The Public Trust Doctrine
The Public Trust Doctrine
The Public Trust Doctrine
The Public Trust Doctrine is a legal principle that holds certain natural
resources in trust for the public, and mandates that the government, as
trustee, must protect and manage those resources for the benefit of the
public. This doctrine is based on the idea that natural resources—such as air,
water, and land—are essential to the well-being and survival of society, and
should be preserved for the use and enjoyment of future generations.
Historical Origins:
The Public Trust Doctrine has its origins in Roman law, where certain
resources like air, water, and the sea were considered to be owned by all
citizens. It was later incorporated into English common law and further
evolved in the United States.
In the U.S., the doctrine was first applied in the 19th century to ensure public
access to navigable waters and the shorelines. It has since expanded to
include the protection of other environmental resources. The most well-
known early case is the U.S. Supreme Court case Illinois Central Railroad v.
Illinois (1892), which affirmed that state governments could not relinquish
public control over the Great Lakes, as these waters were held in trust for
the public.
The principle of the Public Trust Doctrine has also been recognized in
international law. Some international instruments, such as the United
Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP)
and various treaties addressing environmental protection, imply the need for
governments to act as trustees of natural resources for the benefit of the
people and future generations.
1. U.S. Cases: The doctrine has been used in a number of U.S. state and
federal court cases, where judges have ruled that certain
environmental resources cannot be privatized or polluted in ways that
would harm public access and future generations' enjoyment of those
resources.
2. Indian Case Law: In India, the doctrine has been invoked in various
judgments to assert the government's responsibility to protect
environmental resources. In the M.C. Mehta v. Union of India cases,
the Supreme Court of India recognized the duty of the state to protect
the environment as part of the public trust.
Conclusion: