Research Chapter 10
Research Chapter 10
10
“ ”
Pretesting a questionnaire is absolutely essential
Objectives [ After reading this chapter, the student should be able to: ]
1. Explain the purpose of a questionnaire and its objectives of asking questions
that the respondents can and will answer, encouraging respondents, and
minimizing response error.
2. Describe the process of designing a questionnaire, the steps involved, and
guidelines that must be followed at each step.
3. Discuss the observational form of data collection and specify the who, what,
when, where, why, and way of behavior to be observed.
4. Discuss the considerations involved in designing questionnaires for interna-
tional marketing research.
5. Understand the ethical issues involved in questionnaire design.
6. Discuss the use of the Internet and computers in designing questionnaires.
Questionnaire and Form Design
Overview Questionnaire or form design is an important step in formulating a research design. Once the
researcher has specified the nature of the research design (Chapters 3 through 7) and deter-
mined the scaling procedures (Chapters 8 and 9), a questionnaire or an observational form can
be developed. This chapter discusses the importance of questionnaires and observational
forms. Next, we describe the objectives of a questionnaire and the steps involved in designing
questionnaires. We provide several guidelines for developing sound questionnaires. We also
consider the design of observation forms. The considerations involved in designing question-
naires when conducting international marketing research are discussed. Several ethical issues
that arise in questionnaire design are identified.
As a result of improved
design, mail response
rates to the Census
2000 questionnaires
were about 10 percent
higher than in 1990.
304 PART II • RESEARCH DESIGN FORMULATION
The questionnaire was considerably shortened. Whereas the 1990 short form contained 12 subjects,
the 2000 short form had only 7 subjects (name, sex, age, relationship, Hispanic origin, and race for each
household member, as well as whether the home was owned or rented). Likewise, the long form for 2000
had 34 subjects instead of 38 for 1990.
Once the content of the questionnaire was determined, it was time to work on the structure and
actual wording of the statements. The hard part of the process was making the questions short enough
to keep respondents interested, but long enough to obtain the necessary data. Each question had to be
clearly defined using unambiguous words. A review was conducted of the 1990 census questions to
determine which ones needed to be revised. After determining the content, structure, wording, and
sequence of questions, the Bureau looked to a New York design firm, Two Twelve Associates
(www.twotwelve.com), to improve form and layout and develop visual imagery for the questionnaire,
including a logo and slogan.
The revised questionnaire was thoroughly pretested. The most extensive pretest was the 1996 National
Content Survey (formally known as the U.S. Census 2000 Test), which was designed to test new and
revised question wording, formatting, and sequencing.
During actual data collection, a card was first mailed before the questionnaire was sent and respondents
were given the option to request the questionnaire in English, Spanish, Chinese, Korean, Vietnamese, or
Tagalog. Then the questionnaire package was sent in an official envelope with the Census logo on the front.
A note on the envelopes reminded the recipients that their response was required by law.
As a result of the user-friendly format of the 2000 questionnaires, mail response rates were about
10 percent higher than in 1990. The consensus was that the 2000 questionnaires were much improved over
those used a decade earlier. The Bureau has continued to redesign the Census questionnaire. The American
Community Survey is a nationwide survey designed to provide communities a fresh look at how they are
changing. It will replace the decennial long form in future censuses and is a critical element in the Census
Bureau’s reengineered 2010 census.1 ■
conduct personal interviews or make observations in different parts of the country, the data they
collect will not be comparable unless they follow specific guidelines and ask questions and
record answers in a standard way. A standardized questionnaire or form will ensure comparability
of the data, increase speed and accuracy of recording, and facilitate data processing.
1. As the brand manager for Sprite, what information do you need to target this segment?
2. Search the Internet, as well as your library’s online databases, to obtain information that will assist
the brand manager of Sprite in targeting the student segment.
3. You and a fellow student each interview a different respondent (another student) to determine prefer-
ences for soft drinks, without constructing a questionnaire. How comparable are the data each of you
obtained? Next develop a formal questionnaire jointly and each of you administer it to another respon-
dent. Are the data you two obtained more comparable than before? What does this teach you about the
importance of a questionnaire? ■
Questionnaire Definition
questionnaire A questionnaire, whether it is called a schedule, interview form, or measuring instrument, is a
A structured technique for formalized set of questions for obtaining information from respondents. Typically, a questionnaire
data collection that consists is only one element of a data-collection package that might also include (1) fieldwork procedures,
of a series of questions, such as instructions for selecting, approaching, and questioning respondents (see Chapter 13);
written or verbal, that a (2) some reward, gift, or payment offered to respondents; and (3) communication aids, such as
respondent answers.
maps, pictures, advertisements, and products (as in personal interviews) and return envelopes
(in mail surveys). Regardless of the form of administration, a questionnaire is characterized by
some specific objectives.
Objectives of a Questionnaire
Any questionnaire has three specific objectives. First, it must translate the information needed
into a set of specific questions that the respondents can and will answer. Developing questions
that respondents can and will answer and that will yield the desired information is difficult.
Two apparently similar ways of posing a question may yield different information. Hence, this
objective is a challenge.
Second, a questionnaire must uplift, motivate, and encourage the respondent to become
involved in the interview, to cooperate, and to complete the interview. Incomplete interviews
have limited usefulness at best. In designing a questionnaire, the researcher should strive to
minimize respondent fatigue, boredom, incompleteness, and nonresponse. A well-designed
questionnaire can motivate the respondents and increase the response rate, as illustrated by the
Census 2000 questionnaire in the opening example.
Third, a questionnaire should minimize response error. The potential sources of error in
research designs were discussed in Chapter 3, where response error was defined as the error that
arises when respondents give inaccurate answers or their answers are misrecorded or misanalyzed.
A questionnaire can be a major source of response error. Minimizing this error is an important
objective of questionnaire design.
Questionnaire design will be presented as a series of steps (see Figure 10.1). These steps are
(1) specify the information needed, (2) specify the type of interviewing method, (3) determine
the content of individual questions, (4) design the questions to overcome the respondent’s inabil-
ity and unwillingness to answer, (5) decide on the question structure, (6) determine the question
wording, (7) arrange the questions in proper order, (8) identify the form and layout, (9) repro-
duce the questionnaire, and (10) pretest the questionnaire. We will present guidelines for each
step. In practice, the steps are interrelated and the development of a questionnaire will involve
some iteration and looping. For example, the researcher may discover that respondents misun-
derstand all the possible wordings of a question. This may require a loop back to the earlier step
of deciding on the question structure.4
Mail Questionnaire
Please rank-order the following department stores in order of your preference to shop at these stores. Begin
by picking out the one store that you like most and assign it a number 1. Then find the second most preferred
department store and assign it a number 2. Continue this procedure until you have ranked all the stores in
order of preference. The least preferred store should be assigned a rank of 10. No two stores should receive
the same rank number. The criterion of preference is entirely up to you. There is no right or wrong answer.
Just try to be consistent.
Telephone Questionnaire
I will read to you the names of some department stores. Please rate them in terms of your preference to shop
at these stores. Use a 10-point scale, where 1 denotes not so preferred and 10 denotes greatly preferred.
Numbers between 1 and 10 reflect intermediate degrees of preference. Again, please remember that the
higher the number, the greater the degree of preference. Now, please tell me your preference to shop at . . .
(READ ONE STORE AT A TIME)
308 PART II • RESEARCH DESIGN FORMULATION
NOT SO GREATLY
STORE PREFERRED PREFERRED
1. Nordstrom 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
2. Macy’s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
3. Kmart 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4. Kohl’s 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
5. JCPenney 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
6. Neiman Marcus 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
7. Marshalls 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
8. Saks Fifth Avenue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
9. Sears 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10. Wal-Mart 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Personal Questionnaire
(HAND DEPARTMENT STORE CARDS TO THE RESPONDENT) Here is a set of department store
names, each written on a separate card. Please examine these cards carefully. (GIVE RESPONDENT
TIME) Now, please examine these cards again and pull out the card that has the name of the store you like
the most, that is, your most preferred store for shopping. (RECORD THE STORE NAME AND KEEP
THIS CARD WITH YOU) Now, please examine the remaining nine cards. Of these remaining nine stores,
what is your most preferred store for shopping? (REPEAT THIS PROCEDURE SEQUENTIALLY UNTIL
THE RESPONDENT HAS ONLY ONE CARD LEFT)
Electronic Questionnaire
This question for e-mail and Internet questionnaires will be very similar to that for the mail questionnaire;
in all these methods, the questionnaire is self-administered by the respondent. ■
controversial. Sometimes filler questions are asked to disguise the purpose or sponsorship of the
project. Rather than limiting the questions to the brand of interest, questions about competing brands
may also be included to disguise the sponsorship. For example, a survey on personal computers
sponsored by HP may also include filler questions related to Dell and Apple. Questions unrelated to
the immediate problem may sometimes be included to generate client support for the project.
At times, certain questions may be duplicated for the purpose of assessing reliability or validity.5
“Do you think Coca-Cola is a tasty and refreshing soft drink?” (Incorrect)
A “yes” answer will presumably be clear, but what if the answer is “no”? Does this mean
that the respondent thinks that Coca-Cola is not tasty, that it is not refreshing, or that it is neither
double-barreled tasty nor refreshing? Such a question is called a double-barreled question, because two or more
question questions are combined into one. To obtain the required information unambiguously, two distinct
A single question that questions should be asked:
attempts to cover two
issues. Such questions “Do you think Coca-Cola is a tasty soft drink?” and
can be confusing to “Do you think Coca-Cola is a refreshing soft drink?” (Correct)
respondents and result
in ambiguous responses. Another example of multiple questions embedded in a single question is the “why” ques-
tion. In the context of the department store study, consider the question,
The possible answers may include “to buy athletic shoes,” “it is more conveniently located
than other stores,” and “it was recommended by my best friend.” Each of these answers relates to
a different question embedded in the “why” question. The first answer tells why the respondent
shops in the athletic merchandise store, the second answer reveals what the respondent likes
about Nike Town as compared to other stores, and the third answer tells how the respondent
learned about Nike Town. The three answers are not comparable and any one answer may not be
sufficient. Complete information may be obtained by asking two separate questions:
“What do you like about Nike Town as compared to other stores?” and
“How did you first happen to shop in Nike Town?” (Correct)
Most “why” questions about the use of a product or choice alternative involve two aspects:
(1) attributes of the product, and (2) influences leading to knowledge of it.6
ACTIVE RESEARCH
Old Navy: Quality and Style Are Never Old
Visit www.oldnavy.com and conduct an Internet search using a search engine and your library’s online
database to obtain information on Old Navy’s marketing program.
As the CEO of Old Navy, what would you do to improve consumers’ perceptions of the quality of
your brand?
Formulate a double-barreled question to determine consumer perceptions of the quality and style of
Old Navy clothing. Then reformulate this question to obtain unambiguous answers.
In situations where not all respondents are likely to be informed about the topic of interest,
filter questions filter questions that measure familiarity, product use, and past experience should be asked
An initial question in a before questions about the topics themselves.8 Filter questions enable the researcher to filter
questionnaire that screens out respondents who are not adequately informed.
potential respondents to The department store questionnaire included questions related to 10 different department stores,
ensure they meet the ranging from prestigious stores to discount stores. It was likely that many respondents would not be
requirements of the sample.
sufficiently informed about all the stores, so information on familiarity and frequency of patronage
was obtained for each store (see Chapter 1). This allowed for separate analysis of data on stores
about which the respondents were not informed. A “don’t know” option appears to reduce unin-
formed responses without reducing the overall response rate or the response rate for questions about
which the respondents have information. Hence, this option should be provided when the researcher
expects that respondents may not be adequately informed about the subject of the question.9
events that are important or unusual or that occur frequently. People remember their wedding
anniversary and birthday. Likewise, more recent events are remembered better. A grocery shopper
is more likely to remember what was purchased on the last shopping trip as compared to what was
bought three shopping trips ago.
Research indicates that questions that do not provide the respondent with cues to the event,
and rely on unaided recall, can underestimate the actual occurrence of an event. For example,
unaided recall of soft drink commercials could be measured by questions like, “What brands of
soft drinks do you remember being advertised last night on TV?” The aided recall approach
attempts to stimulate the respondent’s memory by providing cues related to the event of interest.
The aided recall approach would list a number of soft drink brands and then ask, “Which of these
brands were advertised last night on TV?” In presenting cues, the researcher must guard against
biasing the responses by employing several successive levels of stimulation. The influence of
stimulation on responses can then be analyzed to select an appropriate level of stimulation.
Context
Some questions may seem appropriate in certain contexts but not in others. For example, questions
about personal hygiene habits may be appropriate when asked in a survey sponsored by the
American Medical Association, but not in one sponsored by a fast-food restaurant. Respondents are
unwilling to respond to questions that they consider inappropriate for the given context. Sometimes,
the researcher can manipulate the context in which the questions are asked so that the questions seem
appropriate. For example, before asking for information on personal hygiene in a survey for a
fast-food restaurant, the context could be manipulated by making the following statement. “As a
fast-food restaurant, we are very concerned about providing a clean and hygienic environment for
our customers. Therefore, we would like to ask you some questions related to personal hygiene.”
Legitimate Purpose
Respondents are also unwilling to divulge information that they do not see as serving a legitimate
purpose. Why should a firm marketing cereals want to know their age, income, and occupation?
Explaining why the data are needed can make the request for the information seem legitimate and
increase the respondents’ willingness to answer. A statement such as, “To determine how the con-
sumption of cereal and preferences for cereal brands vary among people of different ages, incomes,
and occupations, we need information on . . .” can make the request for information seem legitimate.
Sensitive Information
Respondents are unwilling to disclose, at least accurately, sensitive information because this may
cause embarrassment or threaten the respondent’s prestige or self-image. If pressed for the
answer, respondents may give biased responses, especially during personal interviews (see
Chapter 6, Table 6.2).12 Sensitive topics include money, family life, political and religious beliefs,
and involvement in accidents or crimes. The techniques described in the following section can be
adopted to increase the likelihood of obtaining information that respondents are unwilling to give.
