1 - Introduction To AB Materials
1 - Introduction To AB Materials
PROPERTIES
OF AB
MATERIALS
FIRST SEMESTER, A.Y. 2024-2025
Figure excerpt from: The Science and Engineering Materials, 3rd Edition
Table excerpt from: The Science and Engineering Materials, 3rd Edition
Engineering materials
Steel 7800
Concrete 2300
Rubber 1100
Biological materials
Bone 2000
Cartilage 1100
Tendon 1300
Locust cuticle 1200
Comparison: density of water is 1000 kg/m3
ROUND 1
Environmental Perspective:
Pro: Agricultural and biological materials can reduce the environmental
footprint by promoting biodegradability, reducing waste, and encouraging
recycling. For instance, using bioplastics derived from agricultural products
can decrease reliance on petroleum-based plastics.
Con: The production and disposal of some agricultural and biological
materials may still pose environmental challenges, such as land use
changes, water consumption, and pesticide use, which can lead to habitat
destruction and pollution.
ABE 3122 – PROPERTIES OF AB MATERIALS PREPARED BY: JANE FAITH F. FALCESO
Debate topic:
ROUND 1
Economic Perspective:
Pro: Investing in agricultural and biological materials can drive economic growth
by creating new markets, generating jobs, and reducing dependence on imported
raw materials. Innovations in this sector can lead to cost-effective solutions for
both producers and consumers.
Con: The initial costs of developing and scaling up the production of agricultural
and biological materials can be high, potentially making these materials less
economically viable in the short term compared to traditional materials. There
may also be economic risks associated with fluctuating agricultural yields.
ABE 3122 – PROPERTIES OF AB MATERIALS PREPARED BY: JANE FAITH F. FALCESO
Debate topic:
ROUND 1
Social Perspective:
Pro: Agricultural and biological materials can enhance social well-being by
providing safer, non-toxic alternatives for everyday products, improving food
security through sustainable farming practices, and supporting rural economies.
Con: The shift towards agricultural and biological materials might lead to
unintended social consequences, such as land competition between food and
non-food crops, which could impact food prices and availability, and potentially
displace small-scale farmers.
ROUND 2
Social vs Environmental
Social focuses on community benefits and safety
Environmental highlights potential environmental damage
affecting communities.
ROUND 2
Environmental vs Economic
Environmental emphasizes sustainability and reduced
waste.
Economic points out economic feasibility and cost
challenges.
ROUND 2
Economic vs Social
Economic discusses job creation and market growth.
Social raises concerns about social inequalities and food
security.