0% found this document useful (0 votes)
187 views20 pages

PFMEA Process Test Brake Booster

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
187 views20 pages

PFMEA Process Test Brake Booster

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 20

815689295.

xlsx Rev: 06/09/23

PFMEA No: Key Contact/Phone: Date (Orig.): Date (Rev.):

Julio Cesar Medrano Roque Ext. 1615 11/6/2024 11/10/2024


Part Number/Latest Change level: Core Team: Gonzalez Gozalez Edwin Luis Customer Engineering Approval/Date
Salgado Hernandez Marco
Gil Valenzuela Mariely Paulina
Todos los N/P encontrados en la base de datos de especificación de configuración para Vacuum Boosters (CRIMP)
Lopez Sanchez Jaquelinne Yaneli
Machado Reyes Edgar Alejandro
Part Name/Description: Company/Plant Approval
Osuna Arias PaolaDate: Customer Quality Approval/Date
(if required): N/A
Todas las N/P de las familias aplicables de Vacuum Booster (CRIMP) Julio Cesar Medrano Roque:_________________

Company Name/Plant Location: Other Approval Signatures/Date (if required): Other Customer Approvals/Date
(if required): N/A
Tijuana, B.C. Ave. Laguna Mainar #4951, Col. El Lago, B. C., México N/A

Occurrence

Detection
Op.

Severity
Current Process Control Current Process Control

RPN
Item Operation Description Requirements Potential Failure Mode(s) Potential Effect(s) of Failure Potential Cause of Failure ACTION(S) TAKEN SEV OCC DET RPL CLASS
Prevention Detection
No.

Mantenimiento y
Rechazo de material verificación de
Función incorrecta de la Verificación de
Maquina de prueba final bueno/Aceptación de material Falla en equipo EOLT 5 3 equipos de prueba 5 75
máquina de prueba muestras
malo (Calibración y
Muestras)

Material sospechoso Operador no siguió Entrenamiento al


Unidad probada Unidad no probada 7 3 Inspección visual 8 168
(Posible falla) instrucción de trabajo Operador
1 Pruba Final
Función incorrecta de la Verificacion de Verificacion de
Fixturas de prueba Fixtura incorrecta Falla en equipo EOLT 5 3 5 75
máquina de prueba modelo correcto tooling correcto

Verificacion de
Mal funcionamiento en Verificacion de
Fixturas desgastada Falso rechazo en material Falla en equipo EOLT 5 3 tooling en buen 5 75
unidad fixtura ajustada
estado
Falta de verificacion del Verificacion con gage
Gage de altura Altura fuera de especificacion Falla en equipo EOLT 5 3 Verificacion de altura 5 75
material de altura

Vernier, altimetro, gauges, Problemas de instalacion Operador no siguió Entrenamiento al Verificacion


2 Inspección dimensional Configuración incorrecta 8 2 5 80
fixturas (En Auto) instrucción de trabajo Operador Configuracion

Problemas de instalacion Operador no siguió Entrenamiento al


3 Etiquetado Estacion de trabajo Etiquetada incorrecta 7 3 Inspección visual 8 168
(En Auto) instrucción de trabajo Operador

Sharepoint.com/Quality/Sharepoint.com/Quality/MPM 1 Tijuana/Document Control/Planes de Control//815689295.xlsx 1 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 2 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 3 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 4 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 5 of 20


815689295.xlsx

GM Table 3

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 6 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 7 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 8 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 9 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 10 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 11 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 12 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 13 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 14 of 20


815689295.xlsx

Sharepoint.com/quality/MPA Corporate Standards/Forms/815689295.xlsx 15 of 20


PFMEA Risk Limiting Me
To use with AIAG 4th Edition SEV

There are 3 priority levels based on the calculation in the P


Those items that have a 1 in both the occurrence and dete
10 are considered to be and RPL-S – Risk must be mitigate
1 for those items with a severity of 1-8 and a 1 in both the
Highest level of risk, should review for potential risk redu
2 for the medium level - Medium level of risk, next group
reduction activity
3 for the lowest level - Lowest level of risk, risk reduction

For severity 9 & 10 Requested Detection is 3.


If detection is higher action for improving detection to 3
For severity 9 & 10 Requested Detection is 3.
If detection is higher action for improving detection to 3
miting Method
e with AIAG 4th Edition SEV, OCC, DET scales.

Note: RPL = S if severity is 9 or 10


and RPL = 1 in the Priority table
above

ulation in the Priority Level Matrix


ence and detection zone and a severity of 9 or
ust be mitigated or deviated
a 1 in both the occurrence and detection zone -
ential risk reduction activity
isk, next group to review for potential risk

, risk reduction activity not necessary

s 3.
detection to 3 or lower are requested
s 3.
detection to 3 or lower are requested
severity is 9 or 10
e Priority table

You might also like