Macalintal v. COMELEC
Macalintal v. COMELEC
Macalintal v. COMELEC
COMELEC
G.R. No. 157013 – July 10, 2003
J. Austria-Martinez
FACTS:
1. Petitioner assails RA 9189, entitled, "An Act Providing for A System of Overseas Absentee
Voting by Qualified Citizens of the Philippines Abroad, Appropriating Funds Therefor, and for
Other Purposes," as unconstitutional.
a. He argues that the law violates the mandate under Section 4, Article VII of the
Constitution which provides that Congress shall proclaim the winning candidates for
President and Vice-President.
b. He also challenges the validity of the Joint Congressional Oversight Committee because
it violates the independence of the COMELEC under Section 1, Article IX-A of the
Constitution.
ISSUES + HELD:
1. W/N Section 4, Article VII of the Constitution is violated – YES.
o Section 18 of RA 9189 provides that “the Commission is empowered to order the
proclamation of winning candidates despite the fact that the scheduled election has not
taken place in a particular country or countries, if the holding of elections therein has
been rendered impossible by events, factors and circumstances peculiar to such country
or countries, in which events, factors and circumstances are beyond the control or
influence of the Commission”
This appears to be repugnant to Section 4, Article VII of the Constitution as said
Section totally disregarded the authority given to Congress by the Constitution to
proclaim the winning candidates for the positions of president and vice-president.
o Congress could not have allowed the COMELEC to encroach “on the power of Congress
to canvass the votes for president and vice-president and the power to proclaim the
winners for the said positions.”
RULING: RA 9189’s provisions which violate the Constitution are struck down. Otherwise, the law is
constitutional and valid.