We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3
Nitishastra (Sanskrit: नीति शास्त्र) refers to the traditional Indian treatises on ethics,
politics, and moral conduct. It literally translates to "the science of conduct."
Nitishastra encompasses various texts, scriptures, and writings that provide guidance on how an individual should behave ethically and morally in both personal and societal contexts. These teachings are rooted in ancient Indian wisdom, often influenced by Hindu philosophy, and aim to promote righteousness, justice, and virtuous living. Difference between Niti (Indian Morality) and Western Morality: 1. Source of Morality: o Niti (Indian Morality): Niti is deeply rooted in dharma (righteous duty) and is influenced by religious texts such as the Vedas, Upanishads, Mahabharata, Ramayana, and Arthashastra. It emphasizes living in harmony with cosmic order and societal duty (dharma). The focus is on righteousness (dharma), karma (action and its consequences), and spiritual progress. o Western Morality: Western morality is largely influenced by Enlightenment principles, Christian theology, Greek philosophy (like Plato and Aristotle), and later, secular humanism. It often emphasizes individual rights, universal principles of justice, and equality, focusing on personal autonomy, reason, and ethics as derived from social contracts. 2. Focus on Community vs. Individual: o Niti: Indian ethics place a strong emphasis on collective well-being and community responsibility. The individual’s moral actions are viewed in relation to family, society, and the larger cosmic order. In Niti, duty to others (dharma) is paramount, and individuals are encouraged to prioritize the welfare of the community over self-interest. o Western Morality: Western ethics, especially in modern times, often emphasize the individual's rights and autonomy. Morality is framed in terms of personal freedom, consent, and individual choice. Western philosophy gives greater emphasis to individual happiness and the protection of individual rights. 3. Relativity vs. Absolutism: o Niti: Indian morality often allows for flexibility based on context. Moral rules (niti) can be adapted depending on the situation, and the concept of "yuga dharma" (changing ethics for different eras) exists. For instance, a ruler might be justified in employing different standards of ethics compared to a common citizen, as seen in texts like the Arthashastra by Kautilya. o Western Morality: While some Western ethical systems, like utilitarianism or situation ethics, do allow for flexibility, many Western approaches (especially Kantian ethics) emphasize universal moral principles that apply to everyone equally, regardless of circumstances. There is a focus on moral absolutism, where certain actions are right or wrong regardless of context. 4. Spiritual vs. Secular Focus: o Niti: Indian morality is deeply intertwined with spirituality and metaphysical concepts. The actions performed in this life (karma) are believed to affect future reincarnations, and adhering to dharma is not just for societal harmony but also for spiritual liberation (moksha). Therefore, morality is tied to the cosmic order and spiritual progress. o Western Morality: Though originally tied to religious doctrines in Christianity and Judaism, Western morality has become increasingly secular, particularly in the modern period. Ethical frameworks like Kantian ethics, utilitarianism, and virtue ethics focus on human reason, societal well-being, and individual flourishing without necessarily invoking spiritual or religious aspects. 5. Goal of Morality: o Niti: The ultimate goal of morality in Indian philosophy is often aligned with achieving moksha (liberation from the cycle of birth and death) and living in harmony with the dharma. Ethical conduct is a means to purify the soul and progress spiritually. o Western Morality: In many Western ethical frameworks, the goal is the well-being of individuals and society, often framed in terms of happiness, justice, or the fulfillment of one’s potential. For instance, utilitarianism focuses on maximizing happiness, while Kantian ethics stresses acting in accordance with moral laws that could be universally applied. 6. Role of Consequences: o Niti: In Indian ethics, consequences of actions (karma) are a crucial part of moral evaluation. The long-term cosmic consequences of one’s actions are considered, and even if a moral action leads to immediate discomfort or loss, it may still be right if it aligns with dharma and leads to favorable karmic results. o Western Morality: Consequentialism is one school of thought within Western ethics, particularly in utilitarianism, which focuses on the outcomes of actions (whether they lead to the greatest good for the greatest number). However, deontological ethics (like Kant’s) focuses on the intention behind actions, rather than their consequences.