Day 2
Day 2
and Administrative Management, emerged in the late 19th and early 20th
centuries. Here's an explanation of their key aspects:
Scientific Management:
Frederick Taylor is considered the pioneer and major proponent of
Scientific Management. His work laid the foundation for this approach to
management.
Frederick Taylor's principles of scientific management are often summarized
as the following four principles:
1. Science, not Rule of Thumb: Taylor advocated for replacing the traditional
rule-of-thumb methods with scientific analysis and experimentation to
determine the most efficient way of performing tasks. He believed that
decisions regarding work methods and processes should be based on
systematic observation and data.
2. Scientific Selection and Training: Taylor emphasized the importance of
selecting the right people for each job and providing them with appropriate
training. He believed that workers should be matched with tasks based on
their abilities and aptitude. Proper training would enable workers to
perform their tasks efficiently and effectively.
3. Cooperation between Management and Workers: Taylor emphasized the
need for collaboration and cooperation between management and workers.
He believed that management should actively seek to gain the cooperation
of workers by providing clear instructions, guidance, and support. In turn,
workers should follow management's instructions and contribute their
knowledge and skills to improve work processes.
4. Division of Labor and Responsibility: Taylor advocated for dividing the work
and responsibility between management and workers. Managers should
focus on planning, organizing, and supervising work, while workers should
focus on executing their tasks according to the prescribed methods and
instructions.
These four principles of scientific management were introduced by
Frederick Taylor as a way to improve productivity, efficiency, and the overall
functioning of organizations. However, it is important to note that these
principles have been subject to criticism and have evolved over time as
management theories and practices have advanced.
Administrative Management:
• Henri Fayol is a prominent figure associated with Administrative
Management. He outlined the fundamental principles of
management.
• Administrative Management assumes that managers possess
authority and control within organizations.
• It assumes a hierarchical structure with clear lines of authority and
responsibility.
• Administrative Management emphasizes the design of organizational
structures and processes to achieve coordination and efficiency.
• It focuses on principles of management, such as planning,
organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling.
• Henri Fayol is a prominent figure associated with Administrative
Management. He outlined the fundamental principles of
management.
Contributions:
• Principles of Management: Administrative Management contributed to
the development of a set of general principles that managers could
apply to various organizational situations.
• Management Functions: It highlighted essential management
functions, such as planning, organizing, coordinating, and controlling,
which have remained fundamental in the field of management.
• Organizational Structure: Administrative Management emphasized
the importance of a well-designed organizational structure for
effective coordination and control.
Weaknesses/Criticisms:
• Critics argue that Administrative Management neglects the human
aspect of organizations, primarily focusing on structural and
managerial aspects.
• Administrative Management provides a broad framework but lacks
specific guidance on how to address the complexities and challenges
faced by modern organizations.
• Critics suggest that the principles advocated by Administrative
Management do not account for the situational and contextual factors
that influence management practices.
Here are the 14 principles of management by Henri Fayol, along with
examples in a workplace setting:
Bureaucratic Model
Max Weber, a German sociologist and philosopher, is the primary
proponent of the bureaucratic model. He outlined its characteristics and
principles in his work "Economy and Society."
• The bureaucratic model assumes that organizations should be based
on rational principles rather than personal preferences or arbitrary
decisions.
• It assumes a clear chain of command with authority flowing from top
to bottom.
• The model assumes that organizations should operate based on well-
defined rules, procedures, and impersonal criteria.
• It assumes that work should be divided into specialized roles based
on functional expertise.
Emphasis:
• The bureaucratic model emphasizes the establishment of a formal
organizational structure with clear roles, responsibilities, and
reporting relationships.
• It highlights the importance of standardized rules and procedures to
ensure consistency and fairness in organizational operations.
• The model emphasizes the division of labor and specialization to
promote efficiency and expertise in specific tasks.
Contributions:
• The bureaucratic model contributes to organizational efficiency by
emphasizing clearly defined roles, hierarchies, and formalized
procedures.
• It promotes fairness and objectivity in decision-making by relying on
formal rules rather than personal biases.
• The model provides predictability and stability in organizational
operations through standardized procedures and hierarchical control.
Weaknesses/Criticisms:
• Critics argue that the bureaucratic model can lead to excessive
rigidity and lack of flexibility in adapting to changing circumstances.
• The adherence to formal rules and hierarchical channels of
communication can slow down decision-making processes.
• Critics suggest that the emphasis on formal rules and procedures
may dehumanize employees and overlook their individual needs and
motivations.
• The bureaucratic model may resist change and innovation due to its
emphasis on stability and established procedures.
Assumptions:
Contributions:
Weaknesses/Criticisms:
Assumptions:
1. Hierarchical Nature of Needs: Maslow's theory assumes that individuals
have a hierarchy of needs, ranging from basic physiological needs to
higher-level needs for self-actualization.
2. Sequential Progression: The theory suggests that individuals typically seek
to satisfy lower-level needs before moving on to higher-level needs.
Emphasis:
Contributions:
Weaknesses/Criticisms:
1. Cultural Variations: Critics argue that the hierarchy of needs may not
universally apply to all individuals and cultures, as cultural values and
priorities can influence the importance and order of needs.
2. Lack of Empirical Support: Some critics suggest that there is limited
empirical evidence to fully validate the hierarchical nature of needs as
proposed by Maslow.
Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory (Motivation-Hygiene Theory):
Assumptions:
Emphasis:
Contributions:
Weaknesses/Criticisms:
1. Limited Generalizability: Critics argue that the Two-Factor Theory may not
fully account for the complexity and diversity of employee motivation, as
individual preferences and situational factors can influence the relevance
and importance of motivators and hygiene factors.
2. Lack of Empirical Support: Some critics suggest that there is limited
empirical evidence to fully validate Herzberg's theory, and alternative
theories offer different explanations for employee motivation and
satisfaction.
Assumptions:
1. Theory X: Assumes that employees are inherently lazy, dislike work, and
need strict supervision and external control.
2. Theory Y: Assumes that employees are self-motivated, enjoy work, and seek
responsibility and autonomy.
Emphasis:
1. Theory X: Emphasizes the need for close supervision, strict control, and
external rewards and punishments to ensure employee compliance and
productivity.
2. Theory Y: Emphasizes the importance of providing opportunities for
employee growth, involvement, and empowerment to foster motivation,
creativity, and higher performance.
Contributions:
It's important to note that while these human relations theories have made
significant contributions to understanding employee motivation, job
satisfaction, and organizational behavior, they have also faced criticism and
limitations. Each theory offers valuable insights into different aspects of
human behavior in the workplace, and managers may find value in
combining and applying multiple theories to address the complexities of
managing human resources effectively.
CONTINGENCY
Contingency Theory:
Assumptions:
Emphasis:
1. Situational Approach: The Contingency Theory emphasizes the need to
match management practices to the specific requirements of the situation,
taking into account various internal and external factors.
2. Fit between Factors: It focuses on identifying and aligning key
organizational factors, such as structure, leadership style, and decision-
making processes, with the demands of the environment and the
organization's goals.
Proponents:
Contributions:
Weaknesses/Criticisms:
1. Complexity: Critics argue that the Contingency Theory can be complex and
challenging to apply in practice, as it requires a thorough understanding of
the numerous factors and their interactions.
2. Lack of Prescriptive Guidance: Some critics suggest that the theory lacks
specific guidelines for managers, making it difficult to determine the best-
fit approach in real-world situations.
3. Limited Predictive Power: Critics argue that the theory's reliance on
contingency factors makes it difficult to predict and prescribe management
practices with certainty.
These are the major contributions associated with each school of thought,
providing significant insights and frameworks for understanding and
practicing management.
Organizational Development (OD)
PLANNING PROCESS
The planning process involves a systematic approach to defining objectives,
determining strategies, and outlining the actions required to achieve
desired goals. It is a crucial management function that provides a roadmap
for organizations to allocate resources, make informed decisions, and
effectively execute their initiatives. Here are the key steps involved in the
planning process:
1. Establish Goals and Objectives: The first step in the planning process is to
establish clear and specific goals and objectives. Goals represent the broad
outcomes the organization wants to achieve, while objectives are specific,
measurable targets that contribute to those goals. For example:
Goal: Increase customer satisfaction. Objective: Improve customer service
response time by 20% within six months.
2. Conduct a Situation Analysis: A thorough analysis of the internal and
external environment is essential to understand the organization's current
state, identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT
analysis), and assess market trends, competition, and stakeholder
expectations. This analysis helps inform decision-making and strategy
development.
3. Formulate Strategies: Based on the analysis, strategies are developed to
achieve the established goals and objectives. Strategies are the high-level
approaches or plans of action that guide the organization's direction.
Examples of strategies include:
• Market Penetration: Increase market share by targeting new customer
segments.
• Product Development: Introduce innovative products to meet evolving
customer needs.
• Strategic Alliances: Form partnerships with complementary organizations to
expand reach and capabilities.
4. Develop Action Plans: Action plans outline the specific tasks, activities, and
timelines required to implement the strategies. They break down the
strategies into manageable steps and assign responsibilities to individuals
or teams. Action plans should be realistic, actionable, and measurable. For
instance:
Strategy: Improve employee engagement. Action Plan: Conduct employee
satisfaction survey by the end of Q1, analyze results in Q2, develop and
implement employee engagement initiatives in Q3, and measure progress
through quarterly surveys.
5. Allocate Resources: Resource allocation involves determining and allocating
the necessary financial, human, and physical resources to support the
implementation of the action plans. This step ensures that the organization
has the required resources to execute the plans effectively.
6. Implement and Monitor: The plans are put into action, and progress is
monitored regularly to ensure that activities are on track, objectives are
being met, and adjustments are made as needed. Key performance
indicators (KPIs) are established to track progress and evaluate success.
7. Evaluate and Review: The planning process includes ongoing evaluation
and review to assess the effectiveness of the plans and make adjustments
as necessary. This involves gathering feedback, measuring outcomes
against objectives, identifying areas of improvement, and incorporating
lessons learned into future planning cycles.
PLANNING TECHNIQUES
Planning techniques are tools and methods used to facilitate the planning
process and enhance decision-making. These techniques help organizations
and individuals analyze information, generate ideas, prioritize actions, and
develop effective plans. Here are some commonly used planning
techniques:
Types of Communication:
Elements of Communication:
Flow of Communication: