The "Hannibal Directive" (sometimes called the "Hannibal

Protocol") is an unofficial Israeli military protocol, developed

in the mid-1980s, designed to prevent Israeli soldiers from being
captured by enemy forces. The protocol encourages extreme
measures, including potentially lethal force, to stop an
abduction—even if it risks the lives of the soldiers being taken.
This policy was created following a 1985 prisoner exchange where
hundreds of Palestinian prisoners were released in exchange for a
few captured Israeli soldiers, which was viewed as a costly deal
for Israel.
The directive is controversial because it prioritizes preventing
the capture of soldiers at any cost, with critics arguing that it
essentially permits soldiers to kill their own comrades to avoid
them becoming hostages. It has been invoked in several notable
incidents, such as during the Second Lebanon War and in
operations against Hamas in Gaza. Although the Israeli military
denies having an official policy of killing captured soldiers,
testimonies and investigations suggest that the directive has
been applied in various operations, often leading to heavy fire
or airstrikes in attempts to prevent soldiers from being taken
alive.
Despite its secrecy, the Hannibal Directive remains a subject of
debate, particularly regarding its legal and ethical implications
in military conduct. Some Israeli commanders have expressed
concern over its unofficial, sometimes dangerous, interpretations
on the battlefield.

Se ha buscado 6 sitios
The "Samson Doctrine" or "Samson Option" is a concept rooted in
Israel's nuclear deterrence strategy. It is named after the
biblical figure Samson, who, when captured by the Philistines,
brought down a temple upon himself and his enemies, symbolizing a
"doomsday" response when faced with existential defeat.
In the context of Israel's security strategy, the Samson Option
refers to the potential use of nuclear weapons as a last-resort
measure if the state's survival is at risk. This approach
emphasizes deterrence, aiming to prevent catastrophic attacks by
signaling that, if Israel were to face annihilation, it would
retaliate massively, potentially causing widespread destruction
to its aggressors. Though Israel officially maintains a policy of
"nuclear opacity," the existence of its nuclear arsenal is widely
1
believed, and the Samson Option serves as an extreme form of
deterrence against existential threats(
Modern War Institute
)(
Algemeiner
)(
The Street Vendors Institute

The assertion that Israel is seeking a regional war and is

provoking Muslims through bombings and massacres reflects a
controversial perspective, often voiced by critics of Israeli
policy. Israel’s military actions, particularly against groups
like Hamas in Gaza or Hezbollah in Lebanon, are frequently
defended by the Israeli government as self-defense against rocket
attacks, terror threats, and attempts to infiltrate its borders.
However, these actions often result in significant civilian
casualties, leading to international criticism and accusations of
disproportionate force.
For instance, in recent conflicts, Israeli airstrikes on Gaza,
often in retaliation for rocket fire, have led to heavy
casualties, including among civilians. The Israeli military
argues that it takes steps to minimize civilian harm, such as
warning civilians before strikes, but critics argue that the
scale of destruction in densely populated areas amounts to
collective punishment(
Modern War Institute
)(
The Street Vendors Institute
).
The broader context of these military operations is shaped by
long-standing tensions between Israel and various Muslim-majority
nations and groups, particularly in the context of the Israeli-
Palestinian conflict. Issues such as Israeli settlements in the
West Bank, the status of Jerusalem, and the ongoing blockade of
Gaza further inflame tensions. Many Arab and Muslim critics view
these policies as provocations, while Israel maintains that they
are necessary for its security.

2
It's important to recognize that views on this topic are highly
polarized, and perspectives vary significantly depending on
political, religious, and regional viewpoints.
“I mean to show you of my strength, yet greater; As with amaze
shall strike all who behold. This uttered, straining all his
nerves he bowed; As with the force of winds and waters pent When
mountains tremble, these two massy pillars With horrible
convulsion to and fro He tugged, he struck, till down they came
and drew The whole roof after them, with burst of thunder Upon
the heads of all who sat beneath.” John Milton, Samson Agonistes
The passage you are referring to comes from John Milton's Samson
Agonistes, a dramatic poem that tells the story of Samson, a
biblical figure, in his final moments of defiance. The excerpt
describes the moment when Samson, having regained his strength,
pulls down the pillars of the Philistine temple, killing himself
along with his captors. Milton's vivid imagery and intense
language capture the power and determination of Samson,
symbolizing his ultimate act of resistance.
If you'd like, I can help you analyze this passage or provide a
summary of the work's themes and structure!

The passage from Samson Agonistes by John Milton captures the

climactic moment when Samson brings down the Philistine temple,
killing himself and his enemies. Here's a breakdown of key themes
and literary elements:
Themes
1. Strength and Defiance: Samson’s decision to destroy the
temple, despite knowing it will result in his own death, is
an act of defiance against his captors. His restored
physical strength symbolizes divine intervention and his
unyielding faith.
2. Tragedy and Heroism: Milton portrays Samson as a tragic
hero. His final act, while devastating, is also his
redemption, as he sacrifices himself for a greater cause,
echoing the theme of martyrdom.
3. Divine Justice: The destruction of the temple is not just a
personal act of vengeance, but one that signifies divine
judgment on the Philistines. This theme of divine justice

3
 runs throughout Milton’s works, often emphasizing God’s will
being enacted through human agents.
Literary Devices
1. Imagery: Milton uses vivid and powerful imagery, comparing
Samson’s destruction to “winds and waters pent” and the
“convulsion” of the earth, which gives the scene a
catastrophic, almost apocalyptic tone.
2. Epic Tone: The elevated language, with phrases like "burst
of thunder" and "horrible convulsion," is characteristic of
Milton’s epic style, which he famously employed in Paradise
Lost.
3. Symbolism: The temple's collapse represents the downfall of
the Philistines and their culture, while also symbolizing
Samson’s ultimate rejection of his enemies' power over him.
In summary, this passage exemplifies Samson's tragic heroism,
using powerful imagery and symbolism to convey themes of divine
justice, strength, and sacrifice. Milton’s portrayal emphasizes
the gravity of Samson’s final act as one of both destruction and
redemption.
Would you like to explore more themes or elements from Samson
Agonistes?
In Samson Agonistes, John Milton explores several profound themes
in addition to strength, defiance, and divine justice. Here’s a
deeper look at some of the other major themes and literary
elements within the work:
1. Blindness and Inner Vision
Milton himself was blind when he wrote Samson Agonistes, and the
theme of physical blindness appears in the character of Samson.
However, blindness is also symbolic of Samson's earlier spiritual
blindness or moral failing. As Samson reflects on his past
mistakes, Milton explores how the loss of sight enhances inner
vision, leading Samson to a deeper understanding of his divine
purpose and redemption.
 Samson’s Physical Blindness: Blinded by the Philistines
after being betrayed by Delilah, Samson’s physical condition
represents his humiliation and loss of power.
 Inner Vision: As Samson is left to reflect on his life and
failures, Milton presents blindness as a pathway to insight,

4
 symbolizing spiritual awakening and redemption. Samson, in
his blindness, comes to terms with his role as a servant of
God, recognizing that true power lies in faith and divine
will.
2. Freedom and Servitude
The concept of freedom is examined both in the literal sense of
Samson's captivity and in a broader, philosophical sense
regarding human agency.
 Captivity: Samson's literal imprisonment by the Philistines
parallels his metaphorical imprisonment in a cycle of sin,
temptation, and weakness.
 Freedom through Submission to God: Milton emphasizes that
true freedom comes through obedience to God. Samson’s final
act of destruction, in which he submits to God’s will, frees
him from his earthly chains, both physically and
spiritually. It’s through this act of surrender to God’s
plan that Samson regains his strength.
3. Tragic Heroism and Sacrifice
Samson is portrayed as a tragic hero, a figure who falls due to
his own flaws but achieves redemption through his ultimate
sacrifice.
 Tragic Hero: Samson’s downfall is caused by his own hubris,
desire for vengeance, and his earlier moral failings,
particularly his susceptibility to Delilah’s deceit.
Milton’s portrayal aligns with the classical idea of a
tragic hero whose greatness is undermined by personal flaws.
 Sacrifice: Despite his tragic fall, Samson’s self-
sacrificial destruction of the Philistine temple is a form
of redemption. He dies in the process, but his death is
framed as a triumph over his enemies and a fulfillment of
divine justice, cementing his role as a martyr.
4. Divine Providence
A key theme in Samson Agonistes is the role of divine providence,
or the idea that God’s will governs all events. Milton presents
Samson’s suffering and downfall as part of a larger divine plan.
 God’s Will: Samson’s journey from disgrace to redemption is
portrayed as being orchestrated by God. Even though Samson
has been broken physically and spiritually, Milton shows

5
 that God's will operates through human weakness to bring
about divine justice.
 Acceptance of Fate: By the end of the poem, Samson comes to
accept his fate as part of God’s greater plan, aligning his
personal desires with divine providence. His final act is
motivated by his faith in God’s purpose, rather than
personal revenge.
5. Power and Weakness
The interplay of power and weakness is central to the poem.
Samson’s physical might is contrasted with his moments of
vulnerability, particularly when he is deceived by Delilah and
during his time in captivity.
 Physical vs. Moral Power: Milton contrasts Samson’s physical
strength with his moral and spiritual weakness, especially
in his early life when he falls prey to pride and lust. His
eventual realization of God’s power restores him, showing
that true strength comes from faith.
 Strength through Weakness: In the end, Samson’s greatest
moment of power comes not from his physical strength alone
but from his spiritual submission to God’s will. It is
through this weakness—his submission—that he becomes an
instrument of divine justice.
Literary Elements
 Chorus: Samson Agonistes is modeled after Greek tragedy,
with the use of a Chorus to comment on the action, reflect
moral judgments, and express collective wisdom. This
structure gives the poem a classical, tragic feel while
allowing Milton to explore moral and philosophical
questions.
 Soliloquy and Dialogue: The inner conflict of Samson is
brought out through soliloquies and dialogue, where he
reflects on his life and struggles. This introspective
approach emphasizes his emotional and spiritual journey.
Conclusion
Milton’s Samson Agonistes is rich with complex themes and
powerful symbolism, ranging from personal redemption and divine
justice to themes of power, weakness, and sacrifice. The tragic
arc of Samson’s character highlights both his human flaws and his

6
ultimate divine purpose, encapsulating Milton’s worldview that
redemption and strength come through faith and submission to
God’s will.
If you'd like to explore any specific theme or section of the
work in more detail, feel free to ask!