Module2 Markets Efficiency
Module2 Markets Efficiency
Economics I
What is a market?
- Institutions where potential buyers and sellers meet for exchange of
goods and services (such as via e-markets as well).
What forces drive their actions?
- The forces of demand (buyers) and supply (sellers) drive the market
mechanism.
How do these actors of the market communicate with each other?
- Via Prices.
What ensures the stability or equilibrium in these markets/ or in this
free-market model?
- The price mechanism or the free-market model.
But, for now, it’s enough to know that a perfectly competitive market
structure is one where there are:
many buyers
many sellers
homogeneous products - goods and services
no barriers to entry and exit
perfect information between buyer and seller; and perfect mobility
no government intervention and no lobbies
Implications of a perfectly competitive market structure:
No single buyer and seller has any influence over the price.
Examples: agricultural markets, like, wheat market, onion market, etc.
QUESTION: How does this market work?
Quantity demanded of any good is the amount that the buyers are
willing to buy at the given price level.
As the price level increases, the quantity demanded falls, that is, there
exist an inverse relationship between the quantity demanded of a
good and the price of the good, other things being staying the same.
Also known as the LAW OF DEMAND.
There are two ways to depict this inverse relation - tabular (called
demand schedule) and graphical (called demand curve).
Demand schedule is the tabular representation that shows the quantity
demanded at each price.
The demand curve is the one that graphs the demand schedule,
illustrates how the quantity demanded of the good changes as its price
varies.
Because a higher price reduces the quantity demanded, the demand
curve slopes downwards.
The crux of the free market mechanism, thus, is that even if any
situation leads to disequilibrium (caused by shifts in demand curve
and/or in supply curve), the free markets will automatically adjust to
restore the equilibrium.
Buyers and sellers are ‘free’ to act in their self-interests to maximise
their utilities and profits, respectively.
Thus, let the markets be and they will achieve an equilibrium
outcome - which will be the most ‘efficient’ outcome.
Consumer Surplus (CS) is, thus, the difference between the price that the
consumer / buyer is willing to pay and the one they actually pay, that is: CS
= WTP- Price
Therefore, based on the example, the CS of different consumers will be
diagrammatically calculated as shown below:
Producer Surplus (CS) is, thus, the difference between the price that the
producer/ seller actually receives for a commodity and the one at which they
are willing to sell or their cost of production, that is: PS = Price - Cost
Therefore, based on the example, the PS of different producers will be
diagrammatically calculated as shown below:
When the govt. imposed price ceiling is below the market clearing price
level, it becomes binding.
As shown in the figure on slide 39, market clearing price is at $3 which is >
the price ceiling of $2.
This means that now the seller cannot sell the product at a price higher than
$2.
At $2, however, demand > supply, leading to excess demand in the market
or shortages.
This is so because the price ceiling has been set at such a low level, that
many suppliers not able to recover their minimum costs would not be willing
to sell at this lower price, hence, sellers would adjust their supply in wake of
lower prices to a lower level of output.
Contrarily, the buyers would adjust their demand to be higher, in wake of
the lower price level.
This results in higher shortages in long-run than in short-run.
As can be seen in the graph above, due to the binding price ceiling,
the quantity supplied is restricted at 75, while the quantity demanded
has increased to 125.
Dr. Divya Gupta Markets and Efficiency Economics I 39 / 46
Price Ceiling and Inefficiency
Recall that a price ceiling was intended to protect the interests of the consumers.
Yet, it ends up hurting those it was trying to help.
CS definitely decreases from A + B + C to only A.
Further, the situation of shortage created by a price ceiling will lead to rationing by
sellers.
More often than not, such rationing mechanisms are discriminatory and inefficient.
Also, for example, price ceilings as rent controls may keep rents low, but it also
discourages landlords from maintaining their buildings and makes housing hard to
find.
Dr. Divya Gupta Markets and Efficiency Economics I 41 / 46
Price Floor: Non-binding
Non-binding price floor: A price floor is non-binding if it already is lower
than the market price.
Since the floor suggests a minimum and the market price is already higher
than this minimum, such a price floor is non-binding in the sense that it
does not impose any restriction on the existing market equilibrium.
As shown below, the market price is at 3$ while the price floor is that of $2.