SF 1
SF 1
RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ajay Sharma (Design) JE-II (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri Ajay Sharma is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Ajay Sharma is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri Ajay Sharma ex-parte.
Name: Y.K.Dewang
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Ajay Sharma
Design: JE-II
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri Ajay Sharma,
Design: - Junior Engineer-II of SSE/C&W/Durg
That the said Sri Ajay Sharma, while functioning as Junior Engineer-II at SSE/C&W/Durg is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
You were performing upper gear examination duty for the train no. 12549 Durg –Jammu
tawi, Exp. at Durg . During inspection of the said train at Durg on 27.03.12, the following
irregularities are found noticed by under signed.
By this Act. Sri Ajay Sharma, Design. JE-II has contravened the provision of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under
RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Satyanarayana, (Design) JE-II (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri Satyanarayana, is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Satyanarayana, is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri Satyanarayana,ex-parte.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Satyanarayana,
Design: JE-II
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri Satyanarayana,
Design: - Junior Engineer-II of SSE/C&W/Durg
That the said Sri Satyanarayana, while functioning as Junior Engineer-II at SSE/C&W/Durg is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
You have supervised upper gear maintenance of train No.12823 on 02.04.12 during
inspection of the said train by DME/R it was noticed that liquid soap disperser was deficient in
two foils of coach No. SEC 06108 WGACCN.
This shows that gross negligence on your part.
By this Act. Sri Satyanarayana, Design. JE-II has contravened the provision of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under
RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord. & Project)
S.E.C. Railway, Raipur.
NO: M/D&A/Sr.DME(R)/ LS /DBG/LP(G)/CC/Loco/BIA Date: 14.04.2012
2. Sri D.B.Ganguly is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri D.B.Ganguly is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri D.B.Ganguly ex-parte.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri D.B.Ganguly
Design: LP (Goods)
Office: - CC/Loco/BIA
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri D.B.Ganguly
Design: LP (Goods) of CC/Loco/BIA.
That the said Sri D.B.Ganguly while functioning as LP at CC/Loco/BIA is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
On 30.03.12, while you were working in T.O. 01:45 hrs. with couple light engine (accompanied
with an ALP), after arrival at DLS/R after completion of 06:35 hrs. duty, you were advice to take
charge of GM Loco but you refused to do so. Further you were advice to stay at RSD Running
room to take rest and after that work toward your HQ/BIA, but you had left the Running room
without any information and permission of DPC/R, and returned to your HQ/BIA
This shows that gross negligence on your part.
By this Act, Sri D.B.Ganguly Design LP (Goods) has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS
(D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord. & Project)
S.E.C. Railway, Raipur.
NO: M/D&A/SF-11/LS/DM/LM/LPS/Loco/R Date 18.05.12
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Liladhar Mandavi (Design) ) Loco Pilot Shunter (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/R is
hereby informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against
him under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri Liladhar Mandavi is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Liladhar Mandavi is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2,
it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Sri Liladhar Mandavi ex-parte.
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Liladhar Mandavi
Design: Loco Pilot (Shunter)
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Liladhar
Mandavi, Design: - LP(S) of CC/Loco/R.
That the said Sri Liladhar Mandavi, while functioning as LPS at CC/Loco/R is alleged to
have committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of RA-115 bay line no. 01 of Raipur station on dated 03.05.2012 at about 14:20 Hrs..
On date 03.05.2012 during your duty while Shunting Loco No. 36057 WDS 6/R with diesel MU No.
16329, 16090 & LE No. 16315 & 16246 coming to bay line no. 01 from bay line no 01 for coupling of
Diesel Loco No. 16464 & VPU SR 99850 & detaching of Loco no. 16246 to work with 18209. The rear
most wheel set of RA-115 got derailed due to pushing force with four dead loco without brake
continuity accumulated and resultant force facilitate wheel mounting over safety chain and got derails.
By doing this Act. Sri Liladhar Mandavi, Design. LPS has contravened the provision of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under
RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident/ 8/bay line
Raipur/8817 Date 04.05.2012
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord. & Project)
S.E.C. Railway, Raipur.
NO: M/D&A/SF-11/LS/DM/VRR/LP(G)/Loco/R Date 15.06.12
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri V.R.Ravi (Design) ) LP(G) (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/R is hereby informed, that the
President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri V.R.Ravi (Design) LP(G) is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri V.R.Ravi (Design) ) LP(G) is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri V.R.Ravi (Design) ) LP(G) ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri V.R.Ravi (Design) LP(G).
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri V.R.Ravi (Design) LP(G)
Design: Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri V.R.Ravi
Design: - LP(G) at CC/Loco/R.
That the said Sri V.R.Ravi, while functioning as LP(G) at CC/Loco/R is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
While working and executing shunting performance for movement of loco no 36058 WDS6 from goods
shed to GSD line after placement at goods shed, loco proceed towards GSD and got derailed over D/S
point no. 55B at 9:45 hrs. as you failed to control the locomotive within jurisdiction of movement and
proceed beyond open DS point no.55B at RSD.on dt 04.06.12.
By doing this Act. Sri V.R.Ravi, Design. Sr. ALP at CC/Loco/BIA has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident/
8/RSD/8188 Date 05.06.2012
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ajay Sharma (Design) JE-II (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri Ajay Sharma is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Ajay Sharma is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri Ajay Sharma ex-parte.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Ajay Sharma
Design: JE-II
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri Ajay Sharma,
Design: - Junior Engineer-II of SSE/C&W/Durg
That the said Sri Ajay Sharma, while functioning as Junior Engineer-II at SSE/C&W/Durg is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
By this Act. Sri Ajay Sharma, Design. JE-II has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii)
of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS (D&A)
rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Copy to:- 1.Sr.DME (Safety Sec.) For information please.
2 .Sr.DME(Coaching) DLI for information inference to your letter
No. 120 TRS/ 10/D/2012/MII
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Smt. Sunila Masih (Design) Helper-II (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Raipur is hereby
informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him
under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Smt. Sunila Masih is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Smt. Sunila Masih is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Smt. Sunila Masih, ex-parte.
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Smt. Sunila Masih
Design: - Helper-II
Office: - SSE/C&W/Raipur.
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Smt. Sunila
Masih, Design: Helper-II of SSE/C&W/Raipur.
That the said Smt. Sunila Masih, while functioning as Helper-II at SSE/C&W/Raipur is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
Smt. Sunila Masih, Design. Sr. Masalchi under SSE/C&W/Raipur, was Un Authorized
absent from duty since 14.05.12 to 12.06.12 without any intimation and submitted PMC unfit and
fit certificate at a time as reported by SSE/C&W/Raipur, vide his letter NO.NIL, Dt. 12.06.12.
By this Act. Smt. Sunila Masih, Design. Helper-II has contravened the provision of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under
RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri D.Ravi Kumar (Design) Junior Engineer (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/DURG is
hereby informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against
him under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri D.Ravi Kumar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri D.Ravi Kumar is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri D.Ravi Kumar ex-prate.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri D.Ravi Kumar (By order and in
the name of the President).
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri D.Ravi Kumar
Design: Junior Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri D.Ravi
Kumar, Design: - Junior Engineer of SSE/C&W/DURG
That the said Sri D.Ravi Kumar, while functioning as Junior Engineer at SSE/C&W/DURG
is alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
Coach No. SEC 8173 WGSCN was examined by you on 26.06.12 and attached with the
Train No. on date 27.06.12 on party booking coach. A complain receive by Rawalmal Jain
(who has booked this coach) for following irregularity.
1. Very poor cleaning of entire coach especially all four lavatory were not clean.
2. Water pipe line leak in western style lavatory.
3. No support in berth no. 20, 21 and 22 hence hanging.
4. Emergency window was not being closed.
By doing so you held responsible in this case. This is a great negligence from your part
of duty.
By this Act Sri D.Ravi Kumar, Design. Junior Engineer has contravened the provision of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action
under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe (Design) Section Engineer (Office in which working) C&W/DRZ is
hereby informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against
him under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned
(through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para
– 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Sri Nilesh Ninawe, ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe.
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe
Design: - Section Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/DRZ.
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri
Nilesh Kumar Ninawe, Design: - Section Engineer of C&W/DRZ.
.
That the said Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe, while functioning as Section Engineer at C&W/DRZ
is alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe, Design. Section Engineer under SSE/C&W/DRZ, was
Un Authorized absent from duty since 23.05.12 to 01.06.12 and onward without any intimation to
his Sr Supervisor as reported by SSE/C&W/DRZ, vide his letter NO.03/UA/NK/JE/C/DRZ, Dt.
01.06.12.
By the above Act of omission and commission, Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe, Section Engineer
under SSE/C&W/DRZ has failed to maintain the absolute integrity and acted in a manner unbecoming
a Rly. Servant thereby contravening Rule No. – 3.1 (ii) & (iii) by railway service (conducted) Rules
rendered himself liable to be taken up under Railway servant (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time
to time.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Fagu Ram Sahu (Design) JE-II (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby
informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him
under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri Fagu Ram Sahu is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Fagu Ram Sahu is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri Fagu Ram Sahu ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Fagu Ram Sahu,
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Fagu Ram Sahu
Design: JE-II
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri Fagu Ram Sahu,
Design: - Junior Engineer-II of SSE/C&W/Durg
That the said Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, while functioning as Junior Engineer-II at SSE/C&W/Durg is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 06.08.12 train no. 18207 Exp. Durg –Ajmer detained between BQR and BPHB
from 16:20 hrs. to 16:30 hrs. and KMI from 16:40 hrs. to 17:00 hrs. due to brake binding of coach
nos. SEC 9056 front SLR (Hand Brake closed), SEC 938056 AC II Tire and SEC 04101 ACCN,
resulting train lost 30 minutes punctuality in division. The above brake binding released by crew
and guard. Since you were issued BPC without ensuring regarding full train releasing and also
hand brake of front SLR was allowed in jammed condition. Hence you held responsible in this
case.
This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By this Act. Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, Design. JE-II has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS
(D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri A.K.Josi (Design) Tech-II (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed, that
the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri Sri A.K.Josi is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through proper
channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri A.K.Josi is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will be
presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri
A.K.Josi ex-parte.
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri A.K.Josi
Design: Tech-II
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri A.K.Josi, Design: -
Tech-II of SSE/C&W/Durg
That the said Sri A.K.Josi, while functioning as Tech-II at SSE/C&W/Durg is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 06.08.12 train no. 18207 Exp. Durg –Ajmer detained between BQR and BPHB
from 16:20 hrs. to 16:30 hrs. and KMI from 16:40 hrs. to 17:00 hrs. due to brake binding of coach
nos. SEC 9056 front SLR (Hand Brake closed), SEC 938056 AC II Tire and SEC 04101 ACCN .
The above brake binding released by crew and guard, resulted train loss 30 minute in division
punctuality. You have failed to release full train properly also failed to check the hand brake of
front SLR which was in jammed condition. You held responsible in this case.
This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By this Act. Sri A.K.Josi, Design. Tech-II has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of
R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS (D&A)
rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri S.K.Tiwari (Design) Tech-II (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri S.K.Tiwari is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through proper
channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri S.K.Tiwari is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri
S.K.Tiwari ex-parte.
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri S.K.Tiwari
Design: Tech-II
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri S.K.Tiwari, Design:
- Tech-II of SSE/C&W/Durg
That the said Sri S.K.Tiwari, while functioning as Tech-II at SSE/C&W/Durg is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 06.08.12 train no. 18207 Exp. Durg –Ajmer detained between BQR and BPHB
from 16:20 hrs. to 16:30 hrs. and KMI from 16:40 hrs. to 17:00 hrs. due to brake binding of coach
nos. SEC 9056 front SLR (Hand Brake closed) , SEC 938056 AC II Tire and SEC 04101 ACCN .
The above brake binding released by crew and guard, resulted train loss 30 minute in division
punctuality. You have failed to release full train properly also failed to check the hand brake of
front SLR which was in jammed condition. You held responsible in this case.
This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By this Act. Sri S.K.Tiwari, Design. Tech-II has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii)
of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS (D&A)
rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: MR.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri K.Jagannath Rao is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Sri K.Jagannath Rao is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para –
2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Sri K.Jagannath Rao ex-parte.
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri K.Jagannath Rao
Design: Tech-I
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri K.Jagannath Rao,
Design: - Tech-I of SSE/C&W/Durg
That the said Sri K.Jagannath Rao, while functioning as Tech-I at SSE/C&W/Durg is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 06.08.12 train no. 18207 Exp. Durg –Ajmer detained between BQR and BPHB
from 16:20 hrs. to 16:30 hrs. and KMI from 16:40 hrs. to 17:00 hrs. due to brake binding of coach
nos. SEC 9056 front SLR (Hand Brake closed) ,SEC 938056 AC II Tire and SEC 04101 ACCN .
The above brake binding released by crew and guard, resulted train loss 30 minute in division
punctuality. You have failed to release full train properly also failed to check the hand brake of
front SLR which was in jammed condition. You held responsible in this case.
This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By this Act. Sri K.Jagannath Rao, Design. Tech-I has contravened the provision of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under
RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: MR.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri A.K.Panda (Design) JE-II (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Raipur is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri A.K.Panda is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through proper
channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri A.K.Panda is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri
A.K.Panda, ex-parte.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri A.K.Panda
Design: - Jr.Engineer-II
Office: - SSE/C&W/Raipur.
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri
A.K.Panda, Design: JE-II of SSE/C&W/Raipur.
That the said Sri A.K.Panda, while functioning as JE-II at SSE/C&W/Raipur is alleged to
have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 05.08.12 GS coach no.NER 10580 of train no 15159 exp. detached at G/cabin BMY
due to hot axle after reporting by Sri Gopal Indulkar Rao,GK/Traffic/KMI of LC no.430,during
passing the train Gate keeper observed hot axle. You were failed to check the Rolling in
examination at Raipur during your duty.
By this Act. Sri A.K.Panda, Design. JE-II has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of
R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS (D&A)
rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident/
R/8/1/8357 Date 16.08.2012
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
Sri Sk Azimul Haque (Design) Tech.-I (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Raipur is hereby
informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him
under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as
mentioned above, is shown in the over leaf.
Sri Sk Azimul Haque is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned
(through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
If Sri Sk Azimul Haque is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2,
it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Sri Sk Azimul Haque, ex-parte.
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Sk Azimul Haque
Design: - Tech.-I
Office: - SSE/C&W/Raipur.
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Sk Azimul
Haque, Design: Tech. –I of SSE/C&W/Raipur.
That the said Sri Sk Azimul Haque, while functioning as Tech.-I at SSE/C&W/Raipur is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 05.08.12 GS coach no.NER 10580 of train no 15159 exp. detached at G/cabin BMY
due to hot axle after reporting by Sri Gopal Indulkar Rao,GK/Traffic/KMI of LC no.430,during
passing the train Gate keeper observed hot axle. You were failed to check the Rolling in
examination at Raipur during your duty.
By this Act. Sri Sk Azimul Haque, Design. Tech.-I has contravened the provision of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under
RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident/
R/8/1/8357 Date 16.08.2012
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri N K Rao is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri N K Rao is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri N K Rao, ex-parte.
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri N K Rao
Design: - Tech.-II
Office: - SSE/C&W/Raipur.
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri N K Rao,
Design: Tech.-II of SSE/C&W/Raipur.
That the said Sri N K Rao, while functioning as Tech.-II at SSE/C&W/Raipur is alleged to
have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 05.08.12 GS coach no.NER 10580 of train no 15159 exp. detached at G/cabin BMY
due to hot axle after reporting by Sri Gopal Indulkar Rao,GK/Traffic/KMI of LC no.430,during
passing the train Gate keeper observed hot axle. You were failed to check the Rolling in
examination at Raipur during your duty.
By this Act. Sri N K Rao, Design. Tech.-II has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of
R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS (D&A)
rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.R.Yadav
Design: DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident/
R/8/1/8357 Date 16.08.2012
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord. & Project)
S.E.C. Railway, Raipur.
NO: M/D&A/SF-11/LS/DM/AVR/LP/Loco/BMY Date 13.09.12
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri A.Venkat Rao (Design) ) LP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BMY is hereby informed, that
the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri A.Venkat Rao (Design) LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri A.Venkat Rao (Design) ) LP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri A.Venkat Rao (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri A.Venkat Rao (Design) LP.
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri A.Venkat Rao,
Design: Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/BMY
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri A.Venkat
Rao Design: - LP at CC/Loco/BMY.
That the said Sri A.Venkat Rao, while functioning as LP at CC/Loco/BMY is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of BOXNM1/E Wagon no. SC 69778 at line no-7 at RSD yard on dt. 28.08.12 at
about 02:20 hrs.
The train no off POH /NBOX/E was stabled at line no-7 with shut down diesel powers no 13587
WDG3A at 01:20 hrs. air pressure continuity given and made ready at 02:00 hrs. Signal given at 02:10
hrs. at about 02:20 hrs. just after start 1 st wagon from engine SC 69778 BOXN/E leading trolley leading
one pair wheel set got derailed Due to entangle of skid in joint as skid was not remove before starting of
train.
This shows that gross negligence on your part.
By doing this Act. Sri A.Venkat Rao, Design LP at CC/Loco/BMY has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accidentcase/
RSD/8/8354 Date 30.08.2012
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Sunil Kumar (Design) ) LP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/R is hereby informed, that the
President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri Sunil Kumar (Design) ) LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Sunil Kumar (Design) ) LP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Sunil Kumar (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri Sunil Kumar (Design) ) LP.
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Sunil Kumar,
Design: Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Sunil Kumar
(Design) ) LP at CC/Loco/R.
That the said Sri Sunil Kumar, while functioning as LP at CC/Loco/R is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of 04 Wagons at SKS Siding /RSD at line no-1 on dt. 06.10.12 at about 20:30 hrs.
The train no N/MDH with multi diesel engine no 13066/13047 WDG3A arrived at RSD line no-7
on 06.10.12 at 00:20 hrs. The engine was shut down at 00:45 hrs. at about 20:00 hrs. program was
given by yard master to detach the multi diesel loco to clear BCN/BLGR. After detaching the loco at
20:30 hrs. rake started rolling down and proceeded towards SKS siding line no 01. After breaching the
dead end of line no 01 of SKS siding rear most 04 wagons derailed and out of which 03 wagons
capsized completely. The above accident occurred as you failed to ensure the pressure in stable loco
before detaching the loco.
By doing this Act. Sri Sunil Kumar (Design) ) LP at CC/Loco/R has contravened the provision
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary
action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident
case//8/2437 Date 11.10.2012
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Mukesh Kumar Meshram (Design) ) LP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BIA is hereby
informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him
under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri Mukesh Kumar Meshram (Design) ) LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be
submitted to undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten
days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Mukesh Kumar Meshram (Design) ) LP is fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be
liable to be passed against Sri Mukesh Kumar Meshram (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
5. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri Mukesh Kumar Meshram
(Design) LP.(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Mukesh Kumar Meshram,
Design: Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/BIA
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Mukesh
Kumar Meshram (Design) ) LP at CC/Loco/BIA.
That the said Sri Mukesh Kumar Meshram, while functioning as LP at CC/Loco/BIA is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of shunting power no 36059 WDS6/R at PP yard on dt. 15.11.12 at about 10:20 hrs.
On date 15.11.12 28 NBOXE with 01 BVZC from sick line was programmed to shunt to pit line
via shunting neck no 01 was given to you, in this process the Loco with 28 NBOX/E+1 BVZC proceed
to shunting neck no. 01 and owing to the excess drawing of the train, the power breach the dead end and
‘R’ends front trolley of loco got derailed. Due to you have failed to judgment the dead end and also
failed to control the loco.
This shows that gross negligence on your part.
By doing this Act. Sri Mukesh Kumar Meshram (Design) ) LP at CC/Loco/BIA has
contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self
liable for disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident
case//8/8499 Date 19.11.2012
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri A.K.Lonkar (Design) ) LP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/R is hereby informed, that the
President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
3. If Sri A.K.Lonkar (Design) ) LP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri A.K.Lonkar (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri A.K.Lonkar (Design) ) LP.
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri A.K.Lonkar,
Design: Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri A.K.Lonkar
(Design) ) LP at CC/Loco/R.
That the said Sri A.K.Lonkar, while functioning as LP at CC/Loco/R is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 15.10.12 you have booked to work train no. TPSK/BTAP with loco no.12401, TO 20:30
hrs. from shed (DLS/R) You have taken over charge at fueling point /DLS/R. After attaching fueling
hose pipe, loco roll down resulted the fueling hose pipe has broken.
By doing this Act. Sri A.K.Lonkar (Design) ) LP at CC/Loco/R has contravened the provision
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary
action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri M.K.Chakraborty (Design) ) LP(G) (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
3. If Sri M.K.Chakraborty (Design) ) LP(G) is fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be
liable to be passed against Sri M.K.Chakraborty (Design) ) LP(G) ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri M.K.Chakraborty (Design) ) LP(G).
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri M.K.Chakraborty ,
Design: Loco Pilot (G)
Office: - CC/Loco/BIA
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri
M.K.Chakraborty (Design) ) LP(G) at CC/Loco/BIA.
Bursting of point no.84 of by pass sick line no.05 near Down Reception yard BMY on 25.11.12 at about
05hrs.
On date 25.11.2012 at about 05:00 hrs while Engine no. 36176 WDS 6/R was pushing 15 wagons
from by pass sick line no.05 to hump yard BMY the point no 84 owing to set on trailing direction got
busted at the time wagon negotiated the said point no.84.
You failed to observe the shunt signal no.28 in near end setting of point resulting the point got
busted. This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By doing this Act. Sri M.K.Chakraborty (Design) LP (G) at CC/Loco/BIA has contravened
the provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident case/ E-
cabin/8/8519/8521 Date 30.11.2012
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri N.V.Satyanarayana is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri N.V.Satyanarayana is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para –
2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Sri N.V.Satyanarayana ex-parte.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri N.V.Satyanarayana
Design: JE
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri N.V.Satyanarayana,
Design: - Junior Engineer- of SSE/C&W/Durg
That the said Sri N.V.Satyanarayana, while functioning as Junior Engineer at SSE/C&W/Durg is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
“On 05.12.12 during your duty you have examined the train no 18237 DUG-DNR Exp. at
washing line no.1 (without pit) at coaching depot durg and visually checked under gear parts ,DV
isolating handle ,trolley isolating cocks. You also supervised checking of operation and release of
brakes of all the coaches during air pressure continuity test in washing line. During joint checking
at ROU isolating cocks of trolleys of 10 coaches and DV of one coach were found isolated. As it is
difficult to assume that these isolations could have been done en-route, you have made failed to
check properly during examination at durg coaching depot resulting the said train detain in
various division due to poor brake power”
By this Act. Sri N.V.Satyanarayana, Design. JE- has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS
(D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Copy to-1. Dy.CME (Chg)/HQ for information please in connection of your letter No. 2012/109/007/012/7357
Date 17/18.12.2012
2. Sr.DME/R (Safety section) for information please
Desig
________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord.)
MEMORANDUM
1- Jh izse pan ¼inuke½ yksdks ik;yV ¼dk;kZy; ftuesa dke djrs gks ½ dzw
daVªksyj@yksdks@jk;iqj dks ,rn~ }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd jk’Vªifr@jsyos
cksMZ@fuEugLrk{kjh muds fo#) jsy deZpkjh ¼vuq”kklu vkSj vihy½ fu;e] 1968
ds fu;e 11 ds varxZr dk;Zokgh djus dk izLrko djrk gS@dkjrs gSa A nqO;Zogkj ;k
vopkj ds ykaNuksa dk ,d fooj.k layXu gS] ftl ij mi;qZDr dkjZokbZ dk izLrko gS A
1. Sri Prem Chand (Design) ) LP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/R is hereby informed, that the
President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2- Jh izse pan dks ,rn~ }kjk ;g volj fn;k tkrk gS fd bl izLrko ds fo#) o tks Hkh
vH;kosnu nsuk pkgs] nsa A vH;kosnu ;fn nsuk gks] fuEugLrk{kjh dks ¼ }kjk
dzw daVªksyj@yksdks@jk;iqj ½ jsyos ds egkizcU/kd ds ek/;e ls] ftlls mDr
egkizcU/kd ds ikl igq¡p lds½ bl Kkiu dh izkfIr ds nl fnu ds Hkhrj izLrqr fd;k tk, A
2. Sri Prem Chand (Design) ) LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3- ;fn Jh izse pan iSjk 2 esa fofufnZ’V vof/k ds Hkhrj vH;kosnu izLrqr ugha djrs rks
;g eku fy;k tk;sxk fd mUgsa dksbZ
vH;kosnu ugha nsuk gS vkSj Jh izse pan ds fo#) ,d i{kh; vkns”k ikfjr fd;s tk
ldsaxs A
3. If Sri Prem Chand (Design) ) LP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Prem Chand (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Prem Chand,
Design: Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
vfHk;ksx dk fooj.k ftlds vk/kkj ij Jh izse pan inuke yksdks ik;yV @ dzw
daVªksyj@yksdks@jk;iqj ds fo#) vuq”kklfud dkjZokbZ fd;k tkuk gS A
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Prem Chand
(Design) LP at CC/Loco/R.
fnukad 28-12-12 dks vkidh fM;qVh 06%00 cts ls 14%00 cts rd iaqfyx
laVj dk;Z gsrqq Mh ,y ,l jk;iqj esa yxkbZ xbZ Fkh A vkius bztu dz-
11145@13622 dk izHkkj 7%00 cts fy;k ,oa xkkMh dzekad ch vks ,l Vh
@ds ih ,y esa 8%50 cts bZ vks Vh fd;k] mDr xkMh esa dk;Z djus okyk
pkyd Jh eka÷kh¼fVVykx<½ }kjk Mh ih lh@jk;iqj dks lwpuk nh xbZ dh
batu dz- 13622 esa yqc vkbZy djhc 600 yhVj de gS] ftls vki Loa; us Hkh
t¡kp fd;k FkkA
mDr batu dk izHkkj ysus ds mijkar batu dz- 13622 esa yqc vkbZy
djhc 600 yhVj de gksus dh lwpuk vkids }kjk Mh ih lh@jk;iqj dks ugha nh
xbZ ftlds dkj.k mDr xkMh dks Mh ih lh@jk;iqj }kjk Vh vkj djuk iMk ftlds
fy, vki iw.kZ ftEesnkj gSA
On date 28.12.12 you have booked for pulling shunter duty from 06:00 to 14:00 hrs. You have
taken over charge at DLS/R of Loco no 11145/ 13622 at 07:00. EOT on train no. BOST/ KPL at 8:50
hrs. O/G LP of TIG Shri Manjhi reported 600 lts below lube oil in Loco no.13622; the same is checked
by you and found actual 600 lts below lube oil. You have failed to inform the same to DPC/R, Resulting
the said train marked TR at 10:30 hrs.
This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
vius mijksDr d`R; ls] vkius crkSj ,d jsy lsod] js-ls- vkpj.k fu;e 1966
ds 3-1 (ii) (iii) dk mYya?ku fd;k gS A vr% le;≤ ij la”kksf/kr
vuq”kklu ,oa vihy fu;e 1968 ds varxZr dkjZokbZ fd, tkus ds fy, vki
mRrjnk;h gSa A
By doing this Act. Sri Prem Chand (Design) ) LP at CC/Loco/R has contravened the provision
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary
action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma (Design) JE (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby
informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him
under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2 Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para
– 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma (By order
and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma
Design: JE
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri Ajay Kumar
Sharma, Design: - JE of SSE/C&W/DURG
That the said Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma, while functioning as JE at SSE/C&W/DURG is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date train no.16327 KRBA-TVC Exp arrived durg at 0:30 hrs VPH/LD no. CR 00840
attached at 0:50 hrs and EOT at 01:00 hrs found buffer height low at about 975 mm and difference
between Eng. and VPH 140 mm, so memo given for detachment at 01:05 hrs. VPH detached at 01:15
hrs and R/EOT at 01:25 hrs. You have failed to check properly under gear examination including buffer
height at pit line of above VPH, resulting detention occured in C&W account.
By this Act Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma, Design. JE has contravened the provision of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under
RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
___________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. what exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord.)
MEMORANDUM
1- Jh JhdkUr jtd ¼inuke½ yksdks ik;yV ¼dk;kZy; ftuesa dke djrs gks ½ dzw
daVªksyj@yksdks@fHkykbZ dks ,rn~ }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd jk’Vªifr@jsyos
cksMZ@fuEugLrk{kjh muds fo#) jsy deZpkjh ¼vuq”kklu vkSj vihy½ fu;e] 1968
ds fu;e 11 ds varxZr dk;Zokgh djus dk izLrko djrk gS@dkjrs gSa A nqO;Zogkj ;k
vopkj ds ykaNuksa dk ,d fooj.k layXu gS] ftl ij mi;qZDr dkjZokbZ dk izLrko gS A
1. Sri Srikant Rajak (Design) ) LP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed, that
the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2- Jh JhdkUr jtd dks ,rn~ }kjk ;g volj fn;k tkrk gS fd bl izLrko ds fo#) o tks Hkh
vH;kosnu nsuk pkgs] nsa A vH;kosnu ;fn nsuk gks] fuEugLrk{kjh dks ¼ }kjk
dzw daVªksyj@yksdks@jk;iqj ½ jsyos ds egkizcU/kd ds ek/;e ls] ftlls mDr
egkizcU/kd ds ikl igq¡p lds½ bl Kkiu dh izkfIr ds nl fnu ds Hkhrj izLrqr fd;k tk, A
2. Sri Srikant Rajak (Design) ) LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3- ;fn Jh JhdkUr jtd iSjk 2 esa fofufnZ’V vof/k ds Hkhrj vH;kosnu izLrqr ugha djrs
rks ;g eku fy;k tk;sxk fd mUgsa
dksbZ vH;kosnu ugha nsuk gS vkSj Jh JhdkUr jtd ds fo#) ,d i{kh; vkns”k ikfjr
fd;s tk ldsaxs A
3. If Sri Srikant Rajak (Design) ) LP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Srikant Rajak (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Srikant Rajak,
Design: Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/BIA
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
vfHk;ksx dk fooj.k ftlds vk/kkj ij Jh JhdkUr jtd inuke yksdks ik;yV @ dzw
daVªksyj@yksdks@fHkykbZ ds fo#) vuq”kklfud dkjZokbZ fd;k tkuk gS A
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Srikant
Rajak (Design) LP at CC/Loco/BIA.
djhc 2%25 cts vkidks crk;k x;k Fkk] dh xkMh dz- Fd/ZPS/VNCW ls
yksdks dz- 12644 dks vyx djds Mh ,y ,l ds ykbZu dz- 2 esa lVMkÅu djus
ds mijkar LVcy djuk gS] ,oa 4%15 cts vkius mDr yksdks dks lVMkÅu
djds fu;ekuqlkj LVcy djus dk jhekdZ yksdks ds ykx cqd esa ntZ dj fn;k]
fdUrq vkius mDr yksdks dks fu;ekuqlkj lqj{kkRed ¼yksdks ds gsUM
czsd ,oa ÅMu osm~t dks yksdks ds pDds esa “kk;n Bhd ls ugha yxk;k½
rjhds ls LVcy ugha fd;k ftlds QyLo#i yksdks dz- 12644 Mh ,y ,l ds ykbu
dz- 2 esa djhc 7%20 cts jksy MkÅu gqvk] ftlds fy, vki iw.kZ ftEesnkj
gSA
On date 19.01.13 roll down of shut down Loco no.12644 from DLS line no. 2 towards DLS
shunting neck after bursting hand point no.DLS/Y-36 in reverse condition damaging safety clamp and
motors point no. 43 normal condition at 7:20 hrs. as per data loger.
At 2:25 hrs you were advised to detach the said loco from train no. Fd/ZPS/VNCW and shut
down at DLS line no.-2, at 4:15 hrs. loco made shut down by you with proper stabling remark in Log
Book, with Appling hand brake and two wooden wedges. But you have failed to proper securing of loco
Hand Brake, and wooden wedges (may be not properly fixed with Loco wheels) resulting roll down the
said loco at 7:25 hrs.
This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
vius mijksDr d`R; ls] vkius crkSj ,d jsy lsod] js-ls- vkpj.k fu;e 1966
ds 3-1 (ii) (iii) dk mYya?ku fd;k gS A vr% le;≤ ij la”kksf/kr
vuq”kklu ,oa vihy fu;e 1968 ds varxZr dkjZokbZ fd, tkus ds fy, vki
mRrjnk;h gSa A
By doing this Act. Sri Srikant Rajak (Design) ) LP at CC/Loco/BIA has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident
case/DLS/8/8603 Date 22.01.13
2. Sr.DME/R (Safety section) for information please.
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord.)
MEMORANDUM
1 Jh ds lh uheZydj ¼inuke½ l- yksdks ik;yV ¼dk;kZy; ftuesa dke djrs gks ½
dzw daVªksyj@yksdks@fHkykbZ dks ,rn~ }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd
jk’Vªifr@jsyos cksMZ@fuEugLrk{kjh muds fo#) jsy deZpkjh ¼vuq”kklu vkSj
vihy½ fu;e] 1968 ds fu;e 11 ds varxZr dk;Zokgh djus dk izLrko djrk gS@dkjrs
gSa A nqO;Zogkj ;k vopkj ds ykaNuksa dk ,d fooj.k layXu gS] ftl ij mi;qZDr
dkjZokbZ dk izLrko gS A
1. Sri K C Nirmalker (Design) ) ALP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2- Jh ds lh uheZydj dks ,rn~ }kjk ;g volj fn;k tkrk gS fd bl izLrko ds fo#) o tks
Hkh vH;kosnu nsuk pkgs] nsa A vH;kosnu ;fn nsuk gks] fuEugLrk{kjh dks ¼}kjk
dzw daVªksyj@yksdks@jk;iqj ½ jsyos ds egkizcU/kd ds ek/;e ls] ftlls mDr
egkizcU/kd ds ikl igq¡p lds½ bl Kkiu dh izkfIr ds nl fnu ds Hkhrj izLrqr fd;k tk, A
2. Sri K C Nirmalker (Design) )A LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as
he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3- ;fn Jh ds lh uheZydj iSjk 2 esa fofufnZ’V vof/k ds Hkhrj vH;kosnu izLrqr ugha
djrs rks ;g eku fy;k tk;sxk fd mUgsa
dksbZ vH;kosnu ugha nsuk gS vkSj Jh ds lh uheZydj ds fo#) ,d i{kh; vkns”k
ikfjr fd;s tk ldsaxs A
3. If Sri K C Nirmalker (Design) ) ALP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri K C Nirmalker (Design) ) ALP ex-parte.
Name: S.K.Verma
Design: A DME-II/BIA
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri K C Nirmalker,
Design: Asst. Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/BIA
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
djhc 2%25 cts vkidks crk;k x;k Fkk] dh xkMh dz- Fd/ZPS/VNCW ls
yksdks dz- 12644 dks vyx djds Mh ,y ,l ds ykbZu dz- 2 esa lVMkÅu djus
ds mijkar LVcy djuk gS] ,oa 4%15 cts vkius mDr yksdks dks lVMkÅu
djds fu;ekuqlkj LVcy djus dk jhekdZ yksdks ds ykx cqd esa ntZ dj fn;k]
fdUrq vkius mDr yksdks dks fu;ekuqlkj lqj{kkRed ¼yksdks ds gsUM
czsd ,oa ÅMu osm~t dks yksdks ds pDds esa “kk;n Bhd ls ugha yxk;k½
rjhds ls LVcy ugha fd;k ftlds QyLo#i yksdks dz- 12644 Mh ,y ,l ds ykbu
dz- 2 esa djhc 7%20 cts jksy MkÅu gqvk] ftlds fy, vki iw.kZ ftEesnkj
gSA
On date 19.01.13 roll down of shut down Loco no.12644 from DLS line no. 2 towards DLS
shunting neck after bursting hand point no.DLS/Y-36 in reverse condition damaging safety clamp and
motors point no. 43 normal condition at 7:20 hrs. as per data loger.
At 2:25 hrs you were advised to detach the said loco from train no. Fd/ZPS/VNCW and shut
down at DLS line no.-2, at 4:15 hrs. loco made shut down by you with proper stabling remark in Log
Book, with Appling hand brake and two wooden wedges. But you have failed to proper securing of loco
Hand Brake, and wooden wedges (may be not properly fixed with Loco wheels) resulting roll down the
said loco at 7:25 hrs.
Name: S.K.Verma
Design: A DME-II/BIA
(Disciplinary authority)
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident
case/DLS/8/8603 Date 22.01.13
2. Sr.DME/R (Safety section) for information please.
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord.)
MEMORANDUM
1 Jh jathr flg ¼inuke½ yksdks ik;yV ¼dk;kZy; ftuesa dke djrs gks ½ dzw
daVªksyj@yksdks@fHkykbZ dks ,rn~ }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd jk’Vªifr@jsyos
cksMZ@fuEugLrk{kjh muds fo#) jsy deZpkjh ¼vuq”kklu vkSj vihy½ fu;e] 1968
ds fu;e 11 ds varxZr dk;Zokgh djus dk izLrko djrk gS@dkjrs gSa A nqO;Zogkj ;k
vopkj ds ykaNuksa dk ,d fooj.k layXu gS] ftl ij mi;qZDr dkjZokbZ dk izLrko gS A
1. Sri Ranjeet Singh (Design) ) LP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed, that
the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2- Jh jathr flg dks ,rn~ }kjk ;g volj fn;k tkrk gS fd bl izLrko ds fo#) o tks Hkh
vH;kosnu nsuk pkgs] nsa A vH;kosnu ;fn nsuk gks] fuEugLrk{kjh dks ¼}kjk
dzw daVªksyj@yksdks@fHkykbZ ½ jsyos ds egkizcU/kd ds ek/;e ls] ftlls mDr
egkizcU/kd ds ikl igq¡p lds½ bl Kkiu dh izkfIr ds nl fnu ds Hkhrj izLrqr fd;k tk, A
2. Sri Ranjeet Singh (Design) ) LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3- ;fn Jh jathr flg iSjk 2 esa fofufnZ’V vof/k ds Hkhrj vH;kosnu izLrqr ugha djrs
rks ;g eku fy;k tk;sxk fd mUgsa
dksbZ vH;kosnu ugha nsuk gS vkSj Jh jathr flg ds fo#) ,d i{kh; vkns”k ikfjr fd;s
tk ldsaxs A
3. If Sri Ranjeet Singh (Design) ) LP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Ranjeet Singh (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
)
To,
Name: - Sri Ranjeet Singh,
Design: Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/BIA
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
vfHk;ksx dk fooj.k ftlds vk/kkj ij Jh jathr flg inuke yksdks ik;yV @ dzw
daVªksyj@yksdks@fHkykbZ ds fo#) vuq”kklfud dkjZokbZ fd;k tkuk gS A
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Ranjeet
Singh (Design) LP at CC/Loco/BIA.
On date 29.01.13 T.O. given to you 18:15 hrs at BMY pilot by 18029 to TLD,charge taken
over TLD at 22:15hrs LE with Loco no. 13575 to HN and attach one coach no. 758948 SEC fit for 40
Kmph by C&W to BSP, But you refused to work due to brake piston not working. In this regard LI Shri
Shyam Rao also advised and PC order No. 12 given by on duty DPC/R, but you finally refused to do the
said work, resulting the coach detained badly at HN. It reflects clear-cut laxity on your part of duty.”
vius mijksDr d`R; ls] vkius crkSj ,d jsy lsod] js-ls- vkpj.k fu;e 1966
ds 3-1 (ii) (iii) dk mYya?ku fd;k gS A vr% le;≤ ij la”kksf/kr
vuq”kklu ,oa vihy fu;e 1968 ds varxZr dkjZokbZ fd, tkus ds fy, vki
mRrjnk;h gSa A
By doing this Act. Sri Ranjeet Singh (Design) ) LP at CC/Loco/BIA has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: Y.K.Dewangan
Design: Sr. DME(Frt.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri M.R.Pudke (Design) Junior Engineer Gr.-II (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/DURG is
hereby informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against
him under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri M.R.Pudke is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through proper
channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri M.R.Pudke is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri
M.R.Pudke ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri M.R.Pudke (By order and in the
name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri M.R.Pudke
Design: Junior Engineer Gr.-II
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri M.R.Pudke,
Design: - Junior Engineer Gr.-II of SSE/C&W/DURG
That the said Sri M.R.Pudke, while functioning as Junior Engineer Gr.-II at
SSE/C&W/DURG is alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On 01.07.2012milk tank no. WN/87/74 attached in rear of train no.E/12833 Dn express got
derailed at km.no.448/28 to 26 between SXN-GP on down main line at about 6:10 hrs.wheel disc
no.4 of milk tanker broken on run which caused derailment. The brake binding of said milk tank
was attended by you. You had failed to identify leakage from DV, attended brake binding simply
by releasing through DV resulting derailment.
By this Act Sri M.R.Pudke, Design. Junior Engineer Gr.-II has contravened the provision of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action
under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of CSO/HQ letter No. CSO/Safety
/Other/Accdt./162/60 Date 30.01.13
2. Sr.DME/R (Safety section) for information please.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
fnukad 01-07-12 dks feYd Vsadj dz- Ogh Ogh ,u@87@74 tks
dh xkMh dz- bZ@12833 Mh ,u ,Dlizsl ds fiNs yxk Fkk og fd-eh-
u- 448@28 ls 26 vFkkZr ,l ,Dl ,u ,oa th ih ds fcp Mkmu
esuykbZu ij djhc 6%10 cts fMjsy gks x;k D;ksfd feYd Vsadj dk
Oghy fMLd dz 4 XkkMh pyrs oDr QV x;k Fkk] ftlds QyLo#i
fMjsyesaV gqvkA mDr feYd Vsadj dk czsd ckbZufMx dk lq/kkj
dk;Z vki Lo;a mifLFkr gksdj djk;s Fks] fdUrq czsd ckbZufMx dk
lq/kkj dk;Z lk/kkj.k gh Mh Ogh fjyht djds xkMh dks tkus fn;kA
vr% vkius czsd ckbZufMx dk lq/kkj dk;Z Bhd rjg ls ugha djk;k
tks fd vkids dk;Z ds izfr mnklhurk ,oa vuq“kklughurk dk ifjpk;d
gS ftlds fy, vki iw.kZ :i ls ftEesnkj gSa A
On 01.07.2012milk tank no. VVN/87/74 attached in rear of train no.E/12833 Dn express got
derailed at km.no.448/28 to 26 between SXN-GP on down main line at about 6:10 hrs.wheel disc
no.4 of milk tanker broken on run which caused derailment. The brake binding of said milk tank
was attended by you. You had failed to identify leakage from DV, attended brake binding simply
by releasing through DV resulting derailment.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Naresh Kumar (Desig.) JE (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2 Sri Naresh Kumar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Naresh Kumar is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri Naresh Kumar ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Naresh Kumar (By order and in
the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri Naresh Kumar
Design: JE
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri Naresh
Kumar, Desig. JE of SSE/C&W/DURG
That the said Sri Naresh Kumar, while functioning as JE at SSE/C&W/DURG is alleged to
have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On 21.02.2013 Train no. 18204 (Kanpur – Durg Exp.) detained at SLH due to break binding on
coach SEC 05707 SLRD from 12:04 hrs to 12:57 hrs (i.e. 53 minutes). Crew, Guard and station staff
was tried to rectify by manual release of DV & rotating SAB but could not rectified. Thereafter, they
tried to remove brake gear pin of floating lever but it takes more time as the bulb cotter was spreaded
wrongly.
Since the train 18203/04 was examined by you and not maintained the piston stroke of 40mm
during pit maintenance, hence you are responsible for the above detention of train.
By this Act Sri Naresh Kumar, Design. JE has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii)
of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS (D&A)
rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
___________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. what exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord.)
MEMORANDUM
1- Jh ,-ds nsokaxu ¼inuke½ yksdks ik;yV laVj ¼dk;kZy; ftuesa dke djrs gks ½
dzw daVªksyj@yksdks@fHkykbZ dks ,rn~ }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd
jk’Vªifr@jsyos cksMZ@fuEugLrk{kjh muds fo#) jsy deZpkjh ¼vuq”kklu vkSj
vihy½ fu;e] 1968 ds fu;e 11 ds varxZr dk;Zokgh djus dk izLrko djrk gS@dkjrs
gSa A nqO;Zogkj ;k vopkj ds ykaNuksa dk ,d fooj.k layXu gS] ftl ij mi;qZDr
dkjZokbZ dk izLrko gS A
1. Sri A.K.Dewangan (Design) ) LPS (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2- Jh ,-ds nsokaxu dks ,rn~ }kjk ;g volj fn;k tkrk gS fd bl izLrko ds fo#) o tks
Hkh vH;kosnu nsuk pkgs] nsa A vH;kosnu ;fn nsuk gks] fuEugLrk{kjh dks ¼}kjk
dzw daVªksyj@yksdks@fHkykbZ ½ jsyos ds egkizcU/kd ds ek/;e ls] ftlls mDr
egkizcU/kd ds ikl igq¡p lds½ bl Kkiu dh izkfIr ds nl fnu ds Hkhrj izLrqr fd;k tk, A
2. Sri A.K.Dewangan (Design) ) LPS is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as
he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3- ;fn Jh ,-ds nsokaxu iSjk 2 esa fofufnZ’V vof/k ds Hkhrj vH;kosnu izLrqr ugha
djrs rks ;g eku fy;k tk;sxk fd mUgsa
dksbZ vH;kosnu ugha nsuk gS vkSj Jh ,-ds nsokaxu ds fo#) ,d i{kh; vkns”k
ikfjr fd;s tk ldsaxs A
3. If Sri A.K.Dewangan (Design) ) LPS is fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri A.K.Dewangan (Design) ) LPS ex-parte.
(2)
vfHk;ksx dk fooj.k ftlds vk/kkj ij Jh ,-ds nsokaxu inuke yksdks ik;yV laVj
@ dzw daVªksyj@yksdks@fHkykbZ ds fo#) vuq”kklfud dkjZokbZ fd;k
tkuk gS A
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri
A.K.Dewangan (Design) LPS at CC/Loco/BIA.
Derailment of wagon no. SR44045, SE166142, SC 76537 & ER 40438 BoxN/E over the
DS point No 111 of shunting neck 01 at PPYd /coal empty on date 17.02.2013 at 21:00hrs.
On date 17.02.2013, 11 nos.BOXN/E wagons were programmed to be placed in siding line no.01
from line no.01 ex shunting neck 01 for sorting out of sick/fit wagons with the shunting loco no. 36039
WDS6. After clearing, the DS point no.111 it stopped and when it was being pushed back, four wagons
from rear end derailed over the open DS point at about 21:00 hrs. on 17.02.2013.You have failed to
proper communication between the shunting staff over walkie-talkie and pushed back before setting of
the said DS point. It reflects clear-cut laxity on your part of duty.
vius mijksDr d`R; ls] vkius crkSj ,d jsy lsod] js-ls- vkpj.k fu;e 1966
ds 3-1 (ii) (iii) dk mYya?ku fd;k gS A vr% le;≤ ij la”kksf/kr
vuq”kklu ,oa vihy fu;e 1968 ds varxZr dkjZokbZ fd, tkus ds fy, vki
mRrjnk;h gSa A
By doing this Act. Sri A.K.Dewangan (Design) ) LPS at CC/Loco/BIA has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: R.Ranga Rao
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
Copy to- 1.Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of you letter No. Safety/R/Accdt
case./PPYD/8/8654 Date 25.02.13
2. Sr.DME/R (Safety section) for information please.
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe (Design) Section Engineer (Office in which working) C&W/Durg is
hereby informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against
him under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned
(through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para
– 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Sri Nilesh Ninawe, ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe.
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe
Design: - Section Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/Durg
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri
Nilesh Kumar Ninawe, Desig: - Section Engineer of C&W/Durg
.
That the said Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe, while functioning as Section Engineer at C&W/Durg
is alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
You have examined the train no 12070 Jansatabdi Express upper gear maintenance .
During the inspection by under signed from Raipur to Durg on date 28.03.2013 found following
deficiency.
By the above Act of omission and commission, Sri Nilesh Kumar Ninawe, Section Engineer
under SSE/C&W/Durg has failed to maintain the absolute integrity and acted in a manner unbecoming
a Rly. Servant thereby contravening Rule No. – 3.1 (ii) & (iii) by railway service (conducted) Rules
rendered himself liable to be taken up under Railway servant (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time
to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri R.C.Meena (Design) ) Sr.ALP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed, that
the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri R.C.Meena (Design) )Sr.A LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri R.C.Meena (Design) )Sr.A LP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri R.C.Meena (Design) )Sr.A LP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri R.C.Meena (Design) )Sr.A LP.
(By order and in the name of the President).
To,
Name: - Sri R.C.Meena,
Design: Sr.A LP,
Office: - CC/Loco/DRZ
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri R.C.Meena
(Design) )Sr.A LP at CC/Loco/DRZ.
That the said Sri R.C.Meena, while functioning as Sr.ALP at CC/Loco/DRZ is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of Diesel locos no. 12365 WDG-4 A at about 11:00 hrs. over the point no. 42 of DRZ
yard on date 11.04.2013.
On date 11.04.2013 during your duty programme was given to place 15 BOBS/E with diesel engine
no. 12365 WDG-4 A for ready of outgoing train, While the engine with load was moving forward,
firstly it burst the motorized point no. 42 and again when it was being pulled back, leading trolley inner
two pair of wheel sets got derailed over the said point in two route condition.
You have failed to stop the engine and passing the shunt signal SH29 in ON condition resulting
derailment. This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By doing this Act. Sri R.C.Meena (Design) Sr.ALP at CC/Loco/DRZ has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident case/
DRZ/8/8759 Date 16.04.2013
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (Co-ord.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Pravin Kumar (Design) ) LP(P) (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/R is hereby informed, that
the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri Pravin Kumar (Design) ) LP(P) is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as
he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Pravin Kumar (Design) ) LP(P) is fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Pravin Kumar (Design) ) LP(P) ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri Pravin Kumar (Design) ) LP(P).
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Pravin Kumar,
Design: LP(P),
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Pravin
Kumar (Design) ) LP(P) at CC/Loco/R.
That the said Sri Pravin Kumar, while functioning as LP(P) at CC/Loco/R is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of NG locos no. 213 ZDM 4A/R at about 09:55 hrs. at DTR yard on date 06.04.2013.
NG diesel locos no. 213 ZDM 4A/R got derailed at. DTR station yard at about 09:55 hrs while
reversing the engine from DTR end to R end to attach with the rake to work train no. 28714.on date
06.04.2013.
You have failed to control the loco resulting derailment. This shows that gross negligence on your
part of duty.
By doing this Act. Sri Pravin Kumar (Design) LP(P) at CC/Loco/R has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1. Sr. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident case/
DTR/8/8562 Date 17.04.2013
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ch. Satyanarayana (Design) Tech-III (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/R is hereby
informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him
under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri Ch. Satyanarayana is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Ch. Satyanarayana is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para –
2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Sri Ch. Satyanarayana, ex-parte.
Name: S.K.Verma
Design: A DME/PPYd/BIA
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Ch. Satyanarayana
Design: Tech-III
Office: - SSE/C&W/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Ch.
Satyanarayana Design: Khalasi Helper - I of SSE/C&W/R
That the said Sri Ch. Satyanarayana, while functioning as Khalasi Helper - I of SSE/C&W/R
is alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
Shri.Ch. Satyanarayana, Design. Tech – III working under SSE/C&W/R was unauthorized
absent from duty since 15.03.2013 to 21.03.2013 without any intimation to your immediate
supervisor/Incharge as reported by SSE/(C&W)/R vide letter NO. NIL Dt.16.05.2013
By this Act. Sri Ch. Satyanarayana Design Tech-III has contravened the provision of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under
RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: S.K.Verma
Design: A DME/PPYd/BIA
(Disciplinary authority)
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri M. Tata (Design) Junior Engineer (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby
informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him
under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri M. Tata is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through proper
channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri M. Tata is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will be
presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri M.
Tata ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri M. Tata (By order and in the name
of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&O.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri M. Tata
Design: Junior Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri M. Tata,
Design: - Junior Engineer of SSE/C&W/DURG
That the said Sri M. Tata, while functioning as Junior Engineer at SSE/C&W/DURG is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
You had attended Rolling in Examination of the incoming train no. 12854 Amarkantak
Exp. at Durg during your duty on 06.09. 2013. You have failed to detect temperature rise in the
axle Box of the coach in the train.
This is a great negligence from your part.
By this Act Sri M. Tata, Design. Junior Engineer has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS
(D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&O.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Anil Chandrikapure (Design) Tech-II (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby
informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him
under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri Anil Chandrikapure is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Sri Anil Chandrikapure is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Anil Chandrikapure ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Anil Chandrikapure (By order
and in the name of the President).
To,
Name: Sri Anil Chandrikapure
Design: Tech-II
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri Anil
Chandrikapure, Design: - Tech-II of SSE/C&W/DURG
That the said Sri Anil Chandrikapure, while functioning as Tech-II at SSE/C&W/DURG is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
You had attended Rolling in Examination of the incoming train no. 12854 Amarkantak
Exp. at Durg during your duty on 06.09. 2013. You have failed to detect temperature rise in the
axle Box of the coach in the train.
This is a great negligence from your part.
By this Act Sri Anil Chandrikapure, Design. Tech-II has contravened the provision of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under
RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri A.K.Mehta (Design) ) LP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BMY is hereby informed, that the
President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2 Sri A.K.Mehta (Design) ) LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned
(through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri A.K.Mehta (Design) ) LP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri A.K.Mehta (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri A.K.Mehta (Design) ) LP.
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri A.K.Mehta,
Design: LP,
Office: - CC/Loco/BMY
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri A.K.Mehta
(Design) ) LP at CC/Loco/BMY.
That the said Sri A.K.Mehta, while functioning as LP at CC/Loco/BMY is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of Diesel locos no. 12402 WDG-4 at DPH Yard over D/S point no.48 on date 03.11.13
at 01:05 hrs.
On date 03.11.13, train no.BOBS/Dolo was drawn out to line no. 06 of DPH yard at 00:00 hrs.
Diesel engine detached to line no. 05 on shunting movement. Diesel loco no. 12402 WDG-4 got derailed
on D/S point no.48 at about 01:05 hrs.
You have failed to taken precautions properly as mentioned in GR 5.13 and SR there of. resulting
derailment. This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By doing this Act. Sri A.K.Mehta (Design) LP at CC/Loco/BMY has contravened the provision
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary
action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Copy to-1. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident case/
DPH/8/9124 Date 05.11.2013
2. Sr.DME/R (Safety section) for information
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri L.K.Sahu (Design) ) ALP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BMY is hereby informed, that the
President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2 Sri L.K.Sahu (Design) ) ALP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned
(through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri L.K.Sahu (Design) )A LP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri L.K.Sahu (Design) ) ALP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri L.K.Sahu (Design) ) ALP.
(By order and in the name of the President).
To,
Name: - Sri L.K.Sahu,
Design: ALP,
Office: - CC/Loco/BMY
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri L.K.Sahu
(Design) ) ALP at CC/Loco/BMY.
That the said Sri L.K.Sahu, while functioning as ALP at CC/Loco/BMY is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of Diesel locos no. 12402 WDG-4 at DPH Yard over D/S point no.48 on date
03.11.13 at 01:05 hrs.
On date 03.11.13, train no.BOBS/Dolo was drawn out to line no. 06 of DPH yard at 00:00 hrs.
Diesel engine detached to line no. 05 on shunting movement. Diesel loco no. 12402 WDG-4 got derailed
on D/S point no.48 at about 01:05 hrs.
You have failed to taken precautions properly as mentioned in GR 5.13 and SR there of. resulting
derailment. This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By doing this Act. Sri L.K.Sahu (Design) ALP at CC/Loco/BMY has contravened the provision
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary
action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1. DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident case/
DPH/8/9124 Date 05.11.2013
2. Sr.DME/R (Safety section) for information .
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Sujit Kumar (Design) ) Sr.ALP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BMY is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2 Sri Sujit Kumar (Design) )Sr. ALP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Sujit Kumar (Design) ) Sr.ALP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Sujit Kumar (Design) ) Sr.ALP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri Sujit Kumar (Design) ) Sr.ALP.
(By order and in the name of the President).
To,
Name: - Sri Sujit Kumar,
Design: Sr.ALP,
Office: - CC/Loco/BMY
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Sujit Kumar
(Design) ) Sr.ALP at CC/Loco/BMY.
That the said Sri Sujit Kumar, while functioning as Sr.ALP at CC/Loco/BMY is alleged to
have committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of Wagon No. SE 165506 BONNUG/E and ER 66347 BONNUG/E at sick line no. 2 on date
14.12.2013 at about 04:30 hrs.
On date 14.12.13, While 35 sick wagons were being pushing back in line no. 2 for sick line
placement, rearmost 02 wagons no. SE 165506 BONNUG/E and ER 66347 BONNUG/E were got
derailed after breaching the dead end at about 14:30 hrs. on date 14.12.2013 due to poor co-ordination
during shunting operation with shunting staff i.e. porter and PM.
This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By doing this Act. Sri Sujit Kumar (Design) ) Sr.ALP at CC/Loco/BMY has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to- 1. DSO/R for information, in response to letter No. Safety /R/Accident case/ PPYD/8/36 Date
30.12.2013
2. Sr.DME/R (Safety section) for information in response to DSO/R letter no. Safety /R/Accident
case/ PPYD/8/36 Date 30.12.2013
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Hasim Khan (Design) Sr.Tech (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri Hasim Khan is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Hasim Khan is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri
Hasim Khan ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Hasim Khan (By order and in the
name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri Hasim Khan
Design: Sr.Tech
Office: - SSE/C&W/Durg
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri Hasim Khan,
Design: - Sr.Tech of SSE/C&W/Durg.
That the said Sri Hasim Khan, while functioning as Sr.Tech at SSE/C&W/Durg is alleged to
have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 06.01.2014 at about 16:15 hrs. Diesel power no.16468 WDM-3A/VSKP rolled
down on line no.4 towards mechanized laundry plant Durg and hit the empty barrels which were
lying near laundry plant. You were deputed to work and protect the accidental movement of
rolling stock (Loco), but you were not found in the duty place. As you were not present, the rolling
down could not be prevented by you.
This is gross negligence in work on your part.”
By this Act Sri Hasim Khan, Design. Sr.Tech has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS
(D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
___________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. what exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge
.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri A.Venkat Rao (Design) ) LP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BMY is hereby informed, that
the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri A.Venkat Rao (Design) LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri A.Venkat Rao (Design) ) LP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri A.Venkat Rao (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri A.Venkat Rao (Design) LP.
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri A.Venkat Rao,
Design: Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/BMY
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri A.Venkat
Rao Design: - LP at CC/Loco/BMY.
That the said Sri A.Venkat Rao, while functioning as LP at CC/Loco/BMY is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of Diesel shunting engine no. 36004 WDS6/R over the DS point No. 101A of siding
line no.02 of PPYD/E BIA on date 11.01.2014 at about 04:40 hrs.
On date 11.01.2014 during your duty 06 fit wagons were drawn out from siding 02 to line no.06
for attaching wagon to the rake of L/no.03.Again after detaching 01 wagon to L/no. 06 rest 05 wagons
were pushed back to siding, line no. 02. After detaching these 05 wagons, when the shunting engine
move forward, its leading trolley all three pair of wheel set got derailed over the DS point no.101A on
date 11.01.2014 at about 04:40 hrs. due to you have failed to ensure the signal and proceeded.
By doing this Act. Sri A.Venkat Rao, Design LP at CC/Loco/BMY has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered himself liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1.DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident case/
8/PPYD/121 Date 24.01.2014
2. Sr.DME/R Safety section for information please.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri V.K. Sarwa (Design) ) LP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/Ris hereby informed, that the
President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri V.K. Sarwa (Design) LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned
(through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Sri V.K. Sarwa(Design) ) LP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri V.K. Sarwa (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri V.K. Sarwa(Design) LP.
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri V.K. Sarwa,
Design: Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri V.K.
SarwaDesign: - LP at CC/Loco/R.
That the said Sri V.K. Sarwa, while functioning as LP at CC/Loco/R is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of Diesel engine no. 18835 WDM3A/R over the DS point No. 47B of RSD yard on
date 14.03.2014 at about 09:35 hrs.
On date 14.03.2014 Diesel engine no. 18835 WDM3A you placed in DLS line no 02 and shut
down at about 08:00 hrs. About 09:35 hrs its leading trolley all three wheels set and trailing trolley
leading wheel-set got derailed over the DS point no. 47B. After shutdown the said loco you have
applied two wooden skids on right wheel of fourth axle but didn’t apply the hand brake properly. You
have failed to do your work properly resulting derailment took place.
By doing this Act. Sri V.K. Sarwa, Design LP at CC/Loco/R has contravened the provision of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered himself liable for disciplinary action
under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1.DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident case/
8/RSD/307Date 19.03.2014
2. Sr.DME/R Safety section for information and record.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ramchandra Sahu (Design) ) ALP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/Ris hereby informed, that
the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri Ramchandra Sahu (Design) A LP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation
as he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Ramchandra Sahu (Design) ) ALP is fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be
liable to be passed against Sri Ramchandra Sahu (Design) ) ALP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri Ramchandra Sahu (Design) ALP.
(By order and in the name of the President).
To,
Name: - Sri Sri Ramchandra Sahu,
Design: Asst.Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Ramchandra
Sahu Design: - ALP at CC/Loco/R.
That the said Sri Ramchandra Sahu, while functioning as ALP at CC/Loco/R is alleged to
have committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of Diesel engine no. 18835 WDM3A/R over the DS point No. 47B of RSD yard on
date 14.03.2014 at about 09:35 hrs.
On date 14.03.2014 Diesel engine no. 18835 WDM3A you placed in DLS line no 02 and shut
down at about 08:00 hrs. About 09:35 hrs its leading trolley all three wheels set and trailing trolley
leading wheel-set got derailed over the DS point no. 47B. After shutdown the said loco you have
applied two wooden skids on right wheel of fourth axle but didn’t apply the hand brake properly. You
have failed to do your work properly resulting derailment took place.
By doing this Act. Sri Ramchandra Sahu, Design ALP at CC/Loco/R has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered himself liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1.DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident case/
8/RSD/307Date 19.03.2014
2. Sr.DME/R Safety section for information and record.
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri H.C.Nayak is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through proper
channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri H.C.Nayak is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri
H.C.Nayak ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri H.C.Nayak (By order and in the
name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri H.C.Nayak
Design: Sr.Section Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri H.C.Nayak,
Design: - Sr.Section Engineer of SSE/C&W/DURG
That the said Sri H.C.Nayak, while functioning as Sr.Section Engineer at SSE/C&W/DURG
is alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
“As Per report of SSE/C&W/Durg you have been deputed to upper gear examination duty on
27.03.2014 of Train No. 12823/12824 sampark kranti express at Durg. The A-1 coach and composite
was in very bad condition, flush not working, exhaust fen not working, snack table missing
This is gross negligence in work on your part.
By this Act Sri H.C.Nayak,, Design. Sr.Section Engineer has contravened the provision of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action
under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Y.K.Baghel (Design) ) LP (DPC/R) (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/R is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri Y.K.Baghel (Design) LP(DPC/R) is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation
as he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Y.K.Baghel (Design) ) LP (DPC/R) is fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be
liable to be passed against Sri V.K. Baghel (Design) ) LP (DPC/R) ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri Y.K.Baghel (Design) LP(DPC/R).
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Y.K.Baghel,
Design: Loco Pilot(DPC/R)
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Y.K.Baghel
Design: - LP (DPC/R) at CC/Loco/R.
That the said Sri Y.K.Baghel, while functioning as LP (DPC/R) at CC/Loco/R is alleged to
have committed a serious misconduct in that,
Sri P.Khare, LP of loco/R booked to work train no. N/MGCH at 16:45 hrs on 06.04.2014 .You
have not planned to relieve the crew at HN to avoid more than 12 hrs. duty resulting long hours. Hence
you are responsible for long hour’s duty.
By doing this Act. Sri Y.K.Baghel, Design LP (DPC/R) at CC/Loco/R has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered himself liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W)
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri A.B.Bhattacharya (Design) ) LP (DPC/R) is fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be
liable to be passed against Sri A.B.Bhattacharya (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri A.B.Bhattacharya,
Design: Loco Pilot(DPC/R)
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri
A.B.Bhattacharya Design: - LP(DPC/R) at CC/Loco/R.
By doing this Act. Sri A.B.Bhattacharya, Design LP(DPC/R) at CC/Loco/R has contravened
the provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered himself liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W)
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri P.K.Chandrawanshi (Design) ) LP is fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be
liable to be passed against Sri P.K.Chandrawanshi (Design) ) LP ex-parte.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri P.K.Chandrawanshi,
Design: Loco Pilot
Office: - CC/Loco/BIA
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Design: - LPat
CC/Loco/BIA.
By doing this Act. Sri P.K.Chandrawanshi, Design LP at CC/Loco/BIA has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered himself liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri H.L. Sahu (Design) ) LP (DPC/R) (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/R is hereby informed, that
the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri H.L. Sahu (Design) ) LP (DPC/R) is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation
as he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri H.L. Sahu (Design) ) LP (DPC/R) is fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be
liable to be passed against Sri H.L. Sahu (Design) ) LP (DPC/R ) ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri H.L. Sahu (Design) ) LP (DPC/R ).
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri H.L.Sahu,
Design: Loco Pilot(DPC/R)
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri H.L.Sahu,
Design: - LP (DPC/R) at CC/Loco/R.
That the said Sri H.L.Sahu, while functioning as LP (DPC/R) at CC/Loco/R is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
Sri U.K. Shriwastawa, LP of loco/R booked to work train no. N/MGCH at 12:00 hrs on
02.05.2014 .You have not planned to relieve the crew at HN to avoid more than 12 hrs. duty resulting
long hours of 16:30 hrs. Hence you are responsible for long hour’s duty.
By doing this Act. Sri H.L.Sahu, Design LP (DPC/R) at CC/Loco/R has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered himself liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri H.C.Nayak is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through proper
channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri H.C.Nayak is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri
H.C.Nayak ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri H.C.Nayak (By order and in the
name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri H.C.Nayak
Design: Sr.Section Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri H.C.Nayak,
Design: - Sr.Section Engineer of SSE/C&W/DURG
That the said Sri H.C.Nayak, while functioning as Sr.Section Engineer at SSE/C&W/DURG
is alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
Train No. 12853/12854 Amarkantak express detained 0:34 hrs. at Anuppur from 02:36 hrs. to
03:13 hrs on 27.05.2014 due to brake binding of coach no. SEC 05103 ACCN.
You were in-charge of under gear examination of the above train on 25.05.2014. You have failed
in discharging your duty properly, this has resulted is Bk.binding of the above coach.
This is gross negligence in work on your part.
By this Act Sri H.C.Nayak,, Design. Sr.Section Engineer has contravened the provision of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action
under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri D. Rama Rao (Design) ) LPG (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BMY is hereby informed, that
the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri D. Rama Rao (Design) LPG is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri D. Rama Rao (Design) ) LPG is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri D. Rama Rao (Design) ) LPG ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri D. Rama Rao (Design) LPG.
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri D. Rama Rao,
Design: Loco Pilot (G)
Office: - CC/Loco/BMY
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri D. Rama
Rao Design: - LPG at CC/Loco/BMY.
That the said Sri D. Rama Rao, while functioning as LPG at CC/Loco/BMY is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
Derailment of Diesel Loco no. 36031 WDS6 over the DS point No. 52/E of sick line BMY on
date 30.05.2014 at about 05:40 hrs.
On date 30.05.2014 Diesel loco no. 36031 WDS6/R with 40 wagons programmed to drawn out
from sick line/BMY in due course while moving forwards towards “I’ cabin end passed DS point
no.52/E in open condition and at 05:40 hrs its all wheels of leading trolley got derailed over the DS
point no. 52/E. You have failed to do your work properly resulting derailment took place.
By doing this Act. Sri D. Rama Rao, Design LPG at CC/Loco/BMY has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered himself liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Copy to-1.DSO/Raipur for information please in connection of your letter No. Safety /R/Accident case/ 8/BMY/
560 Date 06.06.2014
2. Sr.DME/R Safety section for information and record.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri R.K.Pandey is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through proper
channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri R.K.Pandey is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri
H.C.Nayak ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri R.K.Pandey (By order and in the
name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri R.K.Pandey
Design: Jr. Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri R.K.Pandey,
Design: - Jr. Engineer of SSE/C&W/DURG
Train No. 18201 (Durg-NTV Express) detained 22 min. (in sec. SNGP - SDL 17 min. and 05
min. at SDL on 02.07.2014 due to BP pipe uncoupled between coach B1 (SEC 05104 ACCN) and B2
(SEC 11105 ACCN) at SNGP – SDL,section (KM905/9). You were in-charge of under gear
examination of the above train. You have failed in discharging your duty properly, this has resulted BP
pipe uncoupled of the above coach.
This is gross negligence in work on your part
By this Act Sri R.K.Pandey, Design. Jr.Engineer has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS
(D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri F.R.Sahu is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through proper
channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri F.R.Sahu is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will be
presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri
F.R.Sahu ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri F.R.Sahu (By order and in the
name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri F.R.Sahu
Design: Jr. Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri F.R.Sahu,
Design: - Jr. Engineer of SSE/C&W/DURG
That the said Sri F.R.Sahu, while functioning as Jr.Engineer at SSE/C&W/DURG is alleged
to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 14.05.2014 break binding occured in coach no. SEC 05108 ACCN of train no.
18208 on dated 14.05.2014 at BYT station.
You were Testing supervisor of under gear examination of the above train. You have
failed in discharging your duty properly, this has resulted brake binding of the above coach in
said train.
You have failed in discharging your duty properly, this has resulted break binding of the above
coach.
This is gross negligence in work on your part
By this Act Sri F.R.Sahu, Design. Jr.Engineer has contravened the provision of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under RS
(D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Sadhuram Sinha (Design) Jr.Engineer (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby
informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him
under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri Sadhuram Sinha is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Sadhuram Sinha is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri Sadhuram Sinha ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Sadhuram Sinha (By order and in
the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O.&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri Sadhuram Sinha
Design: Jr. Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/BIA
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri Sadhuram
Sinha, Design: - Jr. Engineer of SSE/C&W/BIA
That the said Sri Sadhuram Sinha, while functioning as Jr.Engineer at SSE/C&W/BIA is
alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 28.10.2014 brake binding occured in wagon no. ECOR 22120937915 BOST(LD)
of train no. F/SSPS/KLMR at BQR station IInd station from originating station.
BPC of this train was issued on 28.10.2014 by you and you have failed in discharging
your duty properly, this has resulted brake binding of the above wagon in said train.
By this Act Sri Sadhuram Sinha, Design. Jr.Engineer has contravened the provision of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action under
RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O.&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri M.K.Desmukh (Design) ) Sr.ALP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/R is hereby informed, that
the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II of the
Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri M.K.Desmukh (Design) ) Sr.ALP) is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation
as he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri M.K.Desmukh (Design) ) Sr.ALP) is fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be
liable to be passed against Sri M.K.Desmukh (Design) ) Sr.ALP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri M.K.Desmukh (Design) ) Sr.ALP
(By order and in the name of the President).
To,
Name: - Sri M.K.Desmukh
Design: Sr.ALP
Office: - CC/Loco/R
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri
M.K.Desmukh (Design) ) Sr.ALP) at CC/Loco/R.
That the said Sri M.K.Desmukh, while functioning as Sr.ALP at CC/Loco/R is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 29.10.2014 during your duty you have failed in discharging your duty properly, i.e.
identity fid the problem long hood side BC equalizing cut out cock open condition this has
resulted MAR pressure not building of the train and the train detained from 08:30 hrs to
11:00hrs at RSD.
By doing this Act. Sri M.K.Desmukh, Design Sr.ALP at CC/Loco/R has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered himself liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri M.K.Sharma is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri M.K.Sharma is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri M.K.Sharma ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri M.K.Sharma (By order and in the
name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri M.K.Sharma
Design: Sr.Section Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/BIA
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri
M.K.Sharma, Design: - Sr.Section Engineer of SSE/C&W/BIA
That the said Sri M.K.Sharma, while functioning as Sr.Section Engineer at SSE/C&W/BIA
is alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
1. On 6/07.11 20104 during your duty from 22:00 hrs to 06:00 hrs.at Ex.Yard BIA you did not
attend any train from 22:00 hrs to 23:00 hrs.
2. Took 01:00 hrs. for Screening of 13 BRN panel rail part rake which is beyond permissible time
limit.
3. Took a time of 03:00 hrs. from 0:10 hrs. to 03:20 hrs for outgoing/safe to run examination of
loaded rake O/G BOST/Ld on line no.03 which is beyond the time allowed and did not mention
any special repairs attended on train.(With a block from 02:40 hrs to 03:20 hrs as mentioned in
D-11 Register is not clear)
4. Train No. I/C Fld/E on L/No. 13 intensive examined for 02:30 hrs. and given charge for
changing of 03 nos of EM pads and one brake block.
By this Act Sri M.K.Sharma,, Design. Sr.Section Engineer has contravened the provision of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action
under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
S.E.C.RAILWAY
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri N.Shirbhate is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through proper
channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri N.Shirbhate is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri
Sri N.Shirbhate ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri N.Shirbhate (By order and in the
name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri N.Shirbhate
Design: Sr.Section Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/DURG
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri N.Shirbhate,
Design: - Sr.Section Engineer of SSE/C&W/DURG
That the said Sri N.Shirbhate, while functioning as Sr.Section Engineer at SSE/C&W/DURG
is alleged to have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 30.11.2014 you have received HQ message to detach over due IOH Coach no. SEC
13205 WGSCN from train no. 18215 on 02.12.14 at 04:00 hrs. The same coach was detached from the
said train and again attached with train no.18241 at 14:00 hrs. on 03.12.2014 by Shri B. D.
Basak/JE/C&W/Durg as per your instruction. Thus you have failed to follow the instruction given by
HQ and ignored the same.
By this Act Sri N.Shirbhate,, Design. Sr.Section Engineer has contravened the provision of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for disciplinary action
under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri D.Shiv Kumar (Design) ) LP(G) (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/BMY is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2 Sri D.Shiv Kumar (Design) ) LP(G)is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as
he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri D.Shiv Kumar (Design) ) LP(G) is fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri D.Shiv Kumar (Design) ) LP(G) ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri D.Shiv Kumar (Design) ) LP(G).
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri D.Shiv Kumar,
Design: LP(G),
Office: - CC/Loco/BMY
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri D.Shiv
Kumar (Design) ) LP(G) at CC/Loco/BMY.
That the said Sri D.Shiv Kumar, while functioning as LP(G) at CC/Loco/BMY is alleged to
have committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 19.12.2014 in the chamber of under signed, when checking the knowledge of GR by the
undersigned it is found that you have failed to give the correct answer regarding rules related to duties of
loco pilot and GR 3.78.
This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By doing this Act Sri D.Shiv Kumar (Design) LP(G) at CC/Loco/BMY has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Rajesh Thakur (Design) ) LP(P) (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2 Sri Rajesh Thakur (Design) ) LP(P)is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as
he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Rajesh Thakur (Design) ) LP(P) is fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Rajesh Thakur (Design) ) LP(P) ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri Rajesh Thakur (Design) ) LP(P).
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Rajesh Thakur,
Design: LP(P),
Office: - CC/Loco/Raipur
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Rajesh
Thakur (Design) ) LP(P) at CC/Loco/BMY.
That the said Sri Rajesh Thakur, while functioning as LP(P) at CC/Loco/R is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
While working train No. 58720 with Loco no. 227 on 19.01.2015, RIM to AVP while approaching to
level crossing gate at KM 868/9-10 made slight dash on truck No. CG 04 J6749. As a loco pilot you
were not stopped the train with adequate distance to avoid dashing. This shows that gross negligence
on your part of duty.
By doing this Act Sri Rajesh Thakur (Design) LP(P) at CC/Loco/R has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Pramod Kumar (Design) ) ALP (Office in which working) ) CC/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2 Sri Pramod Kumar (Design) ) ALP is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as
he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Pramod Kumar (Design) ) ALP is fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Pramod Kumar (Design) ) ALP ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri Pramod Kumar (Design) ) ALP.
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Pramod Kumar,
Design: ALP,
Office: - CC/Loco/Raipur
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Pramod
Kumar (Design) ) ALP at CC/Loco/Raipur.
That the said Sri Pramod Kumar, while functioning as ALP at CC/Loco/R is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
While working train No. 58720 with Loco no. 227 on 19.01.2015, RIM to AVP while approaching to
level crossing gate at KM 868/9-10 made slight dash on truck no. CG 04 J6749. You have not alerted
the LP by calling out stop signal in advance. Hence you have failed to help LP in stopping the train at
proper place. This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By doing this Act Sri Pramod Kumar (Design) ALP at CC/Loco/R has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
CHARGE SHEET FOR IMPOSITION OF MINOR PENALTIES
(For non-gazetted staff only)
(Railway Board’s standard form no.-11)
DISCIPLINE AND APPEAL RULES
RULE - XI- RS (D&A)
[Rules 1968]
Office of the
Sr. DME (C&W.)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ramanuj Singh (Design) LP/DPC. (Office in which working) CDPC/Raipur is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2 Ramanuj Singh (Design) ) LP/DPC. is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as
he may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to
undersigned (through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Ramanuj Singh (Design) ) LP/DPC. is fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be
liable to be passed against Sri Ramanuj Singh (Design) ) LP/DPC. ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged Sri Ramanuj Singh (Design) LP/DPC.
(By order and in the name of the President).
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: - Sri Ramanuj Singh
Design: LP/DPC,
Office: - CDPC/Raipur
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken against Sri Ramanuj
Singh (Design) ) LP/DPC at CDPC/Raipur.
That the said Sri Ramanuj Singh, while functioning as LP/DPC at CDPC/R is alleged to have
committed a serious misconduct in that,
On date 02.02.2015, While functioning the work of DPC/R midnight position, you did not mentioned
the reason of long hours cases and long PDD properly in midnight position prescribed format and leave
the blank. Resulting, CME/SECR/BSP upset with the same. This shows gross negligence on your
part of duty.
By doing this Act Sri Ramanuj Singh (Design) LP/DPC at CDPC/R has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered him self liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: M.Raveendran
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
________________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Atul Kumar, ALP/CCC/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Atul Kumar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Atul Kumar fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Atul Kumar ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Atul Kumar has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(iii) & 20 of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2 Shri Khumesh is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Khumesh fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Shri Khumesh ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Khumesh has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct)
Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as
amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri R.K.Binayak, Loco Pilot (G)/CCC/Loco/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri R.K.Binayak is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri R.K.Binayak fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri R.K.Binayak ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
(i) DS Point no. 107 found in normal condition and shunt signal connected
this point is in ON condition, which you were disregarded the signal
aspect and lead to the said derailment of two BOXN/E wagons at coal
empty PP Yard.
(ii) As per the joint findings and acceptance of competent authority, you
are held responsible in this case vide letter no. Safety/R/accident
case/8/PPYd dated 05.02.2015.
In this connection you were found gross negligence on your part while on duty. Why
disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Shri R.K.Binayak has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct)
Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as
amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Ramcharan Meena, LocoPilot /CC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Ramcharan Meena is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Ramcharan Meena fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para
2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Ramcharan Meena ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Ramcharan Meena has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct)
Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as
amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri P.K.Chandrakar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri P.K.Chandrakar is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2,
it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Sri P.K.Chandraker ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri P.K.Chandrakar (By order and in
the name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri Sri P.K.Chandrakar
Design: Sr.Section Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/BMY
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri
P.K.Chandrakaa, Design: - Sr.Section Engineer of SSE/C&W/BMY
On date 28.07.2015, you were deputed to examine train no. N/USD at line no. up through loop-1
at BMY. You have detected that there was problem in the train pipe of wagon no. SE127758 BOXN/Ld.
As the problem could only be rectified by repair by welding or replacement; you did not take timely
decision to mark sick the wagon.
Rather you tried in vain trying to arrest the leakage with polythene/ rubber. In this process, you
unnecessarily detained the whole train and it resulted in unsatisfactory feature reported by Operating.
This is gross negligence in work on your part.
By this Act Sri P.K.Chandrakar,, Design. Sr.Section Engineer/BMY has contravened the
provision of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R.S. conduct Rule 1966 and there by rendered himself liable for
disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2 Shri Sanjay Kumar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Sanjay Kumar fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Sanjay Kumar ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Sanjay Kumar has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct)
Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as
amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Murlidhar Tata (Design) Sr.Section Engineer (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Durg is
hereby informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against
him under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri Murlidhar Tata is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Murlidhar Tata is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri Murlidhar Tata ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Murlidhar Tata (By order and in
the name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri Murlidhar Tata
Design: Sr.Section Engineer
Office: - SSE/C&W/Durg
Copy to: - Dy. CVO (E) /BSP for kind information please, in reference to letter No.
Ogh@V512074/2418-20/960 fnukad 04.08.2015.
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri Murlidhar Tata,
Design: - Sr.Section Engineer of SSE/C&W/Durg
That Shri Murlidhar Tata, while working as JE/C&W/Durg during year 2012 has committed
gross misconduct in as much as:
That Shri Murlidhar Tata, while working as JE/C&W/Durg during year 2012 was the supervisor
in-charge of C&W/Durg and he was responsible for maintain and checking the attendance register of the
staff working under his control.
Shri A.K. Joshi, tech-II working under SSE/C&W/Durg had applied for 3 days LAP from
11.03.12 to 13.03.12 which was forwarded by Shri Murlidhar Tata (RUD-1) and the same was posted in
the leave register (RUD-2). However, leave for the above period was not marked by Shri Murlidhar Tata
on the attendance register (RUD-3 & RUD-5).
After returning from leave, Shri Joshi signed the attendance register even for the days, he availed
leave i.e. from 11.03.12 to 13.03.12 as the attendance register was kept blank (RUD-3). Thus, Shri
Murlidhar Tata exhibited casual approach in maintenance of attendance register and left the scope for
manipulation by Shri A.K. Joshi.
Thus, by the above act, Shri Murlidhar Tata, JE/C&W/Durg failed to maintain devotion to duty.
Thereby, he violated the provisions of Rule 3.1 (ii) of Railway Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and there
by rendered himself liable for disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to
time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Bapi Devnath (Design) O.S. (Office in which working) SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed,
that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against him under Rule II
of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the imputation of the
misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above, is shown in
the over leaf.
2. Sri Bapi Devnath is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned (through
proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Bapi Devnath is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in Para – 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Sri Bapi Devnath ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Bapi Devnath (By order and in the
name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri Bapi Devnath
Design: O.S.
Office: - SSE/C&W/Durg
Copy to: - Dy. CVO (E) /BSP for kind information please, in reference to letter No.
Ogh@V512074/2418-20/960 fnukad 04.08.2015.
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Sri Bapi Devnath,
Design: - O.S. of SSE/C&W/Durg.
That Shri Bapi devnath, while working as OS under SSE/C&W/Durg during year 2012 has committed
gross misconduct in as much as:
That Shri Bapi Devnath, was responsible for maintaining and checking the attendance of the staff
working in the office of SSE/C&W/Durg.
Shri A.K. Joshi, Tech-II working under SSE/C&W/Durg had applied for 3 days LAP from 11.03.2012
to 13.03.2012 which was forwarded by Shri Murlidhar Tata (RUD-1) and the same was posted in the
leave register (RUD-2). However, leave for the above period was not marked by Shri Bapi Devnath on
the attendance register (RUD-3).
After returning from leave, Shri Joshi signed the attendance register even for the days, he availed leave
i.e. from 11.03.2012 to 13.03.2012 as the attendance register was kept blank by him till 24.03.2012
(RUD-3 & 4).
Thus, by the above act, Sri Bapi Devnath, O.S./C&W/Durg failed to maintain devotion to duty.
Thereby, he violated the provisions of Rule 3.1 (ii) of Railway Services (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and there
by rendered himself liable for disciplinary action under RS (D&A) rules 1968 as amended from time to
time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Yogesh Puri, Helper/SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Yogesh Puri is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Yogesh Puri fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Yogesh Puri ex-parte.
(Samar Kar)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
On 19.08.2015 fleshing the news by Durg-BIA bhaskar along with photo that the
watering of coaches of train no. 58529 (Durg-VSKP Passenger) by re-cycle waters at
platform no 06 at Durg. It is strictly provided never don the watering of coaches at
platform.
By the above act of Shri Sanjay Kumar has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct)
Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as
amended from time to time.
(Samar Kar)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri Yogesh Puri, Helper/SSE/C&W/Durg.
1 That Shri Yogesh Puri, Helper/SSE/C&W/Durg while functioning as
Helper of SSE/C&W/Durg, is alleged to have committed misconduct in that.
By the above act of Shri Sanjay Kumar has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct)
Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as
amended from time to time.
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2 Shri P.R.Baraskar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri P.R.Baraskar fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri P.R.Baraskar ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri P.R.Baraskar has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened t he provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Mahan Singh, Tech-I/SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Mahan Singh is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Mahan Singh fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Mahan Singh ex-parte.
(Samar Kar)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Mahan Singh, has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct)
Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as
amended from time to time.
(Samar Kar)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2 Shri Bhagirathi is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Bhagirathi fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Shri Bhagirathi ex-parte.
(Samar Kar)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Bhagirathi, has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct)
Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as
amended from time to time.
(Samar Kar)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2. Shri Abhishek Lanjiwar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Abhishek Lanjiwar fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para
2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Abhishek Lanjiwar ex-parte.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Abhishek Lanjiwar, has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Rajesh Kumar Verma, Loco Pilot (Stg.)/CCC/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehaviour on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Rajesh Kumar Verma is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Rajesh Kumar Verma fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
para 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Shri Rajesh Kumar Verma ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Rajesh Kumar Verma.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Rajesh Kumar Verma has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Swaroop singh Gawarna, Loco Pilot (G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehaviour on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Swaroop singh Gawarna is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as
he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to
the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Swaroop singh Gawarna fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to
be passed against Shri Swaroop singh Gawarna ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Swaroop singh Gawarna.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Swaroop singh Gawarna has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri G.Bhujang Rao, Loco Pilot (G)/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri G.Bhujang Rao is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri G.Bhujang Rao fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri G.Bhujang Rao ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 19.12.2015 while performing shunting duty (22:00 to 06:00 hrs) at PP Yard
with Loco No. 36032/WDS6/R, leading wheel set of rear most wagon no. SEC
22140938418 BOXNHL/E got derailed due to pushing excessively towards machine
shop siding line from sick line at about 02:30 hrs due to improper communication
between operating shunting staff over the Walkie-Talkie.
In this connection you were found gross negligence on your part while on duty. Why
disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Shri G.Bhujang Rao has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Devnath Yadav, Loco Pilot (Stg.-II )/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Devnath Yadav is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Devnath Yadav fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Devnath Yadav ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 01.01.2016 while performing shunting duty (06:00 to 14:00 hrs) at PP Yard
with Loco No. 36077/WDS6/R, leading trolley of rear most wagon no. SE 125791
BOXN/E got derailed after hitting of the dead end at about 11:30 hrs due to excessive
pushing while push back to Line No.4.
In this connection you were found gross negligence on your part while on duty. Why
disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Shri Devnath Yadav has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2. Shri Ashish Pawar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Ashish Pawar fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Ashish Pawar ex-parte.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Ashish Pawar, has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) & (xxi) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri K.N. Verma, LP(Goods)/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri K.N. Verma is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri K.N. Verma fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri K.N. Verma ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
In this connection you were found gross negligence on your part while on duty. Why
disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Shri K.N. Verma, LP has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri A.K. Yadav, LP(Goods)/Loco/BYT is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri A.K. Yadav is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri A.K. Yadav fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri A.K. Yadav ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
In this connection you were found gross negligence on your part while on duty. Why
disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Shri A.K. Yadav, LP has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Raj Kumar, LP(Goods)/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Raj Kumar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Raj Kumar fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Raj Kumar ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were failed to mention the VCD counter in loco repair book at the time of loco
taking over charge and handing over charge despite of repeated instructions on the
above subject.
In this connection you were found gross negligence on your part while on duty. Why
disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Shri Raj Kumar, LP has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2 Shri A.K. Nag is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri A.K. Nag fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri A.K. Nag ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were failed to mention the VCD counter in loco repair book at the time of loco
taking over charge and handing over charge despite of repeated instructions on the
above subject.
In this connection you were found gross negligence on your part while on duty. Why
disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Shri A.K. Nag, LP (M/Express) has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Ramesh Dewangan, , LP (Goods)/ Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Ramesh Dewangan is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Ramesh Dewangan fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para
2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Shri Ramesh Dewangan ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
This shows your gross negligence with respect to your duties.Why disciplinary action
should not be taken against you please explain.
By the above act of Shri Ramesh Dewangan, LP (Goods)/has failed in maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under
R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri N.K.Rai, Loco Pilot (P )/CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri N.K.Rai, Loco Pilot (P )is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as
he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to
the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri N.K.Rai, Loco Pilot (P )fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to
be passed against Shri N.K.Rai, Loco Pilot (P )ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri N.K.Rai, Loco Pilot (P ).
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
That Shri N.K.Rai, Loco Pilot (P) of CCC/Loco /R while functioning as LP(P) is
1
alleged to have committed misconduct in that, On date 20.04.2016 while performing
duty at NG/R you were held responsible for the derailment of NG Diesel Loco
No.226 ZDM4A/R of E/rake of 58711 at KM 828/9-10 in R-TBD section.
On date 20.04.2016 while performing duty at NG/R with Loco No. NG Diesel Loco
No.226 ZDM4A/R, of E/rake of 58711 ready at 06:00 hrs. from NG/R line no 1. At
06:24 hrs at KM 828/9-10 leading two wheel set of said loco got derailed and
blocked the line in R-TBD section. The derailment took place due to you have run
the train at excess speed i.e 15 KMPH instead of 10 KMPH which is maximum
permissible speed of the said section.
In this connection you were found gross negligence on your part while on duty. Why
disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Shri N.K.Rai, Loco Pilot (P ) has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Manoj Kumar, LP (Goods)/ Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Manoj Kumar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Manoj Kumar fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Manoj Kumar ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Manoj Kumar, LP (Goods)/ has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and
do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of
R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri D.K.Ramteke, SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. .Shri D.K.Ramteke is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri D.K.Ramteke fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri D.K.Ramteke ex-parte.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri D.K.Ramteke, has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) & (xxi) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri P.K.Singh, LP (M/Exp.)/ Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri P.K.Singh is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri P.K.Singh fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri P.K.Singh ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri P.K.Singh, LP (M/Exp.)/ has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Toran Lal Sahu, Sr.ALP /Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Toran Lal Sahu is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Toran Lal Sahu fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Toran Lal Sahu ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Toran Lal Sahu
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
That Shri Toran Lal Sahu, Sr.ALP of Loco/Raipur is alleged to have committed
1
misconduct in that, You were booked to work Train No. 12535 Exp from KTE to
Raipur on date 02-05-16. While working the said train with Loco No. 11505/LKO, as
per the data logger report, the speed of the train was recorded as 41.33 KMPH during
entering in NKJ yard “A” cabin turn out as there is a permanent speed restriction of
15 KMPH. Over speeding of trains may cause serious accident thereby great loss to
the Railways.
You were failed to alert the Loco Pilot about the over speeding of train which is a
very serious issue. This shows gross negligence on duty in your part.
Why disciplinary action should not be taken against you?
please explain.
By the above act of Shri Toran Lal Sahu, Sr.ALP has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri S.K.Patkar, CLI /Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri S.K.Patkar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri S.K.Patkar fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri S.K.Patkar ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
In this concern several time you were counseled by undersigned not to leave H.Q
without prior intimation. But you were failed to follow the instructions given.
This shows gross negligence on duty in your part.
By the above act of Shri S.K.Patkar, CLI has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Sujeet Kumar, LP(Goods)CCC /Loco/Raipur At BYT is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Sujeet Kumar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Sujeet Kumar fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Sujeet Kumar ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri Sujeet Kumar,
LP(Goods)Loco/Office/Raipur at BYT.
That Shri Sujeet Kumar, LP(G) of Loco/Raipur at BYT is alleged to have committed
1
misconduct in that On date 29-06-16, you had worked Train No. N/Box/E to RSD.
You were failed to blow whistle while approaching unmanned level crossing gate at
KM No. RSD-23 and RSD-32 between URK-RSD section. This is purely violation of
G.R. 4.50 and S.R. 4.50.02 duty of driver with respect to whistle codes and whistle
boards.
The same was noted during ambush check conducted by under signed. This shows
gross negligence on duty in your part.
.Why disciplinary action should not be taken against you?
please explain.
By the above act of Shri Sujeet Kumar, LP(Goods) has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Jitendra Kumar, ALP/CCC /Loco/Raipur At BYT is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Jitendra Kumar, is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Jitendra Kumar, fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2,
it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Shri Jitendra Kumar, ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
That Shri Jitendra Kumar, ALP of Loco/Raipur at BYT is alleged to have committed
1
misconduct in that, On date 29-06-16, you had worked Train No. N/Box/E to RSD.
You were failed to blow whistle while approaching unmanned level crossing gate at
KM No. RSD-23 and RSD-32 between URK-RSD section. This is purely violation of
G.R. 4.50 and S.R. 4.50.02 duty of driver with respect to whistle codes and whistle
boards.
The same was noted during ambush check conducted by under signed . This shows
gross negligence on duty in your part.
Why disciplinary action should not be taken against you?
please explain.
By the above act of Shri Jitendra Kumar,, ALP has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri R.K.Pandey, SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehaviour on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. . Shri R.K.Pandey is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri R.K.Pandey fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri R.K.Pandey ex-parte.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri R.K.Pandey, has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) & (xxi) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Ramanuj Singh, LP(Goods)/CCC /Loco/Raipur (DPC/R) is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Ramanuj Singh, is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Ramanuj Singh, fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Ramanuj Singh, ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Ramanuj Singh, has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2. . Shri B.D.Basak,is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri B.D.Basak,fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Shri B.D.Basak,ex-parte.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri B.D.Basak, has failed to maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct)
Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered herself liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as
amended from time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri G.C.Biswas, CLI /Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri G.C.Biswas is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri G.C.Biswas fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri G.C.Biswas ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri G.C.Biswas, CLI has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Anil Kumar Nayak, Loco Pilot (Shunter )/CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Anil Kumar Nayak, is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Anil Kumar Nayak, fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para
2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Shri Anil Kumar Nayak ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Anil Kumar Nayak..
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
1. Shri Anil Kumar Nayak, Loco Pilot (Shunter) / CCC/Loco/ office, Raipur
2. . Sr.D.S.O/R for information in reference to your letter no. Safety /R/Accident case/8/RSD /676
Dated 27.07.2016.
3 Sr.DME(C&W)/Safety section for information.
5. CCC/Loco/Raipur.
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri Anil Kumar Nayak, Loco Pilot
(Shunter), /CCC/Loco/ Office/Raipur.
That Shri Anil Kumar Nayak, Loco Pilot (Shunter) of CCC/Loco /R while
1
functioning as LP(Shunter) is alleged to have committed misconduct in that, On date
11.07.2016 while performing duty at RSD/R you were held responsible for the
derailment of Diesel Loco No.36059 WDS6/R over the DS point no.54B of RSD
yard at km RSD/55 at about 21:30hrs.
On date 11.07..2016 while performing duty at RSD/R with Diesel Loco No.36059
WDS6/R, you were overlook the signal and started the engine and got inserted in
opened DS point. Resulting said loco got derailed. The derailment took place due to
overlooking of the signal and started the engine by you.
In this connection gross negligence found on your part while on duty. Why
disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Shri Anil Kumar Nayak has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri G.C.Biswas, CLI /Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri G.C.Biswas is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri G.C.Biswas fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri G.C.Biswas ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri G.C.Biswas, CLI has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Sanjay Kumar, CLI /Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Sanjay Kumar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Sanjay Kumar fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Sanjay Kumar ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
This shows gross negligence on duty in your part i.e. you failed to proper counseling
of running staff.
By the above act of Shri Sanjay Kumar, CLI has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri B.K.Soni, Loco pilot, CCC /Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri B.K.Soni is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri B.K.Soni fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will be
presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against
Shri Shri B.K.Soni ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri B.K.Soni, Loco Pilot has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Ratan Kumar, Asst.Loco pilot, CCC /Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Ratan Kumar is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Ratan Kumar fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Ratan Kumar ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Ratan Kumar, Loco Pilot has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Satish Kumar Verma,Asst.Loco pilot, CCC /Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Sri Satish Kumar Verma is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Satish Kumar Verma fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para
2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Satish Kumar Verma ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Satish Kumar Verma.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
1
That Shri Satish Kumar Verma, ALP of Loco/Raipur is alleged to have
committed misconduct in that On date 18.08.16, you were booked for shunting
service at Raipur yard for the shift 22:00 to 06:00 hrs and Lobby In-charge had
served call book to you. You refused to accept the said Shunting T.O. and
asked to mark PR. Refusal of T.O. on call book is a serious misconduct and
you also not obeyed the instructions of Crew Controller in this regard.
This shows gross negligence on duty in your part.
Why disciplinary action should not be taken against you?
please explain.
By the above act of Shri Satish Kumar Verma, ALP has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Md.Kasim, Loco Pilot (Goods) of CCC/Loco /R is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Md.Kasim is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may wish
to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Md.Kasim fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Md.Kasim ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Md.Kasim, LP (Goods) has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing
unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri H.K.Sahu, Loco Pilot (Goods) of CCC/Loco /R is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri H.K.Sahu is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may wish to
make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned
within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri H.K.Sahu fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will
be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri H.K.Sahu ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri H.K.Sahu, LP (Goods) has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R
S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Ramanuj Singh , Loco Pilot (Goods) of CCC/Loco /R/ DPC is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2 Shri Ramanuj Singh is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Ramanuj Singh fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it
will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed
against Shri Ramanuj Singh ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri Ramanuj Singh, LP (Goods)/ DPC/Raipur has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri B.J.P.Soni, Loco Pilot (Goods) /BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri B.J.P.Soni, Loco Pilot (Goods) /BMY is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri B.J.P.Soni, Loco Pilot (Goods) /BMY fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri B.J.P.Soni, Loco Pilot (Goods) /BMY ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri B.J.P.Soni, Loco Pilot
(Goods) /BMY
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 19-10-16, you were booked for Extra shunting at PP Yard shift duty from
1
22:00 to 06:00 hrs. According to the program given by the on duty Yard Master, you
have to sort out sick/fit wagons from sick line with shunting engine no. 36058 .
While attaching the wagons on sick line for drawn out, excess push was given by you
during coupling of wagons. As a result of the excess push, the rear most wagons no.
SR 12060611775 BOXN were rolled down and got derailed after climbing over the
dead end.
In this connection gross negligence found on your part while on duty. Why
disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Shri B.J.P.Soni, Loco Pilot (Goods) /BMY has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Shri P.Patel, ALP/CCC/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Shri P.Patel, ALP/CCC/Loco/Raipur ex-parte.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Shri P.Patel, Asst. Loco Pilot,CCC/Loco/Raipur has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri A.B.Bhattacharjee, Loco Pilot
(Pass)/CCC/Loco/Raipu
By the above act of Shri A.B.Bhattacharjee, Loco Pilot (Pass)/CCC/Loco/Raipu has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened
the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable
for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Santosh Kumar Patkar, CLI/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Santosh Kumar Patkar, CLI/Loco/DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Santosh Kumar Patkar, CLI/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Santosh Kumar Patkar, CLI/Loco/DRZ ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Santosh Kumar Patkar,
CLI/Loco/DRZ.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
while on duty. Why disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Shri Santosh Kumar Patkar, CLI/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G)- 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Shri Amitabh Chaudhry (Design) Sr.Section Engineer (Office in which working) Sr.DME/R is
hereby informed, that the President/Railway Board/Undersigned propose (s) to take action against
him under Rule II of the Railway servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rule, 1968. A statement of the
imputation of the misconduct of misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned
above, is shown in the over leaf.
2. Sri Shri Amitabh Chaudhry is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may
wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any should be submitted to undersigned
(through proper channel) so as to reach to the said undersigned within 10 days of receipt of this
memorandum.
3. If Sri Shri Amitabh Chaudhry is fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
Para – 2, it will be presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Shri Amitabh Chaudhry ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Shri Amitabh Chaudhry (By
order and in the name of the President).
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
To,
Name: Sri Shri Amitabh Chaudhry
Design: Sr.Section Engineer
Office: - Sr.DME/Raipur
Copy to: - Dy. CVO (T) /BSP for kind information please, in reference to letter No.
SECRV/T/MKS/515305/2669-70/03 Dated: 23.12.2016
________________________________________________________________________________
See rule 1702 (ii)-RI in terms of which this memorandum can be issued by any authority competent to impose any of the penalties on the Railway servant.
Strike out which is not applicable.
(2)
Statement of allegation on the basis of which disciplinary action is being taken Shri Amitabh
Chaudhry, Design: - Sr.Section Engineer of Sr.DME/Raipur Office.
Shri Amitabh Chaudhry while working as SSE/C&W/R during the month of July’15 had committed the
following irregularities:-
Testing cum calibration by test wagon of EIMWB/RSD was done on Dtd. 17.07.2015. During testing,
weighment found beyond permissible limit, accordingly weigh bridge was got calibrated by opening
seal. Shri Amitabh Chaudhry, SSE/C&W/R was present during the above testing as a representative of
Mechanical Department.
As per Railway Board’s Lt. No.: 92/Dev Cell/IDEI/2/Vol Dtd. 16.11.2004 & Lt No.:
2004/Dev.Cell/IDEL/3 Dtd. 10.09.2012, whenever any major break-down is attended involving part(s)
of weighbridge sealed by weights & measures department, the weighbridge should invariably be got
rectified and restamped from the weights & measures department. It is also directed that Railways
should strictly follow the above guidelines for the purpose of calibration of weighbridges from weight &
Measures department.
However, in the instant case, re-stamping of the weigh bridge by weight & Measure Department was not
ensured. Even Shri Chaudhry had not intimated about the calibration of the weigh bridge to this higher
authority and simply intimated to Mechanical control that the EIMWB has been tested and found OK.
Due to the lapse on the part of Shri Amitabh Chaudhry, the EIMWB remained unstamped and
weighment was continued till vigilance check.
By the above act of omission and commission; Shri Amitabh Chaudhry, SSE/C&W/R had exhibited lack
of devotion to duty, thereby contravening Rule 3.1 (ii) Railway services (Conduct) Rules 1966, thereby
rendered himself liable for disciplinary action under Railway Servant (D&A) rules, 1968 as amended
time to time.
Name: B.Sinku
Design: Sr.DME(C&W.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
_____________________________________________________________________________________
Note: - The allegation should Indicate how exactly the Railway servant concerned is culpable i.e. What exactly his responsibility was in a particular case and
how he failed to discharge it.
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Purnendra Kumar, Loco Pilot (Stg.)/Loco /DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Purnendra Kumar, Loco Pilot (Stg.) /Loco/DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make
such representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Purnendra Kumar, Loco Pilot (Stg.) /Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation
within the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to
make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Purnendra Kumar, Loco Pilot (Stg.)
/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
5. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Purnendra Kumar, Loco
Pilot (Stg.) /Loco/DRZ.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 18-12-16, you were booked to perform shunting duty at 18:50 Hrs at DRZ yard.
1
During your duty you had not adopted correct procedure of cab changing of Loco No.
70319/WDG4/R at DRZ yard resulted in rolling down of said Locomotive and got derailed
at DS Point No. 37/B. Even after repeated counseling and training given on the procedure of
cab changing on CCB locos, you were failed to adopt correct and safe procedure of cab
changing due to which derailment of said loco. This shows gross negligence on duty in your
part.
Why disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
By the above act of Sri Purnendra Kumar, Loco Pilot (Stg.) /Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(R.V.Ranga Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Smt.Anjali Tiwari, Sr.Clerk Working under SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
On date 15.01.2017 during the final rehearsal for cultural program, you failed to obey
1
the instructions of DRM/R in connection with preparation of a few duet songs to be
sung with General Manager during a get-together function organized on 16-01-17.
During the said program on 16-01-17, when General Manager/SECR expressed his
desire to sing one particular song, you flatly refused to sing the duet song saying not
come with preparation to sing the song. You, being an employee appointed under
cultural quota cannot supposed to refuse to perform when clear instructions in
advance were given by DRM/R.
This shows your irresponsible attitude towards work and DRM/R had taken a serious
view of the above incident.
You thus committed gross misconduct and failed to maintain absolute devotion
towards your duty.
Why disciplinary action should not be taken against you please explain
(R.Ranga Rao)
Design: .DME/BIA
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Santosh Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Loco /BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Santosh Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Loco /BIA is hereby given an opportunity to make
such representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Santosh Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Loco /BIA fails to submit his representation within
the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Santosh Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Loco /BIA
ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Santosh Kumar, Loco Pilot
(Goods)/Loco /BIA
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 11.04.17 while working train no SL-403 from ExYd –AWZ section with Loco
1
No.:- 12365 WDG-4/R, you had made shutdown the said loco at AWZ Yard at 12.30 hrs.
The loco was failed at AWZ by the outgoing crew on 12.04.17 made TR and attended at
DLS/R. As per the inquiry report conducted by Shri P.K.Patel CLI/BIA, it was found that
heavy lube oil leakage noted from flexible pipe near MCB governor. It was noted that lube
oil was leaking in entire section and you failed to note the leakage either in section or at
AWZ yard while shutting down of the locomotive. The failure was occurred due to lack of
alertness. This shows gross negligence on duty in your part.
By the above act of Sri Santosh Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Loco /BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Sri Chetan Kumar, CCC/Loco/DRZ
On date 11-05-17, Train No. DBC-156 of TO Dep: 23:30 hrs was badly detained at DRZ
due to mismanagement at Lobby. Two Loco Pilots were available in roster at 21:00 hrs,
00:10 hrs respectively, but the lobby staff had not booked them for the said TO. The
booking clerk has also served a Loco Serial to DPC/R demanding balancing crew from
BMY even after sufficient crew is available in roster. Due to your mismanagement, train
movement was badly affected in the circuit and resulting in wastage of manpower. As a
CCC, it is the primary responsibility to ensure maximum utilization of crew working
under your control.
On date 11-05-17, while performing Booking clerk duty at DRZ lobby in 14-22 hours
shift, you had failed to book crew for one Goods TO. Two Loco Pilots were available in
roster at 21:00 hrs and 00:10 hrs respectively. But you had not booked them for Train No:
DBC-156 of TO time: 23:30 hrs and served a Loco serial to DPC/R for arranging crew
from BMY lobby (Balancing duty). You had not informed the matter to CCC/Loco/DRZ
and a Goods train was detained at DRZ even after sufficient crew were available on
roster. Due to your mismanagement, train movement was affected badly in the circuit.
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri K.K.Raj, Asst.Loco Pilot/Loco /BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri K.K.Raj, Asst.Loco Pilot/Loco /BIA is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri K.K.Raj, Asst.Loco Pilot/Loco /BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri K.K.Raj, Asst.Loco Pilot/Loco /BIA ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 11.04.17 while working train no SL-403 from ExYd –AWZ section with Loco No.:-
1
12365 WDG-4/R, you had made shutdown the said loco at AWZ Yard at 12.30 hrs. The loco
was failed at AWZ by the outgoing crew on 12.04.17 made TR and attended at DLS/R. As
per the inquiry report conducted by Shri P.K.Patel CLI/BIA, it was found that heavy lube oil
leakage noted from flexible pipe near MCB governor. It was noted that lube oil was leaking
in entire section and you failed to note the leakage either in section or at AWZ yard while
shutting down of the locomotive. The failure was occurred due to lack of alertness. This
shows gross negligence on duty in your part.
By the above act of Sri K.K.Raj, Asst.Loco Pilot/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under
R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Chetan Kumar, CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Chetan Kumar, CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Chetan Kumar, CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 11-05-17, Train No. DBC-156 of TO Dep: 23:30 hrs was badly detained from
1
23.30 to 02.05 hrs. at DRZ due to mismanagement. Two Loco Pilots were available in roster
at 21:00 hrs and 00:10 hrs respectively, but you they were not booked for the said TO. The
booking clerk has also served a Loco Serial to DPC/R demanding balancing crew from BMY
even after two set crew were available in roster. Due to your mismanagement, Train No:
DBC-156 detained for 2:35 hours at DRZ. As a CCC, it is the primary responsibility to
ensure maximum utilization of crew working under your control. You have to serve TO on
First In First Out basis, but you have failed to do so. It is your clear cut negligence on
working.
Why disciplinary action should not be taken against you?
By the above act of Sri Chetan Kumar, CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under
R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Mahesh Singh, Tech-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Mahesh Singh, Tech-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Mahesh Singh, Tech-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
4 The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Mahesh Singh, Tech-
I /CCC/Loco/DRZ.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 11-05-17, while performing Booking clerk duty at DRZ lobby in 14-22 hours
1
shift, you had failed to book crew for one Goods Train No. DBC-156 resulting train
detained at DRZ from 23:30 to 02:05 hrs at DRZ due to non-availability of crew whereas
two crew were available in roster at 21:00 hrs and 00:10 hrs respectively. Without booking
them, you had given a Loco Serial to DPC for balancing crew from BMY. This is clear cut
negligence on your part as you have to book crew on First In First Out basis for given TO,
but you have failed to do so. It is your clear cut negligence on working.
By the above act of Sri Mahesh Singh, Tech-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/ DURG is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/ DURG is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/ DURG fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/ DURG ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/
DURG.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri A.Ravi Shekhar,
SSE/C&W/ DURG.
Why disciplinary action should not be taken against you? Please explain.
By the above act of Sri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/ DURG. has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri D.Ramteke, SSE/C&W/ DURG is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri D.Ramteke, SSE/C&W/ DURG is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation
as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be
submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri D.Ramteke, SSE/C&W/ DURG fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri D.Ramteke, SSE/C&W/ DURG ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Why disciplinary action should not be taken against you? Please explain.
By the above act of Sri D.Ramteke, SSE/C&W/ DURG. has failed in maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under
R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri R.K.Pathak, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri R.K.Pathak, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CDPC/Raipur, on date 10.06.17, you were booked for TO Dep:
1
07:00 hrs, Train No. N/BSPC. You had taken the charge of Train No: N/BSPC at MNDH at
09:15 hrs, MNDH dep: 09:45 hrs, arrived at Coal Load Yard at 11:50 hrs, load had been
placed and MDLE departure at 12:45 hrs, arrived Exchange yard at 13:10 hrs.
At Exchange Yard, you were advised to made EOT on Train no. FD/KLMG for push
back the said train from south grid line number - 6 to north grid Line number – 12. But you
had refused to work.
You had also not obey the advice of Section Controller and and on duty DPC. Finally
you had refused to work even though a LI had been offered to you for accompanying during
shunting. Your total duty hours from Sign On to Sign Off is only 06 hours 40 minutes. The
said train was detained for 03:00 hours at Exchange yard due to your refusal to work.
Sri D.Mandal, CLI/R was deputed to investigate the matter. As per report of LI, you
have refused to work even LI was being provided to you.
By the above act of Sri R.K.Pathak, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R has failed in maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under
R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within
the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu,
LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 11-05-17, Train No. DBC-156 of TO Dep: 23:30 hrs was badly detained
1
from 23.30 to 02.05 hrs (02:35 hrs) at DRZ for crew. On date 11-05-17, you made Sign OFF
at 04:30 hrs at DRZ lobby and available for train services at 20:30 hrs. On enquiry it was
came notice that you were not at your HQ i.e. DRZ. Due to this, one set of crew had been
booked from BMY lobby for balancing at DRZ. As per your written statement, you left DRZ
without taking any permission. You are wholly responsible for the detention of the said train.
By the above act of Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri D.K.Murli, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri D.K.Murli, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 11-05-17, Train No. DBC-156 of TO Dep: 23:30 hrs was badly detained
1
from 23.30 to 02.05 hrs (02:35 hrs) at DRZ for crew. On date 10-05-17, you made Sign OFF
at 17:5 0 hrs at DRZ lobby, availed 30 hours rest and available for train services at 23:50 hrs.
On enquiry it was came notice that you were not at your HQ i.e. DRZ. Due to this, one set of
crew had been booked from BMY lobby for balancing at DRZ. As per your written
statement, you left DRZ without taking any permission. You are wholly responsible for the
detention of the said train.
By the above act of Sri D.K.Murli, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Ashok Gupta/ALP/CCC/Loco/BMY fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Ashok Gupta/ALP/CCC/Loco/BMY ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 08.07.17, you have booked for worked D/LE No 70501,WDG 4/R, while
1
proceeding to fueling point the Loco got derailed on hand point No L/5 at Loco yard/ BMY
on 08.07.17 at 19.18 hrs. the said derailment was occurred due to you had allowed to move
the Loco over the point without ensuring correct route setting . As the point was not settled
correctly, no route condition takes place. which leads to derailment of said Loco. you were
held responsible for the derailment.
By the above act of Sri Ashok Gupta/ALP/CCC/Loco/BMY has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Manash Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Manash Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Manash Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Manash Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/BIA ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Manash Kumar Sharma,
SSE/C&W/BIA.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Sri Manash Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Santosh Kumar Patkar, CLI/CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Santosh Kumar Patkar, CLI/CCC/Loco/R is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Santosh Kumar Patkar, CLI/CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Santosh Kumar Patkar, CLI/CCC/Loco/R ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Santosh Kumar Patkar,
CLI/CCC/Loco/R.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 23.08.2017, you had reported the footplate inspection details to on duty
1
DPC/R at 02:35 hrs that on date 22-08-17 you had conducted footplate inspection on Train
No. N/BSPC with Sri A.K.Dewangan, LPG/R and Sri Satish Kumar, ALP/R from MNDH to
BMY. As per your report, the train departure from MNDH at 18:05 hrs and arrived MNDH
at 23:55 hrs.
On cross checking it was noticed that you were not in the engine of Train No.
N/BSPC from MNDH to BMY which shows false reporting and thereby gross negligence .
Moreover clear instructions have been issued to all CLIs to report to on duty DPC/R
before departure of train on which you are going to conduct footplate inspection and also to
inform the arrival at destination. This shows that gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Santosh Kumar Patkar, CLI/CCC/Loco/R has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri J.P.Sharma, SSE/C&W/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri J.P.Sharma, SSE/C&W/BMY fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri J.P.Sharma, SSE/C&W/BMY ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annex
ure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri J.P.Sharma,
SSE/C&W/BMY.
By the above act of Sri J.P.Sharma, SSE/C&W/BMY has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and
do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of
R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri D.K.Murli, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri D.K.Murli, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri D.K.Murli, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri D.K.Murli,
LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
On date 03-09--17, you were booked for TO Dep. 17:30 hrs, Train No. DBC-112.
1
After placement of the said train in the BSPC siding, you had worked Train No. BDC-118
with Loco No. 70576/WDG4/R departure from MXA at 02:40 hrs and arrived DRZ at 04:25
hrs. On scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the said loco, it was observed that you had
run the train at 63.1 kmph speed in the section where as the maximum permissible speed of
the rolling stock is 60 kmph. You had run the train at excess speed which is unsafe working
and violation of rules. Over speeding of the rolling stock may lead to derailment/accident.
By the above act of Sri D.K.Murli, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri V.K.Nagvansih,
LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
On date 02-09-17, you were booked for TO Dep. 20:00 hrs, Train No. DBC-109.
1
After placement of the said train in the BSPC siding, you had worked Train No. BDC-114
with Loco No. 70576/WDG4/R departure from MXA at 01:45 hrs and arrived DRZ at 03:20
hrs. On scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the said loco, it was observed that you had
run the train at 66.1 kmph speed in the section where as the maximum permissible speed of
the rolling stock is 60 kmph. You had run the train at excess speed which is unsafe working
and violation of rules. Over speeding of the rolling stock may lead to derailment/accident.
By the above act of Sri V.K.Nagvansih, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Naresh, LPS-II/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Naresh, LPS-II/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Naresh, LPS-II/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Naresh,
LPS-II/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
On date 05-09-17, you were booked for yard shunting at DRZ from 18:00 to 02:00
1
hrs. You had taken the charge of Train No. BDC-126 with Loco No. 12496/R at 18:30 hrs on
line no.2 at DRZ yard. During the joint inspection conducted by CCC(Loco)/DRZ and
CLI/DRZ, it was found that you are sleeping in rest room of lobby leaving the loco
unmanned on running line in yard.
As per the joint inspection report, you had violated G & SR 4.61 i.e. leaving the
working locomotive unmanned when on duty on running line in station. You were also
found sleeping on duty by violating the conduct rules.
The unmanned loco in running line may lead to roll down as the DRZ yard is situated
in severe falling gradient which is unsafe working and violation of rules.
By the above act of Sri Naresh, LPS-II/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri V.Ramesh, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri V.Ramesh, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri V.Ramesh, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri V.Ramesh,
LPS-I/CCC/Loco/BIA.
On date 01-09--17, you had performed shunting duty at DURG yard with Loco No.
1
16184/WDM3A/R in the 06 – 14 hrs shift. On scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the
said loco, it was observed that you had run the loco at 21 kmph speed during shunting where
as the maximum permissible speed for shunting at Durg yard is 15 kmph. You had run the
loco at excess speed which is unsafe working and violation of rules. Over speeding during
shunting movement may lead to derailment/accident.
By the above act of Sri V.Ramesh, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri T.K.Thakur, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri T.K.Thakur, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 23-08-17, you had performed shunting duty at DURG yard with Loco No.
1
16184/WDM3A/R in the 14 - 22 hrs shift. On scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the
said loco, it was observed that you had the run loco at 19 kmph speed during shunting where
as the maximum permissible speed for shunting at Durg yard is 15 kmph. You had run the
loco at excess speed which is unsafe working and violation of rules. Over speeding during
shunting movement may lead to derailment/accident. Again on 26-08-17, during 14 – 22
hours shift you had run at excess speed.
By the above act of Sri T.K.Thakur, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 22-08-17, you had performed shunting duty at DURG yard with Loco No.
1
16184/WDM3A/R in the 06 – 14 hrs shift. On scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the
said loco , it was observed that you had run the loco at 30 kmph speed during shunting where
as the maximum permissible speed for shunting at Durg yard is 15 kmph. You had run the
loco at excess speed which is unsafe working and violation of rules. Over speeding during
shunting movement may lead to derailment/accident.
By the above act of Sri R.K.Deshmukh, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri S.K.Verma, LPS/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri S.K.Verma, LPS/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri S.K.Verma, LPS/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 10-09-17, you had performed shunting duty at PP yard/BIA with Loco No.
1
16164/WDM3A/R in the 14 - 22 hrs shift. As per report of data of Speed Recorder of the
said loco by DLS/R, it was observed that you had the run loco at 21 kmph speed during
shunting where as the maximum permissible speed for shunting at PP Yard/BIA is 15 kmph.
You had run the loco at excess speed which is unsafe working and violation of rules. Over
speeding during shunting movement may lead to derailment/accident.
By the above act of Sri S.K.Verma, LPS/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Jamil Khan, LP(Mail/Exp)/CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Jamil Khan, LP(Mail/Exp)/CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Jamil Khan, LP(Mail/Exp)/CCC/Loco/R ex-
parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Jamil Khan,
LP(Mail/Exp)/CCC/Loco/R.
On date 13-09-17, you had worked Train No. 18208 from Bilaspur to Durg with
1
Loco No. 16181+18927/R. As per report of data of Speed Recorder of the said loco by
DLS/R, it was observed that you had failed to conduct Brake Power test after starting from
Bilaspur station. Clear instructions have been issued to you to conduct brake feel test and
brake power test after starting from originating station / crew changing station as a part of
the preventive measures to curb SPAD. You had failed to follow the instructions given by
the Railway administration.
By the above act of Sri Jamil Khan, LP(Mail/Exp)/CCC/Loco/R has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri Kumar Anish, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Kumar Anish, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Kumar Anish, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Kumar Anish,
ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
On date 18-09-17, you were booked for DRZ yard shunting of TO Dep. 05:30 hrs.
1
You had performed shunting duty at DRZ yard with Loco No. 12401/WDG4/R from 05:30
hrs to 13:30 hrs. As per report of data of Speed Recorder of the said loco by DLS/R, it was
observed that you had the run loco at 24.7 kmph speed during shunting where as the
maximum permissible speed for shunting at DRZ yard is 15 kmph. You had run the loco at
excess speed which is unsafe working and violation of rules. Over speeding during shunting
movement may lead to derailment/accident.
By the above act of Sri Kumar Anish, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri R.K.Singh, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri R.K.Singh, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri R.K.Singh, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri R.K.Singh,
LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R.
On date 07-07-17, you had worked Train No. RSD STL with Loco No.
1
13148/Raipur. During working at RSD yard at 02:28 hrs, VCD got operated on run at a
speed of 4.8 kmph. You had put remark in log book that “VCD counter increased during
check”. This is an inappropriate remark.
You failed to acknowledge the VCD as per the stipulated time set in the locomotive
resulted in operation of VCD which is a unsafe practice during working of trains.
Instructions regarding working VCD has been issued to you several times. But you had
failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
By the above act of Sri R.K.Singh, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri M.L.Chandrakar,
LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R.
On date 06-07-17, you had worked Train No. LE with Loco No. 16426/Raipur.
1
During working at Raipur station at 19:45 hrs, VCD got operated on run at a speed of 1.3
kmph. You had put remark in log book that “For testing”. This is an inappropriate remark.
You failed to acknowledge the VCD as per the stipulated time set in the locomotive
resulted in operation of VCD which is a unsafe practice during working of trains.
Instructions regarding working VCD has been issued to you several times. But you had
failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
By the above act of Sri M.L.Chandrakar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Arun Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Arun Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Arun Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Arun Kumar, LP(G)/
CCC/Loco/BIA.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Arun Kumar,
LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA.
On date 25-07-17, you had worked Train No. N/JCW with Loco No. 12500/Raipur.
1
During working between UP Through to JCW section at 11:29 hrs, VCD got operated on run
at a speed of 6.7 kmph. You had put remark in log book that “During N/Box empty banking
working”. This is an inappropriate remark.
You failed to acknowledge the VCD as per the stipulated time set in the locomotive
resulted in operation of VCD which is a unsafe practice during working of trains.
Instructions regarding working VCD has been issued to you several times. But you had
failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
By the above act of Sri Arun Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri D.K.Verma, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri D.K.Verma, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri D.K.Verma,
LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA.
On date 17-09-17, you had performed shunting duty at PP yard/BIA with Loco No.
1
13574/WDG3A/R in the 22-06 hrs shift. On scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the
said loco done by DLS/Raipur, it was observed that you had run the loco at 21 kmph speed
during shunting where as the maximum permissible speed for shunting at PP yard/BIA is 15
kmph.
You had run the loco at excess speed which is unsafe working and violation of rules.
Over speeding during shunting movement may lead to derailment/accident.
By the above act of Sri D.K.Verma, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri S.L.Kashyap, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri S.L.Kashyap, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri S.L.Kashyap,
LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
On date 04-10-17, you had worked Train No. BDC-119 with Loco No.
1
70002/WDG4/R departure from MXA at 06:05 hrs and arrived DRZ at 09:10 hrs. On
scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the said loco by DLS/R, it was observed that you
had run the train at 64 kmph speed in the section where as the maximum permissible speed
of the rolling stock (Load) is 60 kmph. You had run the train at excess speed which is unsafe
working and violation of rules. Over speeding of the rolling stock may lead to
derailment/accident.
By the above act of Sri S.L.Kashyap, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri R.K.Sahare, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri R.K.Sahare, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri R.K.Sahare,
LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
On date 05-10-17, you had worked Train No. DBC-120 with Loco No.
1
70002/WDG4/R departure from DRZ at 02:45 hrs and arrived MXA at 05:00 hrs. On
scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the said loco by DLS/R, it was observed that you
had run the train at 54 kmph speed in the section where as the maximum permissible speed
of the rolling stock (Load) is 50 kmph. On the same day you had worked Train No. BDC-
124 with Loco No. 70002/WDG4/R departure from MXA at 07:30 hrs and arrived DRZ at
08:55 hrs. On scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the said loco by DLS/R, it was
observed that you had run the train at 65 kmph speed in the section where as the maximum
permissible speed of the rolling stock (Empty) is 60 kmph.
With this it is clear that you were habituated to run the train at excess speed which is
unsafe working and violation of rules. Over speeding of the rolling stock may lead to
derailment/accident.
By the above act of Sri R.K.Sahare, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri M.L.Sinha, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri M.L.Sinha, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri M.L.Sinha, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri M.L.Sinha,
LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
On date 05.10.17, you had worked Train No. DBC-122 with Loco No.
1
70002/WDG4/R departure from DRZ at 14:30 hrs and arrived MXA at 17:25 hrs. On
scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the said loco by DLS/R, it was observed that you
had run the train at 55 kmph speed in the section where as the maximum permissible speed
of the rolling stock (Load) is 50 kmph. You had run the train at excess speed which is unsafe
working and violation of rules. Over speeding of the rolling stock may lead to
derailment/accident.
By the above act of Sri M.L.Sinha, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Anil Maharwade, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Anil Maharwade, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Anil Maharwade, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Anil Maharwade, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Rajesh Kumar, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Rajesh Kumar, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Rajesh Kumar, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Rajesh Kumar,
LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
On date 08-10-17, you were booked for DRZ yard shunting of TO Dep. 01:30 hrs.
1
You had performed shunting duty at DRZ yard with Loco No. 70002/WDG4/R from 01:30
hrs to 13:30 hrs. On scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the said loco by DLS/R, it
was observed that you had the run loco at 23 kmph speed during shunting where as the
maximum permissible speed for shunting at DRZ yard is 15 kmph. You had run the loco at
excess speed which is unsafe working and violation of rules. Over speeding during shunting
movement may lead to derailment/accident.
By the above act of Sri Rajesh Kumar, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri P.K.Tandon, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri P.K.Tandon, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri P.K.Tandon,
LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
On date 09-10-17, you had worked Train No. DBC-142 from DRZ to MXA with Loco
1
No. 70002/R. On scrutinizing the data of Speed Recorder of the said loco by DLS/R, it was
observed that you had failed to conduct Brake Power test after starting from Dallirajhara
station. Clear instructions have been issued to you to conduct brake feel test and brake power
test after starting from originating station / crew changing station as a part of the preventive
measures to curb SPAD. You had failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway
administration.
By the above act of Sri P.K.Tandon, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take action
against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable
to be passed against Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT has failed in maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Harish Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Harish Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Harish Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Harish Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Dharmendra Kumar, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri A.K.Mehata, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri A.K.Mehata, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri A.K.Mehata, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri R.K.Dewangan, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri P.K.Verma, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri P.K.Verma, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri P.K.Verma, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Bhupesh Kumar Soni, (LPG)/CCC/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Bhupesh Kumar Soni,
(LPG)/CCC/Loco/Raipur.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Bhupesh Kumar Soni,
(LPG)/CCC/Loco/Raipur.
On date 20-11-17, you had been booked for TO 23:00 hrs, Train No. N/MBPB with
1
Loco No. 70081+70461/WDG3A/VSKP. Train departure from RSD at 23:55 hrs, placed in
MBPB siding at 02:50 hrs at BKTH. After placement of train in siding, you were waiting for
program from 02:50 hrs to 04:15 hrs inside the siding. A Railway Board JPO has been issued
from this office to shutdown the locos at stations/yards if detention is more 30 minutes to
save HSD oil. Neither you have followed the instructions mentioned in the Railway Board
JPO nor informed to DPC regarding not shutting down of Locos in two spells i.e. from 02:50
to 04:15 hrs and from 07:30 to 09:30 hrs.
This shows gross negligence on duty in your part.
By the above act of Sri Bhupesh Kumar Soni, (LPG)/CCC/Loco/Raipur has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Sarwajeet Yadav, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BMY fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Sarwajeet Yadav, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BMY ex-
parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Sarwajeet Yadav, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BMY has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Surendra Prasad, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/Raipur has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP
CCC/LOCO/Bhilai.
(Sakya Acharya)
Design: DME/Bhilai
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Sakya Acharya)
Design: DME/Bhilai
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP
CCC/LOCO/Bhilai.
(Sakya Acharya)
Design: DME/Bhilai
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Vivek Singh, Sr
ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai.
On date 01.12.17, you had performed shunting duty at PP yard (Extra) in the 06-14 hrs
1
shift. During push back in shunting NECK-2 of Coal EMPTY Yard (East)/PP Yard, 5
NBOXHL wagons (8th, 9th, 10th, 11th & 12 th) got derailed at 08:25hrs on 01-12-17. As per
the joint enquiry report and Safety department note, the derailment occurred due to excess
push given by you even communication break occurred during backing of train in sick line.
You failed to stop the movement even after you had not received any communication from
shunting staff on rear of the train.
By the above act of Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Sakya Acharya)
Design: DME/Bhilai
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri T.Ramana Rao, CCC/LOCO/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri T.Ramana Rao, CCC/LOCO/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri T.Ramana Rao, CCC/LOCO/DRZ ex-parte.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri T.Ramana Rao, CCC/LOCO/DRZ has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(M.R.Yadav)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F.)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
2. Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP
CCC/LOCO/Bhilai.
(Sakya Acharya)
Design: DME/Bhilai
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Vivek Singh, Sr ALP CCC/LOCO/Bhilai has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Sakya Acharya)
Design: DME/Bhilai
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri V.R.Ravi, LPG(G)/ CCC/
LOCO/Raipur.
(Sakya Acharya)
Design: DME/Bhilai
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri V.R.Ravi, LPG(G)/CCC/LOCO/Raipur has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Sakya Acharya)
Design: DME/Bhilai
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
(Sakya Acharya)
Design: DME/Bhilai
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri D.Dileshwar Rao, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/Bhilai has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Sakya Acharya)
Design: DME/Bhilai
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
(Devi Singh)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri A.K.Dhruw, LP(S)/CCC/LOCO/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Devi Singh)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Mahesh Budhe, LP(S)/CCC/LOCO/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Mahesh Budhe, LP(S)/CCC/LOCO/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Mahesh Budhe, LP(S)/CCC/LOCO/DRZ ex-
parte.
(Devi Singh)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Mahesh Budhe, LP(S)/CCC/LOCO/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Devi Singh)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Shailesh Kumar Verma,
LP(S)-II/CCC/LOCO/BIA.
(Devi Singh)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Shailesh Kumar Verma, LP(S)-II/CCC/LOCO/BIA has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time.
(Devi Singh)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(Devi Singh)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
You failed to acknowledge the VCD as per the stipulated time set in the locomotive
resulted in operation of VCD which is an unsafe practice during working of trains.
Instructions regarding working VCD has been issued to you several times. But you had
failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
By the above act of Sri Bhishm Narayan, LP(Goods)/CCC/LOCO/R has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Devi Singh)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Sanjay Kumar, LPG/CCC/LOCO/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Sanjay Kumar, LPG/CCC/LOCO/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Sanjay Kumar, LPG/CCC/LOCO/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Sanjay Kumar, LPG/CCC/LOCO/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri K.Krishna Rao, LPG /CCC/LOCO/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri K.Krishna Rao, LPG /CCC/LOCO/BIA is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri K.Krishna Rao, LPG /CCC/LOCO/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri K.Krishna Rao, LPG /CCC/LOCO/BIA ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri K.Krishna Rao, LPG
/CCC/LOCO/BIA.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri K.Krishna Rao, LPG /CCC/LOCO/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri B.R.Chandrakar, Sr ALP/CCC/LOCO/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Yashwant Verma, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Yashwant Verma, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/BIA ex-
parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
On date 23-04-18, you had worked in 16:00 to 00:00 hrs shift as DPC in control
office. You had not informed to the undersigned about the incident. The undersigned came to
know about the incident through the morning position on 24-04-18 at 06:30 hrs. Instructions
have been issued to all the staff working in the control office to give intimation to the under
undersigned about Diesel loco failures and all unsatisfactory cases.
You failed to intimate to the undersigned about the incident took place and the matter
is related to passenger train operation.
By the above act of Sri Yashwant Verma, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Sunil Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Sunil Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/R fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Sunil Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/R ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Sunil Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/R has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Sanjay Kumar-III, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Manjit Kumar, Sr ALP/CCC/LOCO/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Manjit Kumar, Sr ALP/CCC/LOCO/BIA ex-
parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Manjit Kumar, Sr ALP/CCC/LOCO/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
As per the enquiry report of CLI/R, you moved back the loco due to some trouble in
stomach. You moved back the said loco without information to DLS/R and YM/RSD which
is violation of safety. You also failed to intimate the matter to on duty DPC regarding health
trouble.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Anil Kumar Gupta, LPG/CCC/LOCO/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Anil Kumar Gupta, LPG/CCC/LOCO/R is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Anil Kumar Gupta, LPG/CCC/LOCO/R fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Anil Kumar Gupta, LPG/CCC/LOCO/R ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Anil Kumar Gupta,
LPG/CCC/LOCO/R.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Anil Kumar Gupta,
LPG/CCC/LOCO/R.
On date 04-02-18, you had worked Train No. DMLE/BSP with Loco No. 16130/Raipur.
1
As per report of DLS/R, during working in RSD - BSP section, at 02:23 hrs, VCD got
operated on run at a speed of 9.1 kmph. You had put a remark in log book that “VCD
counter increased during cab changing”. This is an inappropriate remark as you failed to
follow the correct procedure of cab changing results in VCD operation.
By the above act of Sri Anil Kumar Gupta, LPG/CCC/LOCO/R has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Santosh Kumar, LPG/CCC/LOCO/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Santosh Kumar, LPG/CCC/LOCO/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Santosh Kumar, LPG/CCC/LOCO/BIA ex-
parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
You failed to acknowledge the VCD as per the stipulated time set in the locomotive
resulted in operation of VCD which is an unsafe practice during working of trains.
Instructions regarding working VCD has been issued to you several times. But you had
failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
By the above act of Sri Santosh Kumar, LPG/CCC/LOCO/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri G.K.Verma, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri G.K.Verma, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri G.K.Verma, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/Raipur ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri G.K.Verma, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/Raipur has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Bhupesh Chand Verma,
LP(Shg-I)/CCC/LOCO/BIA.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Bhupesh Chand Verma, LP(Shg-I)/CCC/LOCO/BIA has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Bhupesh Chand Verma,
LP(Shg-I)/CCC/LOCO/BIA.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Bhupesh Chand Verma, LP(Shg-I)/CCC/LOCO/BIA has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri P.D.Sharma, SSE/C&W/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri P.D.Sharma, SSE/C&W/BMY fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri P.D.Sharma, SSE/C&W/BMY ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri P.D.Sharma, SSE/C&W/BMY has failed to maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri G.K.Verma, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri G.K.Verma, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri G.K.Verma, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/Raipur ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri G.K.Verma, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/Raipur has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri T.Ramana Rao, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri T.Ramana Rao, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri T.Ramana Rao, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri T.Ramana Rao, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/DRZ ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri T.Ramana Rao, LPG/
CCC/LOCO/DRZ.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri T.Ramana Rao, LPG/ CCC/LOCO/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Aditya Kumar Maurya, Helper-II/CC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Aditya Kumar Maurya,
Helper-II/CC/Loco/DRZ.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri Aditya Kumar Maurya, Helper-II/CC/Loco/DRZ has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri D.K.Verma, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri D.K.Verma, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri D.K.Verma, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri D.K.Verma, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Rajesh Kumar – I, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Rajesh Kumar – I, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Raipur is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Rajesh Kumar – I, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Raipur fails to submit his representation within
the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Rajesh Kumar – I, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Raipur
ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Rajesh Kumar – I, Loco Pilot
(Goods)/Raipur.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
You failed to inform about the trouble of Locomotive to on duty DPC within the
stipulated period results in detention of train at MNDH yard.
By the above act of Sri Rajesh Kumar – I, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Raipur has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Dinesh Prasad Dewangan,
LP(Goods)/CCC/Loco/BIA.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Dinesh Prasad
Dewangan, LP(Goods)/CCC/Loco/BIA
On date 05-05-18, you had worked Train No. N/KLMG with Loco No. 13592/Raipur.
1
As per report of DLS/R, during working in BYT-BMY section at 15:02 hrs, VCD got
operated on run at a speed of 5 kmph. You had put remark in log book that the VCD got
operated during cab changing.
By the above act of Sri Dinesh Prasad Dewangan, LP(Goods)/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri H.C.Kar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri H.C.Kar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/Raipur ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri H.C.Kar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/Raipur has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take action
against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable
to be passed against Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT has failed in maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Raju Chaudhary, LPG/Loco/BYT is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Raju Chaudhary, LPG/Loco/BYT fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Raju Chaudhary, LPG/Loco/BYT ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Due to your carelessness and negligence for unable to resetting VCD and also even for not
clearing light load with rear loco which ultimately led to punctuality loss of two Mail/Exp
trains. Instructions regarding working of VCD in Diesel locos has been issued to you several
times. But you had failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
By the above act of Sri Raju Chaudhary, LPG/Loco/BYT has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Bipin Kumar, ALP/Loco/BYT is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Bipin Kumar, ALP/Loco/BYT is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation
as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted
to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Bipin Kumar, ALP/Loco/BYT fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Bipin Kumar, ALP/Loco/BYT ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Due to your carelessness and negligence for unable to resetting VCD and also even for
not clearing light load with rear loco which ultimately led to punctuality loss of two
Mail/Exp trains. Instructions regarding working of VCD in Diesel locos has been issued to
you several times. But you had failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway
administration.
By the above act of Sri Bipin Kumar, ALP/Loco/BYT has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Avinash Paul, Loco Pilot
(Shunting)/CCC/Loco/Raipur.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Avinash Paul, Loco
Pilot (Shunting)/CCC/Loco/Raipur
On date 18-07-18, you were booked for Shunting duty at RSD Pooling from 14:00 to
22:00 hrs. You had energized Loco No. 70036+12356/R at DLS/R. While reversing the MU
1
loco, trouble got in Loco No. 70036 due to throttle not responding with a message “PCS
open” displayed in screen. But you had not demanded relief loco till 19:00 hrs.
By the above act of Sri Avinash Paul, Loco Pilot (Shunting)/CCC/Loco/Raipur has failed
in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Yashwant Verma, Loco Pilot (Goods)/CCC/ Loco/Bhilai working as DPC/Raipur fails
to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she
has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Yashwant
Verma, Loco Pilot (Goods)/CCC/ Loco/DPC/Raipur ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Yashwant Verma, Loco Pilot
(Goods)/CCC/ Loco/Bhilai working as DPC/Raipur.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Yashwant Verma, Loco
Pilot (Goods)/CCC/ Loco/Bhilai working as DPC/Raipur.
On date 18-07-18, while working in 08 – 16 hrs shift as DPC, Sri Avinash Paul (LPS-I)/R
had informed you at 15:50 hrs about trouble of Loco No. 70036+12356/R due to throttle not
1
responding with a message “PCS open” displayed in screen of Loco No. 70036. But you had
not demanded relief loco till 16:00 hrs.
By the above act of Sri Yashwant Verma, Loco Pilot (Goods)/CCC/ Loco/Bhilai working
as DPC/Raipur has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a
railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct)
Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Rakesh Singh, Loco Pilot (Goods)/CCC/ Loco/Raipur working as DPC/Raipur fails
to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she
has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Rakesh Singh,
Loco Pilot (Goods)/CCC/ Loco/Raipur working as DPC/Raipur ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Rakesh Singh, Loco Pilot
(Goods)/CCC/ Loco/Raipur working as DPC/Raipur .
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Rakesh Singh, Loco
Pilot (Goods)/CCC/ Loco/Raipur working as DPC/Raipur .
On date 18-07-18, while working in 08 – 16 hrs shift as DPC, Sri Avinash Paul (LPS-I)/R
had informed you at 15:50 hrs about trouble of Loco No. 70036+12356/R due to throttle not
1
responding with a message “PCS open” displayed in screen of Loco No. 70036. But you had
not demanded relief loco till 16:00 hrs.
By the above act of Sri Rakesh Singh, Loco Pilot (Goods)/CCC/ Loco/Raipur working
as DPC/Raipur has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a
railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct)
Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri J.S.Jangde, Loco Pilot
(Goods)CCC/Loco/Bhilai working as DPC/Raipur.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri J.S.Jangde, Loco Pilot
(Goods)CCC/Loco/Bhilai working as DPC/Raipur.
On date 18-07-18, while working in 16 – 0 hrs shift as DPC, Sri Avinash Paul (LPS-I)/R
had informed control office at 15:50 hrs about trouble of Loco No. 70036+12356/R due to
1
throttle not responding with a message “PCS open” displayed in screen of Loco No. 70036.
But you had not demanded relief loco till 19:00 hrs.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri R.K.Verma, SSE/C&W/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri R.K.Verma, SSE/C&W/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri R.K.Verma, SSE/C&W/Raipur ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 23-07-18, you were booked at Raipur Station duty from 06:00 to 14:00 hrs.
1
While train no:- 22827 Exp. Arrived on platform No.03 at 10.25hrs and EOT at 10:42 hrs.
with Engine No.22673 WAP-4E. You had failed to detect and rectify the pressure trouble of
the above train during Air pressure continuity. As a result the above train was detained for
1:18 hrs. in C&W account.
By the above act of Sri R.K.Verma, SSE/C&W/Raipur has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri J.S.Jangde, Loco Pilot
(Goods) /CCC/ Loco/Bhilai working as DPC/Raipur.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri J.S.Jangde, Loco Pilot
(Goods)CCC/Loco/Bhilai working as DPC/Raipur.
On date 24-07-18 you had worked in 16-0 hrs shift as DPC/Raipur. As per report of
CDCP/Raipur, Dy CHC/R has served DR No. 79 to DPC/R stating that “No further WDG3A
1
and WDG4 single power will be taken from shed”. On the base of said DR number, you had
conveyed the above message to DLS/Raipur through R/PC No. 374 at 00:10 hrs on 25-07-
18. You had conveyed the message without informing the matter to the undersigned as it is a
matter of policy between Operating department and DLS/R. The matter was gone to the
knowledge of CMPE/SECR but the undersigned was unaware of the fact.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Bhupesh Sahu, Loco Pilot (Goods)/CCC/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Bhupesh Sahu, Loco Pilot (Goods)/CCC/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation
within the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to
make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Bhupesh Sahu, Loco Pilot
(Goods)/CCC/Loco/Raipur ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Bhupesh Sahu, Loco Pilot
(Goods)/CCC/Loco/Raipur.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Bhupesh Sahu, Loco
Pilot (Goods)/CCC/Loco/Raipur.
On date 05-09-18, you have been booked for TO of 10:30 hrs for Train No.
1
LBPM/BTPN. Train departed from RSD yard at 12:15 hrs with working Loco No.
70128/WDG4/R and arrived MNDH station at 13:00 hrs. The said train took so much time to
clear the section even though the outer signal and home signal were lowered in advance. The
gross load of the train is 4050T (52/52). As a result of this, 03 nos coaching trains were also
got effected and punctuality loss took place on Diesel loco account. You failed to clear the
section with a gross load of 4050T with WDG4 loco within the time.
By the above act of Sri Bhupesh Sahu, Loco Pilot (Goods)/CCC/Loco/Raipur has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Dipankar Mandal, CLI/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Dipankar Mandal, CLI/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Dipankar Mandal, CLI/Loco/Raipur ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 05-09-18, you have conducted footplate inspection in Train No. LBPM/BTPN
1
with your assigned crew Sri Bhupesh Sahu, LPG/Raipur from RSD to MNDH. Train
departed from RSD yard at 12:15 hrs with working Loco No. 70128/WDG4/R and arrived
MNDH station at 13:00 hrs. The said train took so much time to clear the section even
though the outer signal and home signal were lowered in advance. The gross load of the train
is 4050T (52/52). As a result of this, 03 nos coaching trains were also got effected and
punctuality loss took place on Diesel loco account. You failed to guide the crew in handling
of train.
By the above act of Sri Dipankar Mandal, CLI/Loco/Raipur has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri A.Srinivas, LP(Goods)/ CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri A.Srinivas, LP(Goods)/ CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri A.Srinivas, LP(Goods)/ CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 04-07-18, you had worked Train No. BOST/AWZ with Loco No.
1
16464/Raipur. As per report of DLS/R, during working in BIA-AWZ section at 17:48 hrs,
VCD got operated on run at a speed of 12 kmph. You had put remark in log book that during
working in banker, Reverser-Neutral condition and VCD applied.
By the above act of Sri A.Srinivas, LP(Goods)/ CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Mahesh Budhe, LP(S)-I/ CCC/Loco /DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Mahesh Budhe, LP(S)-I/ CCC/Loco /DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Mahesh Budhe, LP(S)-I/ CCC/Loco /DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Mahesh Budhe, LP(S)-I/ CCC/Loco /DRZ ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Mahesh Budhe, LP(S)-I/
CCC/Loco /DRZ.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Mahesh Budhe, LP(S)-I/
CCC/Loco /DRZ.
On date 26-05-18, you had performed yard shunting with Loco No. 13416/Raipur at
1
DRZ yard. As per report of DLS/R, during working in Yard shunting, at 12:28 hrs, VCD got
operated on run at a speed of 10.9 kmph. You had put a remark in the log book that “VCD
applied by mistake during shunting work”. This is an inappropriate remark.
You failed to acknowledge the VCD as per the stipulated time set in the locomotive
resulted in operation of VCD which is an unsafe practice during working of trains.
Instructions regarding working VCD has been issued to you several times. But you had
failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
By the above act of Sri Mahesh Budhe, LP(S)-I/ CCC/Loco /DRZ has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take action
against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable
to be passed against Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri K.K.Sahu,
CLI/Loco/BYT.
In the recent days it was noted that the Loco Pilots are not reacting in crisis like Loco
failures, abnormal conditions to minimize the detention of trains in section. One such case
1
was occurred at DGS station on 11-11-18 in which Sri Santosh Kumar Jena,
LP(Goods)/BYT failed to ask relief loco within minimum possible time results in detention
of train in section. This was took place due to improper monitoring/counseling of assigned
crew by you.
By the above act of Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT has failed in maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Santosh Kumar Jena, LP(Goods)/Loco/BYT is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Santosh Kumar Jena, LP(Goods)/Loco/BYT is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Santosh Kumar Jena, LP(Goods)/Loco/BYT fails to submit his representation within
the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Santosh Kumar Jena, LP(Goods)/Loco/BYT ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Santosh Kumar Jena,
LP(Goods)/Loco/BYT.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 11-11-18, you were booked for TO at 02:00 hrs and had worked Train No.
1
N/Box/E-517 with Loco No. 12410+70036/Raipur departed from BYT station at 02:35 hrs,
arrived DGS station at 03:57 hrs. While starting the train from DGS station, train stopped at
04:15 hrs after passing starter signal due to BP pressure dropped to zero with message
“Communication Link Failure- MAB” displayed in the screen. But you had not demanded
relief loco till 04:50 hrs.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Chandrakant
Deshmukh, LP(Goods)/Loco/BIA .
On date 03-12-18, you were booked for TO at 20:00 hrs, Sign On at 19:30 hrs and
1
proceed as Pilot (Spare) by Train No. 68718/18241 and arrived Tilda at 22:35 hrs. You had
worked Train No. N/Box/E from GMR siding whose departure is at 03:40 hrs from GMR
siding and stopped the train on through signal at BYT station on main line i.e. platform line
at 06:30 hrs resulting in detention of coaching trains due to non-availability of platform line.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Y.K.Baghel, Drafted DPC (LP(Goods)/Raipur) is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Y.K.Baghel, Drafted DPC (LP(Goods)/Raipur) fails to submit his representation within
the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Y.K.Baghel, Drafted DPC (LP(Goods)/Raipur)
ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Y.K.Baghel, Drafted DPC
(LP(Goods)/Raipur).
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 04-12-18, you were booked for 00 – 08 hrs shift duty as Power controller in
1
Control office. While performing duties you failed to co-ordinate with SCR and crew
resulting in stopping of Train No. N/Box/E on through signal by Sri Chandrakant
Deshmukh, LP(Goods)/BIA at BYT station on main line i.e. platform line at 06:30 hrs
resulting in detention of coaching trains due to non-availability of platform line.
By the above act of Sri Y.K.Baghel, Drafted DPC (LP(Goods)/Raipur) has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr ALP/CCC/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr ALP/CCC/DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr ALP/CCC/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr ALP/CCC/DRZ ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr
ALP/CCC/DRZ
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr
ALP/CCC/DRZ.
By the above act of Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr ALP/CCC/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Santosh Kumar Paswan, LP(Goods)/CCC/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Santosh Kumar Paswan,
LP(Goods)/CCC/Raipur.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Santosh Kumar Paswan,
LP(Goods)/CCC/Raipur.
On date 11/12-03-2019, you had worked Train No. N/KRDH with Loco No. 14675
1
+ 14879/VSKP. While admitting in RVH, at 00:39 hrs, VCD got operated at a speed of 15
kmph and penalty application of brakes applied resulting in stopping of train obstructing the
block section as well as yard. This adversely detention of freight and coaching trains.
You failed to acknowledge the VCD as per the stipulated time set in the locomotive
resulted in operation of VCD which is an unsafe practice during working of trains.
Instructions regarding working VCD has been issued to you several times. But you had
failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
By the above act of Sri Santosh Kumar Paswan, LP(Goods)/CCC/Raipur has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Tarun Kumar, ALP/CCC/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Tarun Kumar, ALP/CCC/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Tarun Kumar, ALP/CCC/Raipur ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Tarun Kumar,
ALP/CCC/Raipur.
On date 11/12-03-2019, you had worked Train No. N/KRDH with Loco No. 14675
1
+ 14879/VSKP with Sri Santosh Kumar Paswan, LP(Goods)/R. While admitting in RVH, at
00:39 hrs, VCD got operated at a speed of 15 kmph and penalty application of brakes applied
resulting in stopping of train obstructing the block section as well as yard. This adversely
detention of freight and coaching trains.
You failed to assist the LP properly resulted in operation of VCD which is a unsafe
practice during working of trains. Instructions regarding working VCD has been issued to
you several times. But you had failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway
administration.
By the above act of Sri Tarun Kumar, ALP/CCC/Raipur has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Sr ALP/CCC/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Sr ALP/CCC/DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Sr ALP/CCC/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Sr ALP/CCC/DRZ ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Sr
ALP/CCC/DRZ.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Sr
ALP/CCC/DRZ.
As per the report of CCC/Loco/DRZ, you were remain unauthorized absent from
1
10-11-18 to till date and submitted both unfit and fit certificated on date 12-03-2019. You
had neither submitted sick certificates in time nor informed to the office. Absent from duty
without intimation for such a long time is serious misconduct and indiscipline. Your
previous record also reveals that you are irregular and irresponsible about the duty.
By the above act of Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Sr ALP/CCC/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ranjan Kumar Singh, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Ranjan Kumar Singh, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Raipur is hereby given an opportunity to make
such representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Ranjan Kumar Singh, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Raipur fails to submit his representation
within the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to
make and orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Ranjan Kumar Singh, Loco Pilot
(Goods)/Raipur ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Ranjan Kumar Singh, Loco
Pilot (Goods)/Raipur.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Ranjan Kumar Singh,
Loco Pilot (Goods)/Raipur.
By the above act of Sri Ranjan Kumar Singh, Loco Pilot (Goods)/Raipur has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Jai Shree Mandal, Tech-I/SSE/C&W/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Jai Shree Mandal, Tech-I/SSE/C&W/Raipur is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Jai Shree Mandal, Tech-I/SSE/C&W/Raipur fails to submit his representation within
the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Jai Shree Mandal, Tech-I/SSE/C&W/Raipur ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Jai Shree Mandal,
Tech-I/SSE/C&W/Raipur.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Jai Shree Mandal, Tech-I/
SSE/C&W/Raipur.
By the above act of Sri Jai Shree Mandal, Tech-I/SSE/C&W/Raipur has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(C&W)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri A.M.Khan, CLI/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take action
against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri A.M.Khan, CLI/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to
be passed against Sri A.M.Khan, CLI/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri A.M.Khan,
CLI/Loco/BIA.
This indicates that you are not monitor the performance of assigned crew and also
failed to counsel your assigned crew about the alertness and how to react in different
conditions to ensure safe working of trains.
By the above act of Sri A.M.Khan, CLI/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Vinay Pantwane, CLI/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Vinay Pantwane, CLI/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Vinay Pantwane, CLI/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Vinay Pantwane,
CLI/Loco/BIA.
This indicates that you are not monitor the performance of assigned crew and also
failed to counsel your assigned crew about the correct driving technique and controlling of
trains to ensure sage running of trains.
By the above act of Sri Vinay Pantwane, CLI/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Amit Singh, ALP/Loco/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Amit Singh, ALP/Loco/BMY is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as
he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to
the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Amit Singh, ALP/Loco/BMY fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Amit Singh, ALP/Loco/BMY ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Amit Singh, ALP/Loco/BMY.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You failed to acknowledge the VCD as per the stipulated time set in the locomotive
resulted in operation of VCD which is an unsafe practice during working of trains.
Instructions regarding working VCD has been issued to you several times. But you had
failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
By the above act of Sri Amit Singh, ALP/Loco/BMY has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Basant Kumar, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Basant Kumar, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Basant Kumar, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 22-03-19, call book was served from DRZ lobby for T.O of 03:00 hrs.You
1
refused the call book and reported sick at the time of call book. Due to your refusal of call
book, freight service and shunting movement was also hamperd at DRZ.
By the above act of Sri Basant Kumar, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Rakesh Kumar, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Rakesh Kumar, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Rakesh Kumar, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CC/DRZ, you made Sign OFF at 02.25 hrs. at DRZ lobby on date
1
29.03.19 and marked PR on roster as per your demand. Due to acute position of LPG at
DRZ lobby, crew were not available for TO of 00.00hrs. Seeing the condition, the lobby
staff had cancelled your PR and served call book to you for TO of 00.00hrs, but you refused
the call book. You had not accepted the call book even after CC/DRZ requested you to
manage train services. The freight services in the circuit were badly hampered due to your
refusal.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Rakesh Kumar, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu,
LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu,
LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
As per the report of CC/DRZ, you made Sign OFF at 02.25 hrs. at DRZ lobby on
1.
date 29.03.19 and marked PR on roster as per your demand. Due to acute position of LPG at
DRZ lobby, crew were not available for TO of 00.00hrs. Seeing the condition, the lobby
staff had cancelled your PR and served call book to you for TO of 00.00hrs. You refuse the
call book and stating that you were out of HQ. You left the HQ without perier intimation to
CC/LOCO/DRZ. You were chargesheete earlier for the same reason but again you had
comitted same mistake. The freight services in the circuit were badly hampered due to your
refusal.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
.
By the above act of Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Rupesh Mishra, ALP/CCC/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Rupesh Mishra, ALP/CCC/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Sanat Kumar Sahu, LPG/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-
parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 03-04-19, you were booked for shunting duty in 14-22 hrs. shift at DLS/
1
Raipur. As per report of DLS/Raipur, you refused to go to HHP Loco Shed, results in
hampering of Diesel locative movement. You demanded vehicle to move to HHP shed for
performing shunting duty.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Rupesh Mishra, ALP/CCC/Loco/Raipur has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per Sr. Subordinate joint inquiry report which has been accepted by DRM/JBP, you
were declared primary responsible for detachment of wagon no :- CR10010660026 of train
no.-PCMC due to flat tyre at Hardua station at JBP Division.
By the above act of Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and
do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of
R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per Sr. Subordinate joint inquiry report which has been accepted by AGM/WCR &
DRM/JBP, you were declared secondery responsible for detachment of wagon no :-
CR10010660026 of train no.-PCMC due to flat tyre at Hardua station at JBP Division.
By the above act of Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and
do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of
R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Naresh, LP(S)-II/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Naresh, LP(S)-II/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per Sr. Subordinate joint inquiry report which has been accepted by DRM/JBP, you
were declared secondery responsible for detachment of wagon no :- CR10010660026 of train
no.-PCMC due to flat tyre at Hardua station at JBP Division.
By the above act of Sri Naresh,LP(S)-II/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under
R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per report of CCC/loco/DRZ, call book has been served from Lobby/DRZ on 21.03.2019 for to Dep-
08:30hrs you nefused the call book and neported sickon call book you failed to inform the Lobby abont
sick before serving call book. Nesnlts in hampriny of train serving in the cirkuit .As par attendance
neport of the last six months, it revents that you ine not regular in dnties. This shows gross neghgence on
duty and serion misanduct.
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per Sr. Subordinate joint inquiry report which has been accepted by AGM/WCR &
DRM/JBP, you were declared secondery responsible for detachment of wagon no :-
CR10010660026 of train no.-PCMC due to flat tyre at Hardua station at JBP Division.
By the above act of Sri T.K.Kalihari, SSE/C&W/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion to duty and
do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of
R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Taraknath Rakhit, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Taraknath Rakhit, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-
parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CC/DRZ, on date 05-04-19 “As soon as ready” call book was served
1
from DRZ lobby for T.O of 12:30 hrs of Train No. LE. You refused the call book at the time
of call book. Due to your refusal of call book, freight service and shunting movement was
also hamperd at DRZ.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Taraknath Rakhit, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Mukesh Kumar, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Mukesh Kumar, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Mukesh Kumar, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CC/DRZ, on date 05-04-19 “As soon as ready” c all book was
1
served from DRZ lobby for T.O of 12:30 hrs of Train No. LE. You refused the call book at
the time of call book. Due to your refusal of call book, freight service and shunting
movement was also hamperd at DRZ.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Mukesh Kumar, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Mukesh Kumar, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Mukesh Kumar, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Mukesh Kumar, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 03-03-19, you were booked for accompanying Train No:- 78816 for TO Dep.
1
05:50 hrs as it was decided to put conventional rake in place of DEMU rake.
You had accompanied with Loco No. 16745 from DRZ-Raipur where as accompanied
with Loco No 18927 from Raipur. While train is departing from Raipur, VCD got applied at
09:45 hrs on loco No.18927 in which you were accompanied and running in ‘Idle’ condition.
This results in detention of train at Raipur due to penalty application.
As per the enquiry report of CLI/BIA, you were held responsible for the VCD
application in Locomotive thereby detention of train.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Mukesh Kumar, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Taraknath Rakhit, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Taraknath Rakhit, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-
parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 19.04-19, you were booked for fuel issuer at DRZ fueling point from 13:00 hrs
1
to 21:00 hrs shift. As per the report of CC/DRZ, you failed to issue HSD oil to Loco No.
12408 arrived at 20:30 hrs and absconded from work place since 18:30 hrs. Apart from that
you had deputed some other person to handle the work of HSD oil issuing which is a serious
misconduct and negligency in your part. The activities of RCD are very sensitive and
transaction of HSD is a most valuable work which cannot be entrusted on other person. The
shunting movement of train services were badly hampered due to your absence from
RCD/DRZ.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Taraknath Rakhit, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CC/DRZ, on date 04-04-19 call book was served from DRZ lobby
1
for T.O of 23:15 hrs of Train No. 123 with Loco No:-70038. You refused the call book and
reported sick at the time of call book. Due to your refusal of call book, freight service and
shunting movement was also hamperd at DRZ.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr.ALP/CCC/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr.ALP/CCC/DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr.ALP/CCC/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr.ALP/CCC/DRZ ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj,
Sr.ALP/CCC/DRZ
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj,
Sr.ALP/CCC/DRZ.
As per the report of CC/DRZ, on date 08-04-19 a c all book was served from DRZ
1
lobby for T.O of 19:00 hrs of Train No. 147. You refuse the call book and stating that you
were out of HQ. You left the HQ without perier intimation to CC/LOCO/DRZ. The freight
services in the circuit were badly hampered due to your refusal.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Arvind Kumar Saroj, Sr.ALP/CCC/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Purendra Kumar, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Purendra Kumar, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Purendra Kumar, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CC/DRZ, technical circulars and safety circulars were put in the
1
order book for acknowledgement and implemention by crew. Technical circular no. 06/19
was put on 01-02-19 and zonal safety circular no. 02/2019 was put on 29-03-19. You had not
acknowledged the both circulars even though CC/DRZ advised to acknowledge. All kind of
circulars are issued which are related to the safe working of trains. Failure to acknowledge
the circulars may lead to any unavoidable mishap during working of trains.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Purendra Kumar, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri L.Babu Rao, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri L.Babu Rao, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri L.Babu Rao, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CC/DRZ, technical circulars and safety circulars were put in the
1
order book for acknowledgement and implemention by crew. Technical circular no. 06/19
was put on 01-02-19 and zonal safety circular no. 02/2019 was put on 29-03-19. You had not
acknowledged the both circulars even though CC/DRZ advised to acknowledge. All kind of
circulars are issued which are related to the safe working of trains. Failure to acknowledge
the circulars may lead to any unavoidable mishap during working of trains.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri L.Babu Rao, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ved Prakash, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Ved Prakash, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Ved Prakash, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CC/DRZ, technical circulars and safety circulars were put
1
in the order book for acknowledgement and implemention by crew. Safety circular no. 02/19
was put on 12-03-19 and zonal safety circular no. 02/2019 was put on 29-03-19. You had not
acknowledged the both circulars even though CC/DRZ advised to acknowledge. All kind of
circulars are issued which are related to the safe working of trains. Failure to acknowledge
the circulars may lead to any unavoidable mishap during working of trains.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Ved Prakash, ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Naresh, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Naresh, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Naresh, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CCC/DRZ, call book has been served from DRZ lobby on date
1
21-03-19 for T.O of 08:30 hrs. You refused the call book and reported sick at the time of call
book. You failed to inform the lobby about sickness before serving call book results in
hampering of train services at DRZ. As per attendance report of the last six months, it
reveals that you are not regular in duties.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Naresh, LPS/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri P.K.Sahay, ALP/CCC/LOCO/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri P.K.Sahay, ALP/CCC/LOCO/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri P.K.Sahay, ALP/CCC/LOCO/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Kishor Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. If Sri Kishor Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/R fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Kishor Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/R ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 18-06.19, you were booked for TO Departure 13:00 hrs made Sign ON at
1
12:30 hrs at Raipur. You worked Train No.:-N/MSIM from MNDH to RSD and proceed
PT/Jeep to MNDH for work Train No:- BCN/ARA at MNDH at 22:28 hrs. But you refused
to start the train. You refused to work the train even after DPC/R requested to you, results in
detaintion of train service in MNDH to RSD.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Kishor Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/LOCO/R has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri K.Raja Rao, Sr.ALP/CCC/LOCO/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri K.Raja Rao, Sr.ALP/CCC/LOCO/BMY fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri K.Raja Rao, Sr.ALP/CCC/LOCO/BMY ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 18.05.19, you were booked for shunting duty in the shift 22-06 hrs at PP
1
Yard/Bhilai. You had performed shunting with Loco No. 13627 and proceed forward
without observing SH-21 which was at “ON” position and bursted point no. 104 which was
set for reception of train on another line. As per the joint enquiry report, you were held
responsible to proceed forward without observing the shunt signal resulted bursting of said
point at PP Yard. You had violated G&SR 5.13.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri K.Raja Rao, Sr.ALP/CCC/LOCO/BMY has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri K.Harish Rao, SSE/TL/DURG is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri K.Harish Rao, SSE/TL/DURG is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation
as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted
to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri K.Harish Rao, SSE/TL/DURG fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri K.Harish Rao, SSE/TL/DURG ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were assigned to look after TL of coaches in shifts at Durg. As per the report of
ADEE(RS)/Durg, you were very casual towards the assigned duties results in hampering of train
services which was established by incidents took place in the recent time.
1. On dated 02.05.19 you were booked for night shift (22-6 hrs), but you did not turned up for
your duty without information to SSE (In-charge) and remained absent in PN Shift or you
have reported in general shift due to which the distribution work was delayed abnormally
results in hampering of train service due to lack of supervision. Treating as a first occasion,
you were warned by ADEE(RS)/Durg.
2. On dated 17.05.19 (22-6 hrs shift) again you obscured from your duties without any
information as per the written information given by on duty staff. As a shift in-charge
leaving the work spot is a serious offence and gross negligence.
3. On dated 28.05.19, you were refused to work in night shift for 04 days a week when
ADEE(RS)/Durg advised to do stating the inability to perform duties in night shift.
4. On date 14-06-19, you obscured from your duty keeping your CUG phone switched off
condition results in detention of trains due to summer season in in peak stage. You were
again warned for this occasion by ADEE(RS)/Durg.
The above instances show that you are irregular w.r.t. duties assigned to you and purely
violation of conduct rules. No improvement was noted in your service even though several
opportunities have been given to you. Your lenient view in discharging your duties shows
irresponsibility and gross negligence on duty from your side.
By the above act of Sri K.Harish Rao, SSE/TL/DURG has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 18.05.19, you were booked for shunting duty in the shift 22-06 hrs at PP
1
Yard/Bhilai. You had performed shunting with Loco No. 13627 and proceed forward
without observing SH-21 which was at “ON” position and bursted point no. 104 which was
set for reception of train on another line. As per the joint enquiry report, you were held
responsible to proceed forward without observing the shunt signal resulted bursting of said
point at PP Yard. You had violated G&SR 5.13.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ramashish Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Ramashish Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri P.K.Chandrawanshi, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-
parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were booked to perform shunting duty at DLS/Raipur for 6-14 hours shift on
1
10.05.19. As per report of DME(D)/DLS/Raipur, You were advised to move one Diesel
locomotive from By pass line to pit no.2 as the said locomotive is very close to the fire.
Shed supervisors and staff have advised to move the loco to save it from fire, but you had
not responded to the advice given. you had not acted according to emergency situation to
save the Railway property shows gross negligence and irresponsible W.r.t. to condact rules.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Ramashish Kumar, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to tim
(Placeholder1)e.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri I Paul prabhu Das, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri I Paul prabhu Das, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri I Paul prabhu Das, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri P.K.Chandrawanshi, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri I Paul prabhu Das,
LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri I Paul prabhu Das,
LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R.
You were booked to perform shunting duty at DLS/Raipur for 6-14 hours shift on
10.05.19. As per report of DME(D)/DLS/Raipur, You were advised to move one Diesel
1
locomotive from By pass line to pit no.2 as the said locomotive is very close to the fire.
Shed supervisors and staff have advised to move the loco to save it from fire, but you had
not responded to the advice given. you had not acted according to emergency situation to
save the Railway property shows gross negligence and irresponsible w.r.t. to condact rules.
This shows serioud misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri I Paul prabhu Das, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/R has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to tim
(Placeholder1)e.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Dhana laxmi Dewangan, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Dhana laxmi Dewangan, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within
the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Dhana laxmi Dewangan, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA
ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Dhana laxmi Dewangan,
LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were booked for TO Dep-07:30 hrs, sign on at 07:00 hrs on 29.07.19. You worked
1
Train No.N/BSPC from G/Cabin to PP/CLY and dropped at PP/CLY. After that you worked
Train No. panel Rail/SBPY from Exchange yard. The train admitted at DN THROUGH yard
at 13:55 hrs, Starter Signal was taken OFF at 14:58 hrs, But you failed to start the train when
DPC/Raipur on duly asked you about the incident, your reply was also irresponsible and
casual.
This shows serious misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Dhana laxmi Dewangan, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to tim (Placeholder1)e.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take action
against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable
to be passed against Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 07-08-19, DPC/R has advised you to proceed to the site at KM No. 1/12 in
1
MGMT – Tilda section where one accident took place due to JCB stuck with Electric Loco
of Train No. N/Box/E Ex MGMT. You straight away refused to proceed to the accident site
stating that you are in rest and will not go anywhere in any condition.
This shows serious misconduct and gross negligence on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BYT has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to tim (Placeholder1)e.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CCC(Loco)/BIA on date 15-08-19, you were booked for TO Dep at
1
12:00 hrs, Train No. N/Box/E. You had reported at lobby for performing Sign On. Another
crew have been booked for TO Dep at 12:00 hrs, Train No. “Super Long Haul” spl for
which Sri G.B.Rao, LPG/BIA and Sri Nand Kumar Verma, Sr ALP/BIA are present at lobby
for performing Sign On.
You misbehaved with Sri Nand Kumar Verma as per the rumour spread by Sri Vijay
Kumar G. You had scolded him with vulgar language without any reasonable cause and
distressed him while on duty. You also misbehaved with CCC(Loco)/BIA and challenging
him “Do whatever you want to do“. Misbehaving with the On duty staff in the administrative
office is a serious disconcert and violation of conduct rules. This kind of offence may badly
affect the atmosphere of the office. The entire incident was witnessed by the lobby staff of
all departments. Creating nuisance in the premises of the office is a serious offence.
This shows gross negligence on duty and violation of conduct rules in your part.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Vijay Kumar-G, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Vijay Kumar-G, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Vijay Kumar-G, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-
parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CCC(Loco)/BIA on date 15-08-19, you were booked for TO Dep at
1
12:00 hrs, Train No. N/Box/E with Sri D.Dileshwar Rao, LPG/BIA. Another crew have been
served for TO Dep at 12:00 hrs for Train No. “Super Long haul” in which Sri G.B.Rao,
LPG/BIA and Sri Nand Kumar Verma, Sr ALP/BIA were been booked. You tried to
exchange TO with Sri Nand Kumar Verma who was not agreed to do so.
As a result, you spread unnecessary rumours to Sri D.Dileshwar Rao by phone. With
the wrong information given by you, Sri D.Dileshwar Rao, LPG/BIA misbehaved with Sri
Nand Kumar Verma at lobby during Sign On. He had scolded him with vulgar language
without any reasonable cause also misbehaved with CCC(Loco)/BIA. Spreading unwanted
rumours may badly affect the atmosphere of the office.
This shows gross negligence on duty and violation of conduct rules in your part.
By the above act of Sri Vijay Kumar-G, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to tim
(Placeholder1)e.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Vijay Kumar, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Vijay Kumar, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BMY fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Vijay Kumar, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BMY ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
The said wagon was examined by you on date 18.07.2018 in P1 shift. But during the
examination, you failed to detect the defective wheel profile of wagon no. SC BCN/L
30098978639 due to which it got derailed at PNBE Yard. This shows that gross negligence
on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Vijay Kumar, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BMY has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Vijay Kumar, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Vijay Kumar, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BMY fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Vijay Kumar, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BMY ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
The said wagon was examined by you on date 18.07.2018 in P1 shift. But during the
examination, you failed to detect the defective wheel profile of wagon no. SC BCN/L
30098978639 due to which it got derailed at PNBE Yard. This shows that gross negligence
on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Vijay Kumar, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BMY has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Anoop Kumar, LP(S)-I/CCC/Loco/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Anoop Kumar, LP(S)-I/CCC/Loco/BMY fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Anoop Kumar, LP(S)-I/CCC/Loco/BMY ex-
parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were booked for shunting duty at exchange yard, Bhilai on 06.09.2019 for 14-22
1
hrs. shift. You had performed shunting duty with Loco No.36204. As per the joint enquiry
report of Sr.Subordinate level, while performing shunting from line No. 3(sickline) with 06
wagons to line no.1 of sick line, the train was drawn towards KMI end and stopped after
clearing point no 161. Later you moved the train without ensuring the point which was set
against the line on which the train stand results in bursting of point no 161. You have
violated G & SR rule 5.13.16.
This shows gross negligence on duty and violation of conduct rules in your part.
By the above act of Sri Anoop Kumar, LP(S)-I/CCC/Loco/BMY has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to tim
(Placeholder1)e.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Guneshwar Prasad, ALP/CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Guneshwar Prasad, ALP/CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Guneshwar Prasad, ALP/CCC/Loco/R ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CCC(Loco)/Raipur. You were under PMC from 29.10.19 to
1
31.10.19 and came on roster on 01.11.19 at 00.01 hrs Call book has been served from the
lobby for Train No. N/BSPC of TO Dep at 02:30 hrs. You has refused the call book and
misbehaved with lobby staff. You used vulgar language about Sri Rajesh Kumar, CC on
duty. Earlier you refused call book two times and CCC has advised to avoid refusing of call
book in future but you continued the same manner and refuse call book. Your leave record
reveals that you are not regular in duties and reporting sick often.
This shows gross negligence on duty and violation of conduct rules in your part.
By the above act of Sri Guneshwar Prasad, ALP/CCC/Loco/R has failed in maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to tim
(Placeholder1)e.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within
the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ
ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu,
Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ .
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu,
Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ .
As per report CC/DRZ, you were remained unauthorized absent from 03.10.19 to
1
31.10.19. You have produced both unfit and fit certificates on 31.10.19. Earlier you were
taken up under D&A two times for unauthorized absent and found to be drunkenness on
duty. You were punished for the both cases and advised to be regular on duty. But you
continued the same manner and remain unauthorized absent for one month.
This shows gross negligence on duty and violation of conduct rules in your part.
By the above act of Sri Rajesh Kumar Sahu, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to tim (Placeholder1)e.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri S.K.Patkar, CLI/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri S.K.Patkar, CLI/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri S.K.Patkar, CLI/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 21-11-19, you were booked for coaching Monitoring duty at Raipur lobby
1
from 20 to 08 hours shift. As per the report of CDPC/R, a trouble was reported in Loco
No.11568 of incoming train no.58528 for which your attendance is required.On duty DPC/R
has tried to contact you over CUG mobile. Several calls have been made to your mobile by
DPC and lobby staff.But you have not responded to the calls. As per the report of on duty
CC and running room staff, it was noted that you were sleeping in the CLI room at Raipur
running room. Running room staff has tried to alerting you by knocking the door for long
time. But you neither opened the door nor responding to the call. PC/R’s O. No. 717 has
been served to the lobby to call RPF for opening the door to know the face and to take
appropriate action. Finally you opened the door at about 02:19 hrs.
Coaching monitoring duty has been introduced at Raipur lobby to minimize the
detention of trains. But you failed to respond the call and found to be sleeping on duty.As a
Running Suoervisor, sleeping on duty is a serious concern and violation of conduct rules.
By the above act of Sri S.K.Patkar, CLI/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to tim
(Placeholder1)e.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri A.M.Khan, CLI/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri A.M.Khan, CLI/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri A.M.Khan, CLI/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Sri M.K.Sao, LP(G)/BIA has been assigned to you for monitoring and counseling. On
1
date 09.12.19, Sri M.K.Sao has worked Train No. N/PMAM from KRBA, the said train got
stalled at Km. No.694/31-33 between KRBA-URGA section and also caused wheel rail
burnt. As per the report of Sr.DEE(OP)/BSP, Sri M.K.Sao has been held responsible for the
stalling and rail burnt due to bad enginemanship. The Loco-Pilot failed to attain the required
speed for negotiating the gradient in the section leading to stalling thereby wheel rail burnt.
This indicates that you are not monitoring the performance of assigned Crew and also
failed to counsel your assigned crew about correct driving teachnique and the reuired steps to
prevent stalling of trains in section.
By the above act of Sri A.M.Khan, CLI/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to tim
(Placeholder1)e.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri M.K.Sao, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri M.K.Sao, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri M.K.Sao, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were booked for TO of 21:00 hrs. at KRBA for Train No. N/PMAM on date
1
09.12.19. As per the report of Sr.DEE(OP)/BSP, the said train got stalled at Km No.694/31-
33 between KRBA-URGA section at 22.15 hrs. and also caused rail burnt. You were held
responsible for the stalling and rail burnt due to bad enginemanship. You failed to achieve
the required speed for negotiating the gradient in the section leading to stalling thereby
wheel burnt rail. Passenger and freight services were detained at KRBA due to the stalling of
train in the section between KRBA-URGA.
By the above act of Sri M.K.Sao, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time
(Placeholder1)e.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 12-10-18, you were booked for Shunting duty at RSD yard in 6 – 14 hours shift. You had
performed shunting duty with Loco No: 13151/R. As per report of DLS/R, while performing shunting
duty with Loco No. 13151/Raipur, VCD got operated at 12:56 hrs on run at a speed of 11.3 kmph. You
had put remark in log book that “VCD counter increased 820 to 821”.
You failed to acknowledge the VCD as per the stipulated time set in the locomotive resulted in operation
of VCD which is an unsafe practice during working of trains. Instructions regarding working VCD has
been issued to you several times. But you had failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway
administration.
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Sanjay Kumar, LP(S)-I/CCC/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Sanjay Kumar, LP(S)-I/CCC/Loco/Raipur ex-
parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 12-10-19, you were booked for Shunting duty at RSD yard in 6 – 14 hours
1
shift. You had performed shunting duty with Loco No: 13151/R. As per report of DLS/R,
while performing shunting duty with Loco No. 13151/Raipur, VCD got operated at 12:56 hrs
on run at a speed of 11.3 kmph. You had put remark in log book that “VCD counter
increased 820 to 821”.
You failed to acknowledge the VCD as per the stipulated time set in the locomotive
resulted in operation of VCD which is an unsafe practice during working of trains.
Instructions regarding working VCD has been issued to you several times. But you had
failed to follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri V.R.Ravi, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri V.R.Ravi, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/Raipur ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 13-01-2020, you were booked for TO at 03:30 hrs, you had worked Train
1
No. BPCL/BTPN/E from LAE with Loco No. 12459/R. As per programme of the Operating
department, the said train was scheduled to run in “Up” direction via RSD, departure from
LAE at 08:15 hrs. Train arrived RSD at 10:15 hrs, departure at 10:20 hrs and you informed
at 10:27 hrs about no LR in URK-SZB by pass line. The said train was detained at “Home”
signal and finally train was allowed via Raipur station. As per the report of CCC(Loco)/R,
LR has been updated in the CMS and no any prior intimation to CCC office about the lapse
of LR in the above section.
By the above act of Sri V.R.Ravi, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/Raipur has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time
(Placeholder1)e
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take action
against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period specified in
para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to
be passed against Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 19-01-2020, you were booked for Coaching Monitoring duty for the shift
1
from 08 – 20 hrs at Raipur lobby. CLIs are being engaged in coaching monitoring duty to
monitor the Diesel locomotives attached on coaching trains and to ensure right time
departure and punctuality of trains from Raipur station. Train No. 12808 arrived Raipur
station at 09:15 hrs, traction changed and departure from Raipur at 09:34 hrs. You were not
available at Raipur station since arrival of train to until departure. You had neither gone to
locomotives nor present at the time of attaching the locomotive on train. This is purely
violation of the instructions of the administration.
By the above act of Sri K.K.Sahu, CLI/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of
Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time (Placeholder1)e
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri S.L.Kashyap, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri S.L.Kashyap, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per report of Sr.DPO/R’s office you had filed court case before Hon’ble CAT/JBP
1
challenging the selection proceeding of chief Loco Inspector conducted through notification
dated-26.10.2017.
While examining the fact prima facie it reveals that, at the very you had filed the
instant OA, and signed the Verification column of the OA on 07.11.2019 which clearly
implies that you were very much available at Jabalpur on 07.11.2019. On the other hand it is
also seen from the attendance issued by Chief Crew Controller/Dallirajahara which is
showing that you were presented at Dallirajahara on 07.11.2019. Showing your presence in
two different places one at Dallirajahra and other at Jabalpur which is about 700 kilometres
faraway from Dallirajhara. As such it is quite impossible for you to be available at both
places simultaneously and serious suspicions about genuineness of the signature endorsed on
the copy of the Original Application enclosed. By this you had alleged misconduct i.e. not
taking prior approval for Head Quarter leaving permission as well as showing of your
signature in two different places as indicated above.
By the above act of Sri S.L.Kashyap, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time
(Placeholder1)e
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Nammi Naresh Yadav, Sr.Clerk/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Nammi Naresh Yadav,
Sr.Clerk/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were under SCL from 01.10.19 to 11.11.19 towards sparing under sports quota
1
after that you were remained in unauthorized absent till date. Neither information received
for continuation of SCL nor you have approached CCC/DRZ’s office. So the period from
12.11.19 to till date is treated as unauthorized absent.
By the above act of Sri Nammi Naresh Yadav, Sr.Clerk/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she
contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby
rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended
from time to time (Placeholder1)e
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri D.K.Verma, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri D.K.Verma, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were booked for yard shunting in exchange yard for the shift from 22-06 hrs.on
1
29.12.19. You had performed shunting with Loco No.13573/WDG3A/R in the shift.
Programme was given for movement of Loco No.13573/R to line no.12 from line no. 9A for
placement of sick wagons in sick line. During movement, the said loco breached the dead
end of siding and got derailed.
As per the joint inquiry report of Sr.Subordinate level you were held responsible for
derailment of Loco No. 13573/WD63A/R after breaching the dead end of the siding. During
shunting movement programme was given for movement of Loco No.13573/R from line
No.9A to line no12 for placement of sick wagons in sick line. You failed to apply the brakes
before dead end on time keeping the adequate distance and results breaching of dead end
there by derailment of all 03 pairs of wheel set of leading trolley.
By the above act of Sri D.K.Verma, LP(G)/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time
(Placeholder1)e
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri H.K.Sahu, LPS/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri H.K.Sahu, LPS/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri H.K.Sahu, LPS/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 08.01.2020, you were booked for yard shunting at Durg Yard in 06-14 hrs
1
shift. As per the report of Safety department of Raipur Division, you were held responsible
for the derailment of Loco No.13608/R over DS point no.68 of Goods shunting neck during
passage of Light Engine from line no. 8 to shunting neck. You were not alert and not
ensuring the correct setting of DS point No 68 resulted in derailment of said loco. You had
violated G&SR 5.13.06.
By the above act of Sri H.K.Sahu, LPS/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self
liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time
(Placeholder1)e
(G.Appa Rao)
Design: Sr.DME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Sonit Verma, LPG of CCC/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Sonit Verma, LPG of CCC/Loco/Raipur is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Sonit Verma, LPG of CCC/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Sonit Verma, LPG of CCC/Loco /Raipur ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Sonit Verma, LPG of
CCC/Loco /Raipur.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri Sonit Verma, LPG
of CCC/Loco /Raipur.
On 20.03.2020, You were booked for TO Dep. At 10:00 hrs, you worked train no
1
CLE/Ex RSD departed at 12:10 hrs and arrived PP/CLY at 15:20hrs. Section contraler/R
advised you to attach loco on Train No. N/BOX/E at PP/CEY.
You refuse to attach the loco on the train. All concerned officials have advised to
attach the loco on train, but you refused resulted in detention of freight train services and
yard movement at PP Yard. You violated the service conduct rules and disobey the lawful
orders of Railway administration resulted in huge loss to Railways.
By the above act of Shri Sonit Verma, LPG of CCC/Loco /Raipur has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1 (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time (Placeholder1)e
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Yogesh Deshmukh, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/ DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Yogesh Deshmukh, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/ DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make
such representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Yogesh Deshmukh, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/ DRZ fails to submit his representation
within the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to
make and orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Yogesh Deshmukh, Sr.ALP of
CCC/Loco/ DRZ ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Yogesh Deshmukh, Sr.ALP
of CCC/Loco/ DRZ.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You had performed fuel clerk duty at fuelling point DRZ in 00-08 hrs. shift on
1
24.04.2020. As per joint enquiry report of Sr.Subordinate level, you were held responsible
for the damage of fueling point no. 1 of line no.6 at DRZ Yard. You failed to ensure
separation of nozzle from loco no.12459 after completion of fuelling work and in the mean
time the crew of said loco moved the loco resulted in damage of fuelling point of line no 6 at
DRZ Yard. After completion of fuelling work neither separated the nozzle from loco nor
advised the crew to avoid movement of loco. You failed to ensure safe working in fuelling
activities of RCD/DRZ.
This shows gross negligence on duty in your part.
By the above act of Shri Yogesh Deshmukh, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/ DRZ has failed to maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1 (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Kumar Anish, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Kumar Anish, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Kumar Anish, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Kumar Anish, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Kumar Anish, Sr.ALP of
CCC/Loco/DRZ.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
During your duty with T.O. of 04:00 hrs. on date 24.04.2020, you placed the loco no.
1
12459 WDG4 for fuelling in line no.6 DRZ yard at fuelling point no.1 at 06:50 hrs. and
fuelling was done in between 07:00 hrs to 07:15 hrs. As per joint finding report of
Sr.Supervisors level, you were held responsible for damage of fueling pipe line by fuelling
out the loco without taking conformation from fuelling staff regarding separation of fuelling
nozzle. Before moving the loco you failed to ensure the separation of fueling nozzle which
resulted hampering of fueling of diesel locomotives at CRZ yard badly.
This incident took place due to gross negligence on duty in your part.
By the above act of Shri Kumar Anish, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Devendra Kumar Singh, Helper of CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri Devendra Kumar Singh, Helper of CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation
within the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to
make and orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Devendra Kumar Singh, Helper of
CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Devendra Kumar Singh,
Helper of CCC/Loco/DRZ.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F))/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You has performed duty at fuelling point DRZ in 00-08 hrs. shift on 24.04.2020. As
1
per joint enquiry report of Sr.Subordinate level, you were held responsible for the damage of
fuelling point no.1 of line no.6 at DRZ yard. You failed to separate the nozzle from loco no.
12459 after completion of fuelling work and in the mean time the crew of said loco moved
the loco resulted in damage of fuelling point no.6 of DRZ Yard. After completion of fulling
work neither separate the nozzle from loco nor advise the crew to avoid movement of
loco.This incident took place due to gross negligence and mis-communication.
By the above act of Shri Devendra Kumar Singh, Helper of CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed in
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened
the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable
for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time (Placeholder1)e
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F))/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Devendra Kumar Singh, Helper of CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri Devendra Kumar Singh, Helper of CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation
within the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to
make and orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Devendra Kumar Singh, Helper of
CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Devendra Kumar Singh,
Helper of CCC/Loco/DRZ.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F))/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You had performed duty at fuelling point DRZ in 00:00 hrs. to 08:00 hrs. shift on
1
24.04.2020. As per Sr.Subordinate level joint finding report, you were held responsible for
the damage of fueling pipeline. Loco No.12459 WDG4 was fuelling done by you between
07:00hrs to 07:15 hrs in line no.06 at fuelling point no.01 at DRZ. After fueling without
giving any information to shunter, you went away from the loco fuelling spot without
uncoupling/separating the fuelling nozzle and loco shunter pulled out the loco, resulting
damage of fuelling pipe line and fuelling work hampered badly in DRZ Yard.
This incident took place due to your carelessness and mis-communication which shows
gross negligence on duty in your part.
By the above act of Shri Devendra Kumar Singh, Helper of CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed to
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened
the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable
for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F))/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Satish Kumar Verma, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the
undersigned purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants
(Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or
misbehavior on which action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri Satish Kumar Verma, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation
within the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to
make and orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Satish Kumar Verma, Sr.ALP of
CCC/Loco/Raipur.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Satish Kumar Verma,
Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/Raipur.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per report of CCC/Loco/R, you were booked for performing booking clerk
1
duties at crew lobby RSD for the shift from 18:00 hrs to 00:00 hrs 13.05.2020. Shri Amit
Vaishnav, LPS-I failed to report shunting duty for RSD yard for the shift from 22:00 hrs to
6:00 hrs on 13.05.2020. you failed to note the matter and resulting hamper the shunting work
at RSD Yard. You also left the lobby before your duty hours. Absence from duty is serious
offense and violation of conduct rule.
By the above act of Shri Satish Kumar Verma, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/Raipur has failed to
maintain the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened
the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable
for disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri I.P.P.Das, LPS-I of CCC/Loco/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri I.P.P.Das, LPS-I of CCC/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri I.P.P.Das, LPS-I of CCC/Loco/Raipur.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per report of CCC/Loco/R, you were booked for RSD yard shunting for the shift
1
from 22:00 hrs to 6:00 hrs on 14.05.2020. You refuse the call book and denied to attend the
duty. Refusing to perfprm the duties is serius offense and the work of administration for
hamperd.
By the above act of Shri I.P.P.Das, LPS-I of CCC/Loco/Raipur has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri K.Raja Rao, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri K.Raja Rao, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri K.Raja Rao, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri K.Raja Rao, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/BIA.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri K.Raja Rao, Sr.ALP of
CCC/Loco/BIA.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 16.08.2020, you have performed shunting duty at PPYd/BIA with loco
1
no.16464/WDM3A/R in the shift from 22-06 hrs. 57 wagons were initially drawn out from
line no. 04 for sorting out sick wagons in siding line - 01 ex- shunting neck-01.After
placement of one wagon in siding line you have pull forward to shunting neck-1. You failed
to control the loco due to misjudgment of dead end resulted in breaching of dead end & All
wheels of leading trolley of said loco got derailed after breaching of dead end. You were
held responsible for this derailment as per the joint finding report as received from the safety
department duly approved by DRM/R.
By the above act of Shri K.Raja Rao, Sr.ALP of CCC/Loco/BIA has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Manash Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Manash Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Manash Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Manash Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/BIA ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Manash Kumar Sharma,
SSE/C&W/BIA.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Sri Manash Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Anand Kumar, LPG of CCC/Loco/BYT is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Anand Kumar, LPG of CCC/Loco/BYT is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Anand Kumar, LPG of CCC/Loco/BYT fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Anand Kumar, LPG of CCC/Loco/BYT.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Anand Kumar, LPG of
CCC/Loco/BYT.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri Anand Kumar,
LPG of CCC/Loco/BYT.
As per report of CLI/BYT, Dy.SS/BYT booked you as Co-LP for TO of 08:45 hrs
1
with Shri Manjeet Kumar, LPG/BYT on 26.09.2020. On duty Dy.SS/BYT attempted to call
you on your CUG mobile No.9752491286 at 06:15 hrs for serving call book for the said TO
of 08:45 hrs, but you have diverted the call and saying “Not Reachable”. It was tried several
times for serving call book to you until 06:50hrs. Hence, Dy.SS/BYT cancelled the said TO
and made diary entry no. 490 of BYT Station/Dt. 26-09-2020.
Finally after several attempts, call was made to you at 7:15 hrs and you stated that you
were at Bhilai. You were available for Train services since 07:45 hrs after availing 30 hours
PR, but you leave the HQ without any intimation resulted in “Not Found” and thereby
cancellation of TO. Leaving HQ without prior intimation is a serious misconduct as running
staff may be called for duty after completion of rest period for which you should be available
at HQ only.
By the above act of Shri Anand Kumar, LPG of CCC/Loco/BYT has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Harendra Singh, SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Harendra Singh, SSE/C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Harendra Singh, SSE/C&W/BIA ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annex
ure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Harendra Singh,
SSE/C&W/BIA.
Wagon no. NE 55040230177 BRN & SE 55070106327 BRN and Wagon no.
SE 56070510109 BRN & NCR 56130629567 BRN have detached during safe to run
examination at Ex-yard BIA, L-No.5 on 12.10.2020 for load adjustment.
1.
The said Wagon no. NE 55040230177 BRN & SE 55070106327 BRN certified
by you vide memo no.43 at 17.30 hrs on 11.10.2020 and Wagon no. 56070510109
BRN & NCR 56130629567 is also certified by you vide memo no. 03 at 17.00 hrs on
12.10.2020, but you failed to detect the improper loading of steel consignment by the
BSPC authority inside the loading point /BSPC.
By the above act of Sri Harendra Singh, SSE/C&W/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Chinta Ram, SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Chinta Ram, SSE/C&W/BIA, SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Chinta Ram, SSE/C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Chinta Ram, SSE/C&W/BIA ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Chinta Ram, SSE/C&W/BIA.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annex
ure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Chinta Ram,
SSE/C&W/BIA.
On date 18.09.20, Train No:- F/HSYG received at Ex Yard BIA for safe to run
Examination from BSPC. During safe to run Examination your staff removed the skid
and changed the position of hand brake ON to OFF at KUM end they also manually
1. released the brake of complete train due to which the said Train rolled down and point
no. 156 got busted. In above case, you are failed to take proper decision as a result of
this accident occurred.
By the above act of Sri Chinta Ram, SSE/C&W/BIA has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri P.Tejeswar Rao, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri P.Tejeswar Rao, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BIA ex-
parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annex
ure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri P.Tejeswar Rao,
Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BIA.
On date 18.09.20, Train No:- F/HSYG received at Ex Yard BIA for safe to
run Examination from BSPC. During safe to run Examination you removed the skid
and changed the position of hand brake ON to OFF at KUM end also manually
1. released the break of complete train without ensuring the EOT at Durg end as a result
of this said Train rolled down and point no. 156 got busted.
By the above act of Sri P.Tejeswar Rao, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Gobardhan, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Gobardhan, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BIA ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annex
ure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Gobardhan,
Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BIA.
On date 18.09.20, Train No:- F/HSYG received at Ex Yard BIA for
safe to run Examination from BSPC. During safe to run Examination you removed the
skid and changed the position of hand brake ON to OFF at KUM end also manually
1. released the break of complete train without ensuring the EOT at Durg end as a result
of this said Train rolled down and point no. 156 got busted.
By the above act of Sri Gobardhan, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BIA has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Dilip Kumar, SSE/C&W/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Dilip Kumar, SSE/C&W/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Gobardhan, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BIA ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annex
ure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Dilip Kumar,
SSE/C&W/Raipur.
On date 08.12.20, Train No:- 02772/R-SC Express detained in the section between
Raipur - SZB at KM -833/24 from 16:56 hrs to 17.17 hrs due to brake binding trouble
in Coach No:- SCR 10852 LWRRM next to Engine as hand brake of coach was not
1. released. The said train again got detained at H-cabin from 17:32 hrs to 17:45 hrs for
the same trouble i.e. Brake Binding of same coach.
As per the report of Sr CDO/Durg, you were held responsible for the detention of the
above said train as the train was attended by you at the originating station i.e. Raipur
on 08.12.2020 at 16:20 hrs and after EOT at P/F No -03. You failed to ensure proper
releasing of the hand brake of entire formation of the train resulted in brake binding of
the coach no. SCR 10852 LWRRM thereby detaintion of above train in section.
By the above act of Sri Dilip Kumar, SSE/C&W/Raipur has failed in maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Homendra Kumar, JE/SSE/C&W/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Gobardhan, Sr.Tech/SSE/C&W/BIA ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annex
ure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Homendra Kumar,
JE/SSE/C&W/Raipur.
As per the report of Sr CDO/Durg, you were held responsible for the detention
of the above said train as the train was attended by you at the originating station i.e.
Raipur on 08.12.2020 at 16:20 hrs and after EOT at P/F No -03. You failed to ensure
proper releasing of the hand brake of entire formation of the train resulted in brake
binding of the coach no. SCR 10852 LWRRM thereby detaintion of above train in
section.
By the above act of Sri Homendra Kumar, JE/SSE/C&W/Raipur has failed in maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Mantram Banjare, JE/C&W/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Mantram Banjare, JE/C&W/BMY fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Mantram Banjare, JE/C&W/BMY ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annex
ure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Mantram Banjare,
JE/C&W/BMY.
On date 09.12.20, Wagon SEC 12140553704, Wagon no. SE 10079762167 &
Wagon no. 25079868023 BOXN of Train No NBOX/E(PEE) have been rejected for
loading of commodity at DPK-2 siding(KORBA) due to major defects like Floor
1. Sheet deficient.
`
As per the report of ADME/BIA, you were held responsible for rejection of the
above said wagons as the train was examined and made fit by you on 07.12.20 at R-
Yard/BMY on line no.-03. You failed to ensure the condition of floor sheets of the
said wagons and made fit resulted in detachment at DPK-2 siding(KORBA).
By the above act of Sri Mantram Banjare, JE/C&W/BMY has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Khomu Ram, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Khomu Ram, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Khomu Ram, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annex
ure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Khomu Ram,
Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY.
On date 09.12.20, Wagon SEC 12140553704, Wagon no. SE 10079762167 &
Wagon no. 25079868023 BOXN of Train No NBOX/E(PEE) have been rejected for
loading of commodity at DPK-2 siding(KORBA) due to major defects like Floor
1. Sheet deficient.
`
As per the report of ADME/BIA, you were held responsible for rejection of
the above said wagons as the train was examined by you on 07.12.20 at R-Yard/BMY
on line no.-03. You failed to check the condition of floor sheets of the said wagons
during examination resulted in rejection for loading at DPK-2 siding(KORBA).
By the above act of Sri Khomu Ram, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Prem Kumar, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Prem Kumar, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Prem Kumar, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY ex-parte.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annex
ure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Prem Kumar,
Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY.
By the above act of Sri Prem Kumar, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY has failed in maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of R S (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Ranjit Singh, LPG of CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Ranjit Singh, LPG of CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Ranjit Singh, LPG of CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Ranjit Singh, LPG of CCC/Loco/BIA.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Ranjit Singh, LPG of
CCC/Loco/BIA.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri Ranjit Singh, LPG
of CCC/Loco/BIA.
As per report of Sr.DSO/R, you were held responsible for the derailment of BVZI
1
863210000059(Adani) in BXA Old Goods Shed line no.1 at dead end while performing
drawn out of Train No BCN/PSFI load on date 16.10.2020 at about 21.20 hrs. You failed to
observe the hand signals as well as verbal instructions given by shunting staff. You were not
vigilant during performing shunting operation and unable to stop the train well before
resulted in breaching of dead end thereby derailment of BVZI 863210000059(Adani) at
BXA in old Goods Shed line no.01.
By the above act of Shri Ranjit Singh, LPG of CCC/Loco/BIA has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri N.K.Sahu, SSE/C&W/RSD is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri N.K.Sahu, SSE/C&W/RSD fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable
to be passed against Shri N.K.Sahu, SSE/C&W/RSD.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri N.K.Sahu,
SSE/C&W/RSD.
As per report of DME/R, on date 14.12.2020 you were nominated for revalidation
1
work of N/PACT at MRLB/BYT with 04 staff. Nominaated staff reached the site at 17:20
hrs but you were not even turn up for site nor responding the phone calls. As a result
assigned work was not executed due to your irresponsible and reluctant behavior. Such
reckless and indiscipline behavior from a supervisor is intolerable. You were failed to
follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
By the above act of Shri N.K.Sahu, SSE/C&W/RSD has failed to maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under
R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, LPG of CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, LPG of CCC/Loco/R is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, LPG of CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, LPG of CCC/Loco/R.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, LPG of
CCC/Loco/R.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri Anil Kumar Gupta,
LPG of CCC/Loco/R.
As per the joint inquiry report (Sr.Subordinate level), you were held responsible for
1
the rail burnt case in RSD Yard near point No.58 B on 03.12.2020.
You had performed shunting operation in the shift 06-14hrs on 03.12.2020 at RSD
Yard. During the shunting operation, you had pulled train from line No.08 and push back in
line No.06. the said movement was done over point no 58 B between 6:15 hrs to 06:45 hrs.
No other loaded goods train movement was done over this point. You failed to ensure
smooth operation of diesel locomotive and improper driving technique is the reason for rail
burnt.
By the above act of Shri Anil Kumar Gupta, LPG of CCC/Loco/R has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/Durg fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Shri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/Durg.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri A.Ravi Shekhar,
SSE/C&W/Durg.
As per report of Sr.CDO/Durg, the theft of cables in power panel has been observed
1
from 10 AC and 04 Non-AC Coaches in last one month. The above said coaches became
unfit for operation due to theft of cables in power panel. Sr.CDO/DURG has already
instructed you for securing the coach by closing through vestibules and to be more vigilant
while rakes are being stabled. The theft of cables may be averted if you implement the
instructions given by Sr CDO/Durg on the above matter. This was occurred due to lack of
dedication towards duty being a Senior Supervisor.
By the above act of Shri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/Durg has failed to maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Surendra Prasad, LPG of CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Surendra Prasad, LPG of CCC/Loco/R is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Surendra Prasad, LPG of CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Surendra Prasad, LPG of CCC/Loco/R.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Surendra Prasad, LPG of
CCC/Loco/R.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri Surendra Prasad,
LPG of CCC/Loco/R.
As per report of DRM/SBP/ECOR, You were held responsible for the incident
1
occurred on 15.12.2020 in which the advanced starter signal No. 58 of TIG Yard got
damaged due to hitted by wagon door of Train No. BCN/KNGK. You failed to ensure proper
locking of the flap door wagons at the time of GDR check resulted in sudden opening on run
in the section and hit the signal post No. 58 advance starter of TIG/Yard/SBP Division.
By the above act of Shri Surendra Prasad, LPG of CCC/Loco/R has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/Durg fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Shri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/Durg.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri A.Ravi Shekhar,
SSE/C&W/Durg.
As per report of Sr.CDO/Durg, the theft of cables in power panel has been observed
1
from 10 AC and 04 Non-AC Coaches in last one month. The above said coaches became
unfit for operation due to theft of cables in power panel. Sr.CDO/DURG has already
instructed you for securing the coach by closing through vestibules and to be more vigilant
while rakes are being stabled. The theft of cables may be averted if you implement the
instructions given by Sr CDO/Durg on the above matter. This was occurred due to lack of
dedication towards duty being a Senior Supervisor.
By the above act of Shri A.Ravi Shekhar, SSE/C&W/Durg has failed to maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Ajay Pal, SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take action
against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Ajay Pal, SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as
he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to
the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Ajay Pal, SSE/C&W/Durg fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable
to be passed against Shri Ajay Pal, SSE/C&W/Durg.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Ajay Pal, SSE/C&W/Durg.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
By the above act of Shri Ajay Pal, SSE/C&W/Durg has failed to maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under
R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri NileshNinawe, SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri NileshNinawe, SSE/C&W/Durg fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Shri NileshNinawe, SSE/C&W/Durg.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri NileshNinawe,
SSE/C&W/Durg.
As per report of Sr.CDO/Durg, the theft of cables in power panel has been observed
1
from 10 AC and 04 Non-AC Coaches in last one month. The above said coaches became
unfit for operation due to theft of cables in power panel. Sr.CDO/DURG has already
instructed you for securing the coach by closing through vestibules and to be more vigilant
while rakes are being stabled. The theft of cables may be averted if you implement the
instructions given by Sr CDO/Durg on the above matter. This was occurred due to lack of
dedication towards duty being a Senior Supervisor.
By the above act of Shri NileshNinawe, SSE/C&W/Durg has failed to maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Vishwaraj Meshram, SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri Vishwaraj Meshram, SSE/C&W/Durg fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Vishwaraj Meshram, SSE/C&W/Durg.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri Vishwaraj
Meshram, SSE/C&W/Durg.
As per report of Sr.CDO/Durg, the theft of cables in power panel has been observed
1
from 10 AC and 04 Non-AC Coaches in last one month. The above said coaches became
unfit for operation due to theft of cables in power panel. Sr.CDO/DURG has already
instructed you for securing the coach by closing through vestibules and to be more vigilant
while rakes are being stabled. The theft of cables may be averted if you implement the
instructions given by Sr CDO/Durg on the above matter. This was occurred due to lack of
dedication towards duty being a Senior Supervisor.
By the above act of Shri Vishwaraj Meshram, SSE/C&W/Durg has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri R.K.Pandey, SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri R.K.Pandey, SSE/C&W/Durg fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Shri R.K.Pandey, SSE/C&W/Durg.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri R.K.Pandey,
SSE/C&W/Durg.
As per report of Sr.CDO/Durg, the theft of cables in power panel has been observed
1
from 10 AC and 04 Non-AC Coaches in last one month. The above said coaches became
unfit for operation due to theft of cables in power panel. Sr.CDO/DURG has already
instructed you for securing the coach by closing through vestibules and to be more vigilant
while rakes are being stabled. The theft of cables may be averted if you implement the
instructions given by Sr CDO/Durg on the above matter. This was occurred due to lack of
dedication towards duty being a Senior Supervisor.
By the above act of Shri R.K.Pandey, SSE/C&W/Durg has failed to maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri T.K.Sonwani, SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri T.K.Sonwani, SSE/C&W/Durg fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Shri T.K.Sonwani, SSE/C&W/Durg.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri T.K.Sonwani,
SSE/C&W/Durg.
As per report of Sr.CDO/Durg, the theft of cables in power panel has been observed
1
from 10 AC and 04 Non-AC Coaches in last one month. The above said coaches became
unfit for operation due to theft of cables in power panel. Sr.CDO/DURG has already
instructed you for securing the coach by closing through vestibules and to be more vigilant
while rakes are being stabled. The theft of cables may be averted if you implement the
instructions given by Sr CDO/Durg on the above matter. This was occurred due to lack of
dedication towards duty being a Senior Supervisor.
By the above act of Shri T.K.Sonwani, SSE/C&W/Durg has failed to maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Shailesh Kumar, JE/C&W/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri Shailesh Kumar, JE/C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Shri Shailesh Kumar, JE/C&W/BIA.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri Shailesh Kumar,
JE/C&W/BIA.
As per the joint inquiry report (Junior scale Level) of DDU/ECR, you were held
1
responsible for the derailment of 02 Wagons BFNS/E (ER 57021810569 & SECR
21141013902) of Train No CONCO EC-41002/DSL 36232 on 08.10.20 at KM No. 472/26 B
GYA yard of DDU division/ECR. The derailment was occurred due to rusty and dented
pivot of HWH end trolley of wagon No. ER 57021810569/BFNS resulted the trolley of the
said wagon could not negotiate the curve and side bearer cap fell down approx. 72 meters
away towards DLI end from P.O.D. and broken pivot of above wagon got derailed with
HWH end trolley moving to adjacent track and BOSTHS wagon got derailed also with
parting.
The said wagon was attended ROH schedule at Exchange yard/BIA on 30-09-2020
and made fit by you. You failed to detect the rusty and dented condition of Pivot pin of the
Wagon No ER 57021810569 resulting in derailment at GYA Km.-472/26 B on 08.10.20.
By the above act of Shri Shailesh Kumar, JE/C&W/BIA has failed to maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Rajesh Behara, Sr.Tech of SSE/C&W/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Rajesh Behara, Sr.Tech of SSE/C&W/ BIA is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Rajesh Behara, Sr.Tech of SSE/C&W/ BIA fails to submit his representation within
the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Rajesh Behara, Sr.Tech of SSE/C&W/BIA.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Rajesh Behara, Sr.Tech of
SSE/C&W/BIA.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the joint inquiry report (Junior scale Level) of DDU/ECR, you were held
1
responsible for the derailment of 02 Wagons BFNS/E (ER 57021810569 & SECR
21141013902) of Train No CONCO EC-41002/DSL 36232 on 08.10.20 at KM No. 472/26 B
GYA yard of DDU division/ECR. The derailment was occurred due to rusty and dented
pivot of HWH end trolley of wagon No. ER 57021810569/BFNS resulted the trolley of the
said wagon could not negotiate the curve and side bearer cap fell down approx. 72 meters
away towards DLI end from P.O.D. and broken pivot of above wagon got derailed with
HWH end trolley moving to adjacent track and BOSTHS wagon got derailed also with
parting.
The said wagon was attended ROH schedule at Exchange yard/BIA on 30-09-2020
and checked by you. You failed to detect the rusty and dented condition of Pivot pin of the
Wagon No ER 57021810569 resulting in derailment at GYA Km.-472/26 B on 08.10.20.
By the above act of Shri Rajesh Behara, Sr.Tech of SSE/C&W/BIA has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(ii) (iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri T.V.K.Reddy, LP
of CCC/Loco/BMY.
You were booked for TO dep at 21:15 hrs on 01-12-2020 and bursted point no.
1
102B while performing shunting operation at P/Cab-Exchange yard at 04:40 hrs on 02-12-
2020 with Loco No. 70583/WDG4D/ABR. As per the Sr.Supervisor level joint inquiry
report of Raipur Division, you were held secondary responsible for bursting of Point No.102
B at P.Cabin/Ex Yard at 04:40 hrs on 02.12.2020. You failed to ensure proper setting of
route during shunting movement resulted in bursting point no. 102B. You have violated GR
5.13(2) and SR 5.13.06.
By the above act of Shri T.V.K.Reddy, LP of CCC/Loco/BMY has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
Standard Form No.11/ RB
Standard Form of Memorandum of charge for imposing minor penalties
(Rules II of the RS(D&A) Rules,1968
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri Sunil Kumar Sahu, ALP of CCC/Loco/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Shri Sunil Kumar Sahu, ALP of CCC/Loco/BMY is hereby given an opportunity to make
such representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Shri Sunil Kumar Sahu, ALP of CCC/Loco/BMY fails to submit his representation within
the period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Shri Sunil Kumar Sahu, ALP of CCC/Loco/BMY.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Sunil Kumar Sahu, ALP of
CCC/Loco/BMY.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Shri Sunil Kumar Sahu,
ALP of CCC/Loco/BMY.
You were booked for TO dep at 21:15 hrs on 01-12-2020 and bursted point no.
1
102B while performing shunting operation at P/Cab-Exchange yard at 04:40 hrs on 02-12-
2020 with Loco No. 70583/WDG4D/ABR. As per the Sr.Supervisor level joint inquiry
report of Raipur Division, you were held secondary responsible for bursting of Point No.102
B at P.Cabin/Ex Yard at 04:40 hrs on 02.12.2020. You failed to ensure proper setting of
route during shunting movement resulted in bursting point no. 102B. You have violated GR
5.13(2) and SR 5.13.06.
By the above act of Shri Sunil Kumar Sahu, ALP of CCC/Loco/BMY has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri A.K.Panda, SSE of C&W/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri A.K.Panda, SSE of C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Shri A.K.Panda, SSE of C&W/BIA.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were booked for TO dep at 21:15 hrs on 01-12-2020 and bursted point no.
1
102B while performing shunting operation at P/Cab-Exchange yard at 04:40 hrs on 02-12-
2020 with Loco No. 70583/WDG4D/ABR. As per the Sr.Supervisor level joint inquiry
report of Raipur Division, you were held secondary responsible for bursting of Point No.102
B at P.Cabin/Ex Yard at 04:40 hrs on 02.12.2020. You failed to ensure proper setting of
route during shunting movement resulted in bursting point no. 102B. You have violated GR
5.13(2) and SR 5.13.06.
By the above act of Shri A.K.Panda, SSE of C&W/BIA has failed to maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Devendra Kumar, Helper/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Devendra Kumar, Helper/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-
parte.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Devendra Kumar,
Helper/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
As pe the report of CCC/Loco/DRZ, you were under unauthorized absent from 01-01-2021
1
to till date. prior to this period of unauthorized absent, you were under sick(PMC)from
25.11.2020 to 31.12.2020 and failed to submit the progress report to the office.You voilated
the conduct rules.This shows gross negligence in your part of duty.
This shows gross negligence on duty in your part.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Surendra Prasad, LPG/CCC/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Surendra Prasad, LPG/CCC/Loco/Raipur ex-
parte.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Annexure-I
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Surendra Prasad,
LPG/CCC/Loco/Raipur.
You were held responsible by JS level officer inquiry of SBP division of EcoR for
1
the incident of dasing of SKF end down advance starter at TIG station of ECoR by Train No.
BCN/KNGK on 15-12-2020 at 07:00 hrs. The dashing occurred due to hitting of opened
door wagon no. ECoR 3121189286 at left side which has defective locking arrangement &
secured by GI wire. Subsequently the wire got damaged, cut and resulting in opening of door
during run. The opened door infringed SOD of signal implantation & dashed with signal post
and uprooted it. GDR check of the rake was conducted by you at MNDH. You failed to
ensure proper locking of flap doors of empty wagons at the time of GDR check. You
violated IRCA Pt-III 3, 6, 2 & SR 4.34.03.
By the above act of Sri Surendra Prasad, LPG/CCC/Loco/Raipur has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Rahul Kumar, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Rahul Kumar, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/Raipur ex-
parte.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 14-05-2021, you were booked for TO at 15:15 hrs with Sri Vijay Kumar,
1
LPG/R. You have worked Train No: BRN/E from MNDH departure at 17:30 hrs. SCR
highlighted the matter that ALP has no LR in the section from G/Cab to Exchange yard/BIA
when the train arrived G/Cabin station at 18:35 hrs. The said train got detained at G/Cabin
from 18:35 hrs to 20:30 hrs for arranging DI to provide LR to ALP in the section.
Crew have to inform their respective CCC if LR in any section is going to be overdue
or becomes overdue in advance. You failed to inform the matter to CC about the sections in
which LR is over due. Neither you informed the matter of “No LR” to DPC nor submitted
any memo to SCR resulted in delay for arranging required staff for providing section LR.
The said got detained due to your negligence and violation of rules.
By the above act of Sri Rahul Kumar, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/Raipur has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri P.K.Pracheta, LP(Pass)/Raipur is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri P.K.Pracheta, LP(Pass)/Raipur fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri P.K.Pracheta, LP(Pass)/Raipur ex-parte.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CC/Raipur, on date 23-04-2021 you were booked for TO dep at
1
01:15 hrs of Train No. LE/SLR and call book was served by the lobby staff. You refused the
TO on call book and demanded night rest. On scrutinizing the records it was noted that you
have availed PR (30 hrs) on 17-04-2021 after Sign Off at 18:00 hrs on 16-04-2021. As per
the provisions of HOER, periodical rest is provided for running staff but no provision is
available for “night rest” for running staff. The train was detained as the crew position was
acute on date.
You had refused TO on call book several times in the past without valid reasons. You
become habitual to refuse TOs on call book. Refusing TOs is a serious offence as it may
badly effect the train movement and serious violation of conduct rules. Refusing TO on call
book, demanding night rest out of rules and arguments with lobby staff is a serious offence
and shows gross negligence.
By the above act of Sri P.K.Pracheta, LP(Pass)/Raipur has failed to maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You have been spared for Practical loco handling of 1000 KM from 12-05-2021 under
1
the guidance of Sri H.K.Yadav, CLI/BIA. You had neither contact your nominated CLI nor
do any practical loco handling in the section up to 14-05-2021. As per the report of
CCC(Loco)/BIA, you have been advised to contact your nominated CLI for practical loco
handling when you contact CCC on phone on date 14-05-2021 and also advised to report
office in the morning if any problem.
You directly called over mobile phone to Sr DEE(OP)/R at 21:00 hrs on 14-05-2021
and argued by using unparliamentary language. You failed to do the practical loco handling
in the section and did not inform the day to day progress report to your nominated CLI /
CCC. Calling higher authorities without valid reason during night hours is a serious offence.
You called higher authorities for the matters that can be resolved at Supervisor level. This is
purely violation of conduct rules.
By the above act of Sri Bansidhar Choudhary, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed to maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri M.K.Goswami, LP/CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri M.K.Goswami, LP/CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri M.K.Goswami, LP/CCC/Loco/R ex-parte.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 21-05-2021, you were booked for TO dep at 18:15 hrs. You have worked
1
Train No: N/BMY from RSD, departure at 23:29 hrs. Train arrived R-Yard/BMY at 00:22
hrs. After dropping the train at R-Yard, LE allowed to I-Cabin at 03:15 hrs. You refused to
start the train stating that no LR in the section beyond R-Yard.
Crew have to inform their respective CCC if LR in any section is going to be overdue
or becomes overdue in advance. You failed to inform the matter to CC about the sections in
which LR is over due. Neither you informed the matter of “No LR” to DPC nor submitted
any memo to SCR. The said got detained due to your negligence and violation of rules.
By the above act of Sri M.K.Goswami, LP/CCC/Loco/R has failed to maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri R.K.Banjare, ALP/CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri R.K.Banjare, ALP/CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri R.K.Banjare, ALP/CCC/Loco/R ex-parte.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 21-05-2021, you were booked for TO dep at 18:15 hrs with
1
Shri M.K.Goswami, LPG/R. You have worked Train No: N/BMY from RSD, departure at
23:29 hrs. Train arrived R-Yard/BMY at 00:22 hrs. After dropping the train at R-Yard, LE
allowed to I-Cabin at 03:15 hrs. You refused to start the train stating that no LR in the
section beyond R-Yard.
Crew have to inform their respective CCC if LR in any section is going to be overdue
or becomes overdue in advance. You failed to inform the matter to CC about the sections in
which LR is over due. Neither you informed the matter of “No LR” to DPC nor submitted
any memo to SCR. The said train got detained due to your negligence and violation of rules
By the above act of Sri R.K.Banjare, ALP/CCC/Loco/R has failed to maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri M.K.Patil, LP/CCC/Loco/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri M.K.Patil, LP/CCC/Loco/BMY fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri M.K.Patil, LP/CCC/Loco/BMY ex-parte.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 22-05-2021, you were booked for TO dep at 20:30 hrs. You have worked Train No:
1
N/WRS from BMY. Starter signal of KMI station was taken OFF at 05:30 hrs. SCR
informed at 05:35 hrs that LP was not started the train from KMI station. DPC/R asked you
to start the train but you refused to start the train and demanded relief crew. Finally starter
signal was raised at 05:45 hrs.
You have completed only 9:30 hrs duty from Sign On time and the destination of the train is
RSD. You failed to obey the instructions of on duty DPC and refused to start the train for
which the destination is about 30 minutes journey from KMI. The train got detained due to
your negligence and violation of rules.
By the above act of Sri M.K.Patil, LP/CCC/Loco/BMY has failed to maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Shri N.K.Sahu, SSE/C&W/RSD is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Shri N.K.Sahu, SSE/C&W/RSD fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable
to be passed against Shri N.K.Sahu, SSE/C&W/RSD.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per report of DME/R, on date 14.12.2020 you were nominated for revalidation
1
work of N/PACT at MRLB/BYT with 04 staff. Nominaated staff reached the site at 17:20
hrs but you were not even turn up for site nor responding the phone calls. As a result
assigned work was not executed due to your irresponsible and reluctant behavior. Such
reckless and indiscipline behavior from a supervisor is intolerable. You were failed to
follow the instructions given by the Railway administration.
By the above act of Shri N.K.Sahu, SSE/C&W/RSD has failed to maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(ii)
(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under
R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(S.K.Senapati)
Design: Sr.DME(Co-Ord)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 29-07-2021, you were booked for TO dep at 10:00 hrs. You had worked Train
1
No. N/BIA from G/Cab-PP/CLY and MDLE has been allowed to RSD After dropping load
at CLY. Through signal has been given for your train at I/Cab/BMY, but you had stopped
the train at I/Cab at 17:10 hrs and demanded relief. You have performed only 07:40 hrs duty
from Sign ON and stopped the train on through signal. SCR & DPC have tried to convince
you to work the train but you refused to work further resulted in detention of train and badly
effected the yard movement at I/Cabin.
By the above act of Sri B.R.Chandrakar, LP/CCC/Loco/BMY has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri A.K.Dhrew, Shunter/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take action
against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri A.K.Dhrew, Shunter/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable
to be passed against Sri A.K.Dhrew, Shunter/DRZ ex-parte.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were booked for TO of DRZ yard shunting at 22:30 hrs on 02-07-2021. As per
1
joint finding report, you were held responsible for the derailment of Diesel Loco No.
70404/WDG4/R of Multi of 70404+70473/WDG4/R over the DS point no. 62A in DRZ yard
at about 04:10 hrs on 03-07-2021. While performing shunting movement in sick line of
DRZ yard to place one brake van with MU Loco No. 70404+70473, you moved the loco
without ensuring correct setting of point.
To reduce the shunting time, loco with brake van was allowed to stop before clearing of
point no. SL/1 and when it was required to set route for sick line no. 2, loco pulled forward
again without ensuring the setting of DS point no. 62A which was set normal and caused
insertion of leading wheel sets in open (Normal) DS point and got derailed. You had violated
G&SR 5.13.06 while performing shunting operation.
By the above act of Sri A.K.Dhrew, Shunter/DRZ has failed to maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(iii)
of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Dushyant Kumar Sahu,
LPG/CCC/Loco/BMY .
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were booked for TO of DRZ yard shunting at 22:30 hrs on 02-07-2021. As per
1
joint finding report, you were held responsible for the derailment of Diesel Loco No.
70404/WDG4/R of Multi of 70404+70473/WDG4/R over the DS point no. 62A in DRZ yard
at about 04:10 hrs on 03-07-2021. While performing shunting movement in sick line of
DRZ yard to place one brake van with MU Loco No. 70404+70473, you moved the loco
without ensuring correct setting of point.
To reduce the shunting time, loco with brake van was allowed to stop before clearing of
point no. SL/1 and when it was required to set route for sick line no. 2, loco pulled forward
again without ensuring the setting of DS point no. 62A which was set normal and caused
insertion of leading wheel sets in open (Normal) DS point and got derailed. You had violated
G&SR 5.13.06 while performing shunting operation.
By the above act of Sri Dushyant Kumar Sahu,LPG/CCC/Loco/BMY has failed to maintain
the devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the
provisions of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for
disciplinary action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You were booked for TO of DRZ yard shunting at 22:30 hrs on 02-07-2021. As per
1
joint finding report, you were held responsible for the derailment of Diesel Loco No.
70404/WDG4/R of Multi of 70404+70473/WDG4/R over the DS point no. 62A in DRZ yard
at about 04:10 hrs on 03-07-2021. While performing shunting movement in sick line of
DRZ yard to place one brake van with MU Loco No. 70404+70473, you moved the loco
without ensuring correct setting of point.
To reduce the shunting time, loco with brake van was allowed to stop before clearing of
point no. SL/1 and when it was required to set route for sick line no. 2, loco pulled forward
again without ensuring the setting of DS point no. 62A which was set normal and caused
insertion of leading wheel sets in open (Normal) DS point and got derailed. You had violated
G&SR 5.13.06 while performing shunting operation.
By the above act of Sri Rajan Kumar Baitha,ALP/CCC/Loco/BMY has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Vikash Gautam, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/R is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Vikash Gautam, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/R fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Vikash Gautam, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/R ex-parte.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
On date 17.09.2021, you were booked for shunting duty at RSD for the shift 22-06
1
hrs. You were held responsible for the derailment of multi Loco No.70034+12494/WDG4/R
over DS point no.72 which was in open condition at RSD yard.
While performing shunting operation with multi loco, you got confused by the horn
blown by another shunning loco which was moving ahead and started the loco without
ensuring correct setting of DS point no. 72 which was in open condition. You failed to stop
the loco before shunting signal no.26 which was at on condition lead to derailment of leading
loco no 70034. You did not even change the Loco cab & performed shunting from trailing
Loco cab.
You had violated G&SR 5.13 and failed to follow the shunting procedure for
movement of multi locos while performing shunting operation.
By the above act of Sri Vikash Gautam, Sr.ALP/CCC/Loco/R has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(J.K.Patra)
Design: ADME(O&F)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Kul Kamal Verma, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Kul Kamal Verma, LPS-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Kul Kamal Verma , LPS-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Kul Kamal Verma , LPS-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Kul Kamal Verma ,
LPS-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Kul Kamal Verma,
LPS-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ.
You have performed duty at lobby as booking clerk in 14-22 hrs shift on 28-12-202. As
1
the report of CC/DRZ, you were advised by CC/DRZ to undergone BA test on suspicious of
intoxic condition due to your behavior and activities. You ran away from the lobby and
remain absconded from duty during entire shift. You have accepted that you have consumed
alcohol in your written explanation submitted to CC/DRZ. You have violated G& 2.09 and
service conduct rules by absconding form duty.
By the above act of Sri Kul Kama Verma , LPS-I/CCC/Loco/DRZ has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri M.N.Rao, SSE/C&W/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take action
against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri M.N.Rao, SSE/C&W/BMY fails to submit his representation within the period specified
in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable
to be passed against Sri M.N.Rao, SSE/C&W/BMY ex-parte.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You have performed duty at lobby as booking clerk in 14-22 hrs shift on 28-12-202. As
1
the report of CC/DRZ, you were advised by CC/DRZ to undergone BA test on suspicious of
intoxic condition due to your behavior and activities. You ran away from the lobby and
remain absconded from duty during entire shift. You have accepted that you have consumed
alcohol in your written explanation submitted to CC/DRZ. You have violated G& 2.09 and
service conduct rules by absconding form duty.
By the above act of Sri M.N.Rao, SSE/C&W/BMY has failed to maintain the devotion to duty
and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(iii)
of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S
(D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ajit Kumar,Tech-I is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take action against
him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A
Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed to be
taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Ajit Kumar,Tech-I is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he/she
may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the
undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Ajit Kumar,Tech-I fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2,
it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will be liable to be
passed against Sri Ajit Kumar,Tech-I ex-parte.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
You have performed duty at lobby as booking clerk in 14-22 hrs shift on 28-12-202. As
1
the report of CC/DRZ, you were advised by CC/DRZ to undergone BA test on suspicious of
intoxic condition due to your behavior and activities. You ran away from the lobby and
remain absconded from duty during entire shift. You have accepted that you have consumed
alcohol in your written explanation submitted to CC/DRZ. You have violated G& 2.09 and
service conduct rules by absconding form duty.
By the above act of Sri Ajit Kumar,Tech-I has failed to maintain the devotion to duty and do
nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS
(Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action under R S (D&A)
Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Bhekh Lal Gautam, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Bhekh Lal Gautam, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Bhekh Lal Gautam, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Bhekh Lal Gautam, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Bhekh Lal Gautam,
LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Bhekh Lal Gautam,
LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA.
By the above act of Sri Bhekh Lal Gautam, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Prem Kumar, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Prem Kumar, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Prem Kumar, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA ex-parte.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
By the above act of Sri Prem Kumar, LPG/CCC/Loco/BIA has failed to maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Utpal De)
Design: Sr.DEE(OP)/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ajit Kumar, Tech-I/SSE/C&W/Durg is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
1. If Sri Ajit Kumar, Tech-1/SSE/C&W/Durg fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Ajit Kumar, Tech-I/SSE/C&W/Durg ex-parte.
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Ajit Kumar, Tech-
I/SSE/C&W/Durg.
As per Sr.DPO/R’s letter no:- E/PB/R/IRM/2014/07 Date 11.04.2022, it was asked to take
1
D&A action against you on account of violation of service conduct rule no 20. You have
committed serious misconduct as you had approached to other authorities for
redressal of service related grievances duly bypassing prescribed channel of
communication. Thus, you had violated the provision of Rule no 20 of Railway
Service (Conduct Rule).
By the above act of Sri Ajit Kumar, Tech-I/SSE/C&W/Durg has failed to maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Tomesh Kalihari, JE/C&W/BIA is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Tomesh Kalihari, JE/C&W/BIA fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Tomesh Kalihari, JE/C&W/BIA ex-parte.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
The said wagon was examined by you on date 13-12-2021Exchange Yard/BIA. But
the said rake was not examined as per the procedure manual and violated Rule No. 3.9.3.5
and ‘S’ 4.5.1 of IRCA part III causing above wagan got derailed at SBC Yard.
Kkiu@MEMORANDUM
1 Jh isze dqekj ¼inuke½ fo|qr yksdks pkyd ¼xqM~l½ ¼dk;kZy; ftlesa dke djrk
gks½ eq[; pkydny fu;a=d@HkkVkikjk dks ,rn~ }kjk lwfpr fd;k tkrk gS fd fuEu
LogLrk{kjh }kjk mlds fo:) jsy lsod ¼vuq'kklu vkSj vihy½ fu;e 1968 ds fu;e II ds
varxZr dkjZokbZ djus dh izLFkkiuk dh xbZ gSA nqO;Zogkj o vopkj ds ykaNuksa
dk ,d fooj.k layXu gSaA ftl ij mi;qDr dkjZokbZ djus dh izLRFkkiuk gSA
Shri Prem Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods) (Name, designation and office in which working) Chief Crew
Controller/Bhatapara hereby informed that the undersigned proposes to take action against him under rule II of the
Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1968. A statement of the imputation of misconduct or misbehaviour, on
which action is proposed to be taken, is given overleaf.
2 Jh isze dqekj ¼inuke½ fo|qr yksdks pkyd ¼xqM~l½ dks ,rn~ }kjk ;g volj fn;k
tkrk gS fd bl izLrko ds fo:) og tks Hkh vH;kosnu nsuk pkgs os nasA vH;kosnu ;fn
nsuk gks] fuEugLrk{kjh dks bl rjg izLrqr fd;k tkuk pkfg, rkfd og bl Kkiu dh izkfIr
ds nl fnu ds Hkhrj igq¡p tk,A
Shri Prem Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods) is hereby given an opportunity to make such representation as he may to make
against the proposal. The representation, if any, should be submitted to the undersigned so as to reach within ten days of
receipt of this memorandum.
3 ;fn Jh isze dqekj ¼inuke½ fo|qr yksdks pkyd ¼xqM~l½ iSjk 2 esa fofufnZ"V vof/k
ds Hkhrj vH;kosnu izLrqr ugha djrs rks ;g eku fy;k tk,xk fd mUgsa dksbZ
vH;kosnu ugha nsuk gS vkSj Jh isze dqekj ¼inuke½ fo|qr yksdks pkyd ¼xqM~l½
ds fo:) ,di{kh; vkns'k tkjh fd, tk ldsaxsA
If Shri Prem Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods) fails to submit his representation within the period specified in para 2, it will be
presumed that he has no representation to make and orders will be liable, to be passed against Shri Prem Kumar, ex-
parte.
4 Jh isze dqekj ¼inuke½ fo|qr yksdks pkyd ¼xqM~l½ bl Kkiu dh ikorh nsaA
The receipt of this memorandum should be acknowledged by Shri Prem Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods).
gLrk{kj@Signature ..........................................
uke@Name : [Utpal De]
Sr. Divl. Elect. Engineer(OP)/SECR/Raipur
¼l{ke vf/kdkjh dk uke vkSj inuke½
(Designation of the Competent Authority)
lsok esa]@To
Jh isze dqekj ¼ih-,Q-u- 06AB0321½ ¼inuke½ fo|qr yksdks pkyd ¼xqM~l½@eq[; dzq
daVªksyj@HkkVkikjk]/Sri Prem Kumar, Loco Pilot (Goods)/CCC/Bhatapara ¼jsy deZpkjh dk uke vkSj
dk;kZy;½@Name, Designation and office of the Railway servant)
Copy to: 1. Sr.DPO/Raipur for information.
2. DEE(OP&TRD)/R and ADEE(OP)/BIA & CCC/BIA for information.
3. CCC/BYT Raipur for information and serving of copy by taking acknowledgment.
SF-11(Contd.)
P.T.O.
gLrk{kj@Signature ..........................................
uke@Name : [Utpal De]
Sr. Divl. Elect. Engineer(OP)/SECR/Raipur
¼l{ke vf/kdkjh dk uke vkSj inuke½
(Designation of the Competent Authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby informed that the undersigned
purposes to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and
Appeal) Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which
action is proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/DURG fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/DURG ex-
parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma,
SSE/C&W/DURG .
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the joint finding report issued by Sr DSO/R, you are held Primarily responsible
1
for not ensuring proper securing of wire ropes and locking of coach doors of Train no-POH
E/ Rake which was come from MXA and placed in pit-2 at coacing depot Durg for PME
examination. During examination of the rake, under gear, brake power checking and closing
of doors were ensured by you on 10.04.2022. As a result during movement of train, door of
RS Coach got opened and iron wire came out side the coach & hanged and finally hit the
ancohor guy rod of OHE Mast at Km 751/26A causing damage of bracket insulator, AFD
rod and grounding of Counter weight in Down line at KM No. 751/26A in the section
between BYT – NPI on 10-04-2022.
The rake was PME examined under your supervision at Durg yard. You have failed for not
ensuring proper securing of wire ropes and locking of coach doors.
By the above act of Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/DURG has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Murlidhar Tata, SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Murlidhar Tata, SSE/C&W/DURG fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Murlidhar Tata, SSE/C&W/DURG ex-parte.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the joint finding report issued by Sr DSO/R, you are held Secondarily
1
responsible for not ensuring proper locking of coach doors of Train no-POH/Spl at Durg
Yard Line No-2 during issuing of BPC on 10.04.2022. As a result during movement of train,
door of RS Coach got opened and iron wire came out side the coach & hanged and finally
hit the ancohor guy rod of OHE Mast at Km 751/26A causing damage of bracket insulator,
AFD rod and grounding of Counter weight in Down line at KM No. 751/26A in the section
between BYT – NPI on 10-04-2022.
The BPC of said POH/E/Rake/BSP was issued under your supervision at Durg yard.
You have failed to ensure proper locking of coach doors at Durg before issuing the BPC.
By the above act of Sri Murlidhar Tata, SSE/C&W/DURG has failed to maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
Sri Ajay Kumar Sharma, SSE/C&W/Durg
As per the joint finding report issued by Sr DSO/R, you were held primarily responsible for the incident
of grounding of OHE counter weight and shearing of bracket insulator in Down line at KM No. 751/26A
in the section between BYT – NPI on 10-04-2022 resulted in hanging of OHE wire at KM No. 751/08-
751/04. It was occurred due to iron wire hanging from RS coach which hit with anchor guy rod of OHE
mast at KM No.751/26A. The iron wire rope was not properly secured inside the RS coach and door of
the RS coach was also not properly closed & locked resulted the iron wire rope came outside the coach.
The PME examination of said POH/E/Rake/BSP was conducted under your supervision at Coaching
Depot/Durg. You failed to ensure proper securing of wire ropes inside coaches while examination.
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
3. If Sri Chandrasekhar Mohanty, JE/C&W/BMY fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Chandrasekhar Mohanty, JE/C&W/BMY ex-
parte.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the joint enquiry report issued by Sr.DSO/BSP, you were held responsible
1
for the incident took place in the section between BDWA-GGT on 26.05.2022 at KM No.
923/19-21 of Train No. N-789/up juggler. One wheel set (out of 9 wheel set) got slipped and
fallen down which was loaded in Wagon No. SE 10079861436/BOXNMI loaded (20 th from
brake van) at Km .No. 923/19-21 between BDWA-GGT on 26.05.2022 in BSP
Division/SECR.
9 nos. wheel sets were loaded on wagon no. SE 10079861436 at BMY Sick line on
13.04.2022 for Izzatnagar. Joint enquiry report concluded that the said wheel was not
properly secured by C&W staff at the loading point at BMY Sick line resulted the wheel set
slipped and hitted the door, got disturbed (might be due to lurching/jerks in the section
during run) and fallen down outside of the track.
You failed to ensure proper/correct securing of wheel sets inside the wagon while
loading at BMY sick line resulted the said incident.
By the above act of Sri Chandrasekhar Mohanty, JE/C&W/BMY has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Suresh suggu, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Suresh suggu, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Suresh suggu, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY ex-parte.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the joint enquiry report issued by Sr.DSO/BSP, you were held responsible for
1
the incident took place in the section between BDWA-GGT on 26.05.2022 at KM No.
923/19-21 of Train No. N-789/up juggler. One wheel set (out of 9 wheel set) got slipped and
fallen down which was loaded in Wagon No. SE 10079861436/BOXNMI loaded (20 th from
brake van) at Km .No. 923/19-21 between BDWA-GGT on 26.05.2022 in BSP
Division/SECR.
9 nos. wheel sets were loaded on wagon no. SE 10079861436 at BMY Sick line on
13.04.2022 for Izzatnagar. Joint enquiry report concluded that the said wheel was not
properly secured by C&W staff at the loading point at BMY Sick line resulted the wheel set
slipped and hitted the door, got disturbed (might be due to lurching/jerks in the section
during run) and fallen down outside of the track.
You failed to proper/correct securing of wheel sets inside the wagon while loading at
BMY sick line resulted the said incident.
By the above act of Sri Suresh suggu, Sr.Tech/C&W/BMY has failed to maintain the devotion
to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(A.Banerjee)
Design: Sr.DME/Raipur
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, JE/SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, JE/SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, JE/SSE/C&W/DURG fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, JE/SSE/C&W/DURG ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Fagu Ram Sahu,
JE/SSE/C&W/DURG .
¼,s- cuthZ½
Ofj-eaMy ;ka vfHk;ark ¼leao;½@jk;iqj
vuq'kklfud
çkf/kdkjh
Statement of imputations of misconduct or misbehavior framed against Sri Fagu Ram Sahu,
JE/SSE/C&W/DURG .
By the above act of Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, JE/SSE/C&W/DURG has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
¼,s- cuthZ½
Ofj-eaMy ;ka vfHk;ark ¼leao;½@jk;iqj
vuq'kklfud
çkf/kdkjh
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, JE/SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
2. Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, JE/SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby given an opportunity to make such
representation as he/she may wish to make against the proposal. The representation, if any,
should be submitted to the undersigned within ten days of receipt of this memorandum.
3. If Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, JE/SSE/C&W/DURG fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, JE/SSE/C&W/DURG ex-parte.
4. The receipt of this Memorandum should be acknowledged by Sri Fagu Ram Sahu,
JE/SSE/C&W/DURG.
¼,s- cuthZ½
Ofj-eaMy ;ka vfHk;ark ¼leao;½@jk;iqj
vuq'kklfud
çkf/kdkjh
As per the report of Sr. CDO/Durg, you were held responsible for the detachment Case
1
Coach No. 16118 SECR LWACCN of rake of Train No. 22867/68 at NZM during terminal
examination due to wheel shelling of wheel no. 08 of said coach.
The said rake has been given primary maintenance at Coaching Depot / Durg under
your supervision on 01.08.2022. You have failed to examine the rake of Train No.22867/68
intensively and thereby necessary maintenance while conducting primary maintenance at
Durg on 01.08.2022 resulted in detachment of one coach at NZM while terminal
maintenance at NZM due to wheel shelling.
This shows that gross negligence and poor workman ship on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Fagu Ram Sahu, JE/SSE/C&W/DURG has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
¼,s- cuthZ½
Ofj-eaMy ;ka vfHk;ark ¼leao;½@jk;iqj
vuq'kklfud
çkf/kdkjh
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(Anmol Ukey)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of Sr.CDO/Durg, you were held responsible for the detachment
Case Coach No. 16118 SECR LWACCN of rake of Train No. 22867/68 at NZM during
1
terminal examination due to wheel shelling of wheel no. 08 of said coach.
The said rake has been given primary maintenance at Coaching Depot / Durg on
01.08.2022 on pit line no:- 02. You have failed to examine the rake of Train No.22867/68
intensively and there by necessary maintenance while conducting primary maintenance at
Durg on 01.08.2022 resulted in detachment of one coach at NZM while terminal
maintenance at NZM due to wheel shelling.
This shows that gross negligence and poor workman ship on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Sanjeev Meshram, Tech-I/SSE/C&W/DURG has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Anmol Ukey)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Dilip Kumar, Helper/SSE/C&W/DURG is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes
to take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Dilip Kumar, Helper/SSE/C&W/DURG fails to submit his representation within the
period specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and
orders will be liable to be passed against Sri Dilip Kumar, Helper/SSE/C&W/DURG ex-parte.
(Anmol Ukey)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of Sr.CDO/Durg, you were held responsible for the detachment
Case Coach No. 16118 SECR LWACCN of rake of Train No. 22867/68 at NZM during
1
terminal examination due to wheel shelling of wheel no. 08 of said coach.
The said rake has been given primary maintenance at Coaching Depot / Durg on
01.08.2022 on pit line no:- 02. You have failed to examine the rake of Train No.22867/68
intensively and there by necessary maintenance while conducting primary maintenance at
Durg on 01.08.2022 resulted in detachment of one coach at NZM while terminal
maintenance at NZM due to wheel shelling.
This shows that gross negligence and poor workman ship on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Dilip Kumar, Helper/SSE/C&W/DURG has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Anmol Ukey)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
(Anmol Ukey)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CWC/R, you were held responsible for the detention of Train No.
1
N/BOX/E at UTCB/BKTH due to brake rigging problem of wagons on 24-08-2022.
The said rake was attended by you at BKYH from 00:40 to 06:00 hrs to release the
brakes of wagons. But you could not release the brakes resulted in detention of Train and the
case was logged in ICMS. You could not rectify the brake rigging trouble of wagons and
returned to HQ.
This shows that gross negligence and poor workman ship on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Kuldeep Shrivas,Tech-I/SSE/C&W/BYT has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Anmol Ukey)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Sukhdev,Tech-I /SSE/C&W/BYT is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to take
action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal) Rules,
1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is proposed
to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Sukhdev,Tech-I /SSE/C&W/BYT fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Sukhdev,Tech-I /SSE/C&W/BYT ex-parte.
(Anmol Ukey)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CWC/R, you were held responsible for the detention of Train
1
No. N/BOX/E at UTCB/BKTH due to brake rigging problem of wagons on 24-08-2022.
The said rake was attended by you at BKYH from 00:40 to 06:00 hrs to release the
brakes of wagons. But you could not release the brakes resulted in detention of Train and the
case was logged in ICMS. You could not rectify the brake rigging trouble of wagons and
returned to HQ.
This shows that gross negligence and poor workman ship on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Sukhdev,Tech-I /SSE/C&W/BYT has failed to maintain the devotion to
duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions of Rule
3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary action
under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Anmol Ukey)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
SOUTH EAST CENTRAL RAILWAY
Divisional Office
Mechanical Department
Raipur (C. G) - 492 008
MEMORANDUM
1. Sri Udho Prasad,Tech-I /SSE/C&W/BYT is hereby informed that the undersigned purposes to
take action against him/her under Rule 11 of the Railway Servants (Discipline and Appeal)
Rules, 1968. A Statement of the imputations of misconduct or misbehavior on which action is
proposed to be taken as mentioned above is enclosed.
3. If Sri Udho Prasad,Tech-I /SSE/C&W/BYT fails to submit his representation within the period
specified in para 2, it will be presumed that he/she has no representation to make and orders will
be liable to be passed against Sri Udho Prasad,Tech-I /SSE/C&W/BYT ex-parte.
(Anmol Ukey)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
As per the report of CWC/R, you were held responsible for the detention of Train No.
1
N/BOX/E at UTCB/BKTH due to brake rigging problem of wagons on 24-08-2022.
The said rake was attended by you at BKYH from 00:40 to 06:00 hrs to release the
brakes of wagons. But you could not release the brakes resulted in detention of Train and the
case was logged in ICMS. You could not rectify the brake rigging trouble of wagons and
returned to HQ.
This shows that gross negligence and poor workman ship on your part of duty.
By the above act of Sri Udho Prasad,Tech-I/SSE/C&W/BYT has failed to maintain the
devotion to duty and do nothing unbecoming a railway servant. Thus he/she contravened the provisions
of Rule 3.1(iii) of RS (Conduct) Rules, 1966 and thereby rendered her/him self liable for disciplinary
action under R S (D&A) Rules, 1968 as amended from time to time.
(Anmol Ukey)
Design: Sr.CDO/Durg
(Disciplinary authority)
Sampark Kranti Exp Train no. 12824 was inspected by Sr.DME(Co.)/R in between Raipur to Durg
station and found various deficiency related to passenger amenity ,hose keeping and maintenance
aspects. Some of the deficiencies observed are as under.
st
In AC 1 class Glass of the partition door is found broken, dark Stain near Rat Catcher and
Window/Door curtain are not properly maintained.
In B1 AC coach Dust bin cover is found deficient and cockroach found in dust bin.
In B5 AC coach Gravity Cock is found deficient and Window curtain are found hanging
Above deficiencies are has been badly commented by GM/SECR during his journey from NDLS to
BSP on dt. 12.06.2022. This show gross negligence in your duties and slackness in your supervision
hence you are hereby advice to check one primary train of Durg base daily
On 13.06.2022, during inspection of Sr.DME(Co.)/R of Train No. Train no. 12824 ( Durg-JAT
Exp.) between R-DURG station and found various deficiency related to passenger amenity, hose
keeping and maintenance aspects. Some of the deficiencies observed are as under.
1. In AC 1st class Glass of the partition door is found broken, dark Stain near Rat Catcher and
Window/Door curtain are not properly maintained.
2. In B1 AC coach Dust bin cover is found deficient and cockroach found in dust bin.
3. In B5 AC coach Gravity Cock is found deficient and Window curtain are found hanging
Above deficiencies has been badly commented by GM/SECR during his journey from NDLS to
BSP on dt. 12.06.2022.
The said rake was checked and made fit by you at Coaching Deport/Durg during primary
maintenance. You were responsible for the said irregularities of train as you failed to proper inspection
and issue necessary instructions for rectification the said irregularities during maintenance of train at
Coaching Depot/Durg. This shows gross negligence on duty in your part.