Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) and Its Efficiency With Respect To Various Combustion Parameters
Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) and Its Efficiency With Respect To Various Combustion Parameters
A publication of
Nitrogen oxides, which are formed for example during the combustion process in coal power plants, have
negative impact on the environment. It is one of the main components of greenhouse gases and together with
sulfur oxides cause acid rains. When reducing the formation and discharge of nitrogen oxides, it is possible to
proceed several technological processes. One of the methods that is used in practice for reducing these
pollutants, is selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR). Increasingly stringent emission limits forcing businesses
to invest in a system for removing NOx. SNCR method is one of the cheapest, but sufficiently effective alternative
to achieve these levels.
This contribution describes the experimental tests of injecting a reducing agent into the flue gas stream. In this
case a reducing agent (with the trade name Satamin) consisting of an aqueous urea solution and an additives.
The tests were performed in the boiler K14 at the power plant in Ostrava - Třebovice, CZ. The aim of the tests
was to reduce NOx emissions achieved by primary measures (e.g., adjusting the pressure of the boiler unit, low
NOx pulverised coal burners, change media for grinding mill circuits) so that the flue gas at the outlet reaches
approximately 190 mg/mN3, because NOx emission limit specified by legislation is established to 200 mg/mN3.
Efficiency SNCR was determined based on the conversion rate of Satamin and the associated reduction of
primary NOx to a final value measured at a chimney. The contribution shows and compares the impact of various
factors (the concentration of CO in the flue gas stream, the primary value of NO x, the temperature in the
combustion chamber, etc.) that affect, positively or negatively, the reaction process of Satamin and NO x
according to the equations (Dvořák, et al., 2010):
4 𝑁𝑂 + 2 (𝑁𝐻2 )2 𝐶𝑂 + 2 𝐻2 𝑂 + 𝑂2 → 4 𝑁2 + 6 𝐻2 𝑂 + 2 𝐶𝑂2 (1)
6 𝑁𝑂2 + 4 (𝑁𝐻2 )2 𝐶𝑂 + 4 𝐻2 𝑂 → 7 𝑁2 + 12 𝐻2 𝑂 + 4 𝐶𝑂2 (2)
1. Introduction
Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) is one of the denitrification methods, which belongs to the secondary
measures. Operation costs of SNCR are lower than SCR and also efficiency is very different. Average efficiency
for SCR is about 92 % (with fixed bed catalytic reactor), however for SNCR is mostly about 55 % (European
IPPC Bureau, 2014). It depends on boiler condition and significantly on temperature at level of dosing reducing
agents (e.g. ammonia and urea). Suitable range of temperature is called temperature window. Reduction by
applying urea is usually done in ranging from 950 °C to 1,050 °C (European IPPC Bureau, 2014).
Urea reacts with NOx contained in flue gas. The most amount of NOx is represented by nitric oxide (NO), however
other oxide, as nitrogen dioxide (NO2) or nitrous oxide (N2O), take only few percent of NOx (Dvořák, et al., 2010).
Desired reactions between NOx and urea solution is Eq(1) and Eq(2) (Dvořák et al., 2010). If temperature in
dosing zones reaches out of temperature window undesired reactions Eq(3), Eq(4), Eq(5) proceed (Kanniche
et al., 2011). Urea doesn’t react when temperature is below range and causes ammonia slip. Over the range
reductant burns and the amount of NOx increases.
4 𝑁𝑂 + 4 𝑁𝐻3 + 3 𝑂2 → 4 𝑁2 𝑂 + 6 𝐻2 𝑂 (3)
Please cite this article as: Gal P., Jecha D., Jícha J., Stehlík P., 2017, Selective non-catalytic reduction (sncr) and its efficiency with respect to
various combustion parameters, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 56, 1915-1920 DOI:10.3303/CET1756320
1916
4 𝑁𝐻3 + 5 𝐻2 𝑂 → 4 𝑁𝑂 + 6 𝐻2 𝑂 (4)
4 𝑁𝐻3 + 3 𝑂2 → 𝑁2 + 6 𝐻2 𝑂 (5)
Limit of NOx emission for coal power plants stipulated by Czech legislation is 200 mg/mN3 (Czech Government
Regulation 352/2002 Sb.). In the present it doesn’t define any limit of ammonia slip. Acceptable value of
ammonia slip was determined under 5 mg/mN3.
250
200
[kg/h]
150
100
50
0
110 130 150 170 190 210
Steam power output [t/h]
3. Past tests
In the tests several measurements at low and high output were conducted, and when operating at marginal
temperature between zones (i.e. 1,000 °C). The assessment was based on data recorded every minute.
3.1 Comparison of injection levels at low power
At steam output of 130 t/h, the temperature was measured by the AGAM system in the temperature range
950 °C – 1,010 °C. The flue gas temperature depends significantly on the steam boiler output, fuel efficiency
and the number of currently operating GMC and partly on the number of pulverised-coal burners.
The following information shows the measurement at capacity of 130 t/h. In the first case (Figure 3(b)) are shut
down burners no. 3 and 6. The average low heat value of the fuel is 22.3 MJ/kg and the temperature is around
the value of 955 °C. The reducing agent is dosed to the zone 1. In another test bottom burners no. 1, 3 and 4
were shut down, whereby the temperature in the boiler increased. Its value is around the value of 1,008 °C and
the low heat value is 20.6 MJ/kg. Thanks to increased temperature, the reducing agent is dosed to the second
zone. The values of measured parameters are described in Figure 3(a).
250 8 12
300
7
10
200 250
6
CO; Satamin; NOx
8
CO; Satamin; NOx
150 5 200
O2; NH3 slip
4 6
150
100 3
100 4
2
50
50 2
1
0 0 0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time [min] Time [min]
(a) (b)
Figure 3: Steam boiler output of 130 t/h (a) Zone 2 (b) Zone 1
1918
Both zones meet the requirements on emission limits, but neither of them is ideal for the conditions. In the case
of dosing into zone 1 the consumption of satamin is considerably higher and uneven due to transient NO x
emissions. In zone 2 amonia slip is significant, even if the amount of dispensed satamin is more stable and
lower than in first one. The parameter values are summarised in Table 2.
20
300
18
250 16
CO; Satamin; NOx
14
O2; NH3 slip
200 12
10
150
8
100 6
4
50
2
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Time [min]
4. Conclusion
SNCR method cannot prevent generation of NOx (primary measures are used) but allows the nitrogen oxides
to reduce to less hazardous substances (H2O, CO2, N2). SNCR efficiency depends on the initial amount of NOx
in the flue gas and other gaseous elements in the boiler. The temperature most significantly affects it at the
injection point of the reducing agent. In this case it is an aqueous urea solotion - satamin.
As seen from Figure 3, the effectiveness of the technology in the dosage to the different levels at the same
performance varies. Over a suitable temperature window combustion of satamin occurs (Figure 3(b)) , while
ammonia slip increase at dosage levels below the window temperature (Figure 3(a)).
In case of significant intervention into the combustion process, flame stability and combustion instationary can
occur. Not all changes fundamentally affect the creation or reduction of NOx. The most important criterion, which
affects the combustion of the primary quantity of NOx, is the amount of combustion air. The more air (i.e. oxygen)
is fed to the boiler, the more NOx is formed. It is also obvious from the measurement, that the boiler operates at
high powers consumes less reducing agent than at lower performance. One of the reasons is different
temperature, respectively dosage at the limit of the temperature window in which the reaction is effective.
Another reason is related to the stability of combustion and with false air which enters the boiler through
leakages. At high capacity this air is consumed for combustion of fuel and does not significantly affect the NO x
formation. With lower power there is not enough fuel in the boiler, it would react with. In the area of heating
boiler a large amount of air will remain, from which thermal NOx is formed, which will increase the overall
formation of primary NOx.
CO value indicates the quality of combustion. In the case of high concentrations of CO, the combustion is
incomplete. When the steam output of 200 t/h (Figure 4) a sharp increase of CO occured twice. In both cases,
it was caused by the opening of coal feeder during the boiler control. A large amount of cold air was sucked
while opening during the process, which cooled combustion air and deteriorated combustion conditions to
increased CO. Once measured CO exceeds the limit, the controller increases the oxygen from air intake above
the calculated (stoichiometric) value. This will increase the primary NO x. After checking and closing feeder, CO
value returns to its original level. The reaction rate of the oxygen regulator is slower (several minutes). During
regular control, there is a constant increase of oxygen in the combustion process and thus the greater formation
of primary NOx and greater consumption of dosed satamin.
Operation at temperatures of 950 °C to 1,000 °C (output of 133 t/h - 150 t/h) is challenging to determine the
appropriate dosage zones for the reducing agent. When dosed to level 2 there is a large ammonia slip, because
the flue gas temperature is lower than the optimum for the SNCR (Figure 3(a) and Figure 5). At level 1, the
temperature is too high and a portion of the reducing agent is burned, thereby the concentrations of NO x increase
(Figure 3(b) and Figure 5). A big problem was caused by incorrect setting of the controller for dosing a reducing
agent, which in case of power loss below 138 t/h increased satamin flow into the boiler, despite nitrogen oxides
were decreasing (e.g. Figure 7, 60 min). This caused a significant increase in ammonia slip. Optimising this
controller not only based on performance but also by the output or NOx by ammonia slip, accurate dosing of the
reducing agent into the flue gas can be achieved.
Currently, operation optimisation with respect to the primary measures NOx SNCR is taking place in the K14
boiler, so that the required NOx values below 200 mg/mN3 would be kept.
Acknowledgments
The results of this project NETME CENTRE PLUS (LO1202) were co-funded by the Ministry of Education, Youth
and Sports within the support programme „National Sustainability Programme I“. The authors also gratefully
acknowledge financial support of the project Waste-to-Energy (WtE) Competence Centre no. TE02000236 and
management at coal-fired power station in Ostrava-Třebovice.
Reference
Czech Government Regulation No. 354/2002.
European IPPC Bureau, Reference Document on the Best Available Techniques in Common Waste Water and
Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical Sector, European IPPC Bureau, Brussels,
Belgium. <eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/CWW_Final_Draft_07_2014.pdf>, accessed
26.02.2016.
Dvořák R., Chlápek P., Jecha D., Puchýř R. and Stehlík P., 2010, New approach to common removal of dioxins
and NOx as a contribution to environmental protection, Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (9), 881-888.
Kanniche M., Mourigal M., Gros S., 2011, Modeling of NOx selective catalytic reduction in pulverised coal power
plants, Chemical Engineering Transactions 25, 671 – 676.