3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.

0 (2017-03)
Technical Report

3rd Generation Partnership Project;

Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network;
Spatial channel model for
Multiple Input Multiple Output (MIMO) simulations
(Release 14)

The present document has been developed within the 3 rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP TM) and may be further elaborated for the purposes of 3GPP.
The present document has not been subject to any approval process by the 3GPP Organizational Partners and shall not be implemented.
This Specification is provided for future development work within 3GPP only. The Organizational Partners accept no liability for any use of this Specification.
Specifications and reports for implementation of the 3GPP TM system should be obtained via the 3GPP Organizational Partners' Publications Offices.
Release 14 2 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Keywords
UMTS, radio, antenna

3GPP

Postal address

3GPP support office address

650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis
Valbonne - FRANCE
Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16

Internet
http://www.3gpp.org

Copyright Notification

No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.

The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.

© 2017, 3GPP Organizational Partners (ARIB, ATIS, CCSA, ETSI, TSDSI, TTA, TTC).
All rights reserved.

UMTS™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its members
3GPP™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
LTE™ is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners
GSM® and the GSM logo are registered and owned by the GSM Association

3GPP
Release 14 3 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Contents
Foreword ...................................................................................................................................................... 4
1 Scope .................................................................................................................................................. 5
2 References .......................................................................................................................................... 5
3 Definitions, symbols and abbreviations ............................................................................................... 6
3.1 Definitions ................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.2 Symbols ....................................................................................................................................................... 6
3.3 Abbreviations............................................................................................................................................... 6
4 Spatial channel model for calibration purposes .................................................................................... 6
4.1 Purpose ........................................................................................................................................................ 6
4.2 Link level channel model parameter summary .............................................................................................. 7
4.3 Spatial parameters per path ........................................................................................................................... 8
4.4 BS and MS array topologies ......................................................................................................................... 8
4.5 Spatial parameters for the BS ....................................................................................................................... 8
4.5.1 BS antenna pattern .................................................................................................................................. 8
4.5.2 Per-path BS angle spread (AS) .............................................................................................................. 10
4.5.3 Per-path BS angle of departure.............................................................................................................. 11
4.5.4 Per-path BS power azimuth spectrum .................................................................................................... 11
4.6 Spatial parameters for the MS..................................................................................................................... 11
4.6.1 MS antenna pattern ............................................................................................................................... 11
4.6.2 Per-path MS angle spread (AS) ............................................................................................................. 11
4.6.3 Per-path MS angle of arrival ................................................................................................................. 11
4.6.4 Per-path MS power azimuth spectrum ................................................................................................... 12
4.6.5 MS direction of travel ........................................................................................................................... 12
4.6.6 Per-path Doppler spectrum.................................................................................................................... 13
4.7 Generation of channel model ...................................................................................................................... 13
4.8 Calibration and reference values ................................................................................................................. 13
5 Spatial channel model for simulations ............................................................................................... 13
5.1 General definitions, parameters, and assumptions ....................................................................................... 14
5.2 Environments............................................................................................................................................. 16
5.3 Generating user parameters ........................................................................................................................ 18
5.3.1 Generating user parameters for urban macrocell and suburban macrocell environments ......................... 18
5.3.2 Generating user parameters for urban microcell environments ............................................................... 20
5.4 Generating channel coefficients .................................................................................................................. 22
5.5 Optional system simulation features ........................................................................................................... 23
5.5.1 Polarized arrays .................................................................................................................................... 23
5.5.2 Far scatterer clusters ............................................................................................................................. 25
5.5.3 Line of sight ......................................................................................................................................... 26
5.5.4 Urban canyon ....................................................................................................................................... 27
5.6 Correlation between channel parameters ..................................................................................................... 28
5.7 Modeling intercell interference ................................................................................................................... 29
5.8 System Level Calibration ........................................................................................................................... 30

Annex A: Calculation of circular angle spread ................................................................................ 38

Annex B: Change history ................................................................................................................. 40

3GPP
Release 14 4 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Foreword
This Technical Report has been produced by the 3rd Generation Partnership Project (3GPP).

The contents of the present document are subject to continuing work within the TSG and may change following formal
TSG approval. Should the TSG modify the contents of the present document, it will be re-released by the TSG with an
identifying change of release date and an increase in version number as follows:

Version x.y.z

where:

x the first digit:

1 presented to TSG for information;

2 presented to TSG for approval;

3 or greater indicates TSG approved document under change control.

y the second digit is incremented for all changes of substance, i.e. technical enhancements, corrections,
updates, etc.

z the third digit is incremented when editorial only changes have been incorporated in the document.

3GPP
Release 14 5 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

1 Scope
The present document details the output of the combined 3GPP-3GPP2 spatial channel model (SCM) ad-hoc group
(AHG).

The scope of the 3GPP-3GPP2 SCM AHG is to develop and specify parameters and methods associated with the spatial
channel modelling that are common to the needs of the 3GPP and 3GPP2 organizations. The scope includes
development of specifications for:

System level evaluation.

Within this category, a list of four focus areas are identified, however the emphasis of the SCM AHG work is on items a
and b.

a) Physical parameters (e.g. power delay profiles, angle spreads, dependencies between parameters)

b) System evaluation methodology.

c) Antenna arrangements, reference cases and definition of minimum requirements.

d) Some framework (air interface) dependent parameters.

Link level evaluation.

The link level models are defined only for calibration purposes. It is a common view within the group that the link level
simulation assumptions will not be used for evaluation and comparison of proposals.

2 References
The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present
document.

- References are either specific (identified by date of publication, edition number, version number, etc.) or
non-specific.

- For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.

- For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies. In the case of a reference to a 3GPP document (including
a GSM document), a non-specific reference implicitly refers to the latest version of that document in the same
Release as the present document.

[1] H. M. Foster, S. F. Dehghan, R. Steele, J. J. Stefanov, H. K. Strelouhov, Role of Site Shielding in

Prediction Models for Urban Radiowave Propagation (Digest No. 1994/231), IEE Colloquium on
Microcellular measurements and their prediction, 1994 pp. 2/1-2/6 .

[2] L. Greenstein, V. Erceg, Y. S. Yeh, M. V. Clark, “A New Path-Gain/Delay-Spread Propagation

Model for Digital Cellular Channels,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, VOL. 46,
NO.2, May 1997, pp.477-485.

[3] L. M. Correia, Wireless Flexible Personalized Communications, COST 259: European Co-
operation in Mobile Radio Research, Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 2001. Sec. 3.2 (M.
Steinbauer and A. F. Molisch, "Directional channel models").

3GPP
Release 14 6 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

3 Definitions, symbols and abbreviations

3.1 Definitions
For the purposes of the present document, the following terms and definitions apply.

Path: Ray

Path Component: Sub-ray

3.2 Symbols
For the purposes of the present document, the following symbols apply:

 AS Angle Spread or Azimuth Spread (Note: unless otherwise stated, the calculation of angle spread
will be based on the circular method presented in appendix A)
 DS delay spread
SF lognormal shadow fading random variable
SH log normal shadow fading constant
(a, b) represents a random normal (Gaussian) distribution with mean a and variance b.

3.3 Abbreviations
For the purposes of the present document, the following abbreviations apply:

AHG Ad Hoc Group

AoA Angle of Arrival
AoD Angle of Departure
AS

Angle Spread = Azimuth Spread = AS (Note: unless otherwise stated, the calculation of angle
spread will be based on the circular method presented in appendix A)
BS Base Station = Node-B = BTS
DoT Direction of Travel
DS

delay spread = DS
MS Mobile Station = UE = Terminal = Subscriber Unit
PAS Power Azimuth Spectrum
PDP Power Delay Profile
PL Path Loss
SCM Spacial Channel Model

SF lognormal shadow fading random variable = SF
SH log normal shadow fading constant = SH

UE User Equipment = MS

4 Spatial channel model for calibration purposes

This clause describes physical parameters for link level modelling for the purpose of calibration.

4.1 Purpose
Link level simulations alone will not be used for algorithm comparison because they reflect only one snapshot of the
channel behaviour. Furthermore, they do not account for system attributes such as scheduling and HARQ. For these
reasons, link level simulations do not allow any conclusions about the typical behaviour of the system. Only system

3GPP
Release 14 7 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

level simulations can achieve that. Therefore this document targets system level simulations for the final algorithm
comparison.

Link level simulations will not be used to compare performance of different algorithms. Rather, they will be used only
for calibration, which is the comparison of performance results from different implementations of a given algorithm.

The description is in the context of a downlink system where the BS transmits to a MS; however the material in this

4.2 Link level channel model parameter summary

The table below summarizes the physical parameters to be used for link level modelling.

Table 4.1: Summary SCM link level parameters for calibration purposes

Model Case I Case II Case III Case IV

Corresponding Case B Case C Case D Case A
3GPP Designator*
Corresponding Model A, D, E Model C Model B Model F
3GPP2 Designator*
PDP Modified Pedestrian A Vehicular A Pedestrian B Single Path
# of Paths 1) 4+1 (LOS on, K = 6dB) 6 6 1
2) 4 (LOS off)
1) 0.0
0 0,0 0 0.0 0 0 0
Relative Path Power (dB)

2) -Inf
1) -6.51
0 -1.0 310 -0.9 200
2) 0.0
Delay (ns)

1) -16.21
110 -9.0 710 -4.9 800
2) -9.7
1) -25.71
190 -10.0 1090 -8.0 1200
2) –19.2
1) -29.31
410 -15.0 1730 -7.8 2300
2) -22.8
-20.0 2510 -23.9 3700
Speed (km/h) 1) 3 3, 30, 120 3, 30, 120 3
2) 30, 120
Topology Reference 0.5λ Reference 0.5λ Reference 0.5λ N/A
PAS 1) LOS on: Fixed AoA for RMS angle RMS angle spread N/A
LOS component, remaining spread of 35 of 35 degrees per
power has 360 degree degrees per path path with a
UE/Mobile Station

uniform PAS. with a Laplacian Laplacian

2) LOS off: PAS with a distribution distribution
Laplacian distribution, RMS Or 360 degree
angle spread of 35 degrees uniform PAS.
per path
DoT 0 22.5 -22.5 N/A
(degrees)
AoA 22.5 (LOS component) 67.5 (all paths) 22.5 (odd N/A
(degrees) 67.5 (all other paths) numbered paths),
-67.5 (even
numbered paths)
Topology Reference: ULA with N/A
Node B/ Base

0.5λ-spacing or 4λ-spacing or 10λ-spacing

PAS Laplacian distribution with RMS angle spread of N/A
Station

2 degrees or 5 degrees,
per path depending on AoA/AoD
AoD/AoA 50 for 2 RMS angle spread per path N/A
(degrees) 20 for 5 RMS angle spread per path
NOTE: *Designators correspond to channel models previously proposed in 3GPP and 3GPP2 ad-hoc
groups.

3GPP
Release 14 8 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

4.3 Spatial parameters per path

Each resolvable path is characterized by its own spatial channel parameters (angle spread, angle of arrival, power
azimuth spectrum). All paths are assumed independent. These assumptions apply to both the BS and the MS specific
spatial parameters. The above assumptions are in effect only for the Link Level channel model.

4.4 BS and MS array topologies

The spatial channel model should allow any type of antenna configuration to be selected, although details of a given
configuration must be shared to allow others to reproduce the model and verify the results.

Calibrating simulators at the link level requires a common set of assumptions including a specific set of antenna
topologies to define a baseline case. At the MS, the reference element spacing is 0.5, where  is the wavelength of the
carrier frequency. At the BS, three values for reference element spacing are defined: 0.5, 4, and 10.

4.5 Spatial parameters for the BS

4.5.1 BS antenna pattern
The 3-sector antenna pattern used for each sector, Reverse Link and Forward Link, is plotted in Figure 4.1 and is
specified by

   2 
A      min 12   , Am  where  180    180 (4.5-1)
  3dB  

 is defined as the angle between the direction of interest and the boresight of the antenna,  3dB is the 3dB beamwidth
in degrees, and Am is the maximum attenuation. For a 3 sector scenario  3dB is 70 degrees, Am  20dB,and the
antenna boresight pointing direction is given by Figure 4.2. For a 6 sector scenario  3dB is 35o, Am =23dB, which
results in the pattern shown in Figure 4.3, and the boresight pointing direction defined by Figure 4.4. The boresight is
defined to be the direction to which the antenna shows the maximum gain. The gain for the 3-sector 70 degree antenna
is 14dBi. By reducing the beamwidth by half to 35 degrees, the corresponding gain will be 3dB higher resulting in
17dBi. The antenna pattern shown is targeted for diversity-oriented implementations (i.e. large inter-element spacings).
For beamforming applications that require small spacings, alternative antenna designs may have to be considered
leading to a different antenna pattern.

3GPP
Release 14 9 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

3 Sector Antenna Pattern

-5
Gain in dB.
-10

-15

-20

-25
-120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Azimuth in Degrees

Figure 4.1: Antenna pattern for 3-sector cells

3-Sector Scenario

BS

Antenna Boresight in
direction of arrow

Figure 4.2: Boresight pointing direction for 3-sector cells

3GPP
Release 14 10 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

6 Sector Antenna Pattern

-5

Gain in dB -10

-15

-20

-25
-60 -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Azimuth in Degrees

Figure 4.3: Antenna pattern for 6-sector cells

6-Sector Boundaries

BS

Antenna Boresight in
direction of arrow

Figure 4.4: Boresight pointing direction for 6-sector cells

4.5.2 Per-path BS angle spread (AS)

The base station per-path angle spread is defined as the root mean square (RMS) of angles with which an arriving path’s
power is received by the base station array. The individual path powers are defined in the temporal channel model
described in Table 4.1. Two values of BS angle spread (each associated with a corresponding mean angle of departure,
AoD) are considered:

- AS: 2 degrees at AoD 50 degrees

- AS: 5 degrees at AoD 20 degrees

It should be noted that attention should be paid when comparing the link level performance between the two angle
spread values since the BS antenna gain for the two corresponding AoDs will be different. The BS antenna gain is
applied to the path powers specified in Table 4.1.

3GPP
Release 14 11 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

4.5.3 Per-path BS angle of departure

The Angle of Departure (AoD) is defined to be the mean angle with which an arriving or departing path’s power is
received or transmitted by the BS array with respect to the boresite. The two values considered are:

- AoD: 50 degrees (associated with the RMS Angle Spread of 2 degrees)

- AoD: 20 degrees (associated with the RMS Angle Spread of 5 degrees)

4.5.4 Per-path BS power azimuth spectrum

The Power Azimuth Spectrum (PAS) of a path arriving at the base station is assumed to have a Laplacian distribution.
For an AoD  and RMS angle-spread , the BS per path PAS value at an angle  is given by:

 2  
P(, , )  N o exp  G () (4.5-2)
  
 

where both angles  and  are given with respect to the boresight of the antenna elements. It is assumed that all antenna
elements’ orientations are aligned. Also, P is the average received power and G is the numeric base station antenna gain
described in Clause 4.5.1 by

G()  100.1A() (4.5-3)

Finally, No is the normalization constant:

   2    
N o1   exp  G() d
  
    
(4.5-4)

In the above equation,  represents path components (sub-rays) of the path power arriving at an AoD  .

4.6 Spatial parameters for the MS

4.6.1 MS antenna pattern
For each and every antenna element at the MS, the antenna pattern will be assumed omni directional with an antenna
gain of -1 dBi.

4.6.2 Per-path MS angle spread (AS)

The MS per-path AS is defined as the root mean square (RMS) of angles of an incident path’s power at the MS array.
Two values of the path’s angle spread are considered:

- AS: 104 degrees (results from a uniform over 360 degree PAS),

- AS: 35 degrees for a Laplacian PAS with a certain path specific Angle of Arrival (AoA).

4.6.3 Per-path MS angle of arrival

The per-path Angle of Arrival (AoA) is defined as the mean of angles of an incident path’s power at the UE/Mobile
Station array with respect to the broadside as shown Figure 4.5.

3GPP
Release 14 12 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

AOA = 0

AOA < 0 AOA > 0

Figure 4.5: Angle of arrival orientation at the MS.

Three different per-path AoA values at the MS are suggested for the cases of a non-uniform PAS, see Table 4.1 for
details:

- AoA: -67.5 degrees (associated with an RMS Angle Spread of 35 degrees)

- AoA: +67.5 degrees (associated with an RMS Angle Spread of 35 degrees)

- AoA: +22.5 degrees (associated with an RMS Angle Spread of 35 degrees or with an LOS component)

4.6.4 Per-path MS power azimuth spectrum

The Laplacian distribution and the Uniform distribution are used to model the per-path Power Azimuth Spectrum (PAS)
at the MS.

The Power Azimuth Spectrum (PAS) of a path arriving at the MS is modeled as either a Laplacian distribution or a
uniform over 360 degree distribution. Since an omni directional MS antenna gain is assumed, the received per-path
PAS will remain either Laplacian or uniform. For an incoming AOA  and RMS angle-spread , the MS per-path
Laplacian PAS value at an angle  is given by:

 2  
P(, ,  )  N o exp  , (4.5-5)
  
 

where both angles  and  are given with respect to the boresight of the antenna elements. It is assumed that all antenna
elements’ orientations are aligned. Also, P is the average received power and No is the normalization constant:

   2    
N o1   exp   d . (4.5-6)
  
    

In the above equation,  represents path components (sub-rays) of the path power arriving at an incoming AoA  .
The distribution of these path components is TBD.

4.6.5 MS direction of travel

The mobile station direction of travel is defined with respect to the broadside of the mobile antenna array as shown in
Figure 4.6.

3GPP
Release 14 13 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

DOT = 0

DOT < 0 DOT > 0

Figure 4.6. Direction of travel for MS

4.6.6 Per-path Doppler spectrum

The per-path Doppler spectrum is defined as a function of the direction of travel and the per-path PAS and AoA at the
MS. This should correspond to the per-path fading behavior for either the correlation-based or ray-based method.

4.7 Generation of channel model

The proponent can determine the model implementation. Examples of implementations include correlation or ray-based
techniques.

4.8 Calibration and reference values

For the purpose of link level simulations, reference values of the average correlation are given below in Table 4.2. The
reference values are provided for the calibration of the simulation software and to assist in the resolution of possible
errors in the simulation methods implemented. Specifically, the average complex correlation and magnitude of the
complex correlation is reported between BS antennas and between MS antennas. The spatial parameter values used are
those defined already throughout Clause 4.

Table 4.2: Reference correlation values

Antenna AS (degrees) AOA (degrees) Correlation Complex

Spacing (magnitude) Correlation
BS 0.5  5 20 0.9688 0.4743+0.8448i
0.5  2 50 0.9975 -0.7367+0.6725i
4 5 20 0.3224 -0.2144+0.2408i
4 2 50 0.8624 0.8025+0.3158i
10  5 20 0.0704 -0.0617+i0.034
10  2 50 0.5018 -0.2762-i0.4190
MS  /2 104 0 0.3042 -0.3042
 /2 35 -67.5 0.7744 -0.6948-i0.342
 /2 35 22.5 0.4399 0.0861+0.431i
 /2 35 67.5 0.7744 -0.6948+i0.342

5 Spatial channel model for simulations

The spatial channel model for use in the system-level simulations is described in this clause. As in the link level
simulations, the description is in the context of a downlink system where the BS transmits to a MS; however the
material in this clause (with the exception of Clause 5.7 on Ioc modelling) can be applied to the uplink as well.

As opposed to link simulations which simply consider a single BS transmitting to a single MS, the system simulations
typically consist of multiple cells/sectors, BSs, and MSs. Performance metrics such as throughput and delay are
collected over D drops, where a "drop" is defined as a simulation run for a given number of cells/sectors, BSs, and MSs,
over a specified number of frames. During a drop, the channel undergoes fast fading according to the motion of the

3GPP
Release 14 14 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

MSs. Channel state information is fed back from the MSs to the BSs, and the BSs use schedulers to determine which
user(s) to transmit to. Typically, over a series of D drops, the cell layout and locations of the BSs are fixed, but the
locations of the MSs are randomly varied at the beginning of each drop. To simplify the simulation, only a subset of
BSs will actually be simulated while the remaining BSs are assumed to transmit with full power. The goal of this
clause is to define the methodology and parameters for generating the spatial and temporal channel coefficients between
a given base and mobile for use in system level simulations. For an S element BS array and a U element MS array, the
channel coefficients for one of N multipath components (note that these components are not necessarily time resolvable,
meaning that the time difference between successive paths may be less than a chip period) are given by an S -by- U
matrix of complex amplitudes. We denote the channel matrix for the nth multipath component (n = 1,…,N) as Hn (t ) . It
is a function of time t because the complex amplitudes are undergoing fast fading governed by the movement of the
MS. The overall procedure for generating the channel matrices consists of three basic steps:

1 Specify an environment, either suburban macro, urban macro, or urban micro (Clause 5.2).

2 Obtain the parameters to be used in simulations, associated with that environment (Clause 5.3).

3 Generate the channel coefficients based on the parameters (Clause 5.4).

Clauses 5.2, 5.3, and 5.4 give the details for the general procedure. Figure 5.1 below provides a roadmap for generating
the channel coefficients. Clause 5.5 specifies optional cases that modify the general procedure. Clause 5.6 describes the
procedure for generating correlated log normal user parameters used in Clause 5.3. Clause 5.7 describes the method for
accounting for intercell interference. Clause 5.8 presents calibration results.

Suburban Urban Urban

1. Choose scenario
macro macro micro

2. Determine user parameters

Angle spread  AS n,AoD Angles of departure (paths)

Lognormal shadowing LN n ,m,AoD
Angles of departure (subpaths)
Delay spread DS n Path delays Far scattering cluster
Pathloss Pn Average path powers (urban macro)
Orientation, Speed Vector n,AoA Angles of arrival (paths) Urban canyon
BS MS MS v n ,m,AoA Angles of arrival (subpaths) (urban macro)

Antenna gains

Polarization
3. Generate channel coefficients LOS (urban micro) Options

Figure 5.1: Channel model overview for simulations

5.1 General definitions, parameters, and assumptions

The received signal at the MS consists of N time-delayed multipath replicas of the transmitted signal. These N paths are
defined by powers and delays and are chosen randomly according to the channel generation procedure. Each path
consists of M subpaths.

Figure 5.2 shows the angular parameters used in the model. The following definitions are used:

3GPP
Release 14 15 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

 BS BS antenna array orientation, defined as the difference between the broadside of the BS array and
the absolute North (N) reference direction.
BS LOS AoD direction between the BS and MS, with respect to the broadside of the BS array.
n, AoD
AoD for the nth (n = 1 … N) path with respect to the LOS AoD  0 .
 n ,m ,AoD n, AoD
Offset for the mth (m = 1 … M) subpath of the nth path with respect to .
n ,m , AoD
Absolute AoD for the mth (m = 1 … M) subpath of the nth path at the BS with respect to the BS
broadside.
 MS MS antenna array orientation, defined as the difference between the broadside of the MS array
and the absolute North reference direction.
MS Angle between the BS-MS LOS and the MS broadside.
n, AoA 0,MS
AoA for the nth (n = 1 … N) path with respect to the LOS AoA .
 n ,m ,AoA n, AoA
Offset for the mth (m = 1 … M) subpath of the nth path with respect to .
n ,m , AoA
Absolute AoA for the mth (m = 1 … M) subpath of the nth path at the MS with respect to the BS
broadside.
v MS velocity vector.
v Angle of the velocity vector with respect to the MS broadside:  v =arg(v).

The angles shown in Figure 5.2 that are measured in a clockwise direction are assumed to be negative in value.

Cluster n
N
Subpath m n ,m ,AoA
BS array  MS v v
n ,m ,AoD
n ,m , AoA
n ,AoA

N
n, AoD
 BS MS

n ,m , AoD MS array broadside MS array

BS
MS direction
BS array broadside of travel

Figure 5.2: BS and MS angle parameters

For system level simulation purposes, the fast fading per-path will be evolved in time, although bulk parameters
including angle spread, delay spread, log normal shadowing, and MS location will remain fixed during the its
evaluation during a drop.

The following are general assumptions made for all simulations, independent of environment:

a) Uplink-Downlink Reciprocity: The AoD/AoA values are identical between the uplink and downlink.

b) For FDD systems, random subpath phases between UL, DL are uncorrelated. (For TDD systems, the phases will
be fully correlated.)

c) Shadowing among different mobiles is uncorrelated. In practice, this assumption would not hold if mobiles are
very close to each other, but we make this assumption just to simplify the model.

d) The spatial channel model should allow any type of antenna configuration (e.g. whose size is smaller than the
shadowing coherence distance) to be selected, although details of a given configuration must be shared to allow

3GPP
Release 14 16 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

others to reproduce the model and verify the results. It is intended that the spatial channel model be capable of
operating on any given antenna array configuration. In order to compare algorithms, reference antenna
configurations based on uniform linear array configurations with 0.5, 4, and 10 wavelength inter-element spacing
will be used.

e) The composite AS, DS, and SF shadow fading, which may be correlated parameters depending on the channel
scenario, are applied to all the sectors or antennas of a given base. Sub-path phases are random between sectors.
The AS is composed of 6 x 20 sub-paths, and each has a precise angle of departure which corresponds to an
antenna gain from each BS antenna. The effect of the antennas gain may cause some change to the channel
model in both AS and DS between different base antennas, but this is separate from the channel model. The SF
is a bulk parameter and is common among all the BS antennas or sectors.

f) The elevation spread is not modeled.

g) To allow comparisons of different antenna scenarios, the transmit power of a single antenna case shall be the
same as the total transmit power of a multiple antenna case.

h) The generation of the channel coefficients (Clause 5.4) assumes linear arrays. The procedure can be generalized
for other array configurations, but these modifications are left for the proponent.

5.2 Environments
We consider the following three environments.

a) Suburban macrocell (approximately 3Km distance BS to BS)

b) Urban macrocell (approximately 3Km distance BS to BS)

c) Urban microcell (less than 1Km distance BS to BS)

The characteristics of the macro cell environments assume that BS antennas are above rooftop height. For the urban
microcell scenario, we assume the BS antenna is at rooftop height. Table 5.1 describes the parameters used in each of
the environments.

3GPP
Release 14 17 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Table 5.1. Environment parameters

Channel Scenario Suburban Macro Urban Macro Urban Micro

Number of paths (N) 6 6 6
Number of sub-paths (M) per-path 20 20 20
Mean AS at BS E(  AS )=50 E(  AS )=80, 150 NLOS: E(  AS )=190
AS at BS as a lognormal RV  AS = 0.69 8  AS = 0.810
0 N/A
 AS  10 ^   AS x   AS  , x ~ (0,1)  AS = 0.13  AS = 0.34
15  AS = 1.18
0

 AS = 0.210
rAS   AoD /  AS 1.2 1.3 N/A
Per-path AS at BS (Fixed) 2 deg 2 deg 5 deg (LOS and NLOS)

BS per-path AoD Distribution standard (0, 2AoD ) where (0, 2AoD ) where U(-40deg, 40deg)
distribution
 AoD  r AS  AS  AoD  r AS  AS
Mean AS at MS E(AS, MS)=680 E(AS, MS)=680 E(AS, MS)=680
Per-path AS at MS (fixed) 350 350 350
MS Per-path AoA Distribution (0,  2AoA (Pr)) (0, 2AoA (Pr)) (0, 2AoA (Pr))
Delay spread as a lognormal RV DS = - 6.80 DS = -6.18 N/A
DS  10 ^  DS x  DS  , x ~ (0,1) DS = 0.288 DS = 0.18
Mean total RMS Delay Spread E(  DS )=0.17 s E(  DS )=0.65 s E(  DS )=0.251s (output)
rDS   delays /  DS 1.4 1.7 N/A
Distribution for path delays U(0, 1.2s)
Lognormal shadowing standard 8dB 8dB NLOS: 10dB
deviation, SF LOS: 4dB
Pathloss model (dB), 31.5 + 35log10(d) 34.5 + 35log10(d) NLOS: 34.53 + 38log10(d)
d is in meters LOS: 30.18 + 26*log10(d)

The following are assumptions made for the suburban macrocell and urban macrocell environments.

a) The macrocell pathloss is based on the modified COST231 Hata urban propagation model:

PL[dB]   44.9  6.55log10  hbs   log10 (

d
)  45.5 
1000 (5.2-1)
 35.46  1.1hms  log10 ( f c )  13.82 log10 (hbs )  0.7hms  C

where hbs is the BS antenna height in meters, hms the MS antenna height in meters, f c the carrier frequency in
MHz, d is the distance between the BS and MS in meters, and C is a constant factor (C = 0dB for suburban
macro and C = 3dB for urban macro). Setting these parameters to hbs = 32m, hms = 1.5m, and f c =1900MHz,
the pathlosses for suburban and urban macro environments become, respectively, PL  31.5  35log10 (d ) and
PL  34.5  35log10 (d ) . The distance d is required to be at least 35m.

b) Antenna patterns at the BS are the same as those used in the link simulations given in Clause 4.5.1.

c) Site-to-site SF correlation is   0.5 . This parameter is used in Clause 5.6.2.

d) The hexagonal cell repeats will be the assumed layout.

The following are assumptions made for the microcell environment.

a) The microcell NLOS pathloss is based on the COST 231 Walfish-Ikegami NLOS model with the following
parameters: BS antenna height 12.5m, building height 12m, building to building distance 50m, street width 25m,
MS antenna height 1.5m, orientation 30deg for all paths, and selection of metropolitan center. With these
parameters, the equation simplifies to:

3GPP
Release 14 18 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

PL(dB) = -55.9 + 38*log10(d) + (24.5 + 1.5*fc/925)*log10(fc). (5.2-2)

The resulting pathloss at 1900 MHz is: PL(dB) = 34.53 + 38*log10(d), where d is in meters. The distance d is at
least 20m. A bulk log normal shadowing applying to all sub-paths has a standard deviation of 10dB.

The microcell LOS pathloss is based on the COST 231 Walfish-Ikegami street canyon model with the same
parameters as in the NLOS case. The pathloss is

PL(dB) = -35.4 + 26*log10(d) + 20*log10(fc) (5.2-3)

The resulting pathloss at 1900 MHz is PL(dB) = 30.18 + 26*log10(d), where d is in meters. The distance d is at
least 20m. A bulk log normal shadowing applying to all sub-paths has a standard deviation of 4dB.

b) Antenna patterns at the BS are the same as those used in the link simulations given in Clause 4.5.1.

c) Site-to-site correlation is   0.5 . This parameter is used in Clause 5.6.2.

d) The hexagonal cell repeats will be the assumed layout.

Note that the SCM model described here with N = 6 paths may not be suitable for systems with bandwidth higher than
5MHz.

5.3 Generating user parameters

For a given scenario and set of parameters given by a column of Table 5.1 Environment parameters, realizations of each
user's parameters such as the path delays, powers, and sub-path angles of departure and arrival can be derived using the
procedure described here in Clause 5.3. In particular, Clause 5.3.1 gives the steps for the urban macrocell and suburban
macrocell environments, and Clause 5.3.2 gives the steps for the urban microcell environments.

5.3.1 Generating user parameters for urban macrocell and suburban

macrocell environments
Step 1: Choose either an urban macrocell or suburban macrocell environment.

Step 2: Determine various distance and orientation parameters. The placement of the MS with respect to each BS is to
be determined according to the cell layout. From this placement, the distance between the MS and the BS (d) and
the LOS directions with respect to the BS and MS (  BS and  MS , respectively) can be determined. Calculate the
bulk path loss associated with the BS to MS distance. The MS antenna array orientations (  MS ), are i.i.d., drawn
from a uniform 0 to 360 degree distribution. The MS velocity vector v has a magnitude v drawn according to a
velocity distribution (to be determined) and direction  v drawn from a uniform 0 to 360 degree distribution.

Step 3: Determine the DS, AS, and SF. These variables, given respectively by  DS ,  AS , and  SF , are generated as
described in Clause 5.6 below. Note that 10^ ( DS ) is in units of seconds so that the narrowband composite delay
spread  DS is in units of seconds. Note also that we have dropped the BS indicies used in Clause 5.6.1 to simplify
notation.

Step 4: Determine random delays for each of the N multipath components. For macrocell environments, N = 6 as given
in Table 5.1. Generate random variables 1' ,..., 'N according to

'n  rDS  DS ln zn n = 1,…,N (5.3-1)

zn
where (n = 1,…,N) are i.i.d. random variables with uniform distribution U(0,1), rDS is given in Table 5.1, and
 DS  '  (' N 1)  ...  ('1)
is derived in Step 3 above. These variables are ordered so that (N ) and the minimum of
' '
  
these is subtracted from all . The delay for the nth path n is the value of (n ) (1)
are quantized in time to the
nearest 1/16th chip interval:

3GPP
Release 14 19 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Tc   '( n)   '(1) 
n   floor   0.5 , n  1, ..., N , (5.3-2)
16  Tc 16 
 

where floor(x) is the integer part of x, and Tc is the chip interval (Tc = 1/3.84x106 sec for 3GPP and Tc =
1/1.2288x106 sec for 3GPP2) Note that these delays are ordered so that  N   5  ...  1  0 . (See notes 1 and 2
at the end of Clause 5.3.1.) Quantization to 1/16 chip is the default value. For special purpose implementations,
possibly higher quantization values may be used if needed.

Step 5: Determine random average powers for each of the N multipath components. Let the unnormalized powers be
given by
(1rDS )( (n )  (1) )
rDS DS
Pn  e  10 n /10 , n = 1,…,6 (5.3-3)

where  n (n = 1,…,6) are i.i.d. Gaussian random variables with standard deviation  RND = 3 dB, which is a
shadowing randomization effect on the per-path powers. Note that the powers are determined using the unquantized
channel delays. Average powers are normalized so that the total average power for all six paths is equal to one:

Pn'
Pn  . (5.3-4)

6
P j'
j 1

(See note 3 at the end of Clause 5.3.1.)

Step 6: Determine AoDs for each of the N multipath components. First generate i.i.d. zero-mean Gaussian random
variables:

'n ~ (0,  2AoD ) , n = 1,…, N, (5.3-5)

 r 
where AoD AS AS . The value rAS is given in Table 5.1 and depends on whether the urban or suburban
macrocell environment is chosen. The angle spread AS is generated in Step 3. These variables are given in
'  '(2)  ...  (' N ) 
degrees. They are ordered in increasing absolute value so that (1) . The AoDs n, AoD , n = 1,…,
  (' n)
N are assigned to the ordered variables so that n, AoD , n = 1,…,N. (See note 4 at the end of Clause 5.3.1.)

Step 7: Associate the multipath delays with AoDs. The nth delay  n generated in Step 3 is associated with the nth AoD
n, AoD generated in Step 6.

Step 8: Determine the powers, phases and offset AoDs of the M = 20 sub-paths for each of the N paths at the BS. All 20
sub-path associated with the nth path have identical powers ( Pn /20 where Pn is from Step 5) and i.i.d phases
 n ,m drawn from a uniform 0 to 360 degree distribution. The relative offset of the mth subpath (m = 1,…, M)
 n ,m ,AoD is a fixed value given in Table5.2. For example, for the urban and suburban macrocell cases, the offsets
for the first and second sub-paths are respectively  n ,1,AoD = 0.0894 and  n ,2,AoD = -0.0894 degrees. These
offsets are chosen to result in the desired per-path angle spread (2 degrees for the macrocell environments, and 5
degrees for the microcell environment). The per-path angle spread of the nth path (n = 1 … N) is in contrast to the
angle spread  n which refers to the composite signal with N paths.

Step 9: Determine the AoAs for each of the multipath components. The AoAs are i.i.d. Gaussian random variables

n, AoA ~ (0, 2n, AoA ) , n = 1,…, N, (5.3-6)

 
where n, AoA = 104.12 1-exp  -0.2175 10log10 ( Pn )  and Pn is the relative power of the nth path from Step 5.
(See note 5 at the end of Clause 5.3.1)

3GPP
Release 14 20 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Step 10: Determine the offset AoAs at the UE of the M = 20 sub-paths for each of the N paths at the MS. As in Step 8
for the AoD offsets, the relative offset of the mth subpath (m = 1,…, M)  n ,m ,AoA is a fixed value given in Table
5.2. These offsets are chosen to result in the desired per-path angle spread of 35 degrees.

Step 11: Associate the BS and MS paths and sub-paths. The nth BS path (defined by its delay  n , power Pn , and AoD
n, AoD ) is associated with the nth MS path (defined by its AoA  n,AoA ). For the nth path pair, randomly pair each
of the M BS sub-paths (defined by its offset  n ,m ,AoD ) with a MS sub-path (defined by its offset  n ,m ,AoA ). Each
sub-path pair is combined so that the phases defined by  n ,m in step 8 are maintained. To simplify the notation,
we renumber the M MS sub-path offsets with their newly associated BS sub-path. In other words, if the first (m =
1) BS sub-path is randomly paired with the 10th (m = 10) MS sub-path, we re-associate  n ,1,AoA (after pairing)
with  n ,10,AoA (before pairing).

Step 12: Determine the antenna gains of the BS and MS sub-paths as a function of their respective sub-path AoDs and
AoAs. For the nth path, the AoD of the mth sub-path (with respect to the BS antenna array broadside) is

 n,m, AoD   BS   n, AoD   n,m, AoD . (5.3-7)

Similarly, the AoA of the mth sub-path for the nth path (with respect to the MS antenna array broadside) is

 n,m, AoA   MS   n, AoA   n,m, AoA . (5.3-8)

The antenna gains are dependent on these sub-path AoDs and AoAs. For the BS and MS, these are given
respectively as G BS ( n,m, AoD ) and G MS ( n,m, AoA ) .

Step 13: Apply the path loss based on the BS to MS distance from Step 2, and the log normal shadow fading
determined in step 3 as bulk parameters to each of the sub-path powers of the channel model.

Notes:

Note 1: In the development of the Spatial Channel Model, care was taken to include the statistical relationships between
r   delays /  DS
Angles and Powers, as well as Delays and Powers. This was done using the proportionality factors DS
r   AoD /  PAS that were based on measurements.
and AS

Note 2: While there is some evidence that delay spread may depend on distance between the transmitter and receiver,
the effect is considered to be minor (compared to other dependencies: DS-AS, DS-SF.). Various inputs based on
multiple data sets indicate that the trend of DS can be either slightly positive or negative, and may sometimes be
relatively flat with distance. For these reasons and also for simplicity, a distance dependence on DS is not modeled.

Note 3: The equations presented here for the power of the nth path are based on a power-delay envelope which is the
average behavior of the power-delay profile. Defining the powers to reproduce the average behavior limits the dynamic
range of the result and does not reproduce the expected randomness from trial to trial. The randomizing process n is
used to vary the powers with respect to the average envelope to reproduce the variations experienced in the actual
channel. This parameter is also necessary to produce a dynamic range comparable to measurements.

Note 4: The quantity rAS describes the distribution of powers in angle and rAS   AoD /  PAS , i.e. the spread of angles
to the power weighted angle spread. Higher values of rAS correspond to more power being concentrated in a small
AoD or a small number of paths that are closely spaced in angle.

Note 5: Although two different mechanisms are used to select the AoD from the Base, and the AoA at the MS, the
paths are sufficiently defined by their BS to MS connection, power Pn, and delay, thus there is no ambiguity in
associating the paths to these parameters at the BS or MS.

5.3.2 Generating user parameters for urban microcell environments

Urban microcell environments differ from the macrocell environments in that the individual multipaths are
independently shadowed. As in the macrocell case, N = 6 paths are modeled. We list the entire procedure but only
describe the details of the steps that differ from the corresponding step of the macrocell procedure.

3GPP
Release 14 21 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Step 1: Choose the urban microcell environment.

Step 2: Determine various distance and orientation parameters.

Step 3: Determine the bulk path loss and log normal shadow fading parameters.

Step 4: Determine the random delays for each of the N multipath components. For the microcell environment, N = 6.
The delays n , n = 1, … , N are i.i.d. random variables drawn from a uniform distribution from 0 to 1.2 s.

Step 5: The minimum of these delays is subtracted from all so that the first delay is zero. The delays are quantized in
time to the nearest 1/16th chip interval as described in Clause 5.3.1. When the LOS model is used, the delay of the
direct component will be set equal to the first arriving path with zero delay.

Step 6: Determine random average powers for each of the N multipath components. The PDP consists of N=6 distinct
paths that are uniformly distributed between 0 and 1.2s. The powers for each path are exponentially decaying in
time with the addition of a lognormal randomness, which is independent of the path delay:

P ' n  10  ( n  zn / 10) (5.3-9)

where  n is the unquantized values and given in units of microseconds, and z n (n = 1,…,N)
are i.i.d. zero mean Gaussian random variables with a standard deviation of 3dB. Average
powers are normalized so that total average power for all six paths is equal to one:

Pn'
Pn  . (5.3-10)

6
Pj'
j 1

When the LOS model is used, the normalization of the path powers includes consideration of
the power of the direct component PD such that the ratio of powers in the direct path to the
scattered paths has a ratio of K:

Pn' K
Pn  , PD  . (5.3-11)
 K  1  j 1 Pj' K 1
6

Step 7: Determine AoDs for each of the N multipath components. The AoDs (with respect to the LOS direction) are
i.i.d. random variables drawn from a uniform distribution over –40 to +40 degrees:

n, AoD ~ U (40 , 40 ) , n = 1,…, N, (5.3-12)

Associate the AoD of the nth path n ,AoD with the power of the nth path Pn . Note unlike the macrocell
environment, the AoDs do not need to be sorted before being assigned to a path power. When the LOS model is
used, the AoD for the direct component is set equal to the line-of-sight path direction.

Step 8: Randomly associate the multipath delays with AoDs.

Step 9: Determine the powers, phases, and offset AoDs of the M = 20 sub-paths for each of the N paths at the BS. The
offsets are given in Table 5.2, and the resulting per-path AS is 5 degrees instead of 2 degrees for the macrocell
case. The direct component, used with the LOS model will have no per-path AS.

Step 10: Determine the AoAs for each of the multipath components. The AoAs are i.i.d Gaussian random variables

n, AoA ~ (0, 2n, AoA )

, n = 1,…, N, (5.3-13)

 
where n, AoA = 104.12 1-exp  -0.265 10log10 ( Pn )  and Pn is the relative power of the nth path from Step 5.

When the LOS model is used, the AoA for the direct component is set equal to the line-of-sight path direction.

Step 11: Determine the offset AoAs of the M = 20 sub-paths for each of the N paths at the MS.

3GPP
Release 14 22 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Step 12: Associate the BS and MS paths and sub-paths. Sub-paths are randomly paired for each path, and the sub-path
phases defined at the BS and MS are maintained.

Step 13: Determine the antenna gains of the BS and MS sub-paths as a function of their respective sub-path AoDs and
AoAs.

Step 14: Apply the path loss based on the BS to MS distance and the log normal shadow fading determined in Step 3 as
bulk parameters to each of the sub-path powers of the channel model.

Table 5.2: Sub-path AoD and AoA offsets

Sub-path # Offset for a 2 deg AS at Offset for a 5 deg AS at Offset for a 35 deg AS
(m) BS (Macrocell) BS (Microcell) at MS
 n ,m ,AoD (degrees)  n ,m ,AoD (degrees)  n ,m ,AoA (degrees)
1, 2  0.0894  0.2236  1.5649
3, 4  0.2826  0.7064  4.9447
5, 6  0.4984  1.2461  8.7224
7, 8  0.7431  1.8578  13.0045
9, 10  1.0257  2.5642  17.9492
11, 12  1.3594  3.3986  23.7899
13, 14  1.7688  4.4220  30.9538
15, 16  2.2961  5.7403  40.1824
17, 18  3.0389  7.5974  53.1816
19, 20  4.3101  10.7753  75.4274

The values in Table 5.2 are selected to produce a biased standard deviation equal to 2, 5, and 35 degrees, which is
equivalent to the per-path power weighted azimuth spread for equal power sub-paths.

5.4 Generating channel coefficients

Given the user parameters generated in Clause 5.3, we use them to generate the channel coefficients. For an S element
linear BS array and a U element linear MS array, the channel coefficients for one of N multipath components are given
by a U -by- S matrix of complex amplitudes. We denote the channel matrix for the nth multipath component (n =
1,…,N) as Hn (t ) . The (u,s)th component (s = 1,…,S; u = 1,…,U) of Hn (t ) is given by

 
 G BS  n,m, AoD  exp  j kds sin  n,m, AoD    n,m   
 
Pn  SF M

 G MS  n,m, AoA  exp  jkd u sin  n,m, AoA  

 
hu , s ,n (t ) 
M   (5.4-1)
m 1 
 
 exp jk v cos  n,m, AoA   v t

  



where

Pn is the power of the nth path (Step 5).

 SF
is the lognormal shadow fading (Step 3), applied as a bulk parameter to the n paths for a given
drop.
M is the number of subpaths per-path.
 n,m, AoD
is the the AoD for the mth subpath of the nth path (Step 12).
 n,m , AoA
is the the AoA for the mth subpath of the nth path (Step 12).
G BS ( n,m, AoD )
is the BS antenna gain of each array element (Step 12).
G MS ( n, m, AoA )
is the MS antenna gain of each array element (Step 12).
j is the square root of -1.
k is the wave number 2  /  where  is the carrier wavelength in meters.
ds
is the distance in meters from BS antenna element s from the reference (s = 1) antenna. For the
d
reference antenna s = 1, 1 =0.

3GPP
Release 14 23 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

du is the distance in meters from MS antenna element u from the reference (u = 1) antenna. For the
reference antenna u = 1, d1 =0.
 n,m
is the phase of the mth subpath of the nth path (Step 8).
v
is the magnitude of the MS velocity vector (Step 2).
v is the angle of the MS velocity vector (Step 2).

The path loss and the log normal shadowing is applied as bulk parameters to each of the sub-path components of the n
path components of the channel.

5.5 Optional system simulation features

5.5.1 Polarized arrays
Practical antennas on handheld devices require spacings much less than  / 2 . Polarized antennas are likely to be the
primary way to implement multiple antennas. A cross-polarized model is therefore included here.

A method of describing polarized antennas is presented, which is compatible with the 13 step procedure given in Clause
5.3. The following steps replace step 13 with the new steps 13-19 to account for the additional polarized components.
The (S/2)-element BS arrays and (U/2)-element MS arrays consist of U and S (i.e., twice in number)antennas in the V,
H, or off-axis polarization.

Step 13: Generate additional cross-polarized subpaths. For each of the 6 paths of Step 4, generate an additional M
subpaths at the MS and M subpaths at the BS to represent the portion of each signal that leaks into the cross-
polarized antenna orientation due to scattering.

Step 14:. Set subpath AoDs and AoAs. Set the AoD and AoA of each subpath in Step 13 equal to that of the
corresponding subpath of the co-polarized antenna orientation. (Orthogonal sub-rays arrive/depart at common
angles.)

Step 15: Generate phase offsets for the cross-polarized elements. We define n( x,m
,y )
to be the phase offset of the mth
subpath of the nth path between the x component (e.g. either the horizontal h or vertical v) of the BS element and
the y component (e.g. either the horizontal h or vertical v) of the MS element. Set n( x,m,x ) to be  n,m generated in
Step 8 of Clause 5.3. Generate n( x,m,y ) , n(y,m,x ) , and n(y,m,y ) as i.i.d random variables drawn from a uniform 0 to 360
degree distribution. (x and y can alternatively represent the co-polarized and cross-polarized orientations.)

Step 16: Decompose each of the co-polarized and cross-polarized sub-rays into vertical and horizontal components
based on the co-polarized and cross-polarized orientations.

Step 17: The coupled power P2 of each sub-path in the horizontal orientation is set relative to the power P1 of each
sub-path in the vertical orientation according to an XPD ratio, defined as XPD= P1/P2. A single XPD ratio applies
to all sub-paths of a given path. Each path n experiences an independent realization of the XPD. For each path the
realization of the XPD is drawn from the distributions below.

