0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Software Process Models 1

Uploaded by

editxarain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
5 views

Software Process Models 1

Uploaded by

editxarain
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Software Process Models

Software process models provide a structured framework for organizing, planning, and
executing software development. These models guide teams through the steps of the
development lifecycle, ensuring that software is developed in a systematic and organized
way. Here are some common software process models:

1. Waterfall Model

The Waterfall model is one of the earliest software development methodologies, which
follows a linear and sequential approach to software development. In this model, each phase
must be completed before moving to the next one, with no overlap or iteration.

Phases of Waterfall:

 Requirements Analysis: All the requirements for the software are gathered and
documented in detail.
 System Design: The system architecture and design are planned.
 Implementation (Coding): Developers write the code based on the design.
 Integration and Testing: The software is tested to ensure it meets the requirements
and is free from defects.
 Deployment: The software is released for use.
 Maintenance: Post-release support and bug fixes.

Advantages:

 Simple to understand and use.


 Clear structure with well-defined phases.
 Ideal for projects with well-understood requirements.

Disadvantages:

 Inflexible to changes once a phase is completed.


 Late discovery of issues (e.g., errors found only during testing).
 Not suitable for projects with evolving or unclear requirements.
2. V-Model (Verification and Validation)

The V-Model is an extension of the Waterfall model that emphasizes verification and
validation at each stage of development. It is often considered a "Verification and Validation"
model because testing activities are planned in parallel with corresponding development
activities.

Phases of the V-Model:

 Requirements Definition (Validation Phase): Gathering detailed user requirements.


 System Design (Validation Phase): Creating high-level system design and ensuring
it aligns with requirements.
 Architectural Design (Verification Phase): Designing system architecture and
components.
 Module Design (Verification Phase): Designing modules and interfaces.
 Coding (Verification Phase): Writing the code.

In parallel to each phase of development, there is a corresponding testing phase:

 Unit Testing: Corresponds to module design.


 Integration Testing: Corresponds to system design.
 System Testing: Corresponds to system-level validation.
 Acceptance Testing: Corresponds to requirements validation.

Advantages:
 Encourages early testing and validation.
 Well-suited for projects with clear and fixed requirements.
 Offers high quality and reliability due to rigorous validation at each step.

Disadvantages:

 Still quite rigid like the Waterfall model.


 Can be costly and time-consuming due to the need for parallel activities.

3. Incremental Development

The Incremental model divides the software development process into smaller, manageable
parts or "increments," where each increment delivers a functional subset of the final product.
Each increment is developed in a linear or iterative manner, with additional features added in
subsequent increments.

Phases of Incremental Development:

 Requirements gathering: Initial requirements are defined, but only for the first
increment.
 Design: A high-level design is created for the overall system, but detailed design is
done incrementally.
 Implementation: Developers build the system incrementally. The first increment is
completed first, then further increments are added.
 Testing: Each increment is tested thoroughly.
 Deployment: After each increment is completed, the software can be released to
users.

Advantages:

 More flexible and adaptive to changes in requirements.


 Reduces time to market as functional parts are delivered earlier.
 Allows for user feedback on each increment, guiding future development.

Disadvantages:

 Can be difficult to define overall system architecture at the start.


 Requires strong management to coordinate incremental releases.
 Potential for incomplete functionality in early versions.
4. Integration and Configuration (COTS-based Development)

Integration and Configuration (I&C) is a model where software is developed by integrating


pre-existing components or Commercial Off-The-Shelf (COTS) software with custom-
developed modules to create a full system. The model focuses on leveraging reusable
components to reduce development time and cost.

Phases of Integration and Configuration:

 Requirements Analysis: Understanding both the business needs and the capabilities
of existing components.
 Component Selection: Selecting suitable third-party components or frameworks.
 System Design and Integration: Integrating the components into a unified system,
with customizations as needed.
 Customization: Modifying existing components to meet specific needs or to ensure
they work together.
 Testing: Testing the entire system for functionality, integration, and performance.
 Deployment: Deploying the integrated system.
 Maintenance: Ongoing support, including updates to third-party components and the
system itself.

Advantages:

 Faster development due to the reuse of existing components.


 Reduces risk by relying on proven, tested components.
 Can be cost-effective by reducing the need for custom development.

Disadvantages:

 Integration can be complex and challenging, especially if components do not fit well
together.
 Dependencies on third-party vendors for component updates and support.
 Limited flexibility since the system is built around existing solutions.
Comparison of Models

Integration &
Feature Waterfall V-Model Incremental
Configuration
Linear and Linear with Iterative & Component-based
Approach
sequential testing parallel Incremental integration
Flexibility to
Low Low High Moderate
Changes
Done after Parallel with Done after each Ongoing during
Testing
development development increment integration
Cost & Time Low (due to High (due to early High (reuse of
Moderate
Efficiency rigidness) delivery) components)
Low (due to Moderate
Risk High (late
Moderate incremental (integration
Management testing)
releases) complexity)

You might also like