Col A K Pathak GTO Report November
Col A K Pathak GTO Report November
Col A K Pathak GTO Report November
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.50
Candidate No.50 lacks knowledge of current affairs, remains stressed, and has
very limited communication skills. She was non participative in the group
discussions, and hardly spoke, even when given a chance by her group
members. In the Group Planning Exercise her participation was once again very
unsatisfactory. The written solutions lacked grasp of the situations, and thus the
solutions were incomplete. In the Lecturrete, she chose below average level
topics, but on account of inadequate knowledge, wasn't able to do justice to
them.
In the Outdoor Tasks, she did not contribute at all, and apparently displayed lack
of ideas, to arrive at workable plans.
In the Individual Obstacles (IOs) her performance was good. Displaying good
physical fitness and coordinated approach , she could attempt all the IOs within
the allotted time.
Candidate No.50 needs to put in lots of efforts in the GTO tasks, to be able to
make the grade
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.51
In the Outdoor Tasks, she did not contribute at all, and apparently displayed lack
of ideas , to arrive at workable plans.
In the Individual Obstacles (IOs) was found wanting, and apart from being
disoriented , she displayed inability to even take calculated risks.
Candidate No.51 needs to put in immense efforts in all the GTO tasks , to be
able to make the grade
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.54
In Outdoor Tasks, she was hardly participative, hence her contribution to the
group effort was minimal. In the Individal Obstacles (IOs),she displayed lack of
physical fitness, was stressful and scared, thus could complete only 50% of the
IOs in the allotted time.
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.53
Candidate No.53 lacks basic knowledge of current affairs, is very stressful, and
has very limited communication skills. She hardly participated in the group
discussions, even when given a chance by her group members. In the Group
Planning Exercise she continued to remain quiet, thus not contributing towards
the group solution. The written solutions indicated limited grasp of the
situations, with the time and space aspect not being catered at all, thus the
solutions were incomplete and non-workable. In the Lecturrete, she chose
below average level topics, but on account of inadequate knowledge, and
limited communication skills could barely speak for a minute and a half.
In the Outdoor Tasks, she did not contribute at all, and apparently displayed lack
of ideas, to arrive at workable plans.
In the Individual Obstacles (IOs) was found wanting, and apart from being
disoriented, she lacked desired physical fitness, this could only complete 60 % of
tasks, in the allotted time.
Candidate No.53 needs to put in immense efforts in all the GTO tasks, to be able
to give herself a chance to get recommended.
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.55
In the Outdoor Tasks, she was hardly participative, hence her contribution to the
group effort was minimal. In the Individal Obstacles (IOs), she displayed lack of
physical fitness, was stressful and scared, thus could complete only 40% of the
IOs in the allotted time.
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.60
She did not participate in the Outdoor Tasks on both days, thus couldn't be
assessed for the same
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.57
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.58
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.61
In the Outdoor Tasks, he was hardly participative, hence his contribution to the
group effort was minimal. In the Individual Obstacles (IOs), he displayed just
satisfactory physical fitness, was stressful and appeared scared while attempting
a few obstacles. He could barely complete all the tasks in the allotted time.
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.68
In Outdoor Tasks, he participated actively, however, wasn't able to spell out any
workable ideas, apart from a few familiar ones. Hence, his contribution to the
group effort was minimal. In the Individual Obstacles (IOs),he displayed good
physical attributes, was oriented/organised in attempting the obstacles, thus
could even repeat two obstacles, within the allotted time.
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.65
In the Outdoor Tasks, his participation was limited, and he remained subdued,
thus could hardly contribute to the group effort. In the Individual Obstacles
(IOs),he displayed good physical attributes, was organised/oriented ,thus could
even repeat a few obstacles, within the allotted time.
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
CANDIDATE NO.59
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
GYANENDRA KUMAR (CHEST NO.62)
In the Outdoor Tasks, he was hardly participative, thus wasn't able to contribute
to the achievement of group's goal/aim. not cont. In the Individal Obstacles
(IOs), he displayed limited physical attributes, was stressed and somewhat
disoriented in attempting the obstacles. He could barely complete the obstacles
in the allotted time
Col A K Pathak
GTO
REPORTS WARRIORS’ DEFENCE ACADEMY
GTO- REPORT
PRIYANSH VERMA (CHEST NO.63)
In the Outdoor Tasks, he was seen to be keen, but displayed a very limited
participation, thus contributed minimally, to the group effort. In the Individal
Obstacles (IOs), he displayed adequate physical attributes, was oriented in
attempting the obstacles, and could negotiate all of them, in the allotted time.
Col A K Pathak
GTO