Practical Training - Trend Research
Practical Training - Trend Research
IT Trends Research
Trainee Information
Student Name
Student ID
Student CRN
Major
e-mail
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia المملكة العربية السعودية
Ministry of Education وزارة التعليم
Saudi Electronic University الجامعة السعودية االلكترونية
Abstract
1. Introduction
Today, digital technologies strongly affect society and how companies run their
businesses,
software and application development process but lack knowledge about
programming languages. LCDPs and NCDPs offer a development experience
based on visual and drag- and-drop techniques rather than traditional
programming languages (Outsystem, 2019), which is heavily reduced, favoring a
faster deployment of software and applications and the predisposition of multi-
level workflows (Prinz et al., 2021). Such technologies have the potential to
democratize IT by accelerating programmers’ activity and allowing the
participation of several stakeholders in the software and applications
development process. Accordingly, users with little knowledge of traditional
programming languages learn how to create the products they need without
writing code.
By focusing on the impact of LCDPs and NCDPs on organizational
dynamics, this study would like to answer the following question: How does
LCDPs/NCDPs implementation affect the cooperation between IT and business
experts?
More in detail, the research aims to understand the impact of LCDPs/NCDPs
implementation on business dynamics with specific reference to the cooperation
– meaning collaboration and communication - between business and IT experts
in developing specific activities to reach their business goals. Due to the topic’s
novelty, the author was encouraged to adopt an explorative research approach by
developing a case study strategy (Yin, 2018) and implementing a purposive
sampling technique (Patton, 2002) that facilitated data collection from key
informants. Such an approach helped the authors to have a deeper understanding
of the direct experience of using these platforms and the changes they have
brought inside the companies allowing the contamination of knowledge between
experts.
The subsequent sections of this article review the literature on LCDPs and
NCDPs by addressing the gap the study aims to fill. The methodology section
describes the qualitative
2. Literature Review
2.1. LCDPs and NCDPs characteristics
Today, it is critical for firms to adapt their strategy and way of working to the
unpredictable environment in which they operate (Yan, 2021; OutSystems,
2019). The rapid development of IT and the speed of digital transformation
require new tools to face the volatility of the environment and support internal
changes (Yan, 2021; Sanchis et al., 2020).
Digital transformation encourages companies to shift from a time-
consuming working method to an agile approach based on digital technologies
(Alsaadi et al., 2021). Such an approach suggests a more flexible way of working
and favors seizing new market opportunities and satisfying customers’ requests
by staying competitive (OutSystems, 2019).
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia المملكة العربية السعودية
Ministry of Education وزارة التعليم
Saudi Electronic University الجامعة السعودية االلكترونية
3. Methodology
3.1. Qualitative research and Case-based research strategy
The topic’s novelty encourages a deeper analysis of the subject by applying a
qualitative explorative research approach which “aims to achieve an in-depth
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia المملكة العربية السعودية
Ministry of Education وزارة التعليم
Saudi Electronic University الجامعة السعودية االلكترونية
transcribed, and integrated with secondary data sources (e.g., reports on the
companies’ websites, other documents gathered from the internet, and private
documents provided by informants) to respect the data triangulation principle
(Yin, 2018). In addition, based on key informants’ requests, their profiles and
those of their companies were anonymized by excluding any possible identifying
information.
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia المملكة العربية السعودية
Ministry of Education وزارة التعليم
Saudi Electronic University الجامعة السعودية االلكترونية
Decreased Costs Ability to build more apps in less time, costs decrease, as well
as the need for professional developers, reducing/eliminating
hiring costs.
Cross-Platform Applications can be deployed across a range of devices.
Functionality
Vendor Lock-In The strict dependency on platforms’ providers (Vendor lock-in)
[Platform Providers’ varies from vendor to vendor. It is sometimes complicated for
Dependency] users to maintain an application outside the vendor platform, as
the vendor sometimes impedes making App/software changes
once the user stops using its platform.
Customization Customization options vary between platforms. LCDPs generally
offer less limited customization than NCDPs, allowing users to
customize some aspects of their app/software using hand coding.
In contrast, NCDPs do not provide this possibility.
Integration with The easy integration of new apps/software developed with
Other Tools Already LCDPs/NCDPs with other apps and software adopted by the user.
Adopted
Easy changes The quick adaptation of apps/software to suit new requirements
facilitates immediate modifications when necessary, according to
market changes or customer needs.
Better The effects of increased speed in innovating business processes
Customer and apps deliver favor better customer experience.
Experience
Faster Digital Removal of complexity from building great, modern business
Transformation apps/software accelerating the adoption of useful technology.
Collaboration LCDPs and NCDPs can make everyone in the organization more
between IT and productive. Accordingly, it can help bring IT and Business
Business Departments departments closer, intensifying dialogue and mutual support.
Source: author’s elaboration
Therefore, twelve cards were developed and adopted to conduct the game (Figure 1)
during the semi-structured interview with the key informants
Figure 1 – Cards adopted during the interviews with key-informants
Figma
Overview:
Figma is a cloud-based design tool that allows teams to collaborate in real-time on user
interface (UI) and user experience (UX) design projects. It is widely used for creating
prototypes, wireframes, and design systems.
Key Features:
1. Real-Time Collaboration:
2. Cloud-Based Accessibility:
o Being cloud-based means that Figma can be accessed from any device
with an internet connection. This eliminates the need for local
installations and ensures that team members can work from anywhere.
3. Design Tools:
4. Prototyping:
Use Cases:
Figma is primarily used by UI/UX designers, product teams, and creative agencies for
designing websites, applications, and digital products. Its collaborative nature makes it
ideal for remote teams.
