIBERER-ISCIII (Centre for Biomedical Research on
Genetics and Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor Rare Diseases), Barcelona, Spain
College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States Cinzia Gellera Unit of Medical Genetics and
Widler Casy Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Neurogenetics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico
Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States “Carlo Besta”, Milan, Italy
Patrick F. Chinnery Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Sailaja Golla Department of Pediatrics, Neurology &
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; Neurotherapeutics, and Psychiatry, University of Texas
MRC Mitochondrial Biology Unit, University of Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom Kimberly Goodspeed Department of Pediatrics,
David T. Chuang Department of Biochemistry, University Neurology & Neurotherapeutics, and Psychiatry,
of Texas Southwestern, Medical Center, Dallas, TX, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas,
United States; Department of Internal Medicine, TX, United States
University of Texas Southwestern, Medical Center, Dallas, Sidney M. Gospe Jr. Division of Pediatric Neurology,
TX, United States Departments of Neurology and Pediatrics, University of
Emily K. Cook Department of Biological Chemistry, The Washington and Seattle Children’s Hospital, Seattle, WA,
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, United States; Department of Pediatrics, Duke University,
MD, United States Durham, NC, United States
Rody P. Cox Department of Internal Medicine, University Steven J. Gray Department of Pediatrics, University of
of Texas Southwestern, Medical Center, Dallas, TX, Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United
United States States
xvii
xviii LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS
Andrea L. Gropman Children’s National Medical Center, Chisato Kinoshita Department of Pharmacology, Teikyo
Washington, DC, United States; The George Washington University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
University of the Health Sciences, Washington, DC,
Sanne E. Klompe Department of Biochemistry and
United States
Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York,
Yian Gu Departments of Neurology and Epidemiology, NY, United States
The Taub Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease
and the Aging Brain, The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Lisa M. Koehl Department of Neurology, University of
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
NY, United States Michael C. Kruer Molecular & Cellular Biology Program,
Renzo Guerrini Pediatric Neurology Unit and Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States;
Laboratories, Children’s Hospital A. Meyer, University of Departments of Child Health, Neurology, and Cellular &
Florence, Florence, Italy Molecular Medicine, Program in Genetics, University of
Teresa M. Gunn McLaughlin Research Institute, Great Arizona College of Medicine Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ,
Falls, MT, United States United States; Pediatric Movement Disorders Program,
Barrow Neurological Institute at Phoenix Children’s
Una Hadziahmetovic Departments of Child Health,
Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, United States
Neurology, and Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Program
in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine Walter A. Kukull Department of Epidemiology, University
Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, United States of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States
Darrah Haffner Department of Neurology, Washington Roger M. Lane Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Carlsbad, CA,
University in St Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States United States
R.J. Hagerman University of California at Davis, M.I.N.D.
Institute, Sacramento, CA, United States Joseph H. Lee The Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center,
Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York,
Tamar Harel Department of Genetic and Metabolic NY, United States
Diseases, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center,
Jerusalem, Israel M.J. Leigh University of California at Davis, M.I.N.D.
Institute, Sacramento, CA, United States
Elizabeth Head Department of Pathology & Laboratory
Medicine, University of California—Irvine, Irvine, CA, Qinglan Ling Department of Pediatrics, University of
United States Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United
States
Rita Horvath Department of Clinical Neurosciences,
University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom James R. Lupski Department of Molecular and Human
Genetics; Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of
Yasushi Hosoi First Department of Medicine, Hamamatsu Medicine, Houston, TX, United States; Texas Children’s
University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu, Japan Hospital, Houston, TX, United States
Ying-Chen Claire Hou Human Longevity, Inc., San Diego,
CA, United States Paola Luzi Department of Neurology, Jefferson Medical
College, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Jane Hsiao OPKO Health Inc., Miramar, FL, United States
Hiroyuki Ishiura Department of Neurology, Graduate Qian Ma Department of Neurology and
School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Neurotherapeutics, The University of Texas Southwestern
Japan Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Clifford R. Jack Jr. Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic, Gustavo H.B. Maegawa Department of Pediatrics/Genetics
Rochester, MN, United States & Metabolism, University of Florida Gainesville, Florida,
Vikram Jakkamsetti Department of Neurology and United States
Neurotherapeutics, The University of Texas Southwestern Mary J. Malloy University of California, San Francisco
Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States
William G. Johnson† †(Deceased) Department of Seth S. Margolis Department of Biological Chemistry;
