J of Cosmetic Dermatology - 2024 - Huang - Efficacy and Tolerability of A Novel Cosmetic and Over The Counter Facial Acne
J of Cosmetic Dermatology - 2024 - Huang - Efficacy and Tolerability of A Novel Cosmetic and Over The Counter Facial Acne
J of Cosmetic Dermatology - 2024 - Huang - Efficacy and Tolerability of A Novel Cosmetic and Over The Counter Facial Acne
1 Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company, Irvine, California, USA | 2SGS Stephens Inc., Richardson, Texas, USA
Funding: Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company, funded this study and participated in the study design, research, analysis, data collection, interpreta-
tion of data, reviewing, and approval of the publication. All authors had access to relevant data and participated in the drafting, review, and approval of this
publication. No honoraria or payments were made for authorship. Medical writing support was provided by Illyce Nuñez, PhD of Peloton Advantage, LLC,
an OPEN Health company, and funded by Allergan Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company.
ABSTRACT
Background: The SkinMedica Acne Treatment Platform (SM Regimen) was formulated to treat acne without overdrying the
skin. We evaluated efficacy and tolerability of the SM Regimen (including a novel 1% salicylic acid Acne Clarifying Cleanser
and 2% salicylic acid Acne Treatment Lotion) versus a prescription formulation (Rx Regimen; including adapalene 0.1%/benzoyl
peroxide 2.5%) in a diverse population of adults with mild to moderate facial acne.
Methods: This single-center, double-blind, randomized study enrolled adults (18–45 years) with Fitzpatrick skin types (FST)
I–VI. SM Regimen or Rx Regimen was applied topically to the entire face for 12 weeks. Assessments were conducted at 24 and
48 h and 4, 8, and 12 weeks.
Results: Subjects (SM Regimen, n = 31; Rx Regimen, n = 23) were primarily female (90.7%) with mean age of 28.6 years; 53.8%
had FST IV–VI. Efficacy was comparable between regimens. The SM regimen resulted in significant improvements versus base-
line in mean Investigator's Global Assessment of acne severity from 48 h through week 12 (p ≤ 0.001), as well as significant and
sustained improvements from baseline in total acne lesion count, global postinflammatory hyperpigmentation/postinflamma-
tory erythema, and oiliness. The SM Regimen was well tolerated at all time points, with mean scores below mild for all parame-
ters; the Rx Regimen caused significantly more tightness/dry feeling at week 4 versus SM Regimen (p = 0.008). Subjects (> 96%)
reported high satisfaction with the SM Regimen at all time points.
Conclusions: The SM Regimen reduced acne severity and skin oiliness, evening out skin tone without overdrying or irritating
the skin.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Investigator-assessed counts of total acne lesions, inflammatory Investigator-assessed clinical grading of tactile oiliness was per-
lesions (papules, pustules), and noninflammatory lesions (open formed at each visit using the following scale: 0 (no oily feel); 1–3
and closed comedones) on the face were recorded at each visit. (mild oily feel); 4–6 (moderate oily feel); and 7–9 (strong oily feel).
Lesion counts were assessed separately for the forehead, left and
right cheeks (including the side of nose), and chin (including the
area above the upper lip). 2.2.6 | Subject Self-Assessment
3 of 10
14732165, 0, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.16568 by Yemen Hinari NPL, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
FIGURE 1 | Change from baseline in mean IGA acne severity assessment over time. No statistical significance was observed between treatment
groups. IGA, Investigator's Global Assessment. *p ≤ 0.004 versus baseline.
FIGURE 2 | Percent change from baseline in mean total acne lesion count over time. *p < 0.001 versus baseline. †p = 0.021 versus Rx Regimen.
2.2.8 | Tolerability Assessments baseline were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank test. Statistical
tests were 2-sided (α = 0.05) and performed using SAS software
Tolerability evaluations were performed at each visit. version 9.4 (SAS Statistical Institute).
Investigator-assessed erythema and dryness/scaling were as-
sessed on a 10-point scale (0 = none, 1–3 = mild, 4–6 = moderate,
7–9 = severe) and edema on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 3 | Results
2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Subject assessments of burning,
itching, and tightness/dry feeling were reported on a 4-point 3.1 | Subjects
scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe).
