Kode

Dokumen
Universitas Negeri Surabaya
Fakultas Bahasa dan Seni
Program Studi S1 Sastra Inggris

RENCANA PEMBELAJARAN SEMESTER

MATA KULIAH (MK) KODE Rumpun MK BOBOT (sks) SEMESTER Tgl
Penyusunan
English Morphology and Syntax 7920203272 Mata Kuliah Wajib Program T=3 P=0 ECTS=4.77 3 30
Studi September
2024
OTORISASI Pengembang RPS Koordinator RMK Koordinator Program Studi

Dr. Dian Rivia Himmawati, S.S, M.Hum Dr. Dian Rivia Himmawati, Dr. Ali Mustofa, S.S., M.Pd.
S.S.,M.Hum

Model Project Based Learning

Pembelajaran
Capaian CPL-PRODI yang dibebankan pada MK
Pembelajaran
(CP) CPL-4 Mengembangkan diri secara berkelanjutan dan berkolaborasi.
CPL-5 Mampu mengaplikasikan konsep dan teori Linguistik dasar dalam Bahasa Inggris untuk merespons beragam fenomena
bahasa
CPL-10 Mampu menghasilkan karya akademik atau non-akademik dengan baik dalam bentuk lisan maupun tulisan untuk
beragam audiens dan tujuan
CPL-11 Mampu mendemonstrasikan kemampuan berbahasa Inggris, yang ditunjukkan dengan pencapaian skor tes kemampuan
Bahasa Inggris yang setara dengan minimal CEFR level B2
Capaian Pembelajaran Mata Kuliah (CPMK)
CPMK - 1 Being able to communicate and collaborate with peers to analyze and solve English morphology and syntax-related
problems
CPMK - 2 Being able to apply theoretical concepts English Morphology and Syntax to analyse and interpret word formation process
and sentence structure
CPMK - 3 Being able to utilize linguistic theories to asses the impact of morphological and syntatical variations on meaning and
communication accross different contexts.
CPMK - 4 Being able to produce clear and coherent presentation and written reports that demonstrate an understanding of English
Morphology and Syntax concepts, supported by evidence and critical reasoning.
CPMK - 5 Being able to comprehend and produce English Morphology and Syntax analysis in a product
Matrik CPL - CPMK

CPMK CPL-4 CPL-5 CPL-10 CPL-11

CPMK-1 ✔

CPMK-2 ✔

CPMK-3 ✔ ✔

CPMK-4 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

CPMK-5 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

Matrik CPMK pada Kemampuan akhir tiap tahapan belajar (Sub-CPMK)

CPMK Minggu Ke

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

CPMK-1 ✔ ✔ ✔

CPMK-2 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔

CPMK-3 ✔ ✔

CPMK-4 ✔

CPMK-5 ✔ ✔ ✔ ✔
Deskripsi This course aims to provide students with critical analytical skills that are essential for linguistics and related fields, fostering a deeper
Singkat MK appreciation for language diversity and complexity. Topics include word formation processes, morphemes, sentence structure, syntactic
categories, and their social implications. The course utilizes lectures, interactive discussions, and hands-on activities, encouraging active
engagement through real-world examples and collaborative exercises. Assessment methods include exams, class participation to evaluate
understanding and application of concepts, and collaborative projects to explore practical applications of morphology and syntax, fostering
teamwork and real-world relevance. This course aligns with SDG 4 (Quality Education) by promoting linguistic diversity, and SDG 10
(Reduced Inequalities) by addressing language and identity . By the end of the course, students will critically analyze English language
structures and their impact.
Pustaka Utama :

1. Harley, Heidi. 2006. English Words.Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

2. McCathy, Andrew Carstairs. 2002. An Introduction to English Morphology (words and their structure). Edinburgh: Edinburgh
University Press.
3. Miller, Jim. 2002. An Introduction to English Syntax. Edinburg: Edinburg University Press
4. Sobin, Nicholas, 2011. Syntatic Analysis The Basics. West Sussex: Willey Blackwell.
5. Fromkin, V., Rodman, R. and Hyams, N. 2011. An Introduction to Language. 9th ed. USA: Heinle
6. Mattielo, E. 2008. A Description of its Morphology, Semantics and Sociology. Milan: Polimetrica
7. Lieber, R. 2009. Introducing Morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
8. Mattielo, E . 2013. Extra-grammatical Morphology in English. Berlin: Hubert & Co
9. Plag, Ingo. 2018 Word Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

Pendukung :

Dosen Dr. Widyastuti, S.S., M.Pd.

