Wsc syllabus

Breaking world records

Egypt, if you were culturally aware, you’d think of the library of Alexandria when you hear the
countries name. The loss of this great library was tragic as it had vast knowledge on a variety of
topics that mankind could not even think about as a thought. The loss of library of Alexandria was
like witnessing the loss of their cultural identity for Egypt. Destroying a societies history means that
your disrespecting the way of life their forefathers have. It means that you are taking what the have
to inquire about the past. If you destroy the house of wisdom, how would someone know the
exclusive information that was in it? Exactly, they wouldn’t. You taking their history from them is like
snatching their means of research.

If TikTok just vanished, we would think that it had been banned as not to long ago there were rumor
is spiraling about the fact that it might get banned but all that led to was more content for the
creators on the platform. When we found out it just banishes, there will be crazy rumors, theories,
articles that will go viral. The owner of TikTok will be questioned, being successful I am sure he
wouldn’t want his source for his earning to vanish, which is why people would quickly rule out the
possibility that this was his doing. If wikipedia were to vanish the situation would be different. I for one
don’t believe for a second that if Wikipedia shut down tomorrow, anything in the world would be much
different than it was yesterday. That’s just my opinion though. I got some insightful input from a few
different people who have spent time editing Wikipedia, as well as respected academics working in
the ‘real’ world of academic institutions.

The boring but truthful answer is that we’d just get along with other sources. I suspect a few clones
would probably pop up here and there. Britannica and World Book would see an upsurge in web
traffic and paid subscriptions. A lot of us would talk about the “early days of the Internet” when
information was free like Wikipedia.

They had long extensive methods for disaster-proofing the tablets. It was a long, tedious and time
consuming process. According to tradition, monks used wood from silver magnolias, white birches
and cherry trees from the Southern coast of the peninsula. The wood was soaked in sea water for
three years, then cut into individual blocks during the winter to prevent warping. Each piece was then
boiled in salt water to prevent insect infestations and mould, and dried before being carved. The
delicate carvings of the characters are incredibly consistent in form, as if they were the work of one
person.

Adopting similar strategies for our records could be a possible technique, but if we closely observe
what is happening and what the future may be then this may not be the most efficient way. The future
is perhaps going to involve majority of technology that we can’t even think about and so it means That
most probably in the future such means may be forgotten, and so using these means to preserve our
records might actually result in us losing them. We can prepare for the events that may occur in the
future. We can actually create two separate techniques for situations. For instance, if the future is
filled with technology, then we should try to take a Morden approach and preserve these records
online we can also for a situation in which the world stays the same or is it only a little bit different,
create these records and physical forms and store them in a safe place butt keep in mind, the past
mistakes such as the misfortune that happened to the library of Alexandria as it could happen again.

If a time capsule that had acquired my attention was needed to made for scholars a century from now,
I would put all the things we wished we had from about a hundred years ago. For instance we
might’ve wanted articles from that time, and so I would send them some of that, I would also put notes
that could help them for preparing as we would history till then and having actual history notes from
our time could help them get an in-depth and deeply detailing report.
All the Czar's Horses: The Politics of Putting the Past
Together Again
A country should become great again when it is done reflecting. When It has retrieved its sense of
humanity. When you hear trump’s election slogan” make America great again” you’ll likely think about
this topic. The leader is the one who guides the people. The people have the power to take it all up hill
or down but to keep it all under control we actually have a leader to avert the people’s mind from this
topic the leaders role is to direct the mind of the people towards the greater good. But that one leader
is also from the people so he must have a similar thinking to what we think, and that is where you are
wrong. No, the leader does not think like us because the candidates are always critically evaluating
and analyzing and which is what makes them fit to lead. I a leader does not do this they may not be
able to lead and that is when a country cant take a turn for the greater good. All in all, a country
should become great again when a person who is fit to help then take that step and keep comes
along.

If a person wants to opt out of the modern world, they should have the right to but then again if this
becomes known, people such as doctors who have stressful lives, or therapists, or construction
works, or even beggars because they have a constant worry about being able to put food on the table
tomorrow might just start using this as an excuse to escape reality. But when reality hits it hits hard.
Yes, it is their and they are their legal guardian, they shall know what is best for their child, as they
have lived life and experienced it so they know what do and what not to do.

People who implement these restriction on their own group are respecting others opinions and letting
others respect theirs, they are not forcing anyone, though they should have consent of its group
members for this.while on the other hand a groups that seeks to implements its preferences more
broadly is not respecting others ideals, opinions and believes. They are implementing their own
opinions on others without know why the others may be against it.