3. Ask the question using the third-person technique (see Chapter 5): Phrase the question as if
it referred to other people.
4. Hide the question in a group of other questions that respondents are willing to answer. The
entire list of questions can then be asked quickly.
5. Provide response categories rather than asking for specific figures. Do not ask, “What is your
household’s annual income?” Instead, ask the respondent to check the appropriate income
category: under $25,000, $25,001–$50,000, $50,001–$75,000, or over $75,000. In personal
interviews, give the respondents cards that list the numbered choices. The respondents then
indicate their responses by number.
CHAPTER 10 • QUESTIONNAIRE AND FORM DESIGN 313
6. Use randomized techniques. In these techniques, respondents are presented with two
questions, one sensitive and the other a neutral question with a known probability of a
“yes” response (e.g., “Is your birthday in March?”). They are asked to select one question
randomly, for example, by flipping a coin. The respondent then answers the selected
question “yes” or “no,” without telling the researcher which question is being answered.
Given the overall probability of a “yes” response, the probability of selecting the sensitive
question, and the probability of a “yes” response to the neutral question, the researcher
can determine the probability of a “yes” response to the sensitive question using the law
of probability. However, the researcher cannot determine which respondents have
answered “yes” to the sensitive question.15
Unstructured Questions
unstructured Unstructured questions are open-ended questions that respondents answer in their own words.
questions They are also referred to as free-response or free-answer questions. The following are some
Open-ended questions that examples:
respondents answer in their
own words. 䊉 What is your occupation?
䊉 What do you think of people who patronize discount department stores?
䊉 Who is your favorite political figure?
Open-ended questions are good as first questions on a topic. They enable the respondents to
express general attitudes and opinions that can help the researcher interpret their responses to
structured questions. Unstructured questions have a much less biasing influence on response
than structured questions. Respondents are free to express any views. Their comments and expla-
nations can provide the researcher with rich insights. Hence, unstructured questions are useful in
exploratory research.
A principal disadvantage is that potential for interviewer bias is high. Whether the interview-
ers record the answers verbatim or write down only the main points, the data depend on the skills
of the interviewers. Tape recorders should be used if verbatim reporting is important.
Another major disadvantage of unstructured questions is that the coding of responses is costly
and time-consuming.17 The coding procedures required to summarize responses in a format useful
for data analysis and interpretation can be extensive. Implicitly, unstructured or open-ended ques-
tions give extra weight to respondents who are more articulate. Also, unstructured questions are not
suitable for self- or computer-administered questionnaires (mail, mail panel, CAPI, e-mail, and
Internet), because respondents tend to be more brief in writing than in speaking.
Precoding can overcome some of the disadvantages of unstructured questions. Expected
responses are recorded in multiple-choice format, although the question is presented to the respon-
dents as an open-ended question. Based on the respondent’s reply, the interviewer selects the
appropriate response category. This approach may be satisfactory when the respondent can easily for-
mulate the response, and it is easy to develop precoded categories because the response alternatives
are limited. For example, this approach may be used to obtain information on ownership of appli-
ances. It has also been used successfully in business surveys, as shown by the following example.
1. _______ VERIZON
2. _______ SPRINT NEXTEL
3. _______ QWEST
4. _______ AT&T
5. _______ Regional Bell operating co. (insert name)
6. _______ Other (specify)
7. _______ Don’t know/no answer ■
In general, open-ended questions are useful in exploratory research and as opening questions.
Otherwise, their disadvantages outweigh their advantages in a large survey.19
Structured Questions
structured questions Structured questions specify the set of response alternatives and the response format. A structured
Questions that question may be multiple choice, dichotomous, or a scale.
prespecify the set of
response alternatives MULTIPLE-CHOICE QUESTIONS In multiple-choice questions, the researcher provides a choice
and the response format. of answers and respondents are asked to select one or more of the alternatives given. Consider
A structured question the following question.
could be multiple choice,
dichotomous, or a scale. Do you intend to buy a new car within the next six months?
_______ Definitely will not buy
_______ Probably will not buy
_______ Undecided
_______ Probably will buy
_______ Definitely will buy
_______ Other (please specify)
Several of the issues discussed in Chapter 9 with respect to itemized rating scales also apply
to multiple-choice answers. Two additional concerns in designing multiple-choice questions are
the number of alternatives that should be included and order or position bias.
The response alternatives should include the set of all possible choices. The general guideline
is to list all alternatives that may be of importance and include an alternative labeled “Other
(please specify),” as shown here. The response alternatives should be mutually exclusive.
Respondents should also be able to identify one, and only one, alternative, unless the researcher
specifically allows two or more choices (for example, “Please indicate all the brands of soft drinks
that you have consumed in the past week”). If the response alternatives are numerous, consider
using more than one question to reduce the information-processing demands on the respondents.
order or position bias Order or position bias is the respondents’ tendency to check an alternative merely because
A respondent’s tendency to it occupies a certain position or is listed in a certain order. Respondents tend to check the first or
check an alternative merely the last statement in a list, particularly the first. For a list of numbers (quantities or prices), there is
because it occupies a a bias toward the central value on the list. To control for order bias, several forms of the
certain position or is listed questionnaire should be prepared with the order in which the alternatives are listed varied from
in a certain order.
form to form. Unless the alternatives represent ordered categories, each alternative should appear
once in each of the extreme positions, once in the middle, and once somewhere in between.20
Multiple-choice questions overcome many of the disadvantages of open-ended questions,
because interviewer bias is reduced and these questions are administered quickly. Also, coding and
processing of data are much less costly and time-consuming. In self-administered questionnaires,
respondent cooperation is improved if the majority of the questions are structured.
Multiple-choice questions are not without disadvantages. Considerable effort is required to
design effective multiple-choice questions. Exploratory research using open-ended questions may
be required to determine the appropriate response alternatives. It is difficult to obtain information
on alternatives not listed. Even if an “Other (please specify)” category is included, respondents
tend to choose among the listed alternatives. In addition, showing respondents the list of possible
answers produces biased responses. There is also the potential for order bias.21
dichotomous question
A structured question DICHOTOMOUS QUESTIONS A dichotomous question has only two response alternatives: yes or
with only two response no, agree or disagree, and so on. Often, the two alternatives of interest are supplemented by a neutral
alternatives, such as yes alternative, such as “no opinion,” “don’t know,” “both,” or “none.”22 The question asked before about
and no. intentions to buy a new car as a multiple-choice question can also be asked as a dichotomous question.
CHAPTER 10 • QUESTIONNAIRE AND FORM DESIGN 315
Do you intend to buy a new car within the next six months?
