Clasps 24
Clasps 24
MEDICINE
Dental Medicine Program
Lecture :(Clasps in partial denture)
Dr :(yousra )
1- Occlusal1y Approaching 2- GINGIVALLY
clasps APPROACHING CLASP
I- OCCLUSALLYAPPROACHING
(CIRCUMFERENTIAL) CLASPS
1-Aker’s clasp (Aker family)
Retentive arm
0.01 of an inch
Occlusal
rest
Advantages
▪ Provides support, retention, and the best bracing.
▪ Not distorted easily.
▪ Easily constructed.
▪ Simple to repair.
Disadvantages
▪ More tooth surface is covered.
▪ Changes the morphology of the abutment crown.
▪ Due to its half round cross-section, the Aker clasp can be
adjusted to the tooth surface in an inward or outward
(Bucco-lingual) and not upward or downward (occluso-
gingival) direction.
▪ Cannot be used in free-end saddle cases due to its rigidity,
except with a stress equalizing design or reversed.
TYPES
OF OCCLUALLY
APPROACING CLASPS
1- Double aker
(Embrassure, butterfly, compound clasp)
Indications
• In distal extension RPDs presented with shallow
vestibule or severe tissue undercut were Gingivally
approaching clasp is contraindicated.
Advantages
1. Mesio-occlusal rest, permitting the other components
to release from the tooth and drop into undercuts
when occlusal loads are placed on the denture base.
2. This in turn prevents tipping of the abutment.
3. Absence of a lingual rigid reciprocal arm minimizes
rotational forces falling on the abutment.
3-RING CLASP
Indication:
It can be used in distal extension cases
when the bar clasp is contraindicated
5- EXTENDED ARM CLASP
When abutment tooth has insufficient undercut
Indications
Used when the undercut on the
tooth near the edentulous area
is poor, while undercut on the
adjacent tooth is suitable.
6- Back action clasp
Single arm clasp
Minor connector starts
mesio-lingually
It engages mesio-buccal
undercut.
Some times an additional
rest could be employed on
the mesial side to improve
support
Used in free end saddle.
Used for maxillary molars
and premolars as the teeth
have the tendency to
incline buccally
Engage a mesiobuccal undercut
of 0.01 of an inch.
Disadvantages
• Excessive tooth coverage.
• Easily distorted
• Excessive display of metal,
• The occlusal rest is supported by the clasp arm and not by a rigid
minor connector, hence the rest cannot function adequately.
• Poor bracing and reciprocation.
• Food trap
7- Reverse back action clasp
Minor C.
originating Retentive arm
Mesio-
buccally
engage
Mesio-lingual
undercut
Contraindications
• Shallow vestibule.
• Severe tissue or tooth undercut to avoid food or
tissue trap.
• Root exposure
• High frenum attachment
• High survey line
RECESSION
Soft tissue
undercut
High frenal attachment
2- THE I-BAR CLASP (ROACH CLASP ARM):
T clasp
I clasp
THE I AND Y RETENTIVE CLASP ARMS PROVIDE
TRIPPING ACTION ??
Y I bar
THE T AND MODIFIED T CLASPS DID NOT HAVE
TRIPPING ACTION…..WHY??
T modified T
THE T AND MODIFIED T CLASPS DID NOT HAVE TRIPPING
ACTION, SINCE THE RETENTIVE TERMINAL ACTUALLY
ENGAGE THE UNDERCUT FROM AN OCCLUSAL
DIRECTION.
CRITERIA FOR CLASP SELECTION
• The selection of the clasp depends
mainly on
- Type of support
- Undercut areas
- Esthetics.
1- For bounded saddle
• The retentive undercut present is
used with any acceptable clasp type
(clasping for convenience).
2- For distal extension base
Stress releasing clasp that distribute
the force between the abutment and
the ridge is used:
A- IF A MESIOBUCCAL UNDERCUT IS AVAILABLE
- I Bar clasp,
- Reverse Aker (the minor connector
and the occlusal rests are placed
mesially)
- C-clasp .
Clasps with splinting action