The-Teacher-And-The-School-Curriculum
The-Teacher-And-The-School-Curriculum
The-Teacher-And-The-School-Curriculum
DEEJAE B. QUILALA,RN,LPT,CSE,MAED
Life is a School and problems are the curriculum-.- R. warren
CURRICULUM
Etymologically, the term curriculum is derived from the Latin word “currere” which means run or run-way or a
running course. Thus curriculum means a course to be run for reaching a certain goal.
Formal, non-formal or informal education do not exist without a curriculum.
Classroom will be empty with no curiculum
Teachers will have nothing to do, if there is no curriculum
Curriculum is the heart of the teaching profession
In our current Philippine educational system, different schools are established in different educational levels which have
corresponding recommended curricula. The educational levels are:
1. Basic Education. Kindergarten, Grade 1-6, Grade 7-10, Grade 11-12. The new basic education levels provided in
the K to 12 Enhanced Curriculum of 2013 of the DepEd
2. Technical Vocational Education. Post-secondary technical vocational educational and training taken care of
TESDA. For the TechVoc track in SHS of DepEd, DepEd and TESDA work in close coordination.
3. Higher Education. Bachelor’s Degree and Graduate Degrees (Master’s and Doctorate) which under the regulation
of the Commission on Higher Education (CHED)
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 1
includes facilities where learning occurs outside or inside the four-walled building. These include the playground,
science laboratory, audio-visual rooms,zoo, museum, market or the plaza. These are the places where authentic
learning through direct experiences occur.
5. Assessed Curriculum. Taught and supported curricula have to be evaluated to find out if the teacher has succeeded
or not in facilitating learning. In the process of teaching and at the end of every lesson or teaching episode, an
assessment is made. It can either be assessment of learning, assessment as learning or assessment of learning. If the
process is to find the progress of learning, then the assessed curriculum is for learning, but if it is to find out how
much has been learned or mastered, then it is assessment of learning. Either way, such curriculum is the assessed
curriculum.
6. Learned Curriculum. How do we know if the student has learned? We always believe that if a student changed
behavior, he/she has learned. For example, from a non-reader to a reader or from not knowing to knowing or from
being disobedient to being obedient. The positive outcome of teaching is an indicator of learning. Thes are measured
by tools in assessment, which can indicate the cognitive,affective and psychomotor outcomes. Learned curriculum
will also demonstrate higher order and critical thinking and lifelong skills.
7. Hidden/Implicit Curriculum. This curriculum is not deliberately planned, but has a great impact on the behavior
of the learner. Peer influence, school environment, media, parental pressurs, societal changes, cultural practices,
natural calamities, are some factors that create the hidden curriculum. Teachers should be sensitive and aware of
this hidden curriculum. Teachers must have good foresight to include these in the written curriculum, in order to
bring to the surface what are hidden.
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 2
Arthur Bestor as an essentialist believes that the mission of the school should be intellectual training, hence
curriculum should focus on the fundamental intellectual disciplines of grammar, literature and writing. It should
include mathematics, science, history and foreign language.
Joseph Schwab thinks that the sole source of curriculum is a discipline thus the subject areas such as Science,
Mathematics, Social Studies, English and many more. In college, academic disciplines are labelled as humanities,
sciences, languages, mathematics among others. He coined the word discipline as a ruling doctrine for curriculum
development.
Phillip Phenix asserts that curriculum should consist entirely of knowledge which comes from various disciplines.
CURRICULUM AS A CONTENT
Criteria in the selection of content
1. Significance. Content should contribute to ideas, concepts, principles and generalization that should attain the
overall purpose of the curriculum. It is significant if content becomes the means of developing cognitive,
affective or psychomotor skills of the learner
2. Validity. The authenticity of the subject matter forms its validity. Knowledge becomes obsolete with the fast
changing times. Thus there is a need for validity check and verification at a regular interval, because content
which may be valid in its original form may not be continue to be valid in the current times.
3. Utility. Usefulness of the content in the curriculum is relative to the learners who are going to us these.
4. Learnability. The complexity of the content should be within the range of experiences of the learner. This is
based on the psychological principles of learning.
5. Feasibility. Can the subject content be learned within the time allowed, resources available, expertise of the
teachers and the nature of the learners
6. Interest. Will the learners take interest in the content? Why ? Are the contents meaningful? What value will
the content have in the present and future life of the learners? Interest is one of the driving forces for students
better
Guide in the selection of the content in the curriculum
1. Commonly used in the daily life.
2. Appropriate to the maturity levels and abilities of the learners
3. Valuable in meeting the needs and competencies of the future career
4. Related to other subject fields or discipline for complementation and integration
5. Important to transfer of learning to other disciplines
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 3
Continuity. Content when viewed as a curriculum should continuously flow as it was before, to where is it now,
and where it will be in the future. It should be perennial. It endures time. Content may not be in the same form and
substance as seen in the past since changes and developments curriculum occurs. Constant repetition, reinforcement
and enhancement of content are all elements of continuity.
CURRICULUM AS A PROCESS
When curriculum is approached as PROCESS, guiding principles are presented.
1. Curriculum process in the form of teaching methods or strategies are means to achieve the end.
2. There is no single best process or method. Its effectiveness will depends on the desired learning outcomes, the
learners, support materials and the teacher.
3. Curriculum process should stimulate the learners desire to develop the cognitive, affective, psychomotor domains
in each individual.
4. In the choice of methods, learning and teaching styles should be considered.
5. Every method or process should result to learning outcomes which can be described as cognitive, affective and
psychomotor.
6. Flexibility in the use of the process or methods should be considered. An effective process will always result to
learning outcomes.
7. Both teaching and learning are the two important processes in the implementation of curriculum.
CURRICULUM AS A PRODUCT
The product from the curriculum is a student equipped with the knowledge, skills and values to function effectively
and efficiently. The real purpose of education is to bring about significant changes in students pattern of behavior.
Curriculum product is expressed in form of outcomes which are referred to as the achieve learning outcomes. There
may be several desired learning outcomes,but if the process is not successful, then no learning outcomes will be
achieved.
Tyler’s model shows that in curriculum development, the following considerations should be made
1. Purposes of the school/ Objectives
2. Educational experiences related to the purposes
3. Organization of the experiences
4. Evaluation of the experiences
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 4
2. Hilda Taba Model: Grassroots Approach
Hilda improved on Tyler’s model. She believed that teachers should participate in developing a curriculum. As
a grassroots approach Taba begins from the bottom, rather than from the top as what Tyler proposed. She
presented seven major steps to her linear model which are the following:
1. Diagnosis of learner’s needs and expectations of the larger society
2. Formulation of learning objectives
3. Selection of learning content
4. Organization of learning contents
5. Selection of learning experiences
6. Organize learning experiences
7. Determination of what to evaluate and the means of doing
1. Goals, Objectives and domains - Curriculum planners begin by specifying the major educational goals and specific
objectives they wish to accomplish. Each major goal represents a curriculum domain: personal development, human
relations, continued learning skills and specialization. The goals, objectives and domains are identified and chosen based
on research findings accreditation standards, and views of the different stakeholders.
2. Curriculum Designing - Designing a curriculum follows after appropriate learning opportunities are determined and
how each opportunity provided. Will the curriculum be designed along the lines of academics disciplines, or according to
student needs and interests or along themes? These are some of the questions that need to be answered at this stage of the
development process
3. Curriculum Implementation - A designed curriculum is now ready for implementation. Teachers then prepare
instructional plans where instructional objectives are specified and appropriate teaching methods and strategies are
utilized to achieve the desired learning outcomes among students.
4. Evaluation - The last step of the curriculum model is evaluation. A comprehensive evaluation using a variety involve
the total educational programme of the school and the curriculum plan, the effectiveness of instruction and the
achievement of students. Through the evaluation process curriculum planner and developers can determine whether or not
the goals of the school and the objectives of instruction have been met.
II. DESIGNING THE CURRICULUM ;The Teacher as a Curriculum Designer
Building on Peter Oliva’s 10 Axioms for Curriculum Designers
Before a teacher designs a curriculum, it would be a great importance to connect to the fundamental concepts and ideas
about the curriculum. Every curriculum designer, implementer, or evaluator should take in mind the following general
axioms as a guide in curriculum development (Oliva, 2003).
1. Curriculum change is inevitable, necessary, and desirable.
Earlier it was stated that one of the characteristics of curriculum is its being dynamic. Beacause of this, teachers should
respond to the changes that occur in schools and in its context. Societal development and knowledge revolution come so
fast that the need to address the changing condition requires new curriculum designs.
2. Curriculum is a product of its time.
A relevant curriculum should respond to changes brought about by current social forces, philosophical posistions,
psychological principles, new knowledge, and educational reforms. This also called timeless.
3. Curriculum changes made earlier can exist concurrently with newer curriculum changes.
A revision in a curriculum starts and end slowly. More often, curriculum is gradually phased in and phased out, thus the
changes that occur can coexist and oftentimes overlap for long periods of time.
4. Curriculum change depends on people who will implement the change.
Teachers who will implement the curriculum should be involved in its development, hence should know how to design a
curriculum. Because the teachers are the implementers of the curriculum, it is best that they should design and own the
changes. This will ensure an effective and long lasting change.
5. Curriculum development is a cooperative group activity.
Group decision in some aspects of curriculum development are suggested. Consultations with stakeholders when possible
will add to sense of ownership. Even learners should participate in some aspects of curriculum should involve a broad range
of stakeholders to gain their understanding, support and input.
6. Curriculum development is a decision-making process made from choice of alternatives.
A curriculum developer or designer must decide what contents to teach, philosophy or point of view to support, how to
provide for multicultural groups, what methods or strategies, and what type of evaluation to use.
7. Curriculum development is an ongoing process.
Continuous monitoring, examination, evaluation, and improvement of curricula are to be considered in the design of the
curriculum. As the needs of learners change, as society changes, and as new knowledge and technology appear, the
curriculum must change.
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 5
8. Curriculum development is more effective if it is a comprehensive process, rather than a “piecemeal”.
A curriculum design should be based on a careful plan, should clearly establish intended outcomes, support resources
and needed time available and should equip teaching staff pedagogically.
9. Curriculum development is more effective when it follows a systematic process.
A curriculum design is composed of desired outcomes, subject matter content complemented with references, set of
procedures, needed materials and resources and evaluation procedure which can be placed in a matrix.
10. Curriculum development starts from where the curriculum.
Curriculum planners and designers should begin with existing curriculum, an existing design is a good starting point
for any teacher who plans to enhance and enrich a curriculum.
1. SUBJECT-CENTERED DESIGN
This is a curriculum design that focuses on the content of the curriculum. The subject-centered design corresponds
mostly to the textbook because textbooks are usually written based the specific subject or course. Henry Morrison and
William Harris are the few curricularist who firmly believed in this design. As practiced, school hours are allocated to
different school subjects such as Science, Mathematics, Language, Social Studies, Physical Education, and others. This is
also practiced in the Philippines, because a school day is divided into class period, a school year into quarters or semester.
Most of the schools using specific subject discipline content.
Subject-Centered curriculum design has also some variation which are focused on the individual subject, specific
discipline and a combination of subjects or disciplines which are a broad field or interdisciplinary.
1.1. Subject design. Subject design curriculum is the oldest and so far the most familiar design for teachers, parents
and other laymen. According to the advocates, subject design has an advantage because it is easy to deliver. Textbooks are
written and support instructional materials are commercially available. Teachers are familiar with the format, because they
were educated using also the design. In the Philippines educational system, the number of subjects in the elementary
education is fewer than in the secondary level. In college, the number of subjects also differs according to the degree
programs being pursued. For each subject, a curriculum is being designed.
However the drawback of this design is that sometimes, learning is so compartmentalized. It stressed so much the
content and forgets about students natural tendencies, interest and experiences. The teacher becomes the dispenser of
knowledge and the learners are the simply the empty vessels to receive the information or content from the teacher. This is
a traditional approach to teaching and learning.
1.2. Discipline design. This curriculum design model is related to the subject design. However, while subject design
centers only on the cluster of content, discipline design focuses on academic discipline. Discipline refers to specific
knowledge learned through a method which the scholars used to study a specific content of their fields. Students in history
should learn the subject matter like historians, students in bilology should learn how the biologists learn, and so with
students in mathematics, who should learn how mathematicians learn. In the same manners, teachers should teach how the
scholars in the discipline will convey the particular knowledge.
Discipline design model of curriculum is often used in college, but not in the elementary or secondary levels. So from
the subject centered curriculum, curriculum moves higher to a discipline when the students are more mature and are already
moving towards their career path or discipline as science, mathematics, psychology, humanities, history and others.
1.3. Correlation design. Coming from a core, correlated curriculum design links separate subject designs in order to
reduce fragmentation. Subjects are related to one another and still maintain their identity. For example, English Literature
and social studies correlate well in the elementary level. In the two subjects, while history is being studied, different
literary pieces during the historical period are also being studied. The same is true science becomes the core; mathematics
is related to it , as they are taken in chemistry physics and biology. Another example is literature as the core with art,
music, history, geography related to it. To use correlated design, teachers should come together and plan their lessons
cooperatively.
1.4. Broad field design/interdisciplinary Broad field design or interdisciplinary is a variation of the subject-centered
design. Thus design was made to cure the compartmentalization of the separate subjects and integrate the contents that are
related to one another. Thus subjects such as geography, economics, political sciences, anthropology, sociology and
history are fused into one subject called social studies. Language arts will include grammar, literature, linguistics, spelling
and composition.
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 6
Sometimes called holistic curriculum, broad fields draw around themes and integration. Interdisciplinary design is
similar to thematic design, where a specific theme identified, and all other subject areas revolve around the theme.
2. LEARNER-CENTERED DESIGN
Among the progressive educational psychologists, the learner is the center of the educative process. This emphasis is
very strong in the elementary leverl, however; more concern has been placed on the secondary and even the tertiary levels.
Although in high school, the subject or content has become the focus and in the college level, the discipline is the center,
both levels still recognize the importance of the learner in the curriculum.
2.1. Child-centered design.
This design is often sttributed to the influence of John Dewey, Rouseau, Pestallozi and Froebel. This curriculum design
is anchored on the needs and interest of the child. Thew learnere is not considered a passive individual but one who engages
with his/her environment. One learns by doing. Learners actively create, construct meanings and understanding as viewed
by the constructivists. In the child-centered design, learners interact with the teachers and the environment, thus there is a
collaborative effort on both sides to plan lessons, select content and do activities together. Learning is a product of the
child’s interaction with the environment.