___________ Yes
___________ No
___________ Don’t know
The decision to use a dichotomous question should be guided by whether the respondents
approach the issue as a yes-or-no question. Although decisions are often characterized as series of
binary or dichotomous choices, the underlying decision-making process may reflect uncertainty,
which can best be captured by multiple-choice responses. For example, two individuals may be
equally likely to buy a new car within the next six months if the economic conditions remain
favorable. However, one individual, who is being optimistic about the economy, will answer
“yes,” whereas the other, feeling pessimistic, will answer “no.”
Another issue in the design of dichotomous questions is whether to include a neutral response
alternative. If it is not included, respondents are forced to choose between “yes” and “no” even if
they feel indifferent. On the other hand, if a neutral alternative is included, respondents can avoid
taking a position on the issue, thereby biasing the results. We offer the following guidelines. If a
substantial proportion of the respondents can be expected to be neutral, include a neutral alterna-
tive. If the proportion of neutral respondents is expected to be small, avoid the neutral alternative.
The general advantages and disadvantages of dichotomous questions are very similar to those
of multiple-choice questions. Dichotomous questions are the easiest type of questions to code and
analyze, but they have one acute problem: The response can be influenced by the wording of the
question. To illustrate, the statement, “Individuals are more to blame than social conditions for
crime and lawlessness in this country,” produced agreement from 59.6 percent of the respondents.
However, on a matched sample that responded to the opposite statement, “Social conditions are
more to blame than individuals for crime and lawlessness in this country,” 43.2 percent
(as opposed to 40.4 percent) agreed.23 To overcome this problem, the question should be framed
in one way on one-half of the questionnaires and in the opposite way on the other half. This is
referred to as the split ballot technique.
SCALES Scales were discussed in detail in Chapters 8 and 9. To illustrate the difference between
scales and other kinds of structured questions, consider the question about intentions to buy a new
car. One way of framing this using a scale is as follows:
Do you intend to buy a new car within the next six months?
Definitely Probably Probably Definitely
will not buy will not buy Undecided will buy will buy
1 2 3 4 5
This is only one of several scales that could be used to ask this question (see Chapters 8 and 9).
As shown in the following example, a survey may contain different types of questions.
Q. Based on your experience of today’s flight, would you select this airline for your next trip on this route?
________ Definitely would (5)
________ Probably would (4)
________ Might/might not (3)
________ Probably not (2)
________ Definitely not (1) ■
ACTIVE RESEARCH
On the surface, this may seem to be a well-defined question, but we may reach a different
conclusion when we examine it under the microscope of who, what, when, and where. “Who”
in this question refers to the respondent. It is not clear, though, whether the researcher is refer-
ring to the brand the respondent uses personally or the brand used by the household. “What” is
the brand of shampoo. However, what if more than one brand of shampoo is being used?
Should the respondent mention the most preferred brand, the brand used most often, the brand
used most recently, or the brand that comes to mind first? “When” is not clear; does the
researcher mean last time, last week, last month, last year, or ever? As for “where,” it is
implied that the shampoo is used at home, but this is not stated clearly. A better wording for
this question would be:
The answers to this question are fraught with response bias, because the words used to
describe category labels have different meanings for different respondents. Three respondents
who shop once a month may check three different categories: occasionally, sometimes, and
often. A much better wording for this question would be the following:
Note that this question provides a consistent frame of reference for all respondents.
Response categories have been objectively defined, and respondents are no longer free to inter-
pret them in their own way.
Additionally, all-inclusive or all-exclusive words may be understood differently by different
people. Some examples of such words are “all,” “always,” “any,” “anybody,” “ever,” and
“every.” Such words should be avoided. To illustrate, “any” could mean “every,” “some,” or
“one only” to different respondents, depending on how they look at it.
In deciding on the choice of words, researchers should consult a dictionary and thesaurus
and ask the following questions of each word used:
1. Does it mean what we intended?
2. Does it have any other meanings?
3. If so, does the context make the intended meaning clear?
4. Does the word have more than one pronunciation?
5. Is there any word of similar pronunciation that might be confused with this word?
6. Is a simpler word or phrase suggested?
The U.S. Census Bureau took great pains to use ordinary and unambiguous words in the
Census 2000 questionnaires, which not only improved the response rate but also resulted in more
accurate data (see opening example).
318 PART II • RESEARCH DESIGN FORMULATION
ACTIVE RESEARCH
A lot ________
A little ________
Not too much ________
Don’t know ________ ■
Type of Information
The type of information obtained in a questionnaire may be classified as (1) basic information,
(2) classification information, and (3) identification information. Basic information relates directly
classification to the research problem. Classification information, consisting of socioeconomic and demo-
information graphic characteristics, is used to classify the respondents and understand the results.
Socioeconomic and Identification information includes name, postal address, e-mail address, and telephone number.
demographic Identification information may be obtained for a variety of purposes, including verifying that the
characteristics used to
respondents listed were actually interviewed, remitting promised incentives, and so on. As a
classify respondents.
general guideline, basic information should be obtained first, followed by classification and, finally,
identification identification information. The basic information is of greatest importance to the research project
information and should be obtained first, before we risk alienating the respondents by asking a series of personal
A type of information questions. The questionnaire given in problem 7 (see exercises for this chapter) incorrectly obtains
obtained in a questionnaire identification (name) and some classification (demographic) information in the beginning.
that includes name, postal
address, e-mail address, Difficult Questions
and phone number.
Difficult questions or questions that are sensitive, embarrassing, complex, or dull should be
placed late in the sequence. After rapport has been established and the respondents become
involved, they are less likely to object to these questions. Thus in the department store project,
information about credit card debt was asked at the end of the section on basic information.
Likewise, income should be the last question in the classification section, and telephone number
the final item in the identification section.
Logical Order
Questions should be asked in a logical order. All of the questions that deal with a particular topic
should be asked before beginning a new topic. When switching topics, brief transitional phrases
should be used to help respondents switch their train of thought.
branching questions Branching questions should be designed carefully.35 Branching questions direct respondents
Question used to guide to different places in the questionnaire based on how they respond to the question at hand. These
an interviewer through a questions ensure that all possible contingencies are covered. They also help reduce interviewer and
survey by directing the respondent error and encourage complete responses. Skip patterns based on the branching
interviewer to different questions can become quite complex. A simple way to account for all contingencies is to prepare a
spots on the questionnaire
flowchart of the logical possibilities and then develop branching questions and instructions based
depending on the answers
on it. A flowchart used to assess the use of credit in store purchases is shown in Figure 10.2.
given.
Placement of branching questions is important, and the following guidelines should be
followed: (1) The question being branched (the one to which the respondent is being
directed) should be placed as close as possible to the question causing the branching, and
(2) the branching questions should be ordered so that the respondents cannot anticipate what
additional information will be required. Otherwise, the respondents may discover that they
can avoid detailed questions by giving certain answers to branching questions. For example,
the respondents should first be asked if they have seen any of the listed commercials before
they are asked to evaluate commercials. Otherwise, the respondents will quickly discover that
stating they have seen a commercial leads to detailed questions about that commercial and
that they can avoid detailed questions by stating that they have not seen the commercial.
Yes No
Other
No
ACTIVE RESEARCH
Flat Panel Television Sets: The Market Is Anything but Flat
Conduct an Internet search using a search engine and your library’s online database to obtain information
on consumers’ perceptions, preferences, and purchase intentions for flat panel television sets.
Specify the information needed and the order in which you would obtain information on consumers’
perceptions, preferences, and purchase intentions for Samsung flat panel television sets.
As the vice president for marketing, what marketing strategies would you formulate to increase
Samsung’s penetration of the flat panel television market?
It is a good practice to divide a questionnaire into several parts. Several parts may be needed for
questions pertaining to the basic information. The questions in each part should be numbered,
particularly when branching questions are used. Numbering of questions also makes the coding
precoding of responses easier. The questionnaires should preferably be precoded. In precoding, the codes
In questionnaire design, to enter in the computer are printed on the questionnaire. Typically, the code identifies the line
assigning a code to every number and the column numbers in which a particular response will be entered. Note that when
conceivable response CATI or CAPI is used, the precoding is built into the software. Coding of questionnaires is
before data collection. explained in more detail in Chapter 14 on data preparation. Here we give an example of a
precoded questionnaire. To conserve space, only part of the questionnaire is reproduced.
2. After you have finished reading an issue of The American Lawyer, what do you usually do with it?
Save entire issue for firm library . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -1 Place in a waiting room/public area ⵧ -5
Save entire issue for home use . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -2 Discard it . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -6
Pass it along to others in my company . . . . . . . ⵧ -3 Other __________________________ ⵧ -7
Clip and save items of interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -4 (Please specify)
3. Not including yourself, how many other people, on the average, would you estimate read or look
through your personal copy (not the office copy) of The American Lawyer?
Number of additional readers per copy:
One . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -1 Five . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -5 10 –14 . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -9
Two . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -2 Six . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -6 15 or more . . . . . . . . ⵧ -x
Three . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -3 Seven . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -7 None . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -0
Four . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -4 8–9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ⵧ -8
Source: www.americanlawyer.com. ■
The questionnaires themselves should be numbered serially. This facilitates the control of
questionnaires in the field as well as the coding and analysis. Numbering makes it easy to
account for the questionnaires and to determine if any have been lost. A possible exception to
this rule is mail questionnaires. If these are numbered, respondents assume that a given
number identifies a particular respondent. Some respondents may refuse to participate or may
answer differently under these conditions. However, recent research suggests that this loss of
anonymity has little, if any, influence on the results.36
the answer to the branching question was recorded. Surveys directed at different respondent
groups can be reproduced on different colored paper. In a mail survey conducted for a major
telecommunications firm, the business questionnaire was printed on white paper, whereas the
household questionnaire was printed on yellow paper.
The questionnaire should be reproduced in such a way that it is easy to read and answer. The
type should be large and clear. Reading the questionnaire should not impose a strain. Several
technologies allow researchers to obtain better print quality and simultaneously reduce costs.
One effort along these lines resulted in a lowering of printing costs from $1,150 to $214.37
Pretesting
pretesting Pretesting refers to the testing of the questionnaire on a small sample of respondents to identify
The testing of the and eliminate potential problems. Even the best questionnaire can be improved by pretesting. As a
questionnaire on a small general rule, a questionnaire should not be used in the field survey without adequate pretesting.
sample of respondents for A pretest should be extensive, as illustrated by the Census 2000 questionnaire in the opening example.
the purpose of improving
All aspects of the questionnaire should be tested, including question content, wording, sequence,
the questionnaire by
form and layout, question difficulty, and instructions. The respondents in the pretest should be
identifying and eliminating
potential problems.
similar to those who will be included in the actual survey in terms of background characteristics,
familiarity with the topic, and attitudes and behaviors of interest.38 In other words, respondents for
the pretest and for the actual survey should be drawn from the same population.
Pretests are best done by personal interviews, even if the actual survey is to be conducted by
mail, telephone, or electronic means, because interviewers can observe respondents’ reactions and
attitudes. After the necessary changes have been made, another pretest could be conducted by mail,
telephone, or electronic means if those methods are to be used in the actual survey. The latter
pretests should reveal problems peculiar to the interviewing method. To the extent possible, a
pretest should involve administering the questionnaire in an environment and context similar to
that of the actual survey.
A variety of interviewers should be used for pretests. The project director, the researcher who
developed the questionnaire, and other key members of the research team should conduct some
pretest interviews. This will give them a good feel for potential problems and the nature of the
expected data. Regular interviewers, however, should conduct most of the pretest interviews. It is
good practice to employ both experienced and new interviewers. The experienced interviewers
can easily perceive uneasiness, confusion, and resistance in the respondents. New interviewers
can help the researcher identify interviewer-related problems. Ordinarily, the pretest sample size
is small, varying from 15 to 30 respondents for the initial testing, depending on the heterogeneity
of the target population. The sample size can increase substantially if the pretesting involves
several stages or waves.
Protocol analysis and debriefing are two commonly used procedures in pretesting. In proto-
col analysis, the respondent is asked to “think aloud” while answering the questionnaire.
Typically, the respondent’s remarks are tape-recorded and analyzed to determine the reactions
invoked by different parts of the questionnaire. Debriefing occurs after the questionnaire has
been completed. Respondents are told that the questionnaire they just completed was a pretest
and the objectives of pretesting are described to them. They are then asked to describe the
meaning of each question, to explain their answers, and to state any problems they encountered
while answering the questionnaire.
Editing involves correcting the questionnaire for the problems identified during pretesting.
After each significant revision of the questionnaire, another pretest should be conducted, using a
different sample of respondents. Sound pretesting involves several stages. One pretest is a bare
minimum. Pretesting should be continued until no further changes are needed.
Finally, the responses obtained from the pretest should be coded and analyzed. The analysis
of pretest responses can serve as a check on the adequacy of the problem definition and the data
and analysis required to obtain the necessary information. The dummy tables prepared before
developing the questionnaire will point to the need for the various sets of data. If the response to a
question cannot be related to one of the preplanned dummy tables, either those data are superflu-
ous, or some relevant analysis has not been foreseen. If part of a dummy table remains empty, a
necessary question may have been omitted. Analysis of pretest data helps to ensure that all data
collected will be utilized and that the questionnaire will obtain all the necessary data.39 Table 10.1
summarizes the questionnaire design process in the form of a checklist.
CHAPTER 10 • QUESTIONNAIRE AND FORM DESIGN 325
TABLE 10.1
Questionnaire Design Checklist
Step 1 Specify the information needed.
1. Ensure that the information obtained fully addresses all the components of the problem. Review components of the
problem and the approach, particularly the research questions, hypotheses, and the information needed.
2. Prepare a set of dummy tables.
3. Have a clear idea of the target population.
Step 2 Specify the type of interviewing method.
1. Review the type of interviewing method determined based on considerations discussed in Chapter 6.
Step 3 Determine the content of individual questions.
1. Is the question necessary?
2. Are several questions needed instead of one to obtain the required information in an unambiguous manner?
3. Do not use double-barreled questions.
Step 4 Design the questions to overcome the respondent’s inability and unwillingness to answer.
1. Is the respondent informed?
2. If respondents are not likely to be informed, filter questions that measure familiarity, product use, and past experience
should be asked before questions about the topics themselves.
3. Can the respondent remember?
4. Avoid errors of omission, telescoping, and creation.
5. Questions that do not provide the respondent with cues can underestimate the actual occurrence of an event.
6. Can the respondent articulate?
7. Minimize the effort required of the respondents.
8. Is the context in which the questions are asked appropriate?
9. Make the request for information seem legitimate.
10. If the information is sensitive:
a. Place sensitive topics at the end of the questionnaire.
b. Preface the question with a statement that the behavior of interest is common.
c. Ask the question using the third-person technique.
d. Hide the question in a group of other questions that respondents are willing to answer.
e. Provide response categories rather than asking for specific figures.
f. Use randomized techniques, if appropriate.
Step 5 Decide on the question structure.
1. Open-ended questions are useful in exploratory research and as opening questions.
2. Use structured questions whenever possible.
3. In multiple-choice questions, the response alternatives should include the set of all possible choices and should be
mutually exclusive.
4. In a dichotomous question, if a substantial proportion of the respondents can be expected to be neutral,
include a neutral alternative.
5. Consider the use of the split ballot technique to reduce order bias in dichotomous and
multiple-choice questions.
6. If the response alternatives are numerous, consider using more than one question to reduce the information-processing
demands on the respondents.
Step 6 Determine the question wording.
1. Define the issue in terms of who, what, when, where, why, and way (the six Ws).
2. Use ordinary words. Words should match the vocabulary level of the respondents.
3. Avoid ambiguous words: usually, normally, frequently, often, regularly, occasionally, sometimes, etc.
4. Avoid leading questions that clue the respondent to what the answer should be.
5. Avoid implicit alternatives that are not explicitly expressed in the options.
6. Avoid implicit assumptions.
7. Respondents should not have to make generalizations or compute estimates.
8. Use positive and negative statements.
(continued)
326 PART II • RESEARCH DESIGN FORMULATION
TABLE 10.1
Questionnaire Design Checklist (continued)
Step 7 Arrange the questions in proper order.
1. The opening questions should be interesting, simple, and nonthreatening.
2. Qualifying questions should serve as the opening questions.
3. Basic information should be obtained first, followed by classification, and, finally, identification information.
4. Difficult, sensitive, or complex questions should be placed late in the sequence.
5. General questions should precede the specific questions.
6. Questions should be asked in a logical order.
7. Branching questions should be designed carefully to cover all possible contingencies.
8. The question being branched should be placed as close as possible to the question causing the branching, and the branch-
ing questions should be ordered so that the respondents cannot anticipate what additional information will be required.
Step 8 Identify the form and layout.
1. Divide a questionnaire into several parts.
2. Questions in each part should be numbered.
3. The questionnaire should be precoded.
4. The questionnaires themselves should be numbered serially.
Step 9 Reproduce the questionnaire.
1. The questionnaire should have a professional appearance.
2. Booklet format should be used for long questionnaires.
3. Each question should be reproduced on a single page (or double-page spread).
4. Vertical response columns should be used.
5. Grids are useful when there are a number of related questions that use the same set of response categories.
6. The tendency to crowd questions to make the questionnaire look shorter should be avoided.
7. Directions or instructions for individual questions should be placed as close to the questions as possible.
Step 10 Eliminate bugs by pretesting.
1. Pretesting should be done always.
2. All aspects of the questionnaire should be tested, including question content, wording, sequence, form and layout,
question difficulty, and instructions.
3. The respondents in the pretest should be similar to those who will be included in the actual survey.
4. Begin the pretest by using personal interviews.
5. Pretest should also be conducted by mail, telephone, or electronic interviewing if those methods are to be used in the
actual survey.
6. A variety of interviewers should be used for pretests.
7. The pretest sample size is small, varying from 15 to 30 respondents for the initial testing.
8. Use protocol analysis and debriefing to identify problems.
9. After each significant revision of the questionnaire, another pretest should be conducted, using a different
sample of respondents.
10. The responses obtained from the pretest should be coded and analyzed.
Observational Forms
Forms for recording observational data are easier to construct than questionnaires. The researcher
need not be concerned with the psychological impact of the questions and the way they are asked.
The researcher need only develop a form that identifies the required information clearly, makes it
easy for the fieldworker to record the information accurately, and simplifies the coding, entry, and
analysis of data.
Observational forms should specify the who, what, when, where, why, and way of behavior
to be observed. In the department store project, an observational form for the study of purchases
would include space for all of the following information.
Project Activities
1. Given the information obtained in the Sears project in Chapter 1, construct an appropriate
questionnaire.
2. Critically evaluate the questionnaire you have constructed using the principles discussed in this chapter.
3. Do you think that the required information can be obtained by observation? If yes, design an
appropriate observation form. ■
The form and layout as well as the reproduction of observational forms should follow the same
guidelines discussed for questionnaires. A well-designed form permits fieldworkers to record
individual observations, but not to summarize observations because that could lead to error.
Finally, like questionnaires, observational forms also require adequate pretesting.
The use of unstructured or open-ended questions may be desirable if the researcher lacks
knowledge about the determinants of response in other countries. Unstructured questions also
reduce cultural bias, because they do not impose any response alternatives. However, unstruc-
tured questions are more affected by differences in educational levels than structured ques-
tions. They should be used with caution in countries with high illiteracy rates. Unstructured
and structured questions can be employed in a complementary way to provide rich insights, as
in the following example.
The questionnaire may have to be translated for administration in different cultures. The researcher
must ensure that the questionnaires in different languages are equivalent. The special procedures
designed for this purpose are discussed in Chapter 24.
Pretesting of the questionnaire is complicated in international research, because the linguistic
equivalence must be pretested. Two sets of pretests are recommended. The translated questionnaire
should be pretested on monolingual subjects in their native language. The original and translated
versions should also be administered to bilingual subjects. The pretest data from administration of
the questionnaire in different countries or cultures should be analyzed and the pattern of responses
compared to detect any cultural biases.
considered “overly long.” Personal in-home interviews can take up to 60 minutes without over-
loading the respondents. Overly long questionnaires are burdensome on the respondents and
adversely affect the quality of responses. Similarly, questions that are confusing, exceed the
respondents’ ability, are difficult, or are otherwise improperly worded should be avoided.
Sensitive questions deserve special attention. On one hand, candid and honest responses are
needed to generate meaningful findings. On the other hand, the researcher should not invade
respondents’ privacy or cause them undue stress. The guidelines we have given in this chapter
should be followed. To minimize discomfort, it should be made clear at the beginning of the inter-
view that respondents are not obligated to answer any question that makes them uncomfortable.
An important researcher–client issue is piggybacking, which occurs when a questionnaire
contains questions pertaining to more than one client. This is often done in omnibus panels
(see Chapters 3 and 4) that different clients can use to field their questions. Piggybacking can
substantially reduce costs and can be a good way for clients to collect primary data they would
not be able to afford otherwise. In these cases, all clients must be aware of and consent to the
arrangement. Unfortunately, piggybacking is sometimes used without the client’s knowledge
for the sole purpose of increasing the research firm’s profit. This is unethical.
