Kinetics
Kinetics
N2 O5 NO2 O2 total
amount n(1 − α) 2αn 1
2αn n 1 + 32 α
How do we monitor the progress of a reaction?
Monitor quantities that change during the reaction
If at least one component is a gas, we can monitor the change in pressure.
Example:
2N2 O5 (g) → 4NO2 (g)+O2 (g)
Let initial pressure=p0
initial amount of N2 O5 = n mols
at time t , degree of dissociation =α
N2 O5 NO2 O2 total
amount n(1 − α) 2αn 1
2α n n 1 + 32 α
When α = 0, p = p0 ∴ at time t , p (t ) = 1 + 32 α p0
real-time-analysis: ow technique
J
J,0
J
J,0
J
J,0
J
J,0
J
J,0
J
J,0
[Ar] : (a) 1 mmol dm−3 (b) 5 mmol dm−3 and (c) 10 mmol dm−3
Method of initial rates:
Recombination of I atoms in the gas phase in the presence of Ar,
2 I(g) + Ar(g)→ I2 (g) + Ar(g); v0 = k [A]a0 =⇒ log v0 = log k + a log [A]0
[Ar] : (a) 1 mmol dm−3 (b) 5 mmol dm−3 and (c) 10 mmol dm−3
[Ar] : (a) 1 mmol dm−3 (b) 5 mmol dm−3 and (c) 10 mmol dm−3
time constant, τ = k1
integrated rate law: Zero- order rxn
integrated rate law: Zero- order rxn
d [A] = −k [A]0 = −k
dt
integrated rate law: Zero- order rxn
d [A] = −k [A]0 = −k
dt
[A] = [A]0 − kt
1st order rxn
1st order rxn
d [A] = −k [A]
dt
1st order rxn
d [A] = −k [A]
dt
[A] = [A]0 e −kt
CH3 N2 CH3 (g)→ CH3 CH3 (g)+N2 (g)
t/s 0 1000 2000 3000 4000
p/Pa 10.9 7.63 5.32 3.71 2.59
second-order:
second-order:
d [A] = −k [A]2
dt
second-order:
d [A] = −k [A]2
dt
[A] − [A]0 = kt
1 1
second-order:
d [A] = −k [A]2
dt
[A] − [A]0 = kt
1 1
[A]0
[ A] = 1+kt [A]0
klarge = 3ksmall
(grey lines for rst order)
half life for second order reaction: t = k [A1 ]
1
2 0
half life for second order reaction: t = k [A1 ]
1
2 0
A
[ ]0
Statistics of Birth-Death processes applied to chemical kinetics :
Statistics of Birth-Death processes applied to chemical kinetics :
Consider a rst order decay process,
Statistics of Birth-Death processes applied to chemical kinetics :
Consider a rst order decay process,
probability that at time we have n molecules at time t : Pn (t )
Statistics of Birth-Death processes applied to chemical kinetics :
Consider a rst order decay process,
probability that at time we have n molecules at time t : Pn (t )
Transition probability of going from n to n − 1 molecules in time ∆t :
Wn,n−1 = kn∆t
Statistics of Birth-Death processes applied to chemical kinetics :
Consider a rst order decay process,
probability that at time we have n molecules at time t : Pn (t )
Transition probability of going from n to n − 1 molecules in time ∆t :
Wn,n−1 = kn∆t
In time ∆t , the state of n + 1 molecules may become the state of n molecules with
probability Pn+1 (t )Wn+1,n
Statistics of Birth-Death processes applied to chemical kinetics :
Consider a rst order decay process,
probability that at time we have n molecules at time t : Pn (t )
Transition probability of going from n to n − 1 molecules in time ∆t :
Wn,n−1 = kn∆t
In time ∆t , the state of n + 1 molecules may become the state of n molecules with
probability Pn+1 (t )Wn+1,n
and the state of n molecules may become the state of n − 1 molecules with
probability Pn (t )Wn,n−1
Statistics of Birth-Death processes applied to chemical kinetics :
Consider a rst order decay process,
probability that at time we have n molecules at time t : Pn (t )
Transition probability of going from n to n − 1 molecules in time ∆t :
Wn,n−1 = kn∆t
In time ∆t , the state of n + 1 molecules may become the state of n molecules with
probability Pn+1 (t )Wn+1,n
and the state of n molecules may become the state of n − 1 molecules with
