How To Write A Statement Problem
How To Write A Statement Problem
The problem itself, stated clearly and with enough contextual detail to establish
why it is important
The method of solving the problem, often stated as a claim or a working thesis
The purpose, statement of objective and scope of the project being proposed.
These elements should be brief so that the reader does not get lost. One page is
enough for a statement problem.
Criteria for Research Problem Statements:
The problem provides the context for the research study and typically generates questions
which the research hopes to answer. In considering whether or not to move forward with
a research project, you will generally spend some time considering the problem. In your
proposal the statement of the problem is oftentimes the first part to be read with scrutiny.
I am ignoring the title and the abstract because ideally a title should be born out of a
problem statement and an abstract should be a summary after the problem has already
been dealt with. The problem statement should, therefore, "hook" the reader and establish
a persuasive context for what follows. You need to be able to clearly answer the question:
"what is the problem"? And "why is this problem worth my attention"? At the same time,
the problem statement limits scope by focusing on some variables and not others. It also
provides an opportunity for you to demonstrate why these variables are important.
A good problem originates from a research question formulated out of observation of the
reality. A literature review and a study of previous experiments, and research, are good
sources of research questions that are converted to statements of problem. Many
scientific researchers look at an area where a previous researcher generated some
interesting results, but never followed up. It could be an interesting area of research,
which nobody else has fully explored. The research question is formulated and then
restated in the form of a statement that notes the adverse consequences of the problem.
The type of study determines the kinds of question you should formulate: Is there
something wrong in society, theoretically unclear or in dispute, or historically worth
studying? Is there a program, drug, project, or product that needs evaluation? What do
you intend to create or produce and how will it be of value to you and society? Pose
questions such as: What "should" be occurring? (For example: Based on the national
average, small scale farmers in Bungoma district should be harvesting (xy) tons of maize
per acre) What is occurring? (For example: A recent household survey reported that 56%
of these farmers harvest only ( xy-ab) tons per acre.) What could happen if the problem is
not addressed? (For example: persistent low farm productivity in the district may lead to
widespread food insecurity and defeat the government policy on the same.)
The problem statement implies some question that your research will be answering.
Sometimes it is necessary to draft or pre-write for a while to discover what that point will
be (and often writers are unsure of their point until they have written the draft proposal
and discover the point near the end of the proposal). When you set up to write a statement
problem you should know that you are looking for something wrong… or something that
needs close attention. Your problem statement is the statement that makes a point about
the issues and information you are discussing, and is what the rest of the proposal hinges
upon. It is not just your topic, but what you are saying about your topic. In other words
there must be very good communication between your topic and the statement problem.
The importance of the problem should receive considerable and persuasive attention
[note that importance is inevitably subjective and will vary from researcher to
researcher]. Nevertheless objectivity can be injected by answering questions such as
these:
The problem statement should persuasively indicate that major variables can be measured
in some meaningful way. If you can identify likely objections to the study, identify and
respond to them here. The problem statement could close with a question. Typically, the
question could contain two variables, a measurable relationship, and some indication of
population. The purpose of the literature review that follows thereafter is to answer the
research problem question. If the literature cannot answer the question, the research is
needed to do so. An example question might be: this proposal poses the question, "What
is the relationship between farm productivity and farmer use of fertilizer"? The
information needed is (1) productivity levels and (2) some measure of fertilizer use. A
bad example might be: "What is the best way to train for use of fertilizer"? This is
insufficient because: What are the variables? What will be measured? What relationships
will be examined? There should be a close relationship between the title of the proposal
and the problem statement question. For example, in the good example above, the title of
this research project would be something like this: "Fertilizer use by small scale farmers
in Bungoma district and their farm productivity"
Stable Context
Status Quo
Destabilizing Moment
Consequences
Show readers why they should care: what bad things will happen if people continue to
believe the status quo? What good things will happen once they stop believing it? If we
continue to believe _______________, we'll never understand the larger question of
__________________________________________________________. Or Unless we
change _____________________, we will continue to have trouble with
__________________________________________________________. Or 11
4. 12. Once we understand ___________________, we'll begin to see the answer to the
problem __________________________________________________________. Or By
rethinking our approach to ___________________, we can fix ________________.
Resolution Provide a better theory/explanation to replace the status quo. State your
claim. ______________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________.
ONE MORE TEMPLATE FOR WRITING A STATEMENT PROBLEM
1. Start with a general problem identifying the need for the study. E.g. The problem
of this study is ______
2. State the specific problem proposed for research. (use citation & usually a number
to make it clear to the reader, e.g. 30% of the farms have been affected by the
Napier grass disease
3. Introductory words describing Methodological approach (i.e. Research Design)
are given and are appropriate to the specific proposal problem, e.g. this qualitative
study will explore... or this quantitative study will examine ...
4. General population group of proposed study is identified. Small scale farmers in
affected locations will be surveyed to determine ...
Identity fraud is one of the fastest growing crimes in America (Adams, 2002). In 2003, at
least 7 million Americans were victims of identity fraud, an increase of 79% from 2002
(AFP, 2003). GENERAL PROBLEM SUPPORTED BY LITERATURE The nation’s
system of personal identification and verification failed to stop the 9/11 terrorists, and
according to the 9/11 Investigations report (Strasser, 2004), some of the 19 hijackers of
the 9/11 attacks had fraudulent identification, passports, and other travel documents
(Wang, 2004). Seven of the 19 hijackers fraudulently obtained and used drivers’ licenses
as identification to board commercial aircraft (Driver’s License Fraud, 2003). Drivers’
licenses can still be obtained or made fraudulently and are still used as a de facto form of
national identification (Etzioni, 2004). Specific problem with citation. The 9/11
Commission Report (9/11 Commission, 2004) recommended using an NBIC system as a
more reliable and secure means of fighting terrorism. One associated problem of the 9/11
Commission’s recommendation is that various civil liberty advocates oppose the use of a
compulsory NBIC, arguing that compulsory use of NBICs may have a potential to
deprive citizens of their civil rights and invade individual privacy (Eaton, 2003). The
purpose of this research study will be to examine the motivational factors necessary for
the public to use voluntary NBICs as a more reliable and secure means of preventing
identity fraud. To fulfill this purpose, a quantitative TYPE OF STUDY research study
will survey students, faculty, administrative personnel, and employees of two community
colleges in Los Angeles County, California.