Finally, the researcher has the ethical responsibility of designing the questionnaire so as to
obtain the required information in an unbiased manner. Deliberately biasing the questionnaire in
a desired direction—for example, by asking leading questions—cannot be condoned. In deciding
the question structure, the most appropriate rather than the most convenient option should be
adopted, as illustrated by the next example. Also, the questionnaire should be thoroughly
pretested before fieldwork begins, or an ethical breach has occurred.
The Situation
Richard Anderson was the chief executive officer of Delta Air Lines. Under his leadership, on April 14,
2008, Delta Air Lines Inc. and Northwest Airlines Corporation announced an agreement in which the two
carriers will combine in an all-stock transaction with a combined enterprise value of $17.7 billion, creating
America’s premier global airline.
Since 2000, the Global Airline Performance (GAP) study has teamed up P. Robert and Partners and
the London-based Aviation Information and Research unit of IATA, the International Air Transport
Association, to perform a two-part syndicated survey for measuring passenger satisfaction on 22 differ-
ent airlines in 30 different countries. It samples 240,000 passengers each year and is conducted in seven
languages. The interviewers catch the respondents at the most opportune time: while waiting to board
the plane. The first part of the survey consists of 20 questions about the airline staff and their willing-
ness to assist; the second part, one that must be sent by mail or fax, asks questions about the boarding
process, service on the plane, and comfort. Delta’s general manager of marketing research, Paul Lai,
agrees that keeping the information fresh in the respondent’s mind helps get a clearer view of how the
airline can increase customer satisfaction. Another benefit of the survey is that it is ongoing so that they
can track responses over time. Lai also enjoys receiving the data about other airlines so they can
CHAPTER 10 • QUESTIONNAIRE AND FORM DESIGN 331
conduct comparative analyses and identify areas in which Delta is lagging the competition. The survey
revealed to Delta and other airlines that two service issues are most important. One is the operational
service such as arrival/departure times without delays. The second is more subjective and cannot be
controlled as easily—airline employee and customer relations. If Paul Lai remains in tune with the sur-
veys performed by GAP, Delta will have no problem staying ahead of the flight competition.
SPSS Windows
SPSS Data Entry can help the researcher in designing a questionnaire, facilitated by the
drag-and-drop feature of the program.
Summary
To collect quantitative primary data, a researcher must have been worded, the order in which they will appear in the
design a questionnaire or an observation form. A question- questionnaire must be decided (step 7). Special consideration
naire has three objectives. It must translate the information should be given to opening questions, type of information,
needed into a set of specific questions the respondents can difficult questions, and the effect on subsequent questions. The
and will answer. It must motivate respondents to complete questions should be arranged in a logical order.
the interview. It must also minimize response error. The stage is now set for determining the form and layout
Designing a questionnaire is an art rather than a sci- of the questions (step 8). Several factors are important in
ence. The process begins by specifying (step 1) the informa- reproducing the questionnaire (step 9). These include appear-
tion needed and (step 2) the type of interviewing method. ance, use of booklets, fitting entire question on a page,
The next (step 3) is to decide on the content of individual response category format, avoiding overcrowding, place-
questions. The question should overcome the respondents’ ment of directions, color coding, easy-to-read format, and
inability and unwillingness to answer (step 4). Respondents cost. Last but not least is pretesting (step 10). Important
may be unable to answer if they are not informed, cannot issues are the extent of pretesting, nature of respondents, type
remember, or cannot articulate the response. The unwilling- of interviewing method, type of interviewers, sample size,
ness of the respondents to answer must also be overcome. protocol analysis and debriefing, and editing and analysis.
Respondents may be unwilling to answer if the question The design of observational forms requires explicit
requires too much effort, is asked in a situation or context decisions about what is to be observed and how that behav-
deemed inappropriate, does not serve a legitimate purpose, ior is to be recorded. It is useful to specify the who, what,
or solicits sensitive information. Then comes the decision when, where, why, and way of the behavior to be observed.
regarding the question structure (step 5). Questions can be The questionnaire should be adapted to the specific cul-
unstructured (open ended) or structured to a varying degree. tural environment and should not be biased in terms of any
Structured questions include multiple choice, dichotomous one culture. Also, the questionnaire may have to be suitable
questions, and scales. for administration by more than one method because differ-
Determining the wording of each question (step 6) ent interviewing methods may be used in different countries.
involves defining the issue, using ordinary words, using unam- Several ethical issues related to the researcher–respondent
biguous words, and using dual statements. The researcher relationship and the researcher–client relationship may have
should avoid leading questions, implicit alternatives, implicit to be addressed. The Internet and computers can greatly
assumptions, and generalizations and estimates. Figure 10.3 assist the researcher in designing sound questionnaires and
gives a concept map for question wording. Once the questions observational forms.
332 PART II • RESEARCH DESIGN FORMULATION
Acronyms
The objectives and steps involved in developing a questionnaire The guidelines for reproducing a questionnaire may be summa-
may be defined by the acronym rized by the acronym
Questionnaire: Reproduce:
Objectives Q uestions that respondents can answer R esponse category format
U plift the respondent E ntire question on a page
E rror elimination P rofessional appearance
Steps S pecify the information needed R educe costs
T ype of interviewing method O vercrowding should be avoided
I ndividual question content D irections or instructions
O vercoming inability and U se of booklets
unwillingness to answer C olor coding
N onstructured versus structured questions E asy to read
N onbiased question wording The guidelines for pretesting a questionnaire may be summarized
A rrange the questions in proper order by the acronym
I dentify form and layout
R eproduction of the questionnaire Pretest:
E liminate bugs by pretesting
P rotocol analysis and debriefing
The guidelines for question wording may be summarized by the R espondents from the same population
acronym E xtent: extensive
T ype of interviewing method
Wording: E diting and analysis
W ho, what, when, where, why, and way S ample size: 15 to 30 per iteration
O rdinary words T ype of interviewers
R egularly, normally, usually, etc., should be avoided
D ual statements (positive and negative)
I mplicit alternatives and assumptions should be avoided
N onleading and nonbiasing questions
G eneralizations and estimates should be avoided
The guidelines for deciding on the order of questions may be sum-
marized by the acronym
Order:
O pening questions: simple
R udimentary or basic information should be obtained first
D ifficult questions toward the end
E xamine the influence on subsequent questions
R eview the sequence to ensure a logical order
Exercises
Questions 5. What are the reasons that respondents are unable to answer the
1. What is the purpose of questionnaires and observation forms? question asked?
2. Explain how the mode of administration affects questionnaire 6. Explain the errors of omission, telescoping, and creation.
design. What can be done to reduce such errors?
3. How would you determine whether a specific question should 7. Explain the concepts of aided and unaided recall.
be included in a questionnaire? 8. What are the reasons that respondents are unwilling to answer
4. What is a double-barreled question? specific questions?
334 PART II • RESEARCH DESIGN FORMULATION
9. What can a researcher do to make the request for information 2. List at least 10 ambiguous words that should not be used in
seem legitimate? framing questions.
