Full Download Essentials of Criminal Justice 5th Edition Larry J. Siegel PDF
Full Download Essentials of Criminal Justice 5th Edition Larry J. Siegel PDF
Full Download Essentials of Criminal Justice 5th Edition Larry J. Siegel PDF
com
https://ebookname.com/product/essentials-of-criminal-
justice-5th-edition-larry-j-siegel/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWLOAD NOW
https://ebookname.com/product/essentials-of-criminal-justice-
eleventh-edition-larry-j-siegel/
https://ebookname.com/product/introduction-to-criminal-
justice-13th-edition-larry-j-siegel/
https://ebookname.com/product/introduction-to-criminal-
justice-16th-ed-edition-larry-j-siegel/
https://ebookname.com/product/criminology-the-core-4th-edition-
larry-j-siegel/
Juvenile Delinquency The Core 4th Edition Larry J.
Siegel
https://ebookname.com/product/juvenile-delinquency-the-core-4th-
edition-larry-j-siegel/
https://ebookname.com/product/criminology-theories-patterns-and-
typologies-tenth-edition-larry-j-siegel/
https://ebookname.com/product/criminal-justice-in-action-the-
core-9th-edition-larry-k-gaines/
https://ebookname.com/product/juvenile-delinquency-theory-
practice-and-law-10th-edition-larry-j-siegel/
https://ebookname.com/product/criminology-in-canada-theories-
patterns-and-typologies-6th-edition-larry-j-siegel/
Thinking of a career in criminal justice?
These resources can help steer you toward
the choice that’s right for you.
Careers in Criminal Justice and Related Fields:
From Internship to Promotion
Fifth Edition
by J. Scott Harr, Concordia University Saint Paul, and Kären M. Hess,
Normandale Community College
0-534-62620-3. 320 pages. Paperbound. 8 1/2 x 11.
This book provides all the information you need to enter the field of criminal justice—
from finding a criminal justice internship all the way to determining the right profession
for you in the criminal justice system. With the help of this interesting book, you’ll learn
effective job-search strategies, internship requirements, professional conduct, creating
résumés, what to expect in interviews, and how to locate job openings.
Larry J. Siegel
University of Massachusetts–Lowell
Joseph J. Senna
Northeastern University
Australia •Brazil •Canada •Mexico •Singapore •Spain •United Kingdom •United States
Senior Acquisitions Editor, Criminal Justice: Carolyn Permissions Editor: Kiely Sisk
Henderson Meier Production Service: Linda Jupiter, Jupiter Productions
Development Editor: Shelley Murphy Text Designer: Lisa Delgado
Assistant Editor: Jana Davis Photo Researcher: Linda Rill
Editorial Assistant: Rebecca Johnson Copy Editor: Lunaea Weatherstone
Technology Project Manager: Susan DeVanna Proofreader: Mary Kanable
Marketing Manager: Terra Schultz Illustrator: John and Judy Waller, Scientific Illustrators
Marketing Assistant: Jaren Boland Indexer: Paula C. Durbin-Westby
Marketing Communications Manager: Linda Yip Cover Designer: Yvo
Project Manager, Editorial Production: Jennie Redwitz Cover Illustration: Sally Wern Comport
Creative Director: Rob Hugel Cover Printer: Phoenix Color Corp
Art Director: Vernon Boes Compositor: Pre-Press Company, Inc.
Print Buyer: Barbara Britton Text Printer: Courier Corporation/Kendallville
© 2007 Thomson Wadsworth, a part of The Thomson Cor- Thomson Higher Education
poration. Thomson, the Star logo, and Wadsworth are 10 Davis Drive
trademarks used herein under license. Belmont, CA 94002-3098
USA
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. No part of this work covered
by the copyright hereon may be reproduced or used in
any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or me- For more information about our products, contact us at:
chanical, including photocopying, recording, taping, web Thomson Learning Academic Resource Center
distribution, information storage and retrieval systems, or 1-800-423-0563
in any other manner—without the written permission of
the publisher. For permission to use material from this text or
product, submit a request online at
Printed in the United States of America http://www.thomsonrights.com.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 09 08 07 06 Any additional questions about permissions can be
submitted by e-mail to
[email protected].
ExamView® and ExamView Pro® are registered trade-
marks of FSCreations, Inc. Windows is a registered trade-
mark of the Microsoft Corporation used herein under
license. Macintosh and Power Macintosh are registered Dedication
trademarks of Apple Computer, Inc. Used herein under
To my children, Eric, Andrew, Julie, and Rachel;
license.
my grandchildren, Kayla and Jack;
and to my wife, Therese J. Libby.
© 2007 Thomson Learning, Inc. All Rights Reserved. LARRY J. SIEGEL
Thomson Learning WebTutor™ is a trademark of
Thomson Learning, Inc. To my children, Joseph, Peter, Stephen, and Christian,
and to my wife, Janet.
JOSEPH J. SENNA
ISBN 0-495-00602-5
About the Authors
LARRY J. SIEGEL was born in the Bronx in 1947. While attending City College
of New York in the 1960s, he was swept up in the social and political
currents of the time. He became intrigued with the influence contemporary
culture had on individual behavior: Did people shape society or did society
shape people?He applied his interest in social forces and human behavior
to the study of crime and justice. After graduating CCNY, he attended the
newly opened program in criminal justice at the State University of New
York at Albany, earning both his M.A. and Ph.D. degrees there. After
completing his graduate work, Dr. Siegel began his teaching career at North-
eastern University, where he was a faculty member for nine years. He has
also held teaching positions at the University of Nebraska–Omaha and Saint
Anselm College in New Hampshire. He is currently a professor at the
University of Massachusetts–Lowell.
Dr. Siegel has written extensively in the area of crime and justice, includ-
ing books on juvenile law, delinquency, criminology, and criminal procedure.
He is a court certified expert on police conduct and has testified in numerous
legal cases. The father of four and grandfather of two, Larry Siegel and his
wife, Terry, now reside in Bedford, New Hampshire, with their two cockapoos,
Watson and Cody.
JOSEPH J. SENNA was born in Brooklyn, New York. He graduated from Brook-
lyn College, Fordham University Graduate School of Social Service, and Suf-
folk University Law School. Mr. Senna spent over sixteen years teaching law
and justice courses at Northeastern University. In addition, he served as an
assistant district attorney, director of Harvard Law School Prosecutorial
Program, and consultant to numerous criminal justice organizations. His
academic specialties include areas of criminal law, Constitutional due
process, criminal justice, and juvenile law.
Mr. Senna lives with his wife and sons outside of Boston.
