Case Body Shop WrittenCase
Case Body Shop WrittenCase
Case Body Shop WrittenCase
AND REPUTATION
MASTER CASES
By:
Sophia Collischon
Katharina Löw
Jannike Törnqvist
2018
First Edition
Student Case Papers
Corporate Brand Management and Reputation: Master’s Cases
The “Corporate Brand Management and Reputation: Master’s cases” is a case series
for applying the case method of teaching and learning in higher education. The cases
are relevant to brand strategists in private and public sector organizations, as well as
academics and students at universities, business schools, and executive education.
The cases are written by groups of master’s students as a course project. The specially
developed case format is defined as: “A management decision case describes a real
business situation leading up to a question(s) that requires assessment, analysis, and a
decision reached by discussion in class. The alternative approaches and recommendations
from the class discussion are followed by a description of the choices made by the case
company. This description is then discussed by the class.”
The student groups select the topics of their case providing updated and relevant
insights into the corporate brand management. The cases can be used as “written
cases” (handed out and read in advance, later to be discussed in class) and/or as
“live case” (presented by the teacher following a discussion in class). Each case
includes teaching notes, visuals with speaker’s notes, learning objectives, board
plans, and references.
The mission of the series is “to develop cases for discussion providing insights into the
theory and practice of corporate brand management and reputation, with the intent of
bridging the gap between academic teaching and managerial practice.”
The series is a result of co-creation between students and teachers at the elective
course Corporate Brand Management (BUSN35 – five-credit course/eight-week half-
time studies), part of the master’s program International Marketing and Brand
Management at Lund School of Economics and Management, Sweden. The cases
represent the result of the intellectual work of students under the supervision of the
head of course.
Although based on real events and despite references to actual companies, the cases
are solely intended to be a basis for class discussion, not as an endorsement, a source
of primary data, or an illustration of effective or ineffective management. The cases
are free to be used and are to be cited following international conventions.
Editor
Mats Urde
Associate Professor
[email protected]
WRITTEN CASE
The authors prepared this case solely as a basis for class discussion and not as an endorsement, a source of primary data, or an
illustration of effective or ineffective management. Although based on real events and despite occasional references to actual
companies, this case is fictitious and any resemblance to actual persons or entities is coincidental.
M A N A G E M E NT D E C I S I O N C A S E
19 – 2018
MARCH 14, 2018
SOPHIA COLLISCHON
KATHARINA LÖW
JANNIKE TÖRNQVIST
Industry Background
The cosmetic industry is described as a lucrative, innovative and fast paced
industry in which L’Oréal, Procter & Gamble and Unilever are the three biggest players.
It is a vital part of the world economy in terms of its contribution to the global GDP.
In 2006, the global cosmetics market grew by estimated 4,9 percent and the industry
generated approximately $230 billion in sales globally. However, over the last decade
a change of consumer demands within the industry have been recognized. As such,
consumers are increasingly concerned and aware of environmental issues and show
growing interest in cosmetics products containing natural ingredients free of animal
testing. Ethical consumption has been existing for centuries, and refers to
considerations when choosing products and services with regards to animal welfare,
labor standards and personal health concerns. However, the trend has increased
considerably in the beginning of the 21st century. Therefore, a growing number of
cosmetic brands try to attract consumers by promoting ethical and sustainable values
and consumption.
• Safety
• Quality
• Efficacy
• Sincerity
1 L’Oréal Group (2006). Annual Report 2006 [PDF] Available at: http://www.loreal-
finance.com/eng/annual-report-2006 [Accessed 23 February 2018]
2 L’Oréal Group (2006). Annual Report 2006 [PDF] Available at: http://www.loreal-
The brand uses natural ingredients in its products while acting highly transparent
to gain the trust from its stakeholders. The mission statement reflects this commitment
and strives “to dedicate [...] business to the pursuit of social and environmental
change.”3. Their core values and mission are recurring themes within their marketing
communication. Instead of pursuing industry standards, their advertisement can be
interpreted as a form of rebellion against unattainable beauty standards and the
promotion of their ethical and sustainable behavior (see Exhibit 2).
In the years to come, The Body Shop has started to grow rapidly, opening two
franchises every month while simultaneously being involved in public activism. It has
become the first commercial company to start a collaboration together with Greenpeace.
With the strong vision and leadership from Roddick, several successful campaigns
have been launched, catching public attention and reaching out to people worldwide.
‘Against Animal Testing’ has been one of the more prominent initiatives and has
ultimately led to changes in the European law regarding cosmetics and animal testing.
The customer base has been constantly growing due to high levels of trust, a good
reputation and loyal customers that shared the same values as the company.
After Anita Roddick has decided to take The Body Shop public in 1984, she has
realized the challenge of running a public company. Rapid growth and new
shareholder demands for profit have made the CEO feel like losing control. Moreover,
the strategic focus of the company has started to shift away from emphasizing
sustainable practices towards a more profit-oriented approach. Consequently, Anita
Roddick has felt that she was not able to handle the increasing pressure and started
searching for potential buyers.
The Acquisition
The Body Shop has faced difficulties to find suitable buyers. This has mostly been
due to its franchisee and the ownership of brick-and-mortar stores, a rare occurrence
for most brands within the cosmetics industry. However, in 2006 the French cosmetic
giant L’Oréal has approached The Body Shop with an offer. Before L’Oréal’s takeover,
Roddick has made arrangements to ensure that the ethical principles would still be
respected.
The acquisition has provided opportunities for both sides: On the one hand, The
Body Shop has seen the acquisition as an opportunity to gain access to L’Oréal’s well
established supply chain as well as satisfying shareholder demands for profit. On the
other hand, for L’Oréal, adding a brand with a unique identity and sustainable
business model to its portfolio has facilitated the entrance into a rapidly growing niche
The brand manager of L’Oréal approaches you with three potential strategies in
order to maintain the strong corporate reputation of The Body Shop despite the
criticized acquisition. The strategies are:
• Strategy 1:
Placement of The Body Shop as an independent business unit within L’Oréal
• Strategy 2:
Changing L’Oréal’s core values and adjusting their mission statement to
become more appealing to conscious consumers
• Strategy 3:
Alignment of The Body Shop’s marketing communication with L’Oréal’s
Taking the role of L’Oréal’s Executive Team, how would you evaluate each strategy
and why?