10. Explain the use of randomized techniques in obtaining sensitive 3. Do the following questions define the issue? Why or why not?
information. a. What is your favorite brand of toothpaste?
11. What are the advantages and disadvantages of unstructured b. How often do you go on a vacation?
questions? c. Do you consume orange juice?
12. What are the issues involved in designing multiple-choice 1. Yes 2. No
questions? 4. Design an open-ended question to determine whether house-
13. What are the guidelines available for deciding on question holds engage in gardening. Also develop a multiple-choice and
wording? a dichotomous question to obtain the same information. Which
14. What is a leading question? Give an example. form is the most desirable?
15. What is the proper order for questions intended to obtain basic, 5. Formulate five questions that ask respondents to provide gen-
classification, and identification information? eralizations or estimates.
16. What guidelines are available for deciding on the form and 6. Develop a series of questions for determining the proportion
layout of a questionnaire? of households with children under age 10 where child abuse
17. Describe the issues involved in pretesting a questionnaire. takes place. Use the randomized response technique.
18. What are the major decisions involved in designing observa- 7. A new graduate hired by the marketing research department of a
tional forms? major telephone company is asked to prepare a questionnaire to
determine household preferences for telephone calling cards.
Problems The questionnaire is to be administered in mall-intercept inter-
1. Develop three double-barreled questions related to flying and views. Using the principles of questionnaire design, critically
passengers’ airline preferences. Also develop corrected versions evaluate this questionnaire, which follows.
of each question.
Activities
Role Playing 10 students using personal interviews. How would you modify
1. You have just been hired as a management trainee by a firm the questionnaire based on the pretest?
that manufactures major appliances. Your boss has asked you 2. Develop a questionnaire for determining household prefer-
to develop a questionnaire to determine how households plan ences for popular brands of cold cereals. Administer the ques-
to buy, purchase, and use major appliances. This questionnaire tionnaire to 10 female head of households using personal
is to be used in a nationwide study. However, you feel that you interviews. How would you modify the questionnaire if it were
do not have the expertise or the experience to construct such a to be administered by telephone? What changes would be nec-
complex questionnaire. Explain this to your boss (role played essary if it were to be administered by mail?
by a fellow student).
2. You are working as an assistant marketing research manager Group Discussion
with a national department store chain. Management, repre- 1. “Because questionnaire design is an art, it is useless to follow a
sented by a group of students, is concerned about the extent of rigid set of guidelines. Rather, the process should be left entirely
shoplifting by the employees. You are assigned the task of to the creativity and ingenuity of the researcher.” Discuss as a
developing a questionnaire to determine the extent of shoplift- small group.
ing by the employees. This questionnaire would be mailed to 2. Discuss as a small group the role of questionnaire design in
employees nationwide. Explain your approach to designing minimizing total research error.
the questionnaire to management. (Hint: Use the randomized 3. Discuss the importance of form and layout in questionnaire
response technique.) construction.
Fieldwork
1. Develop a questionnaire for determining how students select
restaurants. Pretest the questionnaire by administering it to
In 1950, Bill Rosenberg founded the Dunkin’ Donuts chain The company also offers variety—52 flavors of
(www.dunkindonuts.com) by opening the first location in donuts. Recently, Dunkin’ Donuts has expanded its coffee
Quincy, Massachusetts. By 1975, 1,000 locations nation- line (again, due to research and taste testing) to include
wide were grossing a collective $300 million in sales. iced coffees, cappuccinos, lattes, espressos, and flavored
At the beginning of 2008, there were 7,988 Dunkin’ coffees, such as hazelnut coffee.
Donuts stores worldwide, including 5,769 franchised Marketing research showed that customers preferred
restaurants in the United States and 2,219 internationally. an image that related to the common person. They did not
The company clocked worldwide sales of $5.3 billion want a coffee shop that was flashy with lots of bells and
during fiscal year 2007. whistles; they just wanted a common shop that made a
This impressive growth would not have been possible great cup of coffee. Therefore, Dunkin’ Donuts appeals to
without extensive marketing research and a commitment just about everyone. During the late 1970s and the 1980s,
to quality. Bill Rosenberg began the culture within the the ad campaign of “Fred the Baker” brought this image to
company of listening to what the customer wanted and life. With commercials showing him waking up in the mid-
then providing it, and that tradition continues today. dle of the night with a commitment to quality, he appealed
Marketing research in the form of focus groups and sur- to the common person. The Mercedes and the pickup truck
vey research revealed that customers select a coffee and come together in an egalitarian Dunkin’ Donuts parking
donut shop based on five factors: accessibility, quality, lot. In addition, Dunkin’ Donuts is affordable. Just about
variety, image, and affordability. The company’s business any consumer can afford the Dunkin’ Donuts experience.
is built around these factors. From research, Dunkin’ Dunkin’ Donuts is much less expensive compared to
Donuts found that its customers wanted a coffee and Starbucks and other upscale coffee shops.
donut shop that was very accessible—close to work or Dunkin’ Donuts realizes that first and foremost its
home and easy to get to. To accompany its stand-alone donuts and coffee need to be up to par to customers’ expec-
locations, Dunkin’ Donuts has opened locations in Home tations. Already the retail market leader in donuts and
Depot, Wal-Mart, 7-11, and Stop & Shop stores to add to bagels, Dunkin’ Donuts knows that it takes a commitment
the convenience that customers desire. Every location is to marketing research to stay there. Bob Pitts, the current
strategically placed and designed with these customers’ Technology Product Developer, demands a continuing
preferences in mind. Because these purchases are so con- commitment to listening to what the customers prefer.
venience driven, the locations can be placed close Again, this manifests itself through constant research and
together without cannibalizing business. taste testing. The customer is a very important source of
Marketing research further revealed that quality wisdom and insight at Dunkin’ and customer opinion and
translates to freshness in the donut business. Therefore, feedback is important. Customers’ preferences have not
Dunkin’ Donuts makes donuts at least four times a day. only shaped the recipes of donuts and bagels, but they have
Upon conducting research with survey questionnaires also prompted the introduction of the Dunkin’ Decaf and
and taste testing in many different markets, Dunkin’ flavored coffees such as Hazelnut and French Vanilla. The
Donuts found the blend of coffee that customers favor the huge success of these introductions reaffirmed the impor-
most. This coffee is brewed and then allowed to sit for no tance of customers to Dunkin’ Donuts and its new products.
longer than 18 minutes. After the 18-minute window, the This journey of innovation has continued with the launch of
coffee is poured out, and a fresh pot is brewed. This com- indulgent coffee drinks, such as cappuccinos, lattes, and
mitment to quality was made as a result of researching espressos. In August 2007, Dunkin’ announced a partner-
what the customer desired in a cup of coffee. ship with Procter & Gamble. In this alliance, P&G roasts
CHAPTER 10 • QUESTIONNAIRE AND FORM DESIGN 337