Scribd
Upload
16 views6 pages

Assignment - SDLC - Batch 04

Assignment - SDLC - Batch 04 (1)

Uploaded by

madushandias2002
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
16 views6 pages

Assignment - SDLC - Batch 04

Assignment - SDLC - Batch 04 (1)

Uploaded by

madushandias2002
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

Unit number 07: Software Development Life Cycle

Assignment Brief
Student Name/ID Number S.N. Madushan Dias / HIT B04 - 08

Unit Number and Title 07: Software Development Life Cycle


Academic Year 2024

Unit Tutor S.D.Ujitha Sudasingha

Assignment Title Final Assignment – Batch 04

Issue Date 2024

Submission Date Please refer to the given assessment plan

Submission Format

The final report needs to be shared as a word document. For the viva student needs to participate
with a softcopy of the report.

Unit Learning Outcomes (Assessed by This assessment)


LO1 Describe different software development lifecycles
LO2 Explain the importance of a feasibility study
LO3 Undertake a software development lifecycle
LO4 Discuss the suitability of software behavioral design techniques.

Transferable skills and competencies developed

Critical Analysis, Analytical Skills, Critical Writing

Vocational scenario

Imagine you are a technical project manager

Assignment activity and guidance


Sola Max is a natural electric power generating project which has been recently started by the
ministry of natural resources Srilanka. The main purpose of the project is to generate electric power
through natural solar energy and store for future use. This project is a huge scale electric project
since the project leaders has been decided to manage the sourcing, obtaining and paying for goods
and services through a Procurement Management System (PMS). In the context of a natural electric
power generating project, a Procurement Management System (PMS) plays a crucial role in
ensuring the efficient and effective acquisition of the necessary goods, services, and resources
required for the project's successful completion.

Below are the key features that needs to be implemented/satisfied with new PMS.

Purchase Requisitions: Allows users to create and submit requests for goods or services.
Supplier Management: Facilitates the onboarding, evaluation, and management of suppliers.
Purchase Orders: Automates the creation, approval, and tracking of purchase orders.
Inventory Management: Keeps track of inventory levels and helps in maintaining optimal stock.
Reporting and Analytics: Provides insights and reports on procurement activities, supplier
performance, and spending patterns.

For the entire project the time is not a constraint because it could use reasonable time and cover
with in two years. But the requirement is subjected to be changed, and it has a probability of
changing the requirement in future. You have the freedom to scale up the requirement. Create a
detailed report on applying software development lifecycle (SDLC) for given scenario. In the
report make sure to cover all the learning outcomes and below points.

1. Describe the SDLC model you have selected and why you have selected it.
2. Describe two iterative and two sequential software lifecycle models.
3. Explain the risk of the above projects and how it has managed in the selected SDLC.
4. Describe the merits of applying the waterfall lifecycle model to a large software
development project such as above project.
5. Design a feasibility report (in the same assignment report) explaining the purpose and the
components of feasibility report relevant to given scenario.
6. Do a detailed software investigation on above project requirement.
7. Design a data flow diagram (DFD) and sequence diagram to satisfy the above given
scenario (For one process is enough).
8. Explain how the quality of the software could be improved in above software.
9. Apply the steps of selected SDLC in above scenario.

**End of the assignment**


Recommended Resources
Please note that the resources listed are examples for you to use as a starting point in your
research – the list is not definitive.

Unit Learning Outcomes (Assessed by This Assessment)

Pass Merit Distinction

LO1 Describe different software development lifecycles

P1 Describe two iterative M1 Discuss using an D1 Assess the merits of


and two sequential example, why a particular applying the Waterfall
software lifecycle models. lifecycle model is selected lifecycle model to a large
P2 Explain how risk is for a development software development
managed in software environment. project.
lifecycle models.

LO2 Explain the importance of a feasibility study D2 Assess the impact of


different feasibility criteria
on a software investigation.
P3 Explain the purpose of a M2 Discuss the
feasibility report. Components of a feasibility
P4 Describe how technical report
solutions can be compared.

LO3 Undertake a software development lifecycle D3 Evaluate the process of


undertaking a systems
investigation with regard to
P5 Undertake a software M3 Analyse how software
its effectiveness in
investigation to meet a requirements can be improving a software
business need. traced throughout the quality.
P6 Use appropriate software lifecycle.
software analysis M4 Discuss two
tools/techniques to carry approaches to improving
out a software investigation software quality.
and create supporting
documentation.

LO4 Discuss the suitability of software behavioural D4 Present justifications of


how data-driven software
design techniques
can improve the reliability
and effectiveness of
P7 Discuss, using examples, M5 Analyse a range of software.
the suitability of software software behavioural tools
behavioural design and techniques.
techniques. M6 Differentiate between
a finite state machine
(FSM) and an extended
FSM, providing an
application of use for
both.
ASSESSMENT SUBMISSION AND DECLARATION
When submitting evidence for assessment, each student must sign a declaration confirming
that the work is their own.
Student name: Assessor name:

Issue date: Submission date: Submitted on:

Programme:

Unit:
Assignment number and title:

Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a particular form of cheating. Plagiarism must be avoided at all costs and
students who break the rules, however innocently, may be penalised. It is your responsibility
to ensure that you understand correct referencing practices. As a university level student, you
are expected to use appropriate references throughout and keep carefully detailed notes of all
your sources of materials for material you have used in your work, including any material
downloaded from the Internet. Please consult the relevant unit lecturer or your course tutor if
you need any further advice.

Student Declaration
I certify that the assignment submission is entirely my own work and I fully understand the
consequences of plagiarism. I understand that making a false declaration is a form of
malpractice.

Student signature: Madushan Dias Date:


Higher Nationals - Summative Assignment Feedback Form
Student Name/ID
Unit Title
Assignment Assessor
Number
Date Received
Submission Date 1st submission
Date Received 2nd
Re-submission Date submission
Assessor Feedback:

Grade: Assessor Signature: Date:


Resubmission Feedback:
*Please note resubmission feedback is focussed only on the resubmitted work

Grade: Assessor Signature: Date:


Internal Verifier’s Comments:

Signature & Date:

Please note that grade decisions are provisional. They are only confirmed once internal and external
moderation has taken place and grades decisions have been agreed at the assessment board.

You might also like