Pengampu Dr. Dian Rivia Himmawati, S.S., M.Hum.
Lisetyo Ariyanti, S.S., M.Pd.
Ayunita Leliana, S.S., M.Pd.
Adam Damanhuri, S.S., M.Hum.
Fariq Shiddiq Tasaufy, S.S., M.Hum.
Cicilia Deandra Maya Putri, S.Hum., M.A.
Bantuk Pembelajaran,
Kemampuan akhir Penilaian Metode Pembelajaran, Materi Bobot
Mg Ke- tiap tahapan belajar Penugasan Mahasiswa, Pembelajaran Penilaian
[ Estimasi Waktu] [ Pustaka ] (%)
(Sub-CPMK)
Indikator Kriteria & Bentuk Luring (offline) Daring (online)
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8)
1 Being able to identify 1.Students Kriteria: Lecturing Individual assignment Materi: A 2%
a word and its parts: provide a 1.Written task (1- Hands-on Activity Hands-on Activity word and its
Minggu ke 1

morphemes, roots,
affixes and their precise and 100) Discussion and parts: root
shapes and describe accurate 2.Answering Reflection affixes and
how these processes definition of questions (1-5) 3 X 50 their shapes
contribute to the bound Pustaka:
structure and
meaning words morphemes Bentuk Penilaian : McCathy,
and free Aktifitas Partisipasif Andrew
morphemes, Carstairs.
distinguishing
2002. An
clearly between
Introduction to
them.
2.Students English
accurately Morphology
identify roots (words and
and affixes in a their
range of words, structure).
demonstrating Edinburgh:
a deep
Edinburgh
understanding
University
of their shapes
and functions. Press.
3.Students
demonstrate a Materi: Pre-
thorough and Suf-fix-es:
understanding Engl-ish
of how Morph-o-log-y
affixation Pustaka:
changes word Harley, Heidi.
structure, 2006. English
providing clear Words.Oxford:
and accurate Blackwell
examples
Publishing
4.Students
accurately
explain how
affixation
affects word
meaning,
including
nuanced
changes and
providing
multiple
examples.
 2 Being able to apply 1.Students will Kriteria: Lecturing Materi: A 2%
and analyse different clearly define 1.Written task (1- Group word and its
Minggu ke 2

processes of word
formation, such as derivation and 100) Discussion forms:
derivation, and explain how it 2.Answering Presentation inflection
inflection, and involves adding Questions (1-5) 3 X 50 Pustaka:
describe how these prefixes or 3.Group McCathy,
processes contribute
to the structure and suffixes to a Discussion (1-5) Andrew
meaning words. base word to Carstairs.
create a new Bentuk Penilaian :
2002. An
word with a Aktifitas Partisipasif
Introduction to
different
meaning or English
grammatical Morphology
function. (words and
2.Students will their
apply structure).
derivational Edinburgh:
affixes to base
Edinburgh
words to form
University
new words and
explain the Press.
change in
meaning or Materi: A
grammatical word and its
function. relatives:
3.Students will derivation
define inflection Pustaka:
and explain McCathy,
how it modifies Andrew
a word to Carstairs.
express 2002. An
different
Introduction to
grammatical
English
features such
as tense, Morphology
number, or (words and
case without their
changing the structure).
word’s core Edinburgh:
meaning. Edinburgh
4.Students will University
correctly inflect
Press.
base words to
show
grammatical Materi:
variations and Lexeme
describe the formation: the
effect on the familiar
word's function Pustaka:
in a sentence. Lieber, R.
5.Students will 2009.
examine how Introducing
each word Morphology.
formation Cambridge:
process
Cambridge
contributes to
University
the overall
meaning and Press
grammatical
function of
words in
context.
6.Students can
accurately
apply the
conversion
process to base
words,
demonstrating
how the word's
function and
meaning
change with its
new
grammatical
category.
7.Students can
analyze
sentences or
texts to identify
instances of
conversion and
describe how
this process
impacts the
meaning and
grammatical
role of the word
within the
context.
 3 Being able to apply 1.Students will Kriteria: Lecturing Individual work Materi: 2%
and analyse different define 1.Written task (1- Group Discussion Compound
Minggu ke 3

processes of
compounding, and compounding 100) Discussion words, blends,
describe how these and explain 2.Answering Hands-0n and phrasal
processes contribute how it involves Questions (1-5) Activities words
to the structure and combining two 3 X 50 Pustaka:
meaning words.
or more base Bentuk Penilaian : McCathy,
words to create Aktifitas Partisipasif Andrew
a new word Carstairs.
with a distinct
2002. An
meaning.
Introduction to
2.Students will
create new English
compound Morphology
words from (words and
existing base their
words and structure).
explain the new Edinburgh:
word's meaning
Edinburgh
based on the
University
combination.
3.Students will Press.
identify and
label the Materi:
processes of Lexeme
compounding formation: the
in given words, familiar
explaining how Pustaka:
each process Lieber, R.
affects the 2009.
word’s Introducing
structure and Morphology.
meaning.
Cambridge:
Cambridge
University
Press

4 Being able to apply 1.Student clearly Kriteria: Lecturing Discussion Materi: 2%

and analyse different defines Answering Question Group Individual Work Lexeme
Minggu ke 4

processes of word (1-100)

formation (non blending and Discussion formation: the
affixation) and explains how it Hands-on familiar
describe how these Bentuk Penilaian : Activities Pustaka:
involves
processes contribute Aktifitas Partisipasif
merging parts 3 X 50 Lieber, R.
to the structure and
meaning words. of two or more 2009.
words to create Introducing
a new word
Morphology.
with a distinct
Cambridge:
meaning.
2.Student forms Cambridge
new blended University
words and Press
explains their
meanings Materi:
based on the Where do
combination. Words come
3.Student clearly from
defines clipping Pustaka:
and explains Harley, Heidi.
how it involves 2006. English
shortening a
Words.Oxford:
longer word to
Blackwell
create a new,
abbreviated Publishing
form.
4.Student Materi:
creates clipped Abbreviation,
forms of longer Blends,
words and Reduplication,
explains their Minor
meanings. Phenomena
5.Student clearly Pustaka:
defines Mattielo, E .
acronyms and 2013. Extra-
explains how grammatical
they are formed Morphology in
from the initial
English.
letters of a
Berlin: Hubert
phrase to
create a new & Co
word.
6.Student forms
new acronyms
and explains
their meanings
based on the
initial letters of
phrases.
7.Student can
differentiate
between
acronyms and
 initialisms and
apply the
correct
pronunciation
for each.
8.Student
recognizes
reduplicative
forms and
understand
their usage in
different
contexts.
9.Student can
identify and
understand the
relationship
between the
original word
and its
backformed
counterpart.
10.Student uses
backformed
words
appropriately in
sentences and
understand
their
grammatical
function.
11.Student can
produce
backformed
words from
given terms
and understand
the derivational
process.
 5 Being able to apply 1.Students can Kriteria: Lecturing Lecturing Materi: 2%
syntactic theories to accurately 1.Practical JIgsaw Individual assignment Construction
Minggu ke 5

analyse diagram
structures, create syntactic Assignment Discussion and
demonstrating an diagrams, such 2.Classroom 3 X 50 Constituents
understanding of as tree Activities (1-5) Pustaka:
phrase structure diagrams or Miller, Jim.
rules, sentence Bentuk Penilaian :
constituents, and dependency 2002. An
syntactic diagrams, Aktifitas Partisipasif, Introduction to
dependencies based on Praktik / Unjuk Kerja
English
syntactic
Syntax.
theories (e.g.,
X-bar theory, Edinburg:
dependency Edinburg
grammar). University
2.Students apply Press
theoretical
constructs, Materi:
such as phrase Construction
structure rules and
and syntactic Constituents
categories Pustaka:
(e.g., NP, VP, Sobin,
PP), correctly
Nicholas,
in their
2011. Syntatic
diagrams
3.Students Analysis The
correctly Basics. West
identify and Sussex: Willey
apply phrase Blackwell.
structure rules
to generate
syntactic
structures
4.Students can
form and
identify various
types of
phrases (NPs,
VPs, PPs)
based on the
rules of phrase
structure,
showing how
different
elements
combine to
form larger
units.
5.Students can
explain how
specific phrase
structure rules
are applied in
their analysis
and how these
rules help in
forming
grammatical
structures.
 6 Being able to apply 1.Students can Kriteria: Lecturing Lecturing Materi: 2%
syntactic theories to accurately 1.Practical JIgsaw Individual assignment Construction
Minggu ke 6

