0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views1 page

Illustrative Mathematics

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 1

Engage your students with effective

distance learning resources. ACCESS

Proportionality
RESOURCES>>

No Tags

Alignments to Content Standards: 7.RP.A.2.c

Student View

Task

A text book has the following definition for two


quantities to be directly proportional:

We say that

y is directly proportional to
x if
y = kx for some constant
k.

For homework, students were asked to restate the


definition in their own words and to give an example
for the concept. Below are some of their answers.
Discuss each statement and example. Translate the
statements and examples into equations to help you
decide if they are correct.

Marcus:

This means that both quantities are the same. When


one increases the other increases by the same
amount. An example of this would be the amount of
air in a balloon and the volume of a balloon.

Sadie:

Two quantities are proportional if one change is


accompanied by a change in the other. For example
the radius of a circle is proportional to the area.

Ben:

When two quantities are directly proportional it


means that if one quantity goes up by a certain
percentage, the other quantity goes up by the same
percentage as well. An example could be as gas
prices go up in cost, food prices go up in cost.

Jessica:

When two quantities are proportional, it means that


as one quantity increases the other will also increase
and the ratio of the quantities is the same for all
values. An example could be the circumference of a
circle and its diameter, the ratio of the values would
equal π.

IM Commentary

The task has two main purposes. (1) Students make


sense out of the definition of direct proportionality.
(2) They engage in SMP 3 "Make a viable argument
and critique the reasoning of others" and SMP 6
"Attend to precision".

Being asked to read other people's explanations of a


definition forces the students to engage with the
definition at a deeper level. To help students decide if
an explanation is correct, teachers could encourage
them to translate the words into equations and to try
to "break" the rewordings. This leads naturally into
attending to precision of language. Many of the given
explanations are partially correct but not precise
enough. The explanation "Two quantities are
proportional if one change is accompanied by a
change in the other." is true but incomplete. The
explanation "When two quantities are directly
proportional it means that if one quantity goes up by
a certain percentage, the other quantity goes up by
the same percentage as well." is actually correct, but
not obvious.

Students also have to decide if a given example


illustrates the definition. Do do this, students should
again be encouraged to translate the words into
equations.

Solution

Marcus

The two quantities do not have to be the same to be


proportional. If we say they are the same, this means
that
y = x , which is only one example of proportionality,
but there are infinitely many more. The second
sentence is also incorrect, if
x increases by some amount,
y does not have to increase by the same amount. For
example, if
y = 2x , then if
x increases by 1,
y will increase by 2.

The example is not informative. The amount of air in


a balloon is usually measured by its volume.

Sadie

Sadie's definition is not precise enough. Just saying


that change in one quantity results in change in the
other is to general and true for many relationships
that are not proportional. The radius is directly
proportional to the square root of the area of the
circle,
r = 1π √A, not
r = kA as Sadie says.

Ben

Ben's definition actually works: If


x increases by 10%, then for
y = kx we have

y = k(1.1x) = 1.1(kx),

and we see that


y also increases by 10%. This also works if
x changes by a factor of
r then
y = k(rx) = r(kx), so
y also changes by the same factor. The example is
not stated precisely enough. It might be that gas
prices and food cost are proportional to each other
in certain situations, but that is not a general law or
principle.

Jessica

Jessica's definition works. She says that


k = y/x, which is equivalent to
y = kx . Her example also works:
C = πr.

Typeset May 4,
2016 at 18:58:52.
Licensed by
Illustrative
Mathematics
under a
Creative
Commons
Attribution-
NonCommercial-
ShareAlike 4.0
International
License.

You might also like