Neurology, Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, The
School, New Brunswick, NJ, United States Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore,
Fabrice Jotterand Center for Bioethics and Medical MD, United States
Humanities, Institute for Health & Equality, Medical Isaac Marin-Valencia Laboratory of Developmental
College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States; Neurobiology, The Rockefeller University, New York, NY,
Institute of Biomedical Ethics, University of Basel, Basel, United States
Switzerland
James A. Mastrianni Department of Neurology, Center for
John P. Kane University of California, San Francisco School Comprehensive Care and Research on Memory Disorders,
of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, United States Helen McLoraine Neuroscientist of the Brain Research
Olga Khorkova OPKO Health Inc., Miramar, FL, United Foundation, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL,
States United States
LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS xix
Dena Matalon Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United William L. Nyhan Professor of Pediatrics, University of
States; The University of Houston, Houston, TX, United California, La Jolla, CA, United States; Department of
States; The University of Texas Medical Branch, Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego,
Galveston, TX, United States CA, United States
Reuben Matalon Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United Hideyuki Okano Department of Physiology, Keio
States; The University of Houston, Houston, TX, United University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
States; The University of Texas Medical Branch, Sergio Padilla-Lopez Departments of Child Health,
Galveston, TX, United States Neurology, and Cellular & Molecular Medicine, Program
in Genetics, University of Arizona College of Medicine
Kimberlee Michals Matalon Rd Stanford University,
Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ, United States
Stanford, CA, United States; The University of Houston,
Houston, TX, United States; The University of Texas Elena Parrini Pediatric Neurology Unit and Laboratories,
Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, United States Children’s Hospital A. Meyer, University of Florence,
Florence, Italy
Jennifer M. Mathews Division of Pediatric Genetics and
Metabolism, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Juan M. Pascual Department of Neurology
NC, United States and Neurotherapeutics; Department of Physiology;
Department of Pediatrics; Eugene McDermott Center for
Richard Mayeux Department of Neurology and the Taub
Human Growth & Development/Center for Human
Institute for Research on Alzheimer’s Disease and the
Genetics; Division of Pediatric Neurology; The University
Aging Brain, Columbia University Irving Medical Center,
of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX,
New York, NY, United States
United States
Jennifer McCurdy University of Alaska Anchorage,
Gregory M. Pastores National Centre for Inherited
Anchorage, AK, United States
Metabolic Disorders, Mater Misericordiae University
Meira R. Meltzer Children’s National Medical Center, Hospital, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
Washington, DC, United States; The George Washington
Shailendra B. Patel University of Cincinnati College of
University of the Health Sciences, Washington, DC,
Medicine, Cincinnati, OH, United States
United States
† Marc C. Patterson Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United
John H. Menkes† (Deceased)
States
Justin Miron Centre for Studies in the Prevention of
Izabella A. Pena Department of Biology, Whitehead
Alzheimer’s Disease, Douglas Mental Health University
Institute for Biomedical Research, Massachusetts Institute
Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada
of Technology, Cambridge, MA, United States
Jun Mitsui Department of Neurology, Graduate School of
Cynthia Picard Centre for Studies in the Prevention of
Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Alzheimer’s Disease, Douglas Mental Health University
Hiroaki Miyajima First Department of Medicine, Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada
Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, Hamamatsu,
Judes Poirier Centre for Studies in the Prevention of
Japan
Alzheimer’s Disease, Douglas Mental Health University
Lisa M. Monteggia Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada
University, Nashville, TN, United States
Jennifer E. Posey Department of Molecular and Human
Mary Ann Morris Children’s Health Dallas, Dallas, TX, Genetics and Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor
United States College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
Hugo W. Moser† †(Deceased) Kennedy Krieger Institute, Gerald V. Raymond Pediatric Neurology, Department of
Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States Pediatrics and Neurology, Penn State Children’s Hospital,
Melissa E. Murray Department of Neuroscience, Hershey, PA, United States
Jacksonville, FL, United States William Renthal Department of Neurology, Brigham and
Toshio Nakaki Department of Pharmacology, Teikyo Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,
University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan United States
Nathalie Nilsson Centre for Studies in the Prevention of David S. Rosenblatt Departments of Human Genetics,
Alzheimer’s Disease, Douglas Mental Health University Medicine, Pediatrics and Biology, McGill University,
Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada Montreal, QC, Canada
Francis Rossignol Children’s National Medical Center,
Ichizo Nishino Department of Neuromuscular Research,
Washington, DC, United States; National Institutes of
National Institute of Neuroscience, National Center of
Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
Neurology and Psychiatry (NCNP), Tokyo, Japan
Gerald Salen Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark,
Sandra M.H. Nordlie Molecular & Cellular Biology Program, NJ, United States
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, United States
Konrad Sandhoff LIMES Institute, Kekulé-Institute,
Robert L. Nussbaum Invitae Corporation, San Francisco, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
CA, United States
xx LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS
Raphael Schiffmann Baylor Scott & White Research Wendy R. Uhlmann Division of Genetic Medicine,
Institute, Dallas, TX, United States Department of Internal Medicine and Human Genetics,
Detlev Schindler University of Würzburg, Würzburg, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI,
Germany United States
Frederick A. Schmitt Departments of Neurology, Clara van Karnebeek Department of Pediatrics, Amalia
Neurosurgery, Psychiatry, Psychology, Behavioral Children’s Hospital, Radboud University Medical Centre,
Science, Sander’s Brown Center on Aging, Spinal Cord Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatrics,
and Brain Injury Research Center, University of Kentucky, Emma Children’s Hospital, Amsterdam University
Lexington, KY, United States Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Susanne A. Schneider Department of Neurology, Ludwig- Kathryn L. Van Pelt Sanders-Brown Center on Aging,
Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, United States
Eric A. Schon Departments of Neurology and of Genetics Prashanthi Vemuri Department of Radiology Mayo Clinic,
and Development, Columbia University, New York, NY, Rochester, MN, United States
United States Charles P. Venditti Organic Acid Research Section,
Edward H. Schuchman Icahn School of Medicine at Mount National Human Genome Research Institute, National
Sinai, New York, NY, United States Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, United States
Margretta Reed Seashore Genetics, Yale School of Claes Wahlestedt Center for Therapeutic Innovation and
Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences,
University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami,
Frances C. Shaffo Department of Pediatrics, University of
FL, United States
Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United
States Bruce Wang University of California San Francisco, San
Francisco, CA, United States
Michael Shevell McGill University Health Centre,
Montreal, QC, Canada; McGill University, Montreal, QC, David Watkins Department of Human Genetics, McGill
Canada University, Montreal, QC, Canada
Sarah E. Sinnett Department of Pediatrics, University of David A. Wenger Department of Neurology, Jefferson
Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United Medical College, Philadelphia, PA, United States
States Charles A. Williams Division of Genetics and Metabolism,
Myriam Srour McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Department of Pediatrics, University of Florida School of
QC, Canada; McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada Medicine, Gainesville, FL, United States
Samuel H. Sternberg Department of Biochemistry and Golder N. Wilson Pediatrics, Texas Tech University Health
Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, Science Center, Lubbock, TX, United States;
NY, United States KinderGenome Medical Genetics, Dallas, TX, United
States
Kazuma Sugie Department of Neurology, Nara Medical
University School of Medicine, Kashihara, Japan Barry Wolf Division of Genetics, Birth Defects and
Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, Ann and Robert H.
Kristen L. Szabla Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Vanderbilt
Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago and Northwestern
University, Nashville, TN, United States
University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL,
Franco Taroni Unit of Medical Genetics and Neurogenetics, United States
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico “Carlo Besta”,
R. Max Wynn Department of Biochemistry; Department of
Milan, Italy
Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern,
Marina Tedeschi Dauar Centre for Studies in the Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Prevention of Alzheimer’s Disease, Douglas Mental
Hung-Chun Yu Human Longevity, Inc., San Diego, CA,
Health University Institute, Verdun, QC, Canada
United States
Shoji Tsuji Department of Neurology, Graduate School of
Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Foreword
Thirty-seven years ago, I was a resident in the Department of Neurology at UT Southwestern, chaired by R.N.
Rosenberg, always a splendid teacher and now a coeditor of this book. I was intent on learning more about neu-
rology because I was eager to engage with the profound mysteries the brain presented. Disorders of higher corti-
cal function, bearing both on consciousness and on its content, were particularly fascinating to me at the time.
What a magnificent scientific frontier to explore!
It was of course a different world in those days. The causes of inherited metabolic diseases of the nervous sys-
tem had in some instances been determined through biochemical studies. But most genetic diseases of the ner-
vous system remained elusive. What caused Huntington’s disease? Spinocerebellar ataxia? Wilson’s disease?
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis? Limited progress and much guesswork seemed to prevail in 1982.
Within a few years, many of these mysteries had been swept away. Positional cloning, sometimes carried out
in humans and sometimes in mice, had unambiguously solved many of the Mendelian disorders. Although I had
taken a different direction in science by that time (using genetics to study immunity), I never lost my early inter-
est in the brain. It was a pleasure to witness the discovery of mutations responsible for classical diseases.
Sometimes, it seemed, the causes of two or three such diseases would be published within the space of a week. It
was the beginning of a golden age, yet revolution has yet to run its course. In time, we all came to realize that
some disease phenotypes result from multiple genetic causes. Not all of the relevant genes have yet been discov-
ered. Some diseases are complex rather than Mendelian; some are epigenetic rather than genetic. Nonetheless,
progress has exceeded what anyone might have forecast in the early 1980s.
