0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views10 pages

Supp Tables

APTA

Uploaded by

projas9300
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
16 views10 pages

Supp Tables

APTA

Uploaded by

projas9300
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 10

Supplementary Table 1.

Summary of studies included in the systematic review: Part I

Study ID Population

n Gender Age Etiology Injury phase


1st Author, Year Design
Total EG-1 EG-2 GC EG-1 EG-2 CG EG-1 EG-2 CG
Ada, 2013 RCT 68 34 34 34 (M:24, F:10) (M:28 ,F:6) (M:19, F:15) 70 64 63 Stroke Chronic
Aguiar, 2020 RCT 22 11 11 - (M:8, F:3) (M:8, F:3) - 52 48 - Stroke Chronic
Aidar, 2007 RCT 31 16 - 15 (M:10, F:6) - (M:9, F:4) 50 - 53 Stroke Chronic
Aidar, 2016 RCT 24 11 - 13 (M:6, F:5) - (M:9, F:4) 51 - 53 Stroke Chronic
Askim, 2018 RCT 380 186 - 194 (M:104, F:82) - (M:127, F:67) 72 - 72 Stroke Chronic
Chen, 2015 RCT 24 12 12 - (M:7, F:5) (M:6, F:6) - 64 67 - Stroke Subacute
Chu, 2004 RCT 12 7 5 - (M:6, F:1) (M:5) - 62 63 - Stroke Chronic
Curcio, 2020 RCT 20 10 - 10 (M:4, F:6) - (M:5, F:5) 37 - 43 TBI Chronic
Dean, 2018 RCT 45 23 - 22 (M:16, F:7) - (M:14, F:8) 70 - 71 Stroke Subacute, Chronic
Gjellesvik, 2021 RCT 70 36 - 34 (M:21, F:15) - (M:20, F:14) 58 - 59 Stroke Chronic
Gordon, 2013 RCT 188 64 - 64 (M:29, F:35) - (M:29, F:35) 63 - 65 Stroke Chronic
Han, 2017 RCT 20 10 10 - (M:4, F:6) (M:4, F:6) - 59 62 - Stroke Subacute
Holmgren, 2010 RCT 34 15 - 19 (M:9, F:6) - (M:12, F:7) 78 - 79 Stroke Subacute
Jin, 2012 RCT 193 68 65 - (M:48, F:20) (M:46, F:19) - 57 56 - Stroke Chronic
Kim, 2015 RCT 22 11 - 11 (M:7, F:4) - (M:6, F:5) 54 - 55 Stroke Chronic
Knox, 2018 RCT 96 51 45 48 (M:25, F:26) (M:25, F:20) (M:22, F:26) 51 51 48 Stroke Subacute
Lamberti, 2017 RCT 35 17 18 - (M:13, F:4) (M:14, F:4) - 67 69 - Stroke Chronic
Langhammer, 2014 RCT 37 19 18 - (M:-, F:-) (M:-, F:-) - 78 72 - Stroke Subacute, Chronic
Lorenz, 2017 SG 14 - - - (M:12, F:2) - - 45 - - ABI Chronic
Macko, 2005 RCT 59 32 - 29 (M:22, F:10) - (M:21, F:8) 63 - 64 Stroke Chronic
Marigold, 2005 RCT 48 22 26 - (M:17, F:5) (M:18, F:8) - 68 68 - Stroke Chronic
Martins, 2020 RCT 36 18 - 18 (M:8, F:10) - (M:8, F:10) 56 - 55 Stroke Chronic
Marzolini, 2018 RCT 68 33 35 - (M:22, F:11) (M:22, F:13) - 62 66 - Stroke Chronic
May, 2013 RCT 87 43 44 - (M:34, F:9) (M:26, F:18) - 68 68 - Stroke Subacute
Meester, 2018 RCT 50 26 24 - (M:15, F:11) (M:11, F:13) - 61 62 - Stroke Chronic
Moore, 2015 RCT 40 20 20 - (M:18, F:2) (M:16, F:4) - 68 70 - Stroke Chronic
Munari, 2018 RCT 15 8 7 - (M:7, F:1) (M:7) - 61 62 - Stroke Chronic
Nave, 2019 RCT 20 105 - 95 (M:60, F:45) - (M:59, F:36) 69 - 70 Stroke Subacute
Pérez-de la Cruz, 2020 RCT 28 13 13 15 (M:8, F:5) (M:7, F:6) (M:7, F:8) 61 64 63 Stroke Chronic
Pérez-Rodríguez, 2021 CT 62 34 - 28 (M:22, F:12) - (M:13, F:15) 50 - 52 ABI Subacute, Chronic
Qurat, 2018 RCT 30 15 15 - (M:16, F:14) - 52 54 - Stroke Subacute, Chronic
Reynolds, 2021 RCT 20 10 10 - (M:10) (M:8, F:2) - 55 60 - Stroke Chronic
Soh, 2020 RCT 36 18 - 18 (M:13, F:5) - (M:12, F:6) 56 - 57 Stroke Chronic
Stuart, 2009 RCT 78 40 - 38 (M:25, F:15) - (M:29, F:9) 67 - 70 Stroke Chronic
Taricco, 2014 RCT 229 126 - 103 (M:85, F:41) - (M:62, F:41) 72 70 Stroke Subacute
Vahlberg, 2017 RCT 67 34 - 33 (M:27, F:7) - (M:24, F:9) 73 - 74 Stroke Chronic
Wise, 2012 SG 40 40 - - (M:15, F:25) - - 40 - - TBI Chronic
Yeh, 2019 RCT 30 15 15 - (M:8, F:7) (M:13, F:2) - 51 60 - Stroke Chronic
Abbreviations: n, Sample; GC, Control Group; EG, Experimental Group; RCT, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial; CT, Non-randomized Controlled Clinical Trial; SG, Single
Group; M, Male; F, Female; TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury ; ABI, Acquired Brain Injury
Supplementary Table 2. Summary of studies included in the systematic review: Part II
Intervention

Exercise Duration Frequency Time


1st Author, Year CG
EG-1 EG-2 (weeks) (sessions/week) (minutes/session)

Ada, 2013 Aerobic Aerobic 16 3 30 Usual treatment


Aguiar, 2020 Aerobic Aerobic 12 1 40 -
Aidar, 2007 Multicomponent - 12 2 45-60 Usual treatment
Aidar, 2016 Strength - 12 3 45-60 Usual treatment
Askim, 2018 Multicomponent - 72 3 45-60 Usual treatment
Chen, 2015 Multicomponent Multicomponent 4 5 5x3 -
Chu, 2004 Multicomponent Multicomponent 8 3 60 -
Curcio, 2020 Multicomponent - 4 3 45 Usual treatment
Dean, 2018 Multicomponent - 24 2 120 Usual treatment
Gjellesvik, 2021 Aerobic - 8 3 30 Usual treatment
Gordon, 2013 Aerobic - 12 3 30 Usual treatment
Han, 2017 Multicomponent Aerobic 6 5 30 -
Holmgren, 2010 Multicomponent - 5 6 45 Usual treatment
Jin, 2012 Aerobic Aerobic 8 5 - -
Kim, 2015 Multicomponent - 6 2 60 Usual treatment
Usual treatment and educational
Knox, 2018 Multicomponent Strength 12 1 60
sessions
Lamberti, 2017 Multicomponent Multicomponent 8 3 60 -
Langhammer, 2014 Multicomponent Multicomponent 48 2 45-60 -
Lorenz, 2017 Multicomponent - 6 4 60-90 -
Macko, 2005 Aerobic Multicomponent 24 3 40 -
Marigold, 2005 Multicomponent Multicomponent 10 3 60 -
Usual treatment and educational
Martins, 2020 Multicomponent - 12 1 60
sessions
Marzolini, 2018 Multicomponent Aerobic 24 5 - -
May, 2013 Multicomponent Multicomponent 12 7 30 -
Meester, 2018 Aerobic Aerobic 10 2 30 -
Moore, 2015 Multicomponent Stretching 19 3 45-60 -
Munari, 2018 Aerobic Aerobic 12 3 50-60 -
Regular treatment and relaxation
Nave, 2019 Aerobic - 4 5 50
sessions
Pérez de la Cruz, 2020 Multicomponent Multicomponent 12 2 60 Usual treatment
Pérez-Rodríguez, 2020 Multicomponent - 18 2 30 Usual treatment
Qurat, 2018 Aerobic Aerobic 6 3 45 -
Reynolds, 2021 Aerobic Aerobic 12 2 30 -
Soh, 2020 Multicomponent - 12 3 30 Usual treatment
Stuart, 2009 Multicomponent - 24 3 60 Usual treatment
Taricco, 2014 Multicomponent - 8 2 60 Usual treatment
Valhberg, 2017 Multicomponent - 12 2 75 Usual treatment
Wise, 2012 Aerobic - 10 1 60 -
Yeh, 2019 Multicomponent Multicomponent 12 1 60 -
Abbreviations: n, Sample; GC, Control Group; EG, Experimental Group; RCT, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial; CT, Non-randomized Controlled Clinical Trial; SG, Single
Group; M, Male; F, Female; TBI, Traumatic Brain Injury ; ABI, Acquired Brain Injury
Supplementary Table 3. Quality of Evidence
n Participants Mean difference
Variable Risk of bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Other considerations Certainty of evidence
(n Studies) (95% IC)
554 ⨁⨁◯◯ 2.35
SF-36 (PCS) Very serious c Serious b Not serious Not serious Strong association
(8) (Low) (1.01 – 3.70)
554 ⨁⨁◯◯ 1.80
SF-36 (MCS) Very serious c Serious c Not serious Not serious Strong association
(8) (Low) (0.63 – 2.98)
All plausible residual
1119 confounding would ⨁⨁⨁⨁ 27.5
6MWT Not serious Not serious Not serious Serious a
(9) reduce the (High) (8.52 – 46.49)
demonstrated effect
All plausible residual
485 confounding would ⨁⨁⨁⨁ 0.12
10MWT Not serious Not serious Not serious Not serious
(5) reduce the (High) (0.08 – 0.16)
demonstrated effect
328 0.16
TUG Not serious Not serious Not serious Serious a None ⨁⨁⨁◯ (Moderate)
(4) (0.06 – 0.38)
All plausible residual
544 confounding would ⨁◯◯◯ 1.24
BBS Not serious Very serious b Not serious Very serious a
(5) reduce the (Very low) (4.06 – 6.54)
demonstrated effect
a. Large CI; b. High heterogeneity; c. Most information from studies at high risk of bias; d. Moderate heterogeneity
Abbreviations: n, number; CI, Confident Interval; SF-36, 36-item Short Form Health Survey; PCS, Physical Component Score; MCS, Mental Component Score; 6MWT, Six Minutes
Walk Test; 10MWT, Ten Meter Walk Test; TUG, Timed Up and Go test; BBS, Berg Balance Scale.
Supplementary Table 4. Exercise effects on functional capacity and balance: subgroup’s analysis
Between-group
n n Random IV,95% CI a Heterogeneity
Z (p) differences
Groups Participants [Lower; Upper]
2
p I χ2 (p)
Functional Capacity: Walking Endurance (6MWT)
Injury phase
Subacute 8 419 47.17 [20.65; 73.69] 3.49 (<0.001) 0.010 61%
0.15 (0.700)
Chronic 20 573 40.59 [19.79; 61.39] 3.83 (<0.001) <0.001 72%
Type of component
Aerobic 16 555 48.39 [21.54; 75.24] 3.53 (<0.001) <0.001 79%
Strength 1 45 75.00 [27.49; 122.51] 3,09 (0.002) N/A N/A
3,61 (0.310)
Multicomponent 11 408 31.96 [16.05; 47.87] 3.94 (<0.001) 0,230 23%
Stretching 1 20 22.00 [-56.40; 100.40] 0.55 (0.580) N/A N/A
Program Frequency (Sessions/Week)
1 6 151 50.16 [21.93; 78.39] 3.48 (<0.001) 0,110 45%
2 2 160 26.70 [6.31; 47.08] 2.34 (0.020) 0,710 0%
5.80 (0.120)
3 14 339 57.56 [27.51; 87.62] 3.75 (<0.001) 0,001 62%
>3 7 378 20.06 [-1.79; 41.91] 1.80 (0.070) 0,020 62%
Functional Capacity: Walking Speed (10MWT)
Injury phase
Subacute 2 96 0.28 [0.17; 0.40] 4.80 (<0.001) 0.450 0%
11.57 (<0.001)
Chronic 17 342 0.07 [0.02; 0.11] 2.74 (0.005) 0.800 0%
Type of component
Aerobic 10 193 0.06 [-0.01; 0.14] 1.57 (0.120) 0.870 0%
Strength 1 45 0.24 [0.08; 0.40] 2.95 (0.003) - -
5.06 (0.170)
Multicomponent 7 180 0.17 [0.04; 0.29] 2.26 (0.008) 0.010 63%
Stretching 1 20 0.10 [-0.09; 0.29] 1.05 (0.290) - -
Program Frequency (Sessions/Week)
1 4 118 0.17 [-0.00; 0.34] 1.95 (0.050) 0.060 60%
2 4 65 0.10 [-0.02; 0.23] 1.59 (0.110) 1.000 0% 1.93 (0.500)
3 11 255 0.07 [0.02; 0.12] 2.52 (0.010) 0.440 0%
Mobility (TUG)
Injury phase
Subacute 8 250 -5.21 [-9.28; -1.14] 2.51 (0.002) 0.020 58%
0.79 (0.370)
Chronic 7 104 -3.15 [-5.13; -1.17] 3.11 (0.002) 0.330 13%
Type of component
Aerobic 5 81 -2.34 [-5.19; 0.52] 1.61 (0.110) 0.050 58%
Strength 1 45 -7.30 [-15.08; 0.48] 1.84 (0.070) - - 2.16 (0.340)
Multicomponent 9 228 -4.49 [-6.71; -2.28] 3.97 (<0.001) 0.470 0%
Program Frequency (Sessions/Week)
1 2 96 -9.60 [-15.68; -3.52] 3.09 (0.002) 0.350 0%
18.15 (<0.001)
2 5 131 -3.60 [-6.42; -0.79] 2.51 (0.010) 0.690 0%
3 5 99 -0.76 [-2.23; 0.70] 1.02 (0.310) 0.840 0%
>3 4 54 -7.20 [-10.69; -3.71] 4.04 (<0.001) 0.570 0%
Balance (BBS)
Injury phase
Subacute 7 365 1.40 [-1.22; 4.03] 2.35 (0.020) <0.001 82%
0.03 (0.860)
Chronic 16 428 3.78 [1.92; 5.64] 3.99 (<0.001) <0.001 94%
Type of component
Aerobic 4 163 6.03 [1.47; 10.59] 2.59 (0.010) <0.001 95%
Strength 1 45 6.00 [2.28; 9.72] 3.16 (0.002) - -
3.54 (0.310)
Multicomponent 16 527 3.54 [2.20; 4.88] 5.18 (<0.001) <0.001 72,5%
Stretching 1 20 2.00 [-1.29; 5.29] 1.19 (0.230) - -
Program Frequency (Sessions/Week)
1 2 96 7.47 [4.53; 10.41] 4.98 (<0.001) 0.270 18%
2 4 231 3.60 [1.15; 6.04] 2,88 (0.004) 0.260 25%
5.16 (0.160)
3 10 193 4.20 [3.17; 5.23] 8.00 (<0.001) 0.070 43%
>3 6 235 3.36 [0.24; 6.48] 2.11 (0.030) <0.001 93%
a
Inverse variance random effects method
Abbreviations: 6MWT, Six Minutes Walk test; 10MWT, Ten Meter Walk Test; TUG, Timed Up and Go test; BBS, Berg
Balance Scale.
Supplementary Table 5. Exercise effects on quality of life: subgroup’s analysis
Between-group
n n Random IV,95% CI a Heterogeneity
Z (p) differences
Groups Participants [Lower; Upper]
2
p I χ2 (p)
Health-Related Quality of Life: SF 36 (PCS)
Injury phase
Subacute 5 188 3.28 [1.57; 5.00] 3.75 (<0.001) 0.530 0%
5.50 (0.020)
Chronic 13 236 5.79 [4.59; 6.99] 9.48 (<0.001) 0.090 20%
Type of component
Aerobic 9 175 6.20 [4.57; 7.83] 7.45 (<0.001) 0.200 28%
3.60 (0.060)
Multicomponent 9 249 4.19 [2.91; 5.47] 6.41 (<0.001) 0.390 5%
Program Frequency (Sessions/Week)
2 6 195 4.29 [2.73; 5.84] 5.41 (<0.001) 0.270 22%
3 9 190 5.87 [4,08; 7.65] 6.44 (<0.001) 0.100 41% 2.05 (0.360)
>3 3 39 3.36 [-1.89; 8.62] 1.25 (0,210) 0.640 0%
Health-Related Quality of Life: SF 36 (MCS)
Injury phase
Subacute 5 188 3.28 [1.25; 5.31] 3.17 (0,002) 0.430 0%
0.62 (0.430)
Chronic 11 186 2.32 [1.03; 3.61] 4.45 (<0.001) 0.250 21%
Type of component
Aerobic 6 115 5.02 [2.56; 7.48] 4.00 (<0.001) 0.530 0%
5.94 (0.010)
Multicomponent 10 259 1.81 [1.03; 2.60] 4.52 (<0.001) 0.540 0%
Program Frequency (Sessions/Week)
2 6 195 2.07 [0.57; 3.56] 2.71 (0,007) 0.110 44%
3 7 140 4.14 [1.94; 6.34] 3.69 (<0.001) 0.570 0% 2.36 (0.310)
>3 3 39 2.32 [-3.11; 7.75] 0.84 (0.400) 0.830 0%
a
Inverse variance random effects method
Abbreviations: n, Sample; CI, Confident Interval; SF-36, 36-item Short Form Health Survey; PCS, Physical Component
Score; MCS, Mental Component Score
Supplementary Table 6. Exercise effects on functional capacity and balance: meta-regression analysis
Intercept Covariates Heterogeneity
df Effect Effect R²
Z p Z p I² p
[Lower; Upper] [Lower; Upper]
Functional capacity: 6MWT
Age 28 40.61 [-103.21; 184.43] 0.55 0.580 -0.00 [-2.32; 2.31] -0.00 0.997 73.45% <0.001 0%
Program duration 29 15.24 [-22.29; 52.77] 0.80 0.426 1.90 [-0.80; 4.59] 1.38 0.168 69.98% <0.001 9%
Number of sessions 29 39.05 [13.08; 65.03] 2.95 0.003 0.01 [-0.50; 0.53] 0.05 0.960 72.83% <0.001 0%
Time per session 25 46.98 [-16.47; 110.42] 1.45 0.147 -0.06 [-1.32; 1.21] -0.09 0.931 69.29% <0.001 0%
Functional capacity: 10MWT
Age 17 0.22 [-0.28; 0.73] 0.87 0.384 -0.00 [-0.01; 0.01] -0.33 0.742 24.87% 0.456 0%
Program duration 18 0.27 [0.11; 0.43] 3.36 <0.001 -0.01 [-0.02; -0.00] -2.10 0.035 12.56% 0.570 72%
Number of sessions 18 0.22 [0.12; 0.33] 4.24 <0.001 -0.00 [-0.00; 0.00] -2.46 0.014 6.71% 0.596 86%
Time per session 18 -0.05 [-0.26; 0.16] -0.47 0.641 0.00 [-0.00; 0.01] 1.67 0.096 28.08% 0.432 29%
Functional capacity / Mobility: TUG
Age 14 -13.78 [-31.59; 4.03] -1.52 0.129 0.17 [-0.13; 0.46] 1.11 0.266 45.36% 0.033 0%
Program duration 14 -4.16 [-7.19; -1.13] -2.69 0.007 0.04 [-0.16; 0.24] 0.37 0.709 46.17% 0.026 0%
Number of sessions 14 -5.14 [-8.73; -1.55] -2.81 0.005 0.05 [-0.05; 0.15] 0.94 0.346 44.22% 0.033 0%
Time per session 12 .14 [-6.95; 7.22] 0.04 0.970 -0.06 [-0.19; 0.07] -0.96 0.336 31.88% 0.124 16%
Balance: BBS
Age 20 18.90 [4.32; 33.47] 2.54 0.011 -0.24 [-0.46; -0.01] -2.03 0.043 87.61% <0.001 17%
Program duration 20 3.43 [0.30; 6.57] 2.15 0.032 0.04 [-0.16; 0.24] 0.43 0.664 90.33% <0.001 0%
Number of sessions 20 6.03 [2.78; 9.27] 3.64 <0.001 -0.05 [-0.12; 0.02] -1.48 0.140 88.73% <0.001 12%
Time per session 18 3.41 [-5.64; 12.46] 0.74 0.460 0.02 [-0.14; 0.18] 0.23 0.822 86.75% <0.001 0%
Abbreviations: gl, Degrees of Freedom; 6MWT, Six Minutes Walk test; 10MWT, Ten Meter Walk Test; TUG, Timed Up and Go test;
BBS, Berg Balance Scale.
Supplementary Table 7. Exercise effects on quality of life: meta-regression analysis
Intercept Covariates Heterogeneity
df Effect Effect R²
Z p Z p I² p
[Lower; Upper] [Lower; Upper]
Health-Related Quality of Life: SF-36 (PCS)
Age 17 17.24 [5.13; 29.36] 2.79 0.005 -0.18 [-0.37; 0.00] -1.94 0.053 0.00% 0.166 100%
Program duration 17 3.71 [0.17; 7.24] 2.06 0.040 0.10 [-0.14; 0.34] 0.79 0.431 33.71% 0.103 0%
Number of sessions 17 3.05 [0.13; 5.97] 2.05 0.040 0.06 [-0.02; 0.13] 1.48 0.138 26.26% 0.163 14%
Time per session 15 8.96 [6.01; 11.92] 5.94 <0.001 -0.07 [-0.12; -0.02] -2.66 0.008 13.87% 0.240 73%
Health-Related Quality of Life: SF-36 (MCS)
Age 15 -12.28 [-26.82; 2,27] -1.66 0.098 0.22 [-0.00; 0.45] 1.94 0.052 0.00% 0.444 100%
Program duration 15 3.36 [-0.69; 7.40] 1.63 0.104 -0.05 [-0.36; 0.26] -0.32 0.750 39.25% 0.233 0%
Number of sessions 15 1.76 [-2.31; 5.84] 0.85 0.396 0.03 [-0.10; 0.16] 0.51 0.614 39.22% 0.244 0%
Time per session 13 4.98 [1.44; 8.51] 2.76 0.006 -0.04 [-0.11; 0.02] -1.38 0.169 44.40% 0.173 0%
Abbreviations: df, Degrees of Freedom; SF-36, 36-item Short Form Health Survey; PCS, Physical Component Score; MCS,
Mental Component Score.

You might also like