0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Linear Programming Solution Methods

Uploaded by

kc920kc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views

Linear Programming Solution Methods

Uploaded by

kc920kc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 38

LINEAR PROGRAMMING SOLUTION METHODS

1
Presentation Outline
• Solution techniques
– Graphical solution
– Excel solver

2
Graphical Solution
• Possible with two decision variables
• Establish feasible region
– Constraints
• Optimal solution
– Objective function

3
Graphical Solution – Concentrate Production
• Objective function
max z = 4000x1 + 5000x2
Subject to:
1.0x1 + 1.5x2 ≤ 1,000,000
2.5x1 + 2.2x2 ≤ 3,000,000
1x1 + 0x2 ≥ 200,000
0x1 + 1x2 ≥ 300,000
1x1 + 0x2 ≤ 500,000
0x1 + 1x2 ≤ 800,000
1x1 + 0x2 ≥ 0
0x1 + 1x2 ≥ 0

4
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region
x2

• 1.0x1 + 1.5x2 = 1000000


• If x1 = 0, x2 = 667000
– (0, 667000)
• If, x2 = 0, x1 = 1000000
– (1000000, 0)

x1

5
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region

x2

• 2.5x1 + 2.2x2 = 3000000


• If x1 = 0, x2 = 1363636
– (0, 1363636)
• If, x2 = 0, x1 = 1200000
– (1200000, 0)

x1

6
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region

x2

• 1x1 + 0x2 = 200000


• (200000, 0)

x1

7
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region
x2

• 0x1 + 1x2 = 300000


• (0, 300000)

x1

8
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region
x2

• 1x1 + 0x2 = 500000


• (500000, 0)

x1

9
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region

x2

• 0x1 + 1x2 = 800000


• (0, 800000)

x1

10
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region

x2

x1

11
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region
x2

x1

12
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
• Optimum solution x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


– Corner point of feasible region
– Point of intersection
– Objective function
• Maximise z = 4000x1 + 5000x2

0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

13
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟏. 𝟓𝒙𝟐 = 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 x2 𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟏. 𝟓𝒙𝟐 = 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥 2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥 2 ≤ 500000
⟹ 𝑥1 = 200000 𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟓𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎

S𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑥1 = 200000 𝑖𝑛 1𝑥1 + 1.5𝑥2 = 1000000 ⟹ 𝑥1 = 500000


1000000 200000 S𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑥1 = 500000 𝑖𝑛 1𝑥1 + 1.5𝑥2 = 1000000
⟹ 𝑥2 = − = 533333.34
1.5 1.5 1000000 500000
⟹ 𝑥2 = − = 333333.34
𝑧 = 4000𝑥1 + 5000𝑥2 @ 𝑥1 = 200000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 533333.34 1.5 1.5
𝑧 = $3,466,666,667 𝑧 = 4000𝑥1 + 5000𝑥2 @ 𝑥1 = 500000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 333333.34
𝒛 = $𝟑, 𝟔𝟔𝟔, 𝟔𝟔𝟔, 𝟕𝟎𝟎

0𝑥1 + 1𝑥 2 ≥ 300000

x1

𝟎𝒙𝟏 + 𝟏𝒙𝟐 = 𝟑𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝟎𝒙𝟏 + 𝟏𝒙𝟐 = 𝟑𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎


𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟓𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎
⟹ 𝑥1 = 200000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 300000 ⟹ 𝑥1 = 500000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 300000
𝑧 = 4000𝑥1 + 5000𝑥2 @ 𝑥1 = 200000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 300000 𝑧 = 4000𝑥1 + 5000𝑥2 @ 𝑥1 = 500000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 300000
𝑧 = $2,300,000,000 𝑧 = $3,500,000,000
14
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
• Optimum solution x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


– Corner point of feasible region
– Point of intersection
– Objective function
• Assume: 4000x1 + 5000x2 =
2000000000

– If x1 = 0, x2 = 400000

– If x2 = 0, x1 = 500000

0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

15
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

16
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

17
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

18
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

19
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

20
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
• Point of intersection
– 1x1 + 0x2 = 500,000
– 1x1 + 1.5x2 = 1,000,000
– x1 = 500,000 tonne
– x2 = 333,333 tonne

21
Graphical Solution – Post Solution Analysis
• Binding constraints
– 1x1 + 0x2 ≤ 500,000
– 1x1 + 1.5x2 ≤ 1,000,000

22
Graphical Solution – Post Solution Analysis
• Non-binding constraints
– 1x1 + 0x2 ≥ 200,000
– 0x1 + 1x2 ≥ 300,000
– 0x1 + 1x2 ≤ 800,000
– 2.5x1 + 2.2x2 ≤ 3,000,000

23
Graphical Solution – Post Solution Analysis
• Redundant constraints
– 2.5x1 + 2.2x2 ≤ 3,000,000
– 0x1 + 1x2 ≤ 800,000

24
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem

𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑧 = 30𝑥1 + 20𝑥2


500𝑥1 + 100𝑥2 ≥ 1000000
200𝑥1 + 200𝑥2 ≥ 1200000
100𝑥1 + 400𝑥2 ≥ 1200000
1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 0
0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 0

25
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem

26
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem

27
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem

28
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem

29
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem
𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑧 = 30𝑥1 + 20𝑥2
500𝑥1 + 100𝑥2 ≥ 1000000
200𝑥1 + 200𝑥2 ≥ 1200000
100𝑥1 + 400𝑥2 ≥ 1200000
1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 0
0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 0

𝟓𝟎𝟎𝒙𝟏 + 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎


𝟐𝟎𝟎𝒙𝟏 + 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟏𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎
⟹ 𝑥1 = 2000 − 0.2𝑥2
S𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑥1 𝑖𝑛 200𝑥1 + 200𝑥2 = 1200000
200 2000 − 0.2𝑥2 + 200𝑥2 = 1200000
400000 − 40𝑥2 + 200𝑥2 = 1200000
1200000 400000
⟹ 𝑥2 = − = 5000
160 160
⟹ 𝑥1 = 2000 − 0.2 5000 = 1000

𝒛 = 𝟑𝟎𝒙𝟏 + 𝟐𝟎𝒙𝟐 @ 𝒙𝟏 = 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒙𝟐 = 𝟓𝟎𝟎𝟎


𝒛 = $𝟏𝟑𝟎, 𝟎𝟎𝟎

30
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

31
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

32
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

33
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

34
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

35
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

36
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

37
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

38

You might also like