Brief Contents
Part 1
THE NATURE OF CRIME, LAW, AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE 1
Part 2
THE POLICE AND LAW ENFORCEMENT 121
Part 3
COURTS AND ADJUDICATION 217
Part 4
CORRECTIONS AND ALTERNATIVE SANCTIONS 325
Part 5
JUVENILE JUSTICE 417
iv
Contents
Preface xii How Is Crime Measured? 34
Record Data 34
Part 1 Official Crime Data: The Uniform Crime Report
(UCR) 35
THE NATURE OF CRIME, LAW, AND Survey Data 36
CRIMINAL JUSTICE 1 Victim Surveys: The National Crime
Victimization Survey (NCVS) 37
Self-Report Surveys 38
CHAPTER 1 Alternative Data Sources 39
Crime and Criminal Justice 2 Compatibility of Crime Data Sources 40
Is Crime a Recent Development? 4 Crime Trends 40
Crime at the Turn of the Twentieth Century 5 Victim Rates and Trends 42
Developing the Criminal Justice System 6 Self-Report Trends 43
The Modern Era of Justice 6 Policy, Programs, and Issues in Criminal Justice:
Federal Involvement in Criminal Justice 6 Factors That Have an Impact on Crime Rates 44
The Criminal Justice System Today 7 What the Future Holds 46
Agencies of the Criminal Justice System 7 Crime Patterns 46
The Formal Criminal Justice Process 9 Ecological Patterns 46
The Criminal Justice Assembly Line 12 Race, Culture, and Gender in Criminal Justice:
International Crime Trends 47
The Informal Criminal Justice System 12
Gender Patterns 48
The “Wedding Cake” Model of Justice 14
Racial Patterns 48
Perspectives on Justice 16 Class Patterns 49
Crime Control Perspective 16 Age Patterns 50
Rehabilitation Perspective 17 Career Patterns: The Chronic Offender 51
Due Process Perspective 18 Victim Patterns 52
Nonintervention Perspective 19
Causes of Crime and Victimization 54
Policy, Programs, and Issues in Criminal Justice:
Choice Theory: Because They Want To 54
Should Drugs Be Legalized? 20
Sociobiological Theory: It’s in Their Blood 55
Justice Perspective 22
Psychological Theory: It’s in Their Heads 57
Restorative Justice Perspective 22
Social Structure Theory: Because They’re Poor 58
Perspectives in Perspective 24
Social Process Theory: Socialized to Crime 60
Ethics in Criminal Justice 24 Conflict Theory: It’s a “Dog-Eat-Dog” World 62
Ethics and Law Enforcement 25 Developmental Theory: Life Is a Bumpy Road 63
Ethics and the Court Process 26 A Final Word 63
Ethics and Corrections 27
Summary 65
Summary 28 Key Terms 65
Key Terms 29 Review Questions 65
Review Questions 29
CHAPTER 2 CHAPTER 3
The Nature of Crime and Victimization 30 Criminal Law: Substance and
How Is Crime Defined? 32 Procedure 66
Consensus View 32 The Historical Development of the Criminal Law 68
Conflict View 33 Common Law and the Principle of Stare
Interactionist View 33 Decisis 70
v
vi CONTENTS
xi
Preface
O
n April 21, 2004, a grand jury indicted Michael Jackson—the “King of
Pop”—on ten felony counts, setting off one of the most highly publi-
cized cases of the decade. Among the charges:
• 1 count of attempting a lewd act upon a minor (3 to 5 years)
• 4 counts of lewd acts involving a minor under the age of 14 (each count
carries a mandatory sentence of 3 to 8 years)
• 4 counts of administering an intoxicating agent (each count carries the
potential for a 16-month to 3-year sentence)
• 1 conspiracy count involving 28 separate acts, including child abduction,
false imprisonment, and extortion (2 to 4 years plus a $
10,000 fine)
The prosecution, led by Santa Barbara District Attorney Tom Sneddon,
claimed that Jackson sexually molested a teenage boy between February and
March of 2003 at his famed Neverland Ranch. During the trial, the prosecu-
tion attempted to paint Jackson as a pedophile who routinely provided kids
with liquor and wine (which Jackson allegedly called “Jesus Juice”), showed
them pornographic films, shared his bed with them, and, most damaging,
engaged in frequent bouts of sexual molestation. Jackson’s legal defense retal-
iated by painting the accuser and his family as greedy opportunists who con-
cocted a story to extort money from a millionaire celebrity. They claimed that
the alleged victim was controlled by his mother, who was intent on taking ad-
vantage of Jackson’s generosity and love of children. Rather than a molester,
Jackson was an innocent, childlike adult who, if anything, was simply too lav-
ish in his affection for needy kids.
In one bizarre twist, the boy’s mother claimed that Jackson had held the
family hostage in the wake of the television broadcast of “Living with Michael
Jackson”(BBC News, February 4, 2003), during which Jackson admitted to
British interviewer Martin Bashir that he had slept in the same bed with
young boys. At one point in the documentary Jackson is seen with his 13-year-
old accuser, who rests his head on Jackson’s shoulder and talks enthusiasti-
cally about the singer. The accuser’s mother claimed that Jackson’s fear of the
impact the documentary would have on the public drove him and his staff to
intimidate and restrain the family—at which point the media became an
actual player in the case rather than just an outside reporter of what was
happening.
And the trial itself quickly turned into a media circus. Reporters arrived
from around the world. Actors recreated court testimony on nightly entertain-
ment programs, celebrities were served with subpoenas, a gag order was
placed on comedian Jay Leno, and so on. The turning point in the case may
have come on May 11, 2005, when former child actor Macaulay Culkin denied
that Jackson molested him when he spent time at the Neverland Ranch.
Culkin’s testimony reassured jurors that Jackson was not an evil predator; it
was particularly important to counterbalance testimony that Jackson had
paid millions to other boys in prior molestation cases. On June 13, 2005, the
jury found Jackson not guilty of the charges, ending one of the most bizarre
cases in the annals of American jurisprudence.
PREFACE xiii
ORGANIZATION
Essentials of Criminal Justice is divided into five parts. Part One gives the stu-
dent a basic introduction to crime, law, and justice. The first chapter covers the
agencies of justice and the formal justice process, as well as introducing
students to the informal justice system, which involves discretion, deal-making,
and plea bargains. Chapter 1 also discusses the major perspectives on justice
and shows how they shape justice policy. Chapter 2 discusses the nature and
extent of crime and victimization: How is crime measured?Where and when
does it occur?Who commits crime?Who are its victims?What social factors
xiv PREFACE
Chapter-by-Chapter Changes
• Chapter 1, Crime and Criminal Justice. This chapter has been stream-
lined and reorganized to provide a more manageable introduction to
criminal justice. In particular, the discussion of perspectives of justice has
been rewritten to provide a more concise overview, and the discussion of
the wedding cake model of justice is more succinct than in previous edi-
tions. This chapter also features a new section on ethics in criminal jus-
tice, which looks at the ethical dilemmas facing police, prosecutors, and
PREFACE xv
court protection orders can reduce the incidence of repeat violence. New
programs discussed include Santa Barbara’s Elder Abuse Unit and
Mason County, Washington’s effort to have fees paid to fund crime
victim programs. There is a new Policy, Programs, and Issues in
Criminal Justice box titled “Ethical Issues in Defense: Should Defense
Attorneys Tell the Truth?”and the court technology material includes a
new section on information sharing.
• Chapter 9, Pretrial Procedures. Coverage of the role prosecutors play in
plea bargaining has been updated, as has coverage of recent efforts to re-
duce plea negotiations in serious felonies. The chapter contains a recent
study indicating that bail may be racially or ethnically biased and that
African-American and Hispanic defendants receive less favorable treat-
ment than whites charged with similar offenses. Finally, research on the
types of offenders who succeed in pretrial programs has been added.
• Chapter 10, The Criminal Trial. A new section on the right to be compe-
tent at trial details research on the conditions necessary for a person to be
considered mentally incompetent. The section on the level of proof
needed for conviction has been updated, and there is additional material
on the presentation of evidence at a criminal trial. New research focusing
on racism and jury selection is included and there is analysis of a recent
federal case in which the courts refused to extend the right of the press to
attend deportation hearings.
• Chapter 11, Punishment and Sentencing. This chapter reviews a num-
ber of important cases, including Blakely v. Washington, in which the
Supreme Court concluded that Washington state’s sentencing guidelines
were a violation of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment rights; United States v.
Booker, which held that the federal guidelines were unconstitutional; and
Roper v. Simmons (2005), in which the Supreme Court set 18 years as the
age at which a defendant can be sentenced to death. The Race, Culture,
and Gender in Criminal Justice box “Race and Sentencing”has also
been updated to include recent research that finds that on average African
Americans receive 20 percent longer sentences than whites.
• Chapter 12, Community Sentences: Probation, Intermediate Sanc-
tions, and Restorative Justice. This chapter looks at the explosive
growth of probation, the use of probation abroad, and new restorative jus-
tice techniques in alternative sanctions. It covers recent research that
shows—surprisingly—that males convicted of sexual offenses seem to do
quite well on probation. Also covered is Maryland’s HotSpot probation
initiative. And we even devote some time to Jennifer Wilbanks, the notori-
ous “runaway bride,”and her sentence to intermediate sanctions. Finally,
a Race, Culture, and Gender in Criminal Justice box looks at R “ estora-
tive Cautioning in England.”
• Chapter 13, Corrections: History, Institutions, and Populations. This
chapter includes updated discussion of trends in correctional populations
and shows how sentencing changes influence corrections. Also included
is new material on ultra-maximum-security prisons and another look at
the increasingly important issue of elderly inmates.
• Chapter 14, Prison Life: Living in and Leaving Prison. This chapter
features new material on prisoner re-entry and parole as well as a new
Policy, Programs, and Issues in Criminal Justice box on “Therapeutic
Communities”and a Race, Culture, and Gender in Criminal Justice
box on “Monitoring High-Risk Offenders in New Z ealand.”There is new
material on sexual assault in prisons, and the Prison Rape Reduction Act
of 2003 is covered in some detail.
PREFACE xvii
• Chapter 15, Juvenile Justice. The final chapter of the book has been
thoroughly revised and updated. The new book Juvenile Justice in the
Making, by historian David Tanenhaus, is discussed and a new exhibit sets
out Hawaii’s Family Court project. Also covered in this chapter are the
Fast Track Project, a national juvenile treatment effort, and the Children
at Risk (CAR)program, a highly regarded rehabilitation effort.
LEARNING TOOLS
We have created a comprehensive, proven learning system designed to help
students get the most out of their first course in criminal justice. In addition
to the many changes already mentioned, we have included a wealth of new
photographs to appeal to visual learners and make material more relevant and
meaningful. Carefully updated tables and figures highlight key chapter con-
cepts. New “Learning Objectives”sections appear at the start of every chapter
to help students chart their course, while new “Concept Summaries”appear
throughout the chapters to enable students to check their understanding of
key concepts as they work. Marginal definitions of key terms, concise,
bulleted end-of-chapter summaries, and a comprehensive end-of-book glos-
sary all help students master the material, and Internet research links appear-
ing in the text’s margins let students explore topics further via the Web.
We have also included a number of thematic boxes to highlight and am-
plify text coverage and introduce students to some of the field’s most crucial
programs, policies, and issues.
Policy, Programs, and Issues in Criminal Justice These boxes help students
think critically about current justice issues, policies, and practices. Some of
the new boxes focusing on cutting-edge issues/policies include:
• Should Drugs Be Legalized?C ( h. 1)
• Ex Post Facto Laws (Ch. 3)
• Operation Atlas (Ch. 4)
• The Problem of Elderly Inmates (Ch. 13)
• Therapeutic Communities (Ch. 14)
• The Fast Track Project (Ch. 15)
Race, Culture, and Gender in Criminal Justice These boxes are aimed at
helping students achieve a better understanding of diversity concerns in the
justice system and spotlight such issues as:
• Criminal Groups/Terrorist Groups: One and the Same?C ( h. 4)
• Racial Profiling (Ch. 7)
• Restorative Cautioning in England (Ch. 12)
• Monitoring High-Risk Offenders in New Z ealand (Ch. 14)
Criminal Justice and Technology These boxes review how some of the more
recent scientific advances can aid the justice system. New technologies cov-
ered include:
• Crime Mapping C( h. 5)
• Less-than-Lethal Weapons (Ch. 7)
xviii PREFACE
SUPPLEMENTS
The most extensive package of supplemental aids available for a criminal jus-
tice text accompanies this edition. Many separate items have been developed
to enhance the course and to assist instructors and students. Available to qual-
ified adopters. Please consult your local sales representative for details.
Study Guide An extensive student guide has been developed and updated for
this edition by Lynn Newhart of Rockford College. Because students learn in
different ways, the guide includes a variety of pedagogical aids to help them,
as well as integrated art and figures from the main text. Each chapter is out-
lined and summarized, major terms and figures are defined, and self-tests are
provided.
Companion Website
http://cj.wadsworth.com/siegel_ess5e
http://info.wadsworth.com/0534615333
The book-specific website provides many chapter-specific resources: chapter
outlines, chapter summary and review, the author’s own videotaped chapter
introductions, the book glossary, flash cards, tutorial quizzing, a final exam,
ABC video clips with questions, and content-rich audio files for use with stu-
dents’ iPods. The site also features Internet exercises, InfoTrac College Edi-
tion® exercises, a discussion forum, and multi-step learning modules (Con-
cept Builders)that present key concepts with case examples followed by essay
questions in which students apply their knowledge and critical-thinking skills.
Mind of a Killer CD-ROM (bundle version) Voted one of the top 100 CD-
ROMs by an annual PC Magazine survey, Mind of a Killer gives students a
chilling glimpse into the realm of serial killers with over 80 minutes of video
and 3D simulations, and extensive mapping system, a library, and much
more.
Internet Guide for Criminal Justice, Second Edition Internet beginners will
appreciate this helpful booklet. With explanations and the vocabulary neces-
sary for navigating the Web, it features customized information on criminal
justice–related websites and presents Internet project ideas.
Internet Activities for Criminal Justice, Second Edition This completely re-
vised 96-page booklet shows how to best utilize the Internet for research
through searches and activities.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Many people helped make this book possible. Those who reviewed this fifth
edition and made suggestions that I attempted to follow to the best of my abil-
ity, as well as all those who reviewed previous editions, are as follows:
Kelly Asmussen, Peru State University
E. Elaine Bartgis, Fairmont State College
Richard Becker, North Harris County College
Joe W. Becraft, Portland Community College
Julia Foster Beeman, University of North Carolina, Charlotte
Daniel James Bell, Southwest Texas State University
Bruce Bikle, Portland State University
Michael B. Blankenship, Memphis State University
Ronald R. Brooks, Clinton Community College
Kathleen A. Cameron, Arizona State University
Stephen M. Cox, Central Connecticut State University
Paul Cromwell, Wichita State University
Chris W. Eskridge, University of Nebraska–Omaha
Tom Fields, Cape Fear Community College
Jacqueline Fitzgerald, Temple University
Janet Foster Goodwill, Yakima Valley Community College
Verna Henson, Texas State University
Kathrine Johnson, Kentucky State University
William Kelly, Auburn University
Daniel A. Klotz, Los Angeles Valley College
Pearl Jacobs, Sacred Heart University
Patricia Joffer, South Dakota State University
Mark Jones, East Carolina University
Barry McKee, Bristol Community College
Terry Miller, Valencia Community College
Donald A. Nypower, Montgomery County Community College
Gregory Russell, Arkansas State University
Gary Thompson, Monroe Community College
Cecilia Tubbs, Jefferson State Community College
Ellen F. Van Valkenburgh, Jamestown Community College
Margaret Vandiver, University of Memphis
Special thanks must also go to Kathleen Maguire and Ann Pastore, editors of
the Sourcebook of Criminal Justice; the staff at the Institute for Social
Research at the University of Michigan; and the National Criminal Justice
Reference Service.
The form and content of this new edition were directed by our terrific new
editor Carolyn Henderson Meier. It has been a pleasure working with Carolyn
and our other colleagues at Thomson Wadsworth: the delightful developmental
editor (as well as singer and drummer)Shelley Murphy; the fantastic Jennie
Redwitz, our favorite production manager; the fabulous Linda Jupiter, produc-
tion editor and personal confidante; the marvelous Linda Rill, photo
editor and friend; the captivating Terra Schultz, our marketing manager; and
Susan DeVanna, technology project manager.
Larry Siegel
Bedford, NH
PART 1
The Nature of Crime, Law,
and Criminal Justice
nationwide search began when eight-months-pregnant Laci Peter-
R
OSS WOLF’S law enforcement career began when he went
on a ride-along with a college friend who was a sheriff’s
deputy with Florida’s Orange County Sheriff’s Office (OCSO).
In the course of one shift, he found his calling. He went through an
auxiliary academy and started working as a volunteer deputy. Four
years later, he completed the course at the state of Florida Basic Law
Enforcement Academy and started working full-time for the OCSO.
After transferring to the Criminal Investigations unit he spent several
years as a detective.
Though many contemporary law enforcement officers have college
degrees, Ross’s educational experience is beyond the norm: he holds a
B.A., a master’s degree in Public Administration, and a doctoral degree
in Higher Education Administration and Leadership, all from the Univer-
sity of Central Florida in Orlando. He also has attended numerous in-
service training sessions, gaining certificates from the Florida Depart-
Chapter Outline
Is Crime a Recent Development? 4 Justice Perspective 22
Crime at the Turn of the Twentieth Century 5 Restorative Justice Perspective 22
Perspectives in Perspective 24
Developing the Criminal Justice System 6
The Modern Era of Justice 6 Ethics in Criminal Justice 24
Federal Involvement in Criminal Justice 6 Ethics and Law Enforcement 25
Ethics and the Court Process 26
The Criminal Justice System Today 7
Ethics and Corrections 27
Agencies of the Criminal Justice System 7
C
riminal justice may be viewed or defined as the system of law enforce-
ment, adjudication, and correction that is directly involved in the appre-
hension, prosecution, and control of those charged with criminal offenses.
This loosely organized collection of agencies is responsible for, among other
matters, protecting the public, maintaining order, enforcing the law, identify-
ing transgressors, bringing the guilty to justice, and treating criminal behav-
ior. The public depends on this vast system, employing more than two million
people and costing taxpayers more than $165 billion a year, to protect them
from evil-doers and to bring justice to their lives.
This text serves as an introduction to the study of criminal justice. Those
who study criminal justice typically engage in describing, analyzing, and ex-
plaining the behavior of those agencies, authorized by law and statute, to dis-
pense justice—police departments, courts, and correctional agencies—and
through their scholarly efforts, help them to identify effective and efficient
methods of crime control.
This chapter introduces some basic issues, beginning with a discussion of
the history of crime in America and the development of criminal justice. The
major organizations and criminal justice processes of the criminal justice
system are then introduced so that you can develop an overview of how the
system functions. Because there is no single view of the underlying goals that
help shape criminal justice, the varying perspectives on what criminal justice
really is or should be are set out in some detail.
© Bettmann/Corbis
At the turn of the last century, rural outlaws became mythic figures. At left are photos of the FBI’s six
most wanted men in 1934. Charles “Pretty Boy” Floyd (left photo, top right) was a folk hero among
the sharecroppers of eastern Oklahoma. Floyd robbed as many as thirty banks, filing a notch in his
pocket watch for each of the ten men he killed. Floyd was shot dead by police on October 19, 1934.
John Dillinger (left photo, top left and right photo) became the nation’s premier bank robber until he
was killed in front of a Chicago movie house on July 22, 1934. After his death, his body was put on
view at the morgue. Hordes of people came to view America’s most notorious criminal.
Gangs of New York with Daniel Day-Lewis playing the gang leader William
“Bill the Butcher” Cutting and Leonardo DiCaprio as his rival, Amsterdam
Vallon.
THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM TODAY Learn more about The Criminal
The criminal justice system is society’s instrument of social control: some be- Justice System by exploring the
Learning Module.
haviors are considered so dangerous that they must either be strictly con-
trolled or outlawed outright; some people are so destructive that they must be
monitored or even confined. It is the task of the agencies of justice to prevent
or deter outlawed behavior by apprehending, adjudicating, and sanctioning
lawbreakers. Society maintains other forms of informal social control, such
as parental and school discipline, but these are designed to deal with moral,
not legal misbehavior. Only the criminal justice system maintains the power
to control crime and punish outlawed behavior through the arm of the crimi-
nal law.
$40
383%
$30
$20
$10
$0
1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2001
Year
prison cell, and about $22,000 per year is needed to keep an inmate in prison;
juvenile institutions cost about $30,000 per year per resident.
The system is so big because it must process, treat, and care for millions
of people each year. Although the crime rate has declined substantially, about
14 million people are still being arrested each year, including more than 2 mil-
lion for serious felony offenses.8 About 1.3 million juveniles are arrested each
year and more than 1.6 million juveniles are handled by the juvenile courts
yearly (cases can be referred to juvenile court by social service agencies,
schools, parents, probation officers, and victims).9
Considering the enormous number of people processed each year, the cor-
rectional system population is at an all-time high. As Figure 1.2 shows, almost
7 million people are under the control of the correctional system, including
more than 2 million behind bars and another 4 million under some form of
community supervision. There has been a 50 percent increase in the correc-
tional population despite a decade-long drop in the crime rate.
A handcuffed student is
helped into a police car out-
side of Grady High School in
Brooklyn, New York City. Sev-
eral students from the school
who were allegedly involved in
a violent disturbance were
taken into police custody. Po-
lice have become more active
in schools since Mayor
Michael Bloomberg imple-
mented a program aimed at
reducing school violence
through the use of the NYC
police.
© Richard Cohen/Corbis
arrest in a misdemeanor, the officer must have witnessed the crime per-
sonally, known as the in-presence requirement. Arrests can also be made
when a magistrate, presented with sufficient evidence by police and pros-
ecutors, issues a warrant authorizing the arrest of the suspect.
4. Custody. After an arrest and while the suspect is being detained, the police
may wish to search for evidence, conduct an interrogation, or even encour-
age a confession. Witnesses may be brought to view the suspect in a lineup
or in a one-on-one confrontation. Because these procedures are so crucial
and can have a great impact at trial, the U.S. Supreme Court has granted
suspects in police custody protection from the unconstitutional abuse of
police power, such as illegal searches and intimidating interrogations.
in-presence requirement The 5. Charging. If the arresting officers or their superiors believe that sufficient
condition that in order to make an evidence exists to charge a person with a crime, the case will be turned
arrest in a misdemeanor, the ar-
resting officer must have person- over to the prosecutor’s office. The prosecutor’s decision to charge the sus-
ally witnessed the crime being pect with a specific criminal act involves many factors, including evidence
committed. sufficiency, crime seriousness, case pressure, and political issues, as well
nolle prosequi The term used as personal factors such as a prosecutor’s own specific interests and bi-
when a prosecutor decides to
drop a case after a complaint has ases. After conducting a preliminary investigation of its legal merits, pros-
been formally made. Reasons for ecutors may decide to take no further action in a case; this is referred to
a nolle prosequi include evidence as a nolle prosequi.
insufficiency, reluctance of wit-
nesses to testify, police error, and 6. Preliminary hearing/grand jury. The U.S. Constitution mandates that be-
office policy. fore a trial can take place, the government must first prove probable cause
grand jury A type of jury, respon- that the accused committed the crime for which he is being charged. In
sible for investigating alleged
crimes, examining evidence, and about half the states and the federal system, this determination is made
issuing indictments. by a grand jury in a closed hearing. If the prosecution can present suffi-
true bill of indictment A written cient evidence, the grand jury will issue a true bill of indictment, which
statement charging a defendant specifies the exact charges on which the accused must stand trial. In the
with the commission of a crime,
drawn up by a prosecuting attor- remaining states, the prosecution will file a charging document (usually
ney and considered by a grand called an information) before a lower trial court, which then conducts an
jury. If the grand jury finds suffi- open hearing on the merits of the case. During this procedure, sometimes
cient evidence to support the in-
dictment, it will issue a “true bill referred to as a probable cause hearing, the defendant and the defendant’s
of indictment.” attorney may appear and dispute the prosecutor’s charges. The suspect
CHAPTER 1 • CRIME AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE 11
will be called to stand trial if the presiding magistrate or judge accepts the
prosecutor’s evidence as factual and sufficient.
7. Arraignment. Before the trial begins, the defendant will be arraigned, or
brought before the court that will hear the case. At this time, formal charges
are read, the defendant informed of his constitutional rights (for example,
the right to be represented by legal counsel), an initial plea entered in the
case (not guilty or guilty), a trial date set, and bail issues considered.
8. Bail/detention. Bail is a money bond levied to ensure the return of a
criminal defendant for trial, allowing the defendant to remain in the
community prior to their trial. Defendants who do not show up for trial
forfeit their bail. Those people who cannot afford to put up bail or who
cannot borrow sufficient funds for it will remain in state custody prior
to trial. In most instances, this means an extended stay in a county jail
or house of correction. If they are stable members of the community and
have committed nonviolent crimes, defendants may be released on their
own recognizance (promise to the court), without bail.
9. Plea bargaining. After an arraignment, if not even before, the defense and
prosecution will discuss a possible guilty plea in exchange for reducing or
dropping some of the charges or agreeing to a request for a more lenient
sentence. It is generally accepted that almost 90 percent of all cases end
in a plea bargain, rather than a criminal trial.
10. Trial/adjudication. If an agreement cannot be reached or if the prosecution
does not wish to arrange a negotiated settlement of the case, a criminal
trial will be held before a judge (bench trial) or jury, who will decide
whether the prosecution’s evidence against the defendant is sufficient be-
yond a reasonable doubt to prove guilt. If a jury cannot reach a decision—
that is, if it is deadlocked—the case is left unresolved, leaving the prosecu-
tion to decide whether it should be retried at a later date.
11. Sentencing/disposition. If after a criminal trial the accused has been found
guilty as charged, he will be returned to court for sentencing. Possible dis-
positions may include a fine, probation, some form of community-based
corrections, a period of incarceration in a penal institution, and, in rare
instances, the death penalty.
12. Appeal/postconviction remedies. After conviction, the defense can ask the
trial judge to set aside the jury’s verdict because the jury has made a mis-
take of law, for example, by misinterpreting the judge’s instructions or
convicting on a charge that was not supported by the evidence. Failing
that, an appeal may be filed if after conviction the defendant believes that
her constitutional rights were violated by errors in the trial process. Ap-
pellate courts review such issues as whether evidence was used properly,
the judge conducted the trial in an approved fashion, jury selection was
properly done, and the attorneys in the case acted appropriately. If the
court rules that the appeal has merit, it can hold that the defendant be
given a new trial or, in some instances, order his outright release.
13. Correctional treatment. After sentencing, the offender is placed within the
jurisdiction of state or federal correctional authorities. The offender may
serve a probationary term, be placed in a community correctional facility,
serve a term in a county jail, or be housed in a prison. During this stage of
the criminal justice process, the offender may be asked to participate in
rehabilitation programs designed to help her make a successful readjust-
ment to society.
14. Release. Upon completion of the sentence and period of correction, the of-
fender will be free to return to society. Most inmates do not serve the full
term of their sentence but are freed through an early-release mechanism,
12 PART 1 • THE NATURE OF CRIME, LAW, AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
such as parole or pardon or by earning time off for good behavior. Offend-
ers sentenced to community supervision simply finish their term and re-
sume their lives in the community.
15. Postrelease. After termination of their correctional treatment, offenders
may be asked to spend some time in a community correctional center,
which acts as a bridge between a secure treatment facility and absolute
freedom. Offenders may find that their conviction has cost them some
personal privileges, such as the right to hold certain kinds of employment.
These may be returned by court order once the offenders have proven
their trustworthiness and willingness to adjust to society’s rules.
1,000 500
serious crimes crimes unreported
500
400
crimes reported
crimes unsolved
to police
100
people arrested
30 put on 35 65 adults 25
probation or juveniles go to considered for cases
dismissed juvenile court prosecution dropped
40 cases 10
accepted for jump bail
prosecution or abscond
30
cases go 1
acquitted
to trial
27 2
plead found
guilty guilty
9
29 placed on
sentenced probation
5 20
juveniles adults
incarcerated incarcerated
1. Police 1. Contact
2. Investigation
3. Arrest
4. Custody
2. Prosecution and defense 5. Complaint/charging
6. Grand jury/preliminary hearing
7. Arraignment
8. Bail/detention
9. Plea negotiations
3. Court 10. Adjudication
11. Disposition
12. Appeal/postconviction remedies
4. Corrections 13. Correction
14. Release
✓
15. Postrelease
I
Celebrated
cases
II
Serious
felonies
III
Less serious
felonies
IV
Misdemeanors
Level I The first layer of Walker’s model is made up of the celebrated cases in-
volving the wealthy and famous, such as O. J. Simpson and Michael Jackson,
or the not-so-powerful who victimize a famous person—for example, John
Hinckley, Jr., who shot President Ronald Reagan. Other cases fall into the first
layer because they are widely reported in the media and become the subject of
a TV investigation, such as Scott Peterson, convicted of killing his wife, Laci.
Cases in the first layer of the criminal justice wedding cake usually receive
the full array of criminal justice procedures, including competent defense at-
torneys, expert witnesses, jury trials, and elaborate appeals. Because of the
media focus on Level I cases and the Hollywood treatment of them, the public
is given the impression that most criminals are sober, intelligent people and
most victims are members of the upper classes, a patently false impression
Level III Though they can also be felonies, crimes that fall in the third layer of
the wedding cake are either less serious offenses, committed by young or first-
time offenders, or involve people who knew each other or were otherwise
16 PART 1 • THE NATURE OF CRIME, LAW, AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
related. Level III crimes may be dealt with by an outright dismissal, a plea
bargain, reduction in charges, or most typically, a probationary sentence.
Level IV The fourth layer of the cake is made up of the millions of misde-
meanors—disorderly conduct, shoplifting, public drunkenness, and minor as-
sault—that are handled by the lower criminal courts in assembly-line fashion.
Few defendants insist on exercising their constitutional rights, because the
delay would cost them valuable time and money, and punishment is typically
a fine or probation.15
The wedding cake model of informal justice is an intriguing alternative to
the traditional criminal justice flowchart. Criminal justice officials handle in-
dividual cases quite differently, yet there is a high degree of consistency with
which particular types or classes of cases are dealt in every legal jurisdiction.
For example, police and prosecutors in Los Angeles and Boston will each han-
dle the murder of a prominent citizen in similar fashion. They will also deal
with the death of an unemployed street person killed in a brawl in a similar
manner. The model is useful because it helps us realize that public opinion
about criminal justice is often formed on the basis of what happened in an
atypical case.
Crime control advocates do not want legal technicalities to help the guilty
go free and tie the hands of justice. They lobby for the abolition of legal re-
strictions that control a police officer’s ability to search for evidence and in-
terrogate suspects. They want law enforcement officers to be able to profile
people at an airport in order to identify terrorists, even if it means singling out
people because of their gender, race, or ethnic origin. They are angry at judges
who let obviously guilty people go free because a law enforcement officer
made an unintentional procedural error.
In sum, the key positions of the crime control perspective are:
• The purpose of the justice system is to deter crime through the applica-
tion of punishment.
• The more efficient the system, the greater its effectiveness.
• The justice system is not equipped to treat people, but rather, to investi-
gate crimes, apprehend suspects, and punish the guilty.
Rehabilitation Perspective
rehabilitation perspective A
If the crime control perspective views the justice system in terms of protect- model of criminal justice that
ing the public and controlling criminal elements, then advocates of the reha- views its primary purpose as
bilitation perspective view crime as an expression of frustration and anger helping to care for people who
cannot manage themselves.
created by social inequality and the justice system as a means of caring for Crime is an expression of frustra-
and treating people who have been the victims of this inequity. According to tion and anger created by social
this view, crime can be controlled by giving people the means to improve their inequality that can be controlled
by giving people the means to im-
lifestyle and helping them overcome any personal and or psychological prob- prove their lifestyle through con-
lems caused by their life circumstances. ventional endeavors.
The rehabilitation concept assumes that people are at the mercy of social,
economic, and interpersonal conditions and interactions. Criminals them-
selves are the victims of racism, poverty, strain, blocked opportunities, alien-
ation, family disruption, and other social problems. They live in socially dis-
organized neighborhoods that are incapable of providing proper education,
health care, or civil services. Society must help them in order to compensate
for their social problems.
Rehabilitation advocates believe that government programs can help re-
duce crime on both a societal (macro-) and individual (micro-) level. On the
macro- or societal level, rehabilitation efforts are aimed at preventing crimes
before they occur. If legitimate opportunities increase, crime rates decline.17
This goal may be achieved at the neighborhood level by increasing economic
opportunities through job training, family counseling, educational services,
and crisis intervention. On a micro- or individual level, rehabilitation efforts
are aimed at known offenders who have already violated the law. The best
method to reduce crime and recidivism (repeat offending) rates is to help of-
fenders produce through intensive one-on-one counseling prosocial changes
in attitudes and improved cognitive thinking patterns.18 Although the public
may want to “get tough” on crime, many are willing to make exceptions, for
example, by advocating leniency for younger offenders.19
The key provisions of the rehabilitation model are:
• In the long run, it is better to treat than punish.
• Criminals are society’s victims.
• Helping others is part of the American culture.
Nonintervention Perspective
nonintervention perspective A
Supporters of the nonintervention perspective believe that justice agencies justice philosophy that empha-
should limit their involvement with criminal defendants. They believe that re- sizes the least intrusive treatment
gardless of whether intervention is designed to punish or treat people, the ul- possible. Among its central poli-
cies are decarceration, diversion,
timate effect of any involvement is harmful and will have long-term negative and decriminalization. In other
effects. Once involved with the justice system, criminal defendants develop a words, less is better.
permanent record that follows them for the rest of their lives. They may be decriminalization Reducing the
watched and kept under surveillance. Bearing an official label disrupts their penalty for a criminal act but not
actually legalizing it.
personal and family life and harms their own self-image; they may view them-
legalization The removal of all
selves as bad, evil, outcasts, troublemakers, or crazy. Official labels then may criminal penalties from a previ-
promote rather than reduce the continuity in antisocial activities.23 When ously outlawed act.
people are given less stigmatized forms of punishment, such as probation, victimless crime An act that is in
they are less likely to become repeat offenders.24 violation of society’s moral code
and therefore has been out-
Fearing the harmful effects of stigma and labels, noninterventionists have lawed—for example, drug abuse,
tried to place limitations on the government’s ability to control people’s lives. gambling, and prostitution. These
They have called for the decriminalization (reduction of penalties) and acts are linked together because,
although they have no external
legalization (lawful and non-criminal) of nonserious victimless crimes, such victim, they are considered harm-
as the possession of small amounts of marijuana (see the following Policy, ful to the social fabric.
Programs, and Issues in Criminal Justice box). deinstitutionalization The move-
Noninterventionists have sponsored the removal of nonviolent offenders ment to remove as many offend-
ers as possible from secure con-
from the nation’s correctional system, a policy referred to as deinstitutional- finement and treat them in the
ization. They support the placement of first offenders who commit minor community.
20 PART 1 • THE NATURE OF CRIME, LAW, AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
help reduce these problems. However, rather than con- The problems of alcoholism should serve as a
done drug use, Gray calls for a program of drug main- warning of what can happen when controlled sub-
tenance (allowing addicts a monitored drug intake) stances are made readily available. If legalized, the
and controlled distribution (in which government-reg- number of drug-dependent babies could begin to
ulated drugs are sold in a controlled fashion). Gray match or exceed the number who are delivered with
goes so far as to suggest that generically packaged fetal alcohol syndrome. Drunk-driving fatalities,
drugs such as marijuana could be sold by pharmacists, which today number about twenty-five thousand per
with a steep tax that would fund rehabilitation pro- year, could be matched by deaths caused by driving
grams and drug education. under the influence of pot or crack. And though dis-
tribution would be regulated, adolescents would
Against Legalization likely have the same opportunity to obtain potent
At a recent hearing (2003) on legalization of mari- drugs as they now have with beer and other forms of
juana for medical purposes in Maryland, John P. Wal- alcohol.
ters, director of the Office of National Drug Control
Policy (ONDCP), stated: Critical Thinking
We owe people with debilitating medical condi- In the final analysis, and after considering all the is-
tions the best that science has to offer—not the re- sues in this ongoing debate, should drugs be legal-
sults of interest group lobbying and political com- ized? What is the logic of banning marijuana while
promise. Research has not demonstrated that dangerous substances such as scotch and bourbon are
smoked marijuana is safe and effective medicine. readily available in stores?
Legalizing smoked marijuana under the guise of
medicine is scientifically irresponsible and contra- InfoTrac College Edition Research
dictory to our high standards for approval of med- To find out what former drug czar and value
ications. The legislation being considered in Mary- guru Will Bennett thought of the Pottawatomie
land for so-called medical marijuana would also County decision, go to InfoTrac College Edition and
mean more availability of a dangerous drug in our read: “Statement of Empower America Co-Director
neighborhoods. The citizens of Maryland deserve William J. Bennett on the Supreme Court’s Decision
better. in Pottawatomie County v. Earls,” US Newswire, June
Walters and other legalization opponents are 27, 2002, p1008178n9466.
of the opinion that legalization may harm the well-
being of the community by creating health and social Sources: Ali Mokdad, James Marks, Donna Stroup, and Julie Ger-
damage. Individuals do not have the right to harm berding, “Actual Causes of Death in the United States, 2000,” Jour-
society even if it means curbing their freedom and nal of the American Medical Association 10 (2004): 1242–1243; Press
Release, “White House Drug Czar, Chair of Congressional Black
personal choices—that is, the right to use drugs. If in- Caucus Rep. Elijah Cummings and Maryland Community Leaders
jured by their drug use, individuals would have to be Discuss Harms of ‘Medical Marijuana’ and Warn of Dangers of Mar-
cared for by the community at a very substantial cost ijuana Legalization,” March 24, 2003, www.whitehousedrugpolicy.