analyse diagram
structures, identify the Assignment Discussion and
demonstrating an constituents of 2.Classroom 3 X 50 Constituents
understanding of a sentence, Activities (1-5) Pustaka:
phrase structure such as Miller, Jim.
rules, sentence Bentuk Penilaian :
constituents, and subject, 2002. An
syntactic predicate, Aktifitas Partisipasif, Introduction to
dependencies object, and Praktik / Unjuk Kerja
English
complements.
Syntax.
2.Students apply
constituency Edinburg:
tests (e.g., Edinburg
substitution, University
movement, Press
clefting) to
verify the Materi:
constituents Construction
3.Students can and
identify and Constituents
explain Pustaka:
syntactic Sobin,
dependencies
Nicholas,
between words
2011. Syntatic
and phrases,
such as Analysis The
subject-verb Basics. West
agreement or Sussex: Willey
verb-object Blackwell.
relationships.
4.Students
create accurate
dependency
diagrams that
illustrate the
syntactic
relationships
between words,
showing how
different
elements
depend on
each other.
5.Students can
articulate how
syntactic
dependencies
work and why
they are crucial
for sentence
structure.
6.Students
integrate
theoretical
knowledge
from different
syntactic
theories to
analyze
complex
sentences
7.Students
critically
evaluate the
effectiveness of
different
syntactic
theories in
explaining
sentence
structure and
dependencies.
8.Students apply
multiple
syntactic
theories (e.g.,
generative
grammar and
dependency
grammar) to
analyze the
same sentence
and compare
the results.
 7 Being able to use 1.Students will Kriteria: Group Group Discussion Materi: New 5%
morphological and be able to Group Presentation Discussion Contextual Analysis: Development
Minggu ke 7

syntactical analysis (1-10)

to interpret text, assess how Contextual Text samples from in morphology
applying theoretical morphological Analysis: Text different contexts (e.g., Pustaka:
Bentuk Penilaian :
knowledge to real- and syntactical samples from formal academic Plag, Ingo.
world linguistic Aktifitas Partisipasif, different contexts writing, informal social
variations 2018 Word
issues. Praktik / Unjuk Kerja (e.g., formal media posts, business
impact meaning Formation in
and academic writing, correspondence).
English.
communication informal social Presentation
media posts, Cambridge:
in various
contexts. business Cambridge
2.Students will correspondence). University
be able to Presentation Press
develop
analytical skills Instructions: Materi:
for evaluating Contextual Fundamental
linguistic data Analysis: Assign English
and its different texts to Syntax
implications for student groups, Pustaka:
effective each Miller, Jim.
communication. representing a 2002. An
different context.
Introduction to
Identification:
Each group English
identifies and Syntax.
analyzes Edinburg:
morphological Edinburg
and syntactical University
features specific Press
to their text‘s
context. Materi:
Variation Language and
Assessment: society
Groups assess Pustaka:
how context
Fromkin, V.,
influences
morphological Rodman, R.
choices (e.g., and Hyams,
formality) and N. 2011. An
syntactical Introduction to
structures (e.g., Language. 9th
complexity). ed. USA:
Report: Groups Heinle
present their
findings, focusing
on the impact of
context on
linguistic
variation.
3 X 50
8 Being able to apply Students will be Kriteria: Text Analysis Materi: All 20%
the understanding of able to syntesize 1-100 (Mid Test) Questions and materials
Minggu ke 8

morphology and morphology and

syntax concepts to syntax concept Answers (Mid given in
analyse text or discussed on week Bentuk Penilaian : Test) meeting 1-7
spoken discours 1 until week 2 to Tes 3 X 50 Pustaka:
analyse text
9 Being able to create 1.Students will Kriteria: 1. Introduction 1. Introduction and Materi: Slang 5%
an academic product analyze the Presentasi Portfolio and Research: Research: Background Pustaka:
Minggu ke 9

related to English
morphology and morphology Background Reading: Students start Mattielo, E.
and syntax of Bentuk Penilaian : Reading: with an overview of
syntax, 2008. A
demonstrating contemporary Aktifitas Partisipasif, Students start morphological and Description of
proficiency in English slang Penilaian Portofolio with an overview syntactic theories
understanding its
terms and their of morphological relevant to slang and
scholarly discussion Morphology,
in the field. evolution over and syntactic informal language.
time. theories relevant 2. Slang Selection: Semantics
2.Students will to slang and Each student or group and
investigate how informal selects a set of modern Sociology.
slang reflects language. slang terms to study, Milan:
changes in 2. Slang focusing on their Polimetrica
language Selection: Each morphological structure
structure and student or group (e.g., compounding,
usage, and selects a set of blending, affixation)
present their modern slang and syntactic usage
findings in a terms to study, (e.g., phrase structure,
comprehensive focusing on their sentence placement).
report, morphological
presentation structure (e.g.,
and making compounding,
games blending,
affixation) and
syntactic usage
(e.g., phrase
structure,
sentence
placement).
3 X 50
 10 Being able to create 1.Students Kriteria: Data Collection Data collection and Materi: Slang 5%
an academic product collect 1.Presentasi and analysis analysis Pustaka:
Minggu ke 10