For urban macrocells: P2 = P1 - A - B*  (0,1), where A=0.34*(mean relative path power in dB)+7.2 dB, and
B=5.5dB is the standard deviation of the XPD variation.

For urban microcells: P2 = P1 - A - B*  (0,1), where A=8 dB, and B=8dB is the standard deviation of the XPD
variation.

The value  (0,1) is a zero mean Gaussian random number with unit variance and is held constant for all sub-paths
of a given path.

By symmetry, the coupled power of the opposite process (horizontal to vertical) is the same. The V-to-H XPD
draws are independent of the H-to-V draws.

3GPP
Release 14 24 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Step 18: At the receive antennas, decompose each of the vertical and horizontal components into components that are
co-polarized with the receive antennas and sum the components. This procedure is performed within the channel
coefficient expression given below.

Step 19: Apply the path loss based on the BS to MS distance from Step 2, and the log normal shadow fading
determined in step 3 as bulk parameters to each of the sub-path powers of the channel model.

The fading behavior between the cross pol elements will be a function of the per-ray spreads and the Doppler. The
fading between orthogonal polarizations has been observed to be independent and therefore the sub-rays phases are
chosen randomly. The propagation characteristics of V-to-V paths are assumed to be equivalent to the propagation
characteristics of H-to-H paths.

The polarization model can be illustrated by a matrix describing the propagation of and mixing between horizontal and
vertical amplitude of each sub-path. The resulting channel realization is:

  ( v ) (    exp  j n ,m  rn1 exp  j (nv,m,h )    (MS 

T ( v ,v )

  BS n ,m , AoD )  
v)
( ) 
Pn  SF M  ( h ) (    ( h ) n ,m , AoA  
hu , s ,n (t ) 
M
 m1   BS n , m , AoD )  
 n2 r exp  j  ( h ,v )
n ,m  exp  j  ( h ,h )
n ,m  
   MS (  n , m , AoA )   (5.5-1)

 exp  jkd sin( 
 s n , m , AoD )   exp  jkd u sin(  n , m , AoA )   exp  jk v cos( θ n , m , AoA   v ) t  


where:

 (BS
v)
( n, m, AoD ) is the BS antenna complex response for the V-pol component.
 (BS
h)
( n, m, AoD )
is the BS antenna complex response for the H-pol component.
 (MS
v)
( n , m, AoA )
is the MS antenna complex response for the V-pol component.
 (MS
h)
( n , m, AoA )
is the MS antenna complex response for the H-pol component.
2
(.) (.)
is the antenna gain
rn1 is the random variable representing the power ratio of waves of the nth path leaving the BS in the
vertical direction and arriving at the MS in the horizontal direction (v-h) to those leaving in the
vertical direction and arriving in the vertical direction (v-v).
rn 2 is the random variable representing the power ratio of waves of the nth path leaving the BS in the
horizontal direction and arriving at the MS in the vertical direction (h-v) to those leaving in the
r r
vertical direction and arriving in the vertical direction (v-v). The variables n1 and n 2 are i.i.d.
(nx,m, y )
phase offset of the mth subpath of the nth path between the x component (either the horizontal h or
vertical v) of the BS element and the y component (either the horizontal h or vertical v) of the MS
element.

The other variables are described in Clause 5.4. Note that the description above corresponds to a transmission from the
base to mobile. The appropriate subscript and superscript changes should be made for uplink transmissions.

The 2x2 matrix represents the scattering phases and amplitudes of a plane wave leaving the UE with a given angle and
polarization and arriving Node B with another direction and polarization. rn is the average power ratio of waves
leaving the UE in the vertical direction and arriving at Node B in the horizontal direction (v-h) to those arriving at Node
B in the vertical direction (v-v). By symmetry the power ratio of the opposite process (h-v over v-v) is chosen to be the
same. Note that: rn =1/XPD; for the macrocell model, the XPD is dependent on the path index; for the microcell
model, the XPD is independent of path index.

Expression (2) assumes a random pairing of the of the sub-paths from the MS and BS. The random orientation of the
MS (UE) array affects the value of the angle n ,m , AoA of each sub-path.

3GPP
Release 14 25 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

If for example, only vertically polarized antennas are used at both NodeB and UE then the antenna responses become
1 
 0  and expression (2) becomes identical to (1). For an ideal dipole antenna at the NodeB tilted with respect to the z-
 
 cos() 
axis at  degrees the above vector becomes  .
sin( )  cos( )
n , m, AoA 

The elevation spectrum is not modeled.

5.5.2 Far scatterer clusters

The Far scatterer cluster model is switch selectable. It represents the bad-urban case where additional clusters are seen
in the environment. This model is limited to use with the urban macro-cell where the first cluster will be the primary
cluster and the second will be the far scattering cluster (FSC). When the model is active, it will have the following
characteristics:

There is a reduction in the number of paths in the primary cluster from N = 6 to N1 = 4, with the far scattering cluster
then having N2 = 2. Thus the total number of paths will stay the same, now N = N1 + N2 = 4 + 2. This is a modification
to the SCM channel generation procedure in Clause 5.3.

The FSCs will only be modeled for the serving cell, with 3 independent FSCs in the cell uniformly applied to the area of
the cell outside the minimum radius.

The following is a generation procedure for the FSC model and is used in conjunction with the normal channel
generation procedure in Clause 5.3.

Step 1. Drop the MS within test cell.

Step 2. Drop three FS clusters uniformly across the cell hexagon, with a minimum radius of R = 500m.

Step 3. Choose the FS cluster to use for the mobile that is closest to the mobile.

Step 4. Generate 6 delays 1 ,  2 ,  3 ,  4 ,  5 ,  6 .

Step 5. Sort 1 ,  2 ,  3 ,  4 in order of increasing delays,

Step 6. Subtract shortest delay of 1 ,  2 ,  3 ,  4 from each of 1 ,  2 ,  3 ,  4 

Step 7. Sort  5 ,  6 in the order of increasing delays,

Step 8. Subtract shorter delay of  5 ,  6 from each of  5 ,  6 

Step 9. Assign powers to paths corresponding to all 6 delays:

(1 rDS ) n
rDS  DS
Pn  e  10 n / 10 , n = 1,…,6 (5.5-2)

where n (n = 1,…,6) are i.i.d. Gaussian random variables with standard deviation  RND = 3 dB.

Step 10. Calculate excess path delay  excess and add to  5 ,  6 

Step 11. Attenuate P5 and P6 by 1dB/s of excess delay with a 10dB maximum attenuation. The excess delay will be
defined as the difference in propagation time between the BS-MS LOS distance, and the BS-FSC-MS distance.

Step 12. Scale each of the powers in the main cluster and in the FSC by a common log normal randomizing factor of
8dB/ 2 drawn once per cluster to represent the effect of the independent per cluster shadow fading after including
site correlation of the mobile location.

Step 13. Normalize powers of the 6 paths to unity power.

Step 14. Select AoDs at the BS for the main cluster from the channel generation procedure in Clause 5.3. Select AoDs
at the BS for the FSC referenced to the direction of the FSC and selecting values from a Gaussian distribution with

3GPP
Release 14 26 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

standard deviation rAS*mean(AS), where the mean(AS) is equal to 8 degrees or 15 degrees, chosen to match the
angle spread model used.

Step 15. Select AoAs at the MS using the equation in step 9 of Clause 5.3, where the 4 paths associated with the main
cluster are referenced to the LOS direction to the BS, and the 2 paths associated with the FSC are referenced to the
direction of the FSC. The relative powers used are the normalized powers of step 13 of this clause.

Step 16. Apply the bulk path loss and log normal to all 6 paths and apply the antenna gains accounting for the angles of
the sub-paths associated with the main cluster and the FSC.

5.5.3 Line of sight

The line-of-sight (LOS) model is an option that is switch selectable for the urban micro scenario only. LOS modelling
will not be defined for the suburban or urban macro cases due to the low probability of occurrence. The LOS modelling
is based on the Ricean K factor defined as the ratio of power in the LOS component to the total power in the diffused
non line-of-sight (NLOS) component. The K factor may be defined in dB or linear units in the equations in this
document. The LOS component is a direct component and therefore has no per-path angle spreading. The LOS model
uses the following description when this function is selected.

For the NLOS case, the Ricean K factor is set to 0, thus the fading is determined by the combination of sub-rays as
described in Clause 5.3 of the model.

For the LOS case, the Ricean K factor is based on a simplified version of [1] : K = 13-0.03*d (dB) where d is the
distance between MS and BS in meters.

The probability for LOS or NLOS depends on various environmental factors, including clutter, street canyons, and
distance. For simplicity, the probability of LOS is defined to be unity at zero distance, and decreases linearly until a
cutoff point at d=300m, where the LOS probability is zero.

(300  d ) / 300, 0  d  300m

P( LOS )   (5.5-3)
 0, d  300m

The K-factor, propagation slope, and shadow fading standard deviation will all be chosen based on the results of
selecting the path to be LOS or NLOS.

The total combined power of the LOS component and the 6 diffuse components is normalized to unity power so the
K
coherent LOS component will have a relative amplitude and the amplitudes of all 6 diffuse paths will have a
K 1
1
relative amplitude , where K is in linear units. The LOS path will coincide in time (but not necessarily in angle)
K 1
with the first (earliest) diffused path. When pairing sub-rays between transmitter and receiver, the direct components are
paired representing the LOS path. The AoD and AoA of the LOS component are given by  BS and MS , respectively.

Following the definitions in Clause 5.4, the (u,s)th component of the channel coefficient (u = 1,…,U; s = 1,…,S) for
path n  1 is given by:

 GBS ( BS ) exp  jkds sin(  BS )   

 
K 
GMS ( MS ) exp  jkdu sin(  MS )   LOS   
1
, s , n 1 (t ) 
huLOS hu , s ,1 (t )   SF (5.5-4)
K 1 K  1 
 exp  jk v cos( MS  v )t  
 
and by

1
, s , n (t ) 
huLOS hu , s , n (t ) (5.5-5)
K 1
for n  1,

3GPP
Release 14 27 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

where hu , s , n (t ); n  1,..., N is as defined in Clause 5.4 and:

 BS is the the AoD for the LOS component at the base

 MS is the the AoA for the LOS component at the terminal
 LOS is the phase of the LOS component
K is the K factor

5.5.4 Urban canyon

The urban canyon model is switch selectable. When switched on, the model modifies the AoAs of the paths arriving at
the subscriber unit. It is for use in both the urban macro and urban micro scenarios.

Urban-canyons exist in dense urban areas served by macro-cells, and for at-rooftop micro-cells. When this model is
used, the spatial channel for all subscribers in the simulated universe will be defined by the statistical model given
below. Thus for the SCM channel generation steps given in Clause 5.3, Step 9 is replaced with steps 9a-d given below,
which describe the AoAs of the paths arriving at the subscriber in the urban canyon scenario.

The following procedure is used to determine the subscriber mean AoAs of the six paths. This model does not use a
building grid, but assigns angles based on statistical data presented in the figures below. The procedure is defined in
terms of the subscriber terminal:

Step 9a. Select a random street orientation from: U(0, 360˚) which also equals the direction of travel for the UE.

Step 9b. Select a random orientation for the subscriber antenna array from U(0, 360).

Step 9c. Given   0.9 the predefined fraction of UEs to experience the urban canyon effect, Select a uniform random
draw for the parameter  .

Step 9d. If     select the UE AoAs for all arriving paths to be equal, with 50% probability of being from the
direction of the street orientation obtained in step 9a, and 50% the street orientation plus an offset of 180. If   
select the directions of arrival for all paths using the standard SCM UE AoA model given in Clause 5.3, step 9.

Composite Circular Angle Spread at UE CDF (Urban Canyon)

1

0.9

0.8

0.7
Pr(RMS AS<=abscissa)

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
RMS angle Spread degrees

Figure 5.3. Simulated results of urban canyon algorithm for   0.9

3GPP
Release 14 28 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

In Figure 5.3, the urban canyon procedure is simulated to show the effects of the model on the composite UE angle
spread. The parameter   0.9 , which describes the percentage of mobiles that will experience the urban canyon
effects. The figure illustrates the result of selecting the AoAs, where each of the paths has a fixed 35˚ angle spread.

The parameter   0.9 , is set to a relatively high percentage of occurrence to emphasize the urban canyon effects,
while the remaining occurrences assume some mixed arrivals to model various other conditions such as cross streets or
where signals arrive from between buildings or from unknown paths at various angles.

5.6 Correlation between channel parameters

In [2], Greenstein presents a model for correlating delay spread (DS) with log normal shadow fading (SF). Since both
are shown to be log-normal distributed, DS and SF are generally correlated.

The result of the negative correlation between log normal shadowing and delay spread is significant because it indicates
that for a larger SF, the DS is reduced, and for a smaller SF, the DS is increased.

Cost 259[3] presents the azimuth spread (AS) as also being log-normal distributed, and likewise being correlated to the
DS and SF. Since the correlation of these parameters is quite high, a spatial channel model needs to be specified that
can reproduce this correlation behavior along with the expected probability and range of each parameter. To make sure
the model is self-consistent and the full correlation matrix is positive semi-definite, the intra-site correlations between
SF, DS and AS are as follows:

 = Correlation between DS & AS = +0.5

 = Correlation between SF & AS = -0.6

 = Correlation between SF & DS = -0.6

The resulting intra-site correlation matrix is given by A:

 1   
 
A   1   (5.6-1)
  1 


In addition to intra-site correlations given by A, there are also correlations between of these parameters between
different sites. These inter-site correlations are given by

0 0 0
Β  0 0 0 (5.6-2)
0 0  

Essentially, only inter-site correlations between SF are included.  is the SF correlation which is = 0.5.

Suppose we wish to generate the values for DS, AS, and SF for the nth base station (n = 1 … N) with respect to a given
mobile user. These values are given as  DS,n ,  AS ,n , and SF ,n , respectively. These values are a function of the
respective correlated Gaussian random variables n , n , and n . These correlated Gaussian random variables are in
turn respectively generated from independent Gaussian random variables wn1 , wn 2 , and wn 3 as well as three global
(applicable to all bases) independent Gaussian random variables 1, 2 , 3 . The variables n , n , and n are then
given by:

 n   c11 c12 c13   wn1  0 0 0   1 

    c  
 n   21 c 22 c 23   wn 2   0 0 0   2  (5.6-3)
  n  c 31 c 32 c 33   wn3  0 0    3 

where the matrix C with elements cij multiplying the w’s is given by

3GPP
Release 14 29 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

1/ 2
 1    
 
C  A  B 1 / 2   1   (5.6-4)
  1   
 

where the superscript “½” denotes the matrix square root. The distribution of DS for the nth BS is given by:

DS ,n  10 ^  DS n  DS  (5.6-5)

where n is generated above, DS  E  log10 (DS )  is the logarithmic mean of the distribution of DS, and
 DS  E log10
2
( DS , n )    2DS = is the logarithmic standard deviation of the distribution of DS.

Similarly the distribution of AS is given by:

 AS ,n  10 ^   AS n   AS  (5.6-6)

where  n is generated above,  AS  E  log10 ( AS )  is the logarithmic mean of the distribution of AS, and
 AS  E log10
2
( AS , n )    2AS is the logarithmic standard deviation of the distribution of AS.

Finally, the distribution for SF is given by:

SF ,n  10 ^  SH  n /10 (5.6-7)

where  n is given above, and  SH is the shadow fading standard deviation given in dB. The value of  SH is obtained
from analysis of the standard deviation from the regression line of the path loss versus distance. As shown in Table 5.1,
these values are 8dB and 10dB for the macro and microcell cases, respectively. Note that the dB value for SF is simply
 SH  n .

5.7 Modeling intercell interference

Sophisticated MIMO receivers account for the spatial characteristics of the signals from the desired sector as well as
from the interfering sectors. The spatial characteristics of these signals can be modeled according to the channel matrix
generated according to Clauses 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5. However, it may be prohibitively complex to explicitly model the
spatial characteristics of all interfering sectors, especially those whose received powers are relatively weak. It has been
shown that by modelling the signals of relatively weak interferers as spatially white (and thereby ignoring their spatial
characteristics), the resulting performance difference is negligible. The following four steps outline the procedure for
modelling intercell interference.

- Determine the pathloss and shadowing of all sectors. (Note that "pathloss" implicitly includes antenna patterns as
well.)

- Rank the sectors in order of received power (based on pathloss and shadowing). The base with the strongest
received power is the serving base, and the others are interfering bases.

- Model the strongest B interfering sectors as spatially correlated processes whose covariances are determined by
their channel matrices. These channel matrices are generated from Clauses 5.3, 5.4, and 5.5 and account for the
pathloss, shadowing, and fast fading variations. The way in which the channel realizations are employed depends on
the receiver algorithm and simulation methodology. For example, if only the statistics of the interfering sectors are
required, their signals can be modeled as spatially correlated additive Gaussian noise processes with covariances
determined by the channel matrices.

- Model the remaining sectors as spatially white Gaussian noise processes whose variances are based on a flat
Rayleigh fading process. Hence the variances are varying over the duration of a simulation drop.

To model the remaining "weak" sectors, we assume that the mean power of the flat Rayleigh fading process is equal to
the effects of pathloss and shadowing from each sector. Therefore if the received power from the b-th sector due to
pathloss and shadowing is Pb , then the Rayleigh fading process for the m-th receive antenna (m = 1,…, M) as a
function of time is given by rb ,m (t ) where the mean of rb ,m (t ) over time is Pb . The fading processes for each sector

3GPP
Release 14 30 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

and receive antenna are independent, and the doppler rate is determined by the speed of the mobile. We assume that the
fading is equivalent for each mobile receive antenna. The total received noise power per receive antenna due to all
"weak" sectors at the m-th antenna is

r
bF
b ,m (t ) (5.7-1)

where F is the set of indices for the "weak" sectors.

For 3-sector systems, we model the B = 8 strongest sectors. For 6-sector systems, we model B = 12 strongest sectors.
The values for B are based on simulation results for the typical cell layout with a single hexagonal cell surrounded by
two rings of cells (a total of 19 cells) and with users placed in the center cell. For other layouts, different values of B or
an entirely different technique may be required to properly account for the intercell interference.

5.8 System Level Calibration

The following examples are given for calibration purposes. A resolvable path at the receiver is assumed to be the energy
from one (or more) paths falling within one chip interval. The Chip rate in UMTS is 3.84Mcps. The PDF of the number
of resulting resolvable paths is recorded.

The following table is for interim calibration purposes. "Ideal" signifies the value taken from measurements, "Input"
signifies the value used in generating a random variable, "Output" signifies the resulting measured statistic.

Table 5.3: SCM parameter summary with simulated outputs

Suburban 5 Urban 8 Urban 15 Urban Micro

Parameter
σRND = 3dB σRND = 3dB σRND = 3dB σRND = 3dB
Input Output Input Output Output
rDS
1.4 1.29 1.7 1.54 1.7 1.54
Input Ideal Input Ideal Input Ideal
 DS
-6.80 -6.92 -6.195 -6.26 -6.195 -6.26
Input Ideal Input Ideal Input Ideal
 DS
0.288 0.363 0.18 0.25 0.18 0.25
Input Output Input Output Input Output
r AS
1.2 1.22 1.3 1.37 1.3 1.37
Input Ideal Input Ideal Input Ideal
 AS
0.69 0.66 0.810 0.75 1.18 1.0938
Input Ideal Input Ideal Input Ideal
 AS
0.13 0.18 0.34 0.37 0.21 0.2669
Ideal Output Ideal Output Ideal Output Output
E[  DS ]
0.17s 0.172s 0.65s 0.63s 0.65s 0.63s 0.251s
Ideal Output Ideal Output Ideal Output Ideal Output
E[  AS , BS ]
5 5.01 8 7.97 15 14.9 19˚ 19.2˚
Ideal Output Ideal Output Ideal Output Ideal Output
E[  AS , MS ] NLOS:
68 69.2 68 68.3 68 68.04 68
67.5

The following figures: Figure 5.4, Figure 5.5, Figure5.6, Figure 5.7, Figure 5.8, represent calibration cases for the
current SCM model. Figure 5.9 illustrates the UE composite angle spread for a variety of SCM scenarios. These
curves shown in the various figures correspond to the parameters presented in Table 5.3, and include the 3dB
randomizing factor for the generation of path powers.

3GPP
Release 14 31 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

3840000 chips/second
0.4
Urban Macro
Suburban Macro
0.35

0.3

0.25

Probability
0.2

0.15

0.1

0.05

0
1 2 3 4 5 6
Number of resolvable paths

Figure 5.4: Probability of urban and suburban time resolvable paths

In this figure, powers are combined within a chip time as a simple way to estimate the number of resolvable paths.

0.9

0.8

0.7
Pr(RMS DS<=abscissa)

0.6 Urban Macro

Urban Macro Ideal
Suburban Macro
0.5 Suburban Macro Ideal

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
RMS Delay Spread seconds -6
x 10

Figure 5.5: RMS delay spread, simulated versus ideal

3GPP
Release 14 32 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

CDF of Composite Angle Spread at Node B

1

0.9

0.8

0.7
Pr(RMS AS<=Abscissa)
0.6

0.5

0.4
Suburban Macro 5o
0.3
Suburban Macro Ideal 5o
0.2 Urban Macro 8o
Urban Macro Ideal 8o
0.1 Urban Macro 15o
Urban Macro Ideal 15o
0
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20
RMS Angle Spread, in degrees

Figure 5.6: BS composite angle spread, simulated versus ideal

Noise power3 dB
1

0.9

0.8

0.7
Pr(Dynamic Range<=abscissa)

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3
Urban Macro w/o Quantization
Urban Macro Resolvable
0.2 Suburban Macro w/o Quantization
Suburban Macro Resolvable

0.1

0
0 5 10 15 20 25
Dynamic Range dB

Figure 5.7: Dynamic range (dB) for each channel model

3GPP
Release 14 33 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

0
Noise power3 dB
10

-1
10
Pr(Path Power<=abscissa)

-2
10

Urban Macro w/o Quantization

Urban Macro Resolvable
Suburban Macro w/o Quantization
Suburban Macro Resolvable

-3
10
-30 -25 -20 -15 -10 -5 0
Path Power dB

Figure 5.8: CDF of all path powers

Circular Angle Spread Approach at UE

1

0.9

0.8

0.7

0.6
Pr(AS<=abscissa)

0.5

0.4
Urban Macro Avg.=68.04o
Suburban Macro Avg.=69.21o
0.3
Urban Canyon Avg.=38.51o
Micro LOS Avg.=62.48o
0.2 Micro NLOS Avg.=67.45o
Far Scatterer Cluster Avg.=64.25o
0.1

0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
Angle Spread degrees

Figure 5.9: CDF of MS angle spread for various SCM scenarios (circular AS calculation)

3GPP
Release 14 34 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Channel Scenario: Urban Microcellular

A number of parameters are shown in the following plots which are the result of simulations. Figure 5.10 illustrates the
dynamic range of each channel realization, plotted as a complementary cdf. The difference between the 1.25 MHz and
5 MHz channel bandwidths are shown in the resolvable dynamic range curves. (Powers are combined within a chip
time as a simple way to estimate the resolvable powers.) The 1% highest value is approximately the same for both
bandwidths. The dynamic range D is calculated from D = 10*log10(max pwr / min pwr) for each channel realization.

CCDF Dynamic Range of individual channel realizations

0
10
CCDF Probability path power dyn range > Abscissa

delays: U(0, 1200nS)

1x 3x path sigma: 3dB
-1
10

Individual Path Powers

-2
10

-3
10
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Power in dBr

Figure 5.10: Dynamic range of path powers per channel realization, (NLOS)

Base Angle Spread

1
K = 13 dB

0.9

0.8
Probability AS < Abscissa

0.7

0.6

0.5
Mix

0.4

0.3
K = -inf dB
0.2

0.1

0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Angle Spread in Degrees

Figure 5.11: Composite BS angle spread

3GPP
Release 14 35 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

The composite angle spread at the base is described in Figure 5.11 for the various K-factors that are seen in the micro-
cell model, along with the LOS/NLOS mix expected when the cell radius is 500m (as measured from the cell center to
cell corner). For the NLOS case, the average composite Base AS = 19 degrees. When experiencing LOS paths with
increased K-factors, the angle spreads are observed to decreased accordingly. The simulated average composite Base
AS for the NLOS model is: 19.2 degrees, and the simulated average composite Base AS for the mixed propagation
model is: 17.6 degrees.

Composite Circular Angle Spread at UE CDF

1

0.9

0.8

0.7
Pr(RMS AS<=abscissa)

0.6

0.5
K=-inf
Mix
0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

0
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110
RMS angle Spread degrees

Figure 5.12: Composite MS angle spread

The composite UE angle spread is described in Figure 5.12 for increased K-factor from a LOS path, causes the
composite AS to be decreased since more power is present in a single direct component. The mixed case is shown
which has a slight decrease in the statistics due to the 15% of the locations experiencing the LOS condition (assuming a
cell radius of 500m). The simulated average composite UE AS for the NLOS model is: 67.45 degrees, and the
simulated average composite UE AS for the mixed propagation model is: 62.48 degrees.

The delay spread is illustrated in Figure 5.13, which is also affected by the presence of a direct path. The mix is
produced by the combination of LOS and NLOS paths. The simulated average delay spread for the NLOS condition is:
251 nS, and the simulated average delay spread for the mixed case is: 231 nS

3GPP
Release 14 36 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Delay Spread
1
K = 13 dB

0.9

0.8
Probability DS < Abscissa

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4
Mix
0.3

0.2

0.1
K = -inf dB
0
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Delay Spread in Seconds x 10
-7

Figure 5.13: Micro-cell delay spread

Figure 5.14 illustrates the propagation path loss model of the urban microcell which is characterized by the mixed mode
between LOS and NLOS.

3GPP
Release 14 37 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Path Loss versus Distance

160

140

120
Path Loss in dB

100

80

60

40
1 2
10 10
Distance in meters

Figure 5.14: Microcell path loss versus distance

3GPP
Release 14 38 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Annex A:
Calculation of circular angle spread
For a signal with N multi-paths, each has M sub-paths, the conventional angle spread calculation for the composite
signal is given by

  
N M
 Pn , m
2
n, m, 
 AS  n 1 m 1
N M
(A-1)
 P
n 1 m 1
n, m

where Pn , m is the power for the mth subpath of the nth path,  n ,m , is defined as

 n, m,   mod  n, m     , 2    , (A-2)

 is defined as

N M

 n ,m  Pn,m
  n1 m1
N M
(A-3)
 P
n1 m1
n ,m

and  n, m is the AoA (or AoD) of the mth subpath of the nth path. Note that we have dropped the AoA (AoD) subscript
for convenience.

We note that the angle spread should be independent of a linear shift in the AoAs. In other words, by replacing  n, m
with  n,m   , the angle spread  AS   which is now a function of  should actually be constant no matter what 
is. However, due to the ambiguity of the modulo 2π operation, this may not be the case. Therefore the angle spread
should be the minimum of  AS   over all  :

   2  Pn, m
N M

n, m, 
 AS  min  AS    n 1 m 1
N M (A-4)

 P
n 1 m 1
n, m

where  n ,m ,    is defined as

 n, m,     mod  n, m         , 2    , (A-5)

   is defined as

N M

    P n, m n, m
    n 1 m 1
N M (A-6)
 P
n 1 m 1
n, m

and  n, m    mod  n, m     , 2    .

3GPP
Release 14 39 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

3GPP
Release 14 40 3GPP TR 25.996 V14.0.0 (2017-03)

Annex B:
Change history

Change history
Date Meeting TDoc CR Rev Cat Subject/Comment New
version
2003-06 RP_20 RP-030311 Approved as a Release 6 technical report 6.0.0
2003-09 RP_21 RP-030461 0001 2 F Corrections and clarifications to Spatial Channel Model Technical 6.1.0
Report
2007-06 SP_36 - Update to Rel-7 7.0.0
2008-12 RAN_42 - Update to Rel-8 8.0.0
2009-12 SP_46 - Update to Rel-9 9.0.0
2011-03 SP_51 - Update to Rel-10 10.0.0
2012-09 SP_57 Update to Rel-11 version (MCC) 11.0.0
2014-09 SP_65 Update to Rel-12 version (MCC) 12.0.0
2015-12 SP_70 Update to Rel-13 version (MCC) 13.0.0
2016-12 RAN#74 RP-162372 0002 - D TR25.996_CR_Equation_Numbering 13.1.0
2017-03 RAN#75 RP-170621 0004 - F TR25.996_CR_Correction_of_Circular_Angle_Spread 13.2.0
2017-03 RAN#75 RP-170621 0005 - F TR25.996_CR_Correction_of_Channel_Coefficient_Indexes 13.2.0

Change history
Date Meeting TDoc CR Rev Cat Subject/Comment New
version
2017-03 SA#75 - - - - Promotion to Release 14 without technical change (MCC) 14.0.0

3GPP