OK Rule 64 Reviewer
OK Rule 64 Reviewer
OK Rule 64 Reviewer
APPLICABILITY
Section 1. Scope. OF —RULE
This 64Rule shall govern the review of judgments and
--> final
Rule orders
64 governs the review
or resolutions of the of Commission
judgments, final orders,
on Elections or
and the
Commission on Audit. (n)
resolutions of the —
Section 2. Mode of review. — A judgment or final order or resolution of
1.the
Commission
Commission on Elections (COMELEC)
on Elections and the Commission on Audit may be
2.brought
Commissionby the aggrieved party to the Supreme Court on certiorari
on Audit (COA)
under Rule 65, except as hereinafter provided. (n; Bar Matter No.
--> 803,
Rule 1764February
does NOT apply to the Civil Service Commission (CSC). The
1998)
proper mode
1987 CONSTITUTION
to contest the judgment, final order, or resolution of the CSC
is to fileIX-A
ARTICLE a petition
— COMMONforPROVISIONS
review under Rule 43 with the CA as per R43, Civil
Section
Service 7. XXXXX Unless otherwise provided by this Constitution or by
Law,.
law, any decision, order, or ruling of each Commission may be brought
--> to
MODEthe OF REVIEW:
Supreme Via on
Court Petition for Certiorari
certiorari by the in accordance with R65
aggrieved party within
RULE:thirty days from
A PARTY receipt of a
AGGRIEVED BYcopyTHEthereof.
JUDGMENT, FINAL ORDER, OR
RESOLUTION OF THE COMELEC OR THE COA MAY FILE A PETITION
FOR CERTIORARI UNDER RULE 65 WITH THE SUPREME COURT.
--> Thus, if the mode of review is a petition for certiorari under Rule 65, then
this means that the judgments or final orders of the COMELEC or COA
referred to in Rule 64 are NOT reviewable by appeal by the courts.
Because when appeal is available, certiorari is not the proper remedy.
--> RIANO: Rule 64 only applies to judgments, final orders, or resolutions of
the COMELEC or the COA and NOT interlocutory orders. Thus, when a
petition for certiorari is directed against an interlocutory order of the
commission, Rule 65 should apply.
--> Rule 64 points to the application of Rule 65 on a petition for certiorari,
thus, Rule 65 provide the rules to be applied under Rule 64, however, there
are slight differences in R64 & R65—
RULE 64 VS RULE 65
RULE 64 RULE 65
RELIEF Purpose is to annul or modify the judgment, final orders, or
PRAYED resolutions of such tribunal or bodies when there is a grave
FOR abuse of jurisdiction amounting to lack or excess of
jurisdiction and there is no other plain, speedy, and
adequate remedy
DIRECTED ONLY against the Judgment, final order,
AGAINST judgments, final orders resolution, interlocutory
or resolutions of the order, or proceedings of any
COMELEC or COA tribunal, board or officer in
--> Interlocutory orders the exercise of either —
are NOT included 1. Judicial
2. Quasi-judicial functions
PERIOD Filed within 30 days from Filed within 60 days from notice
TO FILE notice of judgment, final of the judgment, final order,
PETITION order or resolution or resolution sought to be
reviewed
EFFECT The filing of an MR or MNT, The period within which to file
OF if allowed (by the Rules the petition, if the MR or MNT
FILING AN of the COMELEC or COA) is denied, is still a fresh
MR interrupts the period period of 60 days from notice
OR MNT for the filing of a of the denial of the motion.
petition for certiorari. --> Fresh period Rule under
--> If the motion is denied, Neypes case appliess.
the aggrieved party
may file the petition
within the remaining
period, but not less than
5 days reckoned from
the notice of denial (no
fresh period)
COURT Supreme Court Next level court. Observe the
WITH principle of hierarchy of
JURISDICT courts
ION
ISSUES
Section TO
5. BE RESOLVED
Form and contents of petition. — XXXXXX Findings of fact of
the Commission supported by substantial evidence shall be final and
non-reviewable. XXXXXX