related to English
morphology and examples of Portfolio 6 X 50 Mattielo, E.
syntax, their chosen 2.log book 2008. A
demonstrating slang terms Description of
proficiency in from various Bentuk Penilaian :
understanding its
sources, such Aktifitas Partisipasif,
scholarly discussion Morphology,
in the field. as social Penilaian Portofolio
media, music Semantics
lyrics, and and
online forums Sociology.
2.Students Milan:
analyze the Polimetrica
morphological
processes
involved in the
formation of
these slang
terms (e.g.,
how words are
shortened or
combined).
3.Students
examine how
these slang
terms fit into
sentences and
their impact on
syntactic
structures.

11 Being able to create 1.Students Kriteria: Data Collection Data collection and Materi: Slang 5%
an academic product collect 1.Presentasi and analysis analysis Pustaka:
Minggu ke 11

related to English
morphology and examples of Portfolio 6 X 50 Mattielo, E.
syntax, their chosen 2.log book 2008. A
demonstrating slang terms Description of
proficiency in from various Bentuk Penilaian :
understanding its
sources, such Aktifitas Partisipasif,
scholarly discussion Morphology,
in the field. as social Penilaian Portofolio
media, music Semantics
lyrics, and and
online forums Sociology.
2.Students Milan:
analyze the Polimetrica
morphological
processes
involved in the
formation of
these slang
terms (e.g.,
how words are
shortened or
combined).
3.Students
examine how
these slang
terms fit into
sentences and
their impact on
syntactic
structures.
 12 Being able to create 1.Students write Kriteria: Report Writing Materi: Slang 10%
an academic product a detailed Presentasi Portfolio Presentation Pustaka:
Minggu ke 12

related to English
morphology and report that Class Discussion Mattielo, E.
syntax, includes: * The Bentuk Penilaian : and Reflection: 2008. A
demonstrating history and Aktifitas Partisipasif, Peer Review Description of
proficiency in origin of each Penilaian Portofolio Reflection Paper:
understanding its
slang term. * 3 X 50
scholarly discussion Morphology,
in the field. Morphological
processes used Semantics
in the creation and
of these terms. Sociology.
* Syntactic Milan:
patterns and Polimetrica
how these
terms are
integrated into
modern English
syntax.
2.Students
create a
presentation
summarizing
their findings.
This could
include slides,
examples of
slang usage in
context, and a
brief discussion
on the
sociolinguistic
implications of
these terms.
3.Students
present their
findings to the
class, followed
by a Q&A
session where
peers can ask
questions and
provide
feedback
13 Being able to create Students develop Kriteria: Brainstorming Session Materi: Slang 2%
an academic product prototype of the Presentasi Portfolio 3 X 50 to make games related Pustaka:
Minggu ke 13

related to English game

morphology and to English Slang Mattielo, E.
Bentuk Penilaian :
syntax, 2008. A
demonstrating Penilaian Portofolio
Description of
proficiency in
understanding its
scholarly discussion Morphology,
in the field.
Semantics
and
Sociology.
Milan:
Polimetrica

14 Being able to create Students design Kriteria: Developing Brainstorming Session Materi: Slang 6%
an academic product the game board, 1.portfolio games related to to make games related Pustaka:
Minggu ke 14

related to English cards, rules, and

morphology and other components 2.log book English Slang to English Slang Mattielo, E.
syntax, based on their 3 X 50 2008. A
demonstrating concept outline. Bentuk Penilaian : Description of
proficiency in Penilaian Portofolio
understanding its
scholarly discussion Morphology,
in the field.
Semantics
and
Sociology.
Milan:
Polimetrica

