0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views6 pages

Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) and Its Efficiency With Respect To Various Combustion Parameters

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views6 pages

Selective Non-Catalytic Reduction (SNCR) and Its Efficiency With Respect To Various Combustion Parameters

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

1915

A publication of

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING TRANSACTIONS


VOL. 56, 2017 The Italian Association
of Chemical Engineering
Online at www.aidic.it/cet
Guest Editors: Jiří Jaromír Klemeš, Peng Yen Liew, Wai Shin Ho, Jeng Shiun Lim
Copyright © 2017, AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.,
ISBN 978-88-95608-47-1; ISSN 2283-9216 DOI: 10.3303/CET1756320

Selective Non-catalytic Reduction (SNCR) and its Efficiency


with Respect to Various Combustion Parameters
Pavel Gal*, David Jecha, Jaroslav Jícha, Petr Stehlík
Institute of Process and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology,
Technická 2, 616 69 Brno, Czech Republic
[email protected]

Nitrogen oxides, which are formed for example during the combustion process in coal power plants, have
negative impact on the environment. It is one of the main components of greenhouse gases and together with
sulfur oxides cause acid rains. When reducing the formation and discharge of nitrogen oxides, it is possible to
proceed several technological processes. One of the methods that is used in practice for reducing these
pollutants, is selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR). Increasingly stringent emission limits forcing businesses
to invest in a system for removing NOx. SNCR method is one of the cheapest, but sufficiently effective alternative
to achieve these levels.
This contribution describes the experimental tests of injecting a reducing agent into the flue gas stream. In this
case a reducing agent (with the trade name Satamin) consisting of an aqueous urea solution and an additives.
The tests were performed in the boiler K14 at the power plant in Ostrava - Třebovice, CZ. The aim of the tests
was to reduce NOx emissions achieved by primary measures (e.g., adjusting the pressure of the boiler unit, low
NOx pulverised coal burners, change media for grinding mill circuits) so that the flue gas at the outlet reaches
approximately 190 mg/mN3, because NOx emission limit specified by legislation is established to 200 mg/mN3.
Efficiency SNCR was determined based on the conversion rate of Satamin and the associated reduction of
primary NOx to a final value measured at a chimney. The contribution shows and compares the impact of various
factors (the concentration of CO in the flue gas stream, the primary value of NO x, the temperature in the
combustion chamber, etc.) that affect, positively or negatively, the reaction process of Satamin and NO x
according to the equations (Dvořák, et al., 2010):
4 𝑁𝑂 + 2 (𝑁𝐻2 )2 𝐶𝑂 + 2 𝐻2 𝑂 + 𝑂2 → 4 𝑁2 + 6 𝐻2 𝑂 + 2 𝐶𝑂2 (1)
6 𝑁𝑂2 + 4 (𝑁𝐻2 )2 𝐶𝑂 + 4 𝐻2 𝑂 → 7 𝑁2 + 12 𝐻2 𝑂 + 4 𝐶𝑂2 (2)

1. Introduction
Selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) is one of the denitrification methods, which belongs to the secondary
measures. Operation costs of SNCR are lower than SCR and also efficiency is very different. Average efficiency
for SCR is about 92 % (with fixed bed catalytic reactor), however for SNCR is mostly about 55 % (European
IPPC Bureau, 2014). It depends on boiler condition and significantly on temperature at level of dosing reducing
agents (e.g. ammonia and urea). Suitable range of temperature is called temperature window. Reduction by
applying urea is usually done in ranging from 950 °C to 1,050 °C (European IPPC Bureau, 2014).
Urea reacts with NOx contained in flue gas. The most amount of NOx is represented by nitric oxide (NO), however
other oxide, as nitrogen dioxide (NO2) or nitrous oxide (N2O), take only few percent of NOx (Dvořák, et al., 2010).
Desired reactions between NOx and urea solution is Eq(1) and Eq(2) (Dvořák et al., 2010). If temperature in
dosing zones reaches out of temperature window undesired reactions Eq(3), Eq(4), Eq(5) proceed (Kanniche
et al., 2011). Urea doesn’t react when temperature is below range and causes ammonia slip. Over the range
reductant burns and the amount of NOx increases.
4 𝑁𝑂 + 4 𝑁𝐻3 + 3 𝑂2 → 4 𝑁2 𝑂 + 6 𝐻2 𝑂 (3)

Please cite this article as: Gal P., Jecha D., Jícha J., Stehlík P., 2017, Selective non-catalytic reduction (sncr) and its efficiency with respect to
various combustion parameters, Chemical Engineering Transactions, 56, 1915-1920 DOI:10.3303/CET1756320
1916

4 𝑁𝐻3 + 5 𝐻2 𝑂 → 4 𝑁𝑂 + 6 𝐻2 𝑂 (4)

4 𝑁𝐻3 + 3 𝑂2 → 𝑁2 + 6 𝐻2 𝑂 (5)
Limit of NOx emission for coal power plants stipulated by Czech legislation is 200 mg/mN3 (Czech Government
Regulation 352/2002 Sb.). In the present it doesn’t define any limit of ammonia slip. Acceptable value of
ammonia slip was determined under 5 mg/mN3.

2. Boiler unit and combustion process


Measurements were carried out in the boiler K14, which is part of the production block of power plant Třebovice.
It is a steam coal boiler (hard coal) with a dry bottom furnace. Steam boiler capacity is 110 t/h to 220 t/h. The
outlet temperature and pressure is 535 °C and 10.89 MPa.
2.1 Description of boiler unit
Coal dust is prepared in two grinding mill circuits (GMC) for burning. Milling circuits are independent on each
other. Boiler system consists of 18 burners (Figure 1) - 12 pulverised-coal burners (numbers 1-12), 2 start-up
and stabilising burners and 4 waste-vapour burners (A - D). Pulverised-coal burners are located at the corners
of the boiler unit in three levels. Waste-vapour burners lead into the boiler waste vapours (preheated air
containing particles dedusted in cyclones), which are dosed between the middle and upper level of the
pulverised-coal burner (see Figure 1). Stability of the flame is checked by 8 pyrometers disposed between the
upper and middle levels of burners. Additional air is delivered into the fireplace. These are called over fire air -
OFA, which is important in terms of NOx reduction.

Figure 1: Placement of burners and SNCR method in boiler unit

2.2 Description of flue gas cleaning


Part of the gas cleaning system except SNCR technology is also electrostatic precipitator and DeSOx
technology to eliminate emissions of SO2, which is implemented by dosing sorbent into the flue gas. In the
combustion chamber (at a height of 18.3 m) is the flue gas temperature measured using the AGAM system
(acoustic gas temperature measurement) with six sensors. Measuring emissions of NH 3 slip is implemented by
a diode laser spectrometer (LDS 6). As emissions are measured before entry into the chimney, ammonia can
be partially dissociated on the filter in the form of salts. Despite the value of NH 3 slip is one indicator of the
effectiveness of SNCR technology.
The reducing agent may be dosed into one of two zones, which are at a height of 18 m and 24.3 m above the
furnace. There are six nozzles in each layer (three on the right and left side of the boiler). The reduction mixture,
consisting of demineralised water and satamin (40 % an aqueous urea solution), is in the nozzle to enlarge the
interphase interfaces broken atomising air to fine drops. At the ends of the nozzles special angled nozzles are
installed, which with their design regulate drops trajectory. Thanks to this change, the reducing agent gets in
lower flue gas temperature and achieves better conversion of chemical reaction.
Switching between zones is automated based on steam output or the temperature in the combustion chamber.
Limits for switching to individual layers are described in Table 1. The level switches when the current value of
the output or the temperature exceeds the limit. In the transition area reduction takes place from both levels.
During the tests only switching zones according to temperature was used. The final adjustment will be made in
optimising the operation.
1917

Table 1: Switching output and temperature


Steam boiler output Temperature AGAM Number of dosing level
145 t/h 1,000 °C 2
120 t/h 950 °C 1

2.3 Estimated curve dosing the reducing agent


Dosage of satamin is not linear. At low and high outputs are the consumptions the highest (see Figure 2). When
the capacity is low, it is more difficult to maintain the stability of the flame inside the boiler, which causes uneven
NOx production in time. The main factors affecting convergence of satamin and nitrogen oxides is the oxygen
concentration and temperature in the combustion chamber. Increasing the concentration of oxygen in the
combustion process negatively affects the formation of primary NOx, which must be further reduced.
300
Injection of satamin

250
200
[kg/h]

150
100
50
0
110 130 150 170 190 210
Steam power output [t/h]

Figure 2: Dosing of satamin for different steam output

3. Past tests
In the tests several measurements at low and high output were conducted, and when operating at marginal
temperature between zones (i.e. 1,000 °C). The assessment was based on data recorded every minute.
3.1 Comparison of injection levels at low power
At steam output of 130 t/h, the temperature was measured by the AGAM system in the temperature range
950 °C – 1,010 °C. The flue gas temperature depends significantly on the steam boiler output, fuel efficiency
and the number of currently operating GMC and partly on the number of pulverised-coal burners.
The following information shows the measurement at capacity of 130 t/h. In the first case (Figure 3(b)) are shut
down burners no. 3 and 6. The average low heat value of the fuel is 22.3 MJ/kg and the temperature is around
the value of 955 °C. The reducing agent is dosed to the zone 1. In another test bottom burners no. 1, 3 and 4
were shut down, whereby the temperature in the boiler increased. Its value is around the value of 1,008 °C and
the low heat value is 20.6 MJ/kg. Thanks to increased temperature, the reducing agent is dosed to the second
zone. The values of measured parameters are described in Figure 3(a).
250 8 12
300
7
10
200 250
6
CO; Satamin; NOx

8
CO; Satamin; NOx

O2; NH3 slip

150 5 200
O2; NH3 slip

4 6
150
100 3
100 4
2
50
50 2
1

0 0 0 0
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Time [min] Time [min]
(a) (b)

Figure 3: Steam boiler output of 130 t/h (a) Zone 2 (b) Zone 1
1918

Both zones meet the requirements on emission limits, but neither of them is ideal for the conditions. In the case
of dosing into zone 1 the consumption of satamin is considerably higher and uneven due to transient NO x
emissions. In zone 2 amonia slip is significant, even if the amount of dispensed satamin is more stable and
lower than in first one. The parameter values are summarised in Table 2.

Table 2: Average values of experiment with low output


Zone Temperature NH3 slip Satamin NOx CO O2
1 955 °C 0.01 mg/mN3 205.4 kg/h 169.6 mg/mN3 27.69 mg/mN3 4.83 %
2 1,008 °C 3.11 mg/mN3 168.5 kg/h 170.6 mg/mN3 54.64 mg/mN3 4.03 %

3.2 Test of the steam capacity of 200 t/h


Steam output of 200 t/h is operated with all pulverised-coal burners and usually with both GMC. The temperature
ranges from 1,045 °C – 1,110 ° C. Nitrogen oxides are reduced by injecting the reducing agent into the level 2.
In the performance two separate tests were done with a time delay of eight hours.
The first measurement was carried out with small changes in output and temperature (1,043 °C – 1,087 °C)
without significant interference in the combustion process. The quantity of dispensed satamin was stabilised
after 12 min at a value 64.47 kg/h (lowest possible flow when valve is opened to 1 %). Under these conditions
there was negligible ammonia slip. NOx emissions were stabilised at 162 mg/ mN3 (see Table 3).
Figure 4 corresponds to the second measurement. Despite dosing double amount of the solution into the flue
gas NOx concentration did not decrease, but was slightly higher than in the first case (127 kg/h, 169 mg/mN3). It
can be concluded that the conditions in the boiler are different (i.e. combustion quality or concentration of
elements). In the flue gas O2 concentration increased by 0.4 % compared to the first measurement. At the same
time the concentration of CO, which is an indicator of combustion quality, was decreased by 14 mg/mN3. Due to
the increased excess air more thermal NOx is created, more satamin is consumed to its reduction.
During measurement, there were two external intervention into the combustion process, which significantly
influenced the reduction of NOx. Opening the coal feeder because of its cleaning in 16 and 73 minute a large
amount of air penetrated into the boiler space, which sharply increased the concentration of CO. Part of the
boiler is an oxygen controller, which in case of increasing the CO concentration increases the amount of
combustion air. During the huge increase of CO, the O2 will increase, thereby the concentration of primary NOx
is increased. After closing feeder and decrease the concentration of CO is gradually reducing the amount of air
and after some time, the process stabilises. Manually lowering the oxygen regulator to the level before the
external intervention can speed up stabilisation. Exhaust gas oxygen concentration at end of test fell to a value
of the first measurement. NOx emissions were around 151 mg/mN3. Ammonia slip was not detected. Table 3
shows the average values of the investigated parameters. If the case of CO concentration is due to achieve
extreme concentration in the second test the median is given instead of the average value.

Table 3: Average values of experiment with high output


Experiment Temperature NH3 slip Satamin NOx CO O2
1 1,066 °C 0.12 mg/mN3 66.1 kg/h 159.8 mg/mN3 42.55 mg/mN3 1.85 %
2 1,008 °C 0.00 mg/mN3 143.0 kg/h 165.5 mg/mN3 35.69 mg/mN3 2.01 %

20
300
18
250 16
CO; Satamin; NOx

14
O2; NH3 slip

200 12
10
150
8
100 6
4
50
2
0 0
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Time [min]

Figure 4: Steam boiler output of 200 t/h


1919

3.3 Automatic switching levels at temperature about 1,000 °C


As mentioned in the introduction, the zones were changed during tests according to the temperature. As the
temperature in the boiler depends on many factors, it is not possible to accurately determine the switching
performance. It is assumed that the temperature of 1,000 °C will be achieved about output of 140 t/h.
The test was carried out in the range of output of 133 t/h to 149 t/h and at temperatures between 935 °C and
1,049 °C. It is obvious from the large range of temperatures, that dosing zone was changed during the
measurements. The test sequence is recorded in Figure 5. The curves showing the satamin dose, concentration
of NOx and ammonia slip value show that even at times when the ammonia slip increases, and the NO x
decreases, the amount of satamin dosed into the flue gas increases. This effect is not desirable and it is caused
by wrong setting of the reducing agent which, when power loss is below 138 t/h, adds a huge amount of satamin
injected into the flue gas.
The test started in operation of both GMC and without pulverised-coal burners no. 4 and 6. The initial
performance of 145 t/h corresponded to the temperature 990 °C. Satamin dosed to level 2. The quantity of
satamin decreased at the beginning, because the value of NOx was kept deep below the limit. At first amplitudes
of satamin (in 45 minutes) its value increased of 89 kg/h to 299 kg/h. There are several factors that influenced
this increase. Apart from a slight increase in the oxygen concentration in the boiler and the associated increase
primary NOx, steam output decreased to the value of 133 t/h. Satamin reacts with flue gas only partially, and a
large part as unreacted goes further into the flue gas cleaning system and through chimney to the atmosphere.
The measured ammonia slip reached 6.25 mg/m N3. Not all amplitudes are related to the capacity. In 89 minute
the operating level changed. There was a decrease in NO x and ammonia slip. Satamin started spraying to a
zone with high temperature where it was probably burned and responded to NO x. Due to growing NOx, the
satamin flow began to rise. In 134 min the temperature exceeded 1,000 °C and operational zone became level
2. Measured parameters began to stabilise.
Intervention in the boiler, in the form of removing GMC 142 in 250 min, firstly caused decrease of NO x (due to
increased concentration of CO) and a subsequent sharp increase in the concentration of these oxides.
Subsequently, the burner no. 1 was removed. It was observed from previous measurements on the same device
that the shutdown of the burners on the bottom surface favorably influences the concentration of NOx. Similar
situation is during operation at both GMC, when under the same conditions lower values are reached for the
primary NOx than when operating with one GMC or without them.
Another short-term switching levels occurred between 330 and 342 min. Ammonia slip again decreased to a
minimum, but due to the high temperature, satamin occurred to combust together with the increase in nitrogen
oxides. After switching to zone 2, the values (satamin, NOx, ammonia slip) returned to the level before switching
zones. After replacing the burners (burner shutdown no. 3 and rise burner no. 6) began to decrease gradually.
The boiler at the time was run without MLO 142 and without burners no. 1, 3 and 4.

Figure 5: Steam boiler output about 140 t/h


1920

4. Conclusion
SNCR method cannot prevent generation of NOx (primary measures are used) but allows the nitrogen oxides
to reduce to less hazardous substances (H2O, CO2, N2). SNCR efficiency depends on the initial amount of NOx
in the flue gas and other gaseous elements in the boiler. The temperature most significantly affects it at the
injection point of the reducing agent. In this case it is an aqueous urea solotion - satamin.
As seen from Figure 3, the effectiveness of the technology in the dosage to the different levels at the same
performance varies. Over a suitable temperature window combustion of satamin occurs (Figure 3(b)) , while
ammonia slip increase at dosage levels below the window temperature (Figure 3(a)).
In case of significant intervention into the combustion process, flame stability and combustion instationary can
occur. Not all changes fundamentally affect the creation or reduction of NOx. The most important criterion, which
affects the combustion of the primary quantity of NOx, is the amount of combustion air. The more air (i.e. oxygen)
is fed to the boiler, the more NOx is formed. It is also obvious from the measurement, that the boiler operates at
high powers consumes less reducing agent than at lower performance. One of the reasons is different
temperature, respectively dosage at the limit of the temperature window in which the reaction is effective.
Another reason is related to the stability of combustion and with false air which enters the boiler through
leakages. At high capacity this air is consumed for combustion of fuel and does not significantly affect the NO x
formation. With lower power there is not enough fuel in the boiler, it would react with. In the area of heating
boiler a large amount of air will remain, from which thermal NOx is formed, which will increase the overall
formation of primary NOx.
CO value indicates the quality of combustion. In the case of high concentrations of CO, the combustion is
incomplete. When the steam output of 200 t/h (Figure 4) a sharp increase of CO occured twice. In both cases,
it was caused by the opening of coal feeder during the boiler control. A large amount of cold air was sucked
while opening during the process, which cooled combustion air and deteriorated combustion conditions to
increased CO. Once measured CO exceeds the limit, the controller increases the oxygen from air intake above
the calculated (stoichiometric) value. This will increase the primary NO x. After checking and closing feeder, CO
value returns to its original level. The reaction rate of the oxygen regulator is slower (several minutes). During
regular control, there is a constant increase of oxygen in the combustion process and thus the greater formation
of primary NOx and greater consumption of dosed satamin.
Operation at temperatures of 950 °C to 1,000 °C (output of 133 t/h - 150 t/h) is challenging to determine the
appropriate dosage zones for the reducing agent. When dosed to level 2 there is a large ammonia slip, because
the flue gas temperature is lower than the optimum for the SNCR (Figure 3(a) and Figure 5). At level 1, the
temperature is too high and a portion of the reducing agent is burned, thereby the concentrations of NO x increase
(Figure 3(b) and Figure 5). A big problem was caused by incorrect setting of the controller for dosing a reducing
agent, which in case of power loss below 138 t/h increased satamin flow into the boiler, despite nitrogen oxides
were decreasing (e.g. Figure 7, 60 min). This caused a significant increase in ammonia slip. Optimising this
controller not only based on performance but also by the output or NOx by ammonia slip, accurate dosing of the
reducing agent into the flue gas can be achieved.
Currently, operation optimisation with respect to the primary measures NOx SNCR is taking place in the K14
boiler, so that the required NOx values below 200 mg/mN3 would be kept.

Acknowledgments

The results of this project NETME CENTRE PLUS (LO1202) were co-funded by the Ministry of Education, Youth
and Sports within the support programme „National Sustainability Programme I“. The authors also gratefully
acknowledge financial support of the project Waste-to-Energy (WtE) Competence Centre no. TE02000236 and
management at coal-fired power station in Ostrava-Třebovice.

Reference
Czech Government Regulation No. 354/2002.
European IPPC Bureau, Reference Document on the Best Available Techniques in Common Waste Water and
Waste Gas Treatment/Management Systems in the Chemical Sector, European IPPC Bureau, Brussels,
Belgium. <eippcb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/reference/BREF/CWW_Final_Draft_07_2014.pdf>, accessed
26.02.2016.
Dvořák R., Chlápek P., Jecha D., Puchýř R. and Stehlík P., 2010, New approach to common removal of dioxins
and NOx as a contribution to environmental protection, Journal of Cleaner Production 18 (9), 881-888.
Kanniche M., Mourigal M., Gros S., 2011, Modeling of NOx selective catalytic reduction in pulverised coal power
plants, Chemical Engineering Transactions 25, 671 – 676.

You might also like