See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.

net/publication/385416295

A new generalization of interval-valued Q-neutrosophic soft matrix and its

applications

Article · January 2025

DOI: 10.54216/IJNS.250322

CITATIONS READS

0 85

3 authors:

Yousef Al-Qudah Abdulqader Othman

Amman Arab University Koya University
32 PUBLICATIONS 441 CITATIONS 12 PUBLICATIONS 54 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE

Faisal Al-Sharqi
University of Anbar
85 PUBLICATIONS 728 CITATIONS

SEE PROFILE

All content following this page was uploaded by Faisal Al-Sharqi on 31 October 2024.

The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file.

International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025

A new generalization of interval-valued Q-neutrosophic soft

matrix and its applications

Yousef Al-Qudah1, *, Abdulqader O. Hamadameen2, Nadia Abdalla Kh3, Faisal Al-Sharqi4, 5

1
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Arts and Science, Amman Arab University, Amman, Jordan
2
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science and Health, Koya University, Danielle Mitterrand Boulevard,
Koya KOY45, Kurdistan Region - F.R. Iraq
3
Alryaiyna College of Science and Technecal, Alryaiyna west Mountain, Libya
4
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Education for Pure Sciences, University of Anbar, Ramadi, Anbar, Iraq.
5
College of Pharmacy, National University of Science and Technology, Dhi Qar, Iraq

Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];

[email protected]

Abstract
Decision-making theory is an effective way to help the decision-maker take the right path to solve a problem.
Among the applications of this theory is the medical field, i.e. allowing the decision maker (doctor) to analyze
patient data and judge the result of this analysis as to whether the patient is infected or not. In this path and to
enrich this theory with more flexible mathematical methods, we present in this work a more flexible expanded
method for a previous concept called Interval-valued Q-neutrosophic soft matrix (IV-Q-NSM) as a new
generalization of previous mathematical tools. These tools deal with the two-dimensional uncertainty issues that
exist in many areas of life. Next, some ordinary algebraic properties and matrix operations have also been studied.
After that, we present a new methodology for the decision-making (DM) selection problems in medical diagnoses.
Keywords: Neutrosophic set; Q- neutrosophic set; Q-neutrosophic soft matrix; interval-valued neutrosophic set;
soft set; Interval-valued neutrosophic soft set

1. Introduction

In this contemporary world, researchers and practitioners work together in different scientific areas to find
solutions using efficient and effective decision-making. Individuals sometimes make quick decisions, but some
decisions require a well-designed method that fits the problem environment. Some risks and uncertainties may
arise during the decision-making process. Factors such as vagueness, uncertainty, and ambiguity can make the
decision-making process more complex in real-life problems. In this context, experts incorporate special theories,
new approaches, and methodologies to understand circumstances and evaluate alternatives before selecting the
most appropriate one. From macro to micro levels, the decision-making process is not only used in scientific
research areas but has also been applied to different fields such as finance, economics, games, and marketing. The
first researcher to deal with this environment was Zadeh [1] when he presented the fuzzy sets (FS) theory as an
extension of a traditional set (crisp set). With FS, Zadeh gives every component in fuzziness environment one
membership degree belonged [0,1]. This concept has inspired researchers and prompted them to present a large
number of studies in various fields [2-5]. Day by day life situations are becoming more complicated, so it is
necessary to create new mathematical tools or develop existing ones and so Smarandache [6] in 1998 presented a
new theory called neutrosophic set (NS) theory that is considered an advanced glimpse of Zadeh's previous theory.
With NS, Smarandache gives every component in fuzziness environment three membership degrees all of them
belonged [0,1]. Deli [7] introduced the concept of an interval-valued neutrosophic soft set (IV-NSS) as an

242

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025
extension of both NSs and soft sets (SSs). Al-Sharqi et al [8] put up IV-NSS with some mathematical tools like
algebra [9,10], graph [11,12], complex [13,14], and possibility [15,16]. Follow these works Al-Quran et al [17]
combin' NSs with some fuzziness extensions [18,19]. Ali and Mohammed [20,21] introduce new topological tools
for fuzzy neutrosophic environments. Palanikumar et al. [22,23] combine NSs with many mathematical tools to
increase the accuracy of MCDM methods. Al-Qudah et al. [24,25] handled complex uncertainty sets in DM
problems when they presented some complex uncertainty works [26,27]. Furthermore, when information is
converted from human knowledge to mathematical formulas and vice versa, its representation retains its entire
meaning. Accordingly, these tools have been applied in many life fields such as science [28,29],
engineering[30,31], and administrative sciences[32,33]. Recently Ghazi and Al-Salihi [34] introduced a new hyper
model known as IV-Q-NSSs as both SS and NSs under interval setting Q-two-dimensional universal information
[35,36]. In this work we reintroduce the concept of matrix but in the form of a matrix in order to benefit as much
as possible from the properties and advantages of the techniques present in the matrix when we proposed a new
model called IV-QNS-Matrix.

2. Basic definitions and background

Definition 2.1 [1]: A following structure

called NS on universal set V. Such that N = 𝑃̂𝑡 (v𝑗 ), 𝑃̂ 𝑖 (v𝑗 ), 𝑃̂𝑓 (v𝑗 ): V → [0,1] and 𝑃̂𝑡 (v𝑗 ), 𝑃̂𝑖 (v𝑗 ), 𝑃̂𝑓 (v𝑗 ) ∈ [0,1].

Definition 2.2 [1]: A following structure

𝔣 𝔣
called Q-NS on Q× V. Such that N𝔔 = 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡 (𝑣, 𝔮), 𝑃̂𝔔𝔦 (𝑣, 𝔮), 𝑃̂𝔔 (𝑣, 𝔮): V → [0,1] and 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡 (𝑣, 𝔮), 𝑃̂𝔔𝔦 (𝑣, 𝔮), 𝑃̂𝔔 (𝑣, 𝔮) ∈
[0,1].

Definition 2.3 [1]: A following structure

𝔣
called IV-Q-NS on Q× V. Such that IVN𝔔 = 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡 (𝑣, 𝔮), 𝑃̂𝔔𝔦 (𝑣, 𝔮), 𝑃̂𝔔 (𝑣, 𝔮): V → [0,1]
̂ 𝑡 ̂ 𝔦 ̂ 𝔣
and𝑃𝔔 (𝑣, 𝔮), 𝑃𝔔 (𝑣, 𝔮), 𝑃𝔔 (𝑣, 𝔮) ∈ [0,1].

Example 2.4 Let V = {v1 , v2 , v3 } present three houses we are interested to analyzing their attractiveness that one
person (user) is wishes to buying one of them and 𝒬 = {𝓆1 , 𝓆2 } be a set constituting two cities and ℰ = {ℯ1 , ℯ2 , 𝑒3 }
be a collection of attribute of these three houses. Now, let us evaluate this attractiveness according to our model
(𝐼𝑉 − 𝒬 − 𝑁𝑆𝑆) as following:

243

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025

̂𝒬 =
𝔓 ̅
Α

〈[0.2,0.8], [0.1,0.7], [0.4,0.8]〉 〈[0.1,0.4], [0.5,0.8], [0.7,0.8]〉

{(𝔢1 , ,
(v1 , 𝓆1 ) (v1 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.3,0.6], [0.2,0.7], [0.5,0.8]〉 〈[0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.9], [0.5,0.7]〉

,
(v2 , 𝓆1 ) (v2 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.1,0.5], [0.3,0.7], [0.2,0.8]〉 〈[0.4,0.8], [0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.8]〉

, )
(v3 , 𝓆1 ) (v3 , 𝓆)

〈[0.1,0.8], [0.5,0.7], [0.3,0.4]〉 〈[0.1,0.8], [0.4,0.7], [0.2,0.6]〉

(𝔢2 , ,
(v1 , 𝓆1 ) (v1 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.5,0.8], [0.4,0.9], [0.2,0.7]〉 〈[0.1,0.2], [0.2,0.5], [0.4,0.7]〉

,
(v2 , 𝓆1 ) (v2 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.1,0.4], [0.2,0.5], [0.3,0.7]〉 〈[0.1,0.6], [0.4,0.5], [0.5,0.7]〉

, )
(𝑣, 𝓆1 ) (v3 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.7,0.9], [0.2,0.8], [0.3,0.6]〉 〈[0.4,0.7], [0.2,0.5], [0.1,0.7]〉

(𝔢3 , ,
(v1 , 𝓆1 ) (v1 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.1,0.8], [0.1,0.4], [0.3,0.6]〉 〈[0.5,0.6], [0.3,0.6], [0.2,0.7]〉

,
(v2 , 𝓆1 ) (v2 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.7], [0.3,0.6]〉 〈[0.4,0.8], [0.8,0.9], [0.3,0.7]〉

, )}
(v3 , 𝓆1 ) (v3 , 𝓆2 )

3. An IV-Q-NSs in Matrix Form

In this section, we will demonstrate the algebraic ability with our proposed concept by presenting our proposed
concept in this thesis with a matrix system.

̅ , < 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡 (𝑣̂, 𝔮̆)(ℯ) > |(𝑣̂, 𝔮̆) ∈V × 𝔔} ∈ IV − Q − NSS(V).Then, the IV-Q-NSs in
Definition 3.1. Let 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ = {ℯ ∈ Α
matrix form given as a following matrix :

∖ ℯ1 ℯ1 … ℯ𝑚
(𝑣̂1 , 𝔮̆1 ) 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ 1,2
Α
… 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅
1,1 1,𝑗

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = (𝑣̂2 , 𝔮̆2 ) 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ … 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅

𝑚×𝑛 2,1 2,2 2,𝑗
⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮ ⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮ ⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮ ⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮⋮
(𝑣
̂ , 𝔮
̆ ) ̂
𝑃 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ … 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅
[ 𝑛 𝑗 𝔔Α
̅ 𝑖,2
𝑖,1 𝑖,𝑗 ]
𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
Where 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ = ⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ],[𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩
𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗

, 𝑖 = 1,2,3, … , 𝑛 number of Rows and 𝑗 = 1,2,3, … , 𝑚 number of Columns.

244

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025
Example 3.2. Assume that the values given in the example 2.4 are as follows:

̂𝒬 =
𝔓 ̅
Α

〈[0.2,0.8], [0.1,0.7], [0.4,0.8]〉 〈[0.1,0.4], [0.5,0.8], [0.7,0.8]〉

{(𝔢1 , ,
(v1 , 𝓆1 ) (v1 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.3,0.6], [0.2,0.7], [0.5,0.8]〉 〈[0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.9], [0.5,0.7]〉

,
(v2 , 𝓆1 ) (v2 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.1,0.5], [0.3,0.7], [0.2,0.8]〉 〈[0.4,0.8], [0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.8]〉

, )
(v3 , 𝓆1 ) (v3 , 𝓆)

〈[0.1,0.8], [0.5,0.7], [0.3,0.4]〉 〈[0.1,0.8], [0.4,0.7], [0.2,0.6]〉

(𝔢2 , ,
(v1 , 𝓆1 ) (v1 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.5,0.8], [0.4,0.9], [0.2,0.7]〉 〈[0.1,0.2], [0.2,0.5], [0.4,0.7]〉

,
(v2 , 𝓆1 ) (v2 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.1,0.4], [0.2,0.5], [0.3,0.7]〉 〈[0.1,0.6], [0.4,0.5], [0.5,0.7]〉

, )
(𝑣, 𝓆1 ) (v3 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.7,0.9], [0.2,0.8], [0.3,0.6]〉 〈[0.4,0.7], [0.2,0.5], [0.1,0.7]〉

(𝔢3 , ,
(v1 , 𝓆1 ) (v1 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.1,0.8], [0.1,0.4], [0.3,0.6]〉 〈[0.5,0.6], [0.3,0.6], [0.2,0.7]〉

,
(v2 , 𝓆1 ) (v2 , 𝓆2 )

〈[0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.7], [0.3,0.6]〉 〈[0.4,0.8], [0.8,0.9], [0.3,0.7]〉

, )}
(v3 , 𝓆1 ) (v3 , 𝓆2 )

Now, through the definition 3.1, these values can be represented as a matrix as follows:

∖ 𝑒1 𝑒2 𝑒3
(𝔲1 , 𝔮1 ) 〈[0.2,0.5]〉 〈[0.2,0.2]〉 〈[0.5,0.8]〉
(𝔲1 , 𝔮2 ) 〈[0.1,0.4]〉 〈[0.1,0.8]〉 〈[0.4,0.7]〉
[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = (𝔲2 , 𝔮1 ) 〈[0.3,0.4]〉 〈[0.5,0.8]〉 〈[0.3,0.6]〉
6×3
(𝔲2 , 𝔮2 ) 〈[0.6,0.8]〉 〈[0.1,0.2]〉 〈[0.5,0.6]〉
(𝔲3 , 𝔮1 ) 〈[0.1,0.5]〉 〈[0.2,0.5]〉 〈[0.3,0.6]〉
[(𝔲3 , 𝔮2 ) 〈[0.4,0.8]〉 〈[0.4,0.5]〉 〈[0.4,0.8]〉]6×3

In the above matrix, the row represents a set of ℰ = {ℯ1 , ℯ2 , 𝑒3 }, while the column represents a set of both 𝔘 =
{𝔲1 , 𝔲2 , 𝔲3 } and 𝔔 = {𝔮1 , 𝔮2 }.

Definition 3.3 Let [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] and [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] be two IV-Q-NSMs, where [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] =
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩] and[𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] =
Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐵 ]⟩] for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑟, 𝑗 = 1,2, … , 𝑠. Then we have the
B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
following point:

245

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025

1. [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] is called zero-IV-Q-NSM if [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = [⟨[0, 0], [1, 1], [1, 1⟩]𝑚×𝑛 .
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

2. [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] is absolute-IV-Q-NSM if [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = [⟨[1, 1], [0, 0], [0, 0⟩]𝑚×𝑛 .

