Competence 2024
Competence 2024
Competence 2024
Abstract
For all the emphasis placed on competency development, training budgets are almost always
the first cut during any kind of down turn. For competency management to become more than a
Human Resource Management fad, it will have to demonstrate quantified financial return. This
abstract outlines one approach to quantify the return on competency development investments.
It’s simple, but worth reiterating, that economic value is created when there is a positive net
present value (NPV) of an investment’s cash flow stream. Keeping track of the net cash flow
versus time is the only way to quantify the ultimate value of an investment – a positive NPV
means an investment is a winner. The only way to know if a potential investment is likely to be a
winner is by predicting, with some level of certainty, cash flow versus time. Investments in
production facilities, exploration concessions, well re completions, new computer systems, etc.
– in fact investments in any real business enterprise – are all normally subject to this kind of
scrutiny. Of course the certainty and precision of these investment predictions vary, but they are
still subject to the same form of analysis: understanding how business choices affect cash flow.
The following key steps to Building a Competency Management Business Case are covered in
the pages to follow:
Investment. Burdened salary while employee is “coming up to speed,” and the cost to hire, train, and mentor for the
average employee.
Time to Positive Net Benefit. Time required before the average employee more than covers his cost to the
organization.
Time to Mastery. Time before the average employee adds significant value to the organization.
Net Value of Competency. Total incremental value the average employee adds to the organization after being
fully up to speed.
Investment. How will an up-to-date online product reduce the cost of new sales associate training?
Time Lag. How can explicit definition of competency speed development of the skills and behaviors that add value?
Positive Return. How will faster dissemination of the latest technology make wells more productive?
Figure 2 shows an example of a baseline and improved cash flow profile, and how modest improvements in the way competencies
are developed can more than triple the Discounted Rate of Return on Investment of training a new hire.
The examples shown in Figures 1 and 2 are meant to be a representative case. Of course, real situations will be unique for each
company and job role. In an attempt to scope the sensitivity of the various factors, Figure 3 presents a ‘spider plot’ of the change in
NPV as the key factors change.
The spider plot shown in Figure 3 is specifically for the base case from Figure 2. But the main point in
this, and most other examples, is that while the cost of development is an important factor, the ultimate
value of the development (e.g. the quality of the training) and the time to competency are even more
important factors.
Step 4
Implement program targeted at identifying and closing most valuable competency gaps
With an understanding of current economics, and reasoned estimates of how better competency
development could improve the value of core value-producing processes, it is possible to create
estimates of the value of improved competency development. If the analysis in Step 3 shows that the
value of full competency is most important, then ensure that you’ve completely defined the set of
competencies that deliver that value, and implement a competency management approach to develop
those specific skills. If the analysis shows time to competency is most important, then develop an
approach to identify and close competency gaps in the least number of calendar days. The point is the
analysis approach suggested in steps 1 to 3 above can help focus your efforts on those activities that will
truly add value.
These steps described above will let you value competency management activities.