0% found this document useful (0 votes)
118 views31 pages

MathAnalysis 1 (2023)

Uploaded by

royaljunaid2006
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
118 views31 pages

MathAnalysis 1 (2023)

Uploaded by

royaljunaid2006
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 31

Mathematical Analysis

Lecture 1
Elements of mathematical logic, sets of numbers

Aleksandra P¦drak

23rd October 2023

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Organizational issues

E-amil: [email protected]
Course materials:
Claudio Canuto and Anita Tabacco "Mathematical analysis I"
https://www.booksfree.org/mathematical-analysis-i-by-
claudio-canuto-and-anita-tabacco-pdf-free-download/
Lecture presentation slides
Platon educational platform
The course credit:
end-term practical test,
nal theoretical examination (grade 4 or better from the
practical test exempts a student from taking a nal exam),
the presence in the classes is mandatory
Consultation: after every lecture at room 30

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Program of the lecture

Elements of mathematical logic,


Connectives, Predicates, Quantiers;
Types of mathematical proofs (direct proof, proof by
contradiction, proof by construction, proof by mathematical
induction);
Sets, algebra of sets;
Numbers;
Bounded sets, inmum and supremum.

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Elements of mathematical logic
Formula
In Mathematical Logic a formula is a declarative sentence, or
statement, the truth or falsehood of which can be established.
Thus within a certain context a formula carries a truth value: True
or False.
The truth value is represented using the binary value of a memory
bit (1 or 0), True has a logical value 1
False has a logical value 0

Examples:
'7 is an odd number' (True)

'3 > 12' (False)
'Venus is a star' (False)
'Milan is far from Rome' (is not a formula)
'Is it your place?' (is not a formula)

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Elements of mathematical logic
We shall indicate formulas by lower case letters a,b, p, q, r,. . . New
formulas can be built from old ones using logic operations expressed
by certain formal symbols, called connectives.
The basic connectives are: negation (¬, ∼), disjunction (∨),
conjunction (∧), implication (⇒), logic equivalence. (⇔).
Disjunction
The disjunction of p and q is the formula p ∨ q we read it as "p or
q ".
The disjunction is false if p and q are both false. The logical values
of the disjunction p and q are as follows

p q p∨q
0 0 0
1 0 1
0 1 1
1 1 1

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Elements of mathematical logic

Conjunction
The conjunction of two formulas p and q is the formula p ∧ q we
read it as "p and q ". The conjunction is true if both p and q are
true, false otherwise.
The logical values of the conjunction p and q are as follows

p q p∧q
0 0 0
1 0 0
0 1 0
1 1 1

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Elements of mathematical logic

Implication
The implication of two formulas p and q is the formula p ⇒ q we
read it as:
"If p then q "
"p implies q "
"p sucient condition for q "
"q necessary condition for p "
The logical values of the implication p and q are as follows:

p q p⇒q
0 0 1
1 0 0
0 1 1
1 1 1

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Elements of mathematical logic

Logic equivalence
The equivalence of two formulas p and q is the formula p ⇔ q we
read it as:
"p is equivalent to q "
The logical values of the equivalence p and q are as follows:

p q p⇔q
0 0 1
1 0 0
0 1 0
1 1 1

The logical equivalence can be rewriten in the following form:

p ⇔ q ≡ (p ⇒ q) ∧ (q ⇒ p)

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Elements of mathematical logic
Negation
The negation of formula p is formula ¬p we read it as: "not p "
The negation of p is True if p is False, and False if p is True. The
logical values of negation

p ∼p
0 1
1 0

Negation of the basic connectives

¬(p ∧ q) = (¬p) ∨ (¬q) I De Morgan's law


¬(p ∨ q) = (¬p) ∧ (¬q) II De Morgan's law
¬(p ⇒ q) = p ∧ (¬q)
¬(p ⇔ q) = (p ∧ (¬q)) ∨ (q ∧ (¬p))
Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l
Elements of mathematical logic

Predicates
A predicate is an assertion or property p(x, ...) that depends upon
one or more variables x ,... belonging to suitable sets, and which
becomes a formula (hence true or false) whenever the variables are
xed.

Example
Let us consider a predicate:

p(x) = ”x is an odd number”,

then
p(7) is true,
p(10) is false.

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Elements of mathematical logic
The logic operations can be applied to predicates as well, and
give rise to new predicates (e.g., ¬p(x), p(x) ∨ q(x) and so
on).
Using predicates one can dened sets

A = {x ∈ X | p(x)}

is the subset of a given set X , which elements fulll the


'characteristic property' p(x).

Example
Consider the set A = {(x, y ) | x 2 + y 2 ≤ 9}
3

-1

-2

-3

-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Elements of mathematical logic
Universal quantier
Let S(x) be a predicate, the formula

∀x S(x)

we read "for all x , S(x) holds".


