Part 1, Formation Evaluation Using Routine Core Analyses, One Day
Part 1, Formation Evaluation Using Routine Core Analyses, One Day
Part--I
Part
١
٢
Sampling & Coring Process
٥
Coring Analysis
* Routine core analysis (rcal).
(
Porosity, permeability, saturation, lithology, grain density.
٦
Rock Phases
Fluid Pore
Migration Phase
Path
Grain
Phase
٧
Grain, Pore and Fluid phases
Rock Porosity
Matrix
Volume of
Hydrocarbons
VRM=1-∅T Volume
of Water
VH2O= SW* ∅T
٨
Hydrocarbons Cleaning &
Soxhlet Apparatus
٩
Routine Core Analyses
١٠
Porosity
Classification of Porosity “According to the time of deposition”:
١١
Basic Porosity Types
o Fabric Selective:
n Interparticle: void space between particles
n Intraparticle: void space inside particles
n Intercrystal: void space between crystals
n Moldic: porosity due to selective removal of a former fossil/grain
n Fenestral: ‘bird’s-eye’
eye’ pores usually associated with algal mats
n Shelter: sheltering effect of large particles prevent infilling the pores by finer particles
n Growth-framework: due to the inplace growth of a carbonate rock framework
0
o Not Fabric Selective:
n Fracture: due to tectonic shocks and different pressures
n Channel: dissolution enlarged fracture, due to dissolution
n Vug: irregular-shaped
shaped pores, due to dissolution
n Cavern: irregular-shaped human-size
size caves, due to dissolution
o Fabric or Not Fabric Selective:
n Breccia: due to brecciation
n Boring: making or enlarging a hole as a cylindrical hole by boring or digging away
n Burrow: irregular vugs surrounding casts of burrows or roots
n Shrinkage: An irregular pore formed in muddy sediment by shrinkage.
١٢
Effect of various factors enhancing or reducing the
effective porosity.
١٣
Porosity Controls
Dissolution and leaching out
١٤
Porosity Controls
Fracturing
Diagenetic History
١٥
Porosity Controls
Cementation
١٦
Porosity Controls
Cementation
١٧
Porosity Controls
Swelling Clay distribution
١٨
Porosity Controls
Sorting and Packing
١٩
Pore-Space
Space Classification
o Classification of Porosity:
o 1. Total Porosity
n is the ratio of the total pore volume to bulk volume regardless the
continuity of the pores.
o 2. Effective Porosity
n is the ratio of interconnected pore volume to the bulk volume.
٢٠
Pore-Space
Space Classification
Vb = Vp + Vg
٢١
Porosity
٢٢
Total and Effective Porosity
٢٣
Porosity
1. Bulk Volume
In all porosity methods a bulk core sample volume
has to be determined and this may be carried out by:
n Displacement of liquid (Archimedes mercury immersion
apparatus).
Vb = (Saturated Wt – Immersed Wt) / density of immersed fluid
٢٥
Porosity
From gas source
Reference
chamber
Vr Pressure
transducer
sample
sample
chamber
Vg
Vc
Boyle's law porosimeter
Helium Pycnometer ٢٦
Porosity
3. Pore Volume
n Simply, the pore volume is calculated by subtracting the Grain
Volume “Vg” from the Bulk Volume “Vb”.
n Vp = Vb – Vg
There are other ways to measure the pore volume which can be
summarized as follows:
o 3.1. Summation of fluids
n This method involves the independent determination of oil, gas
and pure water volumes of a fresh core sample.
n The oil (650°) and water(160°)) can be obtained by retort.
n The gas can be obtained by mercury injection (700 psi).
n The pore volume is determined by summing the three
independent volumes.
٢٧
Porosity
Oven retort
Oven retort
٢٨
Porosity
o 3.2. Liquid resaturation
n The pores of a prepared sample are filled with a liquid of a
known density.
n The increase in weight of the sample divided by the fluid
density is a measure of the pore volume.
٢٩
٣٠
Permeability
1.. Single Phase System (absolute permeability)
“It is the ability of the porous media to transmit a single fluid through its
interconnected pores”.
2. Multi phase system
2.1 Effective permeability
“it is the conductivity of each phase at a specific saturation”; when a
second or third phase is present, the obtained permeability of each phase at
a specific saturation is called effective permeability, hence, depends upon
the fluid ratio and its distribution within the pore spaces. Fluid distribution
in turn depends upon the saturation history and wettability of the rock.
2.2 Relative permeability
“it is the ability of the rock to transmit a fluid when there are two or three
phases within the pore spaces”
effective Permeabili ty
Relative Permeability =
specific Permeabili ty ٣١
Permeability
SINGLE PHASE SYSTEM (Absolute Permeability)
DEFINATION
“It is the ability of the porous media to transmit a single fluid through its
interconnected pores”.
- The rate of flow of a liquid through a formation depends on:
The pressure drop.
The viscosity of the fluid.
The permeability.
- The pressure drop is a reservoir property.
- The viscosity is a fluid property.
- The permeability is a measure of the ease at which a fluid can flow through a
formation.
- Relationships exist between permeability and porosity for given formations, although
they are not universal.
- A rock must have porosity to have a permeability.
permeability
- The unit of measurement is the Darcy.
www.projacstraining.com
- Reservoir permeability is usually quoted in٣٢millidarcies, (md = 0.9869 x 10-3 µm2)
Is there another method to measure the permeability?
Absolute permeability
Relative permeability
٣٣
Darcy’s Law
Darcy experimented and developed an empirical relationship for the flow
of fluid through a packed sand , known as Darcy’s low:
k = permeability, millidarcies Ak ( ∆ p )
q =
q = flow rate, cm3/sec
µL
µ = fluid viscosity, cp
L = system length, cm A
q q
A = system cross sectional area, cm2
µ
p2 p1
∆p = differential pressure (p1-p2), atm.
L
One darcy is defined as:
“the ability of the porous rock to transmit fluid of one centipoise viscosity (µ) at
a rate (q) of 1 cm3/s through a cross sectional area (A) of 1cm2 when the
pressure gradient (∆P / L) is 1 atm/cm” ٣٤
Gas Permeameter
∅ 4.4
* Timur Equation (1968): K = 0.136 *
( Swirr ) 2
2
∅ 3
* For medium gravity oil: K = 250 ∗ Wyllie and Rose (1950)
Swirr
2
∅3
* For Dry Gas: K = 79 ∗
Wyllie and Rose (1950)
S wirr
٣٧
Porosity-Permeability
Permeability Relationships
* For medium gravity oil:
٣٨
Porosity and Permeability Scales
* Porosity Scale
Negligible : 0 < ∅ ≤ 5 %,
Poor : 5 < ∅ ≤ 10 %,
Fair : 10 < ∅ ≤ 15 %,
Good : 15 < ∅ ≤ 20%; and
Very good : 20 < ∅ ≤ 25%. (Levorsen, 1967)
Excellent : 25 % < ∅ (New Rank, Nabawy et al., 2009)
* Permeability Scale
Fair :1 <K ≤ 10 md.;
Good : 10 < K ≤ 100 md.;
.; and
Very good : 100 < K ≤ 1000 md. (Levorsen, 1967)
Excellent : 1000 < K (New Rank, Nabawy et al., 2009)
٣٩
Effect of various factors enhancing or reducing the
permeability.
Significant Permeability
Reduction
Migration of Fines
Problem
Carter Sandstone
North Blowhorn Creek Oil Unit
Black Warrior Basin, Alabama, USA (Photograph by R.L. Kugler) ٤١
٤٢
٤٣
٤٤
Porosity-permeability
permeability cross plot
٤٥
F Sab'atayn basin is one of the two main hydrocarbon fields in
Yemen.
F The present study is a trial to use the measured conventional
core analysis data to define the potential reservoir zones in Alif
and Seen members and to discriminate them into conductive and
superconductive zones, and into potential and impervious zones
using the concept of Reservoir Quality index ‘RQI’, the Flow zone
Index ‘FZI’ and the Reservoir Potentiality Index ‘RPI’.
F The studied Alif and Seen samples are composed mostly of
pebbly quartz arenite, sometimes of dolomitic and ferruginous
quartz arenite.
F Based on the petrophysical behaviour, the studied Alif member is
subdivided into three petrophysical facies in Alif 003 well and
into two facies in Alif 005 well. Seen member is also subdivided
into two petrophysical facies in Alif 005 well.
Alif Oil Field
Location map of the study area and the oil promising sedimentary basins of Yemen
Lithostratigraphic correlation between the studied Alif and Seen members in wells
Alif 003 and Alif 005,, Sab’atayn Formation, Sab’atayn Formation, Yemen
F The reservoir quality index (RQI) is defined as “the square
root of the ratio between permeability and porosity”. This
term can be used to quantify the flow character of the
reservoir (Amaefule et al., 1993).
1993
RQI + FZI
RPI =
2
٥٢
RESERVOIR ZONATION
10 % < Porosity
1 md < Permeability
5 ft < Continuity
5 ft < Continuity
4 ≤ (RPI)
Vertical matching of bulk density, porosity, permeability, ‘RQI’, ‘FZI’ and reservoir
potentiality ‘RPI’ versus depth for the Alif member, Sab'atayn Formation, Alif 003
well, Sab'atayn basin, Yemen. Ranks are shown in red colour
Vertical matching of storage capacity parameters, ‘RQI’, ‘FZI’ and reservoir
potentiality against ‘RPI’ depth for the Alif and Seen members, Sab'atayn Formation,
Alif 005 well, Sab'atayn basin, Yemen. Ranks are shown in red colour
٥٦