Handle Customer Complaint
Handle Customer Complaint
Handle Customer Complaint
December, 2023
Ads Ababa, Ethiopia
Customer complaints refer to when a business does not deliver on its commitment and does not
meet customer expectations in terms of the product or services. The vital aspect of every
business is its clients. For greater success, businesses need more satisfied clients. And the best
way to obtain new clients and maintain the existing ones is by providing them with satisfactory
service. But how to understand whether your customers are happy or unhappy?
They also have the highest likelihood of leaving and unsubscribing from your
product.Types of dissatisfied customers:
An angry customer is convinced that your company neither cares nor listens to them.
An unhappy customer feels that your product failed to meet their expectations.
A. Complaints preference
Preference is generally given to complaints identifying:-
systemic (structural or procedural) deficiencies in public administration.
sensitive issues which are unlikely to be (or be seen to be) properly addressed by the agencies
concerned (due to such factors as the seniority of the staff the subject of the allegations,
conflicts of interest on the part of the agency or its senior staff, significant sensitivity, etc), or
Serious maladministration or detrimental action as defined in the Public Interest Disclosures
Act 1994.
Types of complaints
(1) Public Multi-Media Complaint:
Public multimedia has the reach of millions of people. If your customer takes his/her
complaint to say Facebook, Twitter these platforms have the reachability to all those who are
following your social media accounts.
Failure to address such complaints put a negative impression on the current as well as on the
potential customers of the company.A company should have enough trained people to handle
their social media accounts and complaints should be sent to the related departments.
To do so, first of all, the customer should be asked to provide contact information and
contacted to get more details about the problem. secondly, the customer should be asked
politely to take down the complaint after solving it. Public media has given the power in the
hands of customers, now, the management has to, listen to the complaints and solve them
quickly to run a successful business.
2) Serial Complaint:
A customer loses his trust in the company if his complaint is not addressed when asked
repeatedly. Therefore, serial complaints must be handled quickly. Fixing such problems
reduces the work for the future altogether. However, working on such complaints is good for
the company because these complaints help to make the service better and also gives room to
the management for introspection and improvement.
On the other hand, a company should narrow down customers who complaints frequently
about every other thing and find smart ways to deal with them.
A stakeholder is a party that has an interest in a company and can either affect or be affected
by the business. The primary stakeholders in a typical corporation are its investors,
employees, customers, and suppliers.
Business stakeholders any person, group of people or other organization that has an interest
in the activities of a business. Businesses need to be aware of their stakeholders, as many of
them will be affected by its activities. Stakeholders can also influence the decisions that a
business makes. A stakeholder is any person or entity that has an interest in a business or
project.
Customers Government.
Investors Consider expectations.
Employees Manage
Local community expectation
Suppliers and partners
Ways to effectively communicate with your stakeholders
Stakeholder management
Internal Stakeholders are all the people (or groups of people) who are involved in the project
and are influenced by the company’s operations. Such examples of stakeholders include
employees, managers, board members, and company owners.
They often need to possess top communication and relationship management skills to ensure that:
The stakeholders will vary depending on the organization and the type of project to be
undertaken. Identifying all of them will be the first key task on your agenda.
Documenting means showing where you got source information that's not your own.
Remember, a research paper blends your ideas with ideas and information from other
sources. It means backing it up with as much provable fact or information -
documentation - as possible.
Documentation shows the reader what ideas are yours and what information and ideas
you've taken from a source to support your point of view.
That the action or condition or policy you're complaining about actually happened or
exists
That the action or condition or policy in question was intentional, or at least that those
responsible for it knew, or should have known, its consequences, or known that it was
illegal or unethical
That a particular individual or entity was or is responsible for the action or condition or
policy in question
That you or others actually had particular experiences or conversations
That someone was actually harmed or otherwise negatively affected by the action or
condition or policy in question
The particular physical, social, economic, health, psychological, environmental, or other
results of the action or condition or policy in question
Your own credentials, or those of any experts you consult or cite
The most important reason to document a complaint is that already mentioned: regulatory
agencies, courts, and ombuds persons need evidence in order to sort out the reality of a situation.
(That's why we have trials - so that the judge or jury can figure out who's telling the truth.)
There are other compelling reasons to provide careful documentation for any complaint, such as:
It establishes you as a credible witness. In other words, it shows you're telling the truth.
It establishes that you were concerned enough to pay attention .
It may determine whether or not your complaint is taken seriously.
As should be obvious by now, anyone who wants to file or register a complaint should document
it. If you think there's a problem, you need evidence to convince others that that's the case. There
are some people, however, whose documentation may be particularly important.
The great approach about documenting complaints is that - as you often find out later - you
should start before you realize you have a complaint. In fact, there are some specific times when
it makes sense to gather evidence.
When you're seeking evidence to bring before a regulatory body or court. This is
perhaps the situation in which there is the clearest need for documentation.
