RPMS PPST
RPMS PPST
RPMS PPST
Role of teachers
Teachers play a crucial role in nation building. Through quality teachers, the Philippines can develop
holistic learners who are steeped in values, equipped with 21st century skills, and able to propel the
country to development and progress. This is in consonance with the Department of Education
vision of producing: “Filipinos who passionately love their country and whose values and
competencies enable them to realize their full potential and contribute meaningfully to building the
nation” (DepED Order No. 36, s. 2013).
Evidences show unequivocally that good teachers are vital to raising student achievement, i.e.,
quality learning is contingent upon quality teaching. Hence, enhancing teacher quality becomes of
utmost importance for long-term and sustainable nation building.
The changes brought about by various national and global frameworks such as the K to 12 Reform
and the ASEAN integration, globalization, and the changing character of the 21st century learners
necessitate improvement and adaptability of education, and a call for the rethinking of the current
teacher standards.
The Philippine Government has consistently pursued teacher quality reforms through a number of
initiatives. As a framework of teacher quality, the National Competency-Based Teacher Standards
(NCBTS) was institutionalized through CHED Memorandum Order No. 52, s. 2007 and DepED Order
No. 32, s. 2009. It emerged as part of the implementation of the Basic Education Sector Reform
Agenda (BESRA), and was facilitated by drawing on the learning considerations of programs, such as
the Basic Education Assistance for Mindanao (BEAM), the Strengthening Implementation of Visayas
Education (STRIVE) project and the Third Elementary Education Project (TEEP).
The K to 12 Reform (R.A. 10533) in 2013 has changed the landscape of teacher quality requirements
in the Philippines. The reform process warrants an equivalent supportive focus on teacher quality –
high quality teachers who are properly equipped and prepared to assume the roles and functions of
a K to 12 teacher.
The Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers, which is built on NCBTS, complements the
reform initiatives on teacher quality from pre-service education to in-service training. It articulates
what constitutes teacher quality in the K to 12 Reform through well-defined domains, strands, and
indicators that provide measures of professional learning, competent practice, and effective
engagement. This set of standards makes explicit what teachers should know, be able to do and
value to achieve competence, improved student learning outcomes, and eventually quality
education. It is founded on teaching philosophies of learner-centeredness, lifelong learning, and
inclusivity/inclusiveness, among others. The professional standards, therefore, become a public
statement of professional accountability that can help teachers reflect on and assess their own
practices as they aspire for personal growth and professional development.
The Philippine Professional Standards for Teachers defines teacher quality in the Philippines. The
standards describe the expectations of teachers’ increasing levels of knowledge, practice and
professional engagement. At the same time, the standards allow for teachers’ growing
understanding, applied with increasing sophistication across a broader and more complex range of
teaching/learning situations.
The following describes the breadth of 7 Domains that are required by teachers to be effective in the
21st Century in the Philippines. Quality teachers in the Philippines need to possess the following
characteristics:
The 7 Domains collectively comprise 37 strands that refer to more specific dimensions of teacher
practices.
1. Content knowledge and its application within and across curriculum areas
5. Strategies for developing critical and creative thinking, as well as other higher-order thinking
skills
5. Use of assessment data to enhance teaching and learning practices and programs
2. Engagement of parents and the wider school community in the educative process
3. Professional ethics
1. Philosophy of teaching
Career stages
Career Stage 1 or Beginning Teachers have gained the qualifications recognized for entry into the
teaching profession. They have a strong understanding of the subjects/areas in which they are
trained in terms of content knowledge and pedagogy. They possess the requisite knowledge, skills
and values that support the teaching and learning process. They manage learning programs and
have strategies that promote learning based on the learning needs of their students. They seek
advice from experienced colleagues to consolidate their teaching practice.
Career Stage 2 or Proficient Teachers are professionally independent in the application of skills vital
to the teaching and learning process. They provide focused teaching programs that meet curriculum
and assessment requirements. They display skills in planning, implementing, and managing learning
programs. They actively engage in collaborative learning with the professional community and other
stakeholders for mutual growth and advancement. They are reflective practitioners who continually
consolidate the knowledge, skills and practices of Career Stage 1 teachers.
Career Stage 3 or Highly Proficient Teachers consistently display a high level of performance in their
teaching practice. They manifest an in-depth and sophisticated understanding of the teaching and
learning process. They have high education-focused situation cognition, are more adept in problem
solving and optimize opportunities gained from experience. Career Stage 3 Teachers work
collaboratively with colleagues and provide them support and mentoring to enhance their learning
and practice. They continually seek to develop their professional knowledge and practice by
reflecting on their own needs, and those of their colleagues and students.
Career Stage 4 or Distinguished Teachers embody the highest standard for teaching grounded in
global best practices. They exhibit exceptional capacity to improve their own teaching practice and
that of others. They are recognized as leaders in education, contributors to the profession and
initiators of collaborations and partnerships. They create lifelong impact in the lives of colleagues,
students and others. They consistently seek professional advancement and relevance in pursuit of
teaching quality and excellence. They exhibit commitment to inspire the education community and
stakeholders for the improvement of education provision in the Philippines.
The performance cycle of teachers follows the DepEd RPMS Cycle prescribed in Deped Order (DO)
No. 2, s. 2015 (Guidelines on the Establishment and Implementation of the Results-Based
Performance Management System (RPMS)in the Department of Education). Figure 1 illustrates the
four (4) phases of the RPMS Cycle and its alignment with the RPMS-related activities of teachers
within a School Year (SY).
• Teachers 1-III who will use the Proficient Tools are expected to be professionally
independent in the application of skills vital to the teaching and learning process.
• Master Teachers who will use the Highly Proficient Tools are those that consistently display
high levels of performance in their teaching practice. They manifest an in-depth and
sophisticated understanding of the teaching and learning process, have high education-
focused situation cognition, and are more adept in problem solving and optimize
opportunities gained from experience.
• The 37 PPST indicators for both Proficient and Highly Proficient Tools shall be divided across
three (3) school years, each with a total of 15 indicators composed of Classroom
Observable Indicators {COIs}, Non-Classroom Observable Indicators {NCOIs}, and the Plus
Factor.
THE WEIGHT PER EACH INDICATOR SHALL BE AS FOLLOWS:
Total 100%
All COIs shall be measured using the following Performance Indicators: Quality and Efficiency.
Quality shall be measured through the demonstration of COIs during the Classroom
Observation (CO) and the submission of the Classroom Observation Tool (COT) or Inter-Observer
Agreement Form, whichever is applicable, as means of verification (MOV).
Efficiency shall be measured through efficient delivery of the lesson objectives within the
prescribed period or time allotment.
On the other hand, NCOIs shall be measured using the following Performance Indicators:
Quality, Efficiency, and/or Timeliness.
For SY 2022-2023, only two (2) classroom observations are required, which shall be conducted in the
last two (2) quarters (one per quarter).
For SY 2023-2024 and SY 2024-2025, four (4) classroom observations are required, which shall be
conducted once every quarter.
RPMS TOOL for Teachers I-III
RPMS TOOL for Teachers I-III SUMMARY
References: