Seventh Edition

Principles of
Economics

Wojciech Gerson (1831-1901)

N. Gregory Mankiw

CHAPTER The Theory of

11 Consumer Choice
In this chapter,
look for the answers to these questions

• How does the budget constraint represent the

choices a consumer can afford?
• How do indifference curves represent the
consumer’s preferences?
• What determines how a consumer divides her
resources between two goods?
• How does the theory of consumer choice explain
decisions such as how much a consumer saves,
or how much labor she supplies?
Introduction
▪ Recall one of the Ten Principles from Chapter 1:
People face tradeoffs.
▪ Buying more of one good leaves
less income to buy other goods.
▪ Working more hours means more income and
more consumption, but less leisure time.
▪ Reducing saving allows more consumption
today but reduces future consumption.
▪ This chapter explores how consumers make
choices like these.

2
The Budget Constraint:
What the Consumer Can Afford
▪ Example:
Hurley divides his income between two goods:
fish and mangos.
▪ A “consumption bundle” is a particular combination
of the goods, e.g., 40 fish & 300 mangos.
▪ Budget constraint: the limit on the consumption
bundles that a consumer can afford

3
ACTIVE LEARNING 1
The budget constraint
Hurley’s income: $1200
Prices: PF = $4 per fish, PM = $1 per mango
A. If Hurley spends all his income on fish,
how many fish does he buy?
B. If Hurley spends all his income on mangos,
how many mangos does he buy?
C. If Hurley buys 100 fish, how many mangos can
he buy?
D. Plot each of the bundles from parts A – C on a
graph that measures fish on the horizontal axis
and mangos on the vertical, connect the dots.
ACTIVE LEARNING 1
Answers D. Hurley’s budget
Quantity constraint shows
of Mangos the bundles he can
B
A. $1200/$4 afford.
= 300 fish
B. $1200/$1 C
= 1200
mangos
C. 100 fish
cost $400,
$800 left
buys 800 A
mangos Quantity
of Fish
 The Slope of the Budget Constraint
From C to D, Quantity The slope of the
of Mangos budget constraint
“rise” =
equals the relative
–200 mangos
price of the good
“run” = on the X axis.
+50 fish C

Slope = – 4 D
Hurley must
give up
4 mangos
to get one fish.

Quantity
of Fish
ACTIVE LEARNING 2
Budget constraint, continued
Show what happens to Hurley’s budget constraint if:
A. His income falls to $800.
B. The price of mangos rises to
PM = $2 per mango
ACTIVE LEARNING 2
Answers, part A
Quantity A fall in income
Now, of Mangos shifts the budget
Hurley constraint down.
can buy
$800/$4
= 200 fish
or
$800/$1
= 800 mangos
or any
combination in
between. Quantity
of Fish
ACTIVE LEARNING 2
Answers, part B
Hurley Quantity An increase in the
of Mangos price of one good
can still buy
300 fish. pivots the budget
constraint inward.
But now he
can only buy
$1200/$2 =
600 mangos.
Notice:
slope is smaller,
relative price of
fish is now only
2 mangos. Quantity
of Fish
Preference: What consumers want
Preference:judgments made by consumers on various
types of G&S provided by the society
three basic preferences of rational consumers
Completeness：either X1<X2; or X1=X2; or X1>X2
Transitivity：If X1>X2, X2>X3→X1>X3
Unsaturation:prefer more than less.

10
 Preferences: What the Consumer Wants
Indifference curve: Quantity One of Hurley’s
shows consumption of Mangos indifference curves
bundles that give the
consumer the same
level of satisfaction
B
A, B, and all other
bundles on I1 make A
Hurley equally happy:
I1
he is indifferent
between them.
Quantity
of Fish
11
Four Properties of Indifference Curves

Quantity One of Hurley’s

1. Indifference curves of Mangos indifference curves
are downward-
sloping.

If the quantity of
fish is reduced, B

the quantity of
A
mangos must be
I1
increased to keep
Hurley equally
happy. Quantity
of Fish
12
Four Properties of Indifference Curves

Quantity A few of Hurley’s

2. Higher indifference of Mangos indifference curves
curves are preferred
to lower ones.

Hurley prefers every

bundle on I2 (like C) C
D
to every bundle on I1
A I2
(like A).
I1
He prefers every
bundle on I1 (like A) I0
to every bundle on I0 Quantity
(like D). of Fish
13
Four Properties of Indifference Curves

Quantity Hurley’s
3. Indifference curves of Mangos indifference curves
cannot cross.
Suppose they did.
Hurley should prefer
B to C, since B has B
more of both goods.
Yet, Hurley is indifferent C A
between B and C: I1 I4
He likes C as much as A
(both are on I4).
He likes A as much as B Quantity
of Fish
(both are on I1).
14
Four Properties of Indifference Curves

Quantity
4. Indifference curves of Mangos
are bowed inward.

A
Hurley is willing to give
up more mangos for a 6
fish if he has few fish
1
(A) than if he has
B
many (B). 2
1 I1

Quantity
of Fish
15
The Marginal Rate of Substitution

Marginal rate of Quantity MRS = slope of

substitution (MRS): of Mangos indifference curve
the rate at which a consumer
is willing to trade one good for A
another.
MRS = 6
Hurley’s MRS is the
amount of mangos he 1
would substitute for B
MRS = 2
another fish. 1 I1
MRS falls as you move
down along an Quantity
indifference curve. of Fish
16
One Extreme Case: Perfect Substitutes
Perfect substitutes: two goods with
straight-line indifference curves,
constant MRS
Example: nickels and dimes
Consumer is always willing to trade
two nickels for one dime.

17
Another Extreme Case: Perfect Complements
Perfect complements: two goods with
right-angle indifference curves
Example: Left shoes, right shoes
{7 left shoes, 5 right shoes}
is just as good as
{5 left shoes, 5 right shoes}

18
 Less Extreme Cases:
Close Substitutes and Close Complements

Quantity Indifference Quantity Indifference

of Pepsi curves for close of hot curves for
dog buns close
substitutes are
not very bowed complements
are very
bowed

Quantity Quantity
of Coke of hot dogs19
Optimization: What the Consumer Chooses
A is the optimum: Quantity
The optimum
the point on the of Mangos
is the bundle
budget constraint
Hurley most
that touches the
1200 prefers out of
highest possible
all the bundles
indifference curve.
he can afford.
Hurley prefers B to A, B
but he cannot afford B. 600
A

Hurley can afford C C

and D, D
but A is on a higher
indifference curve. 150 300 Quantity
of Fish
20
Optimization: What the Consumer Chooses
Quantity
At the optimum, of Mangos Consumer
slope of the optimization is
indifference curve another example
equals 1200 of “thinking at the
slope of the budget margin.”
constraint:
MRS = PF/PM A
600

marginal
price of fish
value of fish
(in terms of
(in terms of
mangos)
mangos) 150 300 Quantity
of Fish
21
The Effects of an Increase in Income
Quantity
of Mangos
An increase in
income shifts the
budget constraint
outward.
B
If both goods are
A
“normal,” Hurley
buys more of each.

Quantity
of Fish
22
ACTIVE LEARNING 3
Inferior vs. normal goods
▪ An increase in income increases the quantity
demanded of normal goods and reduces the
quantity demanded of inferior goods.
▪ Suppose fish is a normal good
but mangos are an inferior good.
▪ Use a diagram to show the effects of
an increase in income on Hurley’s optimal
bundle of fish and mangos.
ACTIVE LEARNING 3
Answers Quantity
of Mangos

If mangos are
inferior, the new
optimum will
contain fewer
mangos.
A
B

Quantity
of Fish
The Effects of a Price Change
Initially, Quantity
of Mangos
PF = $4
1200
PM = $1 initial
optimum

PF falls to $2 new
optimum
budget constraint 600
rotates outward, 500
Hurley buys
more fish and
fewer mangos.
150 300 600 Quantity
350 of Fish

25
The Income and Substitution Effects
A fall in the price of fish has two effects on
Hurley’s optimal consumption of both goods.
▪ Income effect
A fall in PF boosts the purchasing power of Hurley’s
income, allows him to buy more mangos and more
fish.
▪ Substitution effect
A fall in PF makes mangos more expensive relative
to fish, causes Hurley to buy fewer mangos and
more fish.
Notice: The net effect on mangos is ambiguous.
26
The Income and Substitution Effects
Initial Quantity In this example,
optimum at A. of Mangos
the net effect
PF falls. on mangos is
negative.
Substitution effect:
from A to B,
buy more fish and A
fewer mangos. C

Income effect: B
from B to C,
buy more of both
Quantity
goods.
of Fish

27
ACTIVE LEARNING 4
The substitution effect in two cases
Do you think the substitution effect would be
bigger for substitutes or complements?
▪ Draw an indifference curve for Coke and Pepsi,
and, on a separate graph, one for hot dogs and
hot dog buns.
▪ On each graph, show the effects of a relative
price change (keeping the consumer on the initial
indifference curve).
ACTIVE LEARNING 4
Answers
ButInthe substitution
both graphs, theeffect is bigger
relative pricefor substitutes
changes
bythan
the complements.
same amount.
Quantity
of Pepsi Quantity of
hot dog buns

A
B B

Quantity Quantity
of Coke of hot dogs
 Deriving Hurley’s Demand Curve for Fish
A: When
B: When PPFF == $2,
$4, Hurley
Hurley demands
demands 350
150 fish.
fish.