A total of 63 subjects were enrolled and 54 subjects were
included in the ITT population (SM Regimen, n = 31; Rx
2.3 | Statistical Methods Regimen, n = 23; Table 1). Most subjects were female (90.7%),
and there was a balanced proportion of subjects with FST IV–
Target enrollment was based on the number of patients typically VI (> 50% in both groups). In the SM Regimen versus the Rx
enrolled in past studies investigating topical skincare products. Regimen group, respectively, there were numerically lower
Analyses were conducted in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, proportions of White subjects (32.3% vs. 47.8%) and Black or
which included all treated subjects with at least 1 post-baseline African American subjects (41.9% vs. 47.8%) and a higher pro-
evaluation. Between- group comparisons and change from portion of Asian subjects (25.8% vs. 4.3%). A total of 14 subjects
Week 12
−46.4%*
−68.3%*
n = 5) due to subject-
requested withdrawal (SM Regimen,
−47.2%*
−55.1%*
—
—
—
n = 3; Rx Regimen, n = 2), lost to follow-up (SM Regimen,
n = 5; Rx Regimen, n = 2), did not meet protocol criteria (SM
Regimen, n = 1; Rx Regimen, n = 0), and noncompliance (SM
Regimen, n = 0; Rx Regimen, n = 1).
−62.8%*
−41.2%*
−31.4%*
−37.6%*
Week 8
—
—
—
3.2 | Efficacy
Rx Regimen
−26.8%*
−20.8%†
Week 4
—
—
—
For both treatment groups, significant improvements versus
baseline were observed in mean global acne severity scores at
Note: Indicates statistically significant improvement versus baseline: *p < 0.001; †p < 0.005; ‡p < 0.05. Indicates statistically significant improvement versus the other group: §p < 0.05.
each follow-up visit from 48 h through 12 weeks (p ≤ 0.004;
Figure 1). No statistically significant differences in mean scores
−40.4%*
−32.7%*
−15.3%‡
−28.6%†
−31.1%*
48 h
−1.7%
24 h
—
—
−56.2%*
−57.9%*
—
—
−37.9%†
—
—
−25.2%*
−25.2%*
Week 4
−21.6%
(p < 0.001).
—
—
—
−37.3%*
−18.3%†
−15.3%
48 h
−20.7%*
−16.9%*
−3.0%
−2.7%
24 h
SM Regimen (p = 0.036).
—
—
Size/Diameter
Inflammatory
3.2.4 | PIH/PIE Assessments
Elevation
Darkness
Redness
baseline
5 of 10
14732165, 0, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.16568 by Yemen Hinari NPL, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
FIGURE 3 | Percentage change from baseline in mean assessment of global PIH/PIE. No statistical significance was observed between treatment
groups. PIH/PIE, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation/postinflammatory erythema. *p ≤ 0.004 versus baseline.
FIGURE 4 | Percentage change from baseline in investigator grading of mean tactile oiliness (forehead) over time. No statistical significance was
observed between treatment groups. *p ≤ 0.004 versus baseline; †p = 0.047 versus baseline.
4 weeks, with significant improvements observed up to 12 weeks 48 h only (p = 0.047; Figure 4). There was no statistically signifi-
(p ≤ 0.004) (Figure 3). The size and darkness of the target PIH/ cant difference in tactile oiliness between groups.
PIE lesions were significantly improved versus baseline at 4, 8,
and 12 weeks with both regimens (p ≤ 0.002; Table 2). No statis-
tically significant differences were observed between groups in 3.3 | Subject Self-Assessment Questionnaire
global or target PIH/PIE lesion scores.
Subjects consistently rated the SM Regimen highly across sev-
eral parameters at 24 and 48 h and at 12 weeks. The highest-
3.2.5 | Tactile Oiliness rated parameters included statements about not drying out the
skin (≥ 95% of subjects agreed at 24 h), made my skin look and
The SM Regimen significantly reduced tactile oiliness at all feel less oily (93% at 4 weeks), and made my skin look clearer
timepoints compared with baseline (p ≤ 0.004), whereas the Rx (90% and 93% of subjects agreed at 48 h and 4 weeks, respec-
Regimen showed significant improvements versus baseline at tively). Subjects reported favorable treatment satisfaction at all
4 | Discussion
7 of 10
14732165, 0, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.16568 by Yemen Hinari NPL, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
FIGURE 6 | Change from baseline in mean tolerability assessments of tightness and dry feeling over time. No statistical significance compared
with baseline at any time point. *Statistically significantly worse versus SM Regimen (p = 0.008).