Example:
∀x∈N x + 1 ∈ N

Existential quantier
Let S(x) be a predicate, the formula

∃x S(x)

we read "there exists at least one x, such that S(x) holds".


Example:
∃x∈R (x − 1)2 = 0
Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l
Elements of mathematical logic

Sometimes a third quantier is used, ∃!, (existential quantier


with exclamation mark) which means "there exists one and
only one element" or "there exists a unique".
There exist other designation of quantier
W universal quantier
V
existential quantier

De Morgan laws for quantiers

¬ (∀x S(x)) = ∃x ¬S(x)


¬ (∃x S(x)) = ∀x ¬S(x)

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Types of mathematical proofs
Direct proof
In the direct proof one starts from the set of assumptions, mathematical
formulas, h1 , h2 , . . . , hn from which one leads the conclusion c . The conclusion
is established by logically combining the axioms, denitions, and earlier
theorems.
The direct proof rely on justication the following sentence:
(h1 ∧ h2 ∧ · · · ∧ hn ) ⇒ c

Proof by contradiction
In this case we also have to prove the implication:
(h1 ∧ h2 ∧ · · · ∧ hn ) ⇒ c

In proof by contradiction is done by showing that assuming the proposition to


be false leads to a contradiction.
In this method one has to prove that the negation of the above implication is
false. Precisely, the sentence
h1 ∧ h2 ∧ · · · ∧ hn ∧ (∼ c)

is intrinsically contradictory.
Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l
Types of mathematical proofs
Example

Prove that 2 is irrational number.

Suppose that 2 is a rational number.

Then it could be written as common fraction 2 = ba where a
and b are non-zero integers with no common factor.

Thus b 2 = a, squaring both sides one gets 2b 2 = a2 . Thus
the right expression is divisible by 2, so we can write a = 2c
where c is also integer.
Substitution into the original equation yields 2b 2 = 4c 2 ,
dividing both sides by 2 yields b 2 = 2c 2 . But it means that b
must be even number.
This contradicts our previous statement that
√ a and b have no
common factor, so we must conclude that 2 is an irrational
number.
Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l
Types of mathematical proofs

Proof by construction and nonconstructive proof


Proof by construction, or proof by example, is the construction
of a concrete example with a property to show that something
having that property exists.
A nonconstructive proof establishes that a mathematical
object with a certain property existswithout explaining how
such an object can be found.

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Types of mathematical proofs
Mathematical induction
Let p(m) be a predicate where m = m0 , m0 + 1, m0 + 2, . . . . Our task is to
prove truth the predicate p(m) for every m.
Let us consider the following line or reasoning
1 formula p(m0 ) is true for given m0 ,
2 formula p(k + 1) is true, if p(k) is true and m0 ≤ k
It means that predicates p(m) is true for every m ≥ m0

Mathematical induction is based on proving the sequence of implication:


p(m0 ) ⇒ p(m0 + 1) ⇒ p(m0 + 2) ⇒ · · · ⇒ p(k) ⇒ p(k + 1) ⇒ . . .
In the rst step one has to prove the rst formula from the sequence.
Next one needs to prove the implication p(k) ⇒ p(k + 1). It must be
done without assuming the specic value of k .
So then because the rst formula p(m0 ) is true and by substituting
k = m0 in implication p(k) ⇒ p(k + 1) one can conclude that p(m0 + 1)
is true. Next taking k = m0 + 1 one gets that p(m0 + 2) is true, and so
on. Prolonging this procedure to innity one obtains that predicates
p(m0 ) is true for every m ≥ m0 .
Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l
Types of mathematical proofs
Example
Prove the inequality n! > 2n for n ≥ 4, where n! = 1 · 2 · 3 · · · · · (n − 1) · n
(factorial).

We check the inequality for rst element of the sequence


4! > 24 ⇒ 24 > 16

Then we intend to prove the implication


k! > 2k ⇒ (k + 1)! > 2k+1

To do that we assume that the left side of implication is true for a certain
k > 4.
Next we want to draw a conclusion that right side is true
(k + 1)! = k!(k + 1) > 2k (k + 1) > 2k · 2 = 2k+1

Because the rst formula in the sequence is true and the implication
k! > 2k ⇒ (k + 1)! > 2k+1 is also true for every k > 4 by the mathematical
induction theorem the inequality n! > 2n is true for n ≥ 4.
Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l
Algebra of sets

We shall denote sets by upper case letters A, B, X ..., while for the
members or elements of a set lower case letters x, y , ... will be
used. When an element x is in the set X one writes x ∈ X ("x is
an element of X "), otherwise the symbol x ̸∈ X is used.
Union of sets

A∪B = {x | x ∈ A ∨ x ∈ B}

Intersection of sets

A∩B = {x | x ∈ A ∧ x ∈ B}

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Algebra of sets

Dierence of sets

A\B = {x | x ∈ A ∧ x ̸∈ B}

Complement of a set

CA = Ac = X \A = {x | x ̸∈ A}

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Algebra of sets

N = {1, 2, 3, . . . } set of natural numbers


Z = {0, ±1, ±2, . . . } set of integer numbers
n o
Q = qp : p ∈ Z, q ∈ N  set of rational numbers (the
numbers which can be expressed by common fraction)
R set of real numbers

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Bounded sets

Set bounded from below


A set X ⊂ R is bounded from below if there is a real number m,
that for all x ∈ X the inequality is true x ≥ m.

∃m∈R ∀x∈X x ≥m

Every m satisfying this relation is said a lower bound of X .

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Bounded sets

Set bounded from above


A set X ⊂ R is called bounded from above if there exist a real
number M that for all x ∈ X the inequality is true x ≤ M .

∃M∈R ∀x∈X x ≤M

Any M with this property is called an upper bound of X .

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Bounded sets

Bounded set
A set X ⊂ R is bounded if it is bounded from above and from
below.
∃m,M∈R ∀x∈X m ≤ x ≤ M

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Bouned sets

Example
Check if the set A is bounded
 
p
A= : p, q ∈ N ∧ p < q
q

Since
p
p<q ⇒ <1
q
Therefore the upper bound of A is any number M which is M ≥ 1.
On the other hand since p, q ∈ N then p > 0 and q > 0 thus
p
q > 0. According to this the lower bound of A is any number m
which fulll the inequality m ≤ 0.

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Bouned sets
Example
Check if the set B is bounded

B = {x ∈ R : tan(x) = 4}

The set B is a set of solutions equation tan(x) = 4. The graphical

solutions of the equation are the points of intersection of graph of a


function y =tan(x) and line y = 4

Because function tan(x) is periodic then B is not bounded.

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Maximal and minimal elements od a set

Minimal element of a set


Number a is the minimal element of a subset X ⊂ R if and only if

a ∈ X ∧ ∀x∈X x ≥ a

We write it as
a = minX .

Maximal element of set


Number b is the maximal element of a subset X ⊂ R if and only if

b ∈ X ∧ ∀x∈X x ≤ b

We write it as
b = maxX .

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Maximal and minimal elements od a set
Example
Check if sets A an B possess maximal and minimal elements
a) A = [0, 2)
The section A possesses the minimal element that is 0 because
every element of the interval is greater or equal to 0.
The set A does not possess the maximal element because the
right end-point of the interval does not belong to the set A.
n o
1
b) B = 2n− 1 : n ∈ N
Let us write rst few elements of the set B
n 1 2 3 4 ...
1 1 1 1 1
2n−1 1 3 5 7 ...

It is easy to see that the element are getting smaller. Thus the
maximal element is the rst one 1 and set B does not possess
the minimal element.
Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l
Inmum and supremum

Innum of a set
Let set X ⊂ R be bounded from below. Number a is an innum of a set X if
and only if
∀x∈X x ≥ a and ∀ϵ>0 ∃x0 ∈X x0 < a + ϵ
We write it as
a = inf X .
If set X in not bounded from below we take:
inf X = −∞

Remarks:
Innum of a set X is also a lower bound of X .
Innum of a set X is not necessarily an element of a set X .
If on a number line one steps away to the right from the innum by a
arbitrarily small distant ϵ then one get past some element x0 which
belong to the set X .

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Inmum and supremum

Supremum of a set
Let set X ⊂ R be bounded from above. Number a is a supremum of a set X if
and only if
∀x∈X x ≤ b and ∀ϵ>0 ∃x0 ∈X x0 > b − ϵ
We write it as
b = sup X .
If set X in not bounded from above we take:
sup X = ∞

Remarks:
Supremum of a set X is also an upper bound of X .
Supremum of a set X is not necessarily an element of a set X .
If on a number line one steps away to the left from the supremum by a
arbitrarily small distant ϵ then one get past some element x0 which
belong to the set X .

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l


Inmum and supremum
Example
Find innum and supremum of sets A and B
√ √
a) A = (− 2, 5⟩
The section A on a number line has a following form

√ √
Therefore inf A = − 2 and sup A = 5.

b) B = ⟨ 2, ∞) ∩ Q
A set√B is composed of rational numbers which are greater
than 2. The supremum√ of a set is sup B = ∞. The innum
of a set is inf B = 2. It comes from the fact that the real
number √
2 = 1.4142135623730950488 . . .
can be approximate by rational number with arbitrary precision.

Aleksandra P¦drak Mathematical Analysis Lecture 1 Elements of mathematical l

You might also like