Quantity Price of
of Mangos Fish

A
$4
A
B
B
$2
DFish

150 350 Quantity 150 350 Quantity

of Fish of Fish
30
Application 1: Giffen Goods
▪ Do all goods obey the Law of Demand?
▪ Suppose the goods are potatoes and meat,
and potatoes are an inferior good.
▪ If price of potatoes rises,
▪ substitution effect: buy less potatoes
▪ income effect: buy more potatoes
▪ If income effect > substitution effect,
then potatoes are a Giffen good, a good for which
an increase in price raises the quantity demanded.

31
Application 1:
Giffen Goods

32
Application 2: Wages and Labor Supply
Budget constraint
▪ Shows a person’s tradeoff between consumption
and leisure.
▪ Depends on how much time she has to divide
between leisure and working.
▪ The relative price of an hour of leisure is the amount
of consumption she could buy with an hour’s wages.
Indifference curve
▪ Shows “bundles” of consumption and leisure
that give her the same level of satisfaction.

33
Application 2: Wages and Labor Supply
At the optimum,
the MRS between
leisure and
consumption
equals the wage.

34
Application 2: Wages and Labor Supply

An increase in the wage has two effects

on the optimal quantity of labor supplied.
▪ Substitution effect (SE): A higher wage makes
leisure more expensive relative to consumption.
The person chooses less leisure,
i.e., increases quantity of labor supplied.
▪ Income effect (IE): With a higher wage,
she can afford more of both “goods.”
She chooses more leisure,
i.e., reduces quantity of labor supplied.
35
Application 2: Wages and Labor Supply
For this person, So her labor supply
SE > IE increases with the wage

36
Application 2: Wages and Labor Supply
For this person, So his labor supply falls
SE < IE when the wage rises

37
Could This Happen in the Real World???
Cases where the income effect on labor supply is
very strong:
▪ Over last 100 years, technological progress has
increased labor demand and real wages.
The average workweek fell from 6 to 5 days.
▪ When a person wins the lottery or receives an
inheritance, his wage is unchanged—hence no
substitution effect.
But such persons are more likely to work fewer
hours, indicating a strong income effect.

38
 Application 3: Interest Rates and Saving
▪ A person lives for two periods.
▪ Period 1: young, works, earns $100,000
consumption = $100,000 minus amount saved
▪ Period 2: old, retired
consumption = saving from Period 1
plus interest earned on saving
▪ The interest rate determines
the relative price of consumption when young
in terms of consumption when old.

39
 Application 3: Interest Rates and Saving
Budget constraint shown is for 10% interest rate.

At the optimum,
the MRS between
current and future
consumption equals
the interest rate.

40
ACTIVE LEARNING 5
A change in the interest rate
▪ Suppose the interest rate rises.
▪ Describe the income and substitution effects on
current and future consumption, and on saving.
ACTIVE LEARNING 5
Answers
The interest rate rises.
Substitution effect
▪ Current consumption becomes more expensive
relative to future consumption.
▪ Current consumption falls, saving rises,
future consumption rises.
Income effect
▪ Can afford more consumption in both the present
and the future. Saving falls.
Application 3: Interest Rates and Saving
In this case,
SE > IE and
saving rises

43
Application 3: Interest Rates and Saving
In this case,
SE < IE and
saving falls

44
CONCLUSION:
Do People Really Think This Way?
▪ People do not make spending decisions
by writing down their budget constraints and
indifference curves.
▪ Yet, they try to make the choices that maximize
their satisfaction given their limited resources.
▪ The theory in this chapter is only intended as a
metaphor for how consumers make decisions.
▪ It explains consumer behavior fairly well in many
situations and provides the basis for more
advanced economic analysis.
45
Summary
• A consumer’s budget constraint shows the
possible combinations of different goods she can
buy given her income and the prices of the
goods. The slope of the budget constraint
equals the relative price of the goods.
• An increase in income shifts the budget
constraint outward. A change in the price of one
of the goods pivots the budget constraint.
Summary
• A consumer’s indifference curves represent her
preferences. An indifference curve shows all the
bundles that give the consumer a certain level of
happiness. The consumer prefers points on
higher indifference curves to points on lower
ones.
• The slope of an indifference curve at any point is
the marginal rate of substitution—the rate at
which the consumer is willing to trade one good
for the other.
Summary
• The consumer optimizes by choosing the point
on her budget constraint that lies on the highest
indifference curve. At this point, the marginal
rate of substitution equals the relative price of
the two goods.
• When the price of a good falls, the impact on the
consumer’s choices can be broken down into
two effects, an income effect and a substitution
effect.
Summary
• The income effect is the change in consumption
that arises because a lower price makes the
consumer better off. It is represented by a
movement from a lower indifference curve to a
higher one.
• The substitution effect is the change that arises
because a price change encourages greater
consumption of the good that has become
relatively cheaper. It is represented by a
movement along an indifference curve.
Summary
• The theory of consumer choice can be applied in
many situations. It can explain why demand
curves can potentially slope upward, why higher
wages could either increase or decrease labor
supply, and why higher interest rates could
either increase or decrease saving.