0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views

Linear Programming Solution Methods

Uploaded by

kc920kc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views

Linear Programming Solution Methods

Uploaded by

kc920kc
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 38

LINEAR PROGRAMMING SOLUTION METHODS

1
Presentation Outline
• Solution techniques
– Graphical solution
– Excel solver

2
Graphical Solution
• Possible with two decision variables
• Establish feasible region
– Constraints
• Optimal solution
– Objective function

3
Graphical Solution – Concentrate Production
• Objective function
max z = 4000x1 + 5000x2
Subject to:
1.0x1 + 1.5x2 ≤ 1,000,000
2.5x1 + 2.2x2 ≤ 3,000,000
1x1 + 0x2 ≥ 200,000
0x1 + 1x2 ≥ 300,000
1x1 + 0x2 ≤ 500,000
0x1 + 1x2 ≤ 800,000
1x1 + 0x2 ≥ 0
0x1 + 1x2 ≥ 0

4
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region
x2

• 1.0x1 + 1.5x2 = 1000000


• If x1 = 0, x2 = 667000
– (0, 667000)
• If, x2 = 0, x1 = 1000000
– (1000000, 0)

x1

5
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region

x2

• 2.5x1 + 2.2x2 = 3000000


• If x1 = 0, x2 = 1363636
– (0, 1363636)
• If, x2 = 0, x1 = 1200000
– (1200000, 0)

x1

6
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region

x2

• 1x1 + 0x2 = 200000


• (200000, 0)

x1

7
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region
x2

• 0x1 + 1x2 = 300000


• (0, 300000)

x1

8
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region
x2

• 1x1 + 0x2 = 500000


• (500000, 0)

x1

9
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region

x2

• 0x1 + 1x2 = 800000


• (0, 800000)

x1

10
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region

x2

x1

11
Graphical Solution – Feasible Region
x2

x1

12
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
• Optimum solution x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


– Corner point of feasible region
– Point of intersection
– Objective function
• Maximise z = 4000x1 + 5000x2

0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

13
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟏. 𝟓𝒙𝟐 = 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎
𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 x2 𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟏. 𝟓𝒙𝟐 = 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥 2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥 2 ≤ 500000
⟹ 𝑥1 = 200000 𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟓𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎

S𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑥1 = 200000 𝑖𝑛 1𝑥1 + 1.5𝑥2 = 1000000 ⟹ 𝑥1 = 500000


1000000 200000 S𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑥1 = 500000 𝑖𝑛 1𝑥1 + 1.5𝑥2 = 1000000
⟹ 𝑥2 = − = 533333.34
1.5 1.5 1000000 500000
⟹ 𝑥2 = − = 333333.34
𝑧 = 4000𝑥1 + 5000𝑥2 @ 𝑥1 = 200000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 533333.34 1.5 1.5
𝑧 = $3,466,666,667 𝑧 = 4000𝑥1 + 5000𝑥2 @ 𝑥1 = 500000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 333333.34
𝒛 = $𝟑, 𝟔𝟔𝟔, 𝟔𝟔𝟔, 𝟕𝟎𝟎

0𝑥1 + 1𝑥 2 ≥ 300000

x1

𝟎𝒙𝟏 + 𝟏𝒙𝟐 = 𝟑𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝟎𝒙𝟏 + 𝟏𝒙𝟐 = 𝟑𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎


𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝟏𝒙𝟏 + 𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟓𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎
⟹ 𝑥1 = 200000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 300000 ⟹ 𝑥1 = 500000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 300000
𝑧 = 4000𝑥1 + 5000𝑥2 @ 𝑥1 = 200000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 300000 𝑧 = 4000𝑥1 + 5000𝑥2 @ 𝑥1 = 500000 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑥2 = 300000
𝑧 = $2,300,000,000 𝑧 = $3,500,000,000
14
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
• Optimum solution x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


– Corner point of feasible region
– Point of intersection
– Objective function
• Assume: 4000x1 + 5000x2 =
2000000000

– If x1 = 0, x2 = 400000

– If x2 = 0, x1 = 500000

0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

15
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

16
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

17
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

18
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

19
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
x2

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 200000

1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≤ 500000


0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 300000

x1

20
Graphical Solution – Optimum Solution
• Point of intersection
– 1x1 + 0x2 = 500,000
– 1x1 + 1.5x2 = 1,000,000
– x1 = 500,000 tonne
– x2 = 333,333 tonne

21
Graphical Solution – Post Solution Analysis
• Binding constraints
– 1x1 + 0x2 ≤ 500,000
– 1x1 + 1.5x2 ≤ 1,000,000

22
Graphical Solution – Post Solution Analysis
• Non-binding constraints
– 1x1 + 0x2 ≥ 200,000
– 0x1 + 1x2 ≥ 300,000
– 0x1 + 1x2 ≤ 800,000
– 2.5x1 + 2.2x2 ≤ 3,000,000

23
Graphical Solution – Post Solution Analysis
• Redundant constraints
– 2.5x1 + 2.2x2 ≤ 3,000,000
– 0x1 + 1x2 ≤ 800,000

24
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem

𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑧 = 30𝑥1 + 20𝑥2


500𝑥1 + 100𝑥2 ≥ 1000000
200𝑥1 + 200𝑥2 ≥ 1200000
100𝑥1 + 400𝑥2 ≥ 1200000
1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 0
0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 0

25
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem

26
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem

27
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem

28
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem

29
Graphical Solution – Minimisation Problem
𝑚𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑒 𝑧 = 30𝑥1 + 20𝑥2
500𝑥1 + 100𝑥2 ≥ 1000000
200𝑥1 + 200𝑥2 ≥ 1200000
100𝑥1 + 400𝑥2 ≥ 1200000
1𝑥1 + 0𝑥2 ≥ 0
0𝑥1 + 1𝑥2 ≥ 0

𝟓𝟎𝟎𝒙𝟏 + 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎


𝟐𝟎𝟎𝒙𝟏 + 𝟐𝟎𝟎𝒙𝟐 = 𝟏𝟐𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎𝟎
⟹ 𝑥1 = 2000 − 0.2𝑥2
S𝑢𝑏𝑠𝑡𝑖𝑡𝑢𝑡𝑒 𝑥1 𝑖𝑛 200𝑥1 + 200𝑥2 = 1200000
200 2000 − 0.2𝑥2 + 200𝑥2 = 1200000
400000 − 40𝑥2 + 200𝑥2 = 1200000
1200000 400000
⟹ 𝑥2 = − = 5000
160 160
⟹ 𝑥1 = 2000 − 0.2 5000 = 1000

𝒛 = 𝟑𝟎𝒙𝟏 + 𝟐𝟎𝒙𝟐 @ 𝒙𝟏 = 𝟏𝟎𝟎𝟎 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒙𝟐 = 𝟓𝟎𝟎𝟎


𝒛 = $𝟏𝟑𝟎, 𝟎𝟎𝟎

30
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

31
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

32
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

33
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

34
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

35
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

36
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

37
Excel Solver – Concentrate Production

38

You might also like