The SM Regimen demonstrated significant improvements from treatment and was evaluated in a diverse population of subjects,
baseline in global assessments of PIH and PIE as early as 48 h, and the study met target enrollment for subjects with PIH/PIE and
which were sustained up to 12 weeks. PIH and PIE occur when with darker skin types. Limitations include that this was a single-
acne inflammation results in overproduction of melanin or capil- center study and the lack of an adolescent cohort. It is possible that
lary damage, respectively [23]. Although PIE is more common in observed benefits of the SM Regimen could extend to adolescents
lighter skin (FST I–III), PIH can occur with any skin type but may because the etiology of acne may be similar in adults and adoles-
be more prevalent and prominent in darker skin [10, 24]. Skin irri- cents. Additional research is warranted in larger, multi-site studies
tation associated with acne treatment may worsen PIH in patients to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of the SM Regimen in
with skin of color or contribute to erythema [23]. The current find- adolescents with acne. Also, the small sample size could be a po-
ings suggest that the SM Regimen, which can be used alone or in tential study limitation; however, the number of patients enrolled
combination with a spot treatment [25], may help address the need in this study aligns with other studies investigating safety and effi-
for gentle and effective acne treatments that reduce PIH and PIE. cacy of topical acne products [12].
Most subjects (> 96%) reported high treatment satisfaction and In this randomized study of adults with acne, the SM Regimen
favorable tolerability with the SM Regimen, including in pa- effectively reduced acne severity and skin oiliness while evening
rameters associated with skin dryness. Current acne treatment out skin tone without overdrying or irritating the skin. Most
formulations can have adverse events, such as dryness and skin subjects (> 96%) reported high satisfaction with the SM Regimen
irritation, that limit tolerability and treatment adherence [11]. at all time points, suggesting it may help address the need for an
In addition, adults often have additional needs related to skin effective acne treatment that respects the needs of adult skin.
aging, such as reduced barrier function, impaired hydration, and
changes in skin quality (e.g., larger pores; wrinkles; dull, blotchy,
and rough skin; hyperpigmentation; erythema; and dryness) [26]. Author Contributions
Study design: Priscilla Huang, Elizabeth T. Makino, and Rahul C.
The SM Regimen takes a multifactorial approach to acne con- Mehta. Principal investigator: Elizabeth T. Makino. Study investigator:
trol, considering the needs of adult skin. Specifically, ingredi- Cecilia L. Pak. Enrolled patients: Cecilia L. Pak. Collection and assem-
ents in the SM Regimen, including bakuchiol, niacinamide, bly of data: Cecilia L. Pak. Data analysis: Cecilia L. Pak. Data interpre-
and a synergistic complex of chaulmoogra, black cumin, ma- tation: All authors. Manuscript review and revisions: All authors. Final
nuka, and magnolia, help address acne without drying the skin approval of manuscript: All authors.
and work to restore and maintain a good balance of sebum.
Overabundance of sebum can promote acne- related inflam- Acknowledgments
mation, as oxidation of lipids in sebum triggers the release of Medical writing support was provided by Illyce Nuñez, PhD of Peloton
inflammatory mediators in the skin [27]. An imbalance of ox- Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company, and funded by Allergan
idants and antioxidants in acne-prone skin contributes to this Aesthetics, an AbbVie Company. All authors met the ICMJE authorship
process [27]. Ingredients with antioxidant properties, such as criteria. Neither honoraria nor other forms of payment were made for
bakuchiol and niacinamide, were included in the SM Regimen authorship.
with the aim of restoring this balance, preventing sebum oxida-
tion, and reducing inflammation. Ethics Statement
The authors confirm that the ethical policies of the journal, as noted
Strengths of this study include that the SM Regimen was com- on the journal's author guidelines page, have been adhered to and the
pared with the gold standard prescription combination topical appropriate ethical review committee approval has been received. The
9 of 10
14732165, 0, Downloaded from https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jocd.16568 by Yemen Hinari NPL, Wiley Online Library on [20/11/2024]. See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed by the applicable Creative Commons License
Pigment-Correcting Dark Spot Treatment for Post-Inflammatory Hy-
perpigmentation and Solar Lentigines,” Clinical, Cosmetic and Investi-
gational Dermatology 16 (2023): 2677–2686.
26. S. Humphrey, S. Manson Brown, S. J. Cross, and R. Mehta, “Defin-
ing Skin Quality: Clinical Relevance, Terminology, and Assessment,”
Dermatologic Surgery 47 (2021): 974–981.
27. G. L. Popa, C. I. Mitran, M. I. Mitran, et al., “Markers of Oxidative
Stress in Patients With Acne: A Literature Review,” Life 13 (2023): 1433.