15 Being able to create Students playtest Kriteria: Game playtesting Game playtesting Materi: Slang 10%
an academic product each other’s - 3 X 50 Pustaka:
Minggu ke 15

related to English games, focusing

morphology and on how well the Mattielo, E.
Bentuk Penilaian :
syntax, game incorporates 2008. A
demonstrating and teaches Penilaian Portofolio
Description of
proficiency in slang’s
understanding morphological and its
scholarly discussion syntactical Morphology,
in the field. features
Semantics
and
Sociology.
Milan:
Polimetrica
 16 Being able to create students present Kriteria: Game Game Presentation Materi: Slang 20%
an academic product their final games, 1.Peer Review Presentation and and Reflection Pustaka:
Minggu ke 16

related to English explaining the

morphology and design choices and 2.Game Design Reflection Mattielo, E.
syntax, educational and 3 X 50 2008. A
demonstrating objectives. Development Description of
proficiency in 3.Presentation and
understanding its
scholarly discussion Reflection
Morphology,
in the field.
Bentuk Penilaian : Semantics
Aktifitas Partisipasif, and
Penilaian Hasil Project Sociology.
/ Penilaian Produk Milan:
Polimetrica

Rekap Persentase Evaluasi : Project Based Learning

No Evaluasi Persentase
1. Aktifitas Partisipasif 35%
2. Penilaian Hasil Project / Penilaian Produk 10%
3. Penilaian Portofolio 30.5%
4. Praktik / Unjuk Kerja 4.5%
5. Tes 20%
100%

Catatan
1. Capaian Pembelajaran Lulusan Prodi (CPL - Prodi) adalah kemampuan yang dimiliki oleh setiap lulusan prodi yang merupakan
internalisasi dari sikap, penguasaan pengetahuan dan ketrampilan sesuai dengan jenjang prodinya yang diperoleh melalui proses
pembelajaran.
2. CPL yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah adalah beberapa capaian pembelajaran lulusan program studi (CPL-Prodi) yang
digunakan untuk pembentukan/pengembangan sebuah mata kuliah yang terdiri dari aspek sikap, ketrampulan umum, ketrampilan
khusus dan pengetahuan.
3. CP Mata kuliah (CPMK) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari CPL yang dibebankan pada mata kuliah, dan
bersifat spesifik terhadap bahan kajian atau materi pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
4. Sub-CPMK Mata kuliah (Sub-CPMK) adalah kemampuan yang dijabarkan secara spesifik dari CPMK yang dapat diukur atau
diamati dan merupakan kemampuan akhir yang direncanakan pada tiap tahap pembelajaran, dan bersifat spesifik terhadap materi
pembelajaran mata kuliah tersebut.
5. Indikator penilaian kemampuan dalam proses maupun hasil belajar mahasiswa adalah pernyataan spesifik dan terukur yang
mengidentifikasi kemampuan atau kinerja hasil belajar mahasiswa yang disertai bukti-bukti.
6. Kreteria Penilaian adalah patokan yang digunakan sebagai ukuran atau tolok ukur ketercapaian pembelajaran dalam penilaian
berdasarkan indikator-indikator yang telah ditetapkan. Kreteria penilaian merupakan pedoman bagi penilai agar penilaian konsisten
dan tidak bias. Kreteria dapat berupa kuantitatif ataupun kualitatif.
7. Bentuk penilaian: tes dan non-tes.
8. Bentuk pembelajaran: Kuliah, Responsi, Tutorial, Seminar atau yang setara, Praktikum, Praktik Studio, Praktik Bengkel, Praktik
Lapangan, Penelitian, Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat dan/atau bentuk pembelajaran lain yang setara.
9. Metode Pembelajaran: Small Group Discussion, Role-Play & Simulation, Discovery Learning, Self-Directed Learning, Cooperative
Learning, Collaborative Learning, Contextual Learning, Project Based Learning, dan metode lainnya yg setara.
10. Materi Pembelajaran adalah rincian atau uraian dari bahan kajian yg dapat disajikan dalam bentuk beberapa pokok dan sub-
pokok bahasan.
11. Bobot penilaian adalah prosentasi penilaian terhadap setiap pencapaian sub-CPMK yang besarnya proposional dengan tingkat
kesulitan pencapaian sub-CPMK tsb., dan totalnya 100%.
12. TM=Tatap Muka, PT=Penugasan terstruktur, BM=Belajar mandiri.

RPS ini telah divalidasi pada tanggal

Koordinator Program Studi S1 UPM Program Studi S1 Sastra

Sastra Inggris Inggris

Dr. Ali Mustofa, S.S., M.Pd.

NIDN 0014067509 NIDN

File PDF ini digenerate pada tanggal 30 September 2024 Jam 19:23 menggunakan aplikasi RPS-OBE SiDia Unesa