Determinants of Safe Organizational Climate
Determinants of Safe Organizational Climate
Determinants of Safe Organizational Climate
Environmental Conditions
Safety
Climate
Safety
Communication
Organizational
Climate
Employee
Performance
Table 6 ANOVAa
Sum of Mean
Model df F Sig.
Squares Square
Regression 2604.36 1 2604.36 268.45 .000b
1 Rersidual 805.22 83 9.70
Total 3409.58 84
a. Dependent Variable: Safety climate
b. Predictors: (Constant), working condition
Output of table 6 that shows ANOVA statistics includes F statistics value is 268 and it is significant at
5%. This means that model is statistically reliable.
Table 7 Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) -1.12 .88 -1.35 .180
1 working
.83 .05 .87 16.39 .000
condition
a. Dependent Variable: Safety climate
Since the above table shows that t value = 16.385 which is beyond the tabulated value of t=2.000 for the
five percent of level of significance with degree of freedom (df). Therefore, environmental condition has
positive and significant impact on safety climate, and there is significant relationship between
environmental condition and safety climate at 5% level of significant mean that we are 95% confident
that this relationship exists. Thus, we reject H1 that environmental conditions are negatively related to
safety climate.
H2: Safety Policies and Programs have positive and significant impact on safety climate.
Table 8 Model Summary
Std. Error of the
Model R R Square Adjusted R Square
Estimate
1 .665a .443 .436 4.784
a. Predictors: (Constant), Safety policies & programs
The above table provides information of R and R Square. The value of R is 0.665 which represent the
strong correlation. This means that variables safety policy and program and safety climate varies together
94% of the time. The value of R Square 0.443, this means that 44% of the total variation in the safety
climate is accounted for by the variation in the safety policies and programs.
Table 9 ANOVAa
Sum of Mean
Model df F Sig.
Squares Square
Regression 1509.66 1 1509.66 65.95 .000b
1 Residual 1899.92 83 22.89
Total 3409.58 84
a. Dependent Variable: Safety climate
b. b. Predictors: (Constant), Safety policies and programs
Output of table 9 that shows ANOVA statistics includes F statistics value as 65.951 and significant at 5%.
This means that model is statistically applicable.
Table 10 Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 5.01 1.01 4.94 .000
1
Safety pp .78 .10 .665 8.12 .000
a. Dependent Variable: Safety climate
The above table shows that t value = 8.121 which is beyond the tabulated value of t=2.000 for the five
percent level of significance with degree of freedom (df), we accept the H2 that (safety policy and
program have positive and major effect on safety climate) there is significant relationship between safety
policy and program and safety climate at 5% level of significant mean that we are 95% confident that this
relationship exists.
H3: Organizational climate has positive and significant impact on safety climate.
Table 11 Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square
Square Estimate
a
1 .948 .898 .897 2.045
a. Predictors: (Constant), Organizational climate
The above table provides information of R and R Square. The value of R is 0.948 which represent the
strong correlation. This means that variables organizational climate and safety climate varies together
94% of the time. The value of R Square 0.898, this means that 89% of the total variation in the safety
climate is accounted for by the variation in the organizational climate.
Table 12 ANOVAa
Sum of Mean
Model df F Sig.
Squares Square
Regression 3062.46 1 3062.46 732.26 .000b
1 Residual 347.12 83 4.18
Total 3409.58 84
a. Dependent Variable: Safety climate
b. Predictors: (Constant), Organizational climate
Output of table 12 that shows ANOVA statistics includes F statistics value as 732.2 and significant at 5%.
This means that the model is statistically applicable.
Table 13 Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) 2.28 .42 5.38 .000
1 Org.
.87 .03 .948 27.06 .000
climate
a. Dependent Variable: Safety climate
The above table shows that t value = 27.060 which is beyond the tabulated value of t=2.000 for the five
percent level of significance with degree of freedom (df), we accept the H3 that (organizational climate
has positive and major effect on safety climate) there is significant correlation between organizational
climate and safety climate at 5% level of significant mean that we are 95% confident that this relationship
exists.
H4: Safety communication has positive and significant impact on safety climate.
Table 14 Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square
Square Estimate
a
1 .863 .744 .741 3.24
a. Predictors: (Constant), Safety communication
The above table provides information of R and R Square. The value of R is 0.863 which represent the
strong correlation. This means that variables safety communication and safety climate varies together
86% of the time. The value of R Square 0.744, this means that 74% of the total variation in the safety
climate is accounted for by the variation in the safety communication.
Table 15 ANOVAa
Sum of Mean
Model Df F Sig.
Squares Square
Regression 2536.41 1 2536.41 241.101 .000b
1 Residual 873.17 83 10.52
Total 3409.58 84
a. Dependent Variable: Safety climate
Predictors: (Constant), Organizational climate
Output of table 15 that shows ANOVA statistics includes F statistics value as 241.1 and significant at 5%.
This means that the model is statistically reliable.
Table 16 Coefficientsa
Model Unstandardized Standardized t Sig.
Coefficients Coefficients
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) -.416 .878 -.473 .637
1 Org.
.79 .051 .863 15.53 .000
climate
a. Dependent Variable: Safety climate
The above table shows t value = 15.527 which is beyond the tabulated value of t=2.000 for the five
percent level of significance with degree of freedom (df), we accept the H4 that (safety communication
has positive and significant impact on safety climate) there is significant relationship between
environmental condition and safety climate at 5% level of significant mean that we are 95% confident
that this relationship exists.
H5: Safety climate has positive and significant impact on safety performance.
Table 17 Model Summary
Adjusted R Std. Error of the
Model R R Square
Square Estimate
a
1 .936 .876 .875 2.164
a. Predictors: (Constant), Safety climate
The above table provides information of R and R Square. The value of R is 0.936 which represent the
strong correlation. This means that variables safety climate and safety performance varies together 93%
of the time. The value of R Square 0.876, this means that 87% of the total variation in the safety
performance is accounted for by the variation in the safety climate.
Table 18 ANOVAa
Sum of Mean
Model Df F Sig.
Squares Square
Regression 2758.145 1 2758.145 588.879 .000b
1 Residual 388.749 83 4.684
Total 3146.894 84
a. Dependent Variable: safety performance
Output of table 18 that shows ANOVA statistics includes F statistics value as 588.879 and significant at
5%. This means that the model is statistically applicable.
Table 19 Coefficientsa
Unstandardized Standardized
Model Coefficients Coefficients t Sig.
B Std. Error Beta
(Constant) .708 .505 1.402 .165
1 Org.
.899 .037 .936 24.267 .000
climate
a. Dependent Variable: Safety performance
The above table shows the t value = 24.267 which is beyond the tabulated value of t=2.000 for the five
percent level of significance with degree of freedom (df), we accept the H5 that (safety climate has
positive and significant impact on safety performance) there is significant relationship between safety
climate and safety performance at 5% level of significant mean that we are 95% confident that this
relationship exists.
Conclusion
In this study safety climate and its impact on employees’ performance was investigated. In this research,
four factors are examined, i.e. environmental conditions, safety related policy and program,
organizational climate, and safety communication. The tests have proven that all the factors have a
positive and significant impact on safety climate, and safety climate is positively linked with employees’
performance.
Finally, the study found that environmental conditions, safety related policy and program, organizational
climate, and safety communication have a significant impact on safety climate. Thus, safety performance
of employees depends on safety climate provided by the organization to minimize accidents at the
workplace.
Policy Recommendations
In order to keep workers safe from accidents, the following recommendations are made;
First aid box must be available.
There should be PPE (personal protective equipment) available for workers; it includes gloves,
mask, protective clothes, shoes, and goggles.
Helmets and gloves should be used by workers, while loading and unloading truck, leather gloves
rather than rubber gloves should be used because marble pieces are sharp and cut rubber easily
Provide health insurance to workers.
The minimum wage law provided by the government of Pakistan should be enforced in marble
sector to ensure the fair distribution of rewards among employees.
Filter drinking water are compulsory to have at workplace.
Organization must provide necessary safety training to its workers regularly.
There is need for hospital near industry site.
References
Ahasan, M. R., & Partanen, T. (2001). Occupational health and safety in the least developed countries: A
simple case of neglect. J. Epidemiol, 11(2), 74-80.
Ali, T. H. (2006). Influence of National Culture on Construction Safety Climate in Pakistan. Retrieved
from Griffith University website: https://www120. secure.griffith.edu.au/rch/file/caf59f70-9fa3-433c-
e07c-ac41e57827c2/ 1/02Whole.pdf
Awan, S. (2002). The Development Trends of Occupational Health Services in Pakistan-Current Status
and Future Perspective. World Health Organization, Eastern Mediterranean Regional Office, Cairo,
Egypt.
Baker, S. P., O’Neill, B., Ginsburg, M. J., & Li, G. (1992). The Injury Fact Book. London: Oxford
University Press.
Barling, J., & Hutchinson, I. (2000). Commitment versus control-oriented safety practices, safety
reputation, and perceived safety climate. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17(1), 76– 84.
Bergh, M. (2011). An Evaluation of the Safety Climate at AkzoNobel Site Stenungsund. Retrieved from:
http://www.ips.se/files/pages/27/basta-exjobb-2012-2-klimatundersokn-142447.pdf
Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
Clarke, S. (2000). Safety culture: Under-specified and Overrated? International Journal of Management
Review, 2, 65-90.
Cohen, A. (1977). Factors in successful occupational safety programs. Journal of Safety Research,
9(4), 168–178.
Cole, K. S., Stevens-Adams, S. M., & Wenner, C. A. (2013). A Literature Review of Safety
Culture. Retrieved from http://prod.sandia.gov/techlib/ access-control.cgi/2013/132754.pdf
Cooper, M. D. (2000). Towards a model of safety culture. Safety Science, 36, 111-136.
Dejoy, D. M., Schaffer, B. S., Wilson, M. G., Vandenberg, R. J., & Butts, M. M. (2004). Creating safer
workplaces: assessing the determinants and role of safety climate. Journal of Safety Research,
35, 81– 90.
Demaret, L., Khalef, A. (2004). Worker’s Memorial Day 2204. Safety Net Journal, 6, 23-30.
Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate?
A native's point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. The Academy of Management Review, 21
(3), 619-654.
Diaz, R. I., & Cabrera, D. D. (1997). Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organizational
safety. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 29(5), 643–650.
Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., & Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). perceived organizational support and
employee diligence, commitment, and innovation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(1), 51-59.
Flin, R., Mearns, K., O’Connor, P., & Bryden, R. (2000). Measuring safety climate: identifying the
common features. Safety Science, 34, 177–192.
Florczak, C. M. (2002). Maximizing Profitability with Safety Culture Development. Oxford: Butterworth-
Heinemann.
Fu, G., Zhang, J., Xie, X. & Zhang, Z. (2006). Design for safety climate questionnaire framework.
National Science Foundation of China.
Guldenmund, F. W. (2010). Understanding and Exploring Safety Culture. Oisterwijk: Uitgeverij BOX
Press.
Hadi, T. (2014). Pre-feasibility Study Report Marble/GraniteQuarrying/ Processing Plant. Retrieved
from http://www.sbi.gos.pk/pdf/Marble-Feasibility-report.pdf
Haukelid, K. (2008). Theories of (safety) culture revisited—An anthropological approach. Safety Science,
46(3), 413–426.
Hofmann, D. A., & Morgeson, F. P. (1999). Safety-related behavior as a social exchange: the role of
perceived organizational support and leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology,
84(2), 286-296.
Hogstedt, C. & Pieris, B. (2000). Occupational Health and Safety in Developing Countries: Review of
Strategies, case studies and a bibliography. Retrieved from http://nile.lub.lu.se/arbarch/arb/2000/.
Ibrahim, M. E., Alhallaq, K. A. M., & Enshassi, A. A. (2012). Safety Climate in Construction Industry
the Case of Gaza Strip. Retrieved from IUG website:http://research.iugaza.edu.ps/files/2146.PDF
International Atomic Energy Agency. (1991). Safety Culture. Retrieved from
http://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/publications/PDF/Pub882_web.pdf
James, L. A., & James, L. R. (1989). Integrating work environment perceptions: Explorations into the
measurement of meaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 739–751.
James, L. R., Jones, A.P., (1974). Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological
Bulletin, 81(12), 1096-1112.
Khalil, M. I. K. (2013). job satisfaction and work morale among PhD’s a study of public and private
sector universities of Peshawar, Pakistan. International Review of Management
& Business Research, 2(2), 362-370.
Khan, A.T. (2009, October). Marble resources in Pakistan. The News. Retrieved from
https://tahirkatlang.wordpress.com/2010/06/25/marble-resouces-in-pakistan/
Malik, N. (2010). Perspectives of Occupational Health and Safety in Textile Industry. Retrieved from
http://prr.hec.gov.pk/Thesis/614S.pdf
Mearns, K. J., & Flin, R. (1999). Assessing the State of Occupational Safety Culture or Climate? Current
Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 18, 5-17.
Mosher, G. A. (2011). Measurement and Analysis of the Relationship between Employee Perceptions and
Safety and Quality Decision-Making in the Country Grain Elevator. Retrieved
from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3045&context=etd
Mullen, J. (2004). Investigating Factors that Influence Individual Safety Behavior at Work. Journal of
Safety Research, 35, 275– 285.
National Workshop Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) in Pakistan. (2013, January 27). Retrieved
from http://www.anroev.org/wp-content/ uploads/2013/05/OSH-Workshop-Pakistan.pdf
Neal, A., Griffin, M.A., & Hart, P.M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate &
individual behavior. Safety Science, 34, 99-109.
Pasha, T. S. (2003). Occupational health and safety profiles of Punjab, Pakistan and strategies for its
improvement. Retrieved from http://epublications. uef.fi/pub/urn_isbn_951-781-256-6/urn_isbn_951-
781-256-6.pdf
Schneider, B. (1975). Organizational climates: An essay. Personnel Psychology, 28, 447-479.
Seo, D. C. (2005). An explicative model of unsafe work behavior. Safety Science, 43,187–211.
Shannon, H. S., Mayr, J., & Haines, T. (1997). Overview of the relationship between organizational and
workplace factors and injury rates. Safety Science, 26(3), 201–217.
Verbeke, W., Volgering, M., & Hessels, M. (1998). Exploring the conceptual expansion within the field
of organizational behaviour: organizational climate and organizational culture. Journal of
Management Studies, 35 (3), 303-329.
Wiegmann, D. A., Zhang, H., Thaden, T. V., Sharma, G., & Mitchell, A. (2002). A Synthesis of Safety
Culture and Safety Climate Research. Retrieved from Aviation Research Lab Institute of Aviation
website: http://www.aviation.
Yule, S., Flin, R. (2007).The role of management and safety climate in preventing risk-taking at
work. Int. J. Risk Assessment and Management, 7(2), 137-150.
Zhou, Q., Fang, D. & Wang, X. (2008). A method to identify strategies for the improvement of human
safety behavior by considering safety climate and personal experience. Safety Science, 46, 1406–
1419.
Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: theoretical and applied implications. Journal
of Applied Psychology, 65, 96–102.
Zohar, D. (2000). A group-level model of safety climate: Testing the effect of group climate on micro-
accidents in manufacturing jobs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 587-596.