gov/news/press03/032403.html, accessed on August 3, 2005; Ethan
to citizens who do not use drugs. Legalization would Nadelmann, “The U.S. Is Addicted to War on Drugs.” Globe and
result in an increase in the nation’s rate of drug us- Mail. May 20, 2003; James P. Gray, Why Our Drug Laws Have Failed
and What We Can Do About It: A Judicial Indictment of the War on
age, creating an even larger group of nonproductive, Drugs (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 2001); Erich Goode,
drug-dependent people, who must be cared for by the Between Politics and Reason: The Drug Legalization Debate (New
rest of society. If drugs were legalized and freely York: St. Martin’s Press, 1997); David Courtwright, “Should We
Legalize Drugs? History Answers No,” American Heritage (Febru-
available, users might significantly increase their ary/March 1993): 43–56; Ethan Nadelmann, “America’s Drug Prob-
daily intake. In countries like Iran and Thailand, lem,” Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 65
where drugs are cheap and readily available, nar- (1991): 24–40; Ethan Nadelmann, “Should We Legalize Drugs?
History Answers Yes,” American Heritage (February/March 1993):
cotic-use rates are high. 41–56.
22 PART 1 • THE NATURE OF CRIME, LAW, AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Justice Perspective
According to those holding the justice perspective, the greatest challenge
facing the American criminal justice system is its ability to dispense fair and
equal justice to those who come before the law. It is unfair for police to issue
a summons to one person for a traffic violation while letting a second offender
off with a warning or to have two people commit the same crime but receive
different sentences or punishments. Unequal and inconsistent treatment pro-
duces disrespect for the system, suspiciousness, and frustration; it also in-
creases the likelihood of recidivism. Therefore, law violators should be evalu-
ated on the basis of their current behavior, not on what they have done in the
past (they have already paid for that behavior) nor on what they may do in the
future (since future behavior cannot be accurately predicted). The treatment
of criminal offenders must be based solely on present behavior: punishment
must be equitably administered and based on “just deserts.”
The justice perspective has had considerable influence in molding the na-
tion’s sentencing policy. There has been an ongoing effort to reduce discretion
and guarantee that every offender convicted of a particular crime receives
equal punishment. There have been a number of initiatives designed to
pretrial diversion A program that achieve this result, including mandatory sentences requiring that all people
provides nonpunitive, community-
based alternatives to more intru- convicted of a crime receive the same prison sentence. Truth-in-sentencing
sive forms of punishment such as laws now require offenders to serve a substantial portion of their prison sen-
jail or prison. tence behind bars, limiting their eligibility for early release on parole.26
widening the net of justice The The key elements of the justice perspective are:
charge that programs designed
to divert offenders from the jus- • People should receive equal treatment for equal crimes.
tice system actually enmesh them
further in the process by substi- • Decision making in the justice system must be standardized and struc-
tuting more intrusive treatment tured by rules and regulations.
programs for less intrusive pun-
ishment-oriented outcomes. • Whenever possible, individual discretion must be reduced and controlled.
justice perspective A view of jus- • Inconsistent treatment produces disrespect for the system.
tice that holds that all people
should be treated equally before
the law. Equality may be best
achieved through the control of Restorative Justice Perspective
individual discretion in the justice
process. According to the concept of restorative justice, the criminal justice system
restorative justice perspective should promote a peaceful and just society; the justice system should aim for
A view of criminal justice that ad- peacemaking, not punishment.27
vocates peaceful solutions and
mediation rather than coercive The restorative justice perspective draws its inspiration from religious
punishments. and philosophical teachings ranging from Quakerism to Zen. Advocates of
CHAPTER 1 • CRIME AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE 23
Justice
Equity
Just desert
Determinate sentencing
Abolish parole
Due process Rehabilitation
Procedural fairness Treatment
Civil rights Concern for the offender
Competent counsel Counseling and prevention
Rule of law Build schools, not prisons
Appellate review Oppose the death penalty
Crime control
Deterrence
Nonintervention
Concern for the victim
Avoid stigma
Effective law enforcement
Decriminalize
Restricted civil rights
Decarcerate
Incapacitation of
Deinstitutionalize
criminals Restorative Divert
Death penalty justice
Reintegrate
Restitution
Mediation
Nonviolence
restorative justice view the efforts of the state to punish and control as en-
couraging crime rather than discouraging crime. The violent, punishing acts
of the state are not dissimilar from the violent acts of individuals.28 Therefore,
mutual aid rather than coercive punishment is the key to a harmonious soci-
ety. Without the capacity to restore damaged social relations, society’s re-
sponse to crime has been almost exclusively punitive.
According to restorative justice, resolution of the conflict between crimi-
nal and victim should take place in the community in which it originated and
not in some far-off prison. The victim should be given a chance to voice his
story, and the offender can directly communicate his need for social reintegra-
tion and treatment. The goal is to enable the offender to appreciate the dam-
age he has caused, to make amends, and to be reintegrated back into society.
Restorative justice programs are now being geared to these principles. Po-
lice officers, as elements of community policing programs, are beginning to
use mediation techniques to settle disputes rather than resort to formal ar-
rest.29 Mediation and conflict resolution programs are common features in
many communities. Financial and community service restitution programs as
an alternative to imprisonment have been in operation for more than two
decades.
The most important elements of the restorative justice model are:
• Offenders should be reintegrated back into society.
• Coercive punishments are self-defeating.
• The justice system must become more humane.
The various perspectives are summarized in Figure 1.5.
24 PART 1 • THE NATURE OF CRIME, LAW, AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE
Perspectives in Perspective
Advocates of each view have attempted to promote their vision of what jus-
tice is all about and how it should be enforced. During the past decade, the
crime control and justice models have dominated. Laws have been tough-
ened and the rights of the accused curtailed, the prison population has
grown, and the death penalty has been employed against convicted murder-
ers. Because the crime rate has been dropping, these policies seem to be ef-
fective; they may be questioned if crime rates once again begin to rise. At the
same time, efforts to rehabilitate offenders, to provide them with elements of
due process, and to give them the least intrusive treatment have not been
abandoned. Police, courts, and correctional agencies supply a wide range of
treatment and rehabilitation programs to offenders in all stages of the crimi-
nal justice system. Whenever possible, those accused of crime are treated in-
formally in nonrestrictive, community-based programs, and the effects of
stigma are guarded against. Although the legal rights of offenders are being
closely scrutinized by the courts, the basic constitutional rights of the ac-
cused remain inviolate. Guardians of the process have made sure that defen-
dants are allowed the maximum protection possible under the law. For exam-
ple, criminal defendants have been awarded the right to competent legal
counsel at trial; merely having a lawyer to defend them is not considered suf-
ficient legal protection.
In sum, understanding the justice system today requires analyzing a vari-
ety of occupational roles, institutional processes, legal rules, and administra-
tive doctrines. Each predominant view of criminal justice provides a vantage
point for understanding and interpreting these rather complex issues. No sin-
gle view is the right or correct one. Each individual must choose the perspec-
tive that best fits his or her own ideas and judgment—or they can all be dis-
carded and the individual’s own view substituted.
• Should police officers tell the truth even if it means that a guilty person
goes free? For example, a police officer stops a car for a traffic violation
and searches it illegally. He finds a weapon used in a particularly heinous
shooting in which three children were killed. Would it be ethical for the
officer to lie on the witness stand and say the gun was laying on the car
seat in plain sight (thereby rendering its seizure legal and proper)? Or
should he tell the truth and risk having the charges dismissed, leaving the
offender free to kill again?
• Should police officers be loyal to their peers even when they know they
have violated the law? A new officer soon becomes aware that his partner
is taking gratuities from local gangsters in return for looking the other
way and allowing their prostitution and bookmaking operations to flour-
ish. Should the rookie file a complaint and turn in his partner? Will she be
labeled a “rat” and lose the respect of her fellow officers? After all, gam-
bling and prostitution are not violent crimes and do not really hurt any-
one? Or do they?
How can law enforcement officers be aided in making ethical decisions?
Various national organizations have produced model codes of conduct that
can serve as behavioral guides. One well-known document created by the In-
ternational Association of Chiefs of Police says in part:
As a law enforcement officer my fundamental duty is to serve mankind; to safe-
guard lives and property; to protect the innocent against deception, the weak
against oppression or intimidation, and the peaceful against violence or disor-
der; and to respect the constitutional rights of all men to liberty, equality, and
justice . . . 31
Defense Attorney As an officer of the court, along with the judge, prosecu-
tors, and other trial participants, the defense attorney seeks to uncover the
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
heard the ferrymen singing on the river below, and soon afterwards
the Kashif appeared at the door. He apologized, saying he had been
occupied in his divan. I had dinner served again, and tasted the
dishes to encourage him, but it appeared that he had not been able
to keep his appetite so long, and had dined also. Still, he ate enough
to satisfy me that he relished my dishes, and afterwards drank a
sherbet of sugar and vinegar with great gusto. He had three or four
attendants, and with him came a Berber merchant, who had lately
been in Khartoum. I produced my sketch-book and maps, and
astonished the company for three hours. I happened to have a book
of Shaksperean views, which I had purchased in Stratford-on-Avon.
The picture of Shakspere gave the Kashif and shekh great delight,
and the former considered the hovel in which the poet was born,
“very grand.” The church in Stratford they thought a marvellous
building, and the merchant confessed that it was greater than Lattif
Pasha’s palace in Khartoum, which he had supposed to be the finest
building in the world.
The next morning the shekh proposed going with me to the
remains of a temple, half an hour distant, on the eastern bank of the
river; the place, he said, where the people found the little images,
agates and scarabei, which they brought to me in great quantities.
After walking a mile and a half over the sands, which have here
crowded the vegetation to the very water’s edge, we came to a
broad mound of stones, broken bricks and pottery, with a foundation
wall of heavy limestone blocks, along the western side. There were
traces of doors and niches, and on the summit of the mound the
pedestals of columns similar to those of El Berkel. From this place
commenced a waste of ruins, extending for nearly two miles towards
the north-west, while the breadth, from east to west, was about
equal. For the most part, the buildings were entirely concealed by
the sand, which was filled with fragments of pottery and glass, and
with shining pebbles of jasper, agate and chalcedony. Half a mile
further, we struck on another mound, of greater extent, though the
buildings were entirely level with the earth. The foundations of
pillars were abundant, and fragments of circular limestone blocks lay
crumbling to pieces in the rubbish. The most interesting object was
a mutilated figure of blue granite, of which only a huge pair of wings
could be recognized. The shekh said that all the Frank travellers who
came there broke off a piece and carried it away with them. I did
not follow their example. Towards the river were many remains of
crude brick walls, and the ground was strewn with pieces of
excellent hard-burnt bricks. The sand evidently conceals many
interesting objects. I saw in one place, where it had fallen in, the
entrance to a chamber, wholly below the surface. The Arabs were at
work in various parts of the plain, digging up the sand, which they
filled in baskets and carried away on donkeys. The shekh said it
contained salt, and was very good to make wheat grow, whence I
inferred that the earth is nitrous. We walked for an hour or two over
the ruins, finding everywhere the evidence that a large capital had
once stood on the spot. The bits of water jars which we picked up
were frequently painted and glazed with much skill. The soil was in
many places wholly composed of the debris of the former dwellings.
This was, without doubt, the ancient Napata, of which Djebel Berkel
was only the necropolis. Napata must have been one of the greatest
cities of Ancient Africa, after Thebes, Memphis and Carthage. I felt a
peculiar interest in wandering over the site of that half-forgotten
capital, whereof the ancient historians knew little more than we.
That so little is said by them in relation to it is somewhat surprising,
notwithstanding its distance from the Roman frontier.
In the afternoon, Achmet, with great exertion, backed by all the
influence of the Kashif, succeeded in obtaining ten piastres worth of
bread. The latter sent me the shekh of the camels, who furnished
me with three animals and three men, to Wadi Halfa, at ninety-five
piastres apiece. They were to accompany my caravan to Ambukol,
on the Dongolese frontier where the camels from Khartoum were to
be discharged. I spent the rest of the day talking with the shekh on
religious matters. He gave me the history of Christ, in return for
which I related to him that of the Soul of Mahomet, from one
hundred and ten thousand years before the Creation of the World,
until his birth, according to the Arab Chronicles. This quite overcame
him. He seized my hand and kissed it with fervor, acknowledging me
as the more holy man of the two. He said he had read the Books of
Moses, the Psalms of David and the Gospel of Christ, but liked David
best, whose words flowed like the sound of the zumarra, or Arab
flute. To illustrate it, he chanted one of the Psalms in a series of not
unmusical cadences. He then undertook to repeat the ninety
attributes of God, and thought he succeeded, but I noticed that
several of the epithets were repeated more than once.
The north wind increased during the afternoon, and towards night
blew a very gale. The sand came in through the door in such
quantities that I was obliged to move my bed to a more sheltered
part of my house. Numbers of huge black beetles, as hard and
heavy as grape-shot, were dislodged from their holes and dropped
around me with such loud raps that I was scarcely able to sleep. The
sky was dull and dark, hardly a star to be seen, and the wind roared
in the palms like a November gale let loose among the boughs of a
Northern forest. It was a grand roar, drowning the sharp rustle of
the leaves when lightly stirred, and rocked my fancies as gloriously
as the pine. In another country than Africa, I should have predicted
rain, hail, equinoctial storms, or something of the kind, but there I
went to sleep with a positive certainty of sunshine on the morrow.
I was up at dawn, and had breakfast by sunrise; nevertheless, we
were obliged to wait a long while for the camels, or rather the
pestiferous Kababish who went after them. The new men and
camels were in readiness, as the camel-shekh came over the river to
see that all was right. The Kashif sent me a fine black ram, as
provision for the journey. Finally, towards eight o’clock, every thing
was in order and my caravan began to move. I felt real regret at
leaving the pleasant spot, especially the beautiful bower of palms at
the door of my house. When my effects had been taken out, the
shekh called his eldest son Saad, his wife Fatima, and their two
young sons, to make their salaams. They all kissed my hand, and I
then gave the old man and Saad my backsheesh for their services.
The shekh took the two gold medjids readily, without any
hypocritical show of reluctance, and lifted my hand to his lips and
forehead. When all was ready, he repeated the Fatha, or opening
paragraph of the Koran, as each camel rose from its knees, in order
to secure the blessing of Allah upon our journey. He then took me in
his arms, kissed both my cheeks, and with tears in his eyes, stood
showering pious phrases after me, till I was out of hearing. With no
more vanity or selfishness than is natural to an Arab, Shekh
Mohammed Abd e’-Djebàl had many excellent qualities, and there
are few of my Central African acquaintances whom I would rather
see again.
CHAPTER XXXIV.
OLD DONGOLA AND NEW DONGOLA.