The Expression of Recreational Facilities in Theme-Based

Parks of India: Comparison over view of NCR with case

studies of Global Parks
Synopsis submitted to faculty of
Architecture & Ekistics

For the partial fulfilment for the award of the degree of

Master of Architecture

LITERATURE REVIEW
SUBMITTED BY
PANKAJ KUMAR

Under the Supervision of

Dr AYLA KHAN
AR ZAI-UDDIN
FACULTY OF ARCHITECTURE AND EKISTICS,
JAMIA MILLIA ISLAMIA NEW DELHI
PIN -110025
Introduction
Theme-based parks have become vital centers of entertainment and cultural expression,
particularly in countries like India where urbanization and economic growth are driving
demand for recreational spaces. This study explores the expression of recreational facilities
in Indian theme parks, focusing on the National Capital Region (NCR) and comparing them
with notable global examples. The analysis includes specific case studies: Wonder of Waste
(Sarai Kale Khan), Kingdom of Dreams (Gurugram), and Ved Van Park (Noida), alongside
global counterparts such as Disneyland (USA), Universal Studios (USA), and Efteling
(Netherlands).

Understanding Theme Parks

Theme parks are specialized recreational spaces that create immersive environments based
on specific themes, ranging from fairy tales and films to cultural motifs. Key characteristics
include:
 Thematic Attractions: Rides and experiences that align with the overarching theme.
 Entertainment Offerings: Live shows, parades, and character interactions that
enhance the visitor experience.
 Themed Dining and Retail: Restaurants and shops that complement the park's
narrative.
 Environmental Design: Landscaping and architecture that reflect the theme and
enhance immersion.

Recreational Facilities in Indian Theme Parks:

Wonder of Waste (Sarai Kale Khan)
 Overview: This park focuses on environmental education and sustainability,
providing a unique recreational experience that promotes awareness about waste
management and recycling.
 Facilities:
o Educational Exhibits: Interactive installations demonstrating waste
segregation and recycling processes.
o Workshops and Activities: Programs designed for families and schools to
engage in eco-friendly practices.
o Play Areas: Themed play spaces that incorporate natural elements and
recycled materials.
 Visitor Experience: Aims to instill environmental responsibility while offering fun and
engaging activities. The park serves as both a recreational area and a learning
platform, appealing to eco-conscious families and school groups.
Kingdom of Dreams (Gurugram)
 Overview: A cultural extravaganza that showcases India’s rich heritage through live
performances, music, and dance.
 Facilities:
o Theatrical Performances: Grand productions that highlight various aspects of
Indian culture, from classical dance to contemporary performances.
o Culinary Experiences: Multiple dining options featuring regional cuisines,
enhancing the cultural immersion.
o Shopping Areas: Stores offering traditional handicrafts and souvenirs.
 Visitor Experience: The park offers a blend of entertainment and cultural education,
attracting both local and international tourists. The grand architecture and thematic
design create an enchanting atmosphere that emphasizes India’s artistic legacy.

Ved Van Park (Noida)

 Overview: Focused on nature and wellness, this park offers a serene environment for
relaxation and education about biodiversity.
 Facilities:
o Nature Trails: Walking paths surrounded by diverse flora and fauna,
promoting eco-tourism.
o Wellness Programs: Activities such as yoga sessions and workshops on
sustainable living.
o Educational Displays: Informational panels about local ecosystems and
wildlife.
 Visitor Experience: Appeals to nature lovers and families seeking a peaceful retreat
from urban life. The park encourages outdoor activities and promotes awareness of
environmental conservation.

Comparative Analysis with Global Theme Parks:

Disneyland (USA)
 Overview: The archetype of theme parks, known for its storytelling and immersive
experiences.
 Facilities:
o Themed Lands: Distinct areas like Fantasyland and Adventureland, each with
unique rides and attractions.
o Character Meet-and-Greets: Opportunities for visitors to interact with
beloved Disney characters.
 o Parades and Shows: Spectacular events that draw on Disney narratives and
music.
 Visitor Experience: Focuses on nostalgia and emotional connections, ensuring
visitors leave with memorable experiences.

Universal Studios (USA)

 Overview: A park that brings films to life through rides and attractions based on
popular movies.
 Facilities:
o Thrill Rides: High-adrenaline experiences that immerse visitors in cinematic
universes (e.g., Harry Potter, Jurassic Park).
o Interactive Experiences: Attractions that allow guests to participate in movie-
making processes.
o Live Shows: Entertainment that showcases stunts and special effects.
 Visitor Experience: Combines entertainment with technology, appealing to a wide
demographic, including film enthusiasts and families.

Efteling (Netherlands)
 Overview: A theme park inspired by fairy tales and folklore, known for its immersive
storytelling and natural beauty.
 Facilities:
o Themed Rides: Attractions designed around classic fairy tales, with a focus on
immersive storytelling.
o Nature Integration: Beautifully landscaped gardens and natural settings
enhance the park's magical atmosphere.
o Cultural Events: Seasonal events that celebrate various traditions and
folklore.
 Visitor Experience: Offers a blend of adventure and tranquility, appealing to families
seeking an enchanting experience.

Key Differences and Similarities

 Cultural Representation: Indian parks like Kingdom of Dreams prioritize local cultural
narratives, while global parks often leverage broader themes and advanced
technologies.
 Visitor Experience: Disneyland and Universal Studios focus on high-tech immersive
experiences, whereas Indian parks are increasingly engaging visitors through cultural
and environmental themes.
  Investment and Infrastructure: Global parks generally have more substantial
financial backing, allowing for cutting-edge attractions, while Indian parks are still
developing in terms of infrastructure and investment.

Challenges Faced by Indian Theme Parks

 Infrastructure Development: Limited financial resources can restrict the scope and
quality of attractions.
 Cultural Sensitivity: Striking a balance between modern entertainment trends and
local traditions is often challenging.
 Competition: Parks must innovate continuously to remain appealing amidst various
entertainment options, including multiplexes and recreational centers.

Emerging Trends in Theme Parks

 Technological Integration: Increasing use of VR and AR technologies to enhance
visitor engagement and create immersive experiences.
 Sustainability Practices: Parks like Wonder of Waste lead the way in promoting eco-
friendly initiatives and educational programs on environmental conservation.
 Thematic Diversity: Expanding the variety of themes to include contemporary
cultural influences and global narratives.

Economic Impact
Theme parks significantly impact local and national economies by generating employment,
boosting tourism revenue, and supporting local businesses. They create thousands of jobs,
from entry-level positions to management roles, while attracting millions of visitors who
spend on tickets, food, and merchandise, benefiting nearby restaurants and shops. Parks like
Kingdom of Dreams enhance regional tourism and drive infrastructure improvements, such
as better transportation. However, challenges like high initial investments and competition
from other entertainment options exist. Overall, theme parks serve as vital economic
engines that foster local growth and development.

Future Prospects
The future landscape of theme parks in India, especially in the NCR, is poised for growth,
with potential developments in:
 Enhanced Visitor Engagement: Personalized experiences leveraging technology to
cater to individual preferences.
 Cultural Festivals and Events: Increased frequency of events that celebrate regional
culture, which can attract diverse audiences.
 Public-Private Partnerships: Collaborations aimed at improving infrastructure and
attracting investments that can elevate park offerings.
Conclusion
The expression of recreational facilities in theme-based parks in India, particularly in the
NCR, showcases a unique intersection of local culture and modern entertainment trends.
While Indian parks draw inspiration from global examples, they are developing distinct
identities that reflect regional values and experiences. The ongoing advancements in
technology and sustainability practices are likely to shape the future of theme parks in India,
enhancing their appeal and relevance in a rapidly changing entertainment landscape.

References
 Beaty, R. E. (2010). The Theme Park: A Critical History. New York: Routledge.
 Dorsey, D. M. (2018). Theme Park and Entertainment Facility Management. New
York: Pearson.
 Kumar, S. (2019). Cultural Representation in Theme Parks: The Case of Kingdom of
Dreams. Journal of Tourism and Cultural Change, 17(3), 345-359.
 Ministry of Environment and Forests. (2021). Ved Van Park: Promoting Eco-Tourism in
Urban Areas. New Delhi: Government of India.
 National Council of Applied Economic Research (NCAER). (2022). Economic Impact of
Theme Parks in India. New Delhi: NCAER.
 Arai, S. & Kaczynski, A. T. (2008). Influences of Park Maintenance and Recreational
Opportunities on Visitor Satisfaction. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration,
26(4), 1-20.
 Dempsey, S. (2017). The Role of Technology in Enhancing Park Management and
Visitor Experience. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 21, 107-113.
 Colding, J. (2011). The Role of Urban Green Spaces in Building Social Cohesion.
Environmental Science & Policy, 14(6), 811-819.
 Floyd, M. F. (2000). The Influence of Emotional Connections to Nature on Visitor
Satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research, 32(4), 457-475.
 Gobster, P. H. (2002). Managing Urban Parks for Social Cohesion. Landscape Journal,
21(1), 27-38.
 Gordon, J., et al. (2019). Social Equity in Urban Parks: Access and Quality Disparities.
Journal of Urban Affairs, 41(3), 381-397.
 Rojas, C., et al. (2017). Recreational Uses of Urban Parks: Implications for Community
Health. Environmental Research Letters, 12(11), 1-8.
 Thwaites, K. & Simkins, I. (2007). Designing Public Parks: A Landscape Approach.
Landscape and Urban Planning, 80(2), 103-114.
 Tzoulas, K., et al. (2007). Promoting Ecosystem and Human Health in Urban Areas
Using Green Infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Management, 84(2), 227-238.