When you're looking for facts to back up advocacy for or against legislation or policy.
The first step in documenting a complaint understands what kind of documentation you'll need. It
will vary, depending upon whom you're registering the complaint with. Once you've settled that
question, you then have to make a plan for collecting the documentation, and actually do it.
You may be complaining to an official body - a regulatory agency, a labor union, the personnel
department of a company - or you may be taking your complaint public in some way.
Most regulatory bodies, businesses, institutions, and organizations have some sort of official
complaint or grievance procedure. If you're using such a procedure, make sure you know it cold,
and follow it carefully.
Submit the complaint to the proper entity, and to the proper department or individual
within the entity.
Submit the complaint within the time limits imposed by the procedure. There may be
time limits involved (the statute of limitations, for instance, or fiscal year considerations).
Submit the complaint in the proper form. You may have to record the complaint on an
actual form generated by the oversight body, or the complaint may have to be notarized.
Find out exactly what documentation is necessary for the official body to act on the
complaint, and make sure you have it.
Unless you're going through something like an official corporate or organizational grievance
procedure - in which case, you should follow the instructions above - you'll need documentation
that's both specific enough and powerful enough to convince the entity to change its ways. That
may mean proof that it's been doing something illegal, or close to illegal, or simply enough
evidence that what it's doing is harmful that it would prefer not to have to face public pressure on
the issue. In either case, your documentation will need to include specifics - dates, times, places,
people involved, exactly what happened - to make it clear that there's really no room to slide out
of the situation.
In order to gain cooperation in this circumstance, your initial approach should probably be low-
key and cooperative in itself. Rather than "We've caught you red-handed," a friendlier "We all
want to make sure this situation is corrected; let's work together on it" might be more effective.
You can always get tough later, if it becomes clear that the entity doesn't want to cooperate.
Just as in the two instances above, the media will want documentation of the specifics of the
complaint, but they'll need some other support as well.
The second is that, while a reporter can be of help to you, there's no guarantee that she will be.
Her job is to get the whole story, and she may be convinced by your opponents' arguments.
Whenever you work with the media, that's a chance you have to take. That's all the more reason
to make sure that your documentation is complete, correct, and convincing.
Finally, find out the appropriate person to bring your story to. In the words of a New York Times
reporter, "I would recommend that people read/watch local newspapers and news shows
carefully enough to know WHO would be most interested in their stories. Selling an educational
outrage story to the reporter who covers retail marketing is a waste of time for all concerned. (I
get a lot of this - when flacks call now, I ask, before they can start their pitch, if they know what
I cover. Ifthey don't know, and they then ask 'Well, who does cover widgets?' I know that they
are mindlessly cold-calling reporters from some list they have been given.)"
As we discussed earlier, any time you're involved in an advocacy situation that may develop into
a complaint, you should be collecting documentation from the very beginning. It's not always
possible to anticipate, but if you have any inkling that a complaint is possible, act on it.
Know any relevant laws or regulations inside out. Learn as much as you can about the science,
sociology, psychology, economics, or politics involved, as well as the history of the issue.
After background, you'll need specifics. These are the nitty-gritty facts of the situation that may,
in fact, be extremely important in getting your complaint resolved.
If the complaint concerns the violation of a law or regulation, for instance, be sure to explain
which law or regulation is at issue, and exactly what elements of it were violated. (And be sure
you know and understand the details of the law or regulation.) If there’s no specific violation,
then define and explain your complaint as fully as possible. Your complaint should state both
what is occurring that you think is unacceptable, and what you think would be acceptable.
Be specific, including as much detail as possible, and for as many incidents as possible. The
step-by-step sequence of events for each incident (as well as the sequence of incidents) may be
important.
It's important to document exchanges with everyone involved - this includes not only the target
of the complaint, but also regulators and officials, those affected by the actions or policies you're
complaining about, and anyone else related to the issue. If you can, get conversations, or at least
the important parts of them, word-for-word.
There are several types of consequences you might be concerned with, and consequences might
come from a single policy or action, from repeated actions over time, or from an unrelated series
of careless or intentionally harmful policies or actions by the same entity over time.
References
1. (Blithe,J (2001) Essentials of Marketing 2nd bed, Ashefoldcolor press, Hampsire).
2. Bennet, A. (2010). The Big Book of Marketing. New York, NY, USA: McGraw Hill.
3. Boone, L., Kurtz, D. (1992). "Contemporary Marketing". Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press.
4. Kenneth E. Clow, (2003). Integrated Advertising Promotion and Marketing. 2nd Edition,
New Delhi.
5. Kotler, P. (1997), Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and
Control, 9th ed., Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, .
6. Kotler, P. and Armstrong, G. (2006) Principles of Marketing (Version 12/E) Pearson
Education Inc. New Jersey
7. McCarthy, E.J. (1960), "Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach", Richard D. Irwin,
Homewood, IL.