Smpcbook, VR
Smpcbook, VR
Smpcbook, VR
on
Switched Mode Power Conversion
V. Ramanarayanan
December 2, 2007
c V. Ramanarayanan 2005
First Edition 2005
Second Edition 2006
i
Preface
Power electronics forms an important part of industrial electronics. Power
electronics is defined as the application of electronic devices and associated
components to the efficient conversion, control and conditioning of electric
power. The modern power electronics technology traces its origin to the tech-
nology of rectifiers developed using mercury arc devices. From this beginning
of simple ac-dc conversion of power, today the technology has grown to en-
compass the general definition given above. The conversion of power relates
to the form of electric power namely ac or dc. The control application relates
to the regulation of electrical quantities like voltage, current, power etc. or
the regulation of non-electrical quantities such as the speed of a motor, the
temperature in an oven, the intensity of lighting etc. The conditioning of
electrical power relates to the quality of power quantified through harmonic
content, reactive power in a system and so on.
The key aspect of power electronics is the efficiency of power processing. As
bulk power is processed in power electronic systems, high efficiency of power
conversion is vital for reasons of both the economic value of lost power as well
as the detrimental effect of the heat that the lost power results in a power
electronic system.
Traditionally the subject of power electronics is introduced in an undergrad-
uate curriculam more as “Thyristor and its applications” than as the subject
of power electronics proper [1]. The reason for this bias is understandable.
Historically the first commercial solid state power switching device available
was the silicon controlled rectifier (SCR). Initially the SCRs started replac-
ing the ignitron tubes for ac-dc conversion and Ward-Leonard systems for the
speed control of dc motors. With the availability of fast SCRs, the applica-
tion of SCRs entered the area of dc-ac power conversion as well. The subject
of power electronics practically grew with the application of SCRs. The un-
dergraduate curriculum therefore centered around the SCR and broadly dealt
with naturally commutated converters for ac-dc power conversion, and forced
commutated converters for the dc-ac power converters [8]. The application
area was broadly classified into natural commutated applications and forced
commutated applications. This classification itself grew out of the limitation
of the SCR that it cannot be turned off through the control gate. The focus of
such a curriculum was on the SCR in the centre and its myriad applications
based on the above classification.
However the monopoly of SCR as the power electronic switch was eroded
from the mid 1970s. The newer devices arriving in the commercial scene
were bipolar junction transistor (BJT), metal oxide semiconductor field effect
transistor (MOSFET), and the insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT). These
devices are fully controllable (both off/on transition and on/off transition),
faster in switching, and easier to control compared to the SCR. These modern
devices are getting closer and closer to the ideal properties of a switch. The
ii
V. Ramanarayanan
[email protected]
Department of Electrial Engineering
Indian Institute of Science
560012
Contents
4 DC-TO-DC Converter 95
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95
4.2 Simple DC to DC Converter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
4.2.1 Series Controlled Regulator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
4.2.2 Shunt Controlled Converter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97
4.2.3 Practical Regulators . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
4.3 Switched Mode Power Converters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
4.3.1 Primitive dc-to-dc Converter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100
4.3.2 A Simplified Analysis Of The Primitive Converter . . . 104
4.3.3 Nonidealities in the Primitive Converters: . . . . . . . 106
4.4 More Versatile Power Converters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 107
4.4.1 Buck Converter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108
4.4.2 Boost Converter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 110
4.4.3 Buck-Boost Converter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 112
4.5 Discontinuous Mode of Operation in dc to dc Converters . . . 115
4.5.1 Buck converter in DCM Operation . . . . . . . . . . . 117
4.6 Isolated dc to dc Converters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122
4.6.1 Forward Converter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 123
4.6.2 Push-Pull converter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
4.6.3 Half and Full Bridge Converter . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
4.6.4 Fly-back Converter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
4.7 Problem Set . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
I Theses 371
I.1 Industrial Drives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
I.2 Power Quality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 371
I.3 Switched Mode Power Conversion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 372
I.4 Electromagnetics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 373
J Publications 375
J.1 Journals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 375
J.2 Conferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 377
1.1 Introduction
In Power Electronic Systems (PES), the most important feature is the effi-
ciency. Therefore as a rule PES do not use resistance as power circuit ele-
ments. The function of dropping voltages and passing currents is therefore
R VO IO
VG Load IG R Load
achieved by means of switches. The ideal switch drops no voltage (zero resis-
tance) while ON and passes no current (zero conductance) while OFF. When
a switch is operated alternately between the two (ON and OFF) states, it may
be considered to offer an effective resistance depending on the switching duty
ratio. Effectively the switch functions as a loss-less resistance. In the circuit
shown in Fig. 1, the resistor drops excess voltage (VG − VO ) or diverts excess
current (IG − IO ). These functions are achieved at the cost of power loss in the
resistor. The same function may be achieved by means of switches as shown
in Fig. 2. It may be seen that the switch effectively drops certain voltage or
diverts certain current from reaching the load (VO ≤ VG and IO ≤ IG ). How-
ever, the load voltage and current are not smooth on account of the switching
process in the control. In general PES will consist of switches for the control
2 Power Switching Devices - Characteristics
Ton VO Toff
Toff Ton IO
VG Load IG Load
of power flow and reactive elements (filters) to divert the effects of switching
from reaching the load. The power circuit elements in PES are therefore
1. Switches — (to control transfer of energy)
2. Reactors — (Inductors and Capacitors) — (to smoothen the transfer of
energy)
Ioff = 0 Ion
Voff Von = 0
1. In the OFF state, the current passing through the switch is zero and the
switch is capable of supporting any voltage across it.
Iof f = 0; −∞ ≤ Vof f ≤ +∞;
2. In the ON state, the voltage across the switch is zero and the switch is
capable of passing any current through it.
1.3 Real Switches 3
ON State
along I axis
V
OFF State
along V axis
3. Switching from one state to the other takes a finite time. Consequently
the maximum operating frequency of the switch is limited.
ton 6= 0; tof f 6= 0;
The consequence of finite switching time is the associated switch-
ing losses.
4. The switch transitions require external energy and so also the switch
states.
Eon 6= 0; Eon/of f 6= 0;
Eof f 6= 0; Eof f /on 6= 0;
Real switches need supporting circuits (drive circuits) to pro-
vide this energy.
5. The switch characteristics are thermally limited. The power dissipation in
the device is nonzero. It appears as heat and raises the temperature of the
device. To prevent unlimited rise in temperature of the device external
aids are needed to carry away the generated heat from the device.
Real switches suffer from a number of failure modes associated
with the OFF state voltage and ON state current limits.
I
Current Limit Voltage Limits
V
Power Limit
The operating points of real switches on the VI plane are shown in Fig. 5.
The steady state operating points lie close to the axis within certain limits.
Further there is a safe operating area (SOA) on the VI plane for transient
operation.
A Uncontrolled switches
B Semi-controlled switches
C Controlled switches
Both the states of the switch (ON/OFF) are reachable through appro-
priate control signals applied to the control terminal of the device.
Bipolar junction transistor (BJT), field effect transistor (FET), gate
turn-off thyristor (GTO), insulated gate bipolar transistor (IGBT)
fall under this group of switches.
The switches desired in PES are realized through a combination of the above
devices.
A Imax
ON State
K I>0
VRmax VAK
OFF State
VAK < 0
1.5 Diodes
The diode is a two terminal device - with anode (A) and cathode (K). The v-i
characteristic of the diode is shown in Fig. 6.
1. When the diode is forward biased (VAK > 0), the diode approximates to
an ON switch.
Von = Vf ≈ 0; Ion is decided by the external circuit.
ON State
VG /R
−VG VAK
OFF State VG R
2. When the diode is reverse biased (VAK < 0), the diode approximates to
an OFF switch.
Iof f = Irev ≈ 0; Vof f is decided by the external circuit.
For a typical application, the forward and reverse biased operating points
are shown in Fig. 7.
3. In the ON and OFF condition, the diode dissipates certain finite power.
Pon = Vf Ion ; (Conduction loss)
Pof f = Vof f Irev ; (Blocking loss)
4. The diode does not have explicit control inputs. It reaches the ON state
with a small delay (tr ) when the device is forward biased. It blocks to
the OFF state after a small delay (trr ) when the forward current goes to
zero.
tr = forward recovery time
trr = reverse recovery time
The forward recovery time is much less than the reverse recovery time.
1.5 Diodes 7
During the reverse recovery time a negative current flows through the
device to supply the reverse charge required to block reverse voltage across
the junction. The process is shown in Fig. 8. The reverse recovery time
decides the maximum frequency at which the diode may be switched.
I
t rr
t
These have low ON state voltage (Vf ≈ 0.4V ) with reverse blocking capacity of
less than 100V. These are suitable for circuits where low conduction loss is de-
sired. Sample data sheet of a schottky diode (Schottky Diode MBRP30060CT
Motorola) is given in Appendix F.
These are suitable as rectifier diodes in line frequency (50/60 Hz) applications.
Recovery times are not specified. These are available for current/voltage rat-
ings of a few thousands of amps/volts. Sample data sheet of a rectifier diode
(Rectifier Diode 20ETS Series International Rectifier) is given in Appendix F.
These diodes have very low recovery times and are suitable for high frequency
switching applications. The recovery details are fully specified for these diodes.
Typical recovery times are a few tens of nanoseconds. Sample data sheet of a
fast rectifier diode (Fast Diode RHRG30120CC Harris) is given in Appendix
F.
I
A
ON State
G K I>0
Forward OFF
VRmax VAK
J1 J2 J3
OFF State P N P N
VAK < 0 A K
G
A A
P1
P1
N1
N1 N1
G P2
P2 P2
G
N2
N2
K K
A I
G Latching Current
IG1 IG3
VAK
11. Once the anode current reaches the level of latching current following
triggering, the device remains ON.
IG
Commutation di/dt
IT
Turn−on di/dt
t
td IRM
OFF State dv/dt tq
tr VR
VRRM
If during turn-on, the anode current builds up too fast, the device may get
damaged. The initial turn-on of the device occurs near the gate cathode
periphery and then the turn-on area of the device spreads across the entire
junction with a finite velocity. If IT rises at a rate faster than the spreading
velocity, then the entire current IT is confined to a small area of the device
eventually causing overheating of the junction and destruction of the device.
Therefore it is necessary to limit the turn-on di/dt of the circuit to less than
the safe di/dt that can be tolerated by the device.
• During conduction, the middle junction is heavily saturated with minority
carriers and the gate has no further control on the device. The device
drop under this condition is typically about 1V.
• From the conducting state, the SCR can be turned OFF by temporarily
applying a negative voltage across the device from the external circuit.
When reverse voltage is applied, the forward current first goes to zero and
then the current builds up in the reverse direction with the commutation
di/dt. The commutation di/dt depends on the external commutating cir-
cuit. The reverse current flows across the device to sweep the minority
carriers across the junction. At maximum reverse recovery current IRM ,
the junction begins to block causing decay of reverse current. The fast
decay of the recovery current causes a voltage overshoot VRRM across the
device on account of the parasitic inductance in the circuit. At zero cur-
rent, the middle junction is still forward biased and the minority carriers
in the vicinity must be given time for recombination. The device requires
a minimum turn-off time tq before forward blocking voltage may be ap-
plied to the device. The reapplied dV/dt has to be limited so that no
spurious turn-on occurs. The device turn-off time “tq ” is a function of
Tj , IT , VR , VDRM , dV /dt, di/dt and VG .
Thyristors are available for PES applications with voltage ratings upto about
3000V and current ratings upto about 2000A.
1. When blocking forward or reverse voltages a small leakage current flows.
2. When conducting forward current a low voltage is dropped.
3. There are finite power losses in conduction and blocking.
4. The turn ON and turn OFF processes are not instantaneous.
5. The device losses warrant proper thermal design.
6. Turn-ON requires energy through gate circuit. Usually this is quite small.
7. Turn-OFF requires energy supplied through an external commutation cir-
cuit. This energy usually is much larger than the turn-on energy supplied
through the gate.
1.6 Thyristor or Silicon Controlled Rectifier (SCR) 13
• OFF state and reapplied dV/dt limit (to help in commutating circuit
design)
ic
C Saturation Region
B
Active Region
E
Cut−off Region
Vce
B C
ib ic
β ib
E
1. The device passes a small leakage current while OFF. The OFF state
voltage is limited.
Iof f = Iceo 6= 0; −Vbe ≤ Vof f ≤ Vceo ;
2. There is a small voltage drop across the device while ON. The ON state
current is limited.
Von = Vce(sat) 6= 0; 0 ≤ Ion ≤ Icmax ;
The device dissipation is (respectively the conduction and blocking loss)
Pon = Vce(sat) Ion ; Pof f = Vof f Iceo ;
4. The switches take a finite time to switch ON and OFF after the base
drive is established
ton = td + tr ; td = delay time; tr = rise time;
tof f = ts + tf ; ts = storage time; tf = fall time;
5. The conduction, blocking and switching losses raise the junction temper-
ature of the device. To limit the operating junction temperature of the
device, proper thermal design has to be made.
ib
ib1
t
ib2
ic
1
t
td ts
Vce
2
t
tr tf
Turn On
Turn Off
To turn-off the transistor, the forward base drive is removed and a negative
base drive is set up.
• The junctions (base-emitter and base-collector) remain forward biased for
a duration “ts ”. During this storage time, ic continues to flow and the
device voltage vce drop remains low. This is the time taken to remove
the accumulated charge in the junction, so that the junction may start
blocking. The storage time increases with ib1 and decreases with ib2 .
• After the storage time, in a time “tf ”, the collector current falls (almost)
linearly to zero. During the fall time (hatched region 2), the collector-
emitter voltage vce(t) is decided by the external circuit.
It may be seen from the switching process that the device losses are low during
the transient intervals td and ts . The switching losses occur during tr and tf .
The collector current during tr and the device voltage during tf are dictated
by the external circuit. This feature is used to reduce the switching losses in
any application. The important specifications of the transistor are
• Peak and average current (to assess suitability with a power circuit)
• Peak blocking voltage Vceo (to assess suitability with a power circuit)
• ON state voltage Vce (sat) (to assess conduction loss)
• OFF state current Iceo (to assess blocking loss)
• Thermal impedance (to help thermal design)
• Switching times td , ts , tr and tf (to design drive circuits Ib1 , Ib2 and to
select the switching frequency)
• Forced beta (to design drive circuit)
• Safe operating area SOA (to design switching protection)
The links to data sheets of a standard BJT BUX48 and a darlington transistor
MJ10015 are given in Appendix F.
ID
Forward ON
Cut−off
VDS
Reverse ON D
G
Vgs
Vth
ic
1
td
t d(off)
Vce
2
t
tr tf
on through the gate. The two-transistor model of the GTO is shown in Fig.
17. The operating principle of a GTO, similar to the SCR is based on the
regeneratively coupled switching transistor pair. The GTO on account of its
construction, unlike an SCR, behaves like a large number of small Thyristors on
a common substrate, with common anodes and gates, but individual cathodes.
The turn-on mechanism of the GTO is identical to that of the SCR. However,
in the case of the GTO, it is possible to turn-off the device by passing a reverse
gate current. The ratio of anode current that can be turned-off to the reverse
gate current necessary to carry out successfully the turn-off process is called
the turn-off gain. The switching cycle of a GTO consists of four different
phases. These are namely,
A A A
P P
N N N
G G
P P P
N N G
K K K
• Turn-on
• Conduction
• Turn-off
• Blocking
1.9.1 Turn-on
The turn-on process of a GTO is initiated by triggering a current through
the gate-cathode circuit. In the case of a Thyristor, a small gate current is
adequate to initiate the regenerative switching on process. The conduction
then spreads to a large silicon area. The on-state currents may be several
thousands of amperes. The on state rate-of-rise-of-current, however, has to be
limited to a few hundred amperes per microsecond. GTOs, on the contrary
require a much larger current to initiate the regenerative turn-on process.
On account of the segmented construction of the cathode, all the individual
thyristors turn-on simultaneously. The anode current may rise at the rate of
a few thousand amperes per microsecond. Turn-on gate current may vary and
be orders of magnitude higher compared to SCRs.
1.9 Gate Turn-off Thyristor (GTO) 21
1.9.2 Conduction
The conduction process is similar to that of a conventional SCR. The on-state
voltage is low. Surge current capability is high and the conduction loss is low.
IK VD
IG
25µs
P P P
N N N
P P P
N N N
1.9.3 Turn-off
The turn-off process in the GTO is initiated by passing a negative current
through the gate cathode circuit. The cathode current is then constricted to-
wards the centre of each cathode segment, thus pinching off the cathode cur-
rent. As the cathode current is pinched, the anode current falls rapidly. During
the pinch-off process the active silicon area reduces. Further, the cathode cur-
rent tends to get redistributed away from the extinguishing gate current. This
process takes place during the storage time. This process culminates with
a rising anode voltage and a falling anode current. This phase is the most
critical in the turn-off process and requires the presence of a snubber across
the device to limit the reapplied rate-of-rise-of-anode-voltage to about 500 to
1000 v/µs. This process is shown in Fig. 18. The GTO zone in Fig. 18 is
a vulnerable zone when both anode voltage and cathode current co-exist. In
order to prevent the device from turning on again in this region, it is necessary
22 Power Switching Devices - Characteristics
1.9.4 Blocking
In the blocking state, the GTO behaves just like a PNP transistor. When
the bias supply has negligible impedance, the GTO has practically unlimited
dv/dt capability.
IA
VAK Anode
t
td tr ts tf t tail
IGM I Gate
GC
VG
t
IGQ VGR
Figure 1.19: Drive and Power Circuit Waveforms for the GTO
Typical gate drive waveforms are shown in Fig. 19. GTOs require much
more gate current than a similar rated SCR. The GTO structure is well suited
for high-current pulsed applications on account of their large turn-on rate-of-
rise-of-anode-current capability. The initial gate current IGM and the recom-
mended value of dIG /dt can be taken from the data sheet. A rough guide to
the required value of IGM is that it is about 6 times IGT . For a GTO with 3A
IGT at 25◦ C, IGM is 20A at 25◦ C, or 60A at −40◦ C, for the values of anode
voltage and di/dt cited on the data sheet (50% of Vdrm and 300 to 500A/µS).
1.10 Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) 23
C
C
Forward ON
G
G
E
Cut−off
E
Usually IGBTs are made with a hybrid reverse diode integral to the de-
vice.
2. There is a small voltage drop across the device while ON. The ON state
current is limited.
Von = Vce(sat) 6= 0 ; −ID ≤ Ion ≤ Ic ;
5. The switches take a finite time to switch ON and OFF after the base
drive is established.
ton = td + tr ;
td = on delay time; tr = rise time;
tof f = ts(of f ) + tf ;
ts(of f ) = storage delay time; tf = fall time;
The switching times are designated the same way as those of BJTs.
6. The conduction, blocking, and switching losses raise the junction temper-
ature of the device. To limit the operating junction temperature of the
device, proper thermal design has to be made.
8. The IGBT blocks positive voltage and passes positive current. With an
integral hybrid reverse diode the device can also pass negative current.
1.10 Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) 25
Vgs
Vth
ic
1
t
td ts
Vce
2
t
tr tf
IA IA
P P
N −IG =IA N
P P
IG
VG N VG N
IGK = IA + IG IGK = 0
IK IK
circuit of the blocking state is as shown in Fig. 23. Fig. 22 is identical to the
conducting and blocking states of GTOs. The major difference with IGCT
is that the device can transit from conducting state to blocking state instan-
taneously. The GTO does so via an intermediate state as illustrated in Fig.
18. In IGCT technology, elimination of the GTO zone is achieved by quickly
diverting the entire anode current away from the cathode and out of the gate.
The device becomes a transistor prior to it having to withstand any blocking
voltage at all. Turn-off occurs after the device has become a transistor, no ex-
ternal dv/dt protection is required. IGCT may be operated without snubber
like IGBT or MOSFET. Fig. 24 shows the turn-off process of an IGCT. Notice
1.11 Integrated Gate Commutated Thyristor (IGCT) 27
P
N
P
VG
the absence of the GTO zone. The device behaves like a BJT right from the
VAK
IA
Initiation
of Turn−off
ts
t
Lsnubber IGCT
LS
VG Rsnubber Dsnubber
FWD Load
Fig. 25. The IGCT can be turned on like a GTO with relatively low gate
current. Then it is subject to the same di/dt limitations as a thyristor. It can
also be turned on like a transistor, when the NPN transistor is driven hard.
In such a case, the device has an order of magnitude better di/dt capability.
Typically a hard turn-on IGCT exhibits a monotonically falling anode voltage,
compared to a soft turn-on IGCT that exhibits an oscillatory drop in anode
voltage during turn on.
1.12 Comparisons
Table 1 gives a comparison between GTO and IGCT devices. Table 2 gives
the comparison of performance between IGCT and IGBT.
Junction θ j Junction
P N P N
θc
Case Case
thus established may be used to design heat sinks for the device to limit the
temperature rise of the device junction. Part of this heat generated at the
junction increases the temperature of the junction and the rest flows out of
the junction onto the case of the device and therefrom to the environment of
the device.
Heatsink
P N
Case Junction
θ j
θ j
θ c
Cth Cth
Rth Rth
P(t) P(t)
θ c
θ a
Darlington modules at the high power medium frequency end of the applica-
tion spectrum. With such technology, it has become possible to integrate the
peripheral devices to be built into the power modules. Such devices are clas-
sified as Intelligent Power Modules (IPM). The different levels of integration
achieved and achievable are shown in Fig. 29. The IPM family provides the
Drive &
Protection
Housekeeping Isolation
Power
over-current, and short-circuit protection are all provided by the IPMs inter-
nal gate control circuits. A fault output signal is provided to alert the system
controller if any of the protection circuits are activated. Fig. 30 is a block
diagram of the IPM’s internally integrated functions. This diagram also shows
the isolated interface circuits and isolated control power supply that must be
provided to the IPM. The IPM’s internal control circuit operates from an iso-
Isolated Collector
Power Gate Control Gate Drive
Supply Circuit
Over−temperature
Control Isolated Lockout Temperature
Input Interface Under−voltage Sensor
Lockout
Circuit Over−voltage
Lockout Sense
Isolated Short−circuit Current
Fault Interface Lockout
Output Circuit Emitter
lated 15V DC supply. If for any reason, this voltage falls below the specified
under-voltage trip level, the power devices will be turned off and a fault sig-
nal generated. Small glitches less than the specified tdU V in length will not
affect the operation of the control circuit and will be ignored by the under-
voltage protection circuit. In order for normal operation to resume, the control
supply voltage must exceed the under-voltage reset level (U Vr ). Operation of
the under-voltage protection circuit will also occur during power up and power
down situation. The system controller must take into account the fault output
delay (tf o ).
Application of the main bus voltage at a rate greater than 20V/µs be-
fore the control power supply is on and stable may cause the power device
to fail. Voltage ripple on the control power supply with dv/dt in excess of
5V/µs may cause a false trip of the under-voltage lockout. The IPM has
a temperature sensor mounted on the isolating base plate near the IGBT
chips. If the temperature of the base plate exceeds the over-temperature trip
level (OT), the internal control circuit will protect the power devices by dis-
abling the gate drive, and ignoring the control input signal till the normal-
temperature condition is restored. The over-temperature reset level is (OTr ).
The over-temperature function provides effective protection against overloads
and cooling system failures. Tripping of the over-temperature protection is an
indication of stressful operation. Repetitive tripping is an indication that the
above symptoms exist. The IPM uses current sense IGBT chips. If the cur-
34 Power Switching Devices - Characteristics
rent through the IPM exceeds the specified over-current trip level (OC), for a
period longer than tof f (OC) , the IPM’s internal control circuit will protect the
power device by disabling the gate drive and generating an output signal. If a
+15V
Control
In
Drive
Input Isolated
Control
IPM Terminals Power Supply
Fault
Out
Fault
Output
0V
load short circuit occurs or the system controller malfunctions causing a shoot
through, the IPM’s built-in short circuit protection will prevent the IGBTs
from being damaged. When the current, through the IGBT exceeds the short
circuit trip level (SC), an immediate controlled shut down is initiated and a
fault output is generated. The IPMs employ for short circuit protection actual
current measurements to detect dangerous conditions. This type of protection
is faster and more reliable than the conventional out-of-saturation protection
schemes. It is necessary to reduce the time between short-circuit detection
and short-circuit shut down. In certain IPMs this time may be as small as 100
ns. Tripping of the over-current and short-circuit protection indicates stress-
ful operation of the IGBT. Repetitive tripping is to be avoided. High surge
voltage occurs during emergency shut down, Low inductance bus bars and
snubbers are essential. It is necessary to coordinate the peak current and the
maximum junction temperature. Depending on the power circuit configura-
tion of the IPM, one, two, or four isolated power supplies are required for the
IPM’s internal drive and protection circuits. In high power 3 phase inverters
using single or dual type IPMs, it is a good practice to use six isolated power
supplies. In these high current applications, each low side device must have its
own isolated control power supply in order to avoid ground loop noise prob-
lems. The supplies should have an isolation voltage rating of at least twice
the IPM’s VCES rating. Using bootstrap technique is not recommended for
the control power supply. A typical interface circuit is shown in Fig. 31. The
1.14 Intelligent Power Modules (IPM) 35
IGBT Module
(B) Three Phase Input Power, Medium Output Power (< 100kW ), High
Switching Frequency (> 100kHz)
(C) Half Bridge IPMs or Single Switch IPMs
6. Medical Equipment, High Voltage Power Supplies, Drives
(A) Single Phase Input Power, Low Voltage DC Link (< 200V ), High
Switching Frequency (> 100kHz), Low Output Power (< 5kW )
(B) Half Bridge IPMs
7. Variable Voltage Variable Frequency Drives (VVVF)
(A) Three phase Input Power, High Output Power (100s of kW), Medium
to Low Switching Frequency (1 kHz to 10s of kHz)
(B) Six Pack IPMs
8. Machine Tool Drives
(A) Three phase Input Power, Medium Output Power (10s of kW), Medium
to Low Switching Frequency (1 kHz to 10s of kHz)
(B) Six Pack IPMs
9. HVAC Compressor Drives
(A) Single phase Input Power, Low Output Power (fractional kW), High
Switching Frequency (> 20kHz)
(B) Application Specific IPMs
10. Elevator, Crane Drives
(A) Three phase Input Power, High Output Power (100s of kW), Medium
to Low Switching Frequency (1 kHz to 10s of kHz)
(B) Half Bridge IPMs.
I
ON
1 3
V
OFF OFF
2 4
T1 P
T2 5A 5A −50V 5A
50V
50V
T1 P T2 P
4. The current through and the voltage across a power device is shown in
Fig. 4. Evaluate the average current and the rms current rating of the
device. Evaluate the conduction loss in the device.
Iav = 2.5A
Irms = 4.1A
Conduction loss = 2.5W
i
10A
t
v 1V
t
TS /2 TS
0 θκ π 2π 3π
Iav = 23.75A
Irms = 1.2A
Conduction loss = 28.5W
6. The Thyristor SKAT28F is used in an application carrying half sinusoidal
current of period 1 mS and a peak of 100 A as shown in Fig. 6. The
Thyristor may be modeled during conduction to have a constant voltage
drop of 1.1 V and a dynamic resistance of 8 mΩ. Evaluate the average
conduction loss in the device for this application.
100A
t
0 0.5ms 1.0ms 1.5ms
10Α
0 5 15 20 30 t in µ seconds
2
Iav = 5A ; Irms = 44.44A ; Irms = 6.67A
Losses with BJT = 6W
Vce(sat) = 1.2V ; Rds(on) = 0.15Ω
Losses with MOSFET = 6.67W
8. A disc type Thyristor is shown with its cooling arrangement in Fig. 8.
The device is operating with a steady power dissipation of 200W.
H1 C1 C2 H2
A J A
135A
I D = 0.33
t Rd
100A Vt
I D = 0.5 t
Ib ts
t
250V 75A
Ic
t
Ic Vce 250V
t
Vce tf td
Ic 75A
tr t
Ib = 20A
500V
Vce 250V
400V 400V
20A 20A
t t
tr tf tr tf
(A) the switch-on and switch-off energy loss (in Joule) for resistive load-
ing,
(B) the switch-on and switch-off energy loss (in Joule) for inductive load-
ing, and
(C) the resistive and inductive switching losses in W for a switching fre-
quency of 100 kHz.
3. A power MOSFET has an rds(on) of 50 mΩ. The device carries a current as
shown in Fig. 3. Consider the switching process to be ideal and evaluate
the conduction loss in the device. (It is necessary to evaluate the rms
current through the device. Explore if you can simplify the evaluation of
rms value by applying superposition).
15A
8A 10A
t
10 µ s 15 µ s
and comment on the same. It is observed from the data sheet that the
device withstands short circuit for 6µs at Vge of 15 V and for 15µs at Vge
of 10 V. Comment on this observation.
The thermal process is predominantly a first-order process and is similar in
most applications. The thermal model is related to the physical process of
evacuation of heat to the ambient. This problem set is to apply the sim-
ple steady state and transient thermal models to evaluate temperature rise,
thermal resistance, temperature ripple, etc.
6. The temperature of an oil-cooled transformer when disconnected fell from
75◦ C to 25◦ C in 2 hr. Evaluate the cooling time constant of the trans-
former.
100W
and the ambient. The thermal time constant of the device together with
the heatsink is 1 s. Under this condition, evaluate the excess pulsed power
of duration 0.3 s if the peak temperature rise is not to exceed 100◦ C
12. The MOSFET IRF540 is operating in a circuit with a power dissipation
of 20 W. Evaluate the temperature rise of the junction without external
heatsink and with an external heatsink of thermal resistance 2◦ C/W .
Q1 Q2 10A
rms
I1 I2
RJC1 =12 C/W RJC2 =3 C/W
13. A composite switch (Q1 and Q2 in parallel) carrying a load current of 10A
is shown in Fig. 13. The switches may be considered ideal in switching.
The on-state resistances of the devices Q1 and Q2 are respectively 0.8Ω
and 0.2Ω. The devices are mounted on a common heatsink held at a
temperature of 80◦ C. Evaluate
(A) I1 (rms) and I2 (rms)
(B) the average power dissipation (P1 and P2 ) in Q1 and Q2 .
(C) the junction temperatures of Q1 and Q2 .
14. Figure 14 shows the voltage across and the current through a switch
during off/on transition. The switch-on transition consists of two sub-
intervals (rise time of 0.5 µs and a tail time of 2 µs).
(A) Evaluate power in the device at t = 0.
(B) Evaluate the power in the device at t = 0.5 µs.
(C) Evaluate the power in the device at t = 2.5 µs.
(D) Evaluate the power in the device as a function of time furing the rise
time (P(t) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 0.5µs).
(E) Evaluate the peak power in the device during the rise time 0 ≤ t ≤
0.5µs.
(F) Sketch P(t) for 0 ≤ t ≤ 0.5µs
15. A composite switch used in a power converter is shown in Fig. 15. The
periodic current through the switch is also shown. Evaluate
1.16 Problem Set 45
100V
V 5A
20V
I
t
VON = 0.8V
t
0 5µs 10 µ s 20 µ s 25 µ s
(A) the average current and rms current through the composite switch.
(B) the power loss in the MOSFET and the diode of the composite switch.
16. Visit a manufacturer’s website, identify a controlled power switching de-
vice (BJT, or Darlington, or MOSFET, or IGBT) of rating > 10A and
> 600V . Download the datasheet and fill in the following.
(A) Manufacturer.
(B) Device and Type No.
(C) On-state voltage (V).
(D) Off-state current (A).
(E) Transient switching times (s).
(F) Maximum junction temperature (K).
(G) Recommended drive conditions (?).
(H) Conduction loss at rated current (W).
(I) Blocking loss at rated voltage (W).
(J) Switching energy loss (J).
46 Power Switching Devices - Characteristics
Chapter 2
2.1 Introduction
The conditioning of power flow in PES is done through the use of electro-
magnetic and reactive elements (inductors, capacitors and transformers). In
this section the basics of electromagnetics is reviewed. The type of capacitors
popular in power electronic applications are also given. They are formulated
in such a way as to be useful for the design of inductors and transformers.
I A m2
ε V/m
σ
l
J= σε
2.2 Electromagnetics
The voltage across and current through a conducting element is related through
Ohm’s law. This law may be stated as follows. When an electric field (of in-
tensity V/m) is set up across a conducting material (of conductivity σ 1/Ω
m), there is an average flow of electrical charge across the conducting material
48 Reactive Elements in Power Electronic Systems
Φ A m2
H A/m
µ
l
Β=µH
the magnetic field in the magnetic circuit with resultant magnetic flux. Seen as
an electrical circuit element, the electromagnetic element possesses the prop-
erty of energy storage without dissipation. Ampere’s law and Faradays law
I
I
N
F=I F = NI
relate the electric and magnetic circuits of the electromagnetic element. Am-
pere’s law states that the mmf in a magnetic circuit is equal to the electric
current enclosed by the magnetic circuit. For example for the electromagnetic
circuits shown in Fig. 3, the magnetic circuit mmfs are I and NI respectively.
With further assumption that the magnetic material is isotropic and homoge-
nous, and that the magnetic flux distribution is uniform, we may relate the
magnetic flux in the magnetic circuit as
ΣI NI
Φ= = (2.7)
R R
The above equation may conveniently be put in the equivalent circuit shown
NI R
in Fig. 4. Faraday’s law relates the voltage induced in an electric circuit that
is coupled to a magnetic circuit.
dΦ N 2 di
v=N = (2.8)
dt R dt
The quantity N 2 /R is defined as the inductance of the electric circuit. Thus
an electromagnetic circuit provides us an electric circuit element (inductor).
The voltage across an inductor is directly proportional to the rate of rise of
current through it. The energy stored in the magnetic circuit is
1 1 F2 1 1
E = LI 2 = = Φ2 R = ΦF (2.9)
2 2 R 2 2
The equivalent circuit of an inductor showing both its electric and magnetic
50 Reactive Elements in Power Electronic Systems
i Φ
v L
NI R
R i Ri
v L Rl Rg
NI
• The size of wire to be used for the electric circuit, to carry the rated
current safely.
• The number of turns of the electric circuit to obtain the desired induc-
tance.
2.3 Design of Inductor 51
• No fringing: q
lg << AC (2.20)
8. Recalculate
Irms
J∗ = (2.21)
a∗w
9. Recalculate
N ∗ a∗w
kw∗ = (2.22)
AW
10. Compute from the geometry of the core, mean length per turn and the
length of the winding. From wire tables, find the resistance of winding.
2.3 Design of Inductor 53
I1 I2
V1 V2
V1 = 4 f B m A C N 1 ; V2 = 4 f B m A C N 2 (2.23)
The window for the transformer accommodates both the primary and the
secondary. With the same notation as for inductors,
k w AW = N 1 I1 + N 2 I2 (2.24)
V1 I 1 + V 2 I 2 = 4 k w J B m A C A W (2.25)
V A = 2 f B m J AC AW (2.26)
VA
AC AW = (2.27)
2 f B m J kw
The above equation relates the area product (AC AW ) required for a trans-
former to handle a given VA rating.
• Size of wire and number of turns to be used for primary and secondary
windings.
• Core to be used.
2. Select the smallest core from the core tables having an area product higher
than obtained in step (1).
3. Find the core area (AC ) and window area (AW ) of the selected core.
5. Select the nearest higher whole number to that obtained in step (4), for
the primary and secondary turns.
6. Compute the wire size for secondary and primary.
I1 I2
aw1 = ; aw2 = (2.30)
J J
8. Compute the length of secondary and primary turns, from the mean
length per turn of the core tables.
9. Find from the wire tables, the primary and secondary resistance.
10. Compute from the core details, the reluctance of the core.
lc
R= (2.31)
A C µo µr
close to the ideal at lower frequencies. At higher frequencies, the ESR and the
ESL of the real capacitor make it deviate from the ideal characteristics. For
PES applications, it is necessary that the ESR and ESL of the capacitor are
low.
circuits to couple ac signals from one circuit to another with differing dc po-
tentials. The current carried by such a capacitor is comparatively low. The
important feature of such capacitors is
• High insulation resistance
V1
V2
V1 V2
iC vC
Load iC t
C
iin
vin vo
iC
vin iin
t t
vo
iC t
t
iC vo
t t
i
v v
ui ui
ic
ic t
ic
vc
t
ic
ic
vc
t
AC Capacitors
400V
vc
30 40 50 t
5 10 15 20 25 60
Time in mS
ic 200A 400V
15 20 30 t
5 50 60
50π Α
2
Irms 10779 ESR 0.01Ω
Irms 103.8A Rth 0.2◦ C/W
Loss 107.8W Temperature Rise 21.6◦ C
ESL
ωo
ESR
1 + scR + s2 LC
Z= (2.33)
sC
C is ideal upto a frequency of 18.4 kHz
L 75nH
C 10µF
R 30 mΩ
Natural Frequency 183.8 kHz
AW 40mm2 40mm2
AC 90mm2 90mm2
N 37T 37T
aw 0.29mm2 0.29mm2
lg 0.08mm 1mm
I 0.5A 0.5A
Peak Flux Density 0.29T 0.29T
Window Space Factor 0.27 0.27
Inductance 1.94 mH 0.15 mH
lg1 , Ag1
lg2 , Ag2 R1 R R2
N1 N2
lg , Ag
N1 N2
N12
L1 = (2.34)
RR2
R1 +
R + R2
N22
L2 = (2.35)
RR1
R2 +
R + R1
N1 N2 R
L12 = (2.36)
RR1
R2 + (R + R1 )
R + R1
N1 N2 R
L21 = (2.37)
RR2
R1 + (R + R2 )
R + R2
2.7 Illustrated Examples 65
lg1 1 mm lg2 2 mm
lg 1.5 mm Ag1 40mm2
Ag2 40mm2 Ag 80mm2
N1 100 T N2 200 T
R1 19894368 L1 325.25 µH
R2 39788736 L2 827.9 µH
R 14920776 L12 177.41 µH
R||R1 8526158 L21 177.41 µH
R||R2 10851473
100A
100 µ s 400 µ s
6. Figure 6 shows a lifting magnet used for handling metal billets in a steel
mill. The dc current I to the coil (of N turns) is supplied from a current
source. The area of cross section of the magnetic path is Ae m2 . The
yoke of the magnet and the metal billet may be assumed to be infinitely
permeable. The fringing effect of the field in the path of the magnet may
be neglected.
N Turns Ac x
Steel Billet
(A) Find an expression for the energy stored in the system as a function
of the air gap (x meter).
(B) Find the force exerted by the magnet as a function of the gap length.
lg 2x
R= = (2.38)
A e µo µr A e µo
N2 N 2 A e µo
L= = (2.39)
R 2x
1 N 2 A e µo I 2
E = LI 2 = (2.40)
2 4x
dE N 2 A e µo I 2
F =− = (2.41)
dx 4x2
The above relationship is valid for intermediate values of x. For x close
to zero, infinite permeability assumption is not valid. For large values of
x, negligible fringing assumption (x << Ae ) is not valid.
7. Figures 7 (a, b, and c) show three magnetic circuits with an exciting
winding on each having 100 turns. The core in (c) is obtained by as-
sembling together one each of cores shown in (a) and (b). The magnetic
material for the core may be considered to have very large permeability
with saturation flux density of 0.2 T.
(A) Evaluate the expression for flux linkages (NΦ) for cores (a) and (b)
as a function of the exciting current ia and ib .
(B) Plot the characteristics NΦ vs i for the cores (a) and (b).
(C) From the above plot NΦ vs i for the composite core (c).
(D) Comment on the inductance of the circuit (c).
Na 100 Nb 100
lga 0.001 lgb 0.005
Bmax La 0.00314 N Φ = La ia
Lb 0.000628 N Φ = Lb ib
Sauturation Current for Core A 1.59A
Sauturation Current for Core B 7.96A
1 mm 5 mm
25 mm2
25 mm2
NΦ L = 0.375 mH
L = 0.063 mH
L = 0.315 mH
L = 0.0629 mH t
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Rb
Ra Rc
N a Φa Nb2 (Ra + Rc )
Lb = = (2.43)
ib ia =0 Ra Rb + R b Rc + R c Ra
N b Φb Na Nb Rc
Lab = = (2.44)
ia ib =0 Ra Rb + Rb Rc + Rc Ra
N a Φa Na Nb Rc
Lba = = (2.45)
ib ia =0 Ra Rb + R b Rc + R c Ra
9. Figure 9 shows a coupled magnetic circuit. The two windings are excited
by identical square waves. The core has a cross-sectional area of S unit.
The reluctance of the central limb is Rc unit. The reluctance of the outer
limbs are dominated by the gap reluctances.
(A) Draw the equivalent reluctance circuit model of the magnetic circuit.
(B) Find the self-inductances L11 and L22 .
68 Reactive Elements in Power Electronic Systems
φ 1
φ 2
ii (t) i2 (t)
v(t) N1 i1 N2 i2 Rc
N1 N2 v(t)
Rx =x/S µ ο Ry =y/S µ ο
x/2 y/2
N12 (Rc + Ry )
L11 = (2.46)
Rx Ry + R x Rc + R c Ry
N22 (Rx + Ry )
L22 = (2.47)
Rx Ry + R x Rc + R c Ry
N1 N2 Ry
L12 = (2.48)
Rx Ry + R x Rc + R c Ry
N1 N2 Ry
L21 = (2.49)
Rx Ry + R x Rc + R c Ry
di1 di2 di1 di2
v = L11 + L12 = L21 + L22 (2.50)
dt dt dt dt
di1 L22 − L12
= (2.51)
dt L11 L22 − L21 L12
x
For di1 /dt = 0, L22 = L12 ; y = .
N1 /N2 − 1
Under the above condition for coil 1, the induced voltage equals source
voltage and so rate of change of input current is zero or ripple free.
Chapter 3
3.1 Introduction
In this section we see the issues related to the control, drive and protection
of power switching devices. The ideal requirements are set down and some of
the practical circuits useful in achieving these requirements are given.
4. A fast falling (< 1µS) current of adequate magnitude (IB− ) during the
storage time (typically 5 to 10 µS) of the turn-off period of the switch.
70 Control, Drive and Protection of Power Switching Devices
VB t C
B
VB
iB
2 E
3
iB 1 t
4
VBE t
V+
TB
IB
Switch
Rc
Rb
0
V+
V+
0 R C
IB
Switch
R
V+
IB = (3.2)
R
2V+
IB− = (3.3)
R
V+
V+
V− R C
IB
Switch
R
V−
V+
V+ Das
V− R C
D1
Switch
IB
R
D2
V−
saturation, the Vce drop of the switch becomes low and forward biases Das .
Thus the excess drive is diverted from the base into the collector. Such a drive
will keep the switch on the border of saturation, thereby making the storage
delay time independent of the switch current. However this positive feature
is obtained at the cost of higher conduction loss (Note that the Vce drop now
cannot go below about 0.7V). The base drive shown in Fig. 5 satisfies the
drive requirements 1 to 6.
V+ R C
CS+
Switch
R
Buffer
Cin
Opto
Coupler
V−
V+
ac
CS0
V−
CS+ V+
R C
S Q
555
R Switch
R
V−
V+
ac
CS0
V−
CS+
Switch
Cin
CS0
range of 20 to 50 KHz. Notice the absence of the Baker clamp. The antisatu-
ration circuit is not required, since the base drive is proportional to the switch
current. This circuit is especially useful for switches, which turn on at zero
current (many resonant converters). The control circuit is required to provide
energy to only initiate the turn on and turn off process
V+
CS+
Fault Status
Sense Circuit
V+ V+
Opto V+
Sout
Coupler
3101 311
CS0 V−
V− V−
Rg1 Switch
V+ V+
CS+
C
Buffer Rg2 B
Opto E
Coupler 4425
Cin 3101
V− V−
V+
Isolated
ac Power Supply
CS0 V−
inductive filters). The power circuit will have parasitic inductance associated
with the conducting paths. Further there will be several other non-idealities
of the switches present. On account of all these factors, the switching process
in the device will be far from ideal. Figure 10 shows a simple chopper cir-
cuit consisting of all ideal components except the power switching device (in
this case a BJT). The load being inductive, may be considered to be a con-
stant current branch for the purpose of analysis. The switch voltage, current,
switching energy loss and the v-i trajectory of the switch current and voltage
on the vi plane in course of switching are shown in Fig. 11. The peak power
dissipation in the device is seen to be quite large (VG IL ). The switching loss
will be proportional to the switching frequency and is equal to
3.3 Snubber Circuits for Power Switching Devices 77
IL
VG
C
B
i
Vce IL
t VG v
Switch−on
Transient
Ic
t
Switch−off
Transient
P
i
t IL
tr tf VG v
VG I L t r + V G I L t f
PSW = f (3.7)
2
The practical circuits will have several nonidealities as listed above. The
switching loci with some of these nonidealities are shown in Fig. 12. The
current overshoot (1) is on account of the reverse recovery current of the
diode. The voltage overshoot (2) is on account of the stray inductances and
capacitances in the circuit. The important point to notice is that the peak
voltage and current stresses on the switching device are far more than the
circuit voltage and the load current. The switching loci traverse far from the
axes of the v-i plane, thus indicating large transient losses. When these loci
cross the safe operating area of the v-i plane, device failure is certain. The
purpose of the snubber circuits for power switching devices is to reduce the
switching losses by constraining the switching trajectories to move close to the
78 Control, Drive and Protection of Power Switching Devices
VG Switch−off
C Transient
B
E
Switch−on
Transient
vi axes during the switching transient. From the non-ideal switching loci, it
may be seen that over currents occur during turn-on and over voltage during
turn-off. The snubber ensures that during turn-on rate of rise of current is
limited (with a series inductor), and during turn-off the rate of rise of voltage
is limited (with a shunt capacitor). The other elements in the snubber are
to reduce the effects of turn-on snubber on the turn-off process and turn-off
snubber on the turn-on process. The snubber circuit caters to three functions.
• Turn-off aid
• Turn-on aid
• Over-voltage suppression
IL IL
Large C f
VG Df
VG VG
C Rf Small Cf
B
Cf
E t t
Lo IL VG VG
Do Ro Small L o Large L o
VG Df
IL IL
C Rf
B
Cf
E t t
transient is
I L t2 Cb t 2
VC = = VG (3.11)
2Cf tf C f tf
I L tf
Cb = (3.12)
2VG
Notice that Cf = Cb will make the turn off transient in vc equal to tf . Then
at the border of the two design possibilities,
t2
Vc = V G (3.13)
tf
VG I L t f
Eof f = (3.14)
12
Cf VG2 VG I L t f
ERf = = (3.15)
2 4
VG I L t f
Eof f (total) = (3.16)
3
The device switching off loss has reduced by a factor of 1/6 and the total turn-
off loss by a factor of 2/3. With Cf in the range of 0.5Cb to Cb , the overall
loss is low. The snubber capacitor Cf may be designed based on this criteria.
After selecting Cf , Rf is chosen such that the Rf Cf time constant is much
less than the minimum on time in the given application. This will ensure that
the snubber capacitor is reset during the on time and is ready for the next
turn-off.
IL
Rof
VG Lo
Dof
C
B
Cf
E
IL
IL
• A hard drive of adequate magnitude to quickly (< 0.5µS) charge the gate
source voltage above the threshold voltage Vgs (th). This will ensure low
turn-on loss.
• A steady gate voltage of greater than VGS(th) to keep the device on with a
low on-state resistance rds(on) . Since the gate is isolated from the source,
the current required to maintain the gate source voltage constant is zero.
• A fast falling (< 0.1µS) current drive to initiate turn-off. The magni-
tude of the negative current must be adequate so that the gate source
capacitance is quickly (< 0.5µS) discharged to zero or a negative voltage.
• A gate voltage of adequate negative magnitude during the off period of
the device. This gate voltage that is applied during the off period must
be through a low impedance to ensure good noise margin.
• The drive circuit must be such that the switching performance is insen-
sitive to the operating point of the switch.
• Electrical isolation between the control input and the switch may be de-
sired. This will be necessary very often when the system has several
switches at different electrical potentials.
• The drive circuit must have overriding protection to switch off the device
under fault.
The preferred gate drive is illustrated in Fig. 18. The features are
1. Fast rising gate current for fast turn on.
84 Control, Drive and Protection of Power Switching Devices
VC
B D
iG
G
A t
S
D
C
VGS
+V CC
D
G
−VCC
+V CC
D
VC G
−VCC
+V CC D
G
VC
−VCC
There are several drive circuits, which satisfy these requirements. Some of
these circuits are shown in Figs. 19 to 21. Several commercially available
drive circuits are given in the following links.
Opto-isolated MOSFET/IGBT driver
Hybrid driver
I = 10A ZL
10 µ H
200 V
0.022 µ F
Pof f −snubber = 0.5C V 2 f = 0.5 0.022 10−6 2002 10000 = 4.4 W (3.26)
R
Lm
C
300 V Lm = 20 mH
D = 0.5 T R = 10k
FS = 40000 Hz
V 300
Im = DTS = −3
0.5 25 10−6 = 0.1875A (3.29)
Lm 20 10
2
Em = 0.5 Lm Im = 0.5 20 10−3 (0.1875)2 = 351.6µJ (3.30)
Ploss = Em FS = 14.1W (3.31)
q
VC = Ploss R = 375 V (3.32)
3. The drive circuit shown is used to control the transistor switch S. The
device S requires appropriate continuous positive base current during ON
time and transient negative base current of atleast 1.5 A for atleast 2µS
during OFF time. Evaluate the values of R1, R2, and C.
R1 20 < β < 40
VC
Ib+ = 1 A = ⇒ R1 = 10 Ω (3.33)
R1
500nS
τ = = 455 nS (3.37)
ln(15/5)
88 Control, Drive and Protection of Power Switching Devices
+15 V
VC Rg G
S
VZ = 10 V
τ
Rg = ⇒ Rg = 455 Ω (3.38)
CGS
Off-time noise immunity:
dVDS dVDS
Vth = Rg CDS ⇒ = 109.1 V /µS (3.39)
dt dt
5. The following circuit is a simple non-isolated drive used with a BJT. The
base emitter drop of the power transistor and the drive transistors (Vbe )
are 0.8 V, and 0.7 V respectively. The different parameters relating to
the circuit are: IC = 15 mA; R1 = 3 Ω; R2 = 3 Ω; C = 0.2 µF ;
β ≥ 10; ts = 3 µS; Ton = 20µS; TS = 50 µS. The control input is
as shown.
(A) Sketch the base current waveform.
(B) Evaluate the source/sink current of the control input.
(C) Evaluate the peak current rating of the drive sources.
+10 V Imax = 15 A VC
β = 10 +6 V
β
R1 C
VC IB t
Switch
R2 −6 V
β
25 µ S 25 µ S
5.3 V 5.3 V
0.8 V 0.8 V
2.05 A
τ = 0.6 µS
5.6 A
6. The current through and the voltage across a switching device is given in
Fig. 6. Evaluate the approximate switch-off and switch-on energy loss in
the device.
20 A 30 A
IC 1 µS t
600 V 10 µ S
400 V
Vce 10 µ S
t
Problem Set
1. The following problem is based on the analysis of snubber circuits for
transistor switches. The circuits in Fig. 1.1(a) and 1.1(b) show a typical
switch in a chopper application with and without a snubber network. The
load L, C and R form the inductive load on the chopper. The elements
90 Control, Drive and Protection of Power Switching Devices
Do Ro L
Lo R
Df
C
Rf Cf
+V +V +V +V
I
I I Interval 3 I
Interval 2 Interval 4
Interval 5
I(1 − t/ t f )
+V +V
I
I
Interval 6 Interval 7
IB
IS
IL
t
IC
f
t
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
60 A DF 60 A
I 20 A
600 V R
t
C
01µs 3µs
(B) Evaluate the voltage across the device during switch-off (0 to 3 µs).
(C) Sketch the device voltage following switch-off (0 to 3 µs).
(D) Evaluate the switching loss in the device during turn-off (0 to 3 µs).
(E) Following switch-off, evaluate the time taken for the capacitor C to
get fully charged to 600 V so that the freewheeling diode DF will
conduct.
94 Control, Drive and Protection of Power Switching Devices
Chapter 4
DC-TO-DC Converter
4.1 Introduction
DC-to-DC converters convert electrical power provided from a source at a
certain voltage to electrical power at a different dc voltage. Electrical energy,
though available extensively from storage sources such as batteries, or from
primary converters such as solar cells, distributed ac mains, is hardly ever
used as such at the utilization end. The electrical energy is converted at
the utilization end to forms of energy as required (thermal, chemical, light,
mechanical and so on). Electrical power converter interfaces between the
available source of electrical power and the utilization equipment (heaters,
storage battery chargers, lamps, motors and so on) with its characteristics
demands of electrical power. The need for this interface arises on account of
the fact that in most situations the source of available power and the conditions
under which the load demands power are incompatible with each other. An
example of such a situation is where a 24V lead acid battery is available as
the source of power and the load to be catered consists of digital circuits
demanding power at +5V.
DC-to-DC power converters form a subset of electrical power converters.
Both the output and input power specifications of dc-to-dc converters are in
dc. Most dc loads require a well-stabilized dc voltage capable of supplying a
range of required current, or a variable dc current or pulsating dc current rich in
harmonics. The dc-to-dc converter has to provide a stable dc voltage with low
output impedance over a wide frequency range. These features of the dc-to-dc
converter are known through the output regulation and the output impedance
of the converter. Most dc sources are either batteries or derived by rectifying
the ac mains. The source voltage may vary as much as 40% in the case of
batteries. It may contain substantial superimposed voltage ripple in the case
of rectified supplies. Most dc sources also exhibit a finite source impedance
(against the ideal of zero source impedance). The dc-to-dc converter must
maintain integrity of the output power in the presence of these non-ideal
source characteristics. This capability of the dc-to-dc converters is known
96 DC-TO-DC Converter
through the line regulation, ripple susceptibility, and the input impedance
of the converter. This chapter on dc-to-dc converter deals with the switched
mode dc to dc converter, their basic topologies, and principle of operation,
operating modes, and their steady state performance characteristics [22, 32].
Is Rc Io Vo
Vg Ic
R
Rc Io Vo Is Rc Io Vo
Vg Vg Ic
R R
The output voltage, power loss, and the efficiency of power conversion may be
found as follows.
Vg R Ic RRc
Vo = − (4.9)
R + Rc R + Rc
Pl = Vo Ic + (Ic + Io )2 Rc (4.10)
Vo I o
η= (4.11)
Vg I o + I c
The following features of the converter may be observed from the above set of
relationships.
2. The power loss in the converter never reaches zero for any positive value of
the control quantity. Remember that in a series controlled regulator, the
power loss in the converter was zero at either end of the control quantity
(Rc = 0, and Rc = ∞).
In practice, the series controlled regulator is realized with a series pass tran-
sistor used as a controlled resistor. The shunt-controlled regulator is realized
with a shunt constant voltage diode (zener) used as a controlled current sink.
The circuits are shown in Fig.1.3
(β+1) Ic Vo Rc IZ V o
Ic VZ
Vg R Vg IZ > 0 R
Ic = K (Vo*−Vo)
Vo* IZ Io
Vo = V Z (4.13)
Vo Vg − V o
≤ (4.14)
R Rc
The series controlled and the shunt-controlled regulators are commonly known
as linear regulators. They are simple to analyze and design. The major draw-
back of linear regulators is their poor efficiency. The losses in such converters
appear as heat in the series and shunt elements. The design of such converters
must also take into account effective handling of the losses, so that the tem-
perature rise of the components is within the safe limits. The linear regulators
are therefore used only for low power levels, a few watts in the case of shunt
regulators and a few tens of watts in the case of series regulators. For cater-
ing to loads in excess of these limits and/or for applications where efficiency
is very important (space applications), linear regulators are not suitable. In
such applications, switched mode power converters are standard. In the next
section we see the basic principles of switched mode dc-to-dc converters.
ON Vo (t)
OFF
Vg R
It was mentioned that the seed idea of switched mode power conversion
came from the fact that the power dissipation in a series controlled regulator
is zero at either end values of the control quantity Rc, namely Rc = 0 and Rc =
∞. The core of switched mode dc-to-dc converter is obtained by replacing the
series pass element (Rc) of the series controlled regulator by a switch. The
circuit is shown in Fig. 4. The switch may occupy either of the position ON
and OFF. The ON position connects the source (V g) to the output (Vo ). This
100 DC-TO-DC Converter
Vo (t)
Vg
Vo
t
0 dTS Ts
output voltage is therefore variable between 0 and Vg . There are no losses in the
converter. The power dissipation in the switch is zero during both the ON and
OFF states. Therefore the converter has ideally no losses. However the output
voltage is not pure dc. The output apart from the desired average voltage
(dVg ), also has superimposed alternating voltage at switching frequency. Real
dc-to-dc converters are required to provide nearly constant dc output voltage.
A real dc-to-dc converter therefore consists of a low pass filter also apart from
the switches. The function of the low pass filter is to pass the dc power to the
load and to block the ac components at the switching frequency from reaching
the output of the converter. In order to achieve efficient operation, the low
pass filter is realized by means of non-dissipative passive elements such as
inductors and capacitors.
u=1
ig (t) T1 u=0 L i(t) Vo (t)
T2
Vg
R
2. For a fraction of the switching period (u = 1), the pole P of the switch is
connected to Vg through the throw T1 . The ON time per cycle is dTs .
3. For the rest of the switching period (u = 0), the pole P of the switch is
connected to zero volts through the throw T2 . The OFF time per cycle
is (1 − d)Ts .
Vp
u=0 u=1 t
i(t)
I(K) I(K+1)
I’(K)
The voltage obtained at the pole of the switch is a function of time and is
shown in Fig. 7.
102 DC-TO-DC Converter
In every cycle from kTS to (k + d)TS (k = 1, 2, 3...), the pole of the switch is
connected to Vg . During ON time,
di
Vg = L + Ri (4.16)
dt
In every cycle from time (K + d)TS to (K + 1)TS (K=1, 2, 3...), the pole P of
the switch is connected to the ground.
,
di
0=L + Ri (4.20)
dt
0
i[(k + d)TS ] = I (k) (4.21)
When we redefine time from the start of the OFF time of the k th cycle,
−Rt
0
i(t) = I (k)e L (4.22)
−R(1 − d)TS
0
I(k + 1) = I (k)e L (4.23)
If the initial condition i(0) is known, the inductor current i(t) may be found
out from the above equations cycle by cycle. We may also solve for the steady
state by forcing I(k) = I(k + 1) in the above set of equations.
4.3 Switched Mode Power Converters 103
−RdTS ( −RdTS !)
0 Vg
I = Ie L + 1−e L (4.26)
R
−R(1 − d)TS
0
I =I e L (4.27)
( RdTS )
−
1−e L
0 Vg
I = (4.28)
R ( RTS )
−
1−e L
If we choose the converter element L and the operating switching period such
that L/R << TS then the exponential terms may be approximated by the first
two or three terms of the series to obtain the following approximate results. If
the result given in Eq. (1.28) confirms our assumption that the ripple factor
0
is indeed low and that I is approximately equal to I when L/R << TS .
Average Current:
0
I +I dVg
' (4.30)
2 R
Ripple Current:
Vg d(1 − d)TS
δI ' (4.31)
L
Ripple Factor:
δI (1 − d)RTS
= δi ' (4.32)
I L
104 DC-TO-DC Converter
Current buildup in the inductor over a period is zero under steady state.
Z TS 1 Z TS
di = vL dt = 0 (4.34)
0 L 0
We may express this in words, as ”the inductor volt-sec integral over a cycle is
zero under steady state”. We may use this criterion along with the assumption
that the current ripple is low and the consequent voltage ripple across the load
is nearly zero. Such an approach considerably simplifies the analysis. Consider
the two sub-circuits of the primitive converter under steady state shown in
Fig. 8. The following are the key points of the analysis.
2. Volt -sec integral across an inductor over a cycle is zero under steady state.
The dual of this property (Amp-sec integral through a capacitor under
steady state is zero over a cycle) is also useful in some other converters.
Vg i L Vg i L
R R
ON Period OFF Period
dVg
Vo = dVg ; I = (4.36)
R
4.3 Switched Mode Power Converters 105
Current Ripple:
During the ON time of the switch the current in the inductor rises linearly
with di/dt = (Vg − Vo )/L; (since vo (t) ' Vo .)
Z TS 1 Z TS (Vg − Vo )dTS
δI = di = (Vg − Vo )dt = (4.37)
0 L 0 L
δI (1 − d)RTS
= δi = (4.38)
I L
Voltage ripple:
(Vg − Vo )RTS
δVo = RδI = (4.39)
L
δVo (1 − d)RTS
= δv = (4.40)
Vo L
In order that our analysis results are valid, δv must be small. We may ensure
i(t)
Io
t
dTS TS
ig (t)
this by imposing the condition from Eq. (39) that (TS << L/R) the switching
period is very much smaller than the natural period (L/R) of the circuit. In
the primitive converter that we considered the switch is ideal and so also the
inductor. There are no losses in the converter and so the efficiency is unity.
The input current and the output current of such a converter is shown in Fig.
9. It may be assumed that the output voltage ripple and the inductor current
ripple are small as per the foregoing analysis.
1 TS 1 dTS
Z Z
Ig = ig (t) dt = Io dt = dIo (4.41)
TS 0 TS 0
This result is in general true for all loss-less converters. The forward voltage
transfer ratio will be the same as the reverse current transfer ratio. It is easy
to see that the product of the voltage transfer ratio and current transfer ratio
is the efficiency of the converter. The efficiency is obviously unity in the case
of loss-less converters.
Vsn
Rl L
Rg
Vsf
R
Vg
R
Vo = dVg (4.44)
R + Rl + dRg
= Ideal gain * Correction Factor.
The current transfer ratio is unaffected by these (series) nonidealities.
Io 1
= (4.45)
Ig d
The overall efficiency of the converter is,
Vo I o R
η= = (4.46)
Vg I g R + Rl + dRg
In a similar way the nonideality of the switches may also be taken into account.
Applying volt-sec balance
" # " #
Vg − Io Rg − Vsn − Io Rl − Vo dTS = Vsf + Io Rl + Vo (1 − d)TS (4.47)
4.4 More Versatile Power Converters 107
" # " #
Vsn Vsf (1 − d) R + Rl + dRg
dVg 1 − − = Vo (4.48)
Vg dVg R
" #" #
Vsn Vsf (1 − d) R
Vo = dVg 1 − − (4.49)
Vg dVg R + Rl + dRg
The correction factor consists of two terms; one corresponding to the parasitic
resistances in the circuit and the other corresponding to the switch nonideali-
ties. Since the current transfer ratio is unaffected, the voltage gain correction
factor directly gives the efficiency of power conversion also.
Buck Converter d
1−d
1−d
Boost Converter d
The extension of the primitive dc-to-dc converters to the next level of com-
plexity yields the three basic real converter topologies as shown in Fig. 11.
These converters consist of one single pole double throw switch (SPDT), one
inductor, and one capacitor each. These three converters are named the buck,
the boost, and the buck-boost converters respectively [14, 15]. The steady
state analysis of these converters may be done following the same methods
developed for primitive converter.
108 DC-TO-DC Converter
u
t
iL
dTS (1−d)TS
t
Io
t
δI
iC t
Vo t
δVo
ig
The buck converter steady state waveforms are shown in Fig. 12 We may apply
the assumption that the output voltage ripple is low (δv = δVo /Vo << 1).
Voltage gain
Vo = dVg (4.50)
Current ripple
In each sub period [dTS and (1−d)TS ], the rate of change of current is constant.
δIo (1 − d)RTS
= δi = (4.52)
Io L
4.4 More Versatile Power Converters 109
Voltage ripple
The charging and discharging current of the capacitor (hatched region in Fig.
12) decides the voltage ripple. We consider that the ac part of the inductor
current flows into the capacitor.
δQ 1 1 δIo TS
δVo = = (4.53)
C C2 2 2
Vo (1 − d)TS2
δVo = (4.54)
8LC
δVo (1 − d)TS2
= δv = (4.55)
Vo 8LC
Input Current
The average of the source current is found as for the primitive converter.
Ig = dIo (4.56)
Validity of Results
u
t
iL
dTS (1−d)TS
t
Io
iC t
Vo t
δVo
ig
Voltage gain
Current Ripple
In each sub-period [dTS and (1−d)TS ] the rate of change of current is constant.
Vg dTS
δIL = (4.61)
L
δIL d(1 − d)2 RTS
= δi = (4.62)
IL L
Voltage Ripple
The charging and discharging current of the capacitor (hatched region in Fig.
13) decides voltage ripple. We consider that the entire ac part of the inductor
current flows into the capacitor.
δQ Io dTS
δVo = = (4.63)
C C
δVo dTS
= δv = (4.64)
Vo RC
Input Current
The average of the inductor current is the same as the average source current.
Io
Ig = (4.65)
1−d
Validity of Results
η 0.75
M = Vo /V g η = Efficiency
0.5
Μ 0.25
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
4. The parasitic resistance in the converter degrades the gain of the con-
verter. The gain though ideally is a monotonically increasing function,
in reality on account of the parasitic resistances, falls
√ sharply as the duty
ratio approaches unity. It reaches a peak of (1/2 α [α = (Rl + Rg )/R],
and falls rapidly to
√ zero at d = 1. The duty ratio at which this peak oc-
curs is at d = 1 − α. The efficiency at this duty ratio will be 0.5, which
is quite low. Therefore there is an indirect limit on operating duty ratio.
In practice boost converters are not operated beyond a duty ratio of 1/2
to 2/3. The gain and the efficiency of a boost converter (with α = 0.02)
are shown as a function of duty ratio in Fig. 14.
5. The ideal efficiency is unity. When the nonidealities are considered the
efficiency degrades. The efficiency of power conversion is good when
Rl , Rg << R; Vsn << Vg ; Vsf << Vo and at low duty ratios.
" #" #
dVsn Vsf (1 − d) 1
η = 1− − α (4.67)
Vg Vg 1+
(1 − d)2
6. The input current is continuous. Therefore the boost converter is less
sensitive to the dynamic impedance of the source compared to the buck
converter.
Voltage Gain
u
t
iL
dTS (1−d)TS
t
Io
iC t
Vo t
δVo
ig
When the parasitic resistance of the inductor Rl and the source resistance Rg
are taken into account, the voltage gain gets degraded.
( )
Vg 1 Rl Rg
Vo = ; α= ;β = (4.69)
1−d α + βd R R
1+
(1 − d)2
Current Ripple
In each sub period [dTS and (1−d)TS ] the rate of change of current is constant.
Vg dTS
δIL = (4.70)
L
Voltage Ripple
The charging and discharging current of the capacitor (hatched region in Fig.
15) decides the voltage ripple. We consider that the entire ac part of the
114 DC-TO-DC Converter
Input Current
The average source current may be obtained from the average inductor current.
dIo
Ig = (4.74)
1−d
Validity of Results
5. The ideal efficiency is unity. When the nonidealities are considered the
efficiency degrades.
" #" #
Vsn Vsf (1 − d) 1
η = 1− − (4.77)
Vg dVg α + βd
1+
(1 − d)2
The efficiency of power conversion is good when and Rl , Rg << R; Vsn <<
Vg ; Vsf << Vo at low duty ratios.
6. The input current is discontinuous and pulsating. It will therefore be
necessary to have an input filter also with buck-boost converter, if the
source is not capable of supplying such pulsating current.
L Vo
R
Vg C
L Vo
R
Vg C
Vo
R
Vg L C
Table 1 gives the summary of the steady state results for the three basic con-
verters. The practical realization of the three converters with controlled (tran-
sistor) and uncontrolled (diode) switches for unidirectional power conversion
is shown in Fig. 16.
1 d
Ideal d -
1−d 1−d
Gain
2 2 2
Duty ≤d≤1 0≤d≤ 0≤d≤
3 3 3
Ratio
1 1 1
Rl and Rg
1 + α + βd α+β α + βd
1+ 1+
(1 − d)2 (1 − d)2
in order that the load connected to the dc-to-dc converter sees an ideal dc
voltage source at the output of the converter. However, the inductor current
in the dc-to-dc converter is an internal quantity of the converter and it is not
necessary that the inductor current ripple is small. We have seen that the
current ripple in all the basic converters is a function of [TS /(L/R)]. It is
possible to operate the converter at low switching frequency or with a low
value of inductance where the current ripple is high. We have also seen that
4.5 Discontinuous Mode of Operation in dc to dc Converters 117
the ripple voltage in all the basic converters is inversely proportional to the
filter capacitance. Hence it is possible to independently control the voltage
ripple to be small (with high ripple current). A typical buck converter realized
Vg L R
dTS (1−d)TS
iL Io
with electronic switches and the inductor current waveform is shown in Fig.
17. The transistor conducts during dTs and the diode conducts during d2 Ts .
Consider the case when Ts is further increased keeping ”d” to be the same.
The current waveform is shown in Fig. 18. Notice that now the currents
through the switching elements tend to be bi-directional. The power circuit
shown in Fig. 17 cannot support this mode of operation since the switches can
carry only unidirectional current. In such a case the converter enters a mode of
operation called the discontinuous inductor current mode (DCM) of operation.
In such an operation the inductor current starts in every cycle from zero current
and before the end of the cycle falls back to zero. The discontinuous mode
(DCM) of operation results in steady state performance that is different from
the continuous inductor current mode of operation (CCM) that we have seen
earlier.
dTS (1−d)TS
iL Io
the output voltage is assumed to have negligible ripple. The current in the
inductor periodically goes to zero. There are three sub-periods in a cycle.
Vg L R L R L R
C C C
t
vL Vg −Vo
−Vo
1. During dTS , energy is pumped from the source and the inductor current
ramps up.
2. During d2 TS , energy from the reactors feed the load and the inductor
current ramps down.
Voltage Gain
Vo d
= (4.79)
Vg d + d2
This is not a very useful form of result. d is the control input and is the
independent variable. d2 depends on d and the circuit parameters TS , L, R
etc. It will be more useful to determine the gain Vo /Vg (defined M) in terms
4.5 Discontinuous Mode of Operation in dc to dc Converters 119
Current Ripple
In each sub period, the rate of change of current is constant; (Vg −Vo )/L during
dTS , Vo /L during d2 TS , and zero during the rest of the period.
Vo d 2 TS
δIL = IP = (4.85)
L
δIL 2
= δi = (4.86)
IL d + d2
Voltage Ripple
The voltage ripple is decided by the capacitor current (hatched region in Fig.
19)
δQ (d + d2 )(IP − Io )2
δVo = = (4.87)
C 2CIP
!2
1
1−
δVo δi
= δv = (4.88)
Vo RC
120 DC-TO-DC Converter
Input Current
Kcri = (1−d)
Kcri
K = 2L/RTS
L Vo
R
Vg C
R Vo
Vg
R Vo
Vg L C
Table. 2 shows the quantities of interest in the other converters when they are
operated in DCM. It is left as an exercise to carry out the analysis and verify
these quantities. In case, the converters are to be operated only in CCM,
realizing the switches in the converter with bi-directional switches as shown in
Fig. 21 is needed.
122 DC-TO-DC Converter
d d + d2 d
Ideal -
d + d2 d d2
Gain
s
4d2
( )
1+ 1+
K 2 K K √
d2 s K
d d 2
( )
4K
1+ 1+ 2
d
Rl
1 1 1
and
1 + α + βd α+β α + βd
1+ 1+
(1 − d)2 (1 − d)2
Rg
Vsn
Vsf Vsf Vsn (1 − d)Vsf Vsn (1 − d)Vsf
and 1− − 1− − 1− −
Vg dVg Vg Vg Vg dVg
Vsf
majority of the dc-to-dc converters require that the input and the output
are galvanically isolated form each other. Several circuits with the feature of
isolation between the input and output are derived from these basic converters.
Some of these isolated converters are briefly indicated in this section.
n:1
Vg VZ
(a)
n:1
Vg
n:n
(b)
Vg
n:1
(c)
Vg
n:1
n:1
Vg
(a)
n:1
Vg
(b)
transformer. The gain of the converter is Vo /Vg = d/n where the duty ra-
tio d is seen on the secondary output. The secondary switches are passive
switches (diodes). There is no possibility of saturation of the isolation trans-
former on account of the dc blocking employed in the primary circuit. The
ripple frequency at the output is double the switching frequency of the pri-
mary switches. Both DCM and CCM operation are possible. Most high power
converters (above 200 W) are designed with bridge circuits.
Vg n:1
Rs R
Vg Vz
(A) Evaluate the range of load resistance for which the output voltage
will be regulated.
(B) Evaluate the maximum power dissipation in Rs and Vz .
2. The superposition principle and Thevenin’s theorem may be applied to
find an equivalent circuit of Fig. P1. This is shown in Fig. P2 below.
(A) Evaluate k1 .
(B) Evaluate k2 .
(C) Evaluate Rth .
(D) Evaluate line regulation (δVo /δVg ) - for this δVz and δIo are zero.
(E) Evaluate line regulation (δVo /δIo ) - for this δVz and δVg are zero.
4.7 Problem Set 127
k1Vz Rth Vo
k2Vg R
D1 L1 S1 L2 Vo
C1 D3 R
Vg D2 C2
1 1 D L
2/3
Vg = 30V D C R
T
D = 0.3; Vt = 1 V; V d = 0.7 V
5. Figure P5 shows a fly back converter operating at a duty ratio of 0.3. The
transistor ON state drop is 1 V. The diode ON state drop is 0.7 V. The
resistance of the inductor windings is 0.5Ω and 0.25Ω for the primary and
secondary respectively.
D Vo
1 1/2 R = 20 Ω
Vg = 30V C
RP = 0.5Ω RS = 0.25Ω
T
D = 0.3; Vt = 1 V; V d = 0.7 V
(A) Evaluate the voltage conversion ratio and efficiency of the converter.
6. Figure P6 shows a forward converter operating at a duty ratio of 0.4.
Assume the components to be ideal. Sketch the following waveforms
under steady state.
1 1 D L Vo
1/2 R=6Ω
Vg = 30V D C
T
D = 0.4 ; L = 1 mH ; C = 20 µF ; TS = 50 µ S
L TS = 50 µ S
C = 500 µ F
30 V T R = 50 Ω
D C D = 0.5
(A) Evaluate the value of L such that the converter operates in the dis-
continuous mode.
(B) Evaluate the diode conduction time and the output voltage under
such condition.
8. The following circuit shown in Fig. P8 shows a variant of the boost con-
verter. The inductor used is a coupled inductor. Assume the components
to be ideal.
N1 N2 (1−d)T Vo
Vg S
dTS
N1 Vo
Vg (1−d)TS
N2 dTS
L Vo
Vg = 300 V R
1 C
40
1 FS = 20 kHz Vo = 5 V
L = 0.5 mH C = 10 µ F
R = 0.5 Ω
10. Figure P10 shows a half bridge converter. Make suitable simplifying as-
sumptions. Evaluate the
(A) Operating duty ratio.
(B) Current ripple in the inductor.
(C) Voltage ripple at the output.
(D) Average input current under steady state.
11. The output section of an SMPS is shown in Fig. P11. The duty ratio
seen on the secondary side is 0.8. The dc current through the inductor is
10A with negligible ripple.
D1
D2
N1 N2 L1 = 5 mH
(1−d)TS
C = 470 µ F
30 V dTS S C R TS = 20 µ S
D = 0.5
S S
Vg L1 S L2
S R
C1 C2
Vo
Ig R1
C
β R
R2
Vg L1 C1 L2
R
dTS (1−d)TS C2
D 5V, 4A
45 4
C
Vg = 120 V T TS = 20 µ S
LS = 10 µ H
L Vo
Vg = 120 V 1 R
C
Cf 14
1 FS = 20 kHz Vo = 5 V
L = 0.5 mH C = 10 µ F
R = 0.5 Ω
18. Consider the circuit given in Fig. P18. Carry out the steady state analysis
for the same and evaluate the following.
Rds(on)= 0.028 Ω
0.05 Ω L 0.8 V R
15 V D = 0.3 C
D 10V @ 10A
1 1/2 Rc C = 1000 µF
Vg Rc = 0.02 Ω
C D = 0.5
S
S1 15 V @ 1.5 A
48 V I
Ι1 Ι2
1:0.5
S1 TS = 50 µ S
(A) Evaluate L such that the freewheeling diode conducts for one half of
the OFF interval of switch S1 .
(B) Evaluate the operating duty ratio under this condition.
(C) Evaluate the value of C such that the output voltage ripple is 1%.
(D) Sketch the waveforms of I1 , I2 , and I. Mark the salient features.
Chapter 5
DC-TO-DC Converter –
Dynamics
5.1 Introduction
Switched mode power converters (SMPC) consist of switches for the control
of power flow, and reactive circuit elements (inductors and capacitors) for
attenuating the switching ripple (low pass function) in the output power. The
basic power circuit topologies of SMPC were seen in Chapter 4. Evaluation
of steady state performance of the converter such as voltage gain (Vo /Vg ),
efficiency (η), output voltage ripple (δv ), inductor current ripple (δi ), etc
are shown in Chapter 4 for the ideal converter as well as converters with
different types of non-idealities. Ideally the steady state gain was found to
be independent of the switching frequency and load and dependent only on
the switching duty ratio (d = Ton /TS ), in the continuous current mode of
operation (CCM). In the discontinuous mode of operation (DCM), the voltage
gain was found to be a function of switching frequency and the load as well
through the conduction parameter (K = 2L/RTS ). The output voltage of a
real converter will also depend on the non-idealities in the converter such as
the switch voltage drops etc. As a result an SMPC operating with a fixed
duty ratio (open loop control) will not be able to maintain the output voltage
of the converter fixed. The disturbances that are encountered are changes
in Vg , the switch voltage drops and their dependence on ambient conditions,
parasitic elements in the converter, and drifts in the control circuit on account
of ambient variations. Therefore it is essential that the SMPC be controlled
in a closed loop with appropriate feedback to regulate the output voltage
of the SMPC. In order to apply the theory of control and to design suitable
closed loop controllers for the SMPC, it is essential that a dynamic model for
different types of SMPC be developed [14, 15, 17, 29, 33]. The purpose of
this chapter is to consider the SMPC as a system and develop an appropriate
dynamic model for the converter.
136 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
Vg Vo
S L
R
C
Ton
TS
Vp
Vc
Ramp Generator
Figure 1 shows a typical pulse width modulated switched mode power con-
verter consisting of a switch, an inductor, and a capacitor. Power is supplied
to the converter at a dc voltage of Vg . The converter feeds power to the load
(R) at a voltage of Vo . The switch is operated at a high switching frequency
with a switching period TS . The switch is kept ON during a fraction (dTS )
of the switching period. For the rest ((1 − d)TS ) of the switching period, the
switch is OFF. The generation of the switch control signal is by the popular
ramp-control voltage comparison method. It may be verified that the switch-
ing duty ratio d is related to the control voltage Vc and the peak of the ramp
voltage Vp as follows [21, 37].
Vc
d= (5.1)
Vp
The non-idealities in the converter may be identified as VT (the ON state
switch voltage drop), VD (the OFF state switch voltage drop), Rc (parasitic
resistance of the capacitor), and R1 (parasitic resistance of the inductor). We
may represent the black box model of the converter as shown in Fig. 2. The
following model quantities may be identified.
• d - The duty ratio d is defined as the control input, since the output
voltage control of the converter is through the control of the switch duty
ratio.
• Vg - The power supply input is not under the control of the designer.
Apart from the available dc level Vg , the source will also have superim-
posed ac input v̂g (t). In a true dc-to-dc converter, the output voltage must
5.2 Pulse Width Modulated Converter 137
VT VD
Vg Vc
L, C, R, R c , Rl Il
d
associated with each energy storage element of the converter. The inductor
current is a dynamic variable and so also the capacitor voltage. There will
be as many dynamic variables for the converter as there are energy storage
elements in the converter. By dynamic equations of the converter is meant the
equations, which relate the rate of change of dynamic variables, inputs and
the parameters of the converter.
What are output equation? The equation relating the output(s) of the
converter to the dynamic variables of the converter is the output equation of
the converter. The first step in the dynamic modeling of the converter is to
write down the dynamic and output equations of the converter for the circuits
obtained in the converter for each of the switch positions in the converter. The
following example illustrates the step of writing the dynamic equation of the
converter.
On Vc Vo
Il L
Off R
Vg C
Fig. 3 shows the buck converter operating in CCM. For the sake of simplic-
ity, all elements are considered ideal. The power to the converter is supplied
from the source at voltage V g. The switch operates at high switching frequency
with a switching period TS . For a fraction (dTS ) of the switching period, the
switch is in the ON state. Energy is then drawn from the source and the
inductor charges up the increasing Il . The output voltage is Vo . During the
rest [(1 − d)TS ] of the switching period, the switch is in the OFF state. No
energy is then drawn from the source. The inductor transfers part of its energy
then to the load with decreasing il . There are two linear circuits obtained in
the converter, one corresponding to each of the switch (ON & OFF) position.
These two circuits are shown in Fig. 4a and 4b. The circuit in Fig. 4a is the
equivalent circuit of the converter during the ON (dTS ) duration. The circuit
in Fig. 4b is the equivalent circuit of the converter during the OFF [(1 − d)TS ]
duration. The dynamic elements in the converter are L & C. The dynamic
variables of the converter are i1 and vc . The dynamic equations relate the
change of change of [dil /dt] and [dvc /dt] of the dynamic variables to the input
(vg ), the parameters of the converter (L, R and C) and the dynamic variables
(il and vc ) of the circuit. The output equations may be found by the algebraic
relationship between the output of the circuit and the dynamic variables of
5.3 An Idealized Example 139
Vc Vo Vc Vo
Il L Il L
R R
Vg C C
On Circuit Off Circuit
di1 1
dt 0 −
L
where ẋ =
; A1 = A 2 =
;
dvc
1 1
−
dt C RC
1
L
0
b1 = ; b2 = ; q1 = q2 = [0 1] x;
0 0
Equations [12] & [14] are referred to as the output equations. Equations [11]
& [13] are referred to as the dynamic equations or the state equations of the
converter for each of the sub-periods of the switching period.
VT
VD
Rg Rl Rc
C R
Vg L
VT vo vo
Rc VD Rc
Rl Rl
Rg Rg
vc vc
Vg L R Vg L R
il C il C
(a) (b)
capacitor Rc . The equivalent circuit of the converter for the ON and OFF
duration are as shown in Fig. 6a and 6b respectively.
The ON duration equations are
dil
vg = il (Rl + Rg ) + VT + L (5.15)
dt
dvc R
ic = C =− (5.16)
dt R + Rc
R
vo = v c (5.17)
R + Rc
The OFF duration equations are
dil
v0 = i l Rl + V D + L (5.18)
dt
dvc vo
ic = C = −il − (5.19)
dt R
R RRc
vo = v c − il (5.20)
R + Rc R + Rc
Substituting for vo from [Eqn. 20] into [Eqn. 18 & 19], we get
dil RRc R
L = −VD − il Rl − il + vc (5.21)
dt R + Rc R + Rc
dvc R R
C = −il − vc (5.22)
dt R + Rc R + Rc
We may write the dynamic equations of the converter as follows.
ON duration:
dil vg Rg + R l vT
= − il − (5.23)
dt L L L
dvc vc
=− (5.24)
dt C(R + Rc )
R
vo = v c (5.25)
R + Rc
OFF Duration:
!
dil vD il RRc R
=− − Rl + − vc (5.26)
dt L L R + Rc L(R + Rc )
dvc il R vc
=− − (5.27)
dt C R + Rc C(R + Rc )
R RRc
vo = v c − il (5.28)
R + Rc R + Rc
142 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
where ẋavg is the average rate of change of dynamic variables over a full switch-
ing period. The above equivalent description is valid if ẋdTS and ẋ(1−d)TS are
constant during the ON and OFF duration respectively. This will be valid
assumption if the ON and OFF durations are much less compared to the nat-
ural time constants of the respective circuits. Then for the averaged dynamic
variables,
ẋ = A x + b vg + e vT + n vD (5.38)
vo = q x (5.39)
A = A1 d + A2 (1 − d) ; b = b1 d + b2 (1 − d) ; e = e1 d + e2 (1 − d) ;
n = n1 d + n2 (1 − d) ; q = q1 d + q2 (1 − d) ;
Eqns [38] & [39] represents the equivalent dynamic and output equations of
the converter. Since the averaging process has been done over a switching
period, the equivalent model is valid for time durations much larger compared
to the switching period (or valid for frequency variations much smaller than
the switching frequency). As a thumb rule the equivalent model may be taken
to be a good approximation of the real converter for a dynamic range of about
a tenth of the switching frequency.
Rl L VD
Rg Rc
VT C R
Vg
Rl L Rl L VD
Rg Rc Rg Rc
VT C vc R C vc R
Vg Vg
il il
(a) (b)
verter shown in Fig. 7. For the sake of simplicity, the converter is taken to
be ideal. Fig 8a & 8b show the ON and OFF duration equivalent circuits
obtained in the converter. It may be verified that the averaged model is
ẋ = A x + b vg (5.43)
vo = q/x (5.44)
di1 1−D
0 −
1
dt L
; b = L ; q = [0 1] ;
ẋ =
;A=
dvc 1−D 1
− 0
dt C CR
The steady state solution is
X = −A−1 /b/Vg (5.45)
Vo = q/X (5.46)
1 1−D
− −
LC
RC L
A−1 =
;
(1 − D)2
1−D
0
C
Vg
Il R(1 − D)2
= (5.47)
Vo Vg
1−D
Vg
Vo = (5.48)
(1 − D)
The ON and OFF durations models and the averaged model of the converter
shown in Fig. 8, taking into account the non-idealities (Rl , Rc , VT , VD ) are left
5.5 Averaged Model of the Converter 145
1 1
L
0 −L
b2 = ; e2 = ; n2 = ; q2 = [−aRc a] ;
0 0 0
Vg − DVT − (1 − D)VD Rl
Il = " # ; α= (5.49)
R
R α + a(1 − D)β + a(1 − D)2
We may now consider that the inputs d and vg are varying around their qui-
escent operating points D and Vg respectively.
dˆ v̂g
d = D + dˆ ; << 1 ; vg = Vg + v̂g ; << 1 ;
D Vg
These time varying inputs in d and vg produce perturbations in the dynamic
variables x (X + x̂) and vo (Vo + v̂o ).
" # " # !
Ẋ + x̂˙ = A1 d + A2 (1 − d) (X + x̂) + b1 d + b2 (1 − d) Vg + v̂g (5.54)
" #
Vo + v̂o = q1 d + q2 (1 − d) (X + x̂) (5.55)
" # " # !
X̂ +x̂˙ = A1 (D+d)+A
ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ
2 (1−D− d) (X +x̂)+ b1 (D+ d)+b2 (1−D− d) Vg +v̂g
" # (5.56)
ˆ + q2 (1 − D − d)
Vo + v̂o = q1 (D + d) ˆ (X + x̂) (5.57)
The above equations may be expanded and separated into dc (steady state)
terms, linear small signal terms and non-linear terms. When the perturbations
in d and Vg are small, the effect of the non-linear terms will be small on the
overall response and hence may be neglected.
0 = A X + b Vg ; DCM odel (5.58)
" #
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b v̂g + (A1 − A2 )X + (b1 − b2 )Vg d;
ˆ Linear M odel (5.59)
5.5 Averaged Model of the Converter 147
The steady state solution (X) is obtained from Eqn. [58] and used in Eqn.
[59] to get the following small signal dynamic model of the converter.
vo = q x̂ + (q1 − q2 ) X dˆ (5.61)
A = A1 D + A2 (1 − D) ; b = b1 D + b2 (1 − D) ; q = q1 D + q2 (1 − D) ;
" ! ! #
f= A1 − A2 X + b1 − b2 Vg ; X = A−1 bVg ;
v̂o (s)
= q (sI − A)−1 b (5.63)
v̂g (s)
Control Transfer Functions (v̂g = 0)
x̂(s)
= (sI − A)−1 f (5.64)
ˆ
d(s)
v̂o (s)
= q (sI − A)−1 f (5.65)
ˆ
d(s)
Nonidealities in the converter such as the winding resistance, ESR of the ca-
pacitors, switch drops etc. may be readily incorporated in this averaging
method. The idealized transfer functions of the basic converters are given
here.
Buck Converter:
î(s) D (1 + sCR)
= " # (5.66)
v̂g (s) R L 2
1 + s + s LC
R
î(s) Vg (1 + sCR)
= (5.67)
ˆ
" #
d(s) R L 2
1 + s + s LC
R
148 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
v̂o (s) 1
= D" # (5.68)
v̂g (s) L
1 + s + s2 LC
R
v̂o (s) 1
= Vg " (5.69)
ˆ
#
d(s) L
1 + s + s2 LC
R
Boost Converter:
î(s) 1 (1 + sCR)
= " # (5.70)
v̂g (s) R(1 − D)2 L LC
1+s + s2
R(1 − D)2 (1 − D)2
î(s) Vg (2 + sCR)
= (5.71)
ˆ
" #
d(s) R(1 − D)3 L 2 LC
1+s +s
R(1 − D)2 (1 − D)2
v̂o (s) 1 1
= " # (5.72)
v̂g (s) (1 − D) L LC
1+s 2
+ s2
R(1 − D) (1 − D)2
L
1−s
v̂o (s) Vg R(1 − D)2
= (5.73)
ˆ
" #
d(s) (1 − D)2 L 2 LC
1+s + s
R(1 − D)2 (1 − D)2
di
vg = L + iRl + VT (5.78)
dt
dvc vo
0=C + (5.79)
dt R
R R
vo = v c ; Def ine =a (5.80)
R + Rc R + Rc
di Rl
1
1
− 0
dt
L
i
=
+
L L
vg +
vT ; N ote n1 = 0
a
dvc vc
0 − 0 0
dt RC
(5.81)
= A 1 x + b 1 vg + e 1 vT + n 1 vD (5.82)
h i
vo = q 1 x = 0 a x (5.83)
di
vg = L + iRl + VD + vo (5.84)
dt
dvc vo
i=C + (5.85)
dt R
R RRc
vo = v c +i (5.86)
R + Rc R + Rc
di RL + aRc a
1
1
− −
dt
L L
i
=
+
L L
vg +
vD ; N ote e2 = 0
a a vc
dvc
− 0 0
dt C RC
(5.87)
= A 2 x + b 2 vg + e 2 vT + n 2 vD (5.88)
h i
vo = q 2 x = aRc a x (5.89)
Combining the above two subsystems, we get the averaged description.
= A x + b v g + e vT + n vD (5.90)
150 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
On modulation and separation of small signal terms we get the small signal
model.
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b v̂g + f dˆ (5.91)
vo = q x̂ + (q1 − q2 ) X dˆ (5.92)
A = A1 D + A2 (1 − D) ; b = b1 D + b2 (1 − D) ; q = q1 D + q2 (1 − D) ;
" ! ! #
f= A1 − A2 X + b1 − b2 Vg ; X = A−1 bVg ;
Rl Rc
X = −A−1 [b vg + e vT + n vD ] Def ine : = α/; =β (5.93)
R R
a (1 − D)a
−
−1 LC
RC C
A =
Do
(1 − D)a
RL + a(1 − D)Rc
− −
L L
2 2 2
Do = aα + (1 − D)a β + a (1 − D)
Vg − DVT − (1 − D)VD (1 − D)(Vg − DVT − (1 − D)VD )
I= ; Vc =
RDo Do
The above expressions may be evaluated for the following component values
and operating parameters. Vg = 15V ; Rl = 1 Ω ; Rc = 0.5 Ω ; D = 0.3 ;
fs = 20 kHz ; R = 100 Ω ; L = 2 mH ; C = 150 µF ; For the above boost
converter at D = 0.3, the ideal and actual transfer functions are as follows.
5.6 Circuit Averaged Model of the Converters 151
s
K 1−
v̂o (s) ωz
= (5.96)
ˆ s2
!
d(s) s
1+ + 2
Qωo ωo
The gain Magnitude and Phase plots of the control transfer functions for the
60 0
50
-50
40
30
Phase in degree
-100
Gain in dB
20
10 -150
0
-200
-10
-20 Gain(dB) vs Frequency
Phase vs Fequency -250
-30
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
Frequency in log (Hz)
Figure 5.9: Control Gain and Phase of the Non-ideal Boost Converter
ideal and non-ideal converters are shown in Fig. 9. The important points to
notice are
3. The actual Q of the complex pole pair varies widely from that of the ideal
Q.
4. The zero caused by the ESR of the capacitor is important at higher fre-
quencies. This zero is given by ωd = 1/CRc .
5. The phase of the actual gain is less than that of the ideal gain. This is
on account of the change in Q at lower end, and the presence of the ESR
at higher end of frequencies.
6. The ideal gain predicts instability when unity gain feedback is employed,
whereas the actual gain predicts stability (though with low stability mar-
gins). This is in general true (less losses, closer to instability).
152 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
Vg i = io [(1/(1−d)]
C R
Vo Vo +v^o
L L
C R Vg +v^ g C R
(1−d):1 ( 1 − D − ^d ):1
L V+v^
^v ^ ^v
g −d
D ^i ^ ^i
−d
^
−dV
Vg
(1−D)v^ (1−D)I ^ I
−d
(1−D)V
L ^v
^ I
−d
^^ (1−D)I V
^v V (1−D)V −d v
g g
C
^
−dV ^ ^i
−d R
(1−D)v^ D ^i
L ^v
^v ^
−dV D ^i ^ I
−d
g
C
(1−D)v^ R
(1−D):1
L ^v
^v −dV
^ (1−D)v^ D ^i
g
C
^ R
d I/(1−D)
(1−D):1
Fig. 12. The steady state and the transient terms may be separated as shown
in Fig. 13. Notice the nonlinear terms in the model. The linear small signal
model may be obtained by neglecting the nonlinear and the dc terms. Such
a simplified model is shown in Fig. 14. This model may be transformed
through the stages shown in Fig. 15 through Fig. 18. The canonical circuit
154 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
^v L ^v
g
d^ V
C
R
d^ V/R(1−D)2
d^ V/R(1−D)2
(1−D):1
^v ^v
g L
d^ V d^ sLV/R(1−D)2
C
R
d^ V/R(1−D)2
(1−D):1
^v L ^v
g
d^ 1 − sL/(1−D)2 V C R
d^ sLV/R(1−D)2
(1−D):1
is then obtained by keeping all the independent and dependent on one side
and reflecting all the passive elements to the load end as shown in Fig. 19.
After averaging, the small signal ac dynamic model to the converter may be
expressed through the canonical model given in Fig. 20.
!
sL
u(s) = 1 − (5.97)
R(1 − D)2
!
V
J(s) = (5.98)
R(1 − D)2
5.7 Generalised State Space Model of the Converter 155
^v ^v
g
u(s) d^ L/(1−D)2
C R
J d^
(1−D):1
^v ^v
g
u(s) d^ Converter
Passive R
J d^ Circuit
(1−D):1
In the previous chapter we had seen the basis for the state space averaging
method. It was possible through this method to obtain the small signal linear
equivalent model for the converter. From the small signal linear model it was
possible to obtain the input and control transfer functions of the converter.
In many applications it will also be necessary to know the input and output
impedances of the converter. These functions are required to assess the perfor-
mance of the converter in a slightly different way with certain extra synthetic
inputs. Such a model of the converter is referred to as the generalized model
of the converter.
vg ig vo
Converter iz
d
Averaged Matrices
A = A1 D + A2 (1 − D) ; b = b1 D + b2 (1 − D) ;
m = m1 D + m2 (1 − D) ; k = k1 D + k2 (1 − D) ;
q = q1 D + q2 (1 − D) ; p = p1 D + p2 (1 − D) ;
Perturbed Variables
x = X + x̂ ; vo = Vo + v̂o ;
ig = Ig + îg ; vg = Vg + v̂g ;
5.7 Generalised State Space Model of the Converter 157
d = D + dˆ ; iz = îz ;
v̂o (s) n ˆ o
F = d = 0; îz = 0;
v̂g (s)
The audio susceptibility of the converter quantifies the amount of input vari-
ations that will reach the output as a function of frequency.
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b v̂g
x̂ = (sI − A)−1 b v̂g
v̂ = q x̂
F = q (sI − A)−1 b (5.102)
Input Admittance:
îg (s) n ˆ o
Yin = d = 0; îz = 0;
v̂g (s)
Input Admittance of the converter relates as to how the converter interfaces
with the load.
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b v̂g
x̂ = (sI − A)−1 b v̂g
îg = p x̂
îg = p (sI − A)−1 b
Output Impedance:
v̂o (s) n ˆ o
Zo = d = 0; v̂g = 0;
îz (s)
The output impedance relates to the capacity of the converter to cater to
dynamic loads.
x̂˙ = A x̂ + m îz
158 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
îg = p x̂ + (p1 − p2 ) X dˆ ;
îg = (p1 − p2 ) X dˆ + p (sI − A)−1 f dˆ + p (sI − A)−1 b v̂g ;
J dˆ = Gi dˆ + Yin v̂g ;
v̂g
J = Gi + Yin ;
dˆ
J = Gi − Yin u(s) ;
Gv
J = Gi − Yin (5.108)
F
5.8 Some Examples 159
0
m1 = m 2 = m = 1 ;
C
p1 = 1 0 ; p2 = 0 0 ;p = D 0 ;
k1 = k 2 = k = 0 ;
L
Define: Ds = 1 + s + s2 LC ;
R
1 1
s + RC −
L
LC
(sI − A)−1 = ;
Ds
1
s
C
Audio Susceptibility:
D
F = q (sI − A)−1 b = (5.109)
Ds
Input Admittance:
D 2 1 + sCR
Yin = p (sI − A)−1 b = (5.110)
R Ds
160 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
Output Impedance:
sL
Zo = q (sI − A)−1 m = (5.111)
Ds
Control Gain:
Vg
Gv = q (sI − A)−1 f + (q1 − q2 ) X = (5.112)
Ds
DVg DVg (1 + sCR)
Gi = p (sI − A)−1 f + (p1 − p2 ) X = (5.113)
R RDs
C
k1 = k2 = k = 0 ;
p1 = p 2 = p = 0 1 ;
q1 = q 2 = q = 0 1 ;
Vg
(1 − D)L
f = ;
Vg
−
RC(1 − D)2
5.8 Some Examples 161
L 2 LC
Define: Ds = 1 + s + s ;
R(1 − D)2 (1 − D)2
1 (1 − D)
s+ −
LC RC L
(sI − A)−1
= ;
(1 − D)2 Ds (1 − D)
s
C
Audio Susceptibility:
1
F = q (sI − A)−1 b = (5.116)
(1 − D)Ds
Input Admittance:
1 1 + sCR
Yin = p (sI − A)−1 b = 2
(5.117)
R(1 − D) Ds
Output Impedance:
sL
Zo = q (sI − A)−1 m = (5.118)
(1 − D)2 Ds
Control Gain:
sL
1−
Vg R(1 − D)2
Gv = q (sI − A)−1 f + (q1 − q2 ) X = (5.119)
(1 − D)2 Ds
Vg (2 + sCR)
Gi = p (sI − A)−1 f + (p1 − p2 ) X = (5.120)
R (1 − D)3 Ds
Vg
J= (5.122)
R(1 − D)3
162 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
C
k1 = k 2 = k = 0 ;
p1 = 1 0 ; p2 = 0 0 ;p = D 0 ;
q1 = q 2 = q = 0 1 ;
DVg
(1 − D)L
f = ;
Vg
−
RC(1 − D)2
L LC
Define: Ds = 1 + s 2
+ s2 ;
R(1 − D) (1 − D)2
1 (1 − D)
s + RC − L
LC
(sI − A)−1 =
;
(1 − D)2 Ds (1 − D)
s
C
Audio Susceptibility:
1
F = q (sI − A)−1 b = (5.123)
(1 − D)Ds
5.9 Dynamic Model of Converters Operating in DCM 163
Input Admittance:
D2 1 + sCR
Yin = p (sI − A)−1 b = 2
(5.124)
R(1 − D) Ds
Output Impedance:
sL
Zo = q (sI − A)−1 m = (5.125)
(1 − D)2 Ds
Control Gain:
sL
1−
Vg R(1 − D)2
Gv = q (sI − A)−1 f + (q1 − q2 ) X = (5.126)
(1 − D)2 Ds
DVg (1 + D + sCR)
Gi = p (sI − A)−1 f + (p1 − p2 ) X = 2
+ (5.127)
R(1 − D) R(1 − D)3 Ds
Interval d2 Ts :
(ẋ) = A2 x + b2 vg (5.131)
Interval (1 − d1 − d2 )Ts :
(ẋ) = A1 x + b1 vg (5.132)
x̂˙ = A x + b vg + f dˆ + g dˆ2
(5.133)
x̂˙ ˆ dˆ2 ;
= f1 x̂, v̂g , d,
Now the relationship between dˆ and dˆ2 may be found from the boundary
condition on Ip .
D2 = f2 (D, Vg , Vo ) ;
If the above step is done correctly, the state velocity for the inductor current
will turn out to be zero, because the net change in inductor current from the
beginning of a cycle to the end of a cycle is zero. The system equations will
then be
v̂o = f5 î, v̂o , v̂g , dˆ
(5.135)
Eqn. (3.6) is still not the desired form because is present in it. The inductor
current may be eliminated from Eq. (3.6) as follows.
imax
ˆ v̂g , v̂o ;
i = = f6 d,
2
On perturbation,
5.9 Dynamic Model of Converters Operating in DCM 165
v̂o , v̂g , dˆ ;
î = f7
v̂o , v̂g , dˆ
v̂o = f ∗ (5.136)
Eqn. (3.9) represents the small signal linearised dynamic model of the con-
verter in DCM. The method is illustrated in the following section for the fly
back converter.
(1 − d − d2 )TS
dTS d 2 TS Vo
Vg
R
L i C
Interval dTs :
di dvo vo
L = vg ; C =− ;
dt dt R
Interval d2 Ts :
di dvo vo
L = vo ; C = −i − ;
dt dt R
Interval (1 − d1 − d2 )Ts :
di dvo vo
L = 0;C = − ;
dt dt R
The state equation in the usual notation are:
x̂˙ = A x + b vg + f dˆ + g dˆ2
(5.137)
1
0 0 0 − 0 0
L
A1 = ; A2 = ; A3 =
1
1 1
1
0 −
−
0 −
RC C RC RC
166 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
1
L
0 0
b1 =
; b2 =
; b3 =
;
0 0 0
D2
0 − D
L L
A =
;b =
;
D2 1
− 0
C RC
Steady state solution:
1 D2
D
−
LC RC L L
X = −A−1 bVg = − 2 Vg ;
D2
D2
− 0 0
C
DVg
RD22
X =
;
DVg
−
D2
D
Vo = − Vg (5.138)
D2
Vg
I = (5.139)
RK
The small signal model of the converter is
Vg
L
f = (A1 − A3 )X + (b1 − b3 )Vg =
;
0
DVg
−
D2 L
g = (A2 − A3 )X + (b2 − b3 )Vg = ;
DVg
−
RCD22
The small signal model in the state space form is
DVg
D2
0
D
Vg −
L D2 L
x̂ + L v̂g + L dˆ +
x̂˙ = ˆ
d2
DVg
D2 1
− − 0 0 −
C RC RCD22
From the above equation dˆ2 may be eliminated with the help of the following
relationship.
vg dTS v o d 2 TS
Ip = =− ;
L L
5.10 Problem Set 167
Vg D D2
dˆ2 = − dˆ − v̂g − v̂o ;
Vo Vo Vo
The system equation on elimination ˆ2 , reduces to
of d
0 0 0 0
x̂˙ = ˆ
x̂ +
v̂ g +
d
D2 2 D V
g
− −
− −
C RC D2 RC D2 RC
From the above equation î may be eliminated with the help of the following
relationship
DVg 2L Vg ˆ D
I= ;K= ; î = d+ v̂g ;
RK RTs KR KR
Substitution for î leads to
2 2D 2Vg ˆ
v̂o = − v̂o − v̂g − d (5.140)
RC D2 RC D2 RC
v̂o (s) M Vo
= s ; M = (5.142)
v̂g (s) 1+ Vg
ωp
As expected the inductor current in the converter operating under DCM has
ceased to be a state of the converter and hence the order of the converter has
reduced by 1. However both the gain as well as the characteristic frequency
of the converter is not very much dependent on the operating point through
2
M (Vo /Vg ), the conduction parameter K, as well as load (ωp = ).
RC
Rl L d (1−d) Rc v
i
Vg C R
v D = 0.5 ; R = 10 Ohm
Rl L d (1−d) Rc
i Vg = 60 V
Vg C R Rc = 0.1 Ohm
Rl = 0.2 Ohm
3. Consider the buck converter shown in Fig. 3. The dynamic model of the
converter may be written as
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b v̂g + f dˆp
Where dp is the duty ratio of the power switch. The control transfer
function is given by
v̂(s) 10
= ;
dˆp (s) s s2
1 + + 2
Qωo ωo
Q = 3.8 ; ωo = 2π(2055)rad/sec ;
In real converters, the duty ratio of the power switch and the duty ratio as
commanded by the driver (dc ) are not the same on account of the storage
delay time of the power-switching device. This is illustrated in Fig. 4b.
The duty ratios and are related to each other as follows
i ts
dp = d c + 1 −
imax TS
Where ts , TS , Imax , and I are respectively, storage delay time of the
switch, switching period of the switch, maximum current through the
switch, and the switching period of the converter. For the above con-
verter,
TS = 25µS ; ts = 5µS ; Imax = 10A ;
Take into account the storage delay effect as modeled above and evalu-
ate the corrected control transfer function of the buck converter. Make
comments on your result.
4. The converter shown in Fig. 4 is a tapped boost converter. Consider the
core flux Φ and the capacitor voltage Vc as the state variables.
5.10 Problem Set 169
5V
L
T D
10 V C
(A) Write down the dynamic equations of the converter during the ON
time (S ON) and OFF time (S ON).
(B) Write down the averaged dynamic equations.
(C) Find the steady state solution of the core flux Φ and the capacitor
voltage Vc .
5. Consider the buck-boost converter shown in Fig. 5. The converter is
operating under DCM, the state space averaged model for the converter
is
d2
d
0
i̇ L
i L
= + vg
v̇ d2 1 v
− − 0
√ L RC
Under steady state, D2 = K, where K is the conduction parameter
2L/RTS .
(A) Find the steady state values for V and I.
170 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
D V
Vg T I
L C
(B) We wish to control this converter by keeping the duty ratio D and
input voltage Vg constant and by varying the switching frequency fs
= (Fs + fˆs ), around the steady state operating frequency Fs . Under
such a condition, we have also seen that the small signal model is
î v̂
v̂˙ = −D2 − 2
C RC
v̂(s)
(C) Evaluate the small signal transfer function for the converter and
fˆ(s)
comment on the salient points of this transfer function.
6. The following circuit in Fig. 6 shows a three state boost converter [0 <
d1 < 0.5 ; 0 < d2 < 0.5].
L P T2
T3 C R
T1 d1TS d2TS
Vg TS
(A) How many independent switch control inputs are there? What are
they?
(B) Evaluate the gain as a function of the control inputs.
(C) Sketch the steady-state inductor current waveform for one cycle.
(D) Write down the state equations of the converter for each switch po-
sition.
(E) How will you realize the switches P T1 , P T2 , and P T3 .
7. Figure 7a shows a Cuk converter. Its averaged model and canonical small
signal ac model are shown in Figs 7b and 7c respectively.
5.10 Problem Set 171
(a) V2 (b) V2
(1−d):1 1:d
I1 L1 L2 I2 I1 L1 L2 I2
V1
Vg R Vg CV R
1
(1−d):d
Le L2
U(s) d
R
vg J(s) d Ce
(c)
dTS (1−d)TS
(A) Evaluate the averaged model of the converter in the following format.
di
= f1 (i, vo , vg , d)
dt
dvo
= f2 (i, vo , vg , d)
dt
vo = g(i, vo )
(B) Evaluate the small signal linear model of the converter when excited
with inputs d = D + d,ˆ vg = Vg + v̂g , in the state space format where
T
x = [i vo ] , and the dynamic quantities are the ac perturbations in
the variables.
172 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b v̂g + f dˆ
v̂o = q x̂
!
v̂o (s)
(C) Evaluate the small signal transfer function of the con-
ˆ
d(s) v̂g =0
verter
9. The circuits of a boost converter in its ON duration and OFF duration
are shown in Fig. 9. The dynamic variables of the converter are i and vo .
The output of the converter is i.
dTS (1−d)TS
(A) For each of the circuits, write down the state equations and the out-
put equation in the following format, where x = [i vo ]T .
x̂ = A1 x̂ + b1 v̂g
î = p1 x̂
x̂ = A2 x̂ + b2 v̂g
î = p2 x̂
(B) Evaluate the averaged model of the converter when the converter is
operating with a duty ratio D in the following format.
x̂ = A x̂ + b v̂g
î = p x̂
(C) Solve the system of equations to get the steady state current I in the
inductor and the steady state voltage Vo .
!
î(s)
(D) Evaluate the steady state input impedance of the converter
v̂g (s)
of the converter.
10. The circuits of a boost converter in its ON duration and OFF duration
are shown in Fig. 10. The dynamic variables of the converter are i and
vo .
(A) Evaluate the averaged model of the converter in the following format.
di
= f1 (i, vo , vg , d)
dt
5.10 Problem Set 173
dTS (1−d)TS
dvo
= f2 (i, vo , vg , d)
dt
vo = g(i, vo )
(B) Evaluate the small signal linear model of the converter when excited
with inputs d = D + d,ˆ vg = Vg + v̂g , in the state space format where
T
x = [i vo ] , and the dynamic quantities are the ac perturbations in
the variables.
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b v̂g + f dˆ
v̂o = q x̂
!
v̂o (s)
(C) Evaluate the small signal transfer function of the con-
ˆ
d(s) v̂g =0
verter
11. The circuits of a buck-boost converter in its ON duration and OFF du-
ration are shown in Fig. 11. The dynamic variables of the converter are
i and vo . The output of the converter is ig .
dTS (1−d)TS
(A) For each of the circuits, write down the state equations and the out-
put equation in the following format, where x = [i vo ]T .
x̂ = A1 x̂ + b1 v̂g
î = p1 x̂
x̂ = A2 x̂ + b2 v̂g
î = p2 x̂
(B) Evaluate the averaged model of the converter when the converter is
operating with a duty ratio D in the following format.
x̂ = A x̂ + b v̂g
174 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
î = p x̂
(C) Solve the system of equations to get the steady state current I in the
inductor and the steady state voltage Vo .
!
îg (s)
(D) Evaluate the steady state input impedance of the converter
v̂g (s)
of the converter.
12. Figure 12 shows a multiple output forward converter. The converter data
are as follows.
Vg = 100V ; D = 0.4 ; N : N1 : N2 = 1 : 0.3 : 0.125 ;
R1 = 12 Ω ; R2 = 0.5 Ω ; L1 = 1.5 mH ;
L2 = 0.15 mH ; C1 = 33 µF ; C2 = 33 µF ;
Rc1 = 0.1 Ω ; Rc2 = 0.05 Ω ; Rl1 = 0.5 Ω ;
Rl2 = 0.03 Ω ; Rs1 = 0.3 Ω ; Rs2 = 0.01 Ω ;
Rp = 0.02 Ω ;
Circuit Equations in dTS :
P ẋ = A1 x + b1 vg + m1 iz
v o = q 1 x + k 1 iz
ig = p 1 x
L1 0 0 0
0 L2 0 0 vo1 iz1
P = ; vo = ; iz = ;
0 0 C1 0
vo2 iz2
0 0 0 C2
!T
iL1 iL2 vC1 vC2
x = ;
Circuit Equations in (1 − d)TS :
P ẋ = A2 x + b2 vg + m2 iz
v o = q 2 x + k 2 iz
ig = p 2 x
(A) Evaluate the system matrices.
13. Figure 13 shows a multiple output flyback converter. The converter data
are as follows.
Vg = 50V ; D = 0.3 ; N : N1 : N2 = 1 : 1 : 0.5 ;
R1 = 5 Ω ; R2 = 2 Ω ; Lp = 1.0 mH ;
Ls1 = 1.0 mH ; Ls2 = 0.25 mH ; C1 = 470 µF ;
C2 = 1000 µF ; Rc1 = 0.05 Ω ; Rc2 = 0.03 Ω ;
Rs1 = 0.1 Ω ; Rs2 = 0.04 Ω ; Rp = 0.1 Ω ;
5.10 Problem Set 175
Rl1 L1 vo1
Rp Rs1 iL1 R1
Rc1
ip (1−d)
C1
N1 iz1
Vg
N
vo2
iL2 Rl2 L2
N2 R2
(1−d) Rc2
C2 iz2
d Rs2
Lp 0 0
vo1 iz1
P =
0 C1 0
; vo =
; iz =
;
vo2 iz2
0 0 C2
!T
ip vC1 vC2
x = ;
Circuit Equations in (1 − d)TS :
P ẋ = A2 x + b2 vg + m2 iz
v o = q 2 x + k 2 iz
ig = p 2 x
(A) Evaluate the system matrices.
14. The circuit shown in Fig. 14 is an isolated fly back converter. Evaluate
the system matrices A1 , A2 , b1 , b2 , m1 , m2 , q1 , q2 , k1 , k2 , p1 , and p2 .
Vg = 100V ; D = 0.3 ; Np : Ns = 1 : 0.2 ;
Rp = 1.0 Ω ; Rs = 0.5 Ω ; L = 1.5 mH ;
C = 100 µF ; Rc = 0.1 Ω ; Rl = 0.5 Ω ;
R = 20.0 Ω ;
176 DC-TO-DC Converter – Dynamics
L1 vo1
Rp Rs1 R1
Rc1
ip (1−d)
C1
N1 iz1
Vg
N
R2 vo2
L2
N2
(1−d) Rc2
C2 iz2
d Rs2
Rp
ip
Vg
Np
vo
Rc
Ns R
(1−d)
Rs C iz
d
15. For the converter shown in Fig. 15, the various ON state and OFF state
matrices are given.
ON Time:
5.10 Problem Set 177
0 0
1
0
i̇ i
=
+
L
vg +
iz
1 1
v̇ 0 − v 0 −
RC C
v = [0 1] [i v]T
ig = [1 0] [i v]T
OFF Time:
1
1 0
0 −
i̇
i
L
L
= + vg + iz
1
1 1
v̇ v 0 −
− C
C RC
v = [0 1] [i v]T
ig = [1 0] [i v]T
i v
L
Vg C R iz
6.1 Introduction
We have seen the objective of obtaining constant dc output voltage from the
converter is achieved through the closed loop control of the output i.e. constant
duty ratio is automatically adjusted in order to obtain the desired output
voltage. In the last chapter we had seen the basic theory of linear dynamics
and the principles of closed loop control [16]. In this chapter the control
requirements of the dc-dc converter are stated and are related to the frequency
domain performance indices such as the loop gain, cross-over frequency, dc
loop-gain, phase margin of the loop gain and so on. The closed loop controller
design is briefly outlined and then demonstrated through the example of a
boost converter.
transient overshoot, the phase margin may be taken as 45◦ . The first design
step in closed loop controller design is to convert the control specification to
the following.
• Desired T(0) [to meet the steady state error]
• Desired ωc [to meet the settling time]
• Desired phase margin φm [to meet the transient overshoot]
Vo*
H1 (s) H2 (s) d
Vo
on the poles and zeroes nearest to the crossover frequency. With the above
simple rule in mind, the compensator function H1 (s) is selected to be simple
lead-lag compensator.
s
1+
ωz1
H1 (s) = K1 s (6.1)
1+
ωp1
The purpose of is to make the slope of crossover section of the loop gain to
-20 dB/decade near the desired crossover frequency, and to improve the phase
margin.
• If G(s) is a first order system in the vicinity of ωc , then H1 may be just
K1 .
• If G(s) is a second order system in the vicinity of ωc , then select ωz1 and
ωp1 such that ωz1 < ωc < ωp1
• If G(s) is a second order system with a complex pole pair ωo then ωz1
may be taken as ωo . ωp1 is usually as ten times ωz1 .
• H2 (s) must not affect the gain & phase margin already designed. Or in
the other words, phase and magnitude gain of H2 (s) in the vicinity of ωc
must be 0◦ and 0dB respectively.
s
1+
ωz2
• A PI controller of the form H2 (s) = s satisfies the above require-
ωz2
ments.
The overall compensator is
s s
1+ 1+
ωz2 ωz1
H(s) = s K 1 s (6.2)
1+
ωz2 ωp1
and can be realized using operational amplifiers (as shown in the example).
182 Closed Loop Control of Power Converters
40 0
30 -50
20
-100 Phase in degree
Gain in dB
10
-150
0
-200
-10
Gain(dB) vs Frequency
Phase vs Fequency -250
-20
0 1 2 3 4 5
Frequency in log (Hz)
Figure 6.2: Magnitude and Phase Plot of the Open Loop Transfer Function
It may be noticed that the 0dB crossover frequency is about 2000 rad/sec, &
the phase margin with unity feedback is about 5◦ . The dc gain of 28 leads
to steady state error with unity feedback of about 4%. To meet the given
specifications therefore a compensator has to be added. As a first step in the
design of compensator, we select H1 (s) (to meet bandwidth & phase margin)
as follows
6.2 Closed Loop Control 183
40
35 0
30
Phase in degree
25 -50
Gain in dB
20
15 -100
10
5 -150
Gain(dB) vs Frequency
Phase vs Fequency
0
0 1 2 3 4 5
Frequency in log (Hz)
Figure 6.3: Gain and Phase with the First Part of the Compensator
s
1+
H1 (s) = 1288.0 (6.4)
s
1+
12880.0
Notice that the compensating zero is taken as the same as ωo . The Bode
25
20 0
15
Phase in degree
10 -50
Gain in dB
0 -100
-5
-10 -150
Gain(dB) vs Frequency
Phase vs Fequency
-15
0 1 2 3 4 5
Frequency in log (Hz)
Figure 6.4: Gain and Phase with the Second Part of the Compensator
plot of G(s)H1 (s) is plotted in Fig.3. It is seen that the phase has improved.
The 0 dB crossover may now be set near 1000Hz by selecting K1 equal to 0.2.
The loop gain of is plotted in Fig.4 for this new. It is seen that for this new
the 0 dB crossover frequency is about 7000 rad/sec, and the phase margin is
more than 55◦ . The first part of the design is complete. With H1 (s) as a
compensator both bandwidth and phase margin requirements are met. Notice
184 Closed Loop Control of Power Converters
also that the dc gain is only about 5 (15 dB). Therefore to meet the steady
state error specification we chose a PI controller of the form
s
1+
ωz2
H2 (s) = s (6.5)
ωz2
ωz2 (700) is chosen much less than ωc . The loop gain of G(s)H1 (s)H2 (s)
60
50 0
40
Phase in degree
30 -50
Gain in dB
20
10 -100
-10 -150
Gain(dB) vs Frequency
Phase vs Fequency
-20
0 1 2 3 4 5
Frequency in log (Hz)
Vo*
−Vo
d
F : Audio Susceptibility;
Yin : Input Admittance
Zo : Output Impedance
When a closed loop compensator is added to the converter the overall structure
Vg
Vo
Converter
Vo* d
h(s)
iz
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b v̂g + f dˆ
(6.7)
v̂o = ( q1 − q2 ) X dˆ + q x̂ (6.8)
dˆ = − h v̂o (6.9)
q
v̂o = −h ( q1 − q2 ) X v̂o + q x̂ = x̂ (6.10)
1 + h(q1 − q2 )X
Substituting the result of Eq. (10) in Eq. (7), we get
hq [sI − A]−1 f
x̂ = (sI − A)−1 b v̂g − x̂ (6.11)
1 + h(q1 − q2 )X
hq [sI − A]−1 f q
q x̂ = q (sI − A)−1 b v̂g − x̂ (6.12)
1 + h(q1 − q2 )X
q x̂ + q x̂h(q1 − q2 )X + hq(sI − A)−1 f q x̂
= q (sI − A)−1 bv̂g (6.13)
1 + h (q1 − q2 ) X
186 Closed Loop Control of Power Converters
îg = p(sI − A)−1 bv̂g − h(p1 − p2 )X v̂o − hp(sI − A)−1 f v̂o (6.17)
0 0 F
Yin = Yin − hGi F = Yin − hGi (6.18)
1+T
Yin T Gi F
0
Yin = − − Y in (6.19)
1+T 1+T Gv
x̂˙ = A x̂ + f dˆ + m îz
(6.20)
v̂o = ( q1 − q2 ) X dˆ + q x̂ (6.21)
x̂ = (sI − A)−1 f dˆ + (sI − A)−1 mîz (6.22)
It is left as an exercise to simplify the above to obtain the following result.
0 Zo
Zo = (6.23)
1+T
Closed loop operation is seen to be advantageous for the following reasons.
• Audio Susceptibility is reduced by a factor of (1+T).
• Output Impedance falls by a factor of (1+T).
• Input Admittance falls nearly by a factor of (1+T).
• But one cause of concern is that the input admittance (under closed loop
operation) for dc is negative. This may be seen by the fact that since the
dc output voltage and power is constant in closed loop operation, and the
losses being small, any increase in input voltage will result in a decrease
in the input current.
6.4 Effect of Input Filter on the Converter Performance 187
We had seen the design of the closed loop controller for a duty cycle controlled
switched mode power converter in this section based on a few simple rules
applied to the control gain of the open loop converter. It is also seen that
such a closed loop compensator also improves the audio susceptibility and
the output impedance of the converter. The negative input impedance of the
converter can lead to instability of the converter when it is connected to a
source with finite source impedance. The design guidelines to overcome such
problems are covered in the following sections.
ui2
ZS uo2 Vo
Converter
Vg
set up as per the extra element theorem given in Appendix B, with the second
input and the second output defined as ui2 and uo2 respectively. The duty
ratio input is also shown in Fig. 8 as d.
ui2 ui2
Yn = ; Yd =
uo2 (v̂o = N ull) uo2 (v̂g = 0)
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b (uo2 + v̂g ) + f dˆ
v̂o = (q1 − q2 )X dˆ + q x̂
Yd : v̂g = 0
ui2 = Gi dˆ + Yi uo2
Yn : v̂o = 0 ⇒ dˆ = 0
x̂˙
= A x̂ + b (uo2 + v̂g )
v̂o = q x̂ = 0
ui2 = px̂
x̂˙
= (sI − A)−1 b (uo2 + v̂g )
uo2 = −v̂g
ui2
Yn = = 0
uo2
00 0 1
F = F 0
1 + Z s Yi
2. Effect of Input Admittance
" # " #
00 îg îg 1 + Z s Yn
Yi = =
v̂g (Z = Z ) v̂g (Z = 0) 1 + Zs Yd
s s s
190 Closed Loop Control of Power Converters
ui2
Yn = ;
uo2 îg = 0
ui2
Yd = ;
uo2 v̂g = 0
0
îg = 0 ⇒ Yn = 0 ; v̂g = 0 ⇒ Yd = Yi
00 0 1
Yi = Yi 0
1 + Z s Yi
v̂o = (q1 − q2 )X dˆ + q x̂
Yd : v̂g = 0 ⇒ îz = 0
ui2 = Gi dˆ + Yi uo2
Yn : v̂o = 0 ⇒ dˆ = 0
x̂˙
= A x̂ + b uo2 + m îz
v̂o = q x̂ = 0
6.4 Effect of Input Filter on the Converter Performance 191
x̂˙
= (sI − A)−1 buo2 + (sI − A)−1 mîz
p(sI − A)−1 mF
Define Yx =
Zo
Yn = Y i − Y x
00 1 + Zs (Yi − Yx )
Zo = Z o 0
1 + Z s Yi
4. Effect on Control Voltage
" #Gain " #
00 v̂o v̂o 1 + Z s Yn
Gv = =
dˆ (Zs = Zs ) dˆ (v̂g = 0 ; Zs = 0) 1 + Zs Yd
ui2
Yn = ;
uo2 v̂g = 0 ; v̂o = 0
ui2
Yd = ;
uo2 v̂g = 0 ; îz = 0 ; dˆ = 0
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b (uo2 + v̂g ) + f dˆ
v̂o = (q1 − q2 )X dˆ + q x̂
Yd : v̂g = 0 ; dˆ = 0
Yn : v̂o = 0 ; v̂g = 0 ;
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b uo2 + f dˆ
v̂o = (q1 − q2 )X dˆ + q x̂ = 0
v̂o = (q1 − q2 )X dˆ + q x̂
Yd : v̂g = 0 ; dˆ = 0
Yn : îg = 0 ; v̂g = 0;
6.5 Design Criteria For Selection of Input Filter 193
x̂˙ = A x̂ + b uo2 + f dˆ
ui2 = îg = 0 ; Yn = 0
00 1
Gi = G i
1 + Z s Yi
6. Effect of Input Filter on Converter Functions
00 0 1
F = F 0
1 + Z s Yi
00 0 1
Yi = Y i 0
1 + Z s Yi
00 1 + Zs (Yi − Yx )
Zo = Z o 0
1 + Z s Yi
Zs J
1−
00 U (s)
T = T 0
1 + Z s Yi
00 1
Gi = G i
1 + Z s Yi
Rl L
Rc R
Vg
C
R1 + R||Rc R
− −
L (R + Rc )L
A = A 1 = A2 =
R 1
−
(R + Rc )C (R + Rc )C
1 D
L
0
b1 =
; b1 =
; b =
L
;
0 0 0
0
m1 = m 2 = m = ;
1
C
p1 = 1 0 ; p2 = 0 0 ; p = D 0 ;
R
q1 = q 2 = q = R||Rc ;
R + Rc
Vg
L
f = (A1 − A2 )X + (b1 − b2 )Vg =
;
0
Define
R Rl Rc
α = ;β = ;γ = ;
R + Rc R R
R(β + αγ) α
− −
L L
A =
α α
−
C (RC α α
s + −
1
RC L
(sI−A)−1 =
!
2
s s2 α R(β + αγ)
ωo 1 + +
Qωo ωo2 s+
C L
α(α + β + αγ) ωo α R(β + αγ)
ωo2 = ; = + ;
LC Q RC L
6.5 Design Criteria For Selection of Input Filter 195
s s2
Input Admittance: Define Ds = 1 + +
Qωo ωo2
D 2 (s + α/RC)
Yi = p[sI − A]−1 b =
ωo2 LDs
D 2 α 1 + sCR/α
Yi =
Rωo2 LC Ds
1 + s/ω1
Yi = K 1
s s2
1+ + 2
Qωo ωo
s s2
1+ +
Qωo ωo2
Zi = K ;
1 + s/ω1
K ⇒ 32 dB ; Q ⇒ 7 dB ; ω1 ⇒ 416 Hz ; ωo ⇒ 4072 Hz
The bode plot of is shown in Fig.10. Consider the input filter shown in
40
150
30
100
20 50 Phase in degree
Gain in dB
10 0
0 -50
-100
-10
Gain(dB) vs Frequency -150
Phase vs Fequency
-20
0 1 2 3 4 5
Frequency in log (Hz)
Ls
Rs Cs
Vi Vg
40 40
30 30
20 20
10 10
Gain in dB
0 0
-10 -10
-20 -20
-30 -30
-40 Gain(dB) Zi vs Frequency -40
Gain(dB) Zs vs Fequency
-50 -50
0 1 2 3 4 5
Frequency in log (Hz)
The plot of the source impedance is shown in Fig. 12. It may be seen that
in the the entire frequency range, the inequality Zs /Zi is satisfied ensuring
stability.
There are several controller ICs available in the market. Some of the com-
mercially available controller ICs are given in the following links.
Advanced pulsewidth modulator
Vo
Vi A(s)
Rs
100 µ F
Cs R
0.1 mH
dB
20 dB/decade
H(s)
Vi
Vo ω1 ω2
log10 f
1 + s/2π600
H(s) = −25
s/2/pi600
Design the compensator circuit using the ideal opamp.
4. Is it possible to obtain the gain shown in Fig. (4b) with the circuit shown
in Fig. (4a)
dB H(s)
Vi R1 R2 C −20 dB/decade
Vo 100Hz log10 f
−12 dB
(A) Write down the approximate control transfer function of the con-
verter.
(B) Design a suitable feed back controller for this converter to realise a
bandwidth above 750 Hz and steady-state accuracy above 99%.
6.6 Problem Set 199
8. Fig. 8 shows the block diagram of a closed loop controlled converter. The
converter has a transfer function of
40
G(s) =
s2
!
2s
1+ +
100π (100π)2
The compensator has a transfer function of
s
1+
H(s) = 100π
s
1+
4000π
V* V
H(s) G(s)
V* V
H(s) G(s)
(D) Write down the gain provided by the converter for 300 Hz ripple at
input both in magnitude and phase.
11. A boost converter operating in discontinuous conduction has an open loop
gain of
v̂o 40
= s
ˆ
d 1+
500
For closed loop control a PI controller is chosen. The closed loop band-
width required is 5000 rad/sec. Steady state accuracy required is better
than 1%. Design a suitable compensator and give its normalized transfer
function.
12. The push pull converter shown in Fig.12 is operated in current control
mode. The control transfer function for the converter is as follows.
Vo (s) 15
G(s) = = s
s
Vc (s) 1+ 1+
2π75 2π16000
Vo
Vg
1:1 Vo*
Vc
Modulator H(s)
v̂o (s) R L
= ; Le =
v̂g (s) (1 − D)(R + sLe ) (1 − D)2
Figure 13c gives the same circuit with an additional capacitor with ESR
L L ^v L ^v
o o
^v ^v Rc
g g
R C
R R
(1−D):1
(a) (b) (c)
(C +Rc ) connected across the load. Apply the extra element theorem and
evaluate the corrected audio susceptibility function with the new elements
in the circuit.
14. A switched mode converter has an input (Zi ) impedance given by the
following function.
s s2
1+ +
1000π (200π)2
Zi = 10 s
1+
20π
Figure 14 shows the input filter employed with the source for this con-
R
SMPS
L Converter
Vg C
verter.
(A) Plot the input impedance of the SMPS converter in the form of a
bode plot and mark the salient features of the function Zi .
(B) Apply the appropriate design criteria and evaluate L, C, and R of
the source filter.
Chapter 7
7.1 Introduction
We have seen the control of PWM converters where the duty ratio is controlled
in proportion to a control input Vc . Schematically this method of control
is represented by the schematic shown in Fig. 1. Such a method is called
’duty ratio programmed control’ and is quite popular. A number of special
purpose IC’s (such as 3524, 494, etc) are available for this purpose from a
number of IC manufacturers. Another popular method of control of PWM
dTs Ts
Clock
Vref
R S dTs Ts
Clock
Vc
Vc
from the schematic that there is a local feedback loop. This is on account of
the current through the switch in turn determining the duty ratio. There are
several advantages in such a control scheme.
1. The switch (usually an electronic device) is turned off when its current
reaches a set level. Failure to excessive switch current can be prevented
by simply limiting the maximum value of the control signal Vc . Such a
scheme will protect the entire converter from overloads.
2. Several converters can be operated in parallel without a load-sharing
problem, because all of the power switches receive the same control signal
from the regulator feedback circuit and carry the same maximum current.
3. Current programmed control, since it establishes a constant switch (peak
inductor current) current, effectively eliminates the inductor current as a
state variable of the converter. The overall order of the converter then
reduces by 1, resulting in a simpler gain function.
The stated advantages are shown in Fig.3. There is however an accompanying
disadvantages in the current programmed control.
Vg
Vc
Ic
steady state inductor current waveform shown in Fig. 4. This inductor current
is represented by straight lines in each of the intervals DTs and (1 − D)Ts
and since the switching frequency is very much higher than the system time
constants. The control signal Ic indicating the current threshold is also shown.
Suppose that the inductor current has a rising slope of m1 and falling slope of
m2 ,
Ic
m2 I
δ Io m1
δ I1
DTs (1−D)Ts
m2 D
= (7.1)
m1 1−D
If there is a perturbation, relative to the steady state, of δIo in the inductor
current at the beginning of the cycle, the waveform shows that after one period
the perturbation will propagate to δI1 .
m2
δI1 = − δIo (7.2)
m1
206 Current Programmed Control of DC to DC Converters
Ic
mc
δ Io m1 m2 I
δ I1
DTs (1−D)Ts
previously shows that now a perturbation is carried into δIn after n cycles.
n
m2 − m c
δIn = − δIo (7.4)
m2 + m c
A suitable choice of the ramp slope mc can thus cause this perturbation to die
out even if the duty ratio is more than 0.5. In particular if mc is chosen to be
equal to m2 , the magnitude of the falling current slope, any perturbation in
inductor current will disappear at the end of one cycle. Thus selection of the
stabilising ramp enables inner loop stability and simultaneously provides the
fastest possible transient response as shown in Fig. 6.
Note that for duty ratios less than 0.5, the control is stable. While the
Ic
m1 mc
m2
δ I1 = 0
δ Io
system is stable (for D < 0.5) in the absence of a stabilizing ramp, even
7.3 Determination of Duty Ratio for Current Programmed Control 207
m1 il + m1 dTS /2
dTS (1−d)TS
dTs Vc
i1 + m 1 = − mc d Ts (7.5)
2 Rf
The dc and small signal ac relations are found by setting,
d = D + dˆ ; il = Il + îl ; vc = Vc + v̂c ; m1 = M1 + m̂1 (7.6)
The compensating ramp is constant.
mc = M c (7.7)
208 Current Programmed Control of DC to DC Converters
" #
KR Vc
D= − Il (7.8)
nM1 L Rf
From the above dc and ac relations for d are as follows.
" #
KR v̂ c D
dˆ = − îl − m̂1 (7.9)
nM1 L Rf nM1
2L
K= = conduction parameter of the converter.
RTs
Vo
R= = Output load resistance on the converter.
Io
2Mc
n=1+ = compensation ratio of the current control.
M1
n = 1 for no compensation.
1+D
n= for optimum compensation Mc = M2
1−D
The above results apply to any converter. However, the dependence of the
inductor current ramp m1 on the operating conditions is different for different
converters. The relationship between dˆ and the control input v̂c and other
parameters of the converter for three different basic converters are given in
the following sections.
" #
KR v̂c D
dˆ = − îl − v̂g (7.15)
n(1 − D)Vo Rf n(1 − D)Vo
We may substitute for dˆ in the above equation to get the state equation under
current programmed control.
Rd a
Rd
bD
− −
L L L LRf
x̂˙ =
x̂ + v̂g + v̂c (7.21)
1 1
− 0 0
C RC
Where
KR
Rd =
n(1 − D)
D
a=1−
n(1 − D)
1
b =1−
n(1 − D)
Notice the structure of the system matrix. The converter behaves as if the
inductor in the circuit is L/a, and the parasitic resistance in the circuit is
Rd /a. In other words, the current programming introduces extra damping in
the system so that the system poles are now real.
n may be defined as the degree of compensation. n varies from 1 for no
compensation to (1 + D)/(1 − D) for optimum compensation. Rd may be
defined as the loss-less damping resistance in the system. Rd varies from
KR/(1 − D) for no compensation to KR/(1 + D) for optimum compensation.
K is the conduction parameter of the converter and is usually more than 1 for
CCM. Rd therefore is greater than R. a varies in the range of (1 − 2D)/(1 − D)
for no compensation 1/(1 + D) for full compensation. a is therefore positive
and less than 1.
From the above equations, the transfer functions of the converter may be
readily found out.
Rd a
s+
L L
[sI − A] =
(7.22)
1 1
− s+
C RC
The characteristic polynomial of the converter is
Rd 1 a Rd
2
s +s + + + (7.23)
L RC LC RLC
K
a+
Rd 1 n(1 − D)
s2 + s + + (7.24)
L RC LC
Since a < 1, and K/n(1 − D) > 1, the above polynomial may be approximated
7.4 Transfer Functions 211
as follows
K
Rd 1 n(1 − D)
s2 + s + + (7.25)
L RC LC
Rd 1 Rd Rd 1
s2 + s + + = s+ s+ (7.26)
L RC RLC L RC
The system poles are seen to be real. This is the effect of current program-
ming, which introduces loss-less damping in the system to break the complex
conjugate pole pair of the original system into two real poles. The state con-
trol transfer function and the two output transfer functions may be readily
computed.
1 a
s+ −
Rd
RC L
x̂(s) 1
LRf
= (7.27)
Rd 1 1 Rd
v̂c (s)
s+
s+ s+
L RC C L 0
îl (s) 1
= (7.28)
v̂c (s) sL
Rf 1 +
Rd
v̂o (s) R 1
= (7.29)
v̂c (s) Rf sL
1+ (1 + sCR)
Rd
The current transfer function is a single pole transfer function with a band-
width of ωc = Rd /L.
Rd KR 2L R fs
fc = = = = (7.30)
2πL 2πn(1 − D)L RTs 2πn(1 − D)L πn(1 − D)
When n varies from 1 to (1 + D)/(1 − D), the current loop bandwidth varies
in the range of
fs 2fs
≤ fc ≤ (7.31)
6 3
The minimum value of current loop bandwidth is one sixth of the switching
frequency. This is obtained with optimum ramp compensation. The next
transfer function of importance is
v̂o (s) Kv R
= ; Kv = (7.32)
v̂c (s) sL Rf
1+ (1 + sCR)
Rd
From this transfer function, the feedback compensator design for the control
of the output voltage of the converter may be designed.
212 Current Programmed Control of DC to DC Converters
Rd 1−D
− −
L L
A= ;
1−D Rd 1
− −
C (1 − D)RC RC
a
Rd
− −
L
LRf
; f∗ =
b= ;
−D
Rd
nRC(1 − D)2 RCRf (1 − D)
With similar approximations as carried out for the buck converter, the transfer
functions are
sCR
îl (s) 2 1 +
= 2 (7.34)
v̂c (s) Rf sL
1+ (1 + sCR)
Rd
sL
1−
v̂o (s) (1 − D)R R(1 − D)2
= (7.35)
v̂c (s) Rf sL
1+ (1 + sCR)
Rd
Rd 1−D
− −
L L
A=
;
1−D
Rd 1
− −
C (1 − D)RC RC
aD
Rd
− −
L
LRf
b= ; f∗ = ;
−D 2
DRd
nRC(1 − D) 2
RCRf (1 − D)
7.4 Transfer Functions 213
With similar approximations as carried out for the buck converter, the transfer
functions are
sCR
îl (s) 1+D 1+
= 1+D (7.37)
v̂c (s) Rf sL
1+ (1 + sCR)
Rd
sL
1−
v̂o (s) (1 − D)R R(1 − D)2
= (7.38)
v̂c (s) Rf sL
1+ (1 + sCR)
Rd
The Bode plot of the control transfer functions (programmed current and
(1+D)/R f Buck−Boost
1/Rf Buck Rd /L
dB
Gain
Frequency
output voltage) are shown in Figs. 8 & 9. The following conclusions may be
drawn from the Bode plots.
• The dominant pole of the output transfer function is a function of R and
C (ω1 = 1/RC).
• The output transfer function has a high frequency pole at ωc . This high
frequency pole is the same for all three types of converters, the value of
which depends on the degree of compensation used. Its lower bound is
about 1/6th the switching frequency (fc ≥ fs /6).
• The boost and buck converters exhibit a rhp zero ωz . (The same as found
in duty ratio programmed control). Usually this rhp zero will be between
the two frequencies f1 and fc .
214 Current Programmed Control of DC to DC Converters
(1−D)R/Rf Rd /L
Boost & Buck−Boost
Converter Boost
1/RC
dB
Buck−Boost
Gain
R(1−D)2 /DL
Buck
R(1−D)2 /L
Frequency
Vg = 30V to 60 V ; Vo = 5 V ; L = 40 mH ; C = 1000 µF ;
Rc = 0.02 Ω ; Fs = 50 kHz ; N1 = 25 ; N2 = 11 ; R = 1 Ω ;
7.5 Problem Set 215
Vo
L
N1 Rc R
Vg
N2 C
N1
S
H(s)
Rf Cf
1k
Ri
1k
2.5V
(A) Evaluate the relationship between and i. Assume that the current
controller is ideal. ( = 0)
vo (s)
(B) Evaluate the current control transfer function Gi (s) = (through
vc (s)
the relation between I and vo through the output filter circuit of the
converter).
(C) Sketch the envelope of the transfer function Gi (s) for the full varia-
tions in load R. Mark the salient features of transfer function.
(D) Evaluate the compensator design (Rf , Cf , Ri ) so that the steady state
accuracy is better than 1% and closed loop control bandwidth is
better than 500 Hz.
216 Current Programmed Control of DC to DC Converters
Chapter 8
8.1 Introduction
In the recent past, switched mode power supplies (SMPS) that make use of
resonant circuits for their operation, have emerged as an alternative to the
more conventional types employing pulse width modulation (PWM). Among
the important advantages claimed for this class of SMPS over the PWM type
are the following.
1. Circuit operation is possible at much higher frequencies, giving scope for
reducing the size of reactive components.
2. Because of smooth voltage and current waveforms, noise and interference
are reduced.
3. Stress on the switching devices is also reduced because of smooth volt-
age and current waveforms; zero voltage and zero current switching is
possible.
4. Parasitic circuit elements, such as transformer leakage inductance, can be
taken into account as part of the circuit itself and so need not affect the
circuit performance adversely.
The distinguishing feature of soft switched converters is that they switch
ON and OFF at zero current or zero voltage. In zero current switching, the
switch turns ON from a finite blocking voltage to zero ON state current and
turns OFF at zero ON state current to a finite blocking voltage. The zero
voltage switching is the dual of the zero current switching process. In either
case the switching loss is substantially reduced. The zero current or zero
voltage switching is achieved by switching close to the resonant frequency of
the load (resonant load converter), or by addition of resonant elements to the
switch (resonant switch converters) or by forcing a resonant transition during
the switching process (resonant transition).
SMPS employing resonant converters are not without drawbacks. For ex-
ample, the ratio of the total installed VA of the various components to the
218 Soft Switching Converters
Ig L
Ic R
Vg (j ω ) Vo (j ω )
C IR
1
Vo = V g 2 (8.1)
ω ωL
1− +j
ωo R
1 + jωCR
Ig = V g 2 ! (8.2)
ω ωL
R 1− +j
ωo R
√
where ωo = 1/ LC is the resonant frequency of L and C. The magnitude
response of the circuit at various frequencies can be plotted using Eq. [1].
Some typical characteristics are shown in Fig. 2. The curves have been drawn
for different amplitudes of the source voltage Vg and different values of load
resistance R. Superimposed on the frequency response curves is a dotted
8.2 Resonant Load Converters 219
f
f2b f3b fo f3a f2a f1a
horizontal line called the ”constant Vo line”. From Fig. 2, it becomes clear
that it is possible to maintain a constant amplitude of the output voltage Vo
in the face of variation in the source voltage Vg and the load resistance R -
in other words regulate the output voltage Vo - provided the frequency of the
source is changed correspondingly.
For example consider the portion of the frequency response characteristics
which lie above the resonant frequency fo . When the circuit is operating at
a frequency of f1a , with a high amplitude of Vg and a large value of R, i.e.
light load, the output voltage is equal to the desired value Vo . This operating
point is seen on the characteristics as the point (A). If now the amplitude of
the source voltage decreases to a low value, the output voltage will have an
amplitude corresponding to point (B), if the frequency is maintained at f1a .
Thus the output voltage amplitude decreases with decreasing amplitude of Vg
at constant frequency. However, if now the frequency of the source is changed
to f2a , the operating point moves to (C) where the output voltage is again
the desired value. Thus by changing the frequency, the output voltage can be
regulated against source voltage variations.
Similarly, the output voltage can also be regulated against variations in
loading i.e. changes in the value of R, by changing the source frequency. This
can be understood by considering the operating points (C), (D), and (E).
It is also apparent from Fig. 2 that a similar process of regulation can
be carried out by considering frequencies below resonant frequency, as borne
out by considering the operating points (F) and (G) for example. However, it
can be seen that the direction of change in the source frequency required to
regulate the output voltage is different in the two cases. For frequencies above
resonance, the source frequency has to be decreased i.e. move towards resonant
frequency, in order to correct a tendency of the output voltage to decrease.
On the other hand, for frequencies below resonance, the source frequency has
220 Soft Switching Converters
j ω LIg
Vg
Ig Ig Ic j ω LIg
Ic Vg
IR Vo IR Vo
ω/ωo ≤ 1. The phasor diagrams corresponding to the two situations are shown
in Fig. 3a (operation above resonance) and 3b (operation below resonance)
respectively. The following points can be noticed from the phasor diagrams.
For operation above resonance:
1. The source voltage Vg leads the output voltage Vo by more than 90◦ .
2. The source current Ig always lags the source voltage Vg .
8.2 Resonant Load Converters 221
L Vo
AC
C
usually of the PWM type. Well known configurations are forward, flyback,
and push-pull converters. Output voltage regulation is achieved by control of
pulse-width, while the frequency is usually fixed. However in the light of the
previous discussion, it can be realised that in place of the PWM converter, the
configuration shown in Fig. 5 can be used. Voltage regulation can be achieved
by frequency control of the sine wave.
In practical implementation, instead of a sine wave inverter, a simple square
wave inverter is used, since the resonant circuit itself performs as a low pass
filter, resulting in a capacitor voltage waveform that is a good approximation
of a sine wave.
The circuit of a practical SMPS incorporating the concepts of sine wave
resonant operation is shown in Fig. 6. A half-bridge MOSFET inverter is in-
dicated in Fig. 6. MOSFETs are preferred to bipolar transistors for operation
at frequencies of the order of 100 KHz. An important fact to be highlighted
222 Soft Switching Converters
Transformer
Lr L Vo
Cr C
Lr
T1
D1 L Vo
AC G1
Vg Ig Cr C
G2
with respect the Fig. 6 is that the resonant capacitor C is shown on the sec-
ondary side of the transformer. This implies that the leakage inductance of
the transformer is in series with the resonant inductor and can therefore be
regarded as forming part of the resonant circuit. Therefore the transformer
leakage inductance need not be a troublesome parasitic, causing power loss
and voltage spikes, as is the case with PWM converters. This is a feature of
resonant SMPS circuits that enhances the possibility of high frequency oper-
ation.
From the point of view of the inverter too, operation of the resonant circuit
above and below the resonant frequency gives rise to important differences. As
deduced earlier, operation of the circuit above resonance results in a lagging
phase angle of current with respect to inverter voltage, whereas operation
below resonance is more likely to result in a leading phase angle. Of course
these deductions were based on the source voltage being purely sinusoidal,
whereas the voltage produced by the inverter consists of harmonics, besides
the fundamental. However, conclusions regarding the relative positions of the
zero crossings of the inverter voltage and current are still valid. Therefore the
waveforms of voltage across and current through the inverter switches can be
drawn as shown in Fig. 7.
It can be seen from Fig. 7a that for circuit operation above resonance, the
current drawn from the inverter lags the voltage. This means that whenever a
transistor is switched on, load current actually flows in its antiparallel diode.
8.2 Resonant Load Converters 223
G1 t G1 t
G2 t G2 t
Vg t Vg t
Ig t Ig t
IT1 t IT1 t
ID1 t ID1 t
VT1 t VT1 t
(a) above resonance (b) below resonance
It transfers to the transistor only at the zero crossing of the load current.
Thus the snubber capacitor across the transistor can be discharged smoothly
by the load current itself and the transistor voltage falls to zero well before
the current starts building up. This is referred to as zero voltage switching.
The sequence of events during transfer of current from the bottom to the top
transistor is shown on Fig. 8. A similar sequence of events takes place during
current transfer from the top device to the bottom device. It is clear that
because of the zero voltage switching, the snubber gets discharged by the load
current itself. The fall di/dt of current in the diodes is very small, as the load
inductance is appreciable. Therefore there is no need to have di/dt limiting
reactors. The MOSFETs do not have to discharge the snubber capacitors and
so there is no need for a resistor to limit the discharge current in the snubber
circuit. On the whole then, there is no energy loss in the snubber. A snubber
of the form shown in Fig. 8, consisting of only a capacitor, is therefore referred
to as a lossless snubber.
In contrast, for operation below resonance, the transistors have to carry the
load current as soon as they are turned on and therefore they have to discharge
the snubber too. Further since the diode currents are transferred sharply to
the transistor, there is a need for di/dt limiting inductor. The energy in this
inductor is transferred to the snubber capacitor and subsequently lost. Thus
lossless snubbing is not possible in this case.
224 Soft Switching Converters
V dc /2 D1 Cs1 V dc /2 D1 Cs1
I S1 I S1
S2 S2
V dc /2 D2 Cs2 V dc /2 D2 Cs2
V dc /2 D1 Cs1 V dc /2 D1 Cs1
I S1 I S1
S2 S2
V dc /2 D2 Cs2 V dc /2 D2 Cs2
Vref G1
Driver
VCO G2
V
Transformer
G1
D3 Lf
AC
G2 D4
former, the leakage inductance of the transformer has been made part
of the circuit. As a result, leakage inductance does not contribute to
losses. High operating frequencies are therefore possible. This advantage
is gained at the expense of increased current rating for the resonating C.
2. Because of circuit operation above resonance,
(A) Snubbers are lossless, once again making high frequency operation
possible.
(B) Frequency variation required to regulate the output voltage is quite
small.
3. Because of sinusoidal voltage and current waveforms, less interference is
generated compared to PWM type of SMPS.
4. Since the output rectifiers D3 and D4 operate from sinusoidal voltage
waveforms, ultra-fast recovery diodes are not needed. For example, even
for 200 KHz operation, rectifiers with 50 nS recovery times have been
reported to be adequate.
5. Because of higher operating frequencies and sinusoidal voltage waveforms,
the size of the output filter is less than that for PWM converters.
6. Operation under output short circuit is possible, as current is limited by
the resonating inductor.
ia Vdc /2
vc
+IR
ib i
t
Va −IR
D1 S1 D2 S2
i L i L
vc IR vc IR
Vdc /2 C Vdc /2 C
Mode A Mode B
i L i L
vc IR vc IR
Vdc /2 C Vdc /2 C
Mode C Mode D
for these two modes are shown in Fig. 11. The circuit response in each of
these modes can be obtained by solving the appropriate differential equation.
Mode A:
di 1 t Vdc
Z
L + (i − IR )dt = (8.12)
dt C 0 2
Solving this subject to i(0) = ia , the response of inductor current i and capac-
itor voltage vc may be obtained.
Mode B:
di 1 t Vdc
Z
L + Vco + (i − IR )dt = − (8.13)
dt C 0 2
8.2 Resonant Load Converters 227
Solving this subject to i(0) = ib , and Vco = Va , the response of inductor current
i and capacitor voltage vc may be obtained.
Mode C:
di 1 t Vdc
Z
L + (i + IR )dt = (8.14)
dt C 0 2
Solving this subject to i(0) = −ia , the response of inductor current i and
capacitor voltage vc may be obtained.
Mode D:
di 1 Zt Vdc
L + Vco + (i + IR )dt = − (8.15)
dt C 0 2
Solving this subject to i(0) = −ib , and Vco = −Va , the response of inductor
current i and capacitor voltage vc may be obtained.
It is to be noted once again that Va , ia , and ib are the initial values of
capacitor voltage and inductor current at the discontinuities.
Using Eqs (12) to (15) and the waveforms of Fig. 10, it is possible to obtain
the steady state operating point of the circuit by noting that the values of i
and vc at the beginning and end of the inverter half cycle must be equal in
magnitude and opposite in polarity. From the resulting solution of the circuit,
it is possible to calculate the various quantities of interest such as the peak
and rms values of i, the rms and average currents through the MOSFETs and
diodes etc.
Np :Ns
Ip is L C
Vp vc
Vsec Ic R
the leakage inductance of the transformer also. Vac is the equivalent rms ac
output voltage of the ac equivalent circuit. Vp represents the fundamental
component of the inverter output voltage. At resonance, using Eq. (1), we get
1
Vac = Vsec (8.16)
jωo L/R
Vac
Vsec = jωo L (8.17)
R
Vsec = IR jωo L (8.18)
Given:
Step 1
Secondary Current:
q
|Is | = (Ic2 + IR2 ) (8.21)
8.2 Resonant Load Converters 229
Step 2
Inductor Value: L.
Inductance:
1
L= (8.22)
Cωo2
Step 3
Step 4
Step 5
Primary Current: Ip
Primary Current:
Ns
|Ip | = Is (8.25)
Np
This gives us all the information necessary for deciding on the ratings of the
various components. To illustrate the process, the following design example
may be considered.
Allowing for the drop across the output diode to be 1.5 V, the peak value
of the sinewave across the resonating capacitor : 2(7.85 + 1.5) = 18.7 V
√
Rms value of Vac : 18.7/ 2 = 13.2 V
230 Soft Switching Converters
Minimum primary voltage assuming a bridge rectifier at the input with 230 V
ac input and a half bridge inverter :
√ 4
Vp = 0.9 230 2 √
2π 2
Vp = 132 V
For Example:
Step 1:
Choose C = 1µF
Ic = 2 π (100000)(1)(10−6)13.2 = 8.3 A
√
Is = 8.32 + 92 = 12.2 A
Step 2:
Step 3:
Secondary Voltage:
Step 4:
Step 5:
Primary Current:
12.2
Ip = = 1.3 A
9.3
From the above the voltage and current ratings of the MOSFETs can be de-
cided. In order to get some appreciation of the capacitor value, five different
designs are summarised in Table 1. Study of the Table 1 shows that the VA
VA Ratings
Sl C Ic Is Ls Vsec Np : Ns Ip Lp L C T Total
No. µF A A µH V A µH J J J J
1 0.22 1.8 9.2 11.5 65 2.03 4.5 47 611 24 598 1,223
2 0.47 3.9 9.8 5.4 30.4 4.3 2.3 101 335 51 304 690
3 1 8.3 12.2 2.5 14.1 9.3 1.3 216 269 109 207 585
4 2.2 18.2 20.3 1.2 6.8 19.4 1.1 451 287 240 139 666
5 4.7 39 40 0.5 3 43.4 0.9 1,017 540 514 121 1,175
D1 Vo D1 Vo
S1 L R S1 Lr L R
Df
Vg Df C Vg Cr C
Lr L R is Lr io L R
io
Vg Cr Df C Vg Cr Df C
Vo Vo
is Lr V R io R
c
Vg Cr C Vg Cr Df C
dis
Lr
= Vg (8.26)
dt
Vg t
is = (8.27)
Lr
The circuit operates in this mode until the current is becomes equal to the
load current Io and the diode Df gets reverse biased. This will happen after
an interval T1 given by
Lr Io
T1 = (8.28)
Vg
At the end of T1 , Df stops conducting. The capacitor C discharges through S1
and Lr in a resonant manner. The equivalent circuit under these conditions is
shown in Fig. 15c. Because of the large filter inductor L, the current Io can
be assumed to be constant. The circuit equations are as follows.
dis
Lr = Vg − v c (8.29)
dt
dvc
Cr = is − I o (8.30)
dt
dis 1 Zt
Vg = L r + vc (0) + (is − Io ) dt (8.31)
dt Cr 0
The initial conditions are: is (0) = Io ; vc (0) = 0 ; the solution is
s
Cr
is (t) = Io + Vg Sin ωo (t) (8.32)
Lr
8.3 Resonant Switch Converters 235
s
1
ωo = (8.33)
Lr C r
The capacitor voltage is given by
vc (t) = Vg (1 − Cos (ωo t)) (8.34)
In the above equations the origin for time is taken as the beginning of this
mode. i.e. the instant at which Df stops conducting. In order to achieve ZCS,
the current is (t) given by Eq. [32] must proceed to zero. It can be seen that
the necessary condition for ZCS is that
s
Cr
Io ≤ V g (8.35)
Lr
√
Io Lr
We may define a dimensionless parameter σ = . Then for satisfactory
Vg C r
quasi-resonant operation, σ > 1. If the above condition is satisfied, the
current through the switch will be negative for some duration (after the time
when the switch current passes through zero).
ωo T2 = π + Sin−1 σ (8.36)
ωo T3 = 2π − Sin−1 σ (8.37)
1
is (t) = Io 1 + Sin (ωo t) (8.38)
σ
is Io
T2 T3 T4
T1
2Vg
vc
t
io
t
The wave forms of the current is (t), Io (t), and the voltage vc (t) during this
mode of circuit operation are all shown in Fig. 16. During the time when the
236 Soft Switching Converters
current is negative, it flows through the diode D1 . During this time, if the
gating signal to the switch is removed, it can turn-off at zero voltage and with
very little loss.
vc (T3 ) = Vg (1 − Cos (ωo T3 )) (8.39)
At t = T3 , both D1 and S1 are OFF. The equivalent circuit is shown in Fig.
15d. The voltage vc (t) is now given by
Io t
vc (t) = vc (T3 ) − (8.40)
Cr
This mode comes to an end when vc (t) reaches zero, at time t = T4 as shown
in Fig. 16.
Cr
T4 = vc (T3 ) (8.41)
Io
The circuit reverts back to the mode described in Fig. 15a with the load
current freewheeling in Df and remains in this mode until S1 is turned ON
again. From the above explanation, it becomes clear that the duration for
which the switch S1 is gated ON is rigidly determined by the resonant period
of the LC components. However, the interval between two consecutive turn
ONs of S1 can be varied. Therefore the circuit operates in ”constant ON time,
variable frequency mode”.
√
1 − 1 − σ 2
σ
+ 2π − Sin−1 σ +
2 σ
Gf (σ) = (8.46)
2π
The following Table gives the value of Gf (s) for different values of σ.
Table 8.2: Conversion Factor for Half and Full Wave ZCS Buck Converter
σ 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Gf (σ) 1.00 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 -
Gh (σ) - 3.70 2.12 1.61 1.36 1.22 1.13 1.07 1.03 1.01 1.00
Lf
Vg Cf
R
1:Gf (σ) f s /fo
S1 D1 Vo
Lr io L R
vc
Df
Vg Cr C
is Io
T2 T4
T1
2Vg
vc
t
TS
io
t
Lf
Vg Cf
R
1:Gh (σ) f s /fo
converters where the circuit operating point does not change appreciably. The
dynamic model of the converter may be derived from the equivalent circuit
given in Fig. 20. Notice that the dynamic model will be messy because the
gain Gh (s) is a function of Vg and Io as well besides fs .
The main features of the ZCS SMPS can be listed as follows.
2. While the device voltage rating is only the battery voltage Vg , the peak
repetitive current rating has to be more than twice the output current Io .
3. Zero current switching is possible only if the load current Io does not
exceed the value Vg (Cr /Lr ).
Lf Df Vo Lf Lr Df Vo
vc
S1 S1
Vg Cf R Vg Cr Cf R
(a) (b)
Assume that to start with the switch S1 is ON and carrying the inductor
current Ig . The equivalent circuit is shown in Fig. 22a. At t = 0, S1 is turned
OFF. Because of the presence of Cr , the voltage across S1 cannot increase
instantaneously. The inductor current Ig is diverted to the capacitor Cr . The
equivalent circuit is shown in Fig. 22b. The capacitor voltage is described by
Ig
vc (t) = t (8.49)
Cr
The capacitor charges linearly until vc = Vo at time t = T1 given by
C r Vo
T1 = (8.50)
Ig
At this instant, the free wheeling diode Df becomes forward biased. The
Lf Vo Lf vc Vo
S1
Vg Cf Vg Cr Cf
R R
(a) (b)
Ig Lf Vo Ig Lf Lf Vo
vc
Vg Vg Cr
(c) (d)
s " #
Lr 1
vc (t) = Vo + Ig Sin(ωo t) ωo = √ (8.55)
Cr 2π Lr Cr
il (t) = Ig (1 − Cos(ωo t)) (8.56)
To achieve zero voltage switching, the capacitor voltage has to go down to zero
√ !
Vo C r
following resonance. Alternatively, the dimensionless parameter σ σ = √
Ig Lr
has to be less than 1.
s s
Lr Vo Lr
Vo ≤ I g ; σ= ≤1 (8.57)
Cr Ig Cr
The time T2 when the capacitor voltage reaches zero following resonance is
obtained from,
ωo (T2 ) = π + Sin−1 (σ) (8.58)
il (T2 ) = Ig (1 − Cos(ωo T2 )) (8.59)
At t = T2 , the capacitor voltage reaches zero, and the diode across the switch
gets forward biased. Subsequently the current in the resonant inductor linearly
falls to zero. The equivalent circuit is shown in Fig. 22d. Current il is given
by
Vo
il (t) = il (T2 ) − t (8.60)
Lr
Current il becomes zero at T3 , given by
Lr
T3 = il (T2 ) (8.61)
Vo
It is to be noted that during this mode of operation, the voltage across S1
is zero as D1 is conducting. If the gating signal is applied to S1 now, it will
turn-on at zero voltage. At T3 , diode Df gets reverse biased and the circuit
reverts back to the initial mode given in Fig. 22a.
From the above it is clear that for ZVS operation, the duration for which the
switch is OFF is decided rigidly by the period of resonance of the LC compo-
nents. The interval between consecutive turn-offs of S1 can be varied, keeping
the OFF time constant, to achieve output voltage regulation. Therefore the
circuit operates in the ”constant OFF time variable frequency mode”
One important aspect to be noted is that S1 should be turned ON again
before the current is turns positive following resonance if ZVS is to be achieved,
as otherwise the capacitor will once again charge in the positive direction.
However S1 cannot be turned on before vc (t) becomes zero either (Fig. 25).
Therefore deciding the instant of turn-on of S1 becomes critical. This problem
may be overcome by using the fullwave version of the circuit given in Fig. 23.
242 Soft Switching Converters
Lf Vo
vc Lr Df R
Vg S1 Cr Cf
Lf Cf
Vg
R
Conversion Factor
Just as we did for the buck ZCS converter, considering that the converter is
Vo
lossless, the conversion factor is evaluated.
Vg
Vo 1
Mh = = (8.62)
Vg Gh (σ)fs /fo
√
σ 1− 1 + σ2
+ π + Sin−1 σ +
2 σ
Gh (σ) = (8.63)
2π
The fullwave version of the boost quasi-resonant ZVS circuit is shown in Fig.
23. The equivalent circuit of the converter is given in Fig. 24. The circuit
waveforms are given in Figs 25 and 26. The conversion factor for the fullwave
version is
Vo 1
Mf = = (8.64)
Vg Gf (σ)fs /fo
√
1 + 1 + σ 2
σ
+ 2π − Sin−1 σ +
2 σ
Gf (σ) = (8.65)
2π
The main features of the ZVS buck converter can therefore be summarised as
follows.
8.3 Resonant Switch Converters 243
vc(t)
Vo
T2 T4
T1
il (t) Ig
v(t) TS
t
is (t)
t
vc(t)
Vo
T2 T3
T1
il (t) Ig
v(t) TS
t
1. Device turn-on and turn-off happen at zero voltage. The ZVS technique
is capable of being applied at much higher frequencies than ZCS. Device
244 Soft Switching Converters
C1 S1 D1
IL
VDC
A B
C2 S2 D2
S3 , S2 t
S3 S1 D1 S1 , S4 t
IL
VDC VA t
B
A VB t
S2 S4 D2
VAB t
With the duty ratio fixed at 50%, output regulation is not possible. There-
fore, alternate methods have to be employed to achieve regulation. For the
full-bridge topology, phase modulation, explained with the help of Fig. 28, is
one such alternative. Figure 28 shows the simplified schematic of the phase-
modulated full-bridge converter. Each of the four devices (S1 to S4 ) is operated
at 50% duty-ratio. Hence the waveforms at points A and B are square-waves
246 Soft Switching Converters
Figure 29 shows the schematic of PMC used for analysis and simulation. As
may be seen, the circuit includes the parasitic elements like the output ca-
pacitance (C1 , C2 , C3 , and C4 )of the MOSFET and the magnetising (Lm )
and leakage inductances (LLK ) of the transformer. Zero voltage switching
demands that, before a MOSFET is switched on, its output capacitance be
completely discharged. This discharge is accomplished by the energy stored
in the magnetising and the leakage inductances. Therefore, these parameters
are crucial from the ZVS viewpoint and have to be considered in the analysis.
For the purpose of analysis, a complete cycle of operation is divided into
RECTIFIER
D3 C1 im Dp L Vo
S3 S1 irefl IL
C3 D1 LLK
VDC Vpri C R
n:1:1
SOURCE INVERTER TRANSFORMER
eight distinct intervals for the inverter and four intervals for the secondary
side rectifiers. The inverter and rectifier intervals are interdependent. The
transformer primary currents are determined by the secondary side diode cur-
rents and the diode currents in turn depend on the magnitude and polarity of
the inverter voltages. However, for ease of analysis they are considered sep-
arately. The inverter intervals are determined by the switching sequence of
the devices. Figure 30 shows the inverter in interval 1, showing the devices
conducting, and the current path. During this interval the diagonal switches
S3 and S4 conduct, transferring power to the load. This interval ends when
8.4 Resonant Transition Phase Modulated Converters 247
D3 im Dp L Vo
S3 S1 irefl IL
C3 LLK
VDC Vpri C R
D4 LLK
S4 Lm
C4 Dn
n:1:1
IL /n IL L+LLK Io
Vpri
Vpri /n Co
Ipri
D3 im Dp L Vo
S3 S1 irefl IL
C3 LLK
VDC Vpri C R
D4 LLK
S4 Lm
C4 Dn
n:1:1
IL /n IL L+LLK Io
C1
Vpri
VDC Vpri /n Co
C4
equations derived. Table 3 lists the start and end of each interval, and the
equations valid in them.
8.4 Resonant Transition Phase Modulated Converters 249
only when the transformer voltage changes polarity and gets forward biased.
From Fig. 31, the condition for Dn to be forward biased, can be derived as
d
− Vsec ≥ Vsec − LLk iDp (8.74)
dt
During this interval 2, known as the overlap interval, both Dp as well as Dn
conduct, resulting in zero voltage across the output filter. The current through
Dp decreases at the rate given by,
d Vsec
iDp = (8.75)
dt LLk
and when it reaches zero, the next interval begins where Dn alone conducts.
The equations valid in each of the four rectifier intervals are listed in Table 4.
The next section outlines the design strategy for achieving ZVS.
load current begins to reverse direction, the rate of reversal being determined
by the leakage inductance. Once the load current reverses direction, it op-
poses the magnetising current in the discharge of the MOSFET capacitance.
Hence the left-leg transition is more critical from the ZVS standpoint. The
design equations are therefore, derived to achieve ZVS in this transition, which
automatically ensures ZVS for the other transition too.
Apart from the magnetising and leakage inductances, the other parameter
which affects ZVS, is the dead time [Tdelay ] allowed between the turn-off of a
MOSFET and the subsequent turn-on of the other MOSFET in the same arm.
All these parameters along with their qualitative effects on ZVS, are given in
Table 5.
From the equations valid for the fourth inverter interval (left-leg transition
which is the crucial one for ZVS) the following expression can be derived, for
the voltage VC2 across the MOSFET to be turned on.
s
Leq
VC2 = VDC − (im + iref l ) sin ωt (8.76)
2C
where,
1
ω=q
2CLeq
8.4 Resonant Transition Phase Modulated Converters 251
The above expression gives the following two conditions to achieve ZVS at
any given load. s
Leq
(im + iref l ) ≥ VDC (8.77)
2C
πq
TDelay = 2CLeq (8.78)
2
The first condition ensures that the peak of the sinusoidal component of Eq.
(76) is atleast equal to VDC , so that VC2 eventually reaches zero. The second
condition ensures that the MOSFET is switched on when VC2 is zero. Hence
the design strategy is to,
1. Select Tdelay considering the switching frequency and the MOSFET char-
acteristics.
2. Calculate the value of LLk from Eq. (78), with the above value of TDelay .
3. With the above value of LLk , calculate from Eq. (77), the peak magnetis-
ing current required at any load down to which ZVS is required.
The full system may be numerically simulated with the help of equations listed
in Tables 3 and 4, and using the above values for delay time, magnetising
current and leakage inductance as initial estimates. From repeated simulation
runs, more satisfactory design values for all the parameters may be found.
nologies which are evolving in the area of soft switching converters, are the
resonant load, resonant switch and the resonant transition converters. The
252 Soft Switching Converters
first two were briefly reviewed and the third was covered in detail. With its
ZVS characteristics and constant-frequency control, the phase-modulated full-
bridge converter is well suited for high-voltage and high-power applications.
Results obtained on a 560W/250kHz off line converter, and a 30W/500kHz dc
to dc converter are presented to substantiate this claim.
The advantages of PMC are more striking in applications where the range
of input variation is not too wide. One such important application area is in
high-power converters with front end powerfactor control [PFC] scheme.
The following links give the data sheets on a few commercially available
ICs suitable for soft switching converters.
Phase modulated converter controller
DR
CR
CR Io
Vo
S CA LR L
Load
SA
Vg D C R
Figure 8.32: Hard Switching and Active Clamped ZVS Buck Converter
Vg
Io
CR
I*
CA LR
SA
Vg D
Interval T1
S LR
i(t)
Io
Vg D
The initial condition on the current is i(0) = −I ∗ ; The switch current (in-
ductor LR current) i(t) in interval T1 is given by
Vg
i(t) = −I ∗ + t (8.80)
LR
i(T1 ) = Io (8.81)
I + I∗
T1 = LR (8.82)
Vg
We define a normalised current IN . This will be useful in establishing the
performance parameters of the converter later. Normalised current is defined
in terms of pole current Io , throw voltage Vg , and the switching period Ts .
LR Io
IN = (8.83)
Vg Ts
Interval T2
Io
CR
S LR
Vg
diode D goes off. The initial current on the resonant inductor LR is Io . The
initial voltage on the resonant capacitor CR is Vg . During this interval, the
capacitor loses its voltage from Vg to 0. At the end of this interval, the diode
across CR starts conducting. The resonant inductor current i(t), the resonant
capacitor voltage v(t) during this interval, the resonant capacitor voltage at
the end of this interval v(T2 ), and the duration of this interval T2 are all given
by the following equations.
s
CR t
i(t) = Io + Vg sin q (8.84)
LR L R CR
t
v(t) = Vg cos q (8.85)
L R CR
v(T2 ) = 0 (8.86)
π q
T2 = L R CR (8.87)
2
Interval T3
DR Io
i(t)
S LR
Vg D
Figure 36 shows the equivalent circuit of the converter during the interval
T3 . During
s this interval the initial current in the resonant inductor LR is
CR
Io + V g .
LR
di
LR = 0 (8.88)
dt
s
CR
i(t) = Io + Vg (8.89)
LR
T1 + T2 + T3 = DTs (8.90)
256 Soft Switching Converters
This interval ends at the end of the on time DTs . The inductor current during
this interval stays constant as given in Eq. [89]. At the end of this interval
the switch S is turned off.
Interval T4
Io
DR i(t)
S CA LR
VC
Vg
Interval T5
Io
CR i(t)
S CA LR
SA
Vg
9
Figure 8.38: The Equivalent Circuit of the Converter in Interval T5
The initial capacitor CR voltage is 0. The inductor (LR ) current i(t), and the
capacitor (CR ) voltage v(t) are as follows.
s
CR t
i(t) = Io − (Vg + VC ) sin q (8.95)
LR LR C R
t
v(t) = (Vg + VC ) 1 − cos q (8.96)
L R CR
The end of this interval is when the capacitor voltage v(t) reached Vg .
q β
T5 = LR CR cos−1 (8.97)
1+β
The inductor current I(T5 ) is given by
s
CR
I(T5 ) = Io − Vg (1 + β) (8.98)
LR
At the end of interval T5 , the capacitor is charged to Vg , and the free-wheeling
diode starts conducting.
Interval T6
Io
CR
LR
S CA
i(t)
SA
Vg D
This interval ends after T6 when the switching period Ts ends. At the end of
interval T6 , the inductor current ramps down to kI(T5 ). Immediatly following
T6 , the next interval starts, which is the same as the first interval T1 .
kI(T5 ) = −I ∗ (8.101)
Figure 40 shows the steady state current of the resonant inductor LR . Notice
the six sub-periods T1 to T6 explained above.
Io
i(t) I(T 5 )
t
T3 T6 kI(T5 )
T1 T2 T4 T5
Figure 41 shows the steady state current of the clamp capacitor CA . The
sub-periods of relevance are T4 to T6 explained above.
Evaluation of β and k
Io
iC (t) I(T 5 )
t
T3 T6 kI(T5 )
T1 T2 T4 T5
! (k + 1)Ts
fS T6
β = A IN − ; A = ! (8.108)
2πfR (k + 1)Ts fS
1+
T6 2πfR
Design Methodology
Stsrting with an initial value of VC , and kI(T5 ), one may compute sequentially
through the six intervals to obtain a steady state solution. A spreadsheet de-
sign may conveniently be used. The first guess for the initial current kI(T5 )
260 Soft Switching Converters
and VC may be entered and re-entered from the computed values till conver-
gence is obtained. The number of iterations in most cases is not more than 3.
The design constraints are the following.
1. fR >> fS . The resonant frequency of the circuit elements LR and CR
is chosen much greater than the switching frequency.
s
CR
2. V > Imin
LR
Io
i(t) I(T 5 )
t
T3 T6 kI(T5 )
T1 T2 T4 T5
Vg
VP
t
DTS
Figure 8.42: Steady State Pole Voltage of the Active Clamp Buck Converter
Equation [111] may be represented by the equivalent circuit shown in Fig. 43.
L Rd Vo
Vg
C
Ig Vo
L LR D S R
A
CR C
Vg DR CA Load
S CR
(a)
DR
CR
CR
(b)
S CA LR D Vo
Load
SA L
I
Vg C R
Figure 8.44: Active Clamp (a) Boost and (b) Buck-Boost Converters
Figures 44 shows the active-clamp versions of the (a) non-isolated boost and
(b) non-isolated buck-boost converters. The equivalent circuits of the various
active clamp converters are shown in Fig. 45. Table 7 gives the equivalent
circuit parameters.
ZVS converters with active clamp retain the simple features of the hard
switched counterparts. In addition, ZVS converters with active clamp ex-
hibit loss-less damping in their dynamic performance. As a result closed loop
compensators for this family of converters are easier to design. More details
including the dynamic model and transfer functions of the ZVS converters
262 Soft Switching Converters
(1−d):1
L Rd Vo
Vg
C
(a)
1:d (1−d):1
L Rd Vo
Vg
C
(b)
(1−d):1 1:d
L1 Vo
Rd1 L2 Rd2
Vg
C
(c)
Converter V I Rd M
(1 + k)LR
Buck Vg Io D − (1 + k)IN
Ts
(1 + k)LR 1
Boost Vo Ig
Ts (1 − D) + (1 + k)IN
(1 + k)LR D − (1 + k)IN
Buck-Boost V g + Vo IL
Ts (1 − D) + (1 + k)IN
(1 + k)LR D − (1 + k)IN
Cuk V g + Vo Ig + I o
(1 − D)Ts (1 − D) + (1 + k)IN
(1 + k)LR
DTs
8.6 Problem Set 263
S1 L 12 V @ 1 to 4 A
C TS = 50 microsecond
Df L = 1.7 millihenry
28 V R
C = 10 microfarad
I LR D S2 D2
VC
D1 CR S1 V
Vg
CR C
i(LR)
I
−I*
0 T1 T2 T3 T4 T5 T6
(A) Sketch the equivalent circuit determining the inductor current in each
of the intervals 0 to T1 , T1 to T2 , T2 to T3 , T3 to T4 , T4 to T5 , and T5
to T6 .
(B) Write down the equations relating the rate of change of inductor
current di(LR )/dt in the intervals 0 to T1 , T2 to T3 , and T5 to T6
Chapter 9
This chapter introduces a family of off-line power supplies which draw unity
power factor sinusoidal current from the ac mains. Figure 1 shows the front
end of off-line rectifiers with capacitive and inductive filter respectively. Fig-
i(t) i(t)
i(t) i(t)
t t
ure 2 shows the input current in such front-end rectifiers. Poor power factor,
High crest factor, and harmonic distorion are the undesirable features typical
of these converters. It is seen that the inpur current in such rectifiers is non-
sinusoidal with substantial harmonic content. The current concern on power
quality in distribution end addresses this issue. Accordingly several recom-
mendations and specifications are being laid down to ensure sinusoidal input
current in off-line power supplies. IEC 555 and IEEE 519 are some of these
recommendations.
266 Unity Power Factor Rectifiers
Almost all UPF rectifiers adopt the boost converter as the active power stage.
Figure 3 shows the power stage of such a circuit. The switch S is controlled at
i(t)
L S Vo
Vin(t) S C R
high switching frequency with pulse width modulation (PWM). The constraint
on the output voltage for proper control is as follows.
The current trend is to design the off-line converters suitable for universal
input. Universal input covers 110 V ac, 60 Hz, as well as 230 V ac, 50 Hz.
Such converters are made suitable for ac inputs ranging from 90V ac to 270
V ac. In such a case, the dc output voltage is designed to be higher than the
peak of the highest input voltage. A typical and popular output voltage is 400
V dc.
The switch modulation in such a case is made such that the average current
flowing through the inductor L is a rectified sinusoid. The rectified sinusoidal
current reference is derived from the rectified voltage of the input diode rec-
tifier. The concept is illustrated in Fig. 4. The current control is obtained
with a current controller shown as Hi (s). It is usual to employ a simple PI
controller for this purpose. It is usual that the output voltage is required to
be regulated. Therefore it is customary that an outer voltage controller is
employed around the current controller as shown in Fig. 5. The block shown
as Hv (s) is the voltage controller. The voltage controller output is multiplied
with the rectified sinusoid to obtain the desired Iref . The voltage controller is
also usually a PI controller.
9.2 Average Current Mode Control 267
i(t)
L S Vo
Vin(t) S C R
Iref |i(t)|
k
t Hi (s)
Iref
i(t)
L S Vo
Vin(t) S C R
k |i(t)|
t Iref
Hi (s)
Vref
Hv (s)
i(t) L S Vo
Vin(t) S C R
|i(t)|
LPF k
t Hi (s)
Iref V Vref
a
Hv (s)
L S Vo
Vin(t) v(t) d
S C R
dTS
is (t) dt
0
d TS A t 1− t
TS TS
k TS (k+1) T S
[10]. This method of obtaining upf operation of the boost converter is named
the non-linear carrier control based resistor emulation.
Vo (1 − d)
ig (av) = (9.13)
Re
t
In order to obtain a suitable method of modulation, d may be replaced by ,
Ts
Vo t
ig (av) = 1 − (9.14)
Re Ts
Figure 9 shows a modulation method to evaluate the duty ratio to satisfy
Eq. [14]. This method of obtaining upf operation of the boost converter is
named the scalar controlled resistor emulation. This method is suitable for
polyphase rectifiers as well. Additional features of scalar control is given
(Scalar Controlled Resistor Emulator) in this link. A predictive switching
modulator for current mode control of high power factor boost rectifier is
available (Linear Predictive Resistor Emulator) at this link.
ig Vo t
Re 1 − T S
d TS
k TS (k+1) T S
Vo
i(t)
d(t) C
L vp(t) 0
vi (t)
C
−Vo
dc.
Vo Vo Vo
vp (t) = d(t) − [1 − d(t)] = [1 − 2d(t)] (9.15)
2 2 2
Vo
vi (t) = i(t) Re ≈ vp (t) = [1 − 2d(t)] (9.16)
2
Vo
i(t) = [1 − 2d(t)] (9.17)
2 Re
t
d may be replaced by , in order to obtain a suitable method of modulation.
Ts
Vo t
i(t) = [1 − 2 ] (9.18)
2 Re Ts
Equation [18] may be graphically put in the form of a carrier based modulation
scheme as shown in Fig. 11. Scalar control applied to single phase upf
Vo ig
1− 2t
2Re TS
t
d TS
k TS (k+1) T S
Figure 9.11: Scalar Control Carrier Scheme for Single Phase UPF Rectifier
i(t) Vo
L
a
L vp(t)
vi (t) b dc(t)
L da(t) db(t) C
c
Vdc
L (1−d)
Vi
Vac
Iac d
0
Vdc
(A) Prove that Iac = Vi /k, where Vi is the fundamental component of the
voltage at the pole of the switch.
(B) Sketch the phasor diagram of Vac , Vi , and Iac .
(C) For the given operating condition evaluate k.
(D) Evaluate the minimum (dmin ) and maximum (dmax ) value of duty
ratio in a cycle of the fundamental.
Appendix A
A.1 Introduction
In Power Electronic Systems, besides power electronic devices, circuits and
converters, the other major area of importance is the control. In the chap-
ters covering the various converters, the operation and modeling of different
converters were covered. For achieving the desirable working objectives, the
converters are invariably controlled in closed loop. Classical and modern con-
trol theory is applied towards this objective. The dynamic transfer functions
of the various power converters are the starting point in the design of closed
loop controllers. In this Chapter, we will review the basics of control theory
to the extent it is applicable for our objective of closed loop control of power
converters.
A.1.1 System
The block f shown in Fig. A.1 qualifies as a system, if it responds (produces
an output function y) in an understandable and predictable manner for all
input functions u. System f links the input and output in an understandable
and predictable manner. The system may be defined through a mathematical
function operating on the input u(t), to provide the output y(t). Or the system
may be defined through a reference table listing all possible inputs and the
respective outputs.
u y
f
y = f (u) (A.1)
274 Review of Control Theory
• Superposition:
F or f (u1 ) = y1 & f (u2 ) = y2 ⇒ f (u1 + u2 ) = y1 + y2 (A.4)
i R1
Vi R2 Vo
u = vi ; y = v 0 (A.7)
i R
C
Vi Vo
vi = vo + iR (A.8)
dvo
i=C (A.9)
dt
dvo
vi = vo + RC (A.10)
dt
• The system equation is a differential equation; it is a dynamic system.
276 Review of Control Theory
According to the above, the solution is not unique on account of the presence of
the arbitrary constant A in the solution. To uniquely determine vo (t), the value
of A must be determined. To determine A, vo at t = 0 (initial condition) or at
any finite time (boundary condition) is required to be known. For example, if
vo (0) = V , then
t t
− −
vo (t) = vi 1 − e RC + V e RC (A.12)
The variable s in the Laplace transform is the transformed variable. Its phys-
ical significance is seen later. When we apply the Laplace transform to the
system Eq.(A.13), the transformed equation is
Z ∞ Z ∞ Z ∞
st st
vi (t)e dt = vo (t)e dt + RC est dvo (t) (A.16)
0 0 0
dvo
Vi (s) = Vo (s) + RCL (A.17)
dt
Vi (s) = Vo (s) + RC sVo (s) − RCvo (0) (A.18)
• The above equation describes the same system in the transformed variable
s.
• In the new transformed system, the defining equation is algebraic.
• The system ”state” automatically pops out in the process.
i R
C
Vi 0 Vo Φ
• The roots ωz1 , ωp1 , etc are real or complex. When complex, these roots
occur in conjugate pairs, since the co-efficient of N(s) and D(s) are real.
280 Review of Control Theory
• ωz1 , ωz2 etc (values of s for which G(s) = 0) are called the zeroes of the
transfer function.
• ωp1 , ωp2 etc (values of s for which G(s) = ∞) are called the poles of the
transfer function.
• Complex poles or zeroes, when occur, are in conjugate pairs. Then they
may be combined into a single second order pair of poles and zeroes.
Consider
ωz1 = σ + jω & ωz2 = σ − jω (A.32)
2
s s s s
1+ 1+ =1+ + 2 (A.33)
σ + jω σ − jω Qωz ωz
σ2 + ω2
ωz2 = σ 2 + ω 2 ; Qωz = (A.34)
2σ
• The transfer function may be written as a ratio of polynomials in s. The
numerator and the denominator are products of first order (real poles or
zeroes) or second order (complex poles or zeroes) terms.
s s s2
1+ 1+ + 2 ...
ωz1 Qωzo ωzo
G(s) = K (A.35)
s s s2
1+ 1+ + 2 ...
ωp1 Qωpo ωpo
Simple Pole:
1
G(s) = s (A.36)
1+
ωp
A.2 Laplace Transformation 281
Magnitude Gain:
1
G(jω) = 20 log10 ω (A.37)
1+j
ωp
v
u 1
= 20 log10 u (A.38)
u
2
t1 + ω
u
ωp2
The function given in Eq.(38) is as such inconvenient. We break it into two
regions and apply appropriate approximations.
ω2 ω2 ω
1+ 2
≈ 1 f or 2
<< 1 ⇒ ≤ 1 (A.39)
ωp ωp ωp
ω2 ω2 ω2 ω
1+ 2
≈ 2
f or 2
>> 1 ⇒ ≥ 1 (A.40)
ωp ωp ωp ωp
The aymptotic plots are given by the following expressions.
ω
20 log10 (1) = 0 f or ≤ 1
ωp
G(jω) = ω ω (A.41)
20 log10 ( ) f or ≥ 1
ωp ωp
ω
= 0 dB f or ≤ 1
ωp
G(jω) = ω (A.42)
= 20 (dB/decade) Slope f or
≥ 1
ωp
The error caused by this approximation in gain is as given in Table.1
• The maximum error introduced by the approximation is 3dB.
• The gain is 0 dB for ω ≤ ωp .
• The gain monotonically falls at the rate of 20 dB/decade of frequency
change in the region ω ≥ ωp .
282 Review of Control Theory
Phase Gain
ω
−1
φ(jω) = tan (A.43)
ωp
Just as we did for magnitude gain, the range of frequency is split into different
regions.
ω ω
tan−1 0 = 0 f or << 1 ⇒ < 0.1
ωp ωp
φ(jω) = ω ω (A.44)
tan−1 ∞ = −90◦ f or >> 1 ⇒ > 10
ωp ωp
0◦ f or ω ≤ 0.1ωp
φ(jω) = 45◦ /decade 0.1ωp ≤ ω ≤ 10ωp (A.45)
−90◦ f or ω ≥ 10ω
p
0 dB
dB −20dB/decade
−20 dB 0
−45 /decade
−40 dB −45
Φ
−60 dB −90
−80 dB
80 dB
60 dB +90
+45 /decade Φ +20dB/decade
40 dB +45
dB
20 dB 0
ωz
0 dB
Magnitude Gain
Phase Gain
0◦ f or ω ≤ ω1
φ(jω) = −90◦ ω = ωo (A.48)
−180◦ f or ω ≥ ω
2
+20 dB 0
Φ 20 log Q
0 dB dB
−20 dB −90
−40dB/decade
−40 dB
−60 dB ω1 ω2
−180
that the output is fully under our control and independent of the parameters
of the system or the operating point - or independent of the uncertainties
of the system parameters. Such an ideal situation is not obtainable in the
open loop control shown above. Closed loop control achieves this objective
to a considerable extent. The objective of closed loop control is to make the
overall system behaviour less sensitive to the system parameters. Consider
the closed loop system shown in Fig. 9. Suppose that G(s) even though not
completely known, is very large.
Y
G(s) = ∞ ⇒= ≈0 (A.50)
G
1
= U − HY ≈ 0 ⇒ Y = U (A.51)
H
The output Y is the ideal gain (1/H) times the input U. H(s) is the feedback
controller under the control of the designer. Therefore the gain of the ideal
A.3 Principles of Closed Loop Control of Linear Systems 285
u(s) y(s)
G(s) =
H(s)
u(s) ε y(s)
G(s)
H(s)
ui1 uo1
ui2 uo2
ui1 uo1
We now define two driving point functions Zd and Zn . Zd is the driving point
function of port 2 for zero input at port 1. Zn is the driving point function of
port 2 for null output at port 1. These are given by the following expressions.
uo2
Zd = = B2 (B.7)
ui2 ui1 = 0
uo2 A1 B2 − A 2 B1
Zn = = (B.8)
ui2 uo1 = 0 A1
Consider now a single input single output system (the power converter) as
ui1 uo1
ui2
uo2 Z
shown in Fig. 2. Define one of the elements in the network as an extra element
Z as shown in Fig. 3. The current through the element Z is defined as the
input ui2 and the voltage across Z is defined as the output uo2 . The system
defining equations are
uo1 = A1 ui1 + A2 ui2 (B.9)
uo2 = B1 ui1 + B2 ui2 (B.10)
uo2
ui2 = − (B.11)
Z
" #
uo2 B2
uo2 = B1 ui1 − B2 ⇒ uo2 1 + = B1 ui1 (B.12)
Z Z
B1
uo2 = ui1 " # (B.13)
B2
1 +
Z
uo2 A2 B1
uo1 = A1 ui1 − A2 = A1 ui1 − ui1 (B.14)
Z B2 + Z
B.1 Concept of Double Injection and Extra Element Theorem 289
" # " #
A1 B2 − A 2 B1 Zn
A1 1 + 1+
A1 Z Z
uo1 = ui1 = ui1 A1 " (B.15)
B2
#
Zd
1+ 1+
Z Z
" # " #
Zn Zn
" # 1+ " # 1+
uo1 Z uo1 Z
= A1 " # = " # (B.16)
ui1 Z
Zd ui1 Z=∞ Zd
1+ 1+
Z Z
" #
Zn
" # " # 1+
Z
A = A " # (B.17)
Z=Z Z=∞ 1 + d
Z
Z
Equation 17 is the statement of the extra element theorem. Any network
function A in the presence of the element Z is expressed in terms of the
network fuction A in the absence of the function (Z = ∞) and a correction
factor consisting of a bilinear function of Z. The correction factor is a function
of the extra element introduced Z and two driving point functions Zd and Zn
at the point of introduction of the extra element. These two driving point
impedances are as defined in Eq. [7] and [8].
There is an alternate formulation of the same problem. Define the voltage
of the element Z as ui2 and the current through the element as uo2 as shown
in Fig. 4. This is a dual formulation of the extra element theorem.
ui1 uo1
uo2
ui2 Z
A2 ZB1
uo1 = A1 ui1 − A2 uo2 Z = A1 ui1 − ui1 (B.23)
1 + B2 Z
" #
[A1 B2 − A2 B1 ]Z
A1 1 +
A1
uo1 = ui1 (B.24)
1 + B2 Z
" #
Z
" # " # 1+
uo1 uo1 Zn
= " # (B.25)
ui1 (Z=Z)
ui1 (u ) Z
i2=0 1+
Zd
" # " #
Z Zn
" # " # 1+ " # 1+
Zn Z
A = A " # = A " # (B.26)
(Z=Z) (Z=0)
Z (Z=∞)
Zd
1+ 1+
Zd Z
From the above dual relationship, it is also seen that,
" # " #
Zn
A = A (B.27)
(Z=0)
Z
(Z=∞) d
R1 Vo
C
RL
Vi R2
R1 Vo R1 Vo
C C
Zo Z in
RL RL
Vi R2 R2
Consider the circuit shown in Fig. 5. By conventional method one can find
the transfer function to be
Vo RL 1 + sCR2
A = = !! (B.28)
Vin R1 + R L
1 + sC R2 + R1 ||RL
RL 1 + sCR2
A = !! (B.33)
R1 + R L
1 + sC R2 + R1 ||RL
Zd = DrivingP ointImpedancewith(io = 0) = R2 + RL
Vcc
R1 RL
Vo
RS
Vi R2
R
C
0
The equivalent circuit of the amplifier is shown in Fig. 7. Notice that the
equivalent circuit is in the absence of C in the circuit. Extra element theorem
is applied to correct for the presence of C. Figures 8 and 9 show the evaluation
of the driving point impedances Zd and Zn .
RS iB B C Vo
E β iB
Vi
RB R RL
C
0
RB = R1 ||R2 (B.38)
B.2 Some Application Examples 293
RS iB B C Vo
E β iB
RB R Zd RL
RS iB B C Vo = 0
E β iB
Vi
RB R Zn RL
Vo = 0 ⇒ i c = 0 ⇒ i B = 0 ⇒ Z n = 0
" #
RB −βRL 1
A = ! (B.41)
Z=Z
RS + RB R(β + 1) + (RS ||RB ) RS ||RB
R||
1+β
Problem Set
1. For the transistor amplifier circuit shown in Fig. 10,
• Effect of input coupling capacitance CS .
• Effect of transition layer capacitance CT
294 Extra Element Theorem
Vcc
R1 RL
CT
Vo
RS CS
Vi R2
R
0
C.1.1 Normalisation
Although the element values of these two converters vary widely, both these
converters, when scaled properly, have identical mathematical descriptions.
While comparing different converters for their performance indices, it is neces-
sary to scale the defining equations suitably so that comparisons may be made
readily. It is usual therefore, to scale the model such that the switching time
period of the simulated model is always 1 unit. One such scaled description of
the converters is the ”per unit” description of the converter. Such descriptions
are standard in power systems and electrical machines analysis.
di dvO vO
Buck Converter L = vG u − vO C =i−
dt dt R
di dvO vO
Boost Converter L = vG − vO u C = iu −
dt dt R
di dvO vO
Buck-Boost Converter L = vG u − vO u C = −iu −
dt dt R
The equations are identical to the original set except that they are now in per
unit parameters. Usually the stars for the parameters may be conveniently
C.1 Normalised Models of Switched Mode Power Converters 297
omitted.
Advantages of pu system:
• Simulation frequency is 1 unit.
• Normalised element values are more convenient to handle.
• Simulation step size can be fixed (at say 0.01 unit) and the total simula-
tion time can also be fixed (at say 100 units).
Disadvantages of pu system:
• The results are scaled and therefore have to be interpreted carefully. One
unit of voltage in simulation will correspond to Vg volts, one unit of time
in simulation will correspond to Ts seconds, and so on.
di∗ ∗ ∗
∗
dvO ∗
∗
vO
Buck Converter L∗ = vG u − vO C∗ = i −
dt∗ dt∗ R∗
di∗ ∗ ∗
∗
dvO ∗
∗
vO
Boost Converter L∗ = vG − vO u C∗ = i u −
dt∗ dt∗ R∗
di∗ ∗ ∗
∗
∗ dvO ∗
∗
vO
Buck-Boost Converter L∗ = v G u − v O u C = −i u −
dt∗ dt∗ R∗
Table 2 gives the per unit description of the the three basic dc to dc convert-
ers. With practice normally the stars are dropped and the normal description
directly holds for the pu description, except that the parameters are in pu
quantities.
We may carry the pu description further and draw some more important
conclusions. In power converters, the selection of L and C follow from the
specifications of current ripple allowed in the inductor and the voltage ripple
allowed in the output voltage.
298 Per Unit Description of Switched Mode Power Converters
Let δI and δVo be the specified limits on the current and voltage ripple
respectively. The steady state current & voltage ripple for the different con-
verters are given in Table 3. The same quantities in pu parameters are given
in Table 4.
∗ 2
The pu power P ∗ is related to the pu resistance R∗ = (vO ) /P ∗ . The
relationship between the ripple factors and the per unit power is given in Table
5. The design criteria for selecting L and C may be obtained as follows. Table
6 gives the desired pu inductance and capacitance as a function of operating
paramenters.
∗ 2
Buck Converter (1 − d) (vO ) /P ∗ L∗ (1 − d)/8L∗ C ∗
∗ 2 ∗ 2 ∗
Boost Converter d(1 − d)2 (vO ) /P ∗ L∗ dP ∗ / (vO ) C
∗ 2 ∗ 2 ∗
Buck-Boost Converter (1 − d)2 (vO ) /P ∗ L∗ dP ∗ / (vO ) C
L∗ C∗
∗ 2
Buck Converter (1 − d) (vO ) /P ∗ δi (1 − d)/8L∗ δv
∗ 2 ∗ 2
Boost Converter d(1 − d)2 (vO ) /P ∗ δi dP ∗ / (vO ) δv
∗ 2 ∗ 2
Buck-Boost Converter (1 − d)2 (vO ) /P ∗ δi dP ∗ / (vO ) δv
300 Per Unit Description of Switched Mode Power Converters
We may also find the total energy handling capacity of the reactive elements
in the converter.
L∗ (i∗ )2 C ∗ (vO∗ 2
)
E ∗ = EL∗ + EC∗ = +
2 2
The total energy storage requirement of the different converters are given in
Table 7.
∗ (1 − d)P ∗ δi P ∗ dP ∗ dP ∗ P ∗ dP ∗
E + + +
2δi 16δv 2δi 2δv 2δi 2δv
The energy storage requirements for the different converters may be plotted
as a function of the duty ratio d as shown in Fig. 1. From the stored energy
30
Buck−Boost
E*
Boost
Buck
0
0 D 0.5 1
1. For the same power level and performance (steady-state ripple), buck con-
verter needs nearly one order of magnitude less energy storage compared
to the other two converters.
2. In buck converter the predominant energy storage element is the induc-
tor. In the other two converters the predominant storage element is the
capacitor.
3. The preferred operating duty ratio of buck converter is above 0.5. The
preferred operating duty ratio of the other two converters is below 0.5.
4. The higher the energy stored in the converter, the slower is its response.
This may be seen from Table 8 giving the natural frequency of the different
converters.
Natural Frequency
s
1 8δv
Buck Converter √
L∗ C ∗ 1−d
s
1−d δi δv
Boost Converter √
L∗ C ∗ d2
s
1−d δi δv
Buck-Boost Converter √
L∗ C ∗ d
1.0
Buck
Boost
Buck−Boost
0
0 D 0.5 1
Boost Converter
Buck-Boost Converter
Visualisation of Functions
The skill of visualisation is essential for any designer. In this direction it will
be good to develop such skills through visualisation of mathematical functions.
ao
y(t)
t
y(t) = ao + a1 t (D.3)
The next level of complexity in such fuctions is the function given in Eq. 3.
The functional relationship is shown in Fig. 2. Notice that this function y(t) is
not linear in t. Verify that this relationship does not satisfy the conditions for
linearity (homogeneity and superposition). Figure 3 shows the function which
is linear (y(t) = a1 t). Figure 4 shows the functions y(t) = t and y(t) = t2
on the same graph. It may be noticed that the function y(t) = t is linear,
306 Visualisation of Functions
y(t) y(t) = a o + a 1t
ao t
y(t)
y(t) = a 1 t
t
Polynomial Functions
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
f1oft
f2oft
0 0
-1 -1
-2 -2
-3 -3
f1oft vs time
f2oft vs time
-4 -4
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
time in Sec
while the function y(t) = t2 is nonlinear. The function y(t) = t is odd and
the function y(t) = t2 is even. Both the functions are continuous. It is a good
practice to visualise functions, sketch the same and note the salient features of
the fucntion such as properties of oddness or evenness, values at crucial points
(such as t = 0, t = 1, t = ∞), polarity, minimum, maximum, slopes at crucial
points, discontinuities if any, etc.
D.1 Mathematical Functions 307
f (t) = et (D.4)
Exponential Function
8 8
foft vs time
6 6
4 4
2 2
foft
0 0
-2 -2
-4 -4
-6 -6
-8 -8
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
time in Sec
exponential function is neither even nor odd. The value of the function is 1 for
t = 0. The function increases monotonically with time and goes to ∞ as time
goes to ∞. Another important feature of the exponential ! function is that the
dy
slope of the function is the function itself = y = et . At time t = 0, the
!
dt
dy
functional value is 1 and so the slope of the function at t = 0.
dt
Consider the function
f (t) = e−t (D.6)
The polynomial expansion of the exponential function is as given in Eq. [7].
t t2 t3 1
e−t = 1 − + − + ... = (D.7)
1! 2! 3! t t2 t3
1 + + + + ...
1! 2! 3!
308 Visualisation of Functions
4 4
2 2
foft
0 0
-2 -2
-4 -4
-6 -6
-8 -8
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
time in Sec
The negative exponential function is also neither even nor odd. It may be
seen that the negative exponential function is a mirror reflection of the positive
exponential function about the y axis. The negative exponential function
monotonically falls to 0 as t goes to ∞. The slope of the negative
! exponential
dy
function is negative of the function itself = −y = −e−t . At time t = 0,
dt
!
dy
the functional value is 1 and the slope of the function at t = 0 is −1.
dt
The function may be decomposed into t and e−t . The function t monotonically
increases with t and goes to ∞ as t goes to ∞. The part e−t is a monotonically
decreasing function with t and goes to inf ty as t goes to ∞. The product
is 0 at t = 0 and at t = ∞. This may be verified by expanding e−t in the
denominator and taking in t to the denominator. We also see that the function
has a maxima for some t between 0 and ∞. This may be verified to be at t = 1.
The function f (t) = te−t is plotted for values t = 0 to 4 in Fig. 7.
D.1 Mathematical Functions 309
A Composite Function
2 2
t vs time
e-t-t
vs time
te vs time
1.5 1.5
t, e-t, te-t
1 1
0.5 0.5
0 0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2
time in Sec
Trigonometric Functions
2 2
1.5 1.5
1 1
0.5 0.5
Cos(2 pi t)
Sin(2 pi t)
0 0
-0.5 -0.5
-1 -1
-1.5 -1.5
Sin(2 pi t) vs time
Cos(2 pi t) vs time
-2 -2
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
time in Sec
3 3
2 2
1 1
t Cos(2 pi t)
t Sin(2 pi t)
0 0
-1 -1
-2 -2
-3 t vs time -3
t Sin(2 pi t) vs time
t Cos(2 pi t) vs time
-4 -4
-4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4
time in Sec
Hyperbolic Functions
4 4
3 3
2 2
1 1
Cosh(t)
Sinh(t)
0 0
-1 -1
-2 -2
-3 -3
Sinh(t) vs time
Cosh(t) vs time
-4 -4
-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2
time in Sec
Constant Function
dy
= 0; y(0) = 1; (D.22)
dt
y(t) = 1
Linear Polynomial
dy
= a1 ; y(0) = ao ; (D.23)
dt
y(t) = ao + a1 t
dy
= ω y; y(0) = ao ; (D.24)
dt
y(t) = ao eω t
D.2 Functions as Differential Equations 313
dy
= −ω y; y(0) = ao ; (D.25)
dt
y(t) = ao e−ω t
Cosinusoidal Function
d2 y
!
dy
= −ω 2 y; y(0) = ao ; = 0; (D.26)
dt2 dt t=0
Sinusoidal Function
d2 y
!
dy
= −ω 2 y; y(0) = 0; = bo ω; (D.27)
dt2 dt t=0
d2 y
!
dy
= −ω 2 y; y(0) = ao ; = bo ω; (D.28)
dt2 dt t=0
d2 y
!
dy
= ω 2 y; y(0) = ao ; = 0; (D.29)
dt2 dt t=0
d2 y
!
dy
= ω 2 y; y(0) = 0; = bo ω; (D.30)
dt2 dt t=0
d2 y
!
dy
= ω 2 y; y(0) = ao ; = bo ω; (D.31)
dt2 dt t=0
Strong Function of V
100
Speed vs V
80
Speed in rad/sec
60
40
20
0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
V in Volt
Weak Function of T
100
Speed vs Torque
80
Speed in rad/sec
60
40
20
0
0 2 4 6 8 10
Torque in Nm
seen that the speed is a strong function of V . Figure 12 shows the speed as a
function of torque. It may be seen that the speed is a weak function of torque
in a separately excited dc machine.
Consider the function Y = f (X) as shown in Fig. 13. It may be seen that
Y is a weak function of X in the range of 0 < X < 15. In the range
15 < X < 40, Y is a strong function of X.
60
Y
40
20
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
X
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 5 10 15 20
Input Voltage in Volt
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Duty Ratio
Other features that may be noticed in Fig. 15 are the maximum present in the
D.5 Steady-State and Dynamic Performance 317
gain, positive incremental gain for small values of d, and negative incremental
gain for large values of d.
dω TG − T L
= (D.36)
dt J
This is the dynamic equation of a rotary mechanical system (e.g. a motor
connected to a load). Under steady-state, the solution to the above equation
N N
Steady−State Speed
TL
TG = TL
dN/dt
_
TG TL
TG
T 0 t
TL N N
TG = TL
Steady−State Speed
TG _
TG TL
dN/dt
T 0 t
|Z| dB Ω
L R
(1/C) rad/sec
|Z| dB Ω
L R
L R Series RL Circuit
Consider a series RL circuit as shown in Fig. 19. In a series circuit, the higher
of the impedances will prevail. This may be readily seen in the figure.
Consider a shunt RC circuit as shown in Fig. 20. In a shunt circuit, the lower
of the impedances will prevail. This may be readily seen in the figure.
Shunt RC Circuit
|Z| dB Ω C C
R
R
(1/C) rad/sec
log (rad/sec)
|Z| dB Ω L
R
C L C
R log (rad/sec)
1/L 1/ LC 1/C
Consider the circuit shown in Fig. 21. The circuit consists of a capacitor in
parallel with a series RL circuit. The impedance diagram is shown in Fig. 21.
The parallel resonance of L and C is also seen in the impedance diagram. The
intercepts of the asymptotes give the various circuit elements as well.
320 Visualisation of Functions
ω rp
log (rad/sec)
ω rz log (rad/sec)
Figure D.22: Asymptotic Magnitude Plots of Drp (s) and Nrz (s)
plots for normalised simple real pole Drp (s) and normalised simple real zero
Nrz (s). Figure 23 shows the asymptotic magnitude plots for complex pole pair
Dcp (s) and normalised complex zero pair Ncz (s). It may be seen that the plot
for zeroes is the mirror reflection (on the 0 dB axis) of the plot for poles. The
overall plot for the network function G(s) will be the sum of the individual
plots for G(0), N (s), D(s) etc. Consider the network function given by the
D.7 Rational Polynomials 321
40 dB/decade
dB Complex Pole Pair dB
Qp ω cz
log (rad/sec)
ω cp log (rad/sec)
Qz
Figure D.23: Asymptotic Magnitude Plots of Dcp (s) and Ncz (s)
dB −20 dB/decade
3
20 dB
160
+20
dBΩ 10
20 50 100 200 2k 5 k 10 k 20 k
|Z|
10 1k log (rad/sec)
−20
−5
C2
C1
L3
Z L1
R1 L2 R2
VP
f(t)
t
VM
0 T 2T 3T
2π
ω = (D.43)
T
1 T
Z
a0 = f (t) dt (D.44)
T 0
2
Z T
an = f (t) Cos nωt dt (D.45)
T 0
2
Z T
bn = f (t) Sin nωt dt (D.46)
T 0
The coefficients an are the even fourier coefficients of f (t) and bn are the odd
fourier coefficients of f (t).
f(t) f(t)
t t
(a) (b)
zero. It is obvious that for these functions, the coefficient a0 is zero. Figure
29 shows two periodic waveforms with non-zero average value and therefore
non-zero a0 . It is possible therefore by inspecting a periodic waveform, to
324 Visualisation of Functions
f(t) f(t)
t t
(a) (b)
conclude if the function has average value or in other words zero or non-zero
coefficient a0 . In a similar way it is possible to conclude zero or non-zero values
of an and bn . Periodic functions which are even, will have only non-zero an .
Periodic functions which are odd, will have only non-zero bn . Functions which
are neither even nor odd will have both an and bn . In other words, odd periodic
functions may be decomposed into sine series; even periodic functions may be
decomposed into cosine series. General periodic functions which are neither
odd or even may be decomposed into sum of one even and one odd periodic
function. These functions may be respectively expanded into a cosine series
and a sine series respectively. For example consider the periodic function f (t).
This may be decomposed into an even function fe (t) and an odd function fo (t).
f (t) + f (−t)
fe (t) = (D.47)
2
f (t) − f (−t)
fo (t) = (D.48)
2
Figure 30 shows two even functions. They have only cosine terms. Figure 31
f(t) f(t)
t t
(a) (b)
f(t) f(t)
t t
(a) (b)
shows two odd functions which have only sine terms. It may also be noticed
that pure odd/even functions may be seen as even/odd functions by just shift-
ing the origin. In power electronic systems, power source is synthesised with
electronic switches. Pulse width modulation is employed in order to synthesise
voltages/currents with low harmonic content. In such cases it is usual to seek
zero average voltage from inverters, eliminate even harmonics and push the
lowest order harmonics to as high a frequency as possible. It may be verified
f(t) f(t)
−π/2 t −π/2 t
−π 0 π/2 π −π 0 π/2 π
(a) (b)
f(t) f(t)
−π π/2 π t −π π/2 π
t
−π/2 −π/2
(a) (b)
that functions exhibiting quarter wave symmetry as shown in Fig. 32 and Fig.
33 do not have even harmonics.
326 Visualisation of Functions
Appendix E
Power electronic circuits consist of electric circuit elements connected with one
or more switches. The circuit elements are R, L, and C. These circuits are
piece-wise (for each switch position) linear. Therefore it is helpful to catalogue
and analyse such circuits in their generic form. These results may be adopted
as and when necessary while analysing power electronic circuits.
S R
C
V(t)
Vi
VC (0) = V(0)
V (t) = V (0) e−t/RC + Vi 1 − e−t/RC (E.1)
Ii IL (0) = I(0)
I(t)
S
L R
T2 S L
I L (0) = I(0) R
T1
Vi I(t)
T1 at t = 0.
I(t) = I(0) e−Rt/L (E.3)
When we consider that the switch S is thrown from T1 to T2 at t = 0,
Vi
I(t) = I(0) e−Rt/L + 1 − e−Rt/L (E.4)
R
Ii S T2
C R
T1
V(t)
VC (0) = V(0)
L
S I(t) C
V(t)
Vi
I L (0) = 0 VC (0) = V(0)
5 15
V(t)
I(t)
0 10
-5 5
I(t) vs time
V(t) vs time
-10 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
time in Sec
Ii VC (0) = 0
L
S C V(t)
I(t)
I L (0) = I(0)
s
L t
V (t) = (Ii − I(0)) sin √ (E.9)
C LC
t
I(t) = Ii − (Ii − I(0)) cos √ (E.10)
LC
Figure 8 shows the inductor current and capacitor voltage for Ii = 10 A,
I(0) = 5 A, L = 1 H, and C = 1 F . Notice the starting values of
V (0) = 0 and I(0) = 5 A. The circuit is loss-less and therefore the voltage
across the source is a pure sinusoid. It may be also noticed that the average
current on the inductor is Ii = 10 A. This also confirms that the average dc
E.7 LC Circuit with Series and Shunt Excitation 331
5 15
V(t)
I(t)
0 10
-5 5
V(t) vs time
I(t) vs time
-10 0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
time in Sec
current through the capacitor is 0. The voltage peak of the capacitor is seen to
be
the net
s
capacitor current (Ii − I(0))) multiplied by the natural impedance
Z =
L
. The frequency of oscillation is seen to have a period of 2π
C
√
(T = 2π LC) seconds. It may be seen that the circuits in Figs 5 and 7 are
dual of each other.
Figure 9 shows an LC circuit with dual excitation. There are several possible
S1 S2
Ii P T2 L P T2
I(t) Vi
T1 T1
I L (0) = I(0)
V(t) C
VC (0) = V(0)
transients in this circuit. Depending upon the initial position of the switches
S1 and S2 , the initial conditions also vary.
332 Transients in Linear Electric Circuits
S1 S2 t=0 +
Ii P t=0 − T2 L P t=0 − T2
I(t) Vi
t=0 + T1 T1
V(t) I L (0) = 0
C
VC (0) = 0
S1 t=0 + S2
Ii P t=0 − T2 L P t=0 − T2
I(t) Vi
T1 t=0 + T1
V(t) I L (0) = 0
C
VC (0) = 0
Current Excitation
!
− +
S1 : P T1 ; S2 : P T1 at t = 0 to S1 : P T2 ; S2 : P T1 at t = 0
The initial conditions are as follows.
Dual Excitation
!
S1 : P T1 ; S2 : P T1 at t = 0− to S1 : P T2 ; S2 : P T2 at t = 0+
The initial conditions are as follows.
S1 t=0 + S2 t=0 +
Ii P t=0 − T2 L P t=0 − T2
I(t) Vi
T1 T1
V(t) I L (0) = 0
C
VC (0) = 0
S1 S2 t=0 −
Ii P t=0 − T2 L P T2
I(t) t=0 + Vi
t=0 + T1 T1
I L (0) = 0
V(t) C
VC (0) = V i
Current Excitation
!
− +
S1 : P T1 ; S2 : P T2 at t = 0 to S1 : P T2 ; S2 : P T2 at t = 0
The initial conditions are as follows.
Ii P t=0 − T2 L P T2
I(t) Vi
T1 T1
I L (0) = 0
V(t) C
VC (0) = V i
Dual Excitation
!
− +
S1 : P T1 ; S2 : P T2 at t = 0 to S1 : P T2 ; S2 : P T1 at t = 0
The initial conditions are as follows.
S1 t=0 + S2 t=0 −
Ii P t=0 − T2 L P T2
I(t) t=0 + Vi
T1 T1
V(t) I L (0) = 0
C
VC (0) = V i
Ii P T2 L P − T2
I(t) t=0
T1 T1 Vi
I L(0) = I i
V(t) C
VC (0) = 0
Current Excitation
!
S1 : P T2 ; S2 : P T1 at t = 0− to S1 : P T1 ; S2 : P T1 at t = 0+
The initial conditions are as follows.
S1 t=0 − S2
Ii P t=0 + T2 L P − T2
I(t) t=0 Vi
T1 t=0 + T1
V(t) I L(0) = I i
C
VC (0) = 0
Dual Excitation
!
− +
S1 : P T2 ; S2 : P T1 at t = 0 to S1 : P T1 ; S2 : P T2 at t = 0
The initial conditions are as follows.
S1 t=0 − S2 t=0 +
Ii P t=0 + T2 L P − T2
I(t) t=0
T1 T1 Vi
V(t) I L(0) = I i
C
VC (0) = 0
s
t L t
V (t) = Vi − Vi cos √ − Ii sin √ (E.37)
LC C LC
Ii P T2 L P T2
I(t) t=0 + Vi
T1 T1
V(t) I L(0) = I i
C
VC (0) = V i
t
V (t) = Vi cos √ (E.40)
LC
338 Transients in Linear Electric Circuits
Current Excitation
!
− +
S1 : P T2 ; S2 : P T2 at t = 0 to S1 : P T1 ; S2 : P T2 at t = 0
The initial conditions are as follows.
Ii P t=0 + T2 L P T2
I(t) Vi
T1 T1
V(t) I L(0) = I i
C
VC (0) = V i
t
I(t) = Ii cos √ (E.42)
LC
s
L t
V (t) = Vi − Ii sin √ (E.43)
C LC
Dual Excitation
!
− +
S1 : P T2 ; S2 : P T2 at t = 0 to S1 : P T1 ; S2 : P T1 at t = 0
The initial conditions are as follows.
S1 t=0 − S2 t=0 −
Ii P T2 L P T2
t=0 + I(t) t=0 + Vi
T1 T1
V(t) I L(0) = I i
C
VC (0) = V i
Design Reviews
F.1 Introduction
In this section we will see the design reviews of a few sample converters taken
from the application notes of device/controller manufacturers.
F.2.1 Specifications
Topology:
Two Switch forward converter with proportional drive
Input:
117 V ±15% (99 - 135 V), 60 Hz
230 V ±15% (195 - 265 V), 50 Hz
Output:
Voltage: 5 V Current: 5 – 50 A
Current Limit:
60A – Short circuit
Ripple Voltage:
100 mV – peak to peak
Line Regulation:
±1%
Load Regulation:
±1%
Others:
Efficiency: 75%
Isolation: 3750 V
342 Design Reviews
Frequency: 40 kHz
The input consists of an EMI filter followed by a fullwave rectifier connected
in the voltage doubler mode for 110V ac input and normal mode for 230V ac
input. The rectifier is followed by a capacitive filter made up of C1 and C2 .
The maximum of average dc bus current may be evaluated from the output
power, minimum dc bus voltage, and an estimate of the overall efficiency.
Po 250
Idc (max) = = = 1.21 A
Vdc (min)η 276 x 0.75
The capacitor has to supply this current for about a half cycle without drop-
ping the dc bus voltage below 85%.
Idc (max)(2/f ) 1.2 x 0.010
C= = = 290 µF
0.15 x Vdc (min) 0.15 x 276
The design uses 2x600 µF in series, which is equivalent to 300 µF bus ca-
pacitance.
3. The clamp diodes completely recover the magnetising energy in the core.
4. Filter requirement is low.
5. Dynamic model is simple and closed loop control is easy.
F.2 A 250W Off-Line Forward Converter 343
The limitation of the circuit is that two power switches are needed with the
associated drive circuits. The duty ratio is restricted to 50%.
Maximum value of d occurs when Vdc is minimum. Notice that the tran-
sistor ON drop is neglected, while the diode ON drop is not.
Vo + V D
d(max) = ≤ 0.5
n Vdc
d(max) = 0.5 ; Vo = 5 ; VD = 1 ; Vdc = 0.85 Vdc(min)
1
n=
19.55
The design employs a turns ratio of 1/15.33 (6:92), so that d(max) is less
than 0.5 (0.39). This gives extra margin on the duty ratio to get a better
dynamic range. With the selected duty ratio of 15.33, minimum duty ratio is
obtained when the dc link voltage Vdc is maximum. The minimum duty ratio
is
Vo + V D
d(min) = = 0.25
n Vdc
δI ≤ 2 Idc (min) = 10 A
Vo + V D
δI = TS ≤ 10 A ; L ≥ 11.3µH
L
344 Design Reviews
(maximum input voltage & light load). K therefore varies from 3.1 (9.7 dB)
to 4.9 (14 dB). The control transfer function is shown on Fig. 1 for both
minimum (Gmin ) & maximum (Gmax ) conditions. The dc gain is noticed to be
quite low. The zero dB crossover slope is also seen to be more than 1. There-
fore the compensator must have a pole-zero pair to achieve sufficient stability
margins, and a PI part to achieve the desired steady state error.
H(s)
G(s)
0 dB
f1, f2, f3 = 1 kHz 2 kHz GH(s)
26 kHz
Vo 1k
Vc
30k
Vo* 33k
The compensator used is also shown in Fig. 1. The transfer function of the
compensator is The compensator transfer function is plotted on Fig. 1. On the
same plot the overall loop gain is also plotted. It is seen that the compensator
design is satisfactory with a bandwidth of about 20 KHz, and a phase margin
of 45. Notice that only the gain magnitude is plotted. This is because, the
forward converter does not have any RHP zeros and so the phase function will
be a minimal phase function. Notice also that the Q of the complex pole pair
is really not important as far as the compensator design is concerned.
F.3.1 Specifications
Input Voltage:
48 ± V
Output Voltage:
5V
Output Current:
25 A to 100 A
Short Circuit Current:
120 A
Switching Frequency:
200 kHz
Line Regulation:
0.12 %
Load Regulation:
0.25 %
Efficiency:
75 %
Large Signal Slew Rate:
30 A/ms
non-isolated drive circuits for the power devices. The disadvantage is that
the push-pull converter is prone to dc saturation of the transformer. However
this disadvantage can be overcome if the converter is operated in the current
programmed mode. This converter employs current mode control.
5
Rmax = = 0.2 Ω ; Ts = 5µs
25
Kmin Rmax Ts
L= = 5µH
2
The design uses a 5.8 µH inductor. The ripple current is
The ripple voltage at the output may be assumed to be equally devided be-
tween the capacitor and the ESR of the capacitor.
δITs
δVo = + ESR δI
8C
δITs 2.3 ∗ 5 ∗ 10−6
C= = = 28.8 µF
4δVo 4 ∗ 0.1
δVo 0.1
ESR = = = 22 mΩ
2δI 2 ∗ 2.3
The design uses a 20 µF capacitor with ESR of 7.5 mΩ. The zero on ac-
count of the ESR will be beyond 1 MHz and can be conveniently neglected for
the compensator design.
470 Ω 4.3 Ω
Vref Rt/Ct 1.8 V
GND GND
The control circuit has available a ramp generated from the internal oscillator
as shown in the Fig. 2. The slope of the available ramp is
1.8
= 0.3 V /µs ; τ = 5.6k ∗ 0.0015 µF
0.71τ
The compensation ramp desired is
Vo + V F
M2 = RF CTrati P Tratio = 0.0089 V /µs
L
The desired attenuation for the compensating ramp is therefore
0.3
= 33.7
0.0089
The design uses an attenuator (32.9) made up of 470 Ω and 15 KΩ. The
control is therefore adequately compensated.
4.55
h2 (s) = ; in 2842
(1 + s/2π100)
The compensator transfer functions and the overall loopgain are also plot-
ted on Fig. 3. The realisation of the compensator is also shown in Fig. 3. The
bandwidth is seen to be in the range of 9 KHz to 36 KHz.
dB
h1(s)
0 dB
0 dB G(s)
h2(s)
12 k
0.113 µ 160 kHz
4.7 k
2k 0.016 µ
h1(s) 22 k 100 k
1.5 k h2(s)
Application Note:
60WFlyback.pdf
Controller IC:
UC3841.pdf
F.4.1 Specifications
Input Voltage:
117 V ± 15%, 60 Hz
Output Voltage:
1) 5V, ± 5%, 2.5 A to 5 A, δV < 1%
Switching Frequency:
80 kHz
Efficiency:
70 % minimum
Isolation:
3750 V
V1
ip C1
L1 R1
i1
LP
V2
Vdc C2
L2 R2
i2
we go on to study the design, let us look into the flyback topology operating
in the discontinuous conduction mode (in its ideal behaviour) with multiple
outputs, in order to obtain the necessary design relationships. These design
relationships may be later on used to obtain a coherent design procedure. The
ideal, two output, isolated, flyback converter operating in the dcm, is shown
F.4 A Multiple Output Flyback Converter in DCM 353
in Fig. 4. The steady state waveforms of the converter are shown in Fig. 5.
ip ipm
t
i1m
i1
t
dTs d21 Ts
i2m
i2 t
vL1
t
vL2 d22 Ts
t
i1m and i2m are related to the intervals d21 , d22 , and the load currents by the
following relationships.
V1 d21 Ts i1m d21 V1
i1m = =
L1 2 R1
V2 d22 Ts i1m d21 V1
i2m = =
L2 2 R1
Combining the above sets of relationship, we get
2V1 V1 d21 Ts √ 2L1
= d21 = K 1 ; K1 =
R1 d21 L1 R 1 Ts
2V2 V2 d22 Ts √
2L2
= d22 = K 2 ; K2 =
R2 d22 L2 R 2 Ts
354 Design Reviews
Vdc dTs N2
− V2 d22 Ts = 0
Np
d N2
V2 = √ Vdc
K2 N p
d2 = (1 − d)
d2 < (1 − d)
√ √
d21 = K1 < (1 − d) ; d22 = K2 < (1 − d)
√
(1 − d22 )Ts V2 (1 − K2 )Ts
δV2 = =
C2 R2 C2 R2
di dV V
L =V ;C = −i − ; during d2 Ts
dt dt R
di dV V
L =0;C = − ; during (1 − d − d2 )Ts
dt dt R
d2
0 d
L
L
A=
;b=
d2 1
− − 0
C RC
356 Design Reviews
1 d2
d
− −
LC RC L L
X = −A−1 b Vdc = − 2 Vdc
d2
d2
0 0
C
dVdc
I Rd22
=
V dVdc
−
d2
d d Vdc Idc
V = Vdc ; I = 2 = −
d2 d2 R d2
The small signal model of the converter is
Vdc
L
f = (A1 − A2 )X + (b1 − b2 )Vdc =
0
dVdc
Vdc
0 Rd22
L
g = (A2 − A3 )X + (b2 − b3 )Vdc =
1 dVdc
− 0 −
C d2
The small signal model in the state space form is
DVdc
D2
0
D
Vdc
−
L D2 L
L v̂ + L
x̂˙ = ˆ dˆ2
x̂+ d+
dc
DVdc
D2 1
−− 0 0 −
C RC RCD22
From the above equation dˆ2 may be eliminated with the help of the following
relationship.
Vdc dTs V d 2 Ts
Ip = =−
L L
F.4 A Multiple Output Flyback Converter in DCM 357
Vdc D D2
dˆ2 = − dˆ − v̂dc − v̂
V V V
The system equation on elimination of dˆ2 , reduces to
0 0 0 0
x̂˙ = dˆ
x̂ + v̂dc +
D2 2 D Vdc
− −
− −
C RC D2 RC D2 RC
As expected the top row is zero. In other words, the inductor current ve-
locity is zero and has ceased to be a state of the system.
î˙ = 0
D2 D Vdc ˆ
v̂˙ = − î − v̂dc − d
C D2 RC D2 RC
From the above equation î may be eliminated with the help of the follow-
ing relationship.
DVdc
I=
RK
Vdc ˆ D
î = d+ v̂dc
KR KR
and apply the above results. With the above results on the dcm operation of
the flyback converter now we may study the converter.
K1min I1min 1
= =
K1max I1max 2
K2min I2min 1
= =
K2max I2max 2.9
√ 0.45
dmin = 2 = 0.17
2.7
The nominal duty ratio is (0.45+0.17)/2 = 0.31
2Pomax
Ipmax = = 3.17 A
ηVdcmin dmax
2Pomin
Ipmin = = 2.63 A
ηVdcmax dmin
F.4.15 Selection of K
The maximum duty ratio is 0.45. During transients we may allow the duty
ratio to go up to 0.7. Therefore K is chosen such that dcm is obtained upto a
duty ratio of 0.7.
0.096 R1min Ts
L1 = = 0.56 µH
2
s
N1 L1 1
= = 0.06 =
Np Lp 17.2
s
N2 L2 1
= = 0.12 =
Np Lp 8.42
V1
ip C1
L1 R1
i1
V2
C2
LP L2 R2
i2
Vdc
VW
LW
ωpmax = 119rad/s ⇒ 19 Hz
1
Modulator gain is (for IC 3840)
3.5
K = 23 to 31 dB ; ωp ⇒ 8 to 19 Hz
The openloop bode plot of the converter is shown in Fig. 7. The gain is
not a single function of s, because of the variation in load as a function of
the converter parameters. Therefore the extreme values Gmin and Gmax are
shown.
20 dB
GH(s) GH(s)
H(s)
0 dB
G(s) G(s)
−20 dB
−40 dB
1 Hz 10 Hz 100 Hz 1 kHz 10 kHz 100 kHz
F.4.18 Compensator
The compensator used for this design example is shown in Fig. 8. The compen-
sator gain and the overall loopgain are also shown in Fig. 7. The compensator
R2 (1 + s/ω1 ) (1 + s/ω1 )
transfer function is H(s) = = Hdc
R1 (1 + s/ω2 ) (1 + s/ω2 )
F.4 A Multiple Output Flyback Converter in DCM 363
15 k
12 k 0.01 µ F
V*
0.68 µ F 10 k
1 1
Hdc = 2 dB ; ω1 = ⇒ 1 kHz ; ω2 = ⇒ 20 Hz
R1 C1 R2 C2
It may be sen that the loopgain crossover frequency varies widely and is well
into the region where the converter non-idealities become appreciable (ESR
zero in the vicinity above 10 KHz, and Nyquist frequency namely fs /2 = 40
KHz). We will see later on how these drawbacks in this design example are
managed.
F.4.24 Compensation
The compensator elements are connected to the error amplifier terminals to
achieve the desired compensator transfer function.
nullified. Then the variation of dc gain will be on account of only the conduc-
tion parameter K, which is quite small. Earlier we took Vs to be 3.5 and Vdc
in the range of 120 to 190 V. In this example Vs is nominally 3.5 and varies in
proportion to Vdc . This feature is shown in Fig. 9. As a result the gain is
Vdc (nominal) NW 1 6.9
Gdc = √ =√
K Np Vs (nominal) K
Gmax occurs for Rmax , and corresponds to ωpmin . Similarly Gmin occurs for
Rmin , and corresponds to ωpmax . With these recalculated Gmax and Gmin ,
the overall loopgain is shown in Fig. 10. The range of variation in loopgain
crossover frequency is seen to be verymuch improved (6 KHz to 15 KHz). An-
other point to observe is that the duty ratio limit is also now fed from Vdc .
20 dB GH(s)
GH(s)
H(s)
0 dB
G(s) G(s)
−20 dB
−40 dB
1 Hz 10 Hz 100 Hz 1 kHz 10 kHz 100 kHz
Construction Projects
G.1 Introduction
It is noticed that the curriculum in most subjects are currently moving away
from laboratory based instruction. The laboratory sessions when stated, in-
variably are based on canned software loaded on PCs and almost totally di-
vorced from the theoretical basis of the subject. Hardware laboratory sessions
are missing and the students miss the most exciting and durable mode of learn-
ing. Most universities now teach an elective course on switched mode power
conversion (SMPC). However, the students rarely learn the skills of assembling
circuits, testing and debugging the same, and eventually designing application
circuits. Most students have not had an opportunity to use independently
simple instruments such as signal generators and multimeters; nor have they
acquired prototyping skills such as breadboards, printed circuit boards, sol-
dering etc. As a result most students feel diffident about the subject and stay
away from a career in engineering industry.
The purpose of this section is to present short construction projects which
will enable the student to learn the skills of fabrication, testing and debugging
skills and eventually design skills. The objective is to make these projects as
part of the SMPC curriculum. The resource base needed may not be more
than a the soldering iron for assembling the circuit; a laboratory power supply
& a multimeter for testing the same, a signal generator & a general purpose
oscilloscope (CRO) for debugging the same. Each project may not take more
than one session of 3 hours. The execution of the construction work may not
take more than about Rs. 150/= worth of components.
ConstructionProjects
The circuits, components etc are given in the following link.
Assembly Instructions
Kit Vendors
The following vendor has the construction project kits available in ready to
assemble kit as well as fully assembled boards.
H.1 Introduction
This section points to several programmes covering circuit simulation of power
switching devices, power converters, drives etc. There are several circuit simu-
lation software such as PSPICE, SABER, etc which are commercially available.
This section presents the application of an open source circuit simulation soft-
ware developed by Prof. M.B. Patil of IIT Mumbai. The same is available
from the website of IIT Mumbai.
Sequel also can be extended by the user by developing suitable device li-
braries. The accompanying document also demonstrates many of these fea-
tures.
Kit Vendors
The following vendor has the construction project kits available in ready to
assemble kit as well as fully assembled boards.
Hardware Kits
New Tech Systems,
Attention: Mr. Jayaram Raju,
No. 1774, 3rd Stage,
Prakash Nagar,
Bangalore 560021
Phone: 080 2342 2263
370 Simulation of Power Converters
Theses
I.4 Electromagnetics
1. Ramanamurthy G. S., M.Sc (Engg), March 1999
Design of Transformers and Inductors at Power Frequency - A Modified
Area-Product Method
2. Milind, M.Sc (Engg), March 2005
Linear Electromagnetic Stirrer
Milind
374 Theses
Appendix J
Publications
J.1 Journals
1. ”Sliding Mode Control of Brushless dc Motor”, JIISc, July-Aug. 1987,
pp 279-306
jiisc1987.pdf
19. ”A Two Stage Power Converter Topology for High Voltage DC Power
Supplies Under Pulsed Load”, EPE Journal, Vol. 16, N0. 2, April, May,
June 2006, pp 45-55
epe20061.pdf
21. ”Polyphase Boost Converter with Digital Control”, EPE Journal, Vol.
16, N0. 3, September 2006, pp 52-59
epe20062.pdf
22. ”Mutual Coupling and Its Effect on Steady-State Performance and Po-
sition Estimation of Even and Odd Number Phase Switched Reluctance
Motor Drive”, IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, Vol. 43, No.8, August
2007, pp 3445-3456
ieee200701.pdf
23. ”Reduced Acoustic Noise Variable DC-Bus-Based Sensorless Switched
Reluctance Motor Drive for HVAC Applications”, IEEE Transactions on
Industrial Electronics, Vol. 54, No.4, August 2007, pp 2065-2078
ieee200702.pdf
24. ”A Family of Auxiliary Switch ZVS-PWM DC-DC Converters with Cou-
pled Inductor”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 22, No.5,
September 2007, pp 2008-2017
2007Ieee.pdf
J.2 Conferences
1. ”Design of a Switched Reluctance Motor Drive”, Elroma 1992
elroma92.pdf
2. ”Optimum Design of Single Switch Resonant Induction Heater”, IEEE In-
ternational Symposium on Industrial Electronics, May 25-29, 1992, Xian,
People’s Republic of China
ie1992.pdf
3. ” A New Resonant Capacitor Clamping Method for Series Resonant Con-
verters”, 5th Brazilian Power Electronics Conference, COBEP’99, Brazil,
Sept 1999, Pages 3.4.6.1-6
cobep99.pdf
378 Publications
13. ”Phase Angle Balance for Harmonic Filtering of A Three Phase Shunt
Active Flter System”, IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference ’02,
10-14 March 2002, Dallas, USA
apec2002.pdf
14. ”A Two Level Power Conversion for High Voltage DC Power Supply for
Pulsed Load Applications ”, Proc. of European Power Electronics Con-
ference, EPE- PEMC-2002, Cavtat & Dubrovnik, CROATIA, pp T1-012
epe.pdf
15. ”A voltage Sensorless Current Shapng Method for Balancng the Input
Curent of the Three Phase Three Wire Boost Rectifier under Unbalanced
Input Voltage Condition”, Proc. of IEEE Power Electronics Specialists
Conference, PESC 2002., Australia, pp 1941-46
pesc2002.pdf
16. ”An Input Voltage Sensorless Input Current Shaping Method for Three
Phase Three Level High Power Factor Boost Rectifier”, Proc. of IEEE
Industry Applications Society Conference IAS 2002, Pittsburgh, USA.,
vol. 3, pp 2110-2116
ias2002souvik.pdf
17. ”Average Current Mode Control of High Voltage DC Power Supply for
Pulsed Load Application ”, Proc. of IEEE Industry Applications Society
Conference IAS 2002, Pittsburgh, USA., vol2, pp 1205 -1211
ias2002nv.pdf
18. ”Input Voltage Modulated High Voltage DC Power Supply Topology for
Pulsed Load Applications”, Proc of IEEE Conference on Industrial Elec-
tronics IECON’02, November 2002, Sevilla, SPAIN, vol1., pp. 389-394
iecon2002.pdf
19. ”Impedance Emulation Method for A Single Phase Shunt Active Filter”,
Proc. of IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference 2002, Miami Beach,
Florida, USA,vol.2, pp 907-912
apec2003.pdf
20. ”Automatic Voltage Regulator (AVR) Using Electronic Transformer”,
Proc.of National Power Electronics Conference NPEC2003, Mumbai, 16-
17 Oct 2003, pp 130-134
npec031.pdf
21. ”Design of Electromagnetic Stirrer”, Proc.of National Power Electronics
Conference NPEC2003, Mumbai, 16-17 Oct 2003, pp 135-139
npec032.pdf
22. ”Comparison of High Voltage DC Power Supply Topologies for Pulsed
Load Application”, Proc. of IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics,
380 Publications
India, pp 146-151
npec053.pdf
32. ”Construction Projects in the Curriculum of Switched Mode Power Con-
version”, Proceedings of the 2nd National Power Electronics Conference,
December 22 - 24, 2005, NPEC 2005, Kharagpur, India, pp 196-200
npec054.pdf
33. ”Polyphase Boost Converter for Automotive and UPF Applications with
Digital Control”, Proceedings of the 2nd National Power Electronics Con-
ference, December 22 - 24, 2005, NPEC 2005, Kharagpur, India, pp 327-
332
npec055.pdf
34. ”Position Estimation of Solid-Liquid Boundary in a Linear Electromag-
netic Stirrer”, Proceedings of the 2nd National Power Electronics Confer-
ence, December 22 - 24, 2005, NPEC 2005, Kharagpur, India, pp 402-404
npec056.pdf
382 Publications
Appendix K
A Sample Innovation
The present trend in switched mode power supplies (SMPS) is to switch at high
switching frequencies to meet the increasing demands on high power density.
Switching frequencies in excess of 500 kHz are becoming standard.
S
IS
VS
VT
IP Load
D
IP
IS
t
tf
tr
VT
VS
t
i
( VT, IP )
IP
On Trajectory High Dissipation
Off Trajectory Point
v
VT
This results in high switching losses which are proportional to the switching
frequency.
Currently there are several families of such soft switching power converters.
K.2 Hard Switching Waveforms 385
These are classified as follows. Some of their respective salient features are
also listed here.
S
Ca IS
Sa VS
La
VT Da Va
IP Load
D
S
t
TD
Sa
t
Sa Ca
v(0) = VT VS
La
VT Da
i(0) = IP IP Load
The resonant process ends at the end of this interval T2 , when the resonant
capacitor voltage reaches zero causing the body diode of the active switch S
to become on. The interval T2 is given by
π q
T2 = L a Ca (K.7)
2
The equivalent circuit and the circuit waveforms in intervals T1 , T2 and there-
after are shown in Fig. 7. It may be noticed that the body diode of S has
Sa S
La
VT Da
IP Load
IP
iSa
t
T1 T2 T3
Consider now the auxiliary circuit with the dependent source Va a suitable
negative value. The equivalent circuit under this constraint is shown in Fig.
8. Under this constraint, it may be shown that the intervals T1 and T2 will be
S
Ca IS
Sa VS
La
VT Da Va < 0 in T1 IP Load
Va > 0 in T3 D
as follows.
Interval 1:
(VT + Va )
iSa (t) = (K.8)
La
End of interval T1 is when iSa = IP
IP La
T1 = (K.9)
VT + V a
Interval 2: s
CR
iSa (t) = IP + (VT + Va ) Sin(ωt) (K.10)
LR
vCa (t) = (VT + Va ) Cos(ωt) (K.11)
1
ω = √ (K.12)
La Ca
End of interval T2 is when vCa = Va
Va
ωT2 = Cos−1 − (K.13)
VT + V a
The valid solution for ωT2 is from the second quadrant. The qualitative change
in introducing the dependent voltage in the auxiliary circuit occurs following
390 A Sample Innovation
the interval T2 . The trapped energy in the auxiliary circuit inductor is recov-
ered into the auxiliary source Va . The complete commutation process is shown
in Figure 9 through the waveforms. With this auxiliary circuit, the turn-on
S
Ca IS
Sa VS
La
VT Da Va < 0 in T1 IP Load
Va > 0 in T3 D
iSa
t
T1 T2 T3
IP
T4
iS
t
0
S can be turned ON during T 4
under ZVS condition
process of the main switch S is at zero voltage. The turn-on and turn-off
process of the auxiliary switch Sa is under zero current. The turn-off process
of the main switch S is zero voltage (on account of the capacitor across the
switch during turn-off). In effect all the transitions are loss-less.
Ca IS S VS
Sa
La Vo
Da
VT
Va = −Vo in Interval T 1 IP
D Load
Va = − VT + Vo in Interval T 3
Ca IS S VS
Sa
La Vo
Da
VT
Va = −Vo in Interval T 1 IP
D Load
Va = + VT − Vo in Interval T 3
Sa t
T1 T2
T3
iS T4
t
S t
Figure K.11: The ZVS and ZCS Transitions in the Auxiliary Switch Circuit
1. Buck Converter:
L Vo
Vg D C R
S
Sa Da La
L L Vo
Vg Ca D C R
2. Boost Converter
Vo
D
L R
C
S
Vg
Vo
D
C
R
L L La
S Da
Vg Ca
Sa
3. Flyback Converter
D1 Vo
Vg C R
D1 Vo
Da La
Vg C R
Sa Ca S
4. Forward Converter
D1 L Vo
D2
Vg C R
D1 L Vo
Da La D2
Vg C R
Sa Ca S
5. Push-Pull Converter
D1 L Vo
Vg D2 C R
D1 L Vo
LR LR
DR CR CR DR
Vg D2 C R
SR SR
6. Cuk Converter
L1 C1 L2 Vo
Vg D1
S C2 R
L1 C1 L2 Vo
L1 La
Vg Da
S Ca Sa D1 C2 R
D1 L Vo
Vg
D2
C R
Sa Ca
S
Da La
D1 L Vo
Vg
D2
C R
Da La
Sa Ca S
Figure K.18: Two Switch Forward Converter and its ZVS Variant
K.6 Application to other circuits 399
8. Sepic Converter
L1 C1 D1 Vo
Vg L2
S C2 R
L1 C1 D1 Vo
L1 La
Vg Da L2
S Ca Sa C2 R
9. Half-Bridge Converter
Vg
S
D1 L Vo
Vg C R
D2
S
Vg Ca Sa
S Da
D1 L Vo
La
T
Vg C R
Da D2
S Ca Sa
S S
D1 L Vo
Vg
T C R
D2
S S
Ca Sa
S S Da
D1 L Vo
La
Vg T D2 C R
Da
S S Ca Sa
Vg
L Vo
C R
S1a C1a
S1
D1a La
L L Vo
D2a
S2
Vg S2a C2a C R
Vg
L One phase
of a motor
drive
S1a C1a
S1
D1a La
It is seen that the new soft switching circuit is applicable to every hard
switching converter. The performance is also identical in all the applications.
We see the mathematical analysis of the performance for a sample (buck) con-
verter.
Buck Converter (Commutation Process)
S
Sa Da La
L L Vo
Vg Ca D C R
Start of Commutation
Da La L 0 L Vo Vo
−Vo
Io
t= 0−
Vg Ca D C R
La 0 La
ISa −Vo I1 I2 ISa −Vo
Vg Ca D IR(T 1) = I o /2 Vg Ca V(T 2) = 2V g − Vo
IR(T 3) = 0
S
La L L
Vo
ISa 2Vg − Vo
Vg Ca C R
End of Commutation
S
L L
Vo
2Vg − Vo Io
Vg Ca C R
Interval 1:
(Vg + Vo ) VT (1 + d)
IR (t) = = (K.14)
LR LR
End of interval T1 is when IR = IP /2
IP LR
T1 = (K.15)
2VT (1 + d)
Interval 2: s
Ca IP
iSa (t) = VT (1 + d) Sin(ωt) + (K.16)
La 2
vCa (t) = VT − VT (1 + d) Cos(ωt) (K.17)
K.6 Application to other circuits 405
Sa t
ID Io
t
ISa Io /2
t
T1 T2 T3
IS
S
t
Vg
L Vo
D C R
Da La L L Vo
Sa
Vg D C R
Vo
Derive D
T2
C
R
L L La
S Da
Vg Ca
Sa
This puts a minimum on period limit on the main switching device in any
application. The control scheme shown in Fig. 30 may be used to overcome
this problem. The delay T2 may be set just before the instant the body diode
starts conducting. This serves the dual purpose of reducing the switching loss
close to zero and not getting the body diode of the main switch to conduct.
6. Different ratios of coupling to obtain the auxiliary source so that the reset
time of the auxiliary switch can be conveniently selected.
8. Adaptive delay schemes based on the device voltage prior to being turned
on. This makes the ZVS operation of circuit insensitive to operating pa-
rameters. Further it can be employed to prevent the body diode conduc-
tion prior to turn-on of the device.
K.10 References
1. Middlebrook, R. D., and Slobodan Cuk, Advances in Switched-Mode
Power Conversion, Volumes I and II, 2nd Edition, TESLAco, 1983.
9. Zhang, Y., Sen, P. C., and Liu, Y. F., ”A Novel Zero Voltage Switched
(ZVS) Buck Converter Using Coupled Inductor”, Canadian Conference
of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 2001, Vol. 1, pp. 357 -362.
10. Swaminathan, B., ”Resonant Transition Topologies for Push-Pull and
Half-Bridge DC to DC Converters”, M. Sc (Engg) Thesis, Indian Institute
of Science, Bangalore, May 2004.
11. Lakshminarasamma, N., Swaminathan, B., Ramanarayanan, V., ”A Uni-
fied Model for the ZVS DC to DC Converter with Active Clamp”, Proc.
Power Electronics Specialists Conferene. 2004 Record, pp 2441-2447.
12. da Silva Martins, M. L, and Hey, H. L., ”Self Commutated Auxiliary Cir-
cuit ZVT PWM Converters”, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics,
Vol. 19, No. 6, November 2004, pp 1435-1445.
13. Wang, C. M., ”Novel Zero-Voltage-Transition PWM DC-DC Converters”,
IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, Vol. 53, No. 1, February 2006,
pp 254-262.
410 A Sample Innovation
Appendix L
Data Sheets
HGTG30N120D2 IGBT
Ferrite Materials
Test Papers
World-Wide Links
http://www.newark.com
Newark Electronics
http://www.mouser.com
Mouser Electronics
http://www.vishay.com/power-ics/
Vishay Semiconductors
http://www.fujielectric.co.jp/eng/fdt/scd/
Fuji Electric
http://www.ixys.com/pinfo.html
IXYS Power Device
http://www.semicon.toshiba.co.jp/eng/index.html
Toshiba Semiconductors
http://www.st.com
ST Microelectronics
N.7 Sensors:
http://www.lem.com
LEM Current Sensors & Power Analyser Products
http://www.telcon.co.uk
Telcon Current Sensors
http://www.telcon.co.uk/FrameSet2.html
Telcon Magnetic Products
http://www.micronas.com/products/overview/sensors/index.php
Raw Hall Sensors
http://www.lakeshore.com/mag/hs/hsm.html
Hall Sensors
http://www.semicon.toshiba.co.jp/eng/prd/sensor/index.html
Sensors (Hall, Image. Photo)
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Lab/9643/TraceWidth.htm
PCB Track Width Calculator & Other Details of PCB Tracks
N.9 SMPS Technology Base: 421
http://users.telenet.be/educypedia/electronics/powerelectronics.htm
A Rich Source of Resources Across Several
Related Disciplines
http://www.drivesurvey.com/index home.html
An Internet Magazine for Industrial Drives
422 World-Wide Links
Bibliography
A C
active region, 14, 232 C, 137
ambient, 135 canonical circuit, 154
Ampere’s law, 49 canonical model, 154
ampere-sec integral, 104 capacitor, 47, 57
anti-parallel diode, 223 commutation, 60
area product, 54, 55 coupling, 57
audio susceptibility, 156 damping, 60
avalanche effect, 10 filter, 59
average current, 103 power, 58
averaged matrices, 156 pulse, 59
averaged model, 144 resonant, 62
averaging process, 143, 156 snubber, 60
cascaded, 180
B CCM, 117, 125, 135
baker clamp, 72 channel, 17
bandwidth, 180, 211 characteristic frequency, 167
base characteristic polynomial, 210
current, 296 chemical, 95
power, 296 circuit averaged model, 159
time, 296 circuit averaging, 237
voltage, 296 circuit topologies, ii
base drive, 14, 69 closed loop, 135
basic converters, 147 closed loop control, 179, 284
battery, 95 closed loop performance functions,
battery charger, 95 184
bi-directional, 117, 121, 124 command changes, 179
BJT, 18 common emitter gain, 99
black box, 136, 137 commutating di/dt, 13
blocking, 20 commutation process, 60
blocking loss, 6, 18, 24, 28 compensating ramp, 207
bode plot, 278 compensation ratio, 208
asymptotic, 280 compensator, 180
body diode, 17 compensator design, 214
boost converter, 152 compensator structure, 180
bridge rectifier, 230 complex conjugate pole-pair, 211
428 INDEX
T V
TDelay , 250 Vce (sat), 15
telecom, 35 Vgs (th), 17
temperature rise, 99 Vg , 136
test papers, 415 VT , VD , 137
thermal, 95 VA rating, 54
thermal conductivity, 30 variable frequency, 236
thermal impedance, 7, 13 visualisation, 305
thermal model, 28 volt-sec balance, 104
threshold voltage, 18, 26, 83 volt-sec integral, 104
thyristor, i, 9, 23 voltage doubler, 342
time invariant, 146 voltage gain, 124, 135
tolerance, 137 voltage loop, 209
topology, 96, 107, 237 voltage overshoot, 77
434 INDEX