Xii CH 8 Controlling Notes
Xii CH 8 Controlling Notes
Xii CH 8 Controlling Notes
MEANING OF CONTROLLING
‘Management control implies the measurement of accomplishment against the standard and the correction of deviations to assure attainment of
objectives according to plans’ – Koontz and O’ Donnel
Controlling is the measurement and correction of the performance of the subordinates to make sure that the enterprise objectives and plans devised to
attain them are being accomplished. Controlling is not the last function of management but, it is the function, which brings back the management
cycle back to the planning function.
Features of Controlling
2. Pervasive Function
3. Continuous Process
Importance of Controlling
Control is an indispensable function of management. A good control system helps an organization I the following ways: -
The controlling function brings to light the deviations, if any, from the goals and indicates corrective action. It thus, guides the organization
and keeps it on the right track so that organizational goals might be achieved.
An efficient control system keeps a careful check on the changes taking place in the organization and in the environment and helps to review
and revise the standards in light of such changes.
By exercising control, a manager seeks to produce wastage and spoilage of resources. Each activity is performed in accordance with
predetermined standards and norms.
A good control system ensures that employees know well in advance what they are expected to do and what the standards of performance for
their appraisal are. This motivates them and helps them give better performance.
Controlling helps to minimize dishonest behaviour on the part of the employees by keeping a close check on their activities. This creates on
atmosphere of order and discipline in the organization.
Controlling provides direction to all activities and efforts. Each department and employee is governed by predetermined standards which are
all coordinated with one another.
Relationship between Planning and Controlling
Once a plan become operational, controlling is necessary to monitor the progress, measure it, discover deviations and initiate corrective
measures to ensure that events confirm to plans.
If the standards are not set in advance, managers have nothing to control as controlling involves comparison of results with the standards.
When there is no plan, there is no basis of controlling.
(Standards of Performance)
(Feedback)
Planning prepares the ground for controlling and controlling provides information for the revision and formation of new plans. Thus, both
planning and controlling reinforce each other.
Planning is an intellectual process involving thinking and prescribing on appropriate course of action for achieving objectives. Controlling
checks whether decisions have been translated into desired action.
- Planning and Controlling are both backward – looking as well as forward – looking function
Plans are prepared for future and are based on forecasts about future conditions so, it’s forward looking. Controlling is like a postmortem of
past activities to find out deviations from the standards. So, its backward looking.
However, it should be understood that planning is guided by past experiences and the corrective action initiated by control function aims to
improve future performance. Thus, Planning and controlling are both backward looking was well as forward looking function.
Thus, Planning and Controlling are interrelated and reinforce each other in the sense that:
(a) Planning based on facts makes controlling easier and effective, and
(b) Controlling improve future planning by providing information derived from past experience.
Controlling Process
Standards are the criteria against which actual performance would be measured. They are the benchmarks towards which the organization
strives to work.
They can be set in both quantitative and quantitative terms, For eg:
Quantitative – Cost to be incurred, revenue to be earned, units to be sold, time to be spent on completion of a task etc.
As far as possible, manager should try to set standards in quantitative terms in order to facilitate their comparison with actual performance. In
case of qualitative standards, they should be defined in a manner to make measurement easier.
Standards should be flexible enough to be modified according to internal and external changes to business.
Performance should be measured in an objective and reliable manner and as far as possible, in the same units in which standards are set, to
make their comparison easier. Rather than measuring performance when the task is completed, it should be done during the performance,
wherever possible. This ensures continuous and formative monitoring. Several techniques can be used for measuring actual performance like:
- Performance reports Calculation of certain ratios like Gross Profit Ratio, Net Profit Ratio
Such comparison will reveal the deviation between actual and desired results. Comparison becomes easier when standards are set in
quantitative terms. For eg: performance of a worker in terms of units produced in a week can be easily measured against the standard output
for the week.
4. Analyzing Deviations
Some deviations are definitely expected in all activities so it’s important to determine the acceptable range of derivations. Also, deviations in
key areas need to be attended more urgently as compared those in insignificant areas. For this managers use the following:
They key result areas (KRAs), which are critical to the success of an organization, are set as critical points. If any thing goes wrong at
the critical points, the entire organization suffers. Therefore, control at such points is more important. For eg: In a manufacturing
organization, an increase of 5% in the labour cost may be more troublesome than a n 15% increase in postal changes.
Also called as control by exception is an important principle of management control based on the belief that – an attempt to control
everything results in controlling nothing. Thus, only significant deviations, which go beyond the permissible limit, should be brought to
the notice of management. For eg:
If acceptable range – 2% rise in labour cost, then only deviation beyond 2% say 5% rise, should be brought to the notice of
management and receive immediate action of management on priority basis.
- Saves time and efforts of managers as they deal only with significant deviations.
- Facilitates delegation of authority and increase morale of employees as route problems are left to the subordinates.
- Identifies critical problems, which need timely action to keep the organization in the right track.
Once the deviations are identifies, they need to be analyzed for their causes. They may have multiple causes like:
- unrealistic standards
- defective process
- inadequacy of resources
- structural drawbacks
When they go beyond this range, especially in key areas – immediate managerial attention is required. In case, the deviation cannot be
corrected through managerial action, the standards may have to be revised.