2.2. Experience-centered design
This design is similar to the child-centered design. Although the focus remains to be the child, experience-centered
design believes that the interests and needs of learners cannot be pre-planned. Instead, experiences of the learners become
the starting point of the curriculum, thus the school environment is left open and free. Learners are made to choose from
various activities that the teacher provides. The learners are empowered to shape their own learning from the different
opportunities given by the teacher. In a school where experience-centered curriculum is provided, different learning centers
are found, time is flexible and children are free to make options. Activities revolve around different emphasis such as
touching, feeling imagining, constructing, relating and others.
The emergence of multiple intelligence theory blends well with experience-centered design curriculum.
2.3. Humanistic design.
The key influence in this curriculum design is Abraham Maslow and Carl Rogers. Maslow’s theory of self-actualization
explains that a person who achieves this level is accepting of self,others and nature; is simple, spontaneous and natural; is
open to different experiences; possesses emphathy and sympathy towards the less fortunate among the many others. The
person can achieve this state of self-actualization later in life but has to start the process while still in school. Carl Rogers,
on the other hand, believed that a person can enhance self-directed learning by improving self-understanding, the basic
attitude to guide behavior.
In humanistic curriculum design, the development of self is the ultimate objective of learning. It stresses the whole
person and the integration of thinking, feeling and doing. It considers the cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains to
be interconnected and must be addressed in the curriculum.it stresses the development of positive self-concept and
interpersonal skills.
3. PROBLEM-CENTERED DESIGN
Generally, problem-centered design draws on social problems, needs, interest and abilities of the learners. various
problems are given emphasis. There are those that center on life situations, contemporary life problems, areas subject
boundaries and must be based on the needs, concerns and abilities of the students. two examples are given for the problem-
centered design curriculum.
3.1. Life-situations Design.
What makes the design unique is that the contents are organized in ways that allows students to clearly view problem
areas. It uses the past and the present experiences of learners as a means to analyze the basic areas of living. As a starting
point, the pressing immediate problems of the society and the students existing concerns are utilized. Based on Herbert
Spencer’s curriculum writing, his emphases were activities that sustain life, enhance life, aid in rearing children, maintain
leisure tasks and feelings. The connection of subject matter to real situations increases the relevance of the curriculum.
3.2. Core problem design.
Another example of problem-centered design is core design. It centers on general education and the problems are based
on the common human activities. The central focus of the core design includes common needs, problems, and concerns of
the learners. popularized by Faunce and Bossing in 1959, it presented ways on how to proceed using core design of a
curriculum.
CURRICULUM MAPPING
A model for designing, refining, upgrading and reviewing the curriculum resulting in a framework that provides
form, focus and functions. (Hale and Dunlap, 2010)
An ongoing process or “ work- in- progress”
Involves the teacher and other stakeholders who have common concerns
May be done by teachers alone, a group of teachers teaching the same subjects, the department, the whole school
or district or the whole educational system.
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 7
3. Curriculum mapping verifies, clarifies and established alignment between what students do in their courses and
what is taught in the classrooms and assessed as their learning
4. The curriculum maps visually show important elements of the curriculum and how they contribute to student
learning
5. Curriculum mapping connects all initiatives from instruction, pedagogies, assessment and professional
development.
The Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers (PPST) can be used as anchor in curriculum audit. The
PPST aims to set clear expectations of teachers along well- defined career stages of professional development from
beginning to distinguished practice. The Philippines has adopted and implemented the PPST through the DO 42, 2. 2017.
Teacher educators, program heads, curriculum planners may refer to the PPST to “quality audit” the pre-service teacher
education curriculum as basis for quality assurance provision of teacher education
CHED CMOs 74-83 are standards set by the Commission on Higher Education, specific to the degree program
being offered. E.g. CMO 74, s. 2017 contain standards for Bachelor of Elementary Education and CMO 75, s.2017 contains
standards for Bachelor of Secondary Education.
Competency Framework for Teachers in South East Asia (CFT-SEA) of SEAMEO and SEAMES and the
European Tuning Asia South East (TASE) teacher competencies.
Curriculum Implementation
Putting into practice the written curriculum that has been designed in syllabi, course study, curricular guides, and
subjects.
Interaction between the curriculum that has been written and planned and the persons (teachers) who are in charge
to deliver it. (Orstein and Hunkins, 1998)
Trying out of a new practice and what it looks like when actually used in a school system.It simply means that
implementation should bring the desired change and improvement.
In the classroom context, curriculum implementation means “teaching” what has been written in the lesson plan.