probability Pn (t )Wn,n−1
∴ Pn (t + ∆t ) = Pn (t ) + Pn+1 (t )Wn+1,n − Pn (t )Wn,n−1 (no term containing
Wn,n+1 because it is a decay, n → n + 1not possible)
Statistics of Birth-Death processes applied to chemical kinetics :
Consider a rst order decay process,
probability that at time we have n molecules at time t : Pn (t )
Transition probability of going from n to n − 1 molecules in time ∆t :
Wn,n−1 = kn∆t
In time ∆t , the state of n + 1 molecules may become the state of n molecules with
probability Pn+1 (t )Wn+1,n
and the state of n molecules may become the state of n − 1 molecules with
probability Pn (t )Wn,n−1
∴ Pn (t + ∆t ) = Pn (t ) + Pn+1 (t )Wn+1,n − Pn (t )Wn,n−1 (no term containing
Wn,n+1 because it is a decay, n → n + 1not possible)
or, Pn (t + ∆t ) = Pn (t ) + Pn+1 (t )k (n + 1)∆t − Pn (t )kn∆t
Statistics of Birth-Death processes applied to chemical kinetics :
Consider a rst order decay process,
probability that at time we have n molecules at time t : Pn (t )
Transition probability of going from n to n − 1 molecules in time ∆t :
Wn,n−1 = kn∆t
In time ∆t , the state of n + 1 molecules may become the state of n molecules with
probability Pn+1 (t )Wn+1,n
and the state of n molecules may become the state of n − 1 molecules with
probability Pn (t )Wn,n−1
∴ Pn (t + ∆t ) = Pn (t ) + Pn+1 (t )Wn+1,n − Pn (t )Wn,n−1 (no term containing
Wn,n+1 because it is a decay, n → n + 1not possible)
or, Pn (t + ∆t ) = Pn (t ) + Pn+1 (t )k (n + 1)∆t − Pn (t )kn∆t
or, P˙n = Pn (t +∆∆tt)−Pn (t ) = k (n + 1)Pn+1 (t ) − knPn (t ) ∀ n = 1, · · · , n0 − 1
Statistics of Birth-Death processes applied to chemical kinetics :
Consider a rst order decay process,
probability that at time we have n molecules at time t : Pn (t )
Transition probability of going from n to n − 1 molecules in time ∆t :
Wn,n−1 = kn∆t
In time ∆t , the state of n + 1 molecules may become the state of n molecules with
probability Pn+1 (t )Wn+1,n
and the state of n molecules may become the state of n − 1 molecules with
probability Pn (t )Wn,n−1
∴ Pn (t + ∆t ) = Pn (t ) + Pn+1 (t )Wn+1,n − Pn (t )Wn,n−1 (no term containing
Wn,n+1 because it is a decay, n → n + 1not possible)
or, Pn (t + ∆t ) = Pn (t ) + Pn+1 (t )k (n + 1)∆t − Pn (t )kn∆t
or, P˙n = Pn (t +∆∆tt)−Pn (t ) = k (n + 1)Pn+1 (t ) − knPn (t ) ∀ n = 1, · · · , n0 − 1
This is a dierential-dierence equation (also called a master equation) with the
1 if n = n0
initial condition Pn (0) =
0 if n ̸= n0
For n = n0 ,
For n = n0 ,
eqn. becomes, Ṗn = −kn0 Pn (t ) with the initial condition Pn (0) = 1
0 0 0
For n = n0 ,
eqn. becomes, Ṗn = −kn0 Pn (t ) with the initial condition Pn (0) = 1
soln. : Pn (t ) = e −kn t Pn (0) = e −kn t
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
For n = n0 ,
eqn. becomes, Ṗn = −kn0 Pn (t ) with the initial condition Pn (0) = 1
soln. : Pn (t ) = e −kn t Pn (0) = e −kn t
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
Pn −1 (0) = 0
0
For n = n0 ,
eqn. becomes, Ṗn = −kn0 Pn (t ) with the initial condition Pn (0) = 1
soln. : Pn (t ) = e −kn t Pn (0) = e −kn t
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
Pn −1 (0) = 0
0
Pn −1 (0) = 0
0
e at ẏ (t ) = −ay (t )e at + f (t )e at
or dtd (e at y ) = f (t )e at
Rt
∴ e at y (t ) − y (0) = f (t )e at dt
0
For n = n0 ,
eqn. becomes, Ṗn = −kn0 Pn (t ) with the initial condition Pn (0) = 1
soln. : Pn (t ) = e −kn t Pn (0) = e −kn t
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
Pn −1 (0) = 0
0
e at ẏ (t ) = −ay (t )e at + f (t )e at
or dtd (e at y ) = f (t )e at
Rt
∴ e at y (t ) − y (0) = f (t )e at dt
0
e at ≡ e k (n −1)t andt
0
Rt Rt
f (t )e at dt ≡ kn0 e −kn t e k (n −1)t dt = kn0 e −kt dt = n0 1 − e −kt
R
0 0
0 0 0
For n = n0 ,
eqn. becomes, Ṗn = −kn0 Pn (t ) with the initial condition Pn (0) = 1
soln. : Pn (t ) = e −kn t Pn (0) = e −kn t
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
Pn −1 (0) = 0
0
e at ẏ (t ) = −ay (t )e at + f (t )e at
or dtd (e at y ) = f (t )e at
Rt
∴ e at y (t ) − y (0) = f (t )e at dt
0
e at ≡ e k (n −1)t andt
0
Rt Rt
f (t )e at dt ≡ kn0 e −kn t e k (n −1)t dt = kn0 e −kt dt = n0 1 − e −kt
R
0 0
0 0 0
∴ e k (n −1)t Pn t ) − Pn −1 (0) = n0 1 − e −kt with the initial condition
−1 (
0
0 0
Pn −1 (0) = 0
0
For n = n0 ,
eqn. becomes, Ṗn = −kn0 Pn (t ) with the initial condition Pn (0) = 1
soln. : Pn (t ) = e −kn t Pn (0) = e −kn t
0 0 0
0 0
0 0
Pn −1 (0) = 0
0
e at ẏ (t ) = −ay (t )e at + f (t )e at
or dtd (e at y ) = f (t )e at
Rt
∴ e at y (t ) − y (0) = f (t )e at dt
0
e at ≡ e k (n −1)t andt
0
Rt Rt
f (t )e at dt ≡ kn0 e −kn t e k (n −1)t dt = kn0 e −kt dt = n0 1 − e −kt
R
0 0
0 0 0
∴ e k (n −1)t Pn −1 (t ) − Pn −1 (0) = n0 1 − e −kt with the initial condition
0
0 0
Pn −1 (0) = 0
0
n −1
or, Pn −1 (t ) = n0 e −kt 1 − e −kt
0
0
Similarly, for n = n0 − 2, Ṗn 0 −2 = k (n0 − 1)Pn 0 −1 ( t ) − k (n0 − 2)Pn −2 (t )
0
Similarly, for n = n0 − 2, Ṗn −2 = k (n0 − 1)Pn −1 (t ) − k (n0 − 2)Pn −2 (t )
0 0
n −1 0
n
Similarly, for n = n0 − 2, Ṗn −2 = k (n0 − 1)Pn −1 (t ) − k (n0 − 2)Pn −2 (t )
0
n −1
0 0
0 0
n
n n n0
n n −n
⟨n⟩(t ) = nPn = n e −kt 1 − e −kt = e −kt n0
0 0
0
P P
0 0 n
Similarly, for n = n0 − 2, Ṗn −2 = k (n0 − 1)Pn −1 (t ) − k (n0 − 2)Pn −2 (t )
0
n −1 0 0
0 0
n
n n n0
n n −n
⟨n⟩(t ) = nPn = n e −kt 1 − e −kt = e −kt n0
0 0
0
P P
0 0 n
m m
[using p a p b m −p =
P
0 p
mP
−1
(m−1)!
ma (p −1)!{(m−1)−(p −1)})! ap−1 b{(m−1)−(p−1)} = ma(a + b)m−1 and a + b = 1]
p−1=0
Note : 1. The choice of the transition probability Wn,n−1 is a trick. When we
know it is a rst order reaction, we x it as kn∆t . What should it be for a zeroth
order or second order reaction?
Note : 1. The choice of the transition probability Wn,n−1 is a trick. When we
know it is a rst order reaction, we x it as kn∆t . What should it be for a zeroth
order or second order reaction?
2. We could have obtained the nal result above by starting from rst order decay,
such that the probability of a molecule remaining unreacted after time t is e −kt
and not reacting is 1 − e −kt n
=⇒ the probability of n molecules remaining unreacted after time t is e −kt and
n −n
not reacting is 1 − e −kt 0
3. The variance = n0 e −kt (1 − e −kt )
m m ap bm−p a+==
b =1
[using p2 m(m − 1)a2 + ma
P
p=0 p
3. The variance = n0 e −kt (1 − e −kt )
m m ap bm−p a+==
b =1
[using p2 m(m − 1)a2 + ma
P
p=0 p
standard
√ deviation, ∆ = σt2 = n0 e −kt (1 − e −kt ) and
p p
∆ n0 e kt (1−e −kt )
−
√1
⟨n ⟩ = e −kt n0 ∝ n 0
3. The variance = n0 e −kt (1 − e −kt )
m m ap bm−p a+==
b =1
[using p2 m(m − 1)a2 + ma
P
p=0 p
standard
√ deviation, ∆ = σt2 = n0 e −kt (1 − e −kt ) and
p p
∆ n0 e kt (1−e −kt )
−
√1
⟨n ⟩ = e −kt n0 ∝ n 0
i.e., the larger the number of molecules, the relative deviation from the mean will
be smaller. This is why the phenomenological results work - at the macroscopic
level, the deviation is negligible.
4. The assumption that the transition is occurring in a single step from n to n − 1
and not to n − 2 is tantamount to Markovian statistics.