Remaining Shelf-Life
Remaining Shelf-Life
Remaining Shelf-Life
1. Introduction 190
2. Scope 191
3. Glossary 191
4. The need for recommendations 193
5. Remaining shelf-life 194
References 196
Further reading 197
Appendix 1 Example of minimum remaining shelf-life of medical products 199
189
WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations Fifty-fourth report
1. Introduction
Following discussions relating to establishing a document for the remaining shelf-
life of medical products upon delivery, and considering the discussion between
the Interagency Pharmaceutical Coordination group (IPC) representatives, it was
decided to initiate a project to establish a document on remaining shelf-life for
procurement and supply of medical products.
The concept and project to establish such a document was also discussed
during the meeting of the Fifty-third Expert Committee on Specifications for
Pharmaceutical Products (ECSPP) in October 2018. It was noted that some
guidance documents were available from different procurement agencies. It was
agreed that the World Health Organization (WHO) would initiate the discussion
and preparation of a document, while following the WHO process for the
establishment of such a paper.
Information and policy on remaining shelf-life was collected from
different agencies and interested parties and a first draft document was prepared
after an informal discussion meeting in Geneva, Switzerland, in January 2019.
It was then agreed that the document should not cover only finished
pharmaceutical products but should be extended to also cover other products,
including, but not limited to, medical devices, vaccines and in vitro diagnostics
(IVD) products. (These products are collectively referred to as “medical products”
hereafter.)
A draft document was prepared and circulated to IPC members, as well
as other interested parties, inviting comments. The comments received were
reviewed during an informal discussion meeting in June 2019 and the draft
document was updated.
The aims of this document are:
■■ to facilitate the national authorization of importation of medical
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1025, 2020
2. Scope
The principles contained in this document should be applied to medical products
in the supply chain. This includes donated products (1).
This document focuses on remaining shelf-life and does not address
details contained in other guidelines, guides and agreements between different
parties in the supply chain.
As “kits” are made up of different products, and owing to certain
specifics related to the shelf-life of kits, these are not included in the scope of
this guideline. The principles contained in this guideline may, however, be used
in considering the remaining shelf-life of items in a kit, as the expiry date of the
kit can be short because of a specific product in the kit.
All stakeholders, including national regulatory authorities, manufacturers,
suppliers, donors and recipients, should consider the recommendations on
remaining shelf-life contained in this document.
3. Glossary
The definitions given below are taken from existing WHO guidelines, where
available, or alternatively from other recognized guidelines.
batch. A defined quantity of starting material, packaging material or product,
processed in a single process or series of processes, so that it is expected to be
homogeneous. It may sometimes be necessary to divide a batch into a number of
sub-batches, which are later brought together to form a final homogeneous batch.
In the case of terminal sterilization, the batch size is determined by the capacity
of the autoclave. In continuous manufacture, the batch must correspond to a
defined fraction of the production, characterized by its intended homogeneity.
The batch size can be defined either as a fixed quantity or as the amount produced
in a fixed time interval.
consignment (or delivery). The quantity of a medical product(s), made by one
manufacturer and supplied at one time in response to a particular request or
order. A consignment may comprise one or more packages or containers and
may include material belonging to more than one batch.
191
WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations Fifty-fourth report
expiry date (or expiration date). The date placed on the container or labels of
a medical product designating the time during which it is expected to remain
within established shelf-life specifications if stored under defined conditions, and
after which it should not be used.
manufacturer (IVD). Any natural or legal person with responsibility for design
and/or manufacture of an IVD product with the intention of making it available
for use, under his or her name, whether or not such an IVD product is designed
and/or manufactured by that person him- or herself or on his or her behalf by
(an)other person(s).
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1025, 2020
medical product. Products including, but not limited to, finished pharmaceutical
products, medical devices, vaccines and IVD products.
remaining shelf-life. Defined as the period remaining, from the date upon
delivery, to the expiry date, retest date, install by date or other use before date
established by the manufacturer.
retest date. The date when a material should be re-examined to ensure that it is
still suitable for use.
shelf-life. The period of time, from the date of manufacture, that a product is
expected to remain within its approved product specification while handled and
stored under defined conditions.
upon delivery. The date the medical product is delivered as specified, e.g. at the
port, at the point in country after customs clearance, or at the end-user – and as
defined in the agreement between relevant parties.
193
WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations Fifty-fourth report
5. Remaining shelf-life
Note: The manufacturing date of a medical product should be defined by the
manufacturer and be provided, if requested.
5.1 Principles
Decisions on remaining shelf-life for medical products should be defined
realistically, contextualized and adapted to each importer, following a thorough
risk assessment taking into account the criteria on page 195. It should be defined
and be based on relevant factors, including but not limited to the category and
type of product; inventory level; manufacturing and transit lead time; local
release lead time; storage condition; delivery chain; and resources in the recipient
country or region.
There should be agreements between suppliers, purchasers and recipients
covering the relevant responsibilities of each party, including remaining shelf-
life or expiry date.
Products should be transported, received, stored and distributed in
accordance with WHO Good storage and distribution practices (3). Special
attention should be given to temperature-, light- and moisture-sensitive products.
Products supplied by the manufacturer or supplier should meet the
policy of national government and the recommendations in terms of remaining
shelf-life prescribed in this document.
Products should be appropriately labelled. The label should include the
expiry, retest or install by date, as appropriate. Products with an “install by” date
should be installed prior to the date specified by the supplier.
Products received should be scrutinized in an attempt to identify possible
substandard and falsified products. It should be ensured that, for example, the
expiry date is not falsified (7).
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1025, 2020
Where different periods for remaining shelf-life have been defined for
products, recipients should ensure that the products meet the remaining shelf-
life requirement for the intended destination, e.g. central warehouse, regional
warehouse, testing site or user point.
National authorization for importation, where required, should be
obtained based on the available information, including the expiry date of the
product, to allow for calculation of the remaining shelf-life and to assist in
expediting approval.
Where so justified, suppliers, recipients and national authorities may
negotiate deviations from the policy for remaining shelf-life, provided that:
■■ where the remaining shelf-life is shorter than stipulated in the policy,
it is ensured that the stock will be consumed prior to expiry; and
194
Annex 8
5.3 Retesting
Where a manufacturer or supplier has obtained approval from an NRA for a new
or extended shelf-life, this may be applied.
Products with an expiry date should not be subjected to retesting
by the purchaser or recipient for the purpose of extension of shelf-life. Only
in exceptional cases, such as product shortages, should a recipient consider
extending the expiry date of received batches, subject to certain conditions, such
as availability of scientific data, the application of risk management principles,
and NRA approval. The new expiry date should be reflected on the packaging.
Products with a retest date allocated by a manufacturer, e.g. chemicals
and reagents, may be retested and used if the quality parameters are met.
An illustrative example of recommended remaining shelf-life of products
is given in Appendix 1.
References
1. Interagency guidelines. Guidelines for medicines donations, 3rd ed. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2011 (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/44647/9789241501989_
eng.pdf?sequence=1, accessed 18 November 2019).
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1025, 2020
2. Stability testing of active pharmaceutical ingredients and finished pharmaceutical products. In:
WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: fifty-second report.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018: Annex 10 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1010;
http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s23498en/s23498en.pdf, accessed 18 November
2019).
3. Good storage and distribution practices for medical products. In: WHO Expert Committee
on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: fifty-fourth report. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2020: Annex 7 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1025).
4. Model quality assurance system for procurement agencies. In: WHO Expert Committee on
Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: forty-eighth report. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2014: Annex 3 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 986; http://apps.who.int/
medicinedocs/documents/s21492en/s21492en.pdf, accessed 18 November 2019).
5. The International Pharmacopoeia, 9th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 (https://
apps.who.int/phint/en/p/docf/, accessed 4 November 2019).
196
Annex 8
6. The International Council for Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for
Human Use (https://www.ich.org/, accessed 18 November 2019).
7. WHO guidance on testing of “suspect” falsified medicines. In: WHO Expert Committee on
Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: fifty-second report. Geneva: World Health
Organization; 2018: Annex 5 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1010; http://apps.who.int/
medicinedocs/documents/s23452en/s23452en.pdf, accessed 18 November 2019).
Further reading
■■ WHO good manufacturing practices for pharmaceutical products: main principles. In: WHO
Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: forty-eighth report.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014: Annex 2 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 986;
https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_assurance/TRS986annex2.pdf,
accessed 15 November 2019).
■■ WHO guidelines for sampling of pharmaceutical products and related materials. In: WHO Expert
Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: thirty-ninth report. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2005: Annex 4 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 929; https://apps.who.
int/medicinedocs/documents/s21440en/s21440en.pdf, accessed 18 November 2019).
■■ Guidance on good practices for pharmaceutical quality control laboratories. In: WHO Expert
Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: forty-fourth report. Geneva: World
Health Organization; 2010: Annex 1 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 957; https://www.who.
int/medicines/areas/quality_safety/quality_assurance/GoodpracticesPharmaceuticalQuality
ControlLaboratoriesTRS957Annex1.pdf, accessed 17 November 2019).
■■ Model guidance for the storage and transport of time-and temperature-sensitive pharmaceutical
products. In: WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: forty-fifth
report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011: Annex 9 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 961;
http://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s18683en/s18683en.pdf, accessed 18 November
2019).
■■ WHO guidelines on quality risk management. In: WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for
Pharmaceutical Preparations: forty-seventh report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013:
Annex 2 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 981; https://www.who.int/medicines/areas/quality_
safety/quality_assurance/Annex2TRS-981.pdf, accessed 18 November 2019).
■■ Technical supplements to Model guidance for storage and transport of time- and temperature-
sensitive pharmaceutical products. (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 961, 2011), Annex 9. In:
WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: forty-ninth report.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015: Annex 5 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 992; https://
apps.who.int/medicinedocs/documents/s21896en/s21896en.pdf, accessed 18 November 2019).
■■ WHO Good manufacturing practices for biological products. In: WHO Expert Committee on
Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations: fiftieth report. Geneva: World Health Organization;
2016: Annex 3 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 996; https://apps.who.int/medicinedocs/
documents/s22400en/s22400en.pdf, accessed 18 November 2019).
■■ Guidance for procurement of in vitro diagnostics and related laboratory items and equipment.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017 (https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/
255577/9789241512558-eng.pdf?sequence=1, accessed 18 November 2019).
197
WHO Expert Committee on Specifications for Pharmaceutical Preparations Fifty-fourth report
■■ Technical Guidance Series (TGS) for WHO Prequalification Diagnostic Assessment. TGS2:
Establishing stability of in vitro diagnostic medical devices. In: WHO Expert Committee on
Biological Standardization: sixty-eighth report. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018: Annex
5 (WHO/BS/2017.2304 Rev. 1; WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1011; https://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/handle/10665/259742/WHO-BS-2017.2304-eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 18 November
2019).
■■ Technical Guidance Series (TGS) for WHO Prequalification Diagnostic Assessment. Annex
to TGS2: Establishing component stability for in vitro diagnostic medical devices. Geneva:
World Health Organization; 2019 (WHO/MVP/EMP/RHT/PQT/2019.03; https://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/handle/10665/311345/WHO-MVP-EMP-RHT-PQT-2019.03-eng.pdf?ua=1, accessed 18
November 2019).
■■ ISO 23640:2011(en). In vitro diagnostic medical devices – evaluation of stability of in vitro
diagnostic reagents (https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso:23640:ed-1:v1:en, accessed 18
November 2019).
■■ EP25-A: Evaluation of stability of in vitro diagnostic reagents; approved guideline. Wayne (PA):
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2009 (https://clsi.org/media/1424/ep25a_sample.
pdf, accessed 18 November 2019).
WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1025, 2020
198
Annex 8
Appendix 1
Example of minimum remaining shelf-life of medical
products
Note: The total shelf-life of a product is based on results from testing during
stability (and, where relevant, sterility) studies under specified conditions. The
storage and transport conditions stipulated by the manufacturer should be
followed, to ensure the product quality is maintained.
Table A8.1
Example of the minimum remaining shelf-life (RSL; at the time of dispatch and upon
delivery) of medical products, based on the outcome of risk assessment
199