(Miniscule curriculum)
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 8
Three important Elements in the process of change:
1. Developmental- in the sense that it should develop multiple perspective, increase integration and make learning
autonomous, create a climate of openness and Trust, and appreciate the firm strengths of the teacher. There should be teacher
support in trying new task, reflection on the new experiences and challenge.
2. Participatory- for Curriculum implementation to succeed, it should be participatory, especially because others
stakeholders like peers, school leaders, parents and curriculum Specialists are necessary missing machine. Characteristics
of teacher styles, commitment, and willingness to change, skills, and Readiness are critical to implementation.. Key players
should be also sought as this a positive starting point. Involvement and participation encourage sense of ownership and
accountability. Participation builds a learning community which is very necessary in curriculum implementation.
3. Supportive- curriculum implementation is required in the process of change. Material support like supplies, equipment
and conductive learning environment like classroom and laboratory should be made available. Likewise, human support is
very much needed. They too have to train to understand how to address curriculum change as a part of their instructional as
well as management function.
CURRICULUM STAKEHOLDERS
1. Learners are at the core of the curriculum.
To what extent are the students involved in curriculum development? The old view that students are mere recipients of the
curriculum, is now changing. Just have more dynamic participation from the planning, designing, implementing and
evaluating. At the end of the curriculum development process, the fundamental question asked is: Have the students learned?
2. Teachers are Curricularist.
Teacher are stakeholders who plan, design, teach, implement and evaluate the curriculum. They put their hearts into what
they do. They are very mindful that in the center of everything they do, is the learner.
Some of the rules that the teachers do in curriculum implementation.
Guiding, facilitating and directing the activities of the learners;
Choosing the activities and the methods to be utilized;
Choosing the materials that are necessary for the activity;
Evaluating the whole implementation process and
Making a decision whether to continue, modify or terminate the curriculum.
3. School leaders are Curriculum Manager.
Principals and School Heads, too, have important roles in curriculum implementation process in schools. They should
understand fully the need for change and the implementation process. They should be ready to assist the teachers and the
students in the implementation. Communication line should be open to all concerned should the school leaders lead in
curriculum teamwork
4. Parents.
Parents are significant School partners. Schools have one way of engaging parents cooperation through Brigada Eskwela.
In this event, parents will be able to know the situation in the school. Most of them parents volunteer to help. They can also
be tapped in various co-curricular activities as chaperones to children in boy and girl scouting, science camping and the like.
5. Community as curriculum resources and learning environment
" It takes the whole village to educate the child"
All the barangay leaders, the elders, other citizens and residents of the community have a stake in the curriculum. It is the
biggest school community that becomes the venue of learning. The rich natural and human resources of the community can
assist in educating the children. The community is the reflection of the schools influence in the school is a reflection of the
community support.
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 9
IV. EVALUATING THE CURRICULUM
Curriculum Evaluation is a new idea for many teachers, not knowing that every day, the teacher is involved in several
components of evaluation. There are two ways of looking at curriculum evaluation:
1. Curriculum Program Evaluation. Refers to the overall aspects of a curriculum as a subject, degree program, curriculum
reform program and the like. Some examples are: The curriculum development as a subject Bachelor of Education as a
degree, Kto12 as a curricular reform, outcomes based education as a process, Mother Tongue based multilingual education
as a program.
Program evaluation will be using program evaluation models like Bradley Effectiveness model, Tyler's objective centered
model, Stufflebeam's CIPP Model , and Scriven's consumer oriented model among others
2. Components of a curricular programs. This will cover separate evaluation for a curriculum components such as (1)
achieved learning outcomes (2) teaching learning process (3) instruction materials (4) assessment of the learning outcomes.
Curricular program component evaluation refers directly to the assessment of curriculum contents and processes as
implemented every day in view of the learning outcomes as either formative or summative.
PERSONS DEFINITION
Ornstein, A & Hunkins, F, Curriculum evaluation is a process done in order to gather data that enables one to
(1998) decide whether to accept, change, and eliminate the whole curriculum of a textbook.
McNeil, J(1977) Evaluation answers two question: do planned learning opportunities programmers,
courses and activities as developed as organized actually produce desired results? 2.
How can a curriculum best be improved?
Gay, L.(1985) Evaluation is to identify the weaknesses and strengths as well as problems encountered
in the implementation, to improve the curriculum development process. It is to
determine the effectiveness of and the returns on allocated finance
Olivia, P. (1988) It is a process of delineating, obtaining and providing useful information for judging
alternatives for purposes of modifying, or eliminating the curriculum
REASONS FOR CURRICULUM EVALUATION
1. Curriculum evaluation identifies the strengths and weaknesses of an existing curriculum that will be the basis of the
intended plan, design or implementation. This is referred to as the needs assessment.
2. When evaluation is done in the middle of the curriculum development, it will tell if the design or implemented
curriculum can produce or is producing the desired result. This is related to monitoring.
3. Based on some standards, curriculum evaluation will guide whether the results have equaled or exceeded the
standards that can be labeled as success. This is sometimes called terminal assessment.
4. Curriculum evaluation provides information necessary for teachers, school managers, curriculum specialist for
policy recommendations that will enhance achieve learning outcomes. This is the basis of decision making.
Broad Involvement Is there evidence of involvement of the different curriculum stakeholders in the
planning, designing and implementation and review of the curriculum?
Long Range Planning Is review cycle followed within the period of planning and implementation of the
curriculum?
Positive Human Did the initial thoughts about the curriculum come from teachers, principals,
Relations curriculum leaders and other stakeholders?
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 10
Theory-Into Practice Is there clarity of vision, mission, graduation outcomes, program philosophy, learning
outcomes in the curriculum?
Planned Change Are there tangible evidence to show that the internal and external publics accept the
developed program?
If any of the indicators is answered with “No”, actions should be made to make it Yes
4. Stake Responsive Model. Responsive model is oriented more directly to program activities than program intents.
Evaluation focuses more on the activities rather than intent or purposes.
The curriculum evaluator follows the steps below
Step 1 Meets with stakeholders to identify their perspectives and intentions regarding curriculum evaluation
Step 2 Draws from step 1 documents to determines the scope of the evaluation
Step 3 Observes the curriculum closely to identify the unintended sense of implementation and any deviations
from announced intents
Step 4 Identifies the stated real purposes of the program and the various audiences
Step 5 Identifies the problems of the curriculum evaluation at hand and identifies an evaluation design with
needed data
Step 6 Selects the means needed to collect data or information.
Step 7 Implements the data collections procedure
Step 8 Organizes the information into themes
Step 9 Decides with stakeholders the most appropriate formats for the report.
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 11
5. Scriven Consumer Oriented Evaluation
Michael Scriven, in 1967 introduced this evaluation among many others when education products flooded the market.
Consumers of educational products which are needed to support an implemented curriculum often use consumer-oriented
evaluation. These products are used in schools which require a purchasing decision. These products include textbooks,
modules, educational technology like software and other instructional materials. Even teachers and schools themselves
nowadays write and produce these materials for their own purposes.
Placing Value to Assessment Results from KPUP (D.O. 73. 2012) to Written Work, Performance Task, Quarterly Exam
(WW-PT-QE) D.O &s. 2015
While the KPUP is still utilized in the grading system, however it has been slightly modified by WW-PT-QE.
A summative assessment is composed of Written Work (WW) Performance Tasks (PT) and Quarterly Assessment (QA)
this will be explained in the table below.
Performance Task 1. Involve students in the learning process individually or in At the end of the lesson
(PT) collaboration with team mates over a period of time focusing on a topic/
2. Give students opportunities to demonstrate and integrate their skill lesson
knowledge, understanding and skills about topics or lessons learned in a Several times during
specific real-life situation by performing and/ producing evidence of the quarter
their learning
3. Give students the freedom to express their learning in appropriate and
diverse ways.
4. Encourage students inquiry, integration of knowledge, understanding,
and skills in various contexts beyond the assessment period
Quarterly Synthesize all the learning skills, concepts and values learned in an Once, at the end of the
Assessment (QA) entire quarter quarter
Grades at the end of the school year and how these are computed
Kindergarten: Use of checklist, anecdotal records and portfolios a used instead of numerical grades which are based
on Curriculum Guide.
Grade 1 to Grade 10 (Junior High)
1. The average of the quarter grades produce the end of the grade year
2. The general average is computed by dividing the sum of all final grades by the total numbers of learning areas. Each
learning area has equal weight has equal weight.
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 12
Grade 11 and 12 (Senior High)
1. The average of the Quarterly Grade produces the semester grade.
2. The general average is computed by dividing the sum of all semestral Final Grades by the Total Number of Learning
Areas.
3. The Senior High School Grading Components
What has been planned, should be implemented and what has been implemented should be evaluated.
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 13
V. CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT, REFORMS AND ENHANCEMENT
Curriculum designers need to enhance the curriculum and curricular innovations to respond to the changing educational
landscape in the country as well as in other parts of the globe. It is most necessary that as a future curricularist and a
teacher, you should be familiar with what is happening and will happen in our curriculum. There is no substitute for being
READY and INFORMED.
Republic Act 10533, otherwise known as the Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013, is the latest educational reform in
Philippine Education signed into law by President Benigno Aquino III last May 15. 2013. It is an act enhancing the
Philippine Basic Education system by strengthening its curriculum and increasing the number of years for basic education
appropriating funds therefore and for other purposes The Enhanced Basic Education Act of 2013 popularly known as K to
12 includes one (1) year of kindergarten education, six (6) years of elementary education, and six (6) years of secondary
education. This six-year secondary education includes four (4) years of junior high school and two (2) years of senior high
school. With K to 12, the existing 10 years of basic education is increased to 12 years with Kindergarten education as a
prerequisite to entry in Grade 1.
Why K to 12?
K to 12 makes the Philippine education system at par with the international standard of 12-year basic education
thereby contributing to a better educated society capable of pursuing productive employment, entrepreneurship, or
higher education studies.
After going through kindergarten, elementary, junior high and a specialized senior high school program, every K to
12 graduate is ready to go into different paths - higher education, middle level skills development, employment, or
entrepreneurship.
The K to 12 graduates are also expected to be equipped with 21 century skills like information, media and
technology skills, learning and innovation skills, effective communication skills, and life and career skills.
Let's consider these existing realities in Philippine education that became the bases of the K to 12 implementation:
One frequently asked question raised during the advocacy period for the K to 12 Curriculum was this: "Filipino students
can do in ten (10) years what students in foreign countries do in twelve (12) years. A number of our Filipino graduates who
went through ten years of basic education excel in studies as well as in their place of work abroad, so why add two years
more?"
This may be true. But for as long as the international standard is twelve years of basic education that will remain to be
the standard and will apply to all including brilliant and exceptional Filipino students and graduates.
In fact, there are cases where our Filipino scholars with Master's degrees who have to enroll in additional Master's
subjects before being allowed to pursue their doctorate degrees applied for. Why the additional Master's subjects?
The reason given is the short, ten-year basic education in the Philippines.
In other words, the Philippines has no choice but to comply with the twelve-year basic education. In the first place,
this has been a consistent recommendation of past surveys done on the Philippine educational system.
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 14
The short duration of basic education in the Philippines resulted to 15 year old graduates who are not legally
employable. With the implementation of the K to 12, the graduates of senior high is 18 years old who is legally
employable.
Below are the learning areas comprising the core curriculum. (DepEd Memo 13 s 2013)
The Senior High School Curriculum
There are four tracks in Senior High School. These are Academic track, TechVoc track, Sports and Arts and Design
Track. The academic track has four strands namely 1) Science, Technology, Engineering and Math (STEM) 2) Humanities
and Social Sciences (HUMSS), 3)
Accounting, Business and Management (ABM) and 4) General Academic Strand (GAS).
This means that at Grade 11, a student chooses which track to pursue and if he/she chooses the academic he/she
must also choose which strand. If a student intends to go to college after Grade 12, then he/she must take the academic track.
The college program which he/she wants to enroll in determines which strand to take STEM, HUMSS or ABM. If a Senior
High School student wants to pursue TechVoc courses in Technical Education Skills Development Authority (TESDA),
he/she takes the TechVoc track. He/She who is interested in Arts and Design will pursue the Arts and Design track. The
Sports track will be for any sports- minded Senior High School student.
Teaching-Learning in OBE
Teaching is teaching if learners learn. Learning is measured by its outcome. Whatever approach to teaching is used, the
intent should focus on learning rather than on teaching. Subjects do not exist in isolation, but links between them should be
made. It is important that students learn how to learn, hence a teacher should be innovative. How then should teaching-
learning be done in OBE? Here are some tips:
Teachers must prepare students adequately. This can be done if the teachers know what they want the students to
learn and what learning outcomes to achieve. Prerequisite knowledge is important, thus a review is necessary at the
start of a lesson.
Teachers must create a positive learning environment. Students should feel, that regardless of individual uniqueness,
the teacher is always there to help. Teacher and student relationship is important. The classroom atmosphere should
provide respect for diverse kind of learners.
Teachers must help their students to understand, what they have to learn, why they should learn it (what use it will
be now and in the future) and how will they know that they have learned.
Teachers must use a variety of teaching methods. The most appropriate strategy should be used taking into account
the learning outcome teachers want the students to achieve. Also to consider are the contents, the characteristic of
the students, the resources available and the teaching skill of the teacher. Even if OBE is learner-centered,
sometimes more direct, time-tested methods of teaching will be appropriate.
Teachers must provide students with enough opportunities to use the new knowledge and skills that they gain. When
students do this, they can explore with new learning, correct errors and adjust their thinking. Application of learning
is encouraged rather than mere accumulation of these.
Teacher must help students to bring each learning to a personal closure that will make them aware of what they
learned.
Here are additional key points in teaching-learning in OBE which show the shifts from a traditional to an OBE view.
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 15
Industrial Revolution 4.0 (IR) and Education 4.0 Schwab
IR 1.0 was the invention of the steam engine. With the steam engine, human labor was replaced by the machine. Many
laborers lost their jobs because machines did their jobs even more efficiently.
IR 2.0 was the age of science and mass production. Things started to speed up with the discovery of electricity. There were
a number of key inventions - gasoline engines, airplanes, chemical fertilizer. Advancements in science weren't limited to
the laboratory, Scientific principles were brought right into the factories, the most notable of which is the assembly line,
which effectively powered mass production. Recall here Henry Ford's company where by the early part of the 20th century
mass-produced cars with gasoline engine built on an assembly line.
IR 3.0 is the digital revolution. We moved from analog electronic and mechanical devices to digital technology which
dramatically disrupted industries, especially global communications. We are now enjoying the blessings of digital
revolution- computers. cellphones. We used to tune in our television with an antenna (analog). This is now replaced by an
Internet-connected tablet that lets you stream movies (digital).
IR 4.0 is computers connected to computers. It is interconnectivity. It's the Internet of Things (IoT), Artificial Intelligence.
In IR4.0 we have robots, driverless cars, genetic sequencing and editing, miniaturized sensors, and 3D printing, to name
some. We get digitally connected to one another across the globe. We can know anything, anytime, anywhere. Global
community connects everything, everywhere always the INTERNET of Everything. Stem cell curing becomes obsolete.
With genetic sequencing and editing, we can now remove the sickness.
Education 4.0
With all these profound changes brought about by IR 4.0, how should education be? What and how should schools teach?
What should curriculum consist of? What should curriculum focus on? The answer or answers to these questions are actually
what Education 4.0 means. In other words, Education 4.0 is the response of the education sector to all the changes brought
about by IR 4.0.
Schools have no choice but to respond to the dramatic changes brought about by IR 4.0, if they have to be relevant. Higher
education institutions cannot ignore these developments or else become irrelevant. To be relevant, schools should consider
some Statistics:
80% of the skills trained in the last 50 years can now be outperformed by machines
65% of children who entered in 2018 will work in a job that have not been invented yet
49% of current jobs have the potential for machine replacement (Statistics, Whelsh, 2018)
With the efficiency of machines, routinized jobs can be done by machines with greater efficiency than human laborers, So
human laborers must be taught how to use the machines at their advantage. But machines lack important human
characteristics such as creativity, flexibility, compassion and empathy. School curricula then should focus on the
development of these innately human characteristics of creativity, flexibility, compassion and empathy. Actually, creativity
and flexibility, compassion and empathy form part of the 10 skills demanded by IR 4.0 enumerated by the World Economic
Forum Report as follows:
Complex Problem Solving
Critical Thinking
Creativity
People Management
Coordinating with Others
Emotional Intelligence
Judgment and Decision-making
Service Orientation
Negotiation
Cognitive Flexibility
Course content must necessarily, purposively (not incidental teaching) include or integrate these 10 skills. They
must be taught to welcome machines and other features brought by IR 4.0. Learners should be taught that AI can enhance
or optimize creativity but cannot create. Al is a great creative tool for scientists, artists, musicians and writers. Learners
must therefore be taught how to use machines with their unprecedented processing power, storage capacity and their
unlimited access to knowledge. Learners must be made to understand that Artificial Intelligence (AI) can't replace workers
in creative jobs but can do the routine jobs at the service of humans
Teaching methods, strategies and activities must be such that these top skills for success in IR 4.0 must be
developed. Problem- based learning (PBL), project-based learning (PrBL), service learning, immersion, shadowing,
internship are expected regular features of teaching-learning methods and strategies.
Modes of teaching shall be flexible. With knowledge anywhere, anytime, lesson delivery can be flexible. We can
have flipped classrooms where students are given the problems or questions in class and they go out to search for the answers
to the problems or questions then come back to share their answers. One can combine face-to-face instruction with on-line
learning.
Assessment of learning will not be limited to paper-and-pencil test. The assessment of knowledge, skills and values is done
though more authentic modes of assessment.
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 16
The Most Essential Learning Competencies (MELCS)
A part of this Basic Education Learning Continuity Plan (BE-LCP) is the 60% reduction of learning competencies
found in the K to 12 Curriculum Guide from 14,171 competencies listed in the K to 12 Curriculum Guide to 5,689 Most
Essential Learning Competencies (MELCs).
One common problem that teachers meet is an overcrowded curriculum. There is so much to cover that teachers tend to do
mile wide-inch deep teaching. The reduction of the number of competencies may lead to more focused teaching. Teaching
should focus on essentials. "The key to success is doing less"
Various Curriculum Delivery Modes
Delivery mode is contextualized in the DepEd's Learning Continuity Plan. Since schools and communities are differently
situated, the choice of the learning delivery modality of schools will depend on the local COVID-19 situation as well as
access to certain learning platforms.
The various curriculum delivery modes include: 1) Online learning, 2) Alternative Delivery Mode, 3) Distance Learning,
4) Homeschooling, and 5) Alternative Learning System.
Alternative delivery mode (ADM) refers to the nontraditional education program recognized by the Department of
Education (DepEd) which applies a flexible learning philosophy and a curricular delivery program that includes non-formal
and informal sources of knowledge and skills.
Reference:
The Teacher and the School Curriculum, Bilbao, Dayagbil, Corpuz 2020
SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER- SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER SLRC-ST. LOUIS REVIEW CENTER 17