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

3. An IV-Q-NSM [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] is IV-Q-NS-submatrix [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] and denoted by [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ⊆ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] if

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢
the degrees: 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ ≤ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
≤ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
, 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ ≥ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ≥ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ and 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ≥ 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ≥ 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ .
Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

4. A square IV-Q-NSM [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] has a transpose by exchange of rows and columns of [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] and it
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑡
denoted by [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] such that
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑡 𝑡
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = [⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
𝑡
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
= [⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩] .
Α𝑗,𝑖 Α𝑗,𝑖 Α𝑗,𝑖 Α𝑗,𝑖 Α𝑗,𝑖 Α𝑗,𝑖
𝑚×𝑛

5. A square IV-Q-NSM [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] is denoted by symmetric square IV-Q-NSM if 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ = 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ i.e
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑗,𝑖
𝑡
[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] .
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

Definition 3.4 Let [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] and [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] be two IV-Q-NSMs, where [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] =
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩] ,[𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] =
Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐵 ]⟩] and[𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =
B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩] for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑟, 𝑗 = 1,2, … , 𝑠. Then, the fundamental
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
algebraic operations on IV-Q-NSM are defined as follows:

1. Addition: The addition operation of two IV-Q-NSM is defined as follow:

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] + [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩]
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
Where
𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ = 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ + 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ − 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ × 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
= 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
+ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
− 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
× 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
,
C𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ = 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ × 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ = 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ × 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅

C 𝑖,𝑗 Α 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗 C 𝑖,𝑗 Α 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢
𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ = 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ × 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ = 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ × 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ .
C𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

2. Subtraction: The operation of subtraction of two IV-Q-NSMs is defined as follows:

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] − [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩]
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
Where
𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙 = |𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙
̅ ̅
− 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ |, 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
= |𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
− 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
|,
C 𝑖,𝑗 Α 𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ = 𝑚𝑎𝑥 (𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ ),𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ = 𝑚𝑎𝑥 (𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ )

C 𝑖,𝑗 Α 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗 C 𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢

𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ = |𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ − 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ |, 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ = |𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ − 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ |.
C𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

246

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
 International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025
3. Multiplication: The operation of multiplication for two IV-Q-NSMs are defined as follows:

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] × [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩]
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
Where
𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ = 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ × 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ ,𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
= 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
× 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
C𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ = 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ + 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ − 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ × 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ = 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ + 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ − 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ × 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅
C 𝑖,𝑗 Α 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗 Α 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗 C 𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢
𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ = 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ + 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ − 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ × 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ = 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ + 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ − 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ × 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅
C 𝑖,𝑗 Α 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗 Α 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗 C 𝑖,𝑗 Α 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗 Α 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗
4. Scalar Multiplication: The operation of scalar multiplication for two IV-Q-NSMs are defined as follows:

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
𝐾 [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = [⟨[𝐾𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝐾𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝐾𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , K 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝐾𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝐾𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛

Where 𝐾 ∈ 𝑅.

5. Arithmetic mean: The arithmetic mean of two IV-Q-NSMs is defined as follows:

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ⊛ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩]
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒
𝑡,𝑙 𝑡,𝑙 𝑡,𝑢 𝑡,𝑢 𝑖,𝑙 𝑖,𝑙 𝑖,𝑢 𝑖,𝑢
𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔 𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔 𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔 𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔
̅
Α ̅
B ̅
Α ̅
B ̅
Α ̅
B ̅
Α ̅
B
𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
= , ̅
= , = , ̅
=
C 𝑖,𝑗 2 C 𝑖,𝑗 2 C 𝑖,𝑗 2 C 𝑖,𝑗 2

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢

𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔 𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔
̅
Α ̅
B ̅
Α ̅
B
𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
= ̅
=
C𝑖,𝑗 2 C𝑖,𝑗 2

6. Weighted arithmetic mean: The weighted arithmetic mean of two IV-Q-NSMs is defined as follows:

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ⊛𝑤 [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩]
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒
𝑡,𝑙 𝑡,𝑙 𝑡,𝑢 𝑡,𝑢 𝑖,𝑙 𝑖,𝑙
𝑤𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑤𝑃̂𝔔 ̂𝔔
𝑤𝑃 +𝑤𝑃̂𝔔 𝑤𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑤𝑃̂𝔔
̅
Α ̅
B ̅
Α ̅
B ̅
Α ̅
B
𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
= ̅
= =
C𝑖,𝑗 2 C𝑖,𝑗 2 C𝑖,𝑗 2
𝑖,𝑢 𝑖,𝑢 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 ̂ 𝑓,𝑢 +𝑤𝑃̂𝑓,𝑢
̂𝔔
𝑤𝑃 ̂𝔔
+𝑤𝑃 𝑤𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑤𝑃̂𝔔 𝑤𝑃𝔔 𝔔
̅
Α ̅
B ̅
Α ̅
B ̅
Α ̅
B
𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
, ̅
= = , ̅
= , where 𝑤 ∈ 𝑅.
C 𝑖,𝑗 2 C 𝑖,𝑗 2 C 𝑖,𝑗 2
7. Geometric mean: The geometric of two IV-Q-NSMs is defined as follows:
[𝑃̂𝔔 ] ⊚ [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]
̅
Α
= [𝑃̂𝔔 ] = B𝑖,𝑗 ̅
C
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩]
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒

𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ = √𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ . 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ ,𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢

̅
= √𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
. 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
, 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ = √𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ . 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ ,𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
= √𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ . 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅
C𝑖,𝑗 A B𝑖,𝑗
𝑖,𝑗 C 𝑖,𝑗 A B 𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 A 𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 C 𝑖,𝑗 A B𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢

𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ = √𝑃̂𝔔A̅ . 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ,𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
= √𝑃̂𝔔A̅ . 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅
C 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗 C 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗

247

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025
8. Weighted Geometric mean: The weighted geometric of two IV-Q-NSMs is defined as follows:

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ⊚𝑤 [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩]
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒

̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙
𝑤𝑃 = √𝑤𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ . 𝑤𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ ,𝑤𝑃
̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 = √𝑤𝑃
̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 . 𝑤𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 ,
̅ C𝑖,𝑗 A B𝑖,𝑗 ̅
C A̅ B̅
𝑖,𝑗𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗

̂ 𝔔𝑖,𝑙
𝑤𝑃 = 𝑖,𝑙
√𝑤𝑃̂𝔔A̅ . 𝑤𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ ̂ 𝔔𝑡,𝑢
,𝑤𝑃 = ̂ 𝔔𝑖,𝑢
√𝑤𝑃 . 𝑤𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅
̅
C B ̅
C ̅
A B𝑖,𝑗
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗

̂𝔔𝑓,𝑙 = √𝑤𝑃
𝑤𝑃 ̂ 𝑓,𝑙 . 𝑤𝑃
̂ 𝑓,𝑙 ,𝑤𝑃
̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 = √𝑤𝑃̂ 𝑓,𝑢 . 𝑤𝑃̂ 𝑓,𝑢 .
̅
C 𝔔A
̅ 𝔔B
̅ ̅
C 𝔔A̅ 𝔔B̅
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
9. Harmonic mean: The Harmonic mean of two IV-Q-NSMs is defined as follows:

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ⊡ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩]
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒
𝑡,𝑙 𝑡,𝑙 𝑡,𝑢 𝑡,𝑢 𝑖,𝑙 𝑖,𝑙 𝑖,𝑢 𝑖,𝑢
2𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔 2𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔 2𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔 2𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔
̅
A ̅
B A̅ ̅
B A̅ B̅ ̅
A ̅
B
𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ ,𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ ,𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ =
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
= 𝑡,𝑙 𝑡,𝑙 = 𝑡,𝑢 𝑡,𝑢 = 𝑖,𝑙 𝑖,𝑙 𝑖,𝑢 𝑖,𝑢
C𝑖,𝑗 𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ C𝑖,𝑗 𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔
A̅ ̅
B ̅
A𝑖,𝑗 ̅
B𝑖,𝑗 ̅
A𝑖,𝑗 ̅
B𝑖,𝑗 ̅
A𝑖,𝑗 ̅
B𝑖,𝑗
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢
2𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔 2𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔
̅
A ̅
B ̅
A ̅
B
𝑓,𝑙 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑓,𝑢 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ = 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 ,𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ = 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢
C 𝑖,𝑗 ̂
𝑃𝔔 +𝑃𝔔 ̂ C 𝑖,𝑗 𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔
A̅ ̅
B ̅
A ̅
B
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗

10. Weighted Harmonic mean: The Weighted Harmonic mean of two IV-Q-NSMs is defined as follows:

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ⊡𝑊 [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩]
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
𝑊ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒
𝑡,𝑙 𝑡,𝑙 𝑡,𝑢 𝑡,𝑢 𝑖,𝑙 𝑖,𝑙
2𝑊𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔 2𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔 2𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔
̅
A ̅
B A̅ ̅
B A̅ B̅
𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ ),𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ ),𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ =
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
= 𝑊( ̂ 𝑡,𝑙 ̂ 𝑡,𝑙 ̅
=𝑊( ̂ 𝑡,𝑢 ̂ 𝑡,𝑢 ), = 𝑊( ̂ 𝑖,𝑙 ̂ 𝑖,𝑙
C 𝑖,𝑗 𝑃𝔔 +𝑃𝔔 C 𝑖,𝑗 𝑃𝔔 +𝑃𝔔 C 𝑖,𝑗 𝑃𝔔 +𝑃𝔔 C𝑖,𝑗
̅
A ̅
B ̅
A ̅
B A̅ ̅
B
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑖,𝑢 𝑖,𝑢 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢
2𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔 2𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔 2𝑃̂𝔔 .𝑃̂𝔔
̅
A ̅
B ̅
A ̅
B ̅
A ̅
B
𝑖,𝑗𝑖,𝑗 𝑓,𝑙 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑓,𝑢 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑊( 𝑖,𝑢 𝑖,𝑢 ) , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ = 𝑊 ( 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 ),𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ = 𝑊 ( 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢 ),W∈ 𝑅.
𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑃̂𝔔 +𝑃̂𝔔
̅
A𝑖,𝑗 ̅
B𝑖,𝑗 ̅
A ̅
B ̅
A ̅
B
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗

Proposition 3.5 : Let [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] and [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] be two IV-Q-NSMs, where [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] =
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩] ,[𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] =
Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐵 ]⟩] and[𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =
B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩] for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑟, 𝑗 = 1,2, … , 𝑠. Then, the following point
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
have been satsfied:

1. For both 𝛼, 𝛽 ∈ 𝑅 then 𝛼 (𝛽 [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ) = 𝛼. 𝛽 ([𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ).

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

248

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025

2. For 𝛼 ≤ 𝛽 then 𝛼 [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ≤ 𝛽 [𝑃̂𝔔B ] .

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

3. If [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ≤ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] then 𝛼 [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ≤ 𝛽 [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] .

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑡 𝑡
4. (𝛼 [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ) = 𝛼 [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] .
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑡 𝑡
5. ([𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ) = [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] .
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

Prof (1). Take

̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙 , 𝛽 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 ] , [𝛽𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙 , 𝛽𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢 ] , [𝛽𝑃̂ 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢

𝛼 (𝛽 [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ) = 𝛼 [⟨[𝛽𝑃 ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅
̂
𝔔 ̅ , 𝛽𝑃𝔔 ̅ ]⟩]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛

̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙 , 𝛼𝛽 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 ] , [𝛼𝛽𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙 , 𝛼𝛽𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢 ] , [𝛼𝛽𝑃̂ ̂ 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢

= [⟨[𝛼𝛽𝑃 ̅ ̅ ̅ ̅ 𝔔 ̅ , 𝛼𝛽𝑃𝔔 ̅ ]⟩]
Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
= 𝛼𝛽 [⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩] = 𝛼𝛽 [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] .
Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛

Prof (3). Suppose that [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ≤ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] then 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ ≤ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
≤ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
, 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ ≥ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ≥
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢
𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ and 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ≥ 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ≥ 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ .
B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

Now for 𝛼 ∈ 𝑅, then

𝛼𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ ≤ 𝛼𝑃
̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙 ,𝛼 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 ≤ 𝛼𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 , 𝛼𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙 ≥ 𝛼𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ 𝑃̂ 𝑖,𝑢 ≥ 𝛼𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ and
Α𝑖,𝑗 ̅ ̅B𝑖,𝑗 ̅ ̅
Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 ,𝛼 𝔔Α
̅
𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢 𝑓,𝑢
𝛼𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ≥ 𝛼𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝛼𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ≥ 𝛼𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ .
Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

Then 𝛼 [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ≤ 𝛼 [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] .

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑡
̂𝔔 ]
Prof (4). We have ([𝛼𝑃 ) ∈ 𝐼𝑉 − 𝑄 − 𝑁𝑆𝑀, then
̅
Α 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑡
̂𝔔 ]
([𝛼𝑃 ̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙 , 𝛼 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢 ] , [𝛼𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙 , 𝛼𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢 ] , [𝛼𝑃̂𝔔𝑓,𝑙 , 𝛼𝑃̂𝔔𝑓,𝑢 ]⟩]
) = [⟨[𝛼𝑃
̅
Α ̅ ̅ ̅ Α𝑗,𝑖 ̅ ̅
Α𝑗,𝑖 ̅ Α𝑗,𝑖 Α𝑗,𝑖 Α𝑗,𝑖 Α𝑗,𝑖
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛

𝑡
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
= 𝛼 ([⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩])
Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗

𝑡
̂𝔔 ]
= 𝛼 ([𝛼𝑃 ).
̅
Α 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

Definition 3.6 The unionof two IV-Q-NSMs denoted by [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ∪ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] where
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = [⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩] ,[𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] =
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐵 ]⟩] and[𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =
B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩] for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑟, 𝑗 = 1,2, … , 𝑠. Then,
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛

249

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025

(𝑚𝑎𝑥 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ ] , 𝑚𝑎𝑥 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢

̅
, 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
])
Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

[𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] = (𝑚𝑖𝑛 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ ] , 𝑚𝑖𝑛 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ])

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

(𝑚𝑖𝑛 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ ] , 𝑚𝑖𝑛 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ])

{ Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

Definition 3.7 The intersectionof two IV-Q-NSMs denoted by [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ∩ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] where
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = [⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩] ,[𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] =
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐵 ]⟩] and[𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =
B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐶 ]⟩] for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑟, 𝑗 = 1,2, … , 𝑠. Then,
C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 C𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛

(𝑚𝑖𝑛 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ ] , 𝑚𝑎𝑥 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢

̅
, 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
])
Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

𝑖,𝑙 𝑖,𝑙 𝑖,𝑢 𝑖,𝑢

[𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] = (𝑚𝑎𝑥 [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] , 𝑚𝑖𝑛 [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ])
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗

(𝑚𝑎𝑥 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ ] , 𝑚𝑖𝑛 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ])

{ Α 𝑖,𝑗 B 𝑖,𝑗 Α 𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

𝒄
Definition 3.8 The complement of two IV-Q-NSMs denoted by [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] where
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝒄 𝑐 𝑐 𝑐
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = [⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ] ⟩] ,[𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] =for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑟, 𝑗 =
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
1,2, … , 𝑠. Then,

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙
([𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ])
Α𝑖,𝑗 A𝑖,𝑗
𝒄
𝑖,𝑢 𝑖,𝑙
[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = ([1 − 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ , 1 − 𝑃̂𝔔A̅ ])
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑙
([𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ])
{ Α 𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗

Definition 3.9 Let [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] and [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] be two IV-Q-NSMs, where [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] =
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩] and[𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] =
Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐵 ]⟩] for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑟, 𝑗 = 1,2, … , 𝑠. Then the OR-operation
B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
(⋁) of IV-Q-NSMs denoted by [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ⨂ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] and defined as following form:
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ⋁ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] such that

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] = [⟨max 𝑚𝑖𝑛 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , min 𝑚𝑎𝑥 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , min 𝑚𝑎𝑥 [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛

250

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025

Definition 3.10 Let [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] and [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] be two IV-Q-NSMs, where [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] =
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩] and[𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] =
Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
𝑚×𝑛
𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝐵 ]⟩] for all 𝑖 = 1,2, … , 𝑟, 𝑗 = 1,2, … , 𝑠. Then the AND-operation
B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 B𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛

(∧) of IV-Q-NSMs denoted by [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ⊚ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] and defined as following form:

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ∧ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] such that

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] = [⟨min 𝑚𝑎𝑥 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , max 𝑚𝑖𝑛 [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , max 𝑚𝑖𝑛 [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛

Example 3.11. Take two IV-Q-NSSs:

〈[0.2,0.8],[0.1,0.7],[0.4,0.8]〉 〈[0.1,0.4],[0.5,0.8],[0.7,0.8]〉
𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ = {(𝔢1 , (v1 ,𝓆1 )
, (v1 ,𝓆2 )
)} and
𝑖,𝑗

〈[0.3,0.6],[0.2,0.7],[0.5,0.8]〉 〈[0.4,0.6],[0.2,0.9],[0.5,0.7]〉
𝑃̂𝔔B̅ = {(𝔢1 , (v1 ,𝓆1 )
, (v1 ,𝓆2 )
)} Then:both[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] and [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] it is presented
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

as follows:

[0.2,0.8], [0.1,0.7], [0.4,0.8] [0.3,0.6], [0.2,0.7], [0.5,0.8]

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] =[ ] ,[𝑃̂ ] =[ ]
𝑖,𝑗 2×1 [0.1,0.4], [0.5,0.8], [0.7,0.8] 2×1 𝔔B̅𝑖,𝑗 2×1 [0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.9], [0.5,0.7] 2×1

Then:

[0.3,0.9], [0.4,0.9], [0.5,0.9]

1. [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] + [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =[ ]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 [0.4,0.5], [0.7,0.6], [0.8,0.9] 2×1
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛
[0.2,0.8], [0.1,0.7], [0.4,0.8]
2. [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] − [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =[ ]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 [0.1,0.4], [0.5,0.8], [0.7,0.8] 2×1
[0.2,0.8], [0.1,0.7], [0.4,0.8]
3. [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] × [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =[ ]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 [0.1,0.4], [0.5,0.8], [0.7,0.8] 2×1
[0.3,0.8], [0.1,0.7], [0.4,0.8]
4. [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ∪ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =[ ]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 [0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.8], [0.5,0.7] 2×1
[0.2,0.6], [0.2,0.7], [0.5,0.8]
5. [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ∩ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] = [𝑃̂𝔔C̅ ] =[ ]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 [0.1,0.4], [0.5,0.9], [0.7,0.8] 2×1
𝑐
[0.4,0.8], [0.3,0.9], [0.2,0.8]
6. [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] =[ ]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 [0.7,0.8], [0.2,0.5], [0.1,0.4] 2×1
[0.3,0.8], [0.1,0.7], [0.4,0.8]
7. [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ⋁ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] =[ ]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 [0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.8], [0.5,0.7] 2×1
[0.2,0.6], [0.2,0.7], [0.5,0.8]
8. [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] ∧ [𝑃̂𝔔B̅ ] =[ ]
𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 [0.1,0.4], [0.5,0.9], [0.7,0.8] 2×1

4. Practical application of IV-Q-NSM in Medical Field

In this section, we will show the apparatus for appealing to our put-forward model in dealing with daily life
situations. By narrating an issue in the medical field and showing the mechanism for representing its data proposed
by our proposed model. After that, we will work on creating an algorithm consisting of a number of sequential
steps that analyze the algebraic structure of our proposed model and the data it represents. Now we will provide
some definitions that will be useful to us in building the above algorithm.

251

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025

Definition 4.1. Let [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] be IV-Q-NSMs, where [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] =

𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛 𝑖,𝑗 𝑚×𝑛

𝑓,𝑙 𝑓,𝑢
[⟨[𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
] , [𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ ] , [𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ , 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ]⟩] then IV-Q-NSMs reduce to IV-Q-FSMs ΨΑ̅𝑖,𝑗 where the
Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗
𝑚×𝑛
1 𝑓,𝑙 1
lower and upper given as following formalhs ΨΑ̅𝑙 𝑖,𝑗 = (𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑙̅ + 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑙̅ + 𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ), ΨΑ̅𝑢𝑖,𝑗 = (𝑃̂𝔔𝑡,𝑢
̅
+ 𝑃̂𝔔𝑖,𝑢̅ +
3 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗 3 Α𝑖,𝑗 Α𝑖,𝑗

𝑓,𝑢
𝑃̂𝔔 ̅ ).
Α𝑖,𝑗

Definition 4.2. (Comparison Matrix) Comparison matrix is define as a matrix that provides a comprehensive
comparison between the membership function values of each object with other objects according to a rule that
gives a value of 1 if it is larger and a value of 0 if the value is smaller.

Algorithm
Step 1. Build the IV-Q-NSM based on the IV-Q-NSS.
Step 2. Convert IV-Q-NSM to IV-Q-FSM using definition.
𝑙,𝑡 𝑢,𝑡
ΨΑ
̅ +ΨΑ
̅
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
Step 3. Convert IV-Q-FSM to SV-Q-FSM using the following formal ΨΑ̅𝑖,𝑗 =
2

Step 4. Find comparison matrix based on given definition above.

Step 5. Find the score values 𝑀𝑡 for all (𝑣, 𝑞) ∈ 𝑉 × 𝑄, where 𝑡 = 1,2, … 𝑛.
Step 6. The decision taken is to pick the highest score of 𝑀𝑡 ,i.e. Decision taken= 𝑚𝑎𝑥{𝑀𝑡 }.
Step 7. End Algorithm.

Case Study

Now, we provide a case study related to the medical field for IV-Q-NSS strategic decision-making method.
On a cold winter day, numerous patients visited the office of a respiratory doctor to diagnose their health conditions
(whether COVID-positive or not) based on the symptoms they were experiencing. To assist the doctor in
organizing and analyzing patient data according to our proposed model, we requested that he select a value between
0 and 1 that reflects the severity of symptoms and their association with the disease (COVID). In this context, a
ratio closer to 1 indicates more severe symptoms and a greater impact on the disease. Therefore:

Suppose that 𝑉 = {𝑣1 , 𝑣2 , 𝑣3 , 𝑣4 } be a patient set contains four patients, 𝔔 = {𝔮1 , 𝔮2 } where 𝔮1 =infected and
𝔮2 =uninfected,while 𝐴̅ ⊆ ℰ = {e1 , 𝑒̅2 , 𝑒̅3 } be a set of symptoms contains four symptoms such that 𝑎̅1 =Headache,
𝑎̅2 =Sore throat, 𝑎̅3 =Muscle pain

Now, after the doctor has examined each patient and set a numerical value between 0 and 1 for each of the
symptoms above, our proposed model can be built in a way that is consistent with the examining doctor’s report.
The examining physician's opinion will be analyzed and help him make the appropriate decision about which of
the examined patients are infected or not .

𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ =

〈[0.2,0.8], [0.1,0.7], [0.4,0.8]〉 〈[0.1,0.4], [0.5,0.8], [0.7,0.8]〉

{(𝑒̅1 , ,
(v1 , 𝔮1 ) (v1 , 𝔮2 )

〈[0.3,0.6], [0.2,0.7], [0.5,0.8]〉 〈[0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.9], [0.5,0.7]〉

,
(v2 , 𝔮1 ) (v2 , 𝔮2 )

〈[0.6,0.8], [0.4,0.5], [0.3,0.5]〉 〈[0.3,0.7], [0.2,0.4], [0.1,0.8]〉

,
(v3 , 𝔮1 ) (v3 , 𝔮2 )

252

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025

〈[0.1,0.5], [0.3,0.7], [0.2,0.8]〉 〈[0.4,0.8], [0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.8]〉

, )
(v4 , 𝔮1 ) (v4 , 𝔮2 )

〈[0.1,0.8], [0.5,0.7], [0.3,0.4]〉 〈[0.1,0.8], [0.4,0.7], [0.2,0.6]〉

(𝔢2 , ,
(v1 , 𝔮1 ) (v1 , 𝔮2 )

〈[0.5,0.8], [0.4,0.9], [0.2,0.7]〉 〈[0.1,0.2], [0.2,0.5], [0.4,0.7]〉

,
(v2 , 𝔮1 ) (v2 , 𝔮2 )

〈[0.6,0.8], [0.4,0.5], [0.3,0.5]〉 〈[0.3,0.7], [0.2,0.4], [0.1,0.8]〉

,
(v3 , 𝔮1 ) (v3 , 𝔮2 )

〈[0.1,0.4], [0.2,0.5], [0.3,0.7]〉 〈[0.1,0.6], [0.4,0.5], [0.5,0.7]〉

, )
(v4 , 𝔮1 ) (v4 , 𝔮2 )

〈[0.7,0.9], [0.2,0.8], [0.3,0.6]〉 〈[0.4,0.7], [0.2,0.5], [0.1,0.7]〉

(𝔢3 , ,
(v1 , 𝔮1 ) (v1 , 𝔮2 )

〈[0.1,0.8], [0.1,0.4], [0.3,0.6]〉 〈[0.5,0.6], [0.3,0.6], [0.2,0.7]〉

,
(v2 , 𝔮1 ) (v2 , 𝔮2 )

〈[0.6,0.8], [0.4,0.5], [0.3,0.5]〉 〈[0.3,0.7], [0.2,0.4], [0.1,0.8]〉

,
(v3 , 𝔮1 ) (v3 , 𝔮2 )

〈[0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.7], [0.3,0.6]〉 〈[0.4,0.8], [0.8,0.9], [0.3,0.7]〉

, )}
(v4 , 𝔮1 ) (v4 , 𝔮2 )

To approximate the working mechanism, we take the part

〈[0.2,0.8],[0.1,0.7],[0.4,0.8]〉
(𝑒1 , (v1 ,𝔮1 )
) Here, this part indicates that the strength of the symptom 𝑎̅1 of the first patient
suspected of having the disease is strongly estimated between [0.2,0.8], the degree of non-injury rating [0.4,0.8]
and the degree of neutrality in whether or not an injury is present is estimated [0.1,0.7].

Now we use the above algorithm to solve this problem by applying its steps sequentially and clearly.

Step 1. Build the IV-Q-NSM [𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] based on the IV-Q-NSS 𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ .

𝑚×𝑛

[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ]
3×8

∖ 𝑒1 𝑒2 𝑒3
(v1 , 𝔮1 ) 〈[0.2,0.8], [0.1,0.7], [0.4,0.8]〉 〈[0.1,0.8], [0.5,0.7], [0.3,0.4]〉 〈[0.7,0.9], [0.2,0.8], [0.3,0.6]〉
(v1 , 𝔮2 ) [0.1,0.4], [0.5,0.8], [0.7,0.8] 〈[0.1,0.8], [0.4,0.7], [0.2,0.6]〉 〈[0.4,0.7], [0.2,0.5], [0.1,0.7]〉
(v2 , 𝔮1 ) 〈[0.3,0.6], [0.2,0.7], [0.5,0.8]〉 〈[0.5,0.8], [0.4,0.9], [0.2,0.7]〉 〈[0.1,0.8], [0.1,0.4], [0.3,0.6]〉
= (v2 , 𝔮2 ) 〈[0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.9], [0.5,0.7]〉 〈[0.1,0.2], [0.2,0.5], [0.4,0.7]〉 〈[0.5,0.6], [0.3,0.6], [0.2,0.7]〉
(v3 , 𝔮1 ) 〈[0.6,0.8], [0.4,0.5], [0.3,0.5]〉 〈[0.6,0.8], [0.4,0.5], [0.3,0.5]〉 〈[0.6,0.8], [0.4,0.5], [0.3,0.5]〉
(v3 , 𝔮2 ) 〈[0.3,0.7], [0.2,0.4], [0.1,0.8]〉 〈[0.3,0.7], [0.2,0.4], [0.1,0.8]〉 〈[0.3,0.7], [0.2,0.4], [0.1,0.8]〉
(v4 , 𝔮1 ) 〈[0.1,0.5], [0.3,0.7], [0.2,0.8]〉 〈[0.1,0.4], [0.2,0.5], [0.3,0.7]〉 〈[0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.7], [0.3,0.6]〉
[(v4 , 𝔮2 ) 〈[0.4,0.8], [0.4,0.6], [0.2,0.8]〉 〈[0.1,0.6], [0.4,0.5], [0.5,0.7]〉 〈[0.4,0.8], [0.8,0.9], [0.3,0.7]〉]
3×8

Step 2. Convert IV-Q-NSM to IV-Q-FSM using definition.

253

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025

∖ 𝑒1 𝑒2 𝑒3
(v1 , 𝔮1 ) 〈[0.21,0.69]〉 〈[0.54,0.76]〉 〈[0.43,0.65]〉
(v1 , 𝔮2 ) 〈[0.43,0.64]〉 〈[0.24,0.79]〉 〈[0.24,0.74]〉
(v2 , 𝔮1 ) 〈[0.21,0.78]〉 〈[0.57,0.86]〉 〈[0.35,0.76]〉
[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = (v2 , 𝔮2 ) 〈[0.34,0.89]〉 〈[0.34,0.78]〉 〈[0.25,0.68]〉
3×8
(v3 , 𝔮1 ) 〈[0.56,0.80]〉 〈[0.53,0.86]〉 〈[0.45,0.79]〉
(v3 , 𝔮2 ) 〈[0.46,0.84]〉 〈[0.32,0.69]〉 〈[0.24,0.78]〉
(v4 , 𝔮1 ) 〈[0.58,0.94]〉 〈[048,0.72]〉 〈[0.21,0.74]〉
[(v4 , 𝔮2 ) 〈[0.36,0.78]〉 〈[0.43,0.79]〉 〈[0.68,0.91]〉]
3×8

𝑙,𝑡 𝑢,𝑡
ΨΑ
̅ +ΨΑ
̅
𝑖,𝑗 𝑖,𝑗
Step 3. Convert IV-Q-FSM to SV-Q-FSM using the following formal ΨΑ̅𝑖,𝑗 =
2

∖ 𝑒1 𝑒2 𝑒3
(v1 , 𝔮1 ) 〈0.45〉 〈0.65〉 〈0.54〉
(v1 , 𝔮2 ) 〈0.53〉 〈0.52〉 〈0.49〉
(v2 , 𝔮1 ) 〈0.50〉 〈0.72〉 〈0.60〉
[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = (v2 , 𝔮2 ) 〈0.61〉 〈0.56〉 〈0.47〉
3×8
(v3 , 𝔮1 ) 〈0.68〉 〈0.70〉 〈0.62〉
(v3 , 𝔮2 ) 〈0.65〉 〈0.51〉 〈0.51〉
(v4 , 𝔮1 ) 〈0.76〉 〈0.6〉 〈0.48〉
[ 4 , 𝔮2 )
(v 〈0.57〉 〈0.61〉 〈0.80〉]
3×8

Step 4. Find comparison matrix based on given definition above.

∖
𝑒1 𝑒2 𝑒3
(v1 , 𝔮1 )
1 5 4
(v1 , 𝔮2 ) 2 1 2
(v2 , 𝔮1 ) 1 7 5
[𝑃̂𝔔Α̅ ] = (v2 , 𝔮2 ) 4 2 0
3×8
(v3 , 𝔮1 ) 6 6 6
(v3 , 𝔮2 ) 5 0 2
7 3 1
(v4 , 𝔮1 )
3 4 7
[(v4 , 𝔮2 ) ]3×8

Step 5. Find the score values 𝑀𝑡 for all (𝑣, 𝑞) ∈ 𝑉 × 𝑄, where 𝑡 = 1,2, … 𝑛.

(vi , 𝔮j ) 𝑀i
(v1 , 𝔮1 ) 𝑀1 = 10
(v1 , 𝔮2 ) 𝑀2 = 5
(v2 , 𝔮1 ) 𝑀3 = 13
(v2 , 𝔮2 ) 𝑀4 = 6
(v3 , 𝔮1 ) 𝑀5 = 18
(v3 , 𝔮2 ) 𝑀6 = 7
(v4 , 𝔮1 ) 𝑀7 = 11
[(v4 , 𝔮2 ) 𝑀8 = 14]

Step 6. The decision taken is to pick the highest score of 𝑀𝑡 ,i.e. Decision taken= 𝑚𝑎𝑥{𝑀𝑡 }. Here the Decision
taken showing in the following table:

254

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025
Table 1: Comparison of the results obtained from the above algorithm

Patients Degree of (𝒗, 𝖖𝟏 ) Degree of (𝒗, 𝖖𝟐 ) Comparison Result

𝐯𝟏 10 5 𝖖𝟏 > 𝖖𝟐 Yes

𝐯𝟐 13 6 𝖖𝟏 > 𝖖𝟐 Yes

𝐯𝟑 18 7 𝖖𝟏 > 𝖖𝟐 Yes

𝐯𝟒 11 14 𝖖𝟏 < 𝖖𝟐 No

By looking at Table 1. above, which contains a comparison between the results obtained, it is clear that all patients
𝐯𝟏 , 𝐯𝟐 , 𝐯𝟑 are infected except the patient 𝐯𝟒 .
Based on the results obtained from Algorithm 1, we can construct the following statistical chart, which illustrates
the variation in the severity of symptoms among the patients examined in the doctor’s clinic.

20 18
18
16 14
14 13
12 11
10
10
8 7
6
6 5
4
2
0
1 2 3 4
(v_i,q1) 10 13 18 11
(v_i,q2) 5 6 7 14

Figure 1. Statistical chart, which shows the disparity in the severity of the injury among those examined in the
doctor’s clinic.

5. Conclusion

In this work, a new framework was presented for a previous concept, where the concept of IV-Q-NSS was
presented in a matrix system. In this work, first, the concept of IV-Q-NSM was presented, then the properties of
this concept were clarified and shown. Based on this concept, some theories were given that show the mechanism
of the presented tools. In addition, work was done to show the importance of this concept in solving daily life
problems by creating a multi-step algorithm that helps in solving one of the decision-making problems, specifically
in the medical field. Finally, as recommendations for future studies, these tools can be developed by integrating
them with mathematical tools explained in the following works see [37-45].

Reference
[1] Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information Control, 8(3): 338-353.
[2] Alhazaymeh, K., Al-Qudah, Y., Hassan, N., & Nasruddin, A. M. (2020). Cubic vague set and its
application in decision making. Entropy, 22(9), 963.
[3] Hassan, N., & Al-Qudah, Y. (2019, April). Fuzzy parameterized complex multi-fuzzy soft set.
In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1212, p. 012016). IOP Publishing.
255

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025
[4] Zail, S. H., Abed, M. M., & Faisal, A. S. (2022). Neutrosophic BCK-algebra and Ω-BCK-algebra.
International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 19(3), 8-15.
[5] A. Al-Quran, F. Al-Sharqi, A. U. Rahman and Z. M. Rodzi, The q-rung orthopair fuzzy-valued
neutrosophic sets: Axiomatic properties, aggregation operators and applications. AIMS Mathematics,
9(2), 5038-5070, 2024.
[6] Smarandache, F. A Unifying Field in Logics. Neutrosophy: Neutrosophic Probability, Set and Lgics,
American Research Press, Reoboth, NM, USA, 1998.
[7] Deli, I. (2017). Interval-valued neutrosophic soft sets and its decision making. International Journal of
Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 8, 665-676.
[8] F. Al-Sharqi, A. Al-Quran and Z. M. Rodzi, Multi-Attribute Group Decision-Making Based on
Aggregation Operator and Score Function of Bipolar Neutrosophic Hypersoft Environment,
Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 61(1), 465-492, 2023.
[9] Abed, M. M., Hassan, N., & Al-Sharqi, F. (2022). On neutrosophic multiplication module. Neutrosophic
Sets and Systems, 49(1), 198-208.
[10] M U Romdhini, F Al-Sharqi, A Nawawi, A Al-Quran, and H Rashmanlou. Signless Laplacian energy
of interval-valued fuzzy graph and its applications. Sains Malaysiana, 52(7):2127–2137, 2023.
[11] Al-Quran, A., Al-Sharqi, F., Rodzi, Z. M., Aladil, M., Romdhini, M. U., Tahat, M. K., & Solaiman, O.
S. (2023). The Algebraic Structures of Q-Complex Neutrosophic Soft Sets Associated with Groups and
Subgroups. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 22(1), 60-77.
[12] Jamiatun Nadwa Ismail et al. The Integrated Novel Framework: Linguistic Variables in Pythagorean
Neutrosophic Set with DEMATEL for Enhanced Decision Support. Int. J. Neutrosophic Sci., vol. 21,
no. 2, pp. 129-141, 2023.
[13] M U Romdhini, A Al-Quran, F Al-Sharqi, M K Tahat, and A Lutfi. Exploring the Algebraic Structures
of Q-Complex Neutrosophic Soft Fields. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 22(04):93–105,
2023.
[14] Al-Sharqi, F., Ahmad, A. G., & Al-Quran, A. (2022). Interval complex neutrosophic soft relations and
their application in decision-making. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 43(1), 745-771.
[15] Abed, M. M., Al-Jumaili, A. F., Al-sharqi, F. G. Some mathematical structures in a topological group.
Journal of Algebra and Applied Mathematics. 2018, 16(2), 99-117.
[16] F. Al-Sharqi, A.G. Ahmad, A. Al-Quran, Interval-valued neutrosophic soft expert set from real space
to complex space, Computer Modeling in Engineering and Sciences, vol. 132(1), pp. 267–293, 2022.
[17] Abed, M. M.; Al-Sharqi, F.; Zail, S. H. A Certain Conditions on Some Rings Give P.P. Ring. Journal of
Physics: Conference Series, 2021, 1818(1), 012068.
[18] F. Al-Sharqi, A. Ahmad, A. Al-Quran, Fuzzy parameterized-interval complex neutrosophic soft sets and
their applications under uncertainty, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 44, (2023), 1453–1477.
[19] Rodzi, Z. M et al. A DEMATEL Analysis of The Complex Barriers Hindering Digitalization
Technology Adoption In The Malaysia Agriculture Sector. Journal of Intelligent Systems and Internet
of Things, 13(1), 21-30, 2024.
[20] Ali, T. M., & Mohammed, F. M. (2022). Some Perfectly Continuous Functions via Fuzzy Neutrosophic
Topological Spaces. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, 18(4), 174-183.
[21] Khalaf, Z. A., & Mohammed, F. M. (2023). An Introduction to M-Open Sets in Fuzzy Neutrosophic
Topological Spaces. International Journal of Neutrosophic Science, (4), 36-45.
[22] Palanikumar, M., Hezam, I. M., Jana, C., Pal, M., & Weber, G. W. (2024). Multiple-attribute decision-
making for selection of medical robotic engineering based on logarithmic square root neutrosophic
normal approach. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, 20(7), 2405-2433.
[23] Palanikumar, M., Jana, C., Hezam, I. M., Foul, A., Simic, V., & Pamucar, D. (2024). Multiple attribute
decision-making model for artificially intelligent last-mile delivery robots selection in neutrosophic
square root environment. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 136, 108878.
[24] Al-Qudah, Y., & Ganie, A. H. (2023). Bidirectional approximate reasoning and pattern analysis based
on a novel Fermatean fuzzy similarity metric. Granular Computing, 8(6), 1767-1782.
[25] Al-Qudah, Y., & Al-Sharqi, F. (2023). Algorithm for decision-making based on similarity measures of
possibility interval-valued neutrosophic soft setting settings. International Journal of Neutrosophic
Science, 22(3), 69-83.
[26] Alahmadi, R. A., Ganie, A. H., Al-Qudah, Y., Khalaf, M. M., & Ganie, A. H. (2023). Multi-attribute
decision-making based on novel Fermatean fuzzy similarity measure and entropy measure. Granular
Computing, 8(6), 1385-1405.
[27] Al-Sharqi, F., Al-Qudah, Y., & Alotaibi, N. (2023). Decision-making techniques based on similarity
measures of possibility neutrosophic soft expert sets. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 55(1), 358 – 382.

256

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024
 International Journal of Neutrosophic Science (IJNS) Vol. 25, No. 03, PP. 242-257, 2025
[28] Al-Hchaimi, A. A. J., Sulaiman, N. B., Mustafa, M. A. B., Mohtar, M. N. B., Hassan, S. L. B. M., &
Muhsen, Y. R. (2022). Evaluation approach for efficient countermeasure techniques against denial-of-
service attack on MPSoC-based IoT using multi-criteria decision-making. IEEE Access, 11, 89-106.
[29] Abed, M. M. (2022). On Indeterminacy (Neutrosophic) of Hollow Modules. Iraqi Journal of Science,
2650-2655.
[30] Rahman, A. U., Saeed, M., Mohammed, M. A., Abdulkareem, K. H., Nedoma, J., & Martinek, R.
(2023). An innovative mathematical approach to the evaluation of susceptibility in liver disorder based
on fuzzy parameterized complex fuzzy hypersoft set. Biomedical signal processing and control, 86, 105-
204.
[31] M. Arshad et al. (2024). A robust framework for the selection of optimal COVID-19 mask based on
aggregations of interval-valued multi-fuzzy hypersoft sets. Expert systems with applications, 238,
121944.
[32] Al-Qudah, Y., Jaradat, A., Sharma, S. K., & Bhat, V. K. (2024). Mathematical analysis of the structure
of one-heptagonal carbon nanocone in terms of its basis and dimension. Physica Scripta, 99(5), 055252.
[33] Abed, M. M., & Al-Sharqi, F. G. (2018, May). Classical Artinian module and related topics. In Journal
of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1003, No. 1, p. 012065). IOP Publishing.
[34] Ghazi, E., & Al-Salihi, S. O. (2024). A robust framework for medical diagnostics based on interval
valued Q-neutrosophic soft sets with aggregation operators. Neutrosophic Sets and Systems, 68, 165-
186.
[35] F. Al-Sharqi, M. U. Romdhini, A. Al-Quran, Group decision-making based on aggregation operator and
score function of Q-neutrosophic soft matrix, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, vol. 45, pp.305–
321, 2023.
[36] Auad , A. A., & Al-Sharqi, F. (2023). Identical Theorem of Approximation Unbounded Functions by
Linear Operators. Journal of Applied Mathematics & Informatics, 41(4), 801–810.
[37] Abu Qamar, M., Hassan, N. (2018). Generalized Q-neutrosophic soft expert set for decision under
uncertainty. Symmetry, 10(11), 621.
[38] F. Al-Sharqi, A. Al-Quran, M. U. Romdhini, Decision-making techniques based on similarity measures
of possibility interval fuzzy soft environment, Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, vol.
4, pp.18--29, 2023.
[39] Al-Qudah, Y., Alaroud, M., Qoqazeh, H., Jaradat, A., Alhazmi, S. E., & Al-Omari, S. (2022).
Approximate analytic–numeric fuzzy solutions of fuzzy fractional equations using a residual power
series approach. Symmetry, 14(4), 804.
[40] Hamadameen, A. O., & Hassan, N. (2018). A compromise solution for the fully fuzzy multiobjective
linear programming problems. Ieee Access, 6, 43696-43711.
[41] Hamadameen, A. O., & Zainuddin, Z. M. (2014, June). Multiobjective fuzzy stochastic linear
programming problems with inexact probability distribution. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol.
1602, No. 1, pp. 546-558). American Institute of Physics.
[42] A. Bataihah, T. Qawasmeh, and M. Shatnawi. ”Discussion on b-metric spaces and related results in
metric and G-metric spaces.” Nonlinear Functional Analysis and Applications 27, no. 2 (2022): 233-
247.
[43] A. Bataihah. Some fixed point results with application to fractional differential equation via new type of
distance spaces. Results in Nonlinear Analysis 2024, 7, 202–208.
[44] Ismail, J. N., Rodzi, Z., Hashim, H., Sulaiman, N. H., Al-Sharqi, F., Al-Quran, A., & Ahmad, A. G.
Enhancing Decision Accuracy in DEMATEL using Bonferroni Mean Aggregation under Pythagorean
Neutrosophic Environment. Journal of Fuzzy Extension & Applications (JFEA), 4(4), 281 - 298, 2023.
[45] Abed, M. M. (2022). On Indeterminacy (Neutrosophic) of Hollow Modules. Iraqi Journal of Science,
2650-2655.

257

DOI: https://doi.org/10.54216/IJNS.250322
Received: March 04, 2024 Revised: May 29, 2024 Accepted: October 15, 2024

View publication stats