Solving Mendelian disorders was once a difficult task. Many years were devoted to confining a causative mutation
to a critical region; then to finding the gene content of the region; finally to finding the causative mutation itself. The
sequence of the human and mouse genomes led to the present situation in which there are no longer “new” genes for
which one must search. Advances in engineering and chemistry led to massively parallel sequencing platforms that
simplified mutation finding. Today, at least in the mouse, we have reached a point where induced germline mutations
are found in real time (as quickly as a phenotype is detected, its cause is known). Although it has not been our primary
pursuit, my colleagues and I have made quite a number of interesting neurobehavioral phenotypes in mice using a
germline mutagen. We have, in some instances, shed light on orthologous human diseases. Complex diseases remain
difficult to solve, but one may at least see ways to deal with the problem.
Anyone who has absorbed the chapters of this book will understand that it is not enough to create or discover
an interesting phenotype and know its genetic cause. A long road lies beyond that achievement. One must grasp
the mechanism by which the mutation causes the phenotype, and often this requires a great effort. A “combined
arms” doctrine may be used, in the hope that the best tools of structural biology, biochemistry, and cell biology
will yield mechanism.
The word “mechanism” is itself a bit vague. Do we mean understanding in terms of cellular or subcellular
processes? The atomic level? Far less than that? Mechanistic understanding puts us in mind of machines: devices
we create and therefore understand as well as we might understand anything. Most of us accept that we are bio-
logical machines. But biological machines are unique in their ability to be self-aware, and to experience joy, rage,
fear, desire, and grief. Machines of our own construction, though capable of emulating thought by virtue of exe-
cuting binary programs, actually possess no ability to think nor any of the other attributes just named. We have
come to know many of the molecules of the nervous system needed for its normal function. We have come to
understand how some of these molecules operate. Yet, where mechanism is concerned, a wide gulf still separates
us from understanding just how mentation comes about. Accordingly, my fascination with disorders of higher
cortical function has not faded. Neuroscience remains every bit the alluring frontier it was 37 years ago, or 100
years ago, or 4000 years ago, notwithstanding that the heart was held responsible for thought at that time.
Bruce Beutler
Nobel Laureate, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,
Dallas, TX, United States
xxi
Prologue
This is a momentous time in basic and translational neuroscience. The field is buzzing with new results, and
more findings especially on the role of circuits in behaviors are announced on a daily basis. As described next,
four methodological developments in particular have transformed neuroscience over the last decade, producing
several major conclusions that are broadly illustrated in many of the excellent chapters of this book.
First, approaches using large datasets that are based on unbiased surveys of a sample—a cell, a brain region,
or a person—with new large-scale techniques, such as exome sequencing, transcriptome analyses by RNAseq, or
proteomics. These approaches have yielded a plethora of data, the interpretation of which is often facilitated by
sophisticated statistical approaches. Among others, these large datasets have demonstrated that individual neu-
rons can be classified into groups and types but nevertheless display large variations in gene expression, suggest-
ing that even neurons of the same type can exhibit a range of functional properties. As another example, these
datasets have revealed an enormous degree of plasticity in gene expression and protein states, demonstrating
that even at the level of individual cells (such as a neuron), no state is constant.
Second, the systematic analysis of patient populations by genetic methods such as microarray analyses, exome
sequencing, and whole-genome sequencing has revolutionized our view of the human genome and of its role in
neuropsychiatric disorders. Specifically, we now know that the human genome is extraordinarily fluid and
undergoes dramatic changes from one generation to the next, changes that are often associated with diseases.
Moreover, these analyses have identified many new disease associations of genes that were previously not linked
to any neuropsychiatric disorder. Thus the term “genetic disease” has changed: a disorder such as schizophrenia
can be both genetically conditioned and also be noninherited because the predisposing mutation happened de
novo in the germ line, that is, was inherited from a parent who did not actually carry the same mutation in her
or his brain. Moreover, we now realize that especially neuropsychiatric disorders are not strongly influenced by
a few genes but can probably be promoted by mutations in hundreds of genes. These diseases are neither poly-
genic nor Mendelian in nature; instead, partial dysfunctions of neurons and circuits induced by a large number
of different genetic changes can predispose to these diseases. Furthermore, many genes are associated with multi-
ple disorders; for example, NRXN1 deletions are among the more frequent single-gene mutations associated with
a range of neurodevelopmental diseases, including schizophrenia, autism, and Tourette syndrome. These insights
have profound implications about how we think about the human brain and its disorders, as illustrated in the
chapters of this book.
