Shenly Ympas - FINAL RESEARCH PROPOSAL PAPER - GROUP PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

FINAL RESEARCH PROPOSAL PAPER- GROUP PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT

Note: The result of this performance evaluation will be used solely to give credit where credit is due. This will be primarily used in the computation of individual performance of each team
member. The scores provided here will be strictly confidential.

CRITERIA FOR SCORING

Intellectual Contribution Attitudes toward research work Total Qualitative Remarks


(scoring: 1 lowest; 10 highest) (scoring: 1 lowest; 10 highest) (Share or describe the contributions given by
each member)

A. Contributed a significant % of ideas, A. Showed enthusiasm to learn, to search and to perform


concepts or thoughts which are essential in duties assigned to him/her
the proposal formulation B. Showed humility and accept constructive criticism SCORES WILL NOT BE RECORDED IF
B. Extent of research effort performed from group members THE ROLE OF EACH MEMBER IS NOT
C. Suggest ideas and concepts which are C. Manifest exemplary perseverance and determination SPECIFIED
Name of members essential in coming up with a good
including the rater to finish assigned task
decision for the paper (STATE THE ROLE OF EACH MEMBER)
D. Volunteers to perform job not assigned to him/her
D. Provides suggestions in troubleshooting
whenever necessary (or when the original assigned
the problems encountered during the Example:
proposal and final paper write-up person cannot perform the duty)
E. Finds enough time to write the assigned E. Manifest intellectual honesty and academic integrity *She revised the Rationale (specifically the
section of the paper in a very productive at all times Local and Global Studies)
manner *He was tasked to organize the Theoretical
Framework
Item Item Item Item Item Item Item Item Item Item 100
A B C D E A B C D E
Ympas, Shenly Gen R. 9 9 8 8 10 9 10 10 9 8 90 She was assigned in creating the Rationale,
statement of the problem and significance of the
study, as well as the Research Design, Research
Environment, Research Participants, and the
Ethical Considerations

She reminds about the parts that need to be done


and revises when needed.

Catalonia, Lyka L, 6 8 6 5 7 8 8 10 7 9 74 She was tasked to formulate the Theoretical


Framework and background, Conceptual
framework, Data Gathering (Preliminary, Actual,
Post), and Data Analysis

She takes a long time to submit her parts because


she makes excuses, like saying it’s due to work.
Then, when she does submit, I have to revise a lot
of her work.

Garcia, Suzienne 7 8 8 7 9 8 8 10 7 9 81 She created the Scopes and Delimitation,


Definition of Terms, Recruitment and Sampling
Design, and Research Instrument

She gets things done quickly, but sometimes she


loses her patience if she makes mistakes in what
she is doing.

You might also like