Process Sythesis Tree
Process Sythesis Tree
Benzene hydrogenation is the premier method for commercial cyclohexane production due to
its efficiency and product purity. This process achieves approximately 99% conversion of
benzene to cyclohexane, ensuring minimal waste and optimal use of raw materials. The
resulting cyclohexane has a purity level exceeding 99%, essential for high-quality nylon
production. The use of effective catalysts, such as nickel or platinum, enhances reaction rates
and selectivity, further improving yield and reducing costs. Additionally, the process's
scalability and environmental benefits make it the preferred choice for industrial applications.
In case of Route 2, it is less efficient and produces a lower purity product compared to
benzene hydrogenation. The cyclohexane content in naphtha is typically very low, ranging
from 0.5% to 1.0%. Consequently, the recovery process from petroleum streams involves
complex fractionation and extraction steps. The cyclohexane obtained through this method
has a purity of approximately 85%, which is insufficient for high-quality applications like
adipic acid production used in nylon manufacturing. To achieve the necessary purity levels,
further purification processes such as isomerization and heat cracking are required, which add
to the operational costs and complexity of the process. These limitations make naphtha
fractionation a less favorable option compared to the high conversion and purity achieved
through benzene hydrogenation.
Routes 3 and 4 for cyclohexane synthesis, while used in laboratory settings, involve multiple
steps, poor yields, and low purity. They lack scalability and are not suitable for commercial
production due to these limitations. Hence, benzene hydrogenation remains the preferred
industrial method due to its high conversion rate, superior product purity, and economic
viability.
3. Economic Feasibility:
We can estimate the economic potential for the selected route using raw material costs and
current product selling price.
Since, the RM cost is less than the product selling price, we can assume for now this route is
economically feasible.
Price difference: 8.82-8.31= 0.51 Rs./gmol == 5.95 Rs./kg of cyclohexane
4. Material Balance:
The plant capacity I have decided to take is 20 KTPA (kilo tonnes per annum). The plant will
be run in continuous mode with 8000 working hours per year.
Hence,
kg/hr kmol/hr
Output
Cyclohexane 2500 29.76
Input Required
Benzene 2321.4 29.76
Hydrogen 178.6 89.29
Required amount of catalyst will be calculated based on reaction kinetics and activity.
5. Block Diagram
Feed Preparation:
• Benzene Feedstock
• Hydrogen Feedstock
Hydrogenation Reactor:
Heat Exchanger:
• The reaction mixture exits the reactor and passes through a heat exchanger to cool the
products.
Gas-Liquid Separator:
• The cooled reaction mixture enters a separator to remove unreacted hydrogen gas,
which is recycled back to the reactor.
Distillation Column:
• The liquid mixture from the separator is fed into a distillation column.
• The distillate containing cyclohexane is further purified to achieve the required purity
levels.
Storage:
6. Selection of Technology
The production of cyclohexane through benzene hydrogenation involves several critical
technological choices:
1. Catalyst Selection: Nickel is the most common catalyst for this process, known for
its cost-effectiveness and high activity, achieving over 99% conversion and producing
cyclohexane with high purity.
2. Reactor Design: Fixed-bed reactors are typically used in industry for their efficiency
in continuous operations, although alternative designs like fluidized-bed and
membrane reactors may enhance performance.
8. Equipment selection:
1. Hydrogenation Reactor:
o Type: Fixed-bed reactors are the most common choice due to their simplicity
and effectiveness in continuous processes. They can efficiently handle large
volumes of feedstock and provide good temperature control.
3. Gas-Liquid Separator:
o Considerations: Design features such as inlet devices and baffles are crucial
for minimizing gas retention and enhancing separation efficiency. The
separator must be sized appropriately to handle the expected flow rates.
4. Distillation Column:
5. Storage Tanks:
9. Process Evaluation
1. Safety Study
1. Process Hazards
o Benzene: This compound is also flammable and can contribute to fire hazards.
Precautions must be taken to prevent leaks and spills during handling.
• Toxicity:
o Benzene: As a known carcinogen, benzene can pose serious health risks upon
inhalation or skin exposure. Monitoring benzene concentrations in the
workplace and implementing appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE)
and ventilation systems is crucial.
o The process operates at high pressures (20-50 bar) and temperatures (150-
250°C). Maintaining these conditions is critical; failure can lead to equipment
failures or uncontrolled reactions.
o Safety Relief Valves: Properly functioning safety relief valves are essential to
prevent overpressure situations in reactors.
2. Reaction Hazards
• Side Reactions:
o Side reactions may occur under certain conditions, leading to the formation of
unwanted by-products that can complicate the separation and purification
processes. These by-products can introduce additional hazards and must be
carefully monitored.
2. Controllability study
1. Hydrogenation Reactor
2. Heat Exchanger
• Control Strategies: PID controllers adjust flow rates to maintain stable temperatures.
3. Gas-Liquid Separator
• Control Parameters: Key parameters include pressure, temperature, and liquid and
gas flow rates.
• Control Strategies: Level controllers and density measurements enhance separation
efficiency.
4. Distillation Column
• Control Parameters: Monitor top and bottom product compositions and temperature.
• Control Strategies: Online analyzers optimize reflux ratios and reboiler duty to
maintain product quality.
5. Storage Tanks
• Control Strategies: Level controllers and pressure relief systems ensure safe storage
conditions.
• Control Strategies: Flow meters and automated shutoff valves enhance safety in the
system.
3. Economic Evaluation.
As seen previously,
Cyclohexane price-RM cost = 5.95 Rs./kg of cyclohexane
This profit can be considerably increase if instead of buying hydrogen, we produce it in-situ
in the plant itself via SMR (Steam Methane Reforming)
This will lower the cost of hydrogen from 200 Rs./Kg to around 50 Rs./kg.