0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views20 pages

Galect

Uploaded by

addis alem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views20 pages

Galect

Uploaded by

addis alem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

An

An Introduction
Introduction to
to Genetic
Genetic Algorithms
Algorithms

Rajkumar Pant
Aerospace Engineering Department
IIT Bombay

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


OUTLINE
OUTLINE

( Historical background
( Working Principles of GA
( GA operators
( Concept of schemata in GA
( GA v/s traditional methods
( Drawbacks of GA
( GA for constrained optimization
( Modern developments

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


OPTIMIZATION
OPTIMIZATION TECHNIQUES
TECHNIQUES
x = xi, i = 1, n ‘n’ Design Variables
f(x) Objective function
Ui ≤ xi ≤ Li, i = 1,n Bounds on Design Variables
gk(x) ≤ 0, k = 1,m ‘m’ inequality Constraints
hj(x) = 0, j = 1,p ‘p’ equality Constraints

Trivial Solution Exhaustive Search

Initial Point >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trial Point

Deterministic Methods Direct mathematical link


Stochastic Methods Element of randomness

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Historical Background
(Mechanics of natural genetics and evolution
u Survival of the fittest
u Evolution of the species

(John Holland, University of Michigan


s Adaptation in natural and artificial systems, 1975

(David Goldberg, University of Illinois


s Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization and Machine
Learning,1989

(ICGA, 1985, 87, 89, …….

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Working Principles of GA
(Unconstrained Optimization
u Maximize f(x), x = xi, i = 1, n, Ui ≤ xi ≤ Li, i = 1,n

(Coding of x in string structures


x
u Not absolutely essential (Real GA)
u Usually Binary Coding
s each xi coded in k sub-strings of length li, k = 2 {li}
s sub-string element sk(m) ∈(0,1), m = 0, li-1
• sk = sl-1sl-2 ….. s2s1s0
s Discrete values of xi mapped
• xi = Li , DV(si) * (Ui - Li) / (2{li} - 1), where
DV(sk) = Decoded value of (sk) = ∑ 2m.sk(m), m = 0, l-1

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Example of Binary Coding
u Decoding Procedure k sk DECODING OF sk x1(k)
s i=1, l1 = 4 1 0000 (0)*23 + (0)22 + (0)*21 + (0)*20 0
3 2 1 0
2 0001 (0)*2 + (0)2 + (0)*2 + (1)*2 1
3 2 1 0
3 0010 (0)*2 + (0)2 + (1)*2 + (0)*2 2
s k = total number of discrete
4 0011 (0)*23 + (0)22 + (1)*21 + (1)*20 3
values of x1 =2 {l1} = 24 =16 5 0100 3 2 1
(0)*2 + (1)2 + (0)*2 + (0)*2 0
4
3 2 1 0
6 0101 (0)*2 + (1)2 + (0)*2 + (1)*2 5
3 2 1 0
s string sk = s3s2s1s0 7 0110 (0)*2 + (1)2 + (1)*2 + (0)*2 6
3 2 1 0
8 0111 (0)*2 + (1)2 + (1)*2 + (1)*2 7
s sk(m) ∈(0,1), m =0, 3
9 1000 (1)*23 + (0)22 + (0)*21 + (0)*20 8
10 1001 (1)*23 + (0)22 + (0)*21 + (1)*20 9
3 2 1 0
11 1010 (1)*2 + (0)2 + (1)*2 + (0)*2 10
m.
s DV (sk) =∑ 2 sk(m), m = 0, 3 12 3 2 1 0
1011 (1)*2 + (0)2 + (1)*2 + (1)*2 11
3 2 1 0
13 1100 (1)*2 + (1)2 + (0)*2 + (0)*2 12
3 2 1 0
14 1101 (1)*2 + (1)2 + (0)*2 + (1)*2 13
u Accuracy
15 1110 (1)*23 + (1)22 + (1)*21 + (0)*20 14
s ≈ (Ui - Li) / 2 {li} 3 2 1 0
16 1111 (1)*2 + (1)2 + (1)*2 + (1)*2 15
s Exponential increase with
string length
PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com
Working Principles of GA

(Fitness Function F(x)


u Directly related to f(x)
s F(x) = f(x) for maximization
s F(x) = 1/ (1, f(x)) for minimization
(Steps in GA
u Create initial population (randomly) by concantening sub-strings
u Evaluate F(x) of each member, identify best member(s)
u Create next generation, using GA operations
s Reproduction
s Crossover
s Mutation
u Iterate till convergence

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Reproduction
(Insertion of strings with higher F(x) in mating pool
u Strings with low F(x) may also get selected

(Selection strategies
u Proportionate
s probability of selection proportional to F(x)
• Roulette-Wheel selection

u Ranking
s best of a few strings selected each time
• Tournament selection

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Crossover
u Two strings from mating pool selected (randomly)
u Location(s) of crossover location determined (randomly )
u Bits of Strings interchanged between crossover location(s)

(Single point Crossover


(0) 0 0 0 0 =====> 0 0 0 1 (1)
(11) 1 0 1 1 =====> 1 0 1 0 (10)
Parent Strings Child Strings

(Crossover can be beneficial or detrimental


u Crossover Probability pc ≈ 0.7 to 0.9

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Mutation
(Flipping of bits of strings at random
u local search around current solution
u maintain genetic diversity of population
u enable search to climb towards global optimum
u mutation probability pm ≈ 0.005 to 0.015

(Illustration with pm = 0.10


u Original population
0010,1001,0001,1111,0111,1101,1111,1001
(2) (9) (1) (16) (7) (13) (16) (9)
u After Mutation

0 0 1 0 , 1 0 0 1 , 0 1 0 1 , 1 1 1 1 , 0 1 1 0 , 1 1 0 1, 1 1 1 1 , 1 1 0 1
(2) (9) (5) (16) (6) (13) (16) (13)

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


GA Operators - Summary

(Reproduction
u Select good strings from population (eliminate bad strings)

(Crossover
u Recombine strings and (hopefully) create better strings

(Mutation
u Once in a while, create even better/worse strings

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Concept of Schemata in GA
(Schemata
s number of strings with similarities at certain string positions
s total schemata for binary representation = 3l, l = string length
s defining length δ(H) = difference in outermost defining points
s order o(H) = number of fixed point
s Example for H = 1*0*
• δ(H)= o(H) =2
• strings = 1101, 1100, 1000, 1001
• occupies 25% of search space
0000 0001 0010 0011
0100 0101 0110 0111
1000 1001 1010 1011
1100 1101 1110 1111
s population = 16, but total schemata = 34 = 81

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Schemata Theorem

F (H )  δ (H ) 
m( H , t + 1) ≥ m( H , t ) 1 − pc − pmo( H )
Favg  l −1 
Where,
m(H,t) = Number of strings of schema H in generation t
F(H) = Average fitness of strings of schema H
Favg = Average fitness of the population
pc = Probability of crossover
pm = Probability of mutation
l = String length
δ (H) = Defining length of schema H
o(H) = Order of schema H

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Building Block Hypothesis

u Building Blocks
s Schema with lowδ (H) & o(H), and F(H) > Favg
• Represent different large, good regions in search space
• Propagate exponentially with generations
• Combine with each other vigorously
• Lead to
l optimum (near-optimal) solutions

u Implicit Parallelism
s In each generation
• n function evaluations
• n3 schemata processed
• without any specific book-keeping !

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


GA v/s Traditional methods

(Direct Methods
u Gradients or any auxiliary information not required
u Can handle discontinuous, Multi-modal functions
(Stochastic formulation
u Independent of starting point
(Work on coding of variables
u Domain Discretization
u General purpose & robust code possible
(Work on a population of points
u Better chance of converging to global minimum
u Can identify multiple optimal solutions

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Drawbacks of GA
u Coding scheme should be meaningful & appropriate
s premature convergence

u GA parameters have to be tuned before starting


s population size, max. generations, pc, pm
s crossover type, selection strategy

u Constraints cannot be implicitly handled


s penalty function approach (usually)

u Large number of function evaluations


s Orders of magnitude higher than traditional algorithms

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


GA for constrained optimization
Maximize F(x) = 1/(1+ P(x)) or
Minimize F(x) = P(x), where
J K
P ( x ) = f ( x ) + ∑ u j g j ( x ) + ∑ v k hk ( x )
2 2

j =1 k =1

f (x)= objective function


uj = penalty coefficients for J inequality constraints gj
vk = penalty coefficients for K equality constraints hk

uj &vk are usually kept constant during one GA run


Large values can be assigned to uj &vk

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Other GA operators
u Fitness Function scaling
s To avoid premature convergence due to
• dominance by one string
• presence of several average fit strings
l transform F (x) to S(x) = aF(x) + b ; choose a & b such that
l best string has a predefined number of copies
l each string with average fit has only one copy
u Multi-point Crossover
s Single point crossover is biased in favor of right-most bits
u Uniform Crossover
s A bit at any location chosen either parent with p = 0.5
s for e.g. if 1st and 3rd bits are changed, then
(0) 0 0 0 0 =====> 1010 (10)
(11) 1 0 1 1 =====> 0001 (1)

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Recent development in GAs
u Real Coded GA
s work directly on design variables
u Simultaneous multiple solutions of multi-modal functions
s divide population using sharing functions
u Multi-criteria optimization
s pareto-optimal solutions

u Reported applications of GA in literature


s Gas pipeline layout optimization
s Job shop scheduling, Routing, Travelling salesperson
s Aircraft Design and Structural / Aerodynamic optimization
s Gas Turbine blade design
s Laminate stacking in Composite structures

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com


Happy computing with GA !!

PDF created with pdfFactory Pro trial version www.pdffactory.com

You might also like