Agora
Overview:
Agora is a real-time engagement platform that provides APIs and SDKs for embedding
voice and video communication capabilities into applications. It is designed to facilitate
high-quality audio and video interactions.
Key Features:
1. Real-Time Communication:
o Agora enables seamless audio and video calls, live streaming, and
interactive broadcasting, allowing users to connect in real-time without
noticeable latency.
3. Multi-Platform Support:
4. Scalability:
6. Low Latency:
Use Cases:
Agora is commonly used in applications such as telehealth, online education, virtual
events, gaming, and social networking platforms. Its robust features make it a go-to
choice for developers looking to add real-time communication to their applications.
integrated with other external tools, thus making them more valuable and
particularly suited to companies’ business purposes.
Even describing the advantages and critical aspects of NCDPs’ by following
different storytelling (Figure 2), with the adoption of such strategic tools, the
companies aim at accelerating the company’s digitalization to offer a better
customer experience to their clients. All the aspects described during the
interview, also thanks to the application of the card-based game method, are
factors linked to customer satisfaction achievement. Indeed, it emerged that
NCDPs not only favor facing customers’ requests made volatile due to the
pervasiveness of digital technologies, but they also ensure the possibility of
quickly accessing the required functionalities due to rapid prototyping.
Figure 2 − LCDPS/NCDPS critical aspects described by companies
Source: authors’ elaboration on the Card-based game method results
management. The NCDPs have also decreased costs and implemented quicker
application development and process automation by reducing the time and effort
on a single project.
7. Theoretical and Managerial Implications.
The analysis of the outcomes suggests some theoretical and managerial
implications. From the theoretical point of view, the study contributes to the
managerial literature by confirming the importance of low-code technologies,
with specific reference to NCDPs as tools that support companies’ process
automation and digital transformation. Moreover, according to the study’s
objectives, it has been possible to contribute to analyzing the impact of NCDPs
implementation regarding social aspects. Indeed, they represent inclusive tools
that allow companies to implement a citizen developer strategy. Such strategy is
sometimes a goal that the companies set up at a certain point in their lives to start
a transformation that can help them to maintain their competitiveness and
respond to context changes. Other times, it is a step to make departments/units
inside a company closer to developing projects and improving communication.
Accordingly, NCDPs favor the involvement of resources with different skills in
the process of solutions’ creation representing tools that encourage cooperation
and a stimulus for knowledge contamination. Therefore, the results of this study
contribute to the literature dedicated to the impact of No-code technologies on
social aspects related to the work of human resources employed in the firms.
From the managerial point of view, the article’s evidence shows the
importance of these technologies in the cooperation between employees,
especially concerning IT and business experts. Such technologies stimulate
dialogue between the two units, favoring knowledge contamination. Indeed,
these two units generally speak a different language due to the lack of IT
knowledge on the business side and the lack of knowledge about business
processes on the IT one. By implementing the NCDPs, firms have the
opportunity not only to introduce a tool that increases the competitiveness of the
firms by facilitating speediness in application and software development but to
positively affect the employees’ daily activities creating synergies between
different roles.
number of cases involved in the analysis. Indeed, the second limitation concerns
the implementation of a qualitative methodology by focusing on a limited
number of cases. Implementing a case study strategy based on interviews and the
card-game-based method represented an innovative methodology that has never
been applied to LCDPs/NCDPs adoption studies. This methodology has been
instrumental in identifying the most critical aspects of the phenomenon
according to the key informants’ points of view. In addition, the rigor in
developing (and describing) the detailed procedure for implementing the case-
study strategy has favored data collection
Building on the limitations of this article, future researchers should extend
the analysis of LCDPs and NCDPs’ impact from a social point of view,
considering benefits and clarifying criticalities in their implementation.
Moreover, developing a case study strategy should be supported by incrementing
the number of cases and integrating with a mixed- method approach to increase
the possibility of the results’ generalization.
Acknowledgment
This research was financed by the YERUN Research Mobility Awards (YRMA),
won by the author in 2021. The author would like to thank the “Young European
Research Universities Network” (YERUN) for providing financial and network
support for the project development.
References
1. Alsaadi, H. A., Radain, D. T., Alzahrani, M. M., Alshammari, W. F.,
Alahmadi, D. & Fakieh, B. (2021). Factors that affect the utilisation of low-
code development platforms: survey study. Romanian Journal of
Information Technology and Automatic Control, 31(3), 123-140.
2. Beranic, T., Rek, P., & Heričko, M. (2020). Adoption and usability of low-
code/no- code development tools, Proceedings of the Central European
Conference on Information and Intelligent Systems, 97-103.
3. Bernsteiner, R., Schlögl, S., Ploder, C., Dilger T. & Brecher, F. (2022).
Citizen vs. Professional Developers: Differences and Similarities of Skills
and Training Requirements for Low Code Development Platforms.
Iceri2022 Proceedings, 4257- 4264.
4. Chandran L. C., & Abdulla, M. S. (2022). A survey of Low-Code/No-Code
software development tools with an application. Working Paper,
IIMK/WPS/524/ITS/2022/08. Retrieved from
https://iimk.ac.in/uploads/publications/IIMK_WPS524ITS_2022_08Upload_
File.pdf
5. Conrad, L.Y. & Tucker, V.M. (2019). Making it tangible: hybrid card
sorting within qualitative interviews. Journal of Documentation, 75(2), 397-
416.
6. Cooper, D. R., & Schindler, P. S. (2014). Business research methods.
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia المملكة العربية السعودية
Ministry of Education وزارة التعليم
Saudi Electronic University الجامعة السعودية االلكترونية