Third, innovative techniques for controlling neuronal activity by light or drugs and new methods for mapping
connections between neurons have produced an avalanche of information on “circuits,” resulting in what could
almost be described as an industry of circuit neuroscientists who probe the role of particular classes of neurons
and their connections in specific behaviors. These new approaches of circuit neuroscience, richly supported by
NIH via the brain project, have motivated thousands of neuroscientists to participate in the effort of mapping
brain circuits and testing the involvement of specific types of neurons in behaviors. The term “circuit” continues
to be ambiguous since it is generally meant to describe a chain of neurons connected by synapses, not a particu-
lar computational arrangement of synapses linking neurons into a functional unit. Nevertheless, “circuit neuro-
science” has come to dominate neuroscience over the last decade. The data emerging from these studies, again as
described in several chapters of this book, are informative about the design of the brain and have the potential to
reshape our view of how the brain works.
Fourth, at the opposite extreme of the methodological scale from circuit neuroscience, cryo-electron micros-
copy has dramatically changed the study of large molecular entities that govern cellular functions, such as the
excitation of neurons. Whereas, traditionally, an atomic description of, for example, an ion channel or a ribosome
required painstaking attempts at producing protein crystals and solving their structures, cryo-electron micros-
copy has enabled a description of the atomic structure of large molecules without the need for crystals. This
advance allows not only faster analysis of large protein complexes but also more rapid studies of molecular
xxiii
Visit https://textbookfull.com
now to explore a rich
collection of eBooks, textbook
and enjoy exciting offers!
xxiv Prologue
assemblies that previously escaped crystallization. The short-term impact of cryo-electron microscopy on neuro-
science has not been as obvious as that of the other methodological advances described previously, but its long-
term importance cannot be overestimated. In the end a neuron’s role in a circuit or brain will not be understood
without deconvolution of the signaling events in that neuron itself. After all, action potential spikes are unlikely
by themselves to describe the function of a neuron in a circuit or brain, and the signaling events in a neuron
depend on its macromolecular complexes. Understanding such signaling events requires the atomic resolution of
the roles of a neuron’s macromolecular signaling machines, not only of its ion channels and neurotransmitter
receptors, but also, and arguably more importantly, of its intracellular molecular assemblies that amplify and
channel signals. Cryo-electron microscopy will be a key contributor to our understanding of how the cells of the
brain, both the neurons and glia, function as signaling units.
The current book presents, in a Herculean effort, an attempt to communicate our current understanding of the
molecular and genetic basis of brain disorders. In 113 chapters written by experts in the field, the book provides
an overview of this very important area of neuroscience. It is a much needed effort because neuroscience has
become balkanized, divided into fiefdoms that are often separated by cognitive walls. By compiling chapters
illustrating different approaches and subjects, the current book enables neuroscientists to achieve a more integra-
tive view of translational neurobiology and facilitates further studies on that most magical of all organs that is
the brain. Moreover, the book not only focuses on the most exciting recent developments in neuroscience that
have dramatically advanced our understanding of the brain as described earlier, but also it includes vast areas of
more traditional neuroscience that are in danger of being forgotten, such as electrophysiology and cell biology.
These areas obviously continue to be essential for our future understanding of the brain both in order to integrate
various approaches and to form the basis for an understanding of disease processes. Here, too, the book makes a
valuable contribution of general relevance to scientists in the field, setting the stage for the next major develop-
ment in translational neurobiology: a comprehensive understanding that goes beyond circuits and atomic
structures!
Thomas C. Südhof
Nobel Laureate, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
Introduction
We are publishing the sixth edition of “Rosenberg’s Molecular and Genetic Basis of Neurologic and Psychiatric
Disease.” The first edition appeared in 1993 followed by editions in 1997, 2003, 2008, and 2015. We are most grate-
ful for the foresight, dedication, and authorship of our former editors for the success of the first five editions. They
are Stanley B. Prusiner, Salvatore DiMauro, Robert L. Barchi, Louis M. Kunkel, Henry L. Paulson, Louis Ptacek,
and Eric J. Nestler. The sixth edition is edited by Roger N. Rosenberg and Juan M. Pascual.
This edition has been expanded and now includes chapters on Precision Medicine, Genomics, Epigenomics,
Immunogenetics, CRISPR Therapy, Antisense Oligonucleotide Drugs, Rett Syndrome, DNA Sequencing and
other methods of exonic and genomic analysis; Pharmacogenomics, Causation, association and other statistical
tools, Stem Cells and Therapeutic Development, Neuroimaging, Genetic Counseling, Neurodegeneration with
Brain Iron Accumulation, Pantothenate Kinase Deficiency, Disorders of Manganese Transport,
Aceruloplasminemia, Congenital Disorders of Nlinked Glycosylation. Neurotransmitter Disorders,
Frontotemporal Dementias, Dystonia, Glioblastoma, Tuberous Sclerosis, Von Hippel Lindau Disease,
Incontinentia Pigmenti, Vanishing White Matter Disease, Pain Disorders, Stroke, Sickle Cell Disease, and Autism.
Clearly, neurogenetics and neurogenomics have advanced rapidly and are now poised to develop in the next
decade effective targeted neurotherapeutics.
In the 27 years spanning the six editions of our book, molecular genomic analyses of the human genome have
been implemented seeking the genetic basis for natural selection providing biological fitness and also risk of
developing disease. Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) seeking gene variations, single nucleotide poly-
morphisms (SNPs), causal of several human diseases have been conducted in recent years, including autism,
schizophrenia, obesity, diabetes, and heart disease.
Whole-genome sequence (WGS) studies, whole-exome sequence (WES) studies, and GWAS for association or
causation with neurological diseases have been reported extensively in the past decade. An increased risk or cau-
sation for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Alzheimer’s disease (AD), Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis, epi-
lepsy, restless leg syndrome, and several movement disorders has been associated with polymorphisms or
mutations in specific genes. These observations have advanced an understanding of the causation of inherited,
complex polygenetic, multifactorial neurological diseases. They have been made possible by the publication of
the human genome and haplotype studies (HapMap analyses).
The hope with neurome-wide association studies has been that the complete complement of variant genes will be
identified causal of the major neurodegenerative diseases. Then, pharmaconeuromic therapy would not be far behind.
WES and WGS have provided new and important data of the major genes responsible for major human traits and
common diseases. WES and WGS have provided insights into gene variations in low-penetrant genes causal for poly-
genetic, multifactorial neurological disease, as AD. Overall, about 400 genetic variants have been identified that con-
tribute to human traits and diseases, including neurological diseases, and increasing numbers of specific mutations
causal of neurological diseases have been documented in recent years. The momentum is increasing and is highly pos-
itive leading to potential therapies with gene editing using the CRISPR CAS9 editing system.
Sequencing candidate genes for disease, including their surrounding regions in thousands of people, will be
needed to discover more associations with disease. SNPs are turning out not to be a stringent enough level of anal-
ysis seeking genetic risks for disease. Analyses of common, low-penetrance variants causal of common diseases
along with rare low- or moderately penetrance variants are being extensively analyzed with WES and WGS. It is
now necessary to move beyond sequencing candidate genes and surrounding regions for disease association and
provide whole genome or WESs to find the missing heritability. Francis Collins, Director of the National Institutes
of Health, has suggested that the 1000 genomes project, designed to sequence the genomes of at least 1000 people
from all over the world, would provide a powerful approach to finding the hidden heritability.
The BRAIN Initiative to determine the connectome of the human brain proposed by President Obama is now
well underway and is expected to grow into a major scientific endeavor comparable to the Human Genome
Project. It is intended to develop new technologies to identify, define, and decode the neuronal circuitry required
for the storage and retrieval of digital information for specific brain activities, including cognition, and then pro-
vides the basis for altered information transfer in neurologic and psychiatric diseases.
xxv
xxvi Introduction
The genetic explanations that would be of primary interest to find the missing heritability for genetic neuro-
logical disease missed by GWAS include copy-number variation (CNV), epistatic effects, and epigenetics. CNV
refers to regions of DNA that are up to hundreds of base pairs long that are deleted or duplicated between indi-
viduals. There are strong CNV associations between schizophrenics compared to normals and they may arise de
novo in persons without a family history of the mutation. Epistasis, where one or more modifying genes reduce
or enhance the effect of another gene, may be an important genetic mechanism at work to explain heritability.
Epigenetics is another vital area to be explored. It refers to changes in gene expression that are inherited but not
caused by alteration in the sequence of the gene. We now know that gene expression is altered by methylation or
acetylation of CpG and adenine regions of DNA and by methylation of specific histone proteins and also by inhi-
bition of messenger RNA expression by iRNA or microRNA binding.
The 21,000 protein-coding genes in the human genome make up less than 1.2% of the human genome.
Analysis of the remaining 98.8% of the human genome and its role in the causation of human neurological dis-
eases, both inherited and acquired, is a formidable challenge yet unexplored to any degree. RNA transcripts and
their effects on regulation and levels of gene expression is one of the next frontiers for neuromics.
Then, there is the issue that natural selection only functions before or during the reproductive years and not
afterward, when AD and Parkinson’s disease occur. Natural selection has as its major biological function to select
for fitness allowing for reproduction and maintenance of a lineage or species. Aging and neurodegenerative dis-
eases seem to have escaped the forces of natural selection by occurring after the reproductive years. On the other
hand, perhaps evolution has actually selected for aging and neurodegenerative diseases as a means to maintain
the limits of a finite lifespan.
Clearly, neuromics must address the molecular basis of brain aging and why the aging process provides a per-
missive environment to allow the opportunistic neuromic program causal of late-onset neurodegenerative dis-
eases to be expressed.
The cause of AD is due both to genetic polymorphisms and specific mutations (PS1, Ps2, and APP genes) and
environmental stimuli. In this view, environmental stimuli, to be determined, influence the production of an
abnormal pattern of gene expression causal of AD. So, we will have to understand the process of natural selec-
tion in the context of the selection pressures from the environments that we inhabit. Darwin emphasized adapta-
tion to a changing environment as the principal selective influence for evolution. This principle is valid studying
the interaction of environmental stimuli and the genetic factors causal of neurodegenerative diseases.
Deriving induced pluripotent stem cells from late-onset AD patients and differentiating them into neuroblasts
would be one way to screen compounds to see if an abnormal pattern of gene expression is produced compared
to derived neuroblasts from normal controls. Here would be a method to link environment to the genetic pro-
gram causal of AD. It would also be a means to screen potential therapeutic agents that correct an abnormal pat-
tern of gene expression seen in AD patients as a prelude to a clinical trial.
The 200 years since Darwin’s birth, 150 years since the publication of Origin of Species, and the 27 years of the
publication of the six editions of this book is a brief time in human experience. The sixth edition builds on the
development of neurogenetics, genomics/neuromics, and epigenomics during the past 30 years and documents
the advances in genome sequencing, CNV, epistasis, epigenetics, RNA regulation of gene expression, and stem
cell applications to decipher how mutations in these genetic functions are causal of neurological diseases.
Recent significant progress includes effective therapy for patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) using
adeno-associated virus as the vector for the survival motor neuron (SMN)1 gene and also utilizing antisense-
oligonucleotides for SMN2 gene that modulates premessenger RNA splicing of the SMN2 gene achieving suffi-
cient SMN2 gene expression for SMA patients to acquire independent walking at 3 years of age. Of great practi-
cal clinical importance, in addition, it is now possible to determine the gene mutation in over 30% of patients
with inherited neuromuscular disease utilizing WES.
We look forward to future editions of this book documenting the clinical and molecular bases of inherited neu-
rological and psychiatric diseases and associated therapeutics and wish to express our gratitude to our many
loyal colleagues who have participated in all the six editions and thank our new authors for their contributions
to maintain the book’s scientific rigor and excellence. We note with sadness and gratitude the death of our
esteemed colleague, William G. Johnson, who was an author in all six editions of our book. His chapters on
“Beta-Galactosidase Deficiency: GM1 Gangliosidosis, Morquio B Disease, and Galactosialidosis” and “Disorders
of Glycoprotein Degradation: Sialidosis, Fucosidosis, alpha-Mannosidosis, beta-Mannosidosis and
Aspartylglycosaminuria” express fully his immense scholarship and scientific contributions. He was a great
molecular geneticist and we mourn his loss. Our special gratitude is extended to our Project Managers Kristi
Anderson, Melanie Tucker and Sujatha Thirugnana Sambandam for their foresight, insights, efforts, and support
to publish this edition efficiently, effectively, and on time. We are indebted to you.
Roger N. Rosenberg and Juan M. Pascual
Editors
C H A P T E R
1
Mendelian, non-Mendelian, multigenic
inheritance, and epigenetics
Tamar Harel1 and James R. Lupski2,3,4
1
Department of Genetic and Metabolic Diseases, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
2
Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States
3
Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States 4Texas Children’s Hospital,
Houston, TX, United States
Introduction
More than 80% of genes are expressed in brain.1 This explains why variation in countless genes and biological
pathways affect neurological phenotypes. The impact of genetics on neurological disease ranges from strict
Mendelian inheritance, wherein a pathogenic variant in a single disease-causing gene or locus results in a
predictable disease phenotype, to multifactorial inheritance, where a complex trait is determined by a combina-
tion of various genetic and nongenetic susceptibility factors. Between these extremes is a continuum of genetic
influence on disease pathophysiology. Mendelian disease traits represent the most basic and simple pattern of
inheritance: variants in disease-associated genes result in specific observable inheritance patterns in families (ver-
tical autosomal dominant, AD; horizontal or autosomal recessive, AR; diagonal X-linked, XL; maternal, mitochon-
drial) often dictated by the molecular consequence of the variant at the locus. Non-Mendelian traits reveal some
complexity in their mode of inheritance, often due to epigenetic factors associated with disease mechanisms.
Oligogenic inheritance involves interaction between two or more genes in disease manifestation. Complex traits can
involve multiple genes as susceptibility or protective factors, that lead to disease when combined with other
intrinsic (e.g., comorbid health conditions) and extrinsic (e.g., environment, lifestyle, diet, infection, drug expo-
sure) factors.
Regardless of the mode of inheritance, defining specific genetic factors that are associated with certain diseases
and their functional role in phenotypic manifestations is important for patient diagnosis, patient management
and genetic counseling in families, as well as for understanding disease mechanisms at the molecular level and
ultimately developing new therapeutic approaches. In this chapter, we review the modes of inheritance that can
be observed in various human neurologic and psychiatric diseases, and how genetics and more recently geno-
mics is increasing our molecular understanding of neurological disease.
Mendelian traits
Mendel’s laws
The basic rules of inheritance were established by Gregor Mendel, based upon his observation of the segregation
of traits (i.e., phenotypes that segregated in specific patterns or ratios during transmission from parents to off-
spring) in the common garden pea.2 Mendel’s first law, the principle of independent segregation, referred to as the
ability of genes, which he called factors, to segregate independently during the formation of gametes or sex cells.
Mendel’s second law, the principle of independent assortment, was derived from his observations using peas that
differed by more than one characteristic or trait. Mendel postulated that only one factor from each pair was inde-
pendently transmitted to the gamete during sex-cell formation and that any one gamete contains only one type of
inherited factor from each pair. There is no tendency for genes arising from one parent to stay together. Of course,
we now know that this latter principle is true only for unlinked genes. Genes or loci that are linked, or physically
located in close proximity on the same chromosome, do not assort independently. The closer these loci are, the
more frequently they will cosegregate and it is this principle that is the basis of genetic linkage mapping.
Mendelian inheritance
Mendelian traits are determined by a single gene or locus. Pathogenic variants at such loci result in diseases
that follow Mendel’s laws of segregation and independent assortment. The three major patterns of Mendelian
inheritance are AD, AR, and XL (Fig. 1.1). Mendelian inheritance patterns refer to observable traits and not to
genes. Thus some alleles at a specific locus may lead to traits that segregate in a dominant manner, whereas other
alleles at the same locus may segregate in a recessive manner.
AD alleles exert their effect despite the presence of a corresponding normal allele on the homologous chromo-
some. A vertical transmission pattern is observed in the pedigree, with the trait manifested in approximately half
of the individuals in each generation (Fig. 1.1A). An affected individual will have a 50% chance of transmitting
the disease to each independent offspring, which is a reflection of whether a mutant or a normal allele is segre-
gated in the gamete involved in fertilization. Reduced penetrance is sometimes observed with AD traits, whereby
individuals with the mutant allele do not manifest disease.
In AR inheritance, both alleles must be abnormal for the disease trait to be expressed. The unaffected parents
of an affected child are obligate heterozygote carriers for the recessive mutant allele. Affected children may be
homozygous for a specific recessive mutant allele, as is more commonly observed with consanguineous matings,
or they may be compound heterozygotes for two different alleles. Couples who are heterozygous carriers of a
recessive mutant allele have a 25% risk of having an affected child with each pregnancy. The pattern of transmis-
sion observed in the pedigree is horizontal, with multiple members of one generation affected (Fig. 1.1B).
Unaffected siblings of an affected individual have a 67% (two-thirds) chance of being a carrier for the mutant
allele.
X-linked inheritance patterns reflect special circumstances regarding sex chromosomes. Females have two
X-chromosomes, while males have one X-chromosome and one Y-chromosome. In X-linked recessive inheritance,
a mutation in a gene located on the X-chromosome may not express itself in females because of the normal copy
on the other X-chromosome. However, all males who inherit the mutant allele will be affected. An important fea-
ture of X-linked inheritance is that male-to-male transmission never occurs because the father contributes the
Y-chromosome and not the X-chromosome to his sons. However, all female offspring of affected males inherit
the abnormal allele. Therefore affected fathers will have genetically normal sons and obligate carrier daughters
(Fig. 1.1C).
X-linked recessive disorders may sometimes manifest in females because of a skewing in the process of lyoniza-
tion or X-inactivation. Under normal circumstances, the expression of one of the two X-chromosomes in females
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside
the United States, check the laws of your country in addition to
the terms of this agreement before downloading, copying,
displaying, performing, distributing or creating derivative works
based on this work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The
Foundation makes no representations concerning the copyright
status of any work in any country other than the United States.
1.E.6. You may convert to and distribute this work in any binary,
compressed, marked up, nonproprietary or proprietary form,
including any word processing or hypertext form. However, if
you provide access to or distribute copies of a Project
Gutenberg™ work in a format other than “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other format used in the official version posted on the official
Project Gutenberg™ website (www.gutenberg.org), you must,
at no additional cost, fee or expense to the user, provide a copy,
a means of exporting a copy, or a means of obtaining a copy
upon request, of the work in its original “Plain Vanilla ASCII” or
other form. Any alternate format must include the full Project
Gutenberg™ License as specified in